Slashdot Mirror


Male Scent Molecules May Be Compromising Biomedical Research

sciencehabit (1205606) writes "Scientists have found that mice feel 36% less pain when a male researcher is in the room, versus a female researcher. The rodents are also less stressed out. The effect appears to be due to scent molecules that male mammals (including humans, dogs, and cats) have been emitting for eons. The finding could help explain why some labs have trouble replicating the results of others, and it could cause a reevaluation of decades of animal experiments: everything from the effectiveness of experimental drugs to the ability of monkeys to do math. Male odor could even influence human clinical trials."

274 comments

  1. Also, this means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    No more need to wear deodorant. My naturally musky smell will make everyone feel more at ease.

    1. Re:Also, this means... by Muros · · Score: 5, Informative

      No more need to wear deodorant. My naturally musky smell will make everyone feel more at ease.

      Unfortunately, the summary is incorrect. The article says the mice are more stressed with males around.

    2. Re:Also, this means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, your reading comprehension sucks and the summary is correct. From the end of the fourth paragraph in the fucking article (emphasis mine):

      The rodents showed significantly fewer signs of pain (an average of a 36% lower score on the grimace scale) when a male researcher was in the room than when a female researcher—or no researcher at all—was there.

    3. Re:Also, this means... by Muros · · Score: 2

      No, your reading comprehension sucks and the summary is correct. From the end of the fourth paragraph in the fucking article (emphasis mine):

      The rodents showed significantly fewer signs of pain (an average of a 36% lower score on the grimace scale) when a male researcher was in the room than when a female researcher—or no researcher at all—was there.

      Read as far as the sixth paragraph.

    4. Re:Also, this means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you misread yourself! Stress, not pain.

      Further testing showed that the rodents exposed to male odors were actually feeling less pain, rather than simply hiding the pain they were in. The male aroma ramped up their stress levels, which deadened the hurt.

    5. Re:Also, this means... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 4, Informative

      I found plain old alcohol superior to deodorant in every way.

      Amazing stuff. It strips the built up oils and wax on the hair off and kills the bacteria too.

      I found a lot of deodorants actually made me smell worse when they broke down.

      Only down side is on a hot day- I might have to do this again every six hours. But deodorant doesn't even last six hours on me.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    6. Re:Also, this means... by i+kan+reed · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Stress and lack of pain are both associated with adrenaline, so I'd say that's a totally plausible thing.

    7. Re:Also, this means... by boristdog · · Score: 5, Funny

      How much do you have to drink to get this effect?

    8. Re:Also, this means... by postbigbang · · Score: 2

      One could test for ACTH, another hormone that is often co-morbid with adrenaline as a stress reaction. That would seal the deal: animals are in fear, stressed, and are ready for men to do bad things to them. Women are comparatively harmless, as a result, in terms of invoking stress, were both adrenal and ACTH products present. Ought to be an easy test.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    9. Re:Also, this means... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 5, Funny

      It varies but it also improves my dancing and my kung fu skills.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    10. Re:Also, this means... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      why are you confusing stress with showing pain?
      Anyway, this is a better quote:
      " The male aroma ramped up their stress levels, which deadened the hurt. “It’s really astounding that such a robust effect could have been missed for so many years,” Mogil says."

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    11. Re:Also, this means... by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      I have realized I play pool very well when I am drunk, and very poorly when sober.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    12. Re:Also, this means... by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      If nature were perfect we wouldn't be here.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    13. Re:Also, this means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This can be true: Skills you learn while drunk you will be able to perform better while drunk than sober.

    14. Re:Also, this means... by budgenator · · Score: 1

      That's called modal learning and it's a real thing, but it's also likely your over-estimating your skill when drunk (most of us do). Modal learning associated with drink is also seen in bowlers and golfers.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    15. Re:Also, this means... by Kiffer · · Score: 2

      State Dependent Memory.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S...

      If you learn to play while drunk you improve your skills while drunk but not while sober.
      In order to be good while sober you need to learn while sober.
      The fun part is that you learn lots of things while in different states.
      You learn to do something only while heavily caffeinated/drunk/high? Then it only comes to you easily while you are caffeinated, drunk or high...
      Caffeine and coding.
      Drink and darts.

    16. Re:Also, this means... by Jmc23 · · Score: 5, Informative
      No, it's not. Modal has to do with different modes of learning, weird how it's exactly what it says eh?

      State specific or dependent memory is what you are looking for, which strangely enough has to do with the state of mind you're in.

      Weird how words work like that, eh?

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    17. Re:Also, this means... by Your.Master · · Score: 2

      He was quoting:

      My naturally musky smell will make everyone feel more at ease.

      Stress is the opposite of at ease.

      I agree that the summary was not really incorrect though, though I think it could have included the sentence you quoted.

    18. Re:Also, this means... by mlyle · · Score: 2

      The summary is correct about reduced pain. It's backwards about stress level:

      Further testing showed that the rodents exposed to male odors were actually feeling less pain, rather than simply hiding the pain they were in. The male aroma ramped up their stress levels, which deadened the hurt. “It’s really astounding that such a robust effect could have been missed for so many years,” Mogil says.

      vs.

      The rodents are also less stressed out.

    19. Re:Also, this means... by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      Oh wait, I can't read. Yes, even the summary was incorrect. It said they were both less in pain and less stressed. But the article said they were less in pain and MORE stressed, and figured that the latter causes the former.

    20. Re:Also, this means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, mice are pretty much perfect at being mice, but it seems they might make pretty poor analogs of human beings.

    21. Re:Also, this means... by drinkypoo · · Score: 0

      Weird how words work like that, eh?

      It's weirder when they don't, like how electorate means voters and not people who elect. Especially when you live in an Oligopoly masquerading as a Republic masquerading as a Democracy.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    22. Re:Also, this means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [Alcohol is] Amazing stuff. It strips the built up oils and wax on the hair off and kills the bacteria too.

      Beware, alcohol also dries your skin.

    23. Re:Also, this means... by dinfinity · · Score: 2

      Citric acid works even better. I can go for two to three days without reapplying my citric acid solution and have done so for the past three years.

      If you search online, you'll encounter all kinds of 'rub lemons under your armpits' and comparable tips. The more scientific approach is of course to just buy a kilo of crystallized citric acid for a few euro's and then mix it with water until you reach a pH-level slightly above 2.0 (buy some cheap indicator paper). Put it in a spray bottle and there you go.

      You won't smell like musk or chocolate or 'ice shock', or whatever the fuck you're supposed to smell like with commercial deodorants nowadays. You'll just smell like (the rest of) yourself.

      If nothing else, you can always use the bag of citric acid to make lemonade (add sugar and water) or as an easy seasoning agent (not surprisingly quite tasty on chicken and fish). It's also a fairly effective cleaning agent, removing oil and fats and also functions as a fabric softener (in the traditional sense of removing soap residues). Did I mention that it has a fungicidal effect (effective against athlete's foot, given diligent use)?

      Disclaimers:
      1. You need to find a pH-level that works and that does not irritate your skin (pH 3.0 will probably not kill all the bacteria and pH 1.0 will probably strip your skin). Whether you decide to go from a very low pH and move up or the other way around is a matter of whether you can afford to stink for a few days.
      2. Water droplets are not aerosols.
      3. The layer of dead skin cells (stratum corneum) is temporarily removed by the citric acid. This means that in the first few hours after applying the solution, your skin will be more sensitive. Under your armpits, that isn't really a problem, but it has been advised against to go sunbathing when having applied citric acid to the skin.

    24. Re:Also, this means... by ruir · · Score: 1

      Do not use deodorants then. There are natural alternatives that dont cause cancer, but there are no interest in making the general public aware of them, because you only spend $1-$2 a year instead of $3 every so few weeks. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A... There are several brands, even in the USA you can find it. Moroccans still use it widely, as far as I know. The slab/stone form is cheaper than when it is sold in a nice plastic container like the deodorant ($2-$4 price range against $8-$20). The later form is better for travelling, or carrying it with you.

    25. Re:Also, this means... by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      old spice used to have alcohol in their deodorant. I figured that out quick when I had a cut in my armpit one day...

    26. Re:Also, this means... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Thanks,

      I've been using it for many years now with no bad side effects.
      I only use it once a day most of the year. Perhaps people with naturally dry skin might have a problem.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    27. Re:Also, this means... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      I tried the crystal slab. It didn't work for me. It worked about as well as deodorants-- which make sense since it is a similar aluminum based product.

      It was weird too because it left my armpits feeling "dry" when I showered. It took a few weeks to completely get rid of that feeling from my arm pits so it was persistent.

      I discovered the rubbing alcohol and was amazed. It's also cheap cheap cheap. Like $2 for 3 months. I can see how the slab would be easier to travel with. I had to buy some special tiny spray bottles under the TSA size limits.

      I read use of rubbing alcohol used to be much more common in the 50s but advertising lead people to more expensive (and for me less effective) products.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    28. Re:Also, this means... by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      I found plain old alcohol superior to deodorant in every way.

      Amazing stuff. It strips the built up oils and wax on the hair off and kills the bacteria too.

      I found a lot of deodorants actually made me smell worse when they broke down.

