Pepsi is an example of a company that makes nothing. Pepsi Licenses out the rights to use their logo, name and recipie for surgar water.
An example would be, every regional commercial is brought to you by (Insert Bottling company here). Pepsi provides the marketing and howto, other people pay for it.
I was looking for an answer, not a political scapegoat. I'm not silly enough to thing events like that are one person fault, or even one person, or one organizations responsiblity.
Why do you think it was President Herbert Walker Bush?
I remember they had something like this in my text book in 4th grade. They heated up a pool of graphite put barrels of waste in it, removed heat and you had graphite glass like stuff. That was 10 years ago, I can't believe this isn't wide spread now or deamed expensive and unusable.
HD-DVD and Blu-Ray do have a purpose - just because you don't see immediate personal gratification from the format is no cause to put it down
There IS immediate personal gratification on any product. I might actually buy some of these products. I'm just saying while these formats might be better, early adoption is a risk. If the format doesn't catch on, you have a very nice, very cool Video player with no videos.
Purchasing a movie studio and a large collection of movies is finally something Sony has done right, but that doesn't mean someone can't come out with a different. A technology that the market buys up and becomes standard.
I welcome the technology, I'll just not be the first to jump on the "Dude, this is great stuff, I need to be the first to have it" bandwagon.
Yes, but most people don't and won't have an HDTV for 10-15 years. I'm not saying the technology won't exsist, and I personally think it is cool and have similar movie theater plans. I'm just saying that the market will be expensive as people don't adopt. The jump to DVD is the easy part, and until people are either forced to upgrade or suddenly feel like repurchasing their entire collection AND a new player AND a new TV, the market won't respond.
As a disclaimer I have a couple of Laser disks laying around and I will probably buy such technology with in 5 years.
Don't feel like poofreading, sorry for grammar and spelling.
Seriously, people just bought DVD's. Heck, most of my collection is in DVD format. Which is as good as I need and probably as good as it gets for the next 20 years. From DVD there is no real compelling reason for the consumer to upgrade. It is already high digtial, the market already enjoys the Value Added features. Making a release in another format would be like Sony Max all over again.
I think you miss the point. The only useful amount of storage capacity we have for that much eletricity is the latency in the power grid. You're talking about increasing the potential energy of water using electricity. While a good idea, isn't quite the same thing.
My mother is a school librarian in NY and she has told me how Bush's current plan means that teachers teach tests instead of lessons, but I agree with this guy
Teaching a test isn't inherently horrible. It means you need a good test and no one teaching should know the questions on the test, just the area of knowledge and skill they are measuring.
I don't think the point your parent poster was trying to make was that a candidate needs the `right stuff'
Bush served the Air National Guard for the entire length of the commitment. The same cannot be said about Kerry. I don't think ANY military experience is required to be the Commander-in-cheif and I think most voters feel the same way. Unfortunatly, it has become a corner stone in this election because one of the canditates has made it a big deal. Devoting nearly 2 months of his campain to his Vietnam Service, I think Kerry opened himself up for investigation.
I wouldn't say Bush fails miserably. He also might not be the best man for the job, but he does have the abilility to lead. Which is something that the Commander-in-chief needs. Kerry has proven that he can be a senator (Which isn't necessarily a leader) and that he served in Vietnam and won some medals, which he later through over the fence of the white house in protest, or was it his medals? Were they some elses? Were they ribbons or medals he through over the fence? We all know he got them.
Let me try to make a point as I often ramble.
The Parent poster was just pointing out that Kerry is iffy on his explaination of his military service, and anyone who questions it is attacked, not by the merrits of their question, but an attack on the charactor of the questioner, and that is just silly. Someone who bring up the issue, makes it the cornerstone of their charactor and then doesn't answer any questions about it isn't fit for command.
