This is how wingnuts view the world, but it's just not true that one has less when one is more successful. Successful people are simply expected to pull more weight because they benefit more from America. It's not at all complicated, but greedy people always want more to the point that they'll pretend to envy the poor.
Are you high? The Democrats may be described as Republicans-light because they're also right-wing, but not extremists. The Republicans may be Stormfront-light, but that's about all they're less extreme than. How could you possibly think a party that replaces the Republicans because they're off the deep end right-wing lunatics would be more right-wing?
We don't get to the point of galaxy hopping. Our machine descendants might, but the human race would be long dead by the time a ship crossed into another galaxy.
No it doesn't. That's an ignorant conservative belief, often repeated by people who have been propagandized by wingnut media. You guys just can't engage with the real world anymore because you have so many absurd, totally toxic beliefs fed to you by hate-radio, fake news, and the wingnut-o-sphere regarding America and Americans. Your complete lack of critical thinking skills has made you one of the dead-enders that has nothing to contribute to society. I hope you grow up one day.
>Nailed it. The land of the free has become the land of the free stuff.
No it hasn't, but the far-right-wing asshats that drove all the smart people out of the Republican party keep marginalizing themselves by making this claim. Keep it up idiots, your driving the Republican party off the deep end is going to make room for a new second party.
>Did it just become cool to call every unmanned aircraft a drone, after we started murdering people with them?
No, it did not.
>No one called toy helicopters drones 8 years ago. No one.
And we still don't. You seem to be unable to tell the difference between an RC helicopter that can only be used in line of site, from a drone, a remotely operated vehicle with onboard camera that does not need to be in line of sight.
You bigoted, clueless cave men have no place in the modern world. All you can do is thrash impotently on the Internet when the rest of have left you behind and denied you loons power over anyone from outside your cults.
>Sadly, you are right. And, given his dislike for America, he'll have two years to turn her into a 3rd-world country.
That's extremely stupid even for a Republican.
>Our only hope is that, being an incompetent nincompoop
Yes, wingnuts actually believe this. Your posts only serve to announce that you lacked the critical thinking skills to see through wingnut derp, and instead internalized every absurd belief that far-right media propagandized you with. It's pathetic.
It's because your posting history and bizarre sig indicate that you're a terrified wingnut. When someone's personality is the problem as much as their ignorance, just giving an answer isn't as helpful to their potential development into a rational person as mockery is. Something has to get you back on track.
>On a side note, can you imagine the United Nations agreeing to a planetary geoengineering plan? I can't.
Definitely, once the problem is obvious to even the derpiest right-wingers. When the people propagandized into driving civilization off a cliff feel the impact of climate change themselves, they'll actually acknowledge the problem, and may do something about it. It's just too abstract right now for less intelligent people to respond to it.
He can't. SpecialKendall has internalized a massive amount of wingnut propaganda. He doesn't even live in the same universe as reality-based people anymore. It's sad.
Of course holding it up already rolls the window up, but if the person asking the question wants to do something stupid and have the windows roll up with a single touch, that could be implemented without replacing the window regulator. You'd just have to hack together some electronics the latch the circuit in the roll-up position until the current being drawn spikes indicating that it's rolled all the way up.
>I don’t think the 60’s jetpack dream will ever be truly realized.
I'm surprised to find the concept dates back to the 20s, although I had never seen one until viewing media from the mid-60s. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jet_pack#Andreyev
Sounds like you quit PCs over 10 years ago. I need to upgrade every 4 years or so to keep up with the latest games, spending ~$500, and they look much better than console games. If you already have a fast PC, a good GPU is far more useful than a console.
>Shooters and every other type of game ever made needs a mouse.
No they don't, unless by "Shooters and every other type of game ever made" you just mean Peggle. You're locked into a tiny worldview, and completely fail to see that many other people do not share your narrow preferences. This is far from the first time that you've demonstrated your own limits in your posts.
Regular users get confused by these dumbed down interfaces too, because functionality is hidden and not easily discoverable. Hiding functionality helps no one.
>PC gamers hate joysticks. Mice, better performance, and mods are the only reason that PC gamers play PC games.
Why would you say something that's obviously not true except for a subset of PC gamers as if it's a fact? Not all PC gamers are at desks in bedrooms at their parent's house. Some of us PC game from our own couches with XBox 360 controllers. We do it for the much improved graphics and better performance than console games.
Slashdot Mirror
You wingnuts need to stick to your own hate sites. You just make an ass of yourself when you're not announcing your idiocy to like-minded dipshits.
This is how wingnuts view the world, but it's just not true that one has less when one is more successful. Successful people are simply expected to pull more weight because they benefit more from America. It's not at all complicated, but greedy people always want more to the point that they'll pretend to envy the poor.