      Only down side is on a hot day- I might have to do this again every six hours. But deodorant doesn't even last six hours on me.

      Yup. 91% rubbing alcohol on the pits. Trim now and then.

      Dries stuff out. Kills everything. EXACTLY what I want going on in my pits. Plus, cheap as hell and won't stain clothes or cause reactions from people sensitive to scents.

    29. Re:Also, this means... by ruir · · Score: 1

      I used to have a very strong odor, still have to this day...one things that work for me, it to keep the hair under the armpits cut/trimmed. Then it is far easier to care of the rest.

    30. Re:Also, this means... by mattr · · Score: 1

      Correct, I found the same thing when I tried a deodorant that was basically just alcohol.
      Deodorants is one thing I carefully read the label on everything. Stay away from stuff with aluminum and if possible zinc. Stay away from that crazy shit with propane in it (one of the AXE products) that says don't go near flame!! I also stay away as much as i can from petroleum byproducts.
      Fact is, alcohol works better than all of this stuff because as far as I can tell it kills the bacteria that make you smell. It was sold in a small glass bottle with roller sphere and I can never find it anywhere ever again.
      You may notice that popular brands sold in all the stores actually have extremely different ingredients lists within the same brand even.
      I go by what irritates but I'd like to see somewhere that actually takes it all apart with someone who understands chemistry and the body.

    31. Re:Also, this means... by mattr · · Score: 1

      p.s. I would like to add that if by some chance someone could share names of alcohol based deodorants and someone could reverse engineer their ingredients into an OPEN SOURCE product I would totally prefer to make it myself, if possible, and avoid putting all kinds of nasty things on (a number of soaps irritate too). Anybody out there? I even read somewhere that petroleum products are used in food (fast food I guess) and am I the only one who has once or twice smelled petroleum fumes in urine? (Yeah gross but on the other hand, what the fuck is up with that! We should be open sourcing all this stuff to try and avoid what might turn into toxins or unhealthy chemicals in the body, and i don't mean replacing food or going nuts. I'd like to also hear from an expert whether any of these products are really dangerous and why some may be irritating if they aren't. My $0.02.

    32. Re:Also, this means... by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      Caffeine, too? I hadn't heard about that one. So if I sometimes code at work sober, sometimes code in the evening with a beer, and sometimes code late at night with extra caffeine, I'm forcing myself to relearn the same skills in three environments?

      Sheesh, I might as well take up underwater skydiving coding, too.

    33. Re:Also, this means... by dave420 · · Score: 1

      The electorate does elect people, by voting for them. A republic can be a democracy, and a democracy can be a republic - they are not mutually exclusive. You seem to have some difficulty with words :)

      So yeah - weird.

    34. Re:Also, this means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love the smell of male sweat. OTOH the smell of most deodorants makes me want to throw up. I guess I'm a mouse.

    35. Re:Also, this means... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Thanks! Very useful information.

      I've come to view most commercial deodorants as not only wasteful but overly expensive and some potentially dangerous due to the aluminum.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    36. Re:Also, this means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chemical dependant learning. If you stay up cramming for a final all night in college drinking coffe/mountain dew/caffeinated beverage of your choice then it would behoove you to have a cup right befor the test.

  2. Scent molecules? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shower more, filthy nerds :D

  3. Molecules shmolecules by chinton · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe the male scientists need to shower more often...

    1. Re:Molecules shmolecules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno man, if it increases pain tolerance, we might want dudes to shower less often in some fields...

    2. Re:Molecules shmolecules by budgenator · · Score: 2

      Your assuming that it's a smell that can be washed off, the implication of the article is the way to get rid of the smell is to cut off your testicles.

      Bedding material from unfamiliar male mice and guinea pigs, as well as pet beds slept in by unsterilized male cats and dogs, produced the same response:

      Might be interesting to test if females evoke an effect depending on where they are in their estrous cycle, seeing that it is more of a pheromonal thing than an odor thing.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    3. Re:Molecules shmolecules by wanax · · Score: 2

      There's a huge bias towards using exclusively male mice in many types of research, and the issue of higher variance in female rodent behavior (due to estrous cycle issues, among others) is well known (see eg: pdf).

      There are also related problems more generally with stress and over-training in neuroscience. Experienced investigators are able to produce a much less stressful working environment for animals, so they tend to get different results from neophyte investigators even when following the same protocol. This shows up a lot when a different lab tries to replicate the work of an experienced post-doc and gets null results for the first 6 months then suddenly is able to replicate everything. Thus often is attributed to 'correcting' the protocol (often with extensive communication with the previous lab) when often I think the change is attributable to the investigator in the replicating lab becoming experienced enough to relieve stress (I don't have a great link for this, mostly just an observation from having been around quite a few labs).

      Over-training is also a problem, since it often takes thousands (sometimes well into the hundreds of) to train animals in complex cognitive tasks, and it's well known from experiments in humans (and a few in non-human primate and rodent) that neural responses shift profoundly between 'trained' and 'over-trained' states, say between amateur and professional ballerinas watching videos of ballet.

      However, these issues are a much bigger problem in pre-clinical research than in basic research. Our understanding of the brain is sufficiently limited that the effects we're used to seeing in basic research questions swamp the potential modulation from gender, stress and training factors (unless you're talking about stress research specifically, but they're pretty careful about controlling for these types of effect). The issue with pre-clinical research is that often the difference between the current treatment and proposed treatment is only a few percent (note: if valid, this can mean thousands of lives saved or hugely improved), and so failing to identify and control for factors such as researcher or mouse gender can overwhelm the supposed primary result.

    4. Re:Molecules shmolecules by Reziac · · Score: 1

      "Experienced investigators are able to produce a much less stressful working environment for animals, so they tend to get different results from neophyte investigators even when following the same protocol."

      This doesn't surprise me in the least. You'll see the same among dog trainers (my profession) where an old hand and a novice will *appear* to be doing the same things, but the dogs react very differently (so the old hand makes rapid progress, while the novice struggles to achieve the same results). Also, dogs trained by men tend to be more relaxed than dogs trained by women, even when they're following the same methods and applications (ie. protocols).

      As a general rule, when an alpha male is present, everyone acts more self-controlled (including reduced reactions to pain); this appears to be hardwired, as it's broadly true in mammals. Putting a female in the same position makes the other animals more reactive (which likely includes more reaction to pain).

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  4. Captain Obvoius by coinreturn · · Score: 5, Funny

    Women are intimidating and cause stress. Film at 11.

    1. Re:Captain Obvoius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      If by "imtimidating" you meant "sexy", and by "stress" you meant "erections", I'm right there with you, buddy.

    2. Re:Captain Obvoius by wile_e_wonka · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      If by "imtimidating" you meant "sexy", and by "stress" you meant "erections", I'm right there with you, buddy.

      This only applies to a small percentage of women.

      Women are intimidating and cause stress.

      This applies to approximately 100% of women (including the subset of sexy women), so, no, coinreturn had it right.

    3. Re:Captain Obvoius by tylikcat · · Score: 1

      ...though in fact, it's men that do. (The summary is wrong.)

    4. Re:Captain Obvoius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If by "imtimidating" you meant "sexy", and by "stress" you meant "erections", I'm right there with you, buddy.

      Get married. See how long that lasts. Buddy.

    5. Re:Captain Obvoius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you considered it's your clothing, hairstyle, lack of glasses, and facial hair that are giving these impressions to people?

      Put these on: http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/dam/assets/140128102959-lok-segall-new-google-glass-frames-00000501-story-top.jpg
      Stop shopping here: http://www.hottopic.com/hottopic/Homepage.jsp
      Start shopping here: http://www.ae.com/web/index.jsp
      Grow one of these: http://www.ftmguide.org/images/soulpatch.gif
      Put one of these under your arm: store.apple.com/macbook-air
      Or carry one of these in a felt case: https://www.apple.com/ipad-air/

      Worst case: shave the mustache and show teeth when you smile(even if you think you have bad teeth)
      http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=spot_the_pedo

      I guarantee no one gives those reactions to SF valley hipster douche-bags regardless of their facial expressions. Even if they are built like a tank.

    6. Re:Captain Obvoius by king+neckbeard · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think you grossly underestimate how low the standards of many men actually are. The requirements are pretty much just a pulse, and even that has some wiggle room.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    7. Re:Captain Obvoius by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I think you grossly underestimate how low the standards of many men actually are. The requirements are pretty much just a pulse, and even that has some wiggle room.

      A theory easily verified by a trip to your local Wal-Mart.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    8. Re:Captain Obvoius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't call me buddy, pal.

    9. Re:Captain Obvoius by Nephandus · · Score: 0

      Have you considered it's your clothing, hairstyle, lack of glasses, and facial hair that are giving these impressions to people?

      Not appearing like some pre-approved subculture drone isn't giving people impressions. They're quite prejudiced on their own, which was my point. General society is a loaded situation for a male, and women are holding the gun.

      Incidentally, soul-patches will get you openly sneered at by women. It specifically increases your acceptable target rating. Showing even a little teeth specially gets called my "rape face", so that's a really bad idea. Widening from the "evil grin" goes into Joker territory.

      --
      "A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head."
    10. Re:Captain Obvoius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If by "imtimidating" you meant "sexy", and by "stress" you meant "erections", I'm right there with you, buddy.