I didn't poofread or spellchek
Re:We've been seeing a lot of this "safe" nukes st
on
Port-A-Nuke
·
· Score: 1
Well, coal has Thorium and Uranium. Uranium is usually between 1 and 2 ppm. I think the original post, aside from making the point that coal puts off MORE uranium that a power plan, was that if you spread it out it really doesn't matter. Uranium comes from the ground, it is the most common element by mass in the earth crust. What is wrong with pulverizing it and spreading it all over.....like where it came from?
The reason it doesn't take hold is that Argentina has no say in US fiscal policy. As long as there isn't One World Government, there's no global economy. It's just a bunch of squabbling mini-economies.
They would have little say over US fiscal and monetary policy. No problem there.
If it were truly a global economy, then every location would be the same as every other location. But I can't live in the US on an East Asian salary, now, can I?
This argument doesn't work as much as you'd like it to. A person can't live in New York on a Galesville, Wisconsin salary. (granted the quality of living is 10x better than your example) but it is a global economy. Everyone has something that someone else wants, in some countries its diamonds, others cheap labor, others bannanas. An example of somethings people don't really complain about is textiles. There are little to no clothing makers in the United States, almost all of the worlds clothes are made in Pakisan or India. People complain about sweat shops generically. I think a person is much happier (relativly) making 5 dollars a day running a machine or sewing at a borring job than farming and starving. Whatsmore these jobs left the US 30 years ago. There are NO Televisions made in the US either. Or wood pencils and erasers, or bannanas.
Politically, I have mixed feelings about dealing with China (The largest player). From an economic stand point, it is good for everyone in the world if goods and services can be made where it is most efficient or cost effect. But China is simply a country that is trying to have the money from capitalism while cold a firm red hand on communism, we'll just have to wait and see.
Even adding 10 - 20% ethanol to a lot of fuels would make this a feisable goal.
There is is one thing I've always thought, I live in Wisconsin, where sometimes winters can get to -30 in a good year.....what happens to the waste water from the fuel cell?
Slashdot Mirror
Like Aspyr?
It's fishing, it happens on every platform and requires the user to do something they think is in their best interest. Nothing new.
Pepsi is an example of a company that makes nothing. Pepsi Licenses out the rights to use their logo, name and recipie for surgar water.
An example would be, every regional commercial is brought to you by (Insert Bottling company here). Pepsi provides the marketing and howto, other people pay for it.
Hopefully that is coherint, kinda in a rush.
I was looking for an answer, not a political scapegoat. I'm not silly enough to thing events like that are one person fault, or even one person, or one organizations responsiblity.
Why do you think it was President Herbert Walker Bush?
Not really, you need 60% of both to have control.
Not saying thats good or bad, just the way it is.
Two Words to help with budget bloat.
Term Limits.
I have mod points, but I think I need to ask you a question.
Is the measure of a mistake in deaths?
If so, who's mistake was it that 3000 people died in a single attack in 2001?
If so, who's mistake was it that 40,000 thousand people died in auto related accidents last year?
If so, who's mistake was it that 6 people died in an attack on the World Trade Center in 1993?
Perhaps you just need to elaborate more. But in your current comments state, I can't believe you were modded Insightful.
Poofread? Why?
First time I've ever done this, but when someone makes a good point, it is worth to bring it out to people with moderator points.
Evil Doer!
I remember they had something like this in my text book in 4th grade. They heated up a pool of graphite put barrels of waste in it, removed heat and you had graphite glass like stuff. That was 10 years ago, I can't believe this isn't wide spread now or deamed expensive and unusable.
I didn't poofread
There IS immediate personal gratification on any product. I might actually buy some of these products. I'm just saying while these formats might be better, early adoption is a risk. If the format doesn't catch on, you have a very nice, very cool Video player with no videos.
Purchasing a movie studio and a large collection of movies is finally something Sony has done right, but that doesn't mean someone can't come out with a different. A technology that the market buys up and becomes standard.
