I'm not normalized scum like you nor care about your pretentious notion of maturity, so you drop your shaming tactics. Those never worked on me, which is what pisses filth like you off the most. Those attacking me sure as fuck attacked me, even physically. Those targeting me targeted me alone. That's not paranoia. I didn't even speak in the vicinity of most of them before they did either. It was specific and flagrant, even technically illegal, then handwaved and reversed by sexists like you. That was reality, which doesn't fit your preferred narrative's gender contradictions. You suck at gas-lighting.
The complainer is not always wrong. The shrinks, ironically, agree with me, even the fake ass douche with the busty intern that does nothing. They're worthless when the problem is other people.
Serial-killer was about half the classes I've been to in 4 years of CS, and that's not counting groups just hanging around campus talking about "him". I've been a "him" quite often. That I haven't committed violence doesn't stop anyone else from threats or actions. A woman attacking me would make me primary aggressor and give them all the excuse they need. This is reality, and you're siding with them in presuming this is a serious matter for males. You'll find out whenever a chick is in the mood to ruin your life.
You're blinded by your own prejudice. Seriously say, "A woman's face justifies her being assaulted, and she shouldn't care what a majority of bigots think or what out of their prejudice they even do to her." If you really think that about men, it shouldn't be a problem to post the same about women. Rather betting you wouldn't dare.
My face is usually blank. I'm called "serial-killer" for entering classrooms and sitting down. I genuinely grin, and it's called "rape face". You're not reading my face in text, Schizo-moron, nor would you be saying this shit to a woman to handwave assault, Sexist-filth.
Misanthropy is a sport here. That's not what's sticking in your craw. Criticism of men get interesting, informative, even funny here. Replying negatively will even get you off-topic. It's criticism of women that always gets flamebait and usually troll, and, if the poster's male, the resident psychics always divine something wrong with him.
No one in my life could ever read me. Besides, the women were openly the aggressors and clearly consciously gender-privileged, pulling all the misandrous tricks in the book in full public view. Were they afraid they'd not have done anything like what they did. They were physically threatening, even actually committing assault, yet playing victim the whole time. Not once in my life has anyone ever had a problem with their aggressions against me. Those that didn't awkwardly pretend it wasn't happening will back them in their unprovoked aggression, while implying my very presence justified it. You just proved no different. This isn't just prejudicial thought, but you're reducing even actions to nothing because I'm male. You wouldn't be making such excuses, if I were female. How dare you support such blatant sexism under then pretense of being the voice positivity.
Have you considered it's your clothing, hairstyle, lack of glasses, and facial hair that are giving these impressions to people?
Not appearing like some pre-approved subculture drone isn't giving people impressions. They're quite prejudiced on their own, which was my point. General society is a loaded situation for a male, and women are holding the gun.
Incidentally, soul-patches will get you openly sneered at by women. It specifically increases your acceptable target rating. Showing even a little teeth specially gets called my "rape face", so that's a really bad idea. Widening from the "evil grin" goes into Joker territory.
Well, knowing you're at a socially mandated disadvantage by their presence, and any one could go psycho-bitch to various degrees of impunity leaving you with no safe recourse. I'm built and mean looking (thanks to Hollywood's image indoctrination and my facial structure). Men generally don't start shit with me, though they'll often whisper "serial-killer" when I first walk, stand, or sit in their vicinity. Women outright target me. They get in my face and call me creepy, while clearly expecting me to leave her holy presence dutifully shamed. Hell, the older fatter ones get rapey up to what would be legally punishable sexual assault, were it gender reversed. No one cares. That's pretty intimidating. Ironically, generally worse than cops, and they're postured at me in pack and grabbed guns while glaring at me walk down a sidewalk or out of college's main exit.
H-1B workers are about cheapness not talents or skill. They fake not having skilled workers by demanding grab bags of overly specific skills, for IT positions often in specific software packages that didn't even exist for the years of experience they're demanding. Read most any job listing. HR's both incompetent and deceitful.