      Clearly this was either written by a 13 year old boy or a heterosexual woman.

    11. Re:Captain Obvoius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't call me pal, friend!

    12. Re:Captain Obvoius by reboot246 · · Score: 0

      I not sure if that's exactly true. When a doctor is giving me a shot, it tends to hurt less if the doctor is female.

      Or maybe it's because I'm male and I am in the room.

    13. Re:Captain Obvoius by HornWumpus · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Beauty is just a light switch away. Best part; in total darkness, I'm as handsome as she is beautiful.

      Pardon me miss: Did you know that I look just like Brad Pitt in total darkness?

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    14. Re:Captain Obvoius by geekoid · · Score: 0

      Sex in the dark is boring.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    15. Re:Captain Obvoius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Go fist yourself.

    16. Re:Captain Obvoius by geekoid · · Score: 0

      "Incidentally, soul-patches will get you openly sneered at by women."

      Finally, someone who can speak for all women....

      sheesh.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    17. Re:Captain Obvoius by HornWumpus · · Score: 0

      You're doing it wrong.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    18. Re:Captain Obvoius by Nephandus · · Score: 1

      Guess that'd make me a feminist.

      --
      "A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head."
    19. Re:Captain Obvoius by budgenator · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sex in the dark is boring.

      Never thought I'd see sex and boring in the same sentence on slashdot.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    20. Re:Captain Obvoius by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      ah, but your truth is only truth for other nancy boys like yourself.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    21. Re:Captain Obvoius by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      Um, perhaps it's your palatable misanthropy?

      'cause really, that's all you creating that.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    22. Re:Captain Obvoius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because your'e not thinking about the *needle's* penetration.

    23. Re:Captain Obvoius by Nephandus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, those women are psychic thus fully justified in their misandry. Thanks for clearing that up.

      --
      "A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head."
    24. Re:Captain Obvoius by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Of course, when it's time to place blame, we can't possibly hold those women accountable for their behavior because it would violate the leftist men oppress/women are oppressed narrative, right?

      Quit white knighting.

    25. Re:Captain Obvoius by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      Hey there jumpy, any other conclusions you want to leap to?

      How many times do I have to say I'm not from the USA. I do not think in black and white and believe if you're not with us you're against us.

      Grow up and gain some logic and critical/thinking abilities.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    26. Re:Captain Obvoius by Jmc23 · · Score: 0
      People have these things called faces. They frequently give away our emotions.

      You are the proud owner of one of these faces. Why you even have this thing called a body that communicates with body language!

      Your misery and despair is clear in all your writing. Just get over it already, who cares what people think?

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    27. Re:Captain Obvoius by Nephandus · · Score: 2

      Misanthropy is a sport here. That's not what's sticking in your craw. Criticism of men get interesting, informative, even funny here. Replying negatively will even get you off-topic. It's criticism of women that always gets flamebait and usually troll, and, if the poster's male, the resident psychics always divine something wrong with him.

      No one in my life could ever read me. Besides, the women were openly the aggressors and clearly consciously gender-privileged, pulling all the misandrous tricks in the book in full public view. Were they afraid they'd not have done anything like what they did. They were physically threatening, even actually committing assault, yet playing victim the whole time. Not once in my life has anyone ever had a problem with their aggressions against me. Those that didn't awkwardly pretend it wasn't happening will back them in their unprovoked aggression, while implying my very presence justified it. You just proved no different. This isn't just prejudicial thought, but you're reducing even actions to nothing because I'm male. You wouldn't be making such excuses, if I were female. How dare you support such blatant sexism under then pretense of being the voice positivity.

      --
      "A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head."
    28. Re:Captain Obvoius by Jmc23 · · Score: 0
      Dude seriously? I don't care if you're a woman, man, or amphibian.

      As for nobody ever reading you? Seriously?

      Your nick, your sig and your resentment, paint a picture of your face, attitude, and disposition and it isn't pretty. One day you'll learn you can be happy and your face will change. Ugliness, meaness, etc... aren't in the bones, they're in the postural muscles of the face.

      Think about it, what the hell are you trying to accomplish with the anal manicuring of your face?

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    29. Re:Captain Obvoius by Nephandus · · Score: 1

      My face is usually blank. I'm called "serial-killer" for entering classrooms and sitting down. I genuinely grin, and it's called "rape face". You're not reading my face in text, Schizo-moron, nor would you be saying this shit to a woman to handwave assault, Sexist-filth.

      --
      "A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head."
    30. Re:Captain Obvoius by Jmc23 · · Score: 0
      You are seriously troubled. You are too blinded by your opinions to hear anything. And don't be idiotic again and pretend you've never heard of metaphors

      Go reread all those little black books you must have stockpiled. We write the stories of our lifes.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    31. Re:Captain Obvoius by Nephandus · · Score: 2

      You're blinded by your own prejudice. Seriously say, "A woman's face justifies her being assaulted, and she shouldn't care what a majority of bigots think or what out of their prejudice they even do to her." If you really think that about men, it shouldn't be a problem to post the same about women. Rather betting you wouldn't dare.

      --
      "A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head."
    32. Re:Captain Obvoius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the only place you'll see it.

    33. Re:Captain Obvoius by mpol · · Score: 1

      Beavis:
      "I have high standards in relationships. I have at least 3 requirements:
      - She must be a woman
      - She must at least have one breast
      - She may not be my mother"

      --

      Well, don't worry about that. We can get you back before you leave. (Dr. Who)
    34. Re:Captain Obvoius by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      No one in my life could ever read me.

      Nauseatingly arrogant? Check.
      Self-righteous persecution complex? Check.
      Projection of aggression onto others? Check.

      This is why no one likes you. You sound like a sixteen year-old who has been rejected by one girl and decided that everyone in the world is out to get him. Every sentence you write is dripping with fundamental attribution error borne of immaturity. Here's a clue: none of the people who you think are persecuting you care enough to bother. You are literally not important enough to them (no one is, really). Anything cruel they do to you is the product of indifference, not malice. That's all in your head.

      Worse, you've come into a public space and opened up with these embarrassing little rants that just make you look like, well, an incredibly immature sixteen year-old. This has nothing to do with being male. It has everything to do with the fact that you think and talk like a child.

    35. Re:Captain Obvoius by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      You can't see the magazine pictures in the dark.

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    36. Re:Captain Obvoius by bitt3n · · Score: 1

      Sex in the dark is boring.

      Land sakes, man, sex should never be boring! Leave the light on long enough to find the hole that's already there!

    37. Re:Captain Obvoius by Megol · · Score: 1

      Get some therapy, you obviously needs it. But how many people have called you "serial-killer" or said you have a "rape face"? Well, I'm assuming that you haven't killed a lot of people and isn't a rapist - that may be wrong.

    38. Re:Captain Obvoius by bitt3n · · Score: 1

      I think you grossly underestimate how low the standards of many men actually are. The requirements are pretty much just a pulse, and even that has some wiggle room.

      In all my years as a celebrated sex therapist, I've never heard that particular bit of female anatomy referred to as a 'wiggle room' before.

    39. Re:Captain Obvoius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Again... you didn't read the whole article.

    40. Re:Captain Obvoius by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      You've obviously never read my previous posts, I say stuff like everything is your fault to everybody.

      When I was younger I was picked on and beat up by friends, family, strange kids, strange/adults, random animals, etc.. since I was born.

      Do you think I spent all that time whining and feeling sorry for myself? No, I just decided to figure out why and change it. Predators aren't stupid, they pick on the weak. Just like the weak will band together against the predator.

      btw, as for women, it has very little to do/with their/face. Honestly, I don't feel any sympathy for anything that happens to/women after they put their sexual objects on display, wear skin tight clothing to leave no shape unimagined and then put on some heels to put them into permanent lordosis. If you basically/go out naked in a posture signalling you're ready to have sex and think it's just 'for you', well you're an idiot no matter how much you've been brainwashed by your society. Still doesn't excuse the wealth of stupid men who can't understand what is and isn't for them.

      It always takes two to tango... what are you bringing to the dance?

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    41. Re:Captain Obvoius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jeffrey Mogil’s students suspected there was something fishy going on with their experiments.

      Now which gender do you associate "fishy" with?

    42. Re:Captain Obvoius by Toad-san · · Score: 1

      I know! The title to this thread is sexist as hell!

    43. Re:Captain Obvoius by Nephandus · · Score: 1

      The complainer is not always wrong. The shrinks, ironically, agree with me, even the fake ass douche with the busty intern that does nothing. They're worthless when the problem is other people.

      Serial-killer was about half the classes I've been to in 4 years of CS, and that's not counting groups just hanging around campus talking about "him". I've been a "him" quite often. That I haven't committed violence doesn't stop anyone else from threats or actions. A woman attacking me would make me primary aggressor and give them all the excuse they need. This is reality, and you're siding with them in presuming this is a serious matter for males. You'll find out whenever a chick is in the mood to ruin your life.

      --
      "A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head."
    44. Re:Captain Obvoius by Nephandus · · Score: 1

      You've already made my point. You excused violence only one way. You're sexist. Hell, you used "nancy boy" seriously to shame a male. You lose.