Are you high? The Democrats may be described as Republicans-light because they're also right-wing, but not extremists. The Republicans may be Stormfront-light, but that's about all they're less extreme than. How could you possibly think a party that replaces the Republicans because they're off the deep end right-wing lunatics would be more right-wing?
>I've been trying to make a point of acknowledging when people make good points in response to things I say.
Even though I was a dick in my reply. You're alright.
We don't get to the point of galaxy hopping. Our machine descendants might, but the human race would be long dead by the time a ship crossed into another galaxy.
No it doesn't. That's an ignorant conservative belief, often repeated by people who have been propagandized by wingnut media. You guys just can't engage with the real world anymore because you have so many absurd, totally toxic beliefs fed to you by hate-radio, fake news, and the wingnut-o-sphere regarding America and Americans. Your complete lack of critical thinking skills has made you one of the dead-enders that has nothing to contribute to society. I hope you grow up one day.
Only deeply stupid people who've internalized wingnut propaganda call Obama a "socialist." I can see why you derped as an AC.
And another wingnut has spoken. It's a shame Fox shut down their comments and unleashed you idiots on the rest of the Internet.
>Nailed it. The land of the free has become the land of the free stuff.
No it hasn't, but the far-right-wing asshats that drove all the smart people out of the Republican party keep marginalizing themselves by making this claim. Keep it up idiots, your driving the Republican party off the deep end is going to make room for a new second party.
>Did it just become cool to call every unmanned aircraft a drone, after we started murdering people with them?
No, it did not.
>No one called toy helicopters drones 8 years ago. No one.
And we still don't. You seem to be unable to tell the difference between an RC helicopter that can only be used in line of site, from a drone, a remotely operated vehicle with onboard camera that does not need to be in line of sight.
You bigoted, clueless cave men have no place in the modern world. All you can do is thrash impotently on the Internet when the rest of have left you behind and denied you loons power over anyone from outside your cults.
Anyone who was actually as ignorant as the character you're trolling as would drown the first time it rained.
>Obama's actions are appaling and well on the way to destroying the country...
Do you ever wonder if your lack of critical thinking skills has led you to internalize Republican nonsense?
>Sadly, you are right. And, given his dislike for America, he'll have two years to turn her into a 3rd-world country.
That's extremely stupid even for a Republican.
>Our only hope is that, being an incompetent nincompoop
Yes, wingnuts actually believe this. Your posts only serve to announce that you lacked the critical thinking skills to see through wingnut derp, and instead internalized every absurd belief that far-right media propagandized you with. It's pathetic.
It's because your posting history and bizarre sig indicate that you're a terrified wingnut. When someone's personality is the problem as much as their ignorance, just giving an answer isn't as helpful to their potential development into a rational person as mockery is. Something has to get you back on track.
I can't tell whether you're joking, or totally delusional.
>On a side note, can you imagine the United Nations agreeing to a planetary geoengineering plan? I can't.
Definitely, once the problem is obvious to even the derpiest right-wingers. When the people propagandized into driving civilization off a cliff feel the impact of climate change themselves, they'll actually acknowledge the problem, and may do something about it. It's just too abstract right now for less intelligent people to respond to it.
He can't. SpecialKendall has internalized a massive amount of wingnut propaganda. He doesn't even live in the same universe as reality-based people anymore. It's sad.
Of course holding it up already rolls the window up, but if the person asking the question wants to do something stupid and have the windows roll up with a single touch, that could be implemented without replacing the window regulator. You'd just have to hack together some electronics the latch the circuit in the roll-up position until the current being drawn spikes indicating that it's rolled all the way up.
>I don’t think the 60’s jetpack dream will ever be truly realized.
I'm surprised to find the concept dates back to the 20s, although I had never seen one until viewing media from the mid-60s.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jet_pack#Andreyev
Sounds like you quit PCs over 10 years ago. I need to upgrade every 4 years or so to keep up with the latest games, spending ~$500, and they look much better than console games. If you already have a fast PC, a good GPU is far more useful than a console.
>Libertarianism is just Big Government renamed to Big Government Inc., with less accountability to the people.
This is why most of us grow out of our Libertarian phase by our mid-20s.
>Shooters and every other type of game ever made needs a mouse.
No they don't, unless by "Shooters and every other type of game ever made" you just mean Peggle. You're locked into a tiny worldview, and completely fail to see that many other people do not share your narrow preferences. This is far from the first time that you've demonstrated your own limits in your posts.
Regular users get confused by these dumbed down interfaces too, because functionality is hidden and not easily discoverable. Hiding functionality helps no one.
>PC gamers hate joysticks. Mice, better performance, and mods are the only reason that PC gamers play PC games.
Why would you say something that's obviously not true except for a subset of PC gamers as if it's a fact? Not all PC gamers are at desks in bedrooms at their parent's house. Some of us PC game from our own couches with XBox 360 controllers. We do it for the much improved graphics and better performance than console games.