The border states of Maryland, Missouri, Delaware, Kentucky, and the newly separate West Virginia were Union slave states till after the war. New York had slaves till 1829, Rhode Island till 1840 at least, Pennsylvania till 1847, Connecticut till 1848, and New Hampshire and New Jersey till national abolition, You ignorant mindfucked shill.
I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the states where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so.
My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union.
I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races. I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of making voters or jurors of Negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people. There is a physical difference between the white and black races, which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality.
I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I, as much as any other man, am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race.
Abraham fuckin' Lincoln
The North was racist as fuck all. Slavery was only out of fashion not a grand moral issue. Beating up the wrong kinda white people was literally open humor into the 20th century. The Nazis copied eugenics from the US. How libtarded are you?
What you find irritating is irrelevant when accurate. The industry was male-dominated. This was declared sexist thus the current pissing away money and fucking over the males specifically and the industry generally to make way for females who couldn't hack it to begin with who think they're special. Of course, those females tend to piss off those already in the industry who could, but that's easily shouted down by the likes of you.
You do know feminists have their own lexicon? "Sexism" by their usage isn't actually sexism. Like how "male privilege" doesn't require a male to have any privileges. I'm serious. Check with the "gender studies" department. They'll explain exactly this.
Intuitive groking is more important that formulaic recitation. Rhetorical "elite" tend to ignore useful semantics for meaningless syntax. Form is more important to them than accuracy or usefulness.
Ever tried dating those women who hold grammar and spelling as indicators of intellect? They're vapid and rule-lawyer-esque sleazy. In faux intellectual discussion, they'll correct your expression based on their personal aesthetics and their preferred subculture's PCness not fact or logic. The best at fact and logic are usually "sloppy" dorks, mostly male. Would say it's ironic, but at this point, it's just fucked and not funny anymore.
Good luck with that. Aside from the being caught cheating even by their own rules, which is impressive given how circular they are, that guy who actually managed to get them in court for their policy being unconstitutional was explicitly rejected on the basis of IRS policy itself, as in the Constitution only matters if IRS policy says so. Not being a lawyer, I'm still not sure why the judge said he raised good points, while the case was found against him by some IRS guy and not the judge. Apparently by some special rules, they're functionally their own judge too. They'd have to agree to dismantle themselves now.
You'd have to assume you already know most everything about the population, and that's it's grossly homogeneous. They precisely don't know what they'd have to know to here to make the assumptions they're making, and they're ignoring other sources of contrary data though that's par for them.
Stealing and threating is politics. It's the source and maintenance of all nationstates and all official regions thereof. Are you claiming all governments currently in existence are illegitimate?
Not if you count "forced to penetrate". They don't even count non-vaginal penetration in my state. Your assumption's based on intentionally skewed definitions attempting to bury male victims, but what's new?
And this had to do with the Union's motivation how? The North didn't really give a shit. Some unauthorized dumbass started the shooting. The politicians in the North used that as an excuse because they didn't want to lose land and resources. When that petered out, the North wanted the bloodshed over. Only then did the anti-slavery propaganda get thrown on the fire in attempt to fuel the continuation of the war.
You do recall the North still had slave states till after the damn war? How about where the race riots eventually occurred? Racism against the wrong kind of white was perfectly normal up there on into inventing eugenics before the Nazis. The Northern majority didn't remotely care enough about slavery to fight a war. Lincoln himself just wanted the black people out of the country( and massively unconstitutional dictatorial power, which should sound familiar).
The war wasn't the grand moral gesture ignorant shitheads like you love to wank over. It was about arrogant greedy federal overreach from the North intruding upon rival power "clubs" in the South, who were just expected to roll over, and the resulting backlash when they didn't.