      --
      "A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head."
    45. Re:Captain Obvoius by Nephandus · · Score: 1

      I'm not normalized scum like you nor care about your pretentious notion of maturity, so you drop your shaming tactics. Those never worked on me, which is what pisses filth like you off the most. Those attacking me sure as fuck attacked me, even physically. Those targeting me targeted me alone. That's not paranoia. I didn't even speak in the vicinity of most of them before they did either. It was specific and flagrant, even technically illegal, then handwaved and reversed by sexists like you. That was reality, which doesn't fit your preferred narrative's gender contradictions. You suck at gas-lighting.

      --
      "A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head."
    46. Re:Captain Obvoius by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      Does it hurt your neck twisting and turning trying to keep your feeble viewpoint alive?

      Never seen somebody so afraid to accept responsability for their life.

      Come out of the closet little boy, nobody is going to bite your head off.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    47. Re:Captain Obvoius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Just an idiot.

    48. Re:Captain Obvoius by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      You need professional help. I hope you get it.

    49. Re:Captain Obvoius by Nephandus · · Score: 1

      Yep, but cops and university staff don't like punishing female offenders, so raising awareness of the problem's the only option. The resistance that always results is awfully telling.

      --
      "A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head."
  5. 36% less pain by kruach+aum · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What does a percent of lessened pain feel like? I can't even tell whether my throat hurts half as bad as it did yesterday or a fourth as bad, and that's from a first person perspective, the only perspective from which you actually have access to pain sensations.

    I should also note that I'm not a mouse.

    1. Re:36% less pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... the only perspective from which you actually have access to conscious pain sensations.

      FTFY

    2. Re:36% less pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It means they shifted the mean of their response variable. It is not about what an individual but about the mean of the variable they are measuring.

    3. Re:36% less pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...as they clutch their chest and fall over dead...
      yeah, I guess that guy really was hurting. oh well.

    4. Re:36% less pain by kruach+aum · · Score: 1

      Sensations are always conscious. The concept of an unconscious sensation doesn't make sense, and would make anaesthesia torture rather than relief.

    5. Re:36% less pain by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      You're not quantifying your reactions to pain. If someone kept track of how often you said "Ouch, my throat" or grimmaced while swallowing, you could probably get an idea. It would be a proxy measure at best, maybe you were just used to it and it hurt the same amount. But one needs to quantify something in order to know if it's working.

      Animal studies are usually pretty messy even if you're not measuring behavior. Everyone who works with animals knows this. It's also more expensive. If you're testing a hypothesis and have the choice of testing it on some cells in a dish with an assay that turns from blue to white, or you could do an experiment on whether mice are in pain, only an insane researcher would choose the mice. So the only times people do things like try to tell if mice are in more or less pain are when there's no other option. And in those cases, one must make up a metric and do analysis that leads to odd things like "36% less pain."

      It would be more accurate to say there was a 36% less reaction to pain, though. Otherwise, it sounds like they're pretending they can directly measure pain.

    6. Re:36% less pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is why I am fighting the VA now as too many mental broke dicks thought I was faking when I got hurt and now have permanent spinal damage from a popped disc that has been sitting on a nerve for the past 2 years that actually causes problems to the toes and has the right foot go limp at times that the neurosurgeon says there is nothing they can do now.

      Ended up with an Uncharacterized discharge they are now having to change to medical from an injury in combatives class where I came down on one knee too hard. Too bad I am on next to no income for over a year while they tried to avoid checking and continue to do so till they finish.

      Have to love them lowest bidder Army doctors, care more about patient count than patient care which is why I found on my paperwork where my sick hall doctor would ask me questions and if he didn't like them he ignored them and made up his own for the paperwork, guessing to cover his own ass.

    7. Re:36% less pain by Demonantis · · Score: 4, Informative

      Pain scales in a lab setting are fairly common and rigorous. They mostly use a physical response that can correlated to pain using a complex apparatus. Of course, it is all extremely finicky which is why it took so long for this influencing factor to be detected.

    8. Re:36% less pain by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      We actually have very little data to confirm or dismiss whether humans feel pain while unconscious. Did you mean subconscious?

    9. Re:36% less pain by sexconker · · Score: 1

      We actually have very little data to confirm or dismiss whether humans feel pain while unconscious. Did you mean subconscious?

      Ask yourself this: Who is feeling things?
      Then define what constitutes that "who", how it physically manifests, etc.
      THEN you can begin to work out whether a given "who" feels something at a given time.

    10. Re:36% less pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe your link is only for patients and doesn't mention any 'complex apparatus'.

    11. Re:36% less pain by kruach+aum · · Score: 1

      We actually have a lot of data that confirms that humans don't feel pain while they are unconscious: the reaction you get from cutting them with a scalpel. If you cut someone who is conscious, their stress level increases, they pull away from the source of pain, they report the sensation of being in pain, and they react in various other manners. When you cut someone who is unconscious, their stress level does not increase (heart rate etc.), they don't pull away from the source of pain, they don't report pain sensations, etc., all of which confirms that unconscious people don't feel pain. The only thing that I can think of that is the same whether you are conscious or unconscious when you are being cut is the firing of nociceptors in the affected area, but just nerves sending signals taken by itself doesn't really tell you anything.

    12. Re:36% less pain by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

      Are you telling me you never felt real pain while dreaming? My first experience was when I was 4-5 years old, and I dreamed that I kept falling into a river of tomato soup. When I fell in, there was an intense stabbing pain in my gut. Eventually I woke up to having diarrhea. I had a stomach bug for a couple of days that I felt the symptoms of when I was unconscious. Another dream much later in life, someone stabbed me in my foot. Apparently, I had kicked the post on my bed (as per my wife) and had a nice bruise in the morning to show for it.

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    13. Re:36% less pain by kruach+aum · · Score: 1

      First, yes, I have never felt pain while dreaming. Second, I think when you're dreaming you're neither conscious nor unconscious, but exhibit aspects of both. Dreaming is different from being wide awake, but it's also different from being under anaesthesia. Meditative states and altered states of consciousness brought about by hallucinogens or psychosis are similarly difficult to place firmly in either category. Maybe it would help to see dreaming as "being in a certain mental state while you are asleep" that we know as something else if it occurs while we are awake.

    14. Re:36% less pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stress levels absolutely can increase when you cut somebody who is merely unconscious. Anesthesiologists uses multiple different drugs during surgery--one to make you unconscious so you don't remember the procedure, another to block the pain, etc. Pain is a multi-faceted and complex subject; it most certainly does not simply turn on consciousness.

    15. Re:36% less pain by ClownPenis · · Score: 1

      Where the $*#& did this comment thread get derailed? Where did my mod points go?

    16. Re:36% less pain by mikael · · Score: 1

      There are some people who had the muscle relaxant part of the anaesthetic, but not enough of the gas that makes them go unconscious. Then they very definitely could feel pain.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    17. Re:36% less pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Knew a chap like that in the army. Said he couldn't take it any more, jumped out of the plane without a parachute. Never saw him again. Funny sort of fellow."

    18. Re:36% less pain by kruach+aum · · Score: 3, Informative

      When someone is cut who is merely paralyzed, yes, stress levels can increase, and this is then taken by the anaesthesiologist as a sign of consciousness. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A...

    19. Re:36% less pain by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      I have a dog with _terrible_ gas. When she sleeps in the bedroom I sometimes dream I'm trapped in a sewage treatment plant.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    20. Re:36% less pain by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      Punchline: Heineken makes my pussy hurt.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    21. Re:36% less pain by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      The problem with pain scales is that sometimes they don't include all the numbers.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    22. Re:36% less pain by geekoid · · Score: 1

      we can measure the response' which has been done.
      i.e. does your brain react, does your breathing change, etc..
      And there is plenty of data.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    23. Re:36% less pain by geekoid · · Score: 1

      So people not under an anesthesia feel pain? Well done.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    24. Re:36% less pain by blue+trane · · Score: 1

      What gender were the emotion-scorers?

    25. Re:36% less pain by blue+trane · · Score: 1

      And, what gender were the measurers?

    26. Re:36% less pain by budgenator · · Score: 1

      How do you know if you felt pain or not if you don't remember when you regain consciousness?

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    27. Re:36% less pain by budgenator · · Score: 1

      All of you socialist leaning liberals take note, your average American sees socialized medicine as "Everybody stuck with an Army or VA Doctor". I'm actually surprised that the congress-criters that voted for Obamacare weren't tarred and feathered after they were thrown out of office.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    28. Re:36% less pain by budgenator · · Score: 2

      I usually say "if 10 is the worst pain I've ever felt, you better be getting out the narcotics at 4 because I've been on fire and peeled like a banana in hydro-therapy!"

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    29. Re:36% less pain by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      I'll agree with these others. I have absolutely never felt pain in a dream. I've never even thought about feeling pain in a dream. In general, my dreams aren't very tactile in the first place.

    30. Re:36% less pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How come you think the measurers entered the same room/environment as the subjects where in ? Especially when they where aware of what that could cause ?

      A well-placed simple glass wall would be sufficient*. Using a camera and monitor setup would do away with all kinds of contamination (even the "movement behind the glass wall" one).

      *preferrably with the observers room having an under-pressure.

