"2.3 times smaller" would mean divide. Larger is directional. I've never heard "times larger" used otherwise. Neither the Charlottean transplants nor my Appalachian relatives were ever confused about that.
For what? Orgies? Oh, wait those aren't in fashion this century. Do swinging count yet? Males usually need a partner for that though. Hookup culture? That's expensive in time and resources, unless you're a very pretty male, and, even if you're the bank, you're still the entertainment unless the girl's actually got kinks for that (as opposed to the majority of dom chicks who like to play a very fake sub while controlling the entire scene, just like most any vanilla coyness shtick), so the porn's better there anyway.
Funny, how the two "problems" require action of the male in lieu of action the female, usually entirely in the first one and mostly in the second. So would depriving females of these privileges result in any adaptive behavior to balance that ancient unbalance, or will we just get more bitching about the lack of "good men" since any that ironically don't find them worth servicing are by definition "bad"?
Wish I had points. I thought exactly that. I've know Alzheimer's victims that weren't diagnosed till very late due to people ignoring cynical me, while viewing them with mindless uncriticality. Same thing happens with happy idiots in general, either conformists or pretty/charming/etc. socially-privileged types. They just get away with their idiocy, even actively inflicting it on unspecial others, while the consequences are generally out right denied, and anyone calling them on it is immediately attacked and discredited.
There are things worse than death. Unsurprisingly, the acute ones require life. The chronic ones require time. Living longer just facilitates more acute and chronic negatives, often with less and less likely positives. Basically, there's rarely a point in being an old cynic, due to being old, not to being a cynic. Survival is means only. We cynics know that better than anyone.
Citation needed. Where is proof one of any real Rabbi Yahshua? Josephus only mentioned a "Christ" figure in passing to differentiate which person called "Jesus" he was referring to at the time and not at all in his larger work on the region. He only wrote sometime after CE 71, and all copies we got came from Christian monks in the 11th century. That's the closest to a real historical claim you get.
You're missing popularity too. Remember the most common difference between creepy and charming is how the guy is viewed. Look how they try to blame video games for violence, despite just accepting sport hoodlums, and video games aren't even remotely niche anymore. The (actual) nerd is a safe goto target, especially for women, and knows it.
CDC says "forced to penetrate" alone equals (being penetrated) "rape" in terms of annual rate. There's a difference for long past, but men are 5 times less likely to admit any sexual abuse, even documented, so it skews heavily over time. You lose admissions for male victims much more than female victims. You'd have to apply some multiplier to reports of long past victimization to guess at the real number, but they can't explain away the 12 month numbers at all though, and that didn't include any "rape" numbers for men, just their "forced to penetrate" category.
That usually results in creepshaming if you're really "one of them" as opposed to "geek chic", which any conversation will make immediately obvious. You might just quietly get laughed off as she walks away from the subhuman that actually spoke to her, of course.
You can't speak to women like they're just people. They get offended, and you should be ashamed, just because they're offended. Don't dare argue either. It just proves you're the creep you've just been labeled as. You need to "know how to talk to women" not mere people. Now go alter your lifestyle to fit what's popular with women. Otherwise, you've got nothing to complain about, Freak.
I never know what they're calling themselves. Orthopedics probably should be the word, but any with that name have always been worthless personally. Took 10 years to get diagnosed with arthritis, even though it was then obvious and systemic but not degenerative thus didn't suddenly show up for the late diagnosis. Was an actual chiropractor that bothered to finally diagnose my scoliosis with an "unsutured" vertebrae at the base of the S which is obvious in x-ray since he simply bothered to do actually do one. I didn't hang around for adjustments though. Last experience with anyone remotely competent in such areas was called "sports medicine" for some damn reason. Little guy freaked at the though of a double bodyweight back-squat with no knowledge of my back, just my age. All I had then was an ankle sprain, just done the harder way. I'm not convinced there's any specific official position or title consistently competent in this stuff.
Because MD don't do everything DOs do. You'd need to get referred to the PT/chiropractor by the MD instead of the DO doing it themselves as the grandpost stated. The MDs used to reject that kind of thing and occasionally still do. Politics favored them, so they didn't lose face for being wrong. Seriously, they have much more state backing, so they retain supremacy regardless of the actual medicine. Compare to psychology, try debunking any of the many falsified/unfalsifiable APA trends and see how quickly no politician cares, and they fully retain special rights to have you committed without any court involvement. Not to call MDs quacks, but it was always rigged.
Spindoctored state propaganda. Ignore that in mythology. It's where culture goes to die. Romans quickly became boring and predictable. Politics turned Set and Baal into their own enemies, while the Egyptians and a certain sect of pretentious self-hating Canaanites became boring and predictable. It's a pattern. When Christendom ate paganism, what did we get? Spindoctored state propaganda with a boring and predictable abortion as/of a culture.
