Probably because Pandora is less expensive. Spotify is much better, which is why I switched, but someone with a very limited income might prefer to spend $5 less on Pandora.
It wouldn't be necessary to define something as obvious as SoC on a technical blog, but I suppose that's not what/. is anymore, so maybe you're right that they need to dumb it down more for the new audience.
>Your entertainment should serve you, not the other way around.
You're not talking about personal entertainment, you're talking about hanging out with your friends. It's never been possible to DVR friendship so you can hang out on your own schedule instead of everyone's. You're just not making sense.
You were entirely wrong, and have a wingnut sig, so I'm not surprised you failed to learn and kept arguing instead. Give it up. You live an alternate reality where you redefine everything to mean what you want it to mean, so you're never going to make any sense to the reality-based community.
>Zuckerberg/Facebook thinks we're going to have "conversations" with video snippets?
No, he expects Facebook users are going to have conversations with video snippets. This has nothing to do with the general population. He's judged his users well enough so far, so there's no reason to believe he's mistaken now. I expect that a lot of people are going to move into VR for their conversations, which means routing and likely storing massive amounts of video.
There's a big difference between having confidence in the scientific method, and having faith in some religious huckster. You're pretending that there's some kind of balance between the two sides, when ignorant rubes and educated people are not the same thing at all.
Because it's very difficult, if not impossible to demonstrate a source for free will if souls are imaginary. I think souls and free-will are both imaginary, based on how brain injuries change a person, but most people can't handle that concept.
Anyone who starts talking about what feminists other than themselves want, usually turns out to be a wingnut crank who filled their head with hate-radio and super-derpy right-wing blogs.
This would indicate to me that France is not off base here. If the game manufacturers are willing to harm their sales with a recommendation like that, there's likely a real issue.
You are correct, so stereoscopic 3D could potentially cause problems for a developing brain, but so can TV and video-devices in general. It's probably a good idea to wait until someone is at least 6 before feeding them any kind of media. Let them get started playing in the real world.
$50 is also a lot to get a sucker to buy it for. They must think it's more valuable for having marinated in a landfill, since this game was already available on eBay for a tenth of that price. I got my copy with a console and many other games for about $100. Not that I'd actually want to play this terrible game. The are fun 2600 games, but this is not one of them.
I have some small constrictors as pets, and can confirm that they can and will regurgitate if they can't get a too-large prey item all the way down. I'm still really against this insane show.
If your area is like mine, AT&T doesn't even count since it's a small fraction of the speed of cable Internet. Comcast is sadly my only option, and this is the case for many people.
It's really dishonest to pretend there's no difference between Democrats and the degenerate remains of the Republican party. Only one party got stuck in the dark ages and bases its policies on superstition.
Slashdot Mirror
I worked at the Sears tower many years ago, and we had machines that cleaned the outside of the building, so it definitely can be done.
Probably because Pandora is less expensive. Spotify is much better, which is why I switched, but someone with a very limited income might prefer to spend $5 less on Pandora.
> And when Obama is for everything that is shit
This is a wingnut belief, not reality.
>then it's good to be against everything he is for.
This is how the wingnut Republicans actually operate. They have the minds of spoiled children.
It wouldn't be necessary to define something as obvious as SoC on a technical blog, but I suppose that's not what /. is anymore, so maybe you're right that they need to dumb it down more for the new audience.
>Your entertainment should serve you, not the other way around.
You're not talking about personal entertainment, you're talking about hanging out with your friends. It's never been possible to DVR friendship so you can hang out on your own schedule instead of everyone's. You're just not making sense.
You were entirely wrong, and have a wingnut sig, so I'm not surprised you failed to learn and kept arguing instead. Give it up. You live an alternate reality where you redefine everything to mean what you want it to mean, so you're never going to make any sense to the reality-based community.
And movement, so mi is 3-times wrong. Plants may not get up and walk around like Triffids, but they do move toward light.
>Zuckerberg/Facebook thinks we're going to have "conversations" with video snippets?
No, he expects Facebook users are going to have conversations with video snippets. This has nothing to do with the general population. He's judged his users well enough so far, so there's no reason to believe he's mistaken now. I expect that a lot of people are going to move into VR for their conversations, which means routing and likely storing massive amounts of video.
There's a big difference between having confidence in the scientific method, and having faith in some religious huckster. You're pretending that there's some kind of balance between the two sides, when ignorant rubes and educated people are not the same thing at all.
Because it's very difficult, if not impossible to demonstrate a source for free will if souls are imaginary. I think souls and free-will are both imaginary, based on how brain injuries change a person, but most people can't handle that concept.
You're apparently a misogynist, but at least you're not as stupid as the losers who post your kind of derp under their own UserID.
Thanks for revealing what you are with your derp about "SJW's" It's clear that you're part of the problem.
Anyone who starts talking about what feminists other than themselves want, usually turns out to be a wingnut crank who filled their head with hate-radio and super-derpy right-wing blogs.
> you never know if the person on the other end is crazy
If anyone is sending death threats, even as a supposed "prank," I'm confident that they are indeed crazy.
This would indicate to me that France is not off base here. If the game manufacturers are willing to harm their sales with a recommendation like that, there's likely a real issue.
You are correct, so stereoscopic 3D could potentially cause problems for a developing brain, but so can TV and video-devices in general. It's probably a good idea to wait until someone is at least 6 before feeding them any kind of media. Let them get started playing in the real world.
That's nothing to be proud of, but you already know that or you wouldn't have posted as a coward.
Thanks Charlie. I still have the boxes and books for many of my 2600 games, but many are missing, and this will help.
$50 is also a lot to get a sucker to buy it for. They must think it's more valuable for having marinated in a landfill, since this game was already available on eBay for a tenth of that price. I got my copy with a console and many other games for about $100. Not that I'd actually want to play this terrible game. The are fun 2600 games, but this is not one of them.
Yes, you are correct, and everyone involved in this is an asshole.
I have some small constrictors as pets, and can confirm that they can and will regurgitate if they can't get a too-large prey item all the way down. I'm still really against this insane show.
CNN commentator labels iPad controversy 'false and idiotic', claims he was using both tablets
http://www.windowscentral.com/...
If your area is like mine, AT&T doesn't even count since it's a small fraction of the speed of cable Internet. Comcast is sadly my only option, and this is the case for many people.
>Nobody could have predicted HD streaming 5 years ago.
Are you joking? This was extremely obvious, and we all saw it coming.
It's really dishonest to pretend there's no difference between Democrats and the degenerate remains of the Republican party. Only one party got stuck in the dark ages and bases its policies on superstition.