    31. Re:36% less pain by Demonantis · · Score: 1

      Some of the pain scales have a procedure for lab animals like this one, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D.... I just linked to a list of pain scales since it was simpler. There are a bunch missing for the list too. I could have picked a better link arguably.

    32. Re:36% less pain by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      This is surely the funniest thing I will read all day.

      What I hate are the moments when I've gotten up, showered, pulled myself to work, started working for a couple of hours, and then there's this odd beeping noise coming from nowhere I can see. Then I realize the beeping is my alarm clock, and I wake up and realize all that preparation and work I did was wasted in a dream.

      Sometimes I have the inverse of this, where I'm awake and there's an unidentified beeping which sounds sort of like my alarm clock, and for a moment I wonder if I'm in a dream before I can establish that I'm definitely awake.

    33. Re:36% less pain by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      In general my dreams aren't very tactile, but I have both 1) had outside sensations leak into a dream, such as the pain from a cramp or stiff neck, and 2) had in-dream sensations including pain, which didn't correlate to any real-world thing and was entirely fabricated. They're rare, but the definitely can happen.

    34. Re:36% less pain by sjames · · Score: 1

      Inability to react is not the same as nothing to react to.

    35. Re:36% less pain by blue+trane · · Score: 1

      If gender can have heretofore unknown effects, why can't it have an effect on subjective measurements? You seem to be assuming gender has no effect on measuring the mice's grimaces, but isn't the point of the experiment that the gender of the experimenters had an unrealized effect?

      Note also that there may be some effect of being stared at in play. From http://ejp.wyrdwise.com/EJP%20...:

      "However in a post hoc analysis one of the
      conscious report variables approached significance for the
      interaction between staring and distraction in the predicted
      direction. The effect size of the staring effect in this condition was
      d = 0.57. We conclude that the starer’s mental strategy during the
      non-staring periods may be important."

    36. Re:36% less pain by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Very funny :) But:

      Switch the dog's diet to something free of soy and fish, low in fibre, and well-cooked (which with kibble requires that ingredients be very finely ground, to the point that you do not see any obvious particles), and the problem will go away.

      [I use about 5 tons of dog food per year. I have a clue here.]

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    37. Re:36% less pain by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      She's a 15 year old lab. Not going to mess with her diet at this age.

      I could rent her out as a garlic detector.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    38. Re:36% less pain by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Try to remember your code from the dream. It will be a good approach.

      I've worked with people who never have solutions come to them in dreams. They don't give a shit about their work and think I'm lying about literally dreaming up solutions.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    39. Re:36% less pain by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      I wish. Dream text constantly shifts on me. It'll say one thing, I look away and back, and it's something else, and I spend all my time trying to figure out what it's saying. I've dreamed up puns, songs, and fascinating stories, but never any code.

      Actual dream quote: "She can rescind her comments, but she can't re-cinder block."

    40. Re:36% less pain by Reziac · · Score: 1

      What exactly are you feeding her?

      I've got a pack of Labs myself. (Pro dog trainer.)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    41. Re:36% less pain by Knutsi · · Score: 1

      I feel people are pretty good at this. In a clinical setting, we ask people to rate their paint between 0 and 10, 10 being the worst pain imaginable. Another way is to use a visual analog scale.

      At least, people appear to be aware of degrees of pain, but only relatively. It does differ with personality and previous experience. So, it might be better to use for tracking perception of change in a condition than actual pain measured.

      If mice actually feel less pain or not sounds very hard to tell. It might just be that they ignore it more in light of other things, like the hunter who just entered the room (funny that, why would a male human give this effect, when I'm pretty sure most of the mice's natural predators are just as dangerous if they are female..).

    42. Re:36% less pain by kruach+aum · · Score: 1

      I always feel uncomfortable answering "on a scale of 1 to 10, how much does it hurt?" whenever I go to the doctor with complaints about pain. From what I've heard the most painful sensation possible is being shot in the kneecap, so that would be a 10, but having never been shot in the kneecap, how could I know how much that hurts? On the other end of the spectrum, what's a 1? Drinking carbonated soft drinks? Popping a zit? A bee-sting? In other words, how does the physician know what I take as my 1 and 10? If I can't do better than make a guess at the level of my own pain, how could the physician possibly get any useful information from that at all?

    43. Re:36% less pain by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Purina One Sensitive Systems: Salmon Formula.

      But it was just as bad on Lamb and Rice or the really overpriced stuff (Blue Buffalo).

      She is just particularly gifted. Terrible gas sense I rescued her, no matter what I feed her. She eats so fast she has to swallow a bunch of air. At 15 I'm happy to see a good appetite.

      Any human food with garlic, and she will almost take flight from the thrust.

      She doesn't have long. So long as she's happy I don't care if she smells a bit.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  6. shh.. you smell something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well that stinks!

  7. Social Implications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this suggest that female presence in a work place could reduce overall productivity and increase stress based on purely biological factors?

    1. Re:Social Implications by tylikcat · · Score: 1

      Well, no, it suggests that a male one might well. (The summary is incorrect.)

    2. Re:Social Implications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      making people too comfortable at work causes them to think it's a fucking party where they get to choose what to do and who to associate with..ie workplace feminazis.

  8. Depends on the male? by drainbramage · · Score: 2

    How do those little rodents feel when Richard Gere walks into the room?
    Remember what the brown gerbil said to the white gerbil?
    "You're new around here, aren't you."

    --
    No brain, no pain.
    1. Re:Depends on the male? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They would feel, like singing!

      Like picking flowers and quilting elegant blanket type things that just stupidly hang on walls.

      And they would suddenly be able to coordinate colors with scientific precision and have an uncanny knack for knowing just exactly what they should wear at the next vivisection.

  9. Re:Written by a Woman? by Zironic · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They controlled against no person present which had the same effect as female which means that it was the male odor that was the cause.

    They also tested with scents from various male and female animals and the male scents still had the same effect.

  10. So gender is a just a construct... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Now we just have to figure out how to stop imposing our gender norms on dog's pain receptors.

    1. Re:So gender is a just a construct... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed! Clearly these animals are all sexist pigs (ESPECIALLY the pigs!).

  11. Aha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I knew there was a reason I was always resistant to bathing.

  12. Why Male? by alta · · Score: 2

    Maybe the males are all neutral and the women are just nagging the animals to perform and causing too much stress!?

    --
    Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    1. Re:Why Male? by camperdave · · Score: 4, Funny

      I suspect that the animals *expect* to be tortured when males are around, so they steel themselves against it and thus feel pain less. However, when females are administering the pain, it is unexpected, and thus more intense.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    2. Re:Why Male? by alta · · Score: 4, Funny

      As a married man, I agree.

      --
      Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    3. Re:Why Male? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1

    4. Re:Why Male? by identity0 · · Score: 1

      But why male scientists?

  13. Re:Written by a Woman? by jcochran · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Did you bother to actually read the article?

    The results were quite simple. No odor, or just female odor = 1 result. Male odor = another result.

    Simple logic would then equate female odor = no effect (simply because the female odor had the same effect as no odor at all).
    So therefore, the male odor was causing a change in the results of the experiment.

  14. Showing pain, not feeling pain by gurps_npc · · Score: 0
    Animals know that if they show weakness in front of a predator, the predator attacks.

    Same thing happens in the school yard - "No I ain' t crying, I just got some dust in my eye".

    This is a psychological trick to avoid showing pain, not a biochemical trick to reduce pain.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:Showing pain, not feeling pain by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 5, Informative

      "Further testing showed that the rodents exposed to male odors were actually feeling less pain, rather than simply hiding the pain they were in. The male aroma ramped up their stress levels, which deadened the hurt. “It’s really astounding that such a robust effect could have been missed for so many years,” Mogil says."

      RTFA.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    2. Re:Showing pain, not feeling pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. What could biochemistry have to do with psychology. It's preposterous.

    3. Re:Showing pain, not feeling pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Further testing showed that the rodents exposed to male odors were actually feeling less pain, rather than simply hiding the pain they were in.

      The article then continues to support your reason for less pain response. That the potential presence of a lone male predator is a threat and it is not safe spending excess time responding to minor injuries.
      Also, the line right after the above quote indicates that the summary has it backward (as surprise to no one) about the part of test-rats getting stressed.

      The male aroma ramped up their stress levels, which deadened the hurt.

      This also indicates that lions figured out how to cheat the system.
      Male: "Every one of those tasty herbivores gets so flighty when I get close."
      Female: "Well, you're also scaring off the hyenas and other critters we don't want near the cubs. You stay here and act scary, I'll go get some dinner."

    4. Re:Showing pain, not feeling pain by gurps_npc · · Score: 0, Troll
      I read it. No results, just claims. Unsupported by facts. There is no such thing as a pain detection device. If such a thing existed, it would be used in lawsuits over soft tissue damage (i.e. whiplash or any other pain & suffering legal cases).

      Idiots measured a couple of hormone levels, declared them 'stress hormones', then declared that pain and stress were equivalent, then declared themselves the winner.

      Not real science, just journalistic claptrap designed to sell web clicks.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    5. Re:Showing pain, not feeling pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cut the GP a little slack - scientists missed it how many times over the years? GP only missed it however many times he read the article.