Yeah, but their policies don't align with yours after they're elected, if they even remotely pretended they did. Actual democracy would be worse if you've ever seen polls. Most people are proudly ignorant and authoritarian as fuck. Sheeple-farming, which already shapes the psychological landscape to shape the political, would just intensify too. The stringpullers and their spindoctors and mindfuckers usually aren't actually in office themselves, so you can't remove them.
Yeah, government regulation clearly doesn't make them just the parent company of a now larger megacorp with its policies enforced as law and its own military-industrial complex that openly serves it's business interests. Politicians aren't just particularly incompetent and corrupt executives after all. Only silly paranoid conspiracy nuts would ever think such things. Who really wants to record all your personal phone conversations, track your grocery bills, or kill you over meta-data, right?
I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and in the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers which are not granted; and on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted. For why declare that things shall not be done which there is no power to do? Why for instance, should it be said, that the liberty of the press shall not be restrained, when no power is given by which restrictions may be imposed? I will not contend that such a provision would confer a regulating power; but it is evident that it would furnish, to men disposed to usurp, a plausible pretense for claiming that power.
Germany might not be among the worst, but there are increasingly chauvinistic feminist laws in the EU with decreased notoriety and resistance. German laws specifically include things like "libel" being any intentionally negative publicity regardless of truth: "insult" with true statements is a category of illegal defamation. I'd image combining the former EU issue with the latter German specific issues is going to get far nastier in the near future.
So the US State is unrealistic, and this circularly authorizes corruption to literally be law? I'm pretty sure that'd just make law unrealistic, but then the terms de facto and de jure do exist for a reason...
Yeah, self-righteous moralfagging clearly makes you right about technical matters. Let me guess "nice" people are smart, and "rude" people are stupid? The "nice" people get to define "nice" and "rude" because they're "nice", which makes them right because arbitrary standards written by sleaze and majoritarian idiots to control social interaction for their petty-political purposes define intellect, logic, and fact.
Yep, but cops and university staff don't like punishing female offenders, so raising awareness of the problem's the only option. The resistance that always results is awfully telling.
Slashdot Mirror
Goodthink got it.
"2.3 times smaller" would mean divide. Larger is directional. I've never heard "times larger" used otherwise. Neither the Charlottean transplants nor my Appalachian relatives were ever confused about that.
For what? Orgies? Oh, wait those aren't in fashion this century. Do swinging count yet? Males usually need a partner for that though. Hookup culture? That's expensive in time and resources, unless you're a very pretty male, and, even if you're the bank, you're still the entertainment unless the girl's actually got kinks for that (as opposed to the majority of dom chicks who like to play a very fake sub while controlling the entire scene, just like most any vanilla coyness shtick), so the porn's better there anyway.
Funny, how the two "problems" require action of the male in lieu of action the female, usually entirely in the first one and mostly in the second. So would depriving females of these privileges result in any adaptive behavior to balance that ancient unbalance, or will we just get more bitching about the lack of "good men" since any that ironically don't find them worth servicing are by definition "bad"?
Wish I had points. I thought exactly that. I've know Alzheimer's victims that weren't diagnosed till very late due to people ignoring cynical me, while viewing them with mindless uncriticality. Same thing happens with happy idiots in general, either conformists or pretty/charming/etc. socially-privileged types. They just get away with their idiocy, even actively inflicting it on unspecial others, while the consequences are generally out right denied, and anyone calling them on it is immediately attacked and discredited.
There are things worse than death. Unsurprisingly, the acute ones require life. The chronic ones require time. Living longer just facilitates more acute and chronic negatives, often with less and less likely positives. Basically, there's rarely a point in being an old cynic, due to being old, not to being a cynic. Survival is means only. We cynics know that better than anyone.
Citation needed. Where is proof one of any real Rabbi Yahshua? Josephus only mentioned a "Christ" figure in passing to differentiate which person called "Jesus" he was referring to at the time and not at all in his larger work on the region. He only wrote sometime after CE 71, and all copies we got came from Christian monks in the 11th century. That's the closest to a real historical claim you get.
You're missing popularity too. Remember the most common difference between creepy and charming is how the guy is viewed. Look how they try to blame video games for violence, despite just accepting sport hoodlums, and video games aren't even remotely niche anymore. The (actual) nerd is a safe goto target, especially for women, and knows it.
CDC says "forced to penetrate" alone equals (being penetrated) "rape" in terms of annual rate. There's a difference for long past, but men are 5 times less likely to admit any sexual abuse, even documented, so it skews heavily over time. You lose admissions for male victims much more than female victims. You'd have to apply some multiplier to reports of long past victimization to guess at the real number, but they can't explain away the 12 month numbers at all though, and that didn't include any "rape" numbers for men, just their "forced to penetrate" category.