Slashdot Mirror
I'm not normalized scum like you nor care about your pretentious notion of maturity, so you drop your shaming tactics. Those never worked on me, which is what pisses filth like you off the most. Those attacking me sure as fuck attacked me, even physically. Those targeting me targeted me alone. That's not paranoia. I didn't even speak in the vicinity of most of them before they did either. It was specific and flagrant, even technically illegal, then handwaved and reversed by sexists like you. That was reality, which doesn't fit your preferred narrative's gender contradictions. You suck at gas-lighting.
You've already made my point. You excused violence only one way. You're sexist. Hell, you used "nancy boy" seriously to shame a male. You lose.
The complainer is not always wrong. The shrinks, ironically, agree with me, even the fake ass douche with the busty intern that does nothing. They're worthless when the problem is other people.
Serial-killer was about half the classes I've been to in 4 years of CS, and that's not counting groups just hanging around campus talking about "him". I've been a "him" quite often. That I haven't committed violence doesn't stop anyone else from threats or actions. A woman attacking me would make me primary aggressor and give them all the excuse they need. This is reality, and you're siding with them in presuming this is a serious matter for males. You'll find out whenever a chick is in the mood to ruin your life.
You're blinded by your own prejudice. Seriously say, "A woman's face justifies her being assaulted, and she shouldn't care what a majority of bigots think or what out of their prejudice they even do to her." If you really think that about men, it shouldn't be a problem to post the same about women. Rather betting you wouldn't dare.
My face is usually blank. I'm called "serial-killer" for entering classrooms and sitting down. I genuinely grin, and it's called "rape face". You're not reading my face in text, Schizo-moron, nor would you be saying this shit to a woman to handwave assault, Sexist-filth.
Misanthropy is a sport here. That's not what's sticking in your craw. Criticism of men get interesting, informative, even funny here. Replying negatively will even get you off-topic. It's criticism of women that always gets flamebait and usually troll, and, if the poster's male, the resident psychics always divine something wrong with him.
No one in my life could ever read me. Besides, the women were openly the aggressors and clearly consciously gender-privileged, pulling all the misandrous tricks in the book in full public view. Were they afraid they'd not have done anything like what they did. They were physically threatening, even actually committing assault, yet playing victim the whole time. Not once in my life has anyone ever had a problem with their aggressions against me. Those that didn't awkwardly pretend it wasn't happening will back them in their unprovoked aggression, while implying my very presence justified it. You just proved no different. This isn't just prejudicial thought, but you're reducing even actions to nothing because I'm male. You wouldn't be making such excuses, if I were female. How dare you support such blatant sexism under then pretense of being the voice positivity.
Yeah, those women are psychic thus fully justified in their misandry. Thanks for clearing that up.
Guess that'd make me a feminist.
Have you considered it's your clothing, hairstyle, lack of glasses, and facial hair that are giving these impressions to people?
Not appearing like some pre-approved subculture drone isn't giving people impressions. They're quite prejudiced on their own, which was my point. General society is a loaded situation for a male, and women are holding the gun.
Incidentally, soul-patches will get you openly sneered at by women. It specifically increases your acceptable target rating. Showing even a little teeth specially gets called my "rape face", so that's a really bad idea. Widening from the "evil grin" goes into Joker territory.
Well, knowing you're at a socially mandated disadvantage by their presence, and any one could go psycho-bitch to various degrees of impunity leaving you with no safe recourse. I'm built and mean looking (thanks to Hollywood's image indoctrination and my facial structure). Men generally don't start shit with me, though they'll often whisper "serial-killer" when I first walk, stand, or sit in their vicinity. Women outright target me. They get in my face and call me creepy, while clearly expecting me to leave her holy presence dutifully shamed. Hell, the older fatter ones get rapey up to what would be legally punishable sexual assault, were it gender reversed. No one cares. That's pretty intimidating. Ironically, generally worse than cops, and they're postured at me in pack and grabbed guns while glaring at me walk down a sidewalk or out of college's main exit.
Why? It works. It's profitable.
I'd image there's a lot of unlucky people then. Certainly, no one wants to pay me for anything I'd ever realistically care to do.