    6. Re:Showing pain, not feeling pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Further testing showed that the rodents exposed to male odors were actually feeling less pain, rather than simply hiding the pain they were in. The male aroma ramped up their stress levels, which deadened the hurt. “It’s really astounding that such a robust effect could have been missed for so many years,” Mogil says."

      RTFA.

      Clearly, it's natural selection via sexism. Science is mostly a male dominated field and, after a century or more of being used for experiments, these carefully managed strains of rodents now have genetically coded instincts that detect the scent of (male) human scientists as they do the scent of other predators.

      (Laugh, it's funny.)

    7. Re:Showing pain, not feeling pain by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      That's not directly contradicting what he said though: unless researchers are directly patch-clamping the pain nerves in the mouse feet while doing this and showing there are fewer pain signals from the same injury, one can't say for sure they're feeling less pain as opposed to simply hiding it. The stress might be working at the paw, or it might be working in the brain.

    8. Re:Showing pain, not feeling pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read it. No results, just claims. Unsupported by facts. There is no such thing as a pain detection device. If such a thing existed, it would be used in lawsuits over soft tissue damage (i.e. whiplash or any other pain & suffering legal cases).

      Idiots measured a couple of hormone levels, declared them 'stress hormones', then declared that pain and stress were equivalent, then declared themselves the winner.

      Not real science, just journalistic claptrap designed to sell web clicks.

      Perhaps you go read the journal article at Nature Methods.
      Lots of evidence, very significant results.
      This is REAL science and you don't have a clue what you are talking about.

    9. Re:Showing pain, not feeling pain by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Because there aren't female predators?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    10. Re:Showing pain, not feeling pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Often enough, females of a species are the predator.

    11. Re:Showing pain, not feeling pain by tylikcat · · Score: 1

      Actually, I am laughing.

      (Biomed, by the way, is one of the fields with great gender parity, but since previous generations - at least of mice - are in question, your point holds.)

    12. Re:Showing pain, not feeling pain by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      lioness hunt almost exclusively. Their are plenty of other examples besides that, but it was the first one to come to mind.

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    13. Re:Showing pain, not feeling pain by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      You didn't know my last boss.

    14. Re:Showing pain, not feeling pain by wagnerrp · · Score: 1

      Lionesses?

    15. Re:Showing pain, not feeling pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That discussion between a lion couple at the end needs to be an XKCD. :D

    16. Re:Showing pain, not feeling pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They definitely did a lot more than measure a few hormones. This Figure 2's legend (ignoring Figure 1, which was the grimace score):
      (a) Stress hormone levels in response to exposure of mice to male experimenters, male-worn T-shirts (M-Shirt; M-Shirt 30 min later (M-Shirt + 30')) or axillary chemosignals (at lowest effective dose from Fig. 1c), in the absence of any noxious stimulus. Bars represent mean ± s.e.m. (b) Fecal boli deposition after exposure of mice to male-worn T-shirts (mean ± s.e.m.) over a 30-min period. (c) Body temperature measurement (mean ± s.e.m.; n = 24 mice per condition) in mice handled by male versus female experimenters. (d) Decreased expression of the immediate-early gene Fos in spinal cord neurons after zymosan injection and exposure to male or female experimenters or shirts. Box-and-whisker plots show median, quartile and extreme Fos-positive neurons. A mean of 12 tissue sections were analyzed per mouse. (e) Mouse grimace scale (MGS) scores after blockade of opioid receptors using naloxone (NAL; 1 mg/kg), blockade of CB1 receptors using AM-251 (10 mg/kg), or their combination (both). Bars represent mean ± s.e.m. Vehicles saline and DMSO were combined (Veh.). *P 0.05, **P 0.01, ***P 0.001, compared to None/Vehicle/0 min/Veh. groups (by ANOVA followed by Dunnett's case-comparison test in a–c and e; by Kruskal-Wallis test in d). P 0.05, P 0.01, P 0.001 compared to an analogous male stimulus (in a–d) or empty room (in e) group. Group sample sizes are provided in each bar.

      Figure 3's:
      (a–c) Mean baseline latencies or thresholds ± s.e.m. to withdraw the tail from hot water (a), the hind paw from radiant heat (b) or the hind paw from von Frey filaments (c); mice of both sexes from multiple studies over a 10-year period were tested by male or female experimenters (n = 4–6 testers per experimenter sex; mouse sample sizes are shown in bars). (d) von Frey withdrawal thresholds in an experiment performed in a different laboratory. C57BL/6 mice (n = 20) were tested by six experimenters (n = 3 per sex), without or with a male- (M-Shirt) or female-worn (F-Shirt) T-shirt also in the room, in counterbalanced order. Bars represent mean ± s.e.m. (e) Thigmotaxis (wall-hugging) behavior in the open-field test. Bars represent mean ± s.e.m. time spent within 3 cm of a wall (out of 900 s total). In a–c, P 0.001 compared to other sex, by t-test. In d,e, *P 0.05, **P 0.01, ***P 0.001 compared to the no-shirt condition; P 0.01, P 0.001 compared to other sex, by ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test.

    17. Re: Showing pain, not feeling pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So perhaps if you expose the mice to the smell of those females the same thing happens, or these species (where the females hunt) game the system.

    18. Re:Showing pain, not feeling pain by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Sarcasm.. fail.
      I was being sarcastic to the original poster who said:
      "Animals know that if they show weakness in front of a predator"

      Looking at the data from these tests and the study, the poster is implying that predators are male.
      Which is false in many species. i.e. anything that eats mice.

      I keep rereading my post and really don't see how that could be read as anything but sarcastic in the context.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    19. Re:Showing pain, not feeling pain by tylikcat · · Score: 1

      So, that sounds impressive, but at most you patch clamps neurons, not nerves, and the relationship between activity nociceptive neurons and perceived pain is complex. Even were you able to record the activity of all nociceptive sensory neurons responding to the stimulus, you could not from that predict how the pain would be experienced in the brain, where the experiencing part is actually happening. (Heck, right now I'm working with sea slugs, that don't have brains, but instead just a number of ganglia, and even in that system of vastly fewer parts we can't make that kind of prediction.)

      The canonical use of the term patch clamp refers to pulled patches - where you remove a small piece of membrane from a neuron to examine the activity of one or a small number of ion channels in that patch. I suspect what you're thinking of is whole cell patch clamping* where you use similar electrodes to create a similar seal, but rather than pulling a patch away from the cell, you blow the patch and instead clamp the whole cell, measuring the change in voltage or current in the whole cell (the "clamp" bit refers to holding one steady while measuring the changes in the other).

      * Which, to be fair, is a ton of fun. And whole cell patch clampers - which is what I learned first - often use the term patch clamp without modifiers, just to confuse things.

    20. Re:Showing pain, not feeling pain by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      The more likely explanation (at least I think so anyway) is that exclusively male hormones with no female hormones present, coupled with the fact that nearly all mammals conserve these olfactory signals, means that the same olfactory signals in a "Strongly competitive" mouse colony (reproductively competitive that is) are being expressed by the preponderantly male research scientists, which increases stress hormone levels in the mice, which chemically inhibits pain receptivity.

      This makes sense, as a strongly competitive colonial environment is likely to cause injury to both male and female mice under the circumstances in question. Females get bullied for sex, males get attacked/killed to weed out competition.

      as the two types of hormones approach equilibrium, there is less competition for sexual partners, and the risks of physical injury by other mice decreases.

      Human males are just releasing the chemical cocktails that trigger the stress response in the mice.

      This just means another layer of experimental control is needed when using mice in experiments where pain tolerance or mitigation is being researched, and the human researchers are male. For example, spraying female olfactory hormones to counteract the effect, or ensuring that male to female ratios in research teams directly handling the animals is always 1:1, or favors female handlers.

    21. Re:Showing pain, not feeling pain by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      ..except that there are a lot of feminist politicians and 'scientists' running around who would actually agree.

  15. Actually MORE stressed. by WoOS · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The summary writes:
    The rodents are also less stressed out.

    The article writes:
    The male aroma ramped up their stress levels, which deadened the hurt.

    Was this the daily "Find the inconsistency" test on slashdot? Did I win something?

    1. Re:Actually MORE stressed. by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 5, Funny

      Congratulations! You win another year of editors who don't edit!

      --
      Not a sentence!
    2. Re:Actually MORE stressed. by petes_PoV · · Score: 2

      another year of editors who don't edit

      Well, that'll go nicely with another year of commentators who don't read the articles (and sometimes don't even get all the way through the headline).

      --
      politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    3. Re:Actually MORE stressed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention people who don't get all the way through the headline.

  16. Re:Written by a Woman? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this where "malodorous" came from?

  17. Statistical significance by sugarmotor · · Score: 1

    Can't find the article available for online reading, beyond http://www.nature.com/nmeth/jo...

    But one wonders about the sample size and the statistical significance of the experiments.

    --
    http://stephan.sugarmotor.org
    1. Re:Statistical significance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you had looked at the charts supplied you would have found them. 24 mice per condition tested, p-values are
      And anyway, you cannot reject something just by calling the sampling into question. Explain why you think that the study is flawed instead of karmawhoring by throwing out a few keywords you learned in stat 101.