That usually results in creepshaming if you're really "one of them" as opposed to "geek chic", which any conversation will make immediately obvious. You might just quietly get laughed off as she walks away from the subhuman that actually spoke to her, of course.
You can't speak to women like they're just people. They get offended, and you should be ashamed, just because they're offended. Don't dare argue either. It just proves you're the creep you've just been labeled as. You need to "know how to talk to women" not mere people. Now go alter your lifestyle to fit what's popular with women. Otherwise, you've got nothing to complain about, Freak.
But only one is an acceptable target writ large.
Pah, women are always special though, so contradictions are allowed. Have you never PC-sexismed before?
I never know what they're calling themselves. Orthopedics probably should be the word, but any with that name have always been worthless personally. Took 10 years to get diagnosed with arthritis, even though it was then obvious and systemic but not degenerative thus didn't suddenly show up for the late diagnosis. Was an actual chiropractor that bothered to finally diagnose my scoliosis with an "unsutured" vertebrae at the base of the S which is obvious in x-ray since he simply bothered to do actually do one. I didn't hang around for adjustments though. Last experience with anyone remotely competent in such areas was called "sports medicine" for some damn reason. Little guy freaked at the though of a double bodyweight back-squat with no knowledge of my back, just my age. All I had then was an ankle sprain, just done the harder way. I'm not convinced there's any specific official position or title consistently competent in this stuff.
Because MD don't do everything DOs do. You'd need to get referred to the PT/chiropractor by the MD instead of the DO doing it themselves as the grandpost stated. The MDs used to reject that kind of thing and occasionally still do. Politics favored them, so they didn't lose face for being wrong. Seriously, they have much more state backing, so they retain supremacy regardless of the actual medicine. Compare to psychology, try debunking any of the many falsified/unfalsifiable APA trends and see how quickly no politician cares, and they fully retain special rights to have you committed without any court involvement. Not to call MDs quacks, but it was always rigged.
So you see nothing wrong with Newspeak as long as it's popular?
Spindoctored state propaganda. Ignore that in mythology. It's where culture goes to die. Romans quickly became boring and predictable. Politics turned Set and Baal into their own enemies, while the Egyptians and a certain sect of pretentious self-hating Canaanites became boring and predictable. It's a pattern. When Christendom ate paganism, what did we get? Spindoctored state propaganda with a boring and predictable abortion as/of a culture.
Yeah, but their policies don't align with yours after they're elected, if they even remotely pretended they did. Actual democracy would be worse if you've ever seen polls. Most people are proudly ignorant and authoritarian as fuck. Sheeple-farming, which already shapes the psychological landscape to shape the political, would just intensify too. The stringpullers and their spindoctors and mindfuckers usually aren't actually in office themselves, so you can't remove them.
Yeah, government regulation clearly doesn't make them just the parent company of a now larger megacorp with its policies enforced as law and its own military-industrial complex that openly serves it's business interests. Politicians aren't just particularly incompetent and corrupt executives after all. Only silly paranoid conspiracy nuts would ever think such things. Who really wants to record all your personal phone conversations, track your grocery bills, or kill you over meta-data, right?
What's he going to do? Run back to Zeus and whine again till he gets sterilized?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federalist_No._84
I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and in the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers which are not granted; and on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted. For why declare that things shall not be done which there is no power to do? Why for instance, should it be said, that the liberty of the press shall not be restrained, when no power is given by which restrictions may be imposed? I will not contend that such a provision would confer a regulating power; but it is evident that it would furnish, to men disposed to usurp, a plausible pretense for claiming that power.
Germany might not be among the worst, but there are increasingly chauvinistic feminist laws in the EU with decreased notoriety and resistance. German laws specifically include things like "libel" being any intentionally negative publicity regardless of truth: "insult" with true statements is a category of illegal defamation. I'd image combining the former EU issue with the latter German specific issues is going to get far nastier in the near future.
So the US State is unrealistic, and this circularly authorizes corruption to literally be law? I'm pretty sure that'd just make law unrealistic, but then the terms de facto and de jure do exist for a reason...
You better be female then.
Yeah, self-righteous moralfagging clearly makes you right about technical matters. Let me guess "nice" people are smart, and "rude" people are stupid? The "nice" people get to define "nice" and "rude" because they're "nice", which makes them right because arbitrary standards written by sleaze and majoritarian idiots to control social interaction for their petty-political purposes define intellect, logic, and fact.
Yep, but cops and university staff don't like punishing female offenders, so raising awareness of the problem's the only option. The resistance that always results is awfully telling.