H-1B workers are about cheapness not talents or skill. They fake not having skilled workers by demanding grab bags of overly specific skills, for IT positions often in specific software packages that didn't even exist for the years of experience they're demanding. Read most any job listing. HR's both incompetent and deceitful.
I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the states where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so.
My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union.
I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races. I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of making voters or jurors of Negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people. There is a physical difference between the white and black races, which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality.
I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I, as much as any other man, am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race.
Abraham fuckin' Lincoln
The North was racist as fuck all. Slavery was only out of fashion not a grand moral issue. Beating up the wrong kinda white people was literally open humor into the 20th century. The Nazis copied eugenics from the US. How libtarded are you?
What you find irritating is irrelevant when accurate. The industry was male-dominated. This was declared sexist thus the current pissing away money and fucking over the males specifically and the industry generally to make way for females who couldn't hack it to begin with who think they're special. Of course, those females tend to piss off those already in the industry who could, but that's easily shouted down by the likes of you.
You do know feminists have their own lexicon? "Sexism" by their usage isn't actually sexism. Like how "male privilege" doesn't require a male to have any privileges. I'm serious. Check with the "gender studies" department. They'll explain exactly this.
Intuitive groking is more important that formulaic recitation. Rhetorical "elite" tend to ignore useful semantics for meaningless syntax. Form is more important to them than accuracy or usefulness.
Ever tried dating those women who hold grammar and spelling as indicators of intellect? They're vapid and rule-lawyer-esque sleazy. In faux intellectual discussion, they'll correct your expression based on their personal aesthetics and their preferred subculture's PCness not fact or logic. The best at fact and logic are usually "sloppy" dorks, mostly male. Would say it's ironic, but at this point, it's just fucked and not funny anymore.
Good luck with that. Aside from the being caught cheating even by their own rules, which is impressive given how circular they are, that guy who actually managed to get them in court for their policy being unconstitutional was explicitly rejected on the basis of IRS policy itself, as in the Constitution only matters if IRS policy says so. Not being a lawyer, I'm still not sure why the judge said he raised good points, while the case was found against him by some IRS guy and not the judge. Apparently by some special rules, they're functionally their own judge too. They'd have to agree to dismantle themselves now.
You'd have to assume you already know most everything about the population, and that's it's grossly homogeneous. They precisely don't know what they'd have to know to here to make the assumptions they're making, and they're ignoring other sources of contrary data though that's par for them.
Stealing and threating is politics. It's the source and maintenance of all nationstates and all official regions thereof. Are you claiming all governments currently in existence are illegitimate?
Being an idiot with no reading comprehension doesn't make people talking over your head a troll. Not that you can comprehend that...
Silly, feminists make it quite clear. Rape victims are better off dead. They just don't like it when you say it that way...
Not if you count "forced to penetrate". They don't even count non-vaginal penetration in my state. Your assumption's based on intentionally skewed definitions attempting to bury male victims, but what's new?
And this had to do with the Union's motivation how? The North didn't really give a shit. Some unauthorized dumbass started the shooting. The politicians in the North used that as an excuse because they didn't want to lose land and resources. When that petered out, the North wanted the bloodshed over. Only then did the anti-slavery propaganda get thrown on the fire in attempt to fuel the continuation of the war.
You do recall the North still had slave states till after the damn war? How about where the race riots eventually occurred? Racism against the wrong kind of white was perfectly normal up there on into inventing eugenics before the Nazis. The Northern majority didn't remotely care enough about slavery to fight a war. Lincoln himself just wanted the black people out of the country( and massively unconstitutional dictatorial power, which should sound familiar).
The war wasn't the grand moral gesture ignorant shitheads like you love to wank over. It was about arrogant greedy federal overreach from the North intruding upon rival power "clubs" in the South, who were just expected to roll over, and the resulting backlash when they didn't.
Your spell-checker? Pretty sure none of the misspelled entities lost anything, so it couldn't be them...