  18. hiring policies - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this mean that it is ok to require that all lab assistants be female?

    1. Re:hiring policies - by denzacar · · Score: 2

      About as much as requiring that all veterinarians and their staff are male - cause we are basically walking painkiller for mammals.
      Which includes humans, so just on the off chance that it does work...

      But don't worry... From TFA:
      "Placing a womanâ(TM)s T-shirt next to a manâ(TM)s T-shirt negated the impact."

      Aaaand it just occurred to me that the negating effect of female smells is NOT the argument against "all male" animal or human clinics and hiring policies.
      Damn. Hope that does not become a trend.

      Is foregoing feeling 36% less pain really that big of price to pay to have sexy nurses and doctors?
      And by sexy I mean women.

      Not being sexist. Just being human male, hetero and honest.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    2. Re:hiring policies - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not being sexist. Just being human male, hetero and honest.

      the fact you feel the need to apologize for being male, hetero, and honest, is proof of the 'matriarchy' and the left wing pc rubbish that has infected objectivity and free thought in the west. Don't apologize for what you are.

  19. Well obviously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This means that men treat the mice better than the women and they can feel that.

    1. Re:Well obviously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > This means that men treat the mice better than the women and they can feel that.

      Yes, they train them to navigate a maze by putting a Sugar Daddy reward at the end.

      Next on the roster: train female mice to dig for gold.

  20. Re:Written by a Woman? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The most interesting thing in the experiment was that male odor + female odor cancelled out the male odor effect.

    Apparently (as stated in TFA), UNACCOMPANIED male odor caused the mice to not be willing to show pain, but a strange male in company with a strange female didn't cause the mice to go all macho all of a sudden.

    So, I wonder if male mice with female mice will show different effects than male mice alone?

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  21. Motives by JimSadler · · Score: 1

    I could easily believe that male hormones cause nearby animals to be more prepared to defend themselves and thus pain relief follows as an aid to flight or fight enhancements in the animal. This also demonstrates why variables should never exist in any scientific experiment and just how subtle a variable may be. The financial losses from decades of spoiled research could be considerable.

    1. Re:Motives by petes_PoV · · Score: 1
      It also makes you want to question other effects that would appear to trivial to even mention: like whether the room has fluorescent or incandescent lighting. Is there a lot of vibration from being near a road. What colour are the walls painted and the smell of the cleaning materials used by the janitors.

      And I thought it was only the social sciences who had so many variables that they simply ignored 99.99% of them: and couldn't even identify the rest.

      --
      politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    2. Re:Motives by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      This is the kind of argument so-called 'social scientists' make to ignore science that contradicts the 'proof' they want to present that backs their particular ideology/politics. Take it far enough and it's basically the creationist "well it's just a theory so therefore my beliefs are right" routine.

      While it's true that obtaining a perfect 'clean room' to study complex interactions is near impossible, external effects can be minimized to measure cause-effects accurately with high probabilities.

    3. Re:Motives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if it was a clean room then you couldn't extrapolate to real world results. Really every paper on animal behavior should purposefully vary the environment. Of course we still need independent verification on top. In this paper it looks like they did get data from another lab which is a new, good thing.

  22. Now it starts! Ob: H2G2 by FreshnFurter · · Score: 2

    "These creatures you call mice, you see, they are not quite as they appear. They are merely the protrusion into our dimension of vastly hyperintelligent pandimensional beings."

    Do YOU feel manipulated?

    Signed: A male (smelly) scientist

  23. Quantifying pain in mice by volvox_voxel · · Score: 5, Informative

    "The Rat Grimace Scale: A partially automated method for quantifying pain in the laboratory rat via facial expressions" http://www.molecularpain.com/c...

    Here is another paper where the researches used a patch clamp to interface the spinal cord. (A patch clamp is a very low noise/high gain amplifier that can measure single cell ion channels, etc -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P...)

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pu...

    I wonder what methods are typically used? Do researchers videorecord grimacing rats? That seems rather tedious and subjective.

    1. Re:Quantifying pain in mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it all makes sense now!

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwxIU6b80cI

  24. Only compromised if you're doing bad science by interkin3tic · · Score: 2

    This may be affecting experiments, but if you're designing your experiments correctly, it won't change your results. The "male in the room" effect should affect all animals the same.

    You have a control set and a variable set of mice. The animal handlers should be the same for both, and they shouldn't know if at all possible which is which. Males on the staff will stress out the mice, okay, but they'll stress out both control and variable mice the same. Having a female undergrad handle the control cages and a male undergrad handle the variable mice you're using to try to prove your drug makes them hurt less is going to skew your results independent of gender scents.

    1. Re:Only compromised if you're doing bad science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, if I try to reproduce your study, but your lab had a male animal handler and mine didn't, I may get different results.
      "Presence of male human" was not previously thought to be something that had to be controlled for.

    2. Re:Only compromised if you're doing bad science by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      I'm betting that this poster is a woman assuming that scent molecules can be controlled for by double-blind when it's going to be difficult controlling the dose.

      For instance; We've all known scientifically since the days of sailing that women are just bad luck.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    3. Re:Only compromised if you're doing bad science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if a lab technician falls ill, or drops out, or graduates and gets a real job, the only recourse is to abandon the experiment and start over?

    4. Re:Only compromised if you're doing bad science by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      The male handler will be handling both your control and variable, so you'll still see an effect though. You'll get different magnitude of results, but it shouldn't affect the reproducibility of it.

  25. Re:Written by a Woman? by tylikcat · · Score: 1

    There already is body of research about various hormonal reactions in mice that are sex specific. So, likely, yes.

  26. Laugh by koan · · Score: 2

    Is this why females are more irritating in general?

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  27. Wrong on stress, right on pain... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Either way, we make mice feel nice.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  28. Re:interesting how so many by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 4, Funny

    The labs have to stop using gay rats.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  29. Re:Written by a Woman? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bzzt. Oh, so sorry. The correct response was "Wow, I was a total dumbass for not reading the article. My idiotic knee-jerk rejection of this study based on the first stupid thought to cross my mind was completely wrong. I apologize for being a know-nothing smart-ass and promise not to do it again." Better luck next time!

  30. Quantum Uncertainty by DarthVain · · Score: 4, Funny

    Rats react to women the same as if their was no observer?
    Maybe we should she if women can observe things without changing states!

    This would explain a lot of male confusion when women say two diametrically opposed things in the same sentence... They can just observe more quantum states than we can and can't understand why we cannot. :)

    1. Re:Quantum Uncertainty by Solandri · · Score: 1

      It's even more wonderfully complex than that. TFA says that a T-shirt worn by a female placed next to the rats produced no change, while a T-shirt worn by a male reduced the levels of pain. But placing both T-shirts together cancelled out the effect of the male T-shirt. So the preservation of quantum state by a female observer also extends to a male observer if a female is present. I guess this explains why her POV always prevails in a relationship.

    2. Re:Quantum Uncertainty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      So the preservation of quantum state by a female observer also extends to a male observer if a female is present

      I got lost when you said the female removed her shirt.

    3. Re:Quantum Uncertainty by epyT-R · · Score: 2

      These days, her opinion prevails mainly because of the implied threat of her leaving and taking all his life's earning with her, hangs over his head. We have the ivy league left-wing indoctrinated feminist judges to thank for that (both male and female). For Great (Social) Justice.

  31. Two ways to look at it by Chewbacon · · Score: 1

    What's the baseline stress level? It would answer the question: do men cause 33% more stress or do women aleviate 33% stress? And I call bullshit on it anyway because I can tell you who stresses me out the most in order: my mom, my grandma, my sisters and my wife.

    --
    Chewbacon
    The Bible is like Wikipedia: written by a bunch of people and verifiable by questionable sources.
    1. Re:Two ways to look at it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      strike that, reverse it.

  32. Male odor could explain a lot by rbrander · · Score: 1

    ...like why women don't enter scientific fields...

    1. Re:Male odor could explain a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or men's locker rooms.

  33. Easy explaination by PPH · · Score: 2

    It's the drill instructor or coach attitude that they pick up.

    "Come on, mouse! Play through the pain! Gimme twenty more pushups!"

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Easy explaination by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1
      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    2. Re:Easy explaination by PPH · · Score: 1

      YouTube finally jumps the shark. I have to watch an advertisement before I can watch the cheese advertisement.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    3. Re:Easy explaination by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      I've still never seen an ad on YouTube. Maybe it's my off-the-charts geographic region, or maybe Adblock takes care of it.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    4. Re:Easy explaination by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      There are ads on youtube?

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
  34. pain in your dreams by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    I've never felt pain while dreaming. that sounds like a weird experience!

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  35. TIL... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...mice are sexist.

  36. Yes it will. Your 9 becomes a 6 with males there. by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Not in the cases where you measure LEVELS of sensitivity to pain in some way.
    Which basically includes every endurance or stress test.

    They are "zeroed out" to a higher level.

    Now your mice endure longer or don't start reacting as soon as they should have. So all your results are off by a third.
    On top of that, someone tries to repeat your experiment - and their mice react differently.
    There goes the peer review.

    And that's just the pain. What else is influenced by inducing more stress?

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  37. looool by slashmydots · · Score: 2

    "The rodents are also less stressed out"
    And so are the male scientists, depending on what time of the month it is.

  38. Oh there you go by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    "everything from the effectiveness of experimental drugs to the ability of monkeys to do math"
    Aha, so next time you're doing poorly on a math exam, tell the teacher that you need all the males to leave.

  39. Re:Written by a Woman? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This looks like junk science, all you had to read is "says M. Catherine Bushnell, a neuroscientist and the scientific director of the Division of Intramural Research at the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM"

    As in not real medicine and not real science, just junk masquerading as science. They developed their own pain scale based on anthropomorphism of mice "grimaces", then threw some smelly t-shirts in and watched the mouse face after smelling the body odor. nice.

    I'm concerned that our tax money may somehow be going to this place.

  40. Re:Written by a Woman? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    mice that are sex specific

    Who can tell in this crazy day and age.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  41. Re:Animal torturers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I take umbrage at that accusation, sir. I can sense the slightest of suffering from animals or humans alike. The fact that that suffering gives me great pleasure is beside the point.

  42. Rx: two pints Q.I.D., per os..... by rts008 · · Score: 1

    I think frequency would be slightly more important here...you would want to maintain a suitable blood-alcohal level constantly, but then you could always spike it higher for those pesky 'dealing with the public' occasions. ;-)

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  43. After reading the article... by cayce · · Score: 1

    I can only assume this was a clever experiment to make your lab assistants remove their shirts, for science.

  44. Re:Written by a Woman? by blue+trane · · Score: 1

    Govt isn't funded by taxes, in the same way that banks aren't funded by deposits. Banks' loans (created out of nothing) are their assets. So the Fed expands its balance sheet by creating an asset, which funds the government, and keeps the asset on its books forever. Zero-cost govt funding. Taxes aren't necessary, a relic of a feudal era.

  45. Got my stank on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I gots my stank on. C'mere and I'll let ya take a snootful of ma stank. Like that?

    Seriously, now I need to take a hot shower for a few hours. Scrub!

  46. Re:Written by a Woman? by tylikcat · · Score: 1

    While it's true that it's difficult to ask a mouse about its gender, sexing them isn't that hard.

  47. Bacteria Hate this One Weird Trick! by VortexCortex · · Score: 0

    After you cleanse with alcohol (or leave the shower) simply rub a half teaspoon or so of table salt into the dampened armpits to prevent the growth of body odor causing bacteria throughout the day. One may also use a salt solution to inhibit foot odor. There appears to be a link between Alzheimer's disease and the concentration of aluminum found in the brain which may have been absorbed via deodorants containing aluminum and/or food prepared in cookware containing aluminum. Thus, I also recommend against the use of aluminum foil -- Instead, use authentic vintage tinfoil for one's hattery.

    My studies indicate that males who eliminate odor in this fashion tend not to need worry over contamination of their surroundings by any female odor as well. The mechanism of repulsion has yet to be discerned, but preliminary research indicates it may be due to such preliminary research itself.

    1. Re:Bacteria Hate this One Weird Trick! by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      Technically the link was with antiperspirants and not deodorants and was debunked years ago.

      Jesus, using Snopes on Slashdot. What's the world coming to?

      http://www.snopes.com/medical/...

      http://www.webmd.com/skin-prob...

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    2. Re:Bacteria Hate this One Weird Trick! by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      While my original post was merely on the effectiveness of rubbing alcohol to eliminate body odor, I do use snopes and agree that its points are valid (for now).

      However, we already have a hundredish chemicals (including rocket fuel) in our bodies from polluted ground water and the skin is a semi permeable organ and it seems logical that if you rub aluminum salts on the surface and dampen it with sweat in your underarm that some aluminum salt is going to be carried into the body.

      If it's not all that effective, and it's not really well studied yet (studies are still underway as of 2013) then why take the risk?

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  48. Tests on men affected by the presence of a woman by FrodoOfTheShire · · Score: 2

    I know that when I have tests performed on me, the hotter the woman the more I'm affected. Now excuse me while I hunch forward while the hot nurse takes my blood.

  49. But ... but ... by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 0

    ... all gender differences are just social constructs! All the cool people say so!

    I'm sure if the mice had been give female monkeys and legos to play with when they were younger, then ... aw, forget it.

    1. Re:But ... but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Show that straw man who's boss.

  50. Re:interesting how so many by Tuidjy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Your comprehension of this article seems to be very different from mine.

    The smell of males seems to make other mammals feel endangered, and in this state, they feel less pain. This is similar to how people under great stress (for other reasons than being in the presence of He-man) will ignore the pain from even serious injuries.

    Now, if your goal is to make sure people around you are less bothered by pain, sure, share your smell with everyone. But if you would like to keep stress levels around you down, you should suppress your smell. It all depends on what your goal is.

    As for those who 'cannot handle that information', you'd be surprised how often people confused those who cannot handle something, with those who are actually thinking over what they just learned, and considering the implications. There are times where inaction is worse than the the worst action. In the modern world, such situations are few and far between.

    --
    No good deed goes unpunished...
  51. Re:interesting how so many by rubycodez · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    sounds like gay rat talk. your place or his?

  52. Re:Written by a Woman? by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    The real problem is that feminists and their supporting politicians have turned sex into a loaded subject, so when science associates it with some study, the water gets churned up to a point where no one can really tell who's telling the truth and who's pushing propaganda.

  53. Re:Animal torturers... by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    As opposed to then group of histrionic drama queens who now make up the bulk of the ruling class, who think that feelings (specifically theirs) should be center stage in everyone else's decision making process?

  54. Re:This is a Republican... by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    Actually the summary has it wrong. It's the male pheromone that inhibits pain but also increases stress.. If anything, this is 'feminist' science trying to find a reason to diss men...or perhaps it is correct science speaking the truth.

  55. Re:Written by a Woman? by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

    Perhaps if you head read the article you would have noticed that the female presence suppressed the stress response in the mice when the male was present. So I can only conclude you didn't. Anonymous cowards don't need to I suppose.
     

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  56. Terrible science communication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The original article says that the rats felt less pain because they were - more- stressed. Not less. The stress was too high for them to feel pain.

    Can you please correct this?

  57. So those would be the rats... by GPS+Pilot · · Score: 1

    So those would be the rats of NIH?
    ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R... )

    --
    That that is is that that that that is not is not.
  58. Re:interesting how so many by evilviper · · Score: 1

    Except human trials have found women feel more relaxed around sweaty, smelly men who don't wear deodorant (or just their dirty shirts). Pheremones are important.

    I imagine female mice don't have the same reaction to male pheremones.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  59. Douglas Adams was right by godztempus · · Score: 1

    The mice are experimenting on us! Someone get to Alpha Centauri quick and get the triplicate forms filled out to prevent the demolition of Earth!

  60. Men stress and relax mice? wtf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is a contradicting article.

    Do men stress mice out or not? Why is there polarizing conclusions from the same sources!?!?!?!?

    http://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/men-stress-out-mice-researchers-find-n91521

  61. To measure % pain in an animal ... your hurt it ?! by fygment · · Score: 1

    What's wrong with this: measuring "% pain" in an animal that cannot give meaningful feedback (mouse grimace? don't even want to think how they correlated that to pain as I'm sure they tried to) and the defacto assumption that all the experiment's subjects feel pain to the same degree (hint: humans don't all feel pain to the same degree and it is very hard to measure in us even though we can provide very clear feedback to people inflicting pain on us)

    Bah! Biology and related fields are not science any more than astrology is.

    There are no "first principles' in biology from which to theorize, it's practioners almost uniformly have a poor grasp of basic math and statistics, and their typically, poorly designed 'experiments', usually involve the discomfort, torture, mutilation, or murder of another creature.

    Make it so biologists and their ilk are only allowed to experiment on each other. That way the results will be more relevant to humans and the experiments will be fewer and much more carefully designed. Well maybe. Biologists seem to be a sadistic bunch.

    --
    "Consensus" in science is _always_ a political construct.
  62. Will we ever learn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.

    Mark Twain

  63. Re:This is a Republican... by dave420 · · Score: 1

    Or, far more likely, you are a misogynist.

  64. Re:interesting how so many by spmkk · · Score: 1

    Now, if your goal is to make sure people around you are less bothered by pain, sure, share your smell with everyone. But if you would like to keep stress levels around you down, you should suppress your smell.

    Uh, from the summary at the top of this very page: "Scientists have found that mice feel 36% less pain when a male researcher is in the room, versus a female researcher. The rodents are also less stressed out."

  65. Re: Captain Obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You sound nice and I bet you're pretty like a pony. Wanna play crabs sometime?

  66. Re:interesting how so many by Tuidjy · · Score: 1

    The guy who wrote the summary failed to read the fucking article, or lacked comprehension. Par for the course.

    --
    No good deed goes unpunished...
  67. Re:your loser tagline by CmdrTamale · · Score: 1

    below the line, you posted

    The United States of America are a country

    We lost that war in 1865.
    --
    I appear to be a voice of reason. I'll let you know what the other voices in my head say.

  68. Waitaminute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean to tell me the observer has an EFFECT? What? My God! This changes everything!

  69. this by rewindustry · · Score: 1

    proves my point.

  70. Re: interesting how so many by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for killing our jokes