I welcome the technology, I'll just not be the first to jump on the "Dude, this is great stuff, I need to be the first to have it" bandwagon.
Yup, no poofreading
Yes, but most people don't and won't have an HDTV for 10-15 years. I'm not saying the technology won't exsist, and I personally think it is cool and have similar movie theater plans. I'm just saying that the market will be expensive as people don't adopt. The jump to DVD is the easy part, and until people are either forced to upgrade or suddenly feel like repurchasing their entire collection AND a new player AND a new TV, the market won't respond.
As a disclaimer I have a couple of Laser disks laying around and I will probably buy such technology with in 5 years.
Don't feel like poofreading, sorry for grammar and spelling.
Seriously, people just bought DVD's. Heck, most of my collection is in DVD format. Which is as good as I need and probably as good as it gets for the next 20 years. From DVD there is no real compelling reason for the consumer to upgrade. It is already high digtial, the market already enjoys the Value Added features. Making a release in another format would be like Sony Max all over again.
I think you miss the point. The only useful amount of storage capacity we have for that much eletricity is the latency in the power grid. You're talking about increasing the potential energy of water using electricity. While a good idea, isn't quite the same thing.
As long as it is spelled right.
Teaching a test isn't inherently horrible. It means you need a good test and no one teaching should know the questions on the test, just the area of knowledge and skill they are measuring.
I don't think the point your parent poster was trying to make was that a candidate needs the `right stuff'
Bush served the Air National Guard for the entire length of the commitment. The same cannot be said about Kerry. I don't think ANY military experience is required to be the Commander-in-cheif and I think most voters feel the same way. Unfortunatly, it has become a corner stone in this election because one of the canditates has made it a big deal. Devoting nearly 2 months of his campain to his Vietnam Service, I think Kerry opened himself up for investigation.
I wouldn't say Bush fails miserably. He also might not be the best man for the job, but he does have the abilility to lead. Which is something that the Commander-in-chief needs. Kerry has proven that he can be a senator (Which isn't necessarily a leader) and that he served in Vietnam and won some medals, which he later through over the fence of the white house in protest, or was it his medals? Were they some elses? Were they ribbons or medals he through over the fence? We all know he got them.
Let me try to make a point as I often ramble.
The Parent poster was just pointing out that Kerry is iffy on his explaination of his military service, and anyone who questions it is attacked, not by the merrits of their question, but an attack on the charactor of the questioner, and that is just silly. Someone who bring up the issue, makes it the cornerstone of their charactor and then doesn't answer any questions about it isn't fit for command.
I didn't poofread or spellchek
Well, coal has Thorium and Uranium. Uranium is usually between 1 and 2 ppm. I think the original post, aside from making the point that coal puts off MORE uranium that a power plan, was that if you spread it out it really doesn't matter. Uranium comes from the ground, it is the most common element by mass in the earth crust. What is wrong with pulverizing it and spreading it all over.....like where it came from?
I don't get The Giver being banned either. It was REQUIRED reading when I was in middle school, and then again in High School.
Why would it be banned? Depicts socialism and controled death?
Written in English English, about a sport I knew nothing about....
:)
I didn't want to know that much about cricket
The reason it doesn't take hold is that Argentina has no say in US fiscal policy. As long as there isn't One World Government, there's no global economy. It's just a bunch of squabbling mini-economies.
They would have little say over US fiscal and monetary policy. No problem there.
If it were truly a global economy, then every location would be the same as every other location. But I can't live in the US on an East Asian salary, now, can I?
This argument doesn't work as much as you'd like it to. A person can't live in New York on a Galesville, Wisconsin salary. (granted the quality of living is 10x better than your example) but it is a global economy. Everyone has something that someone else wants, in some countries its diamonds, others cheap labor, others bannanas. An example of somethings people don't really complain about is textiles. There are little to no clothing makers in the United States, almost all of the worlds clothes are made in Pakisan or India. People complain about sweat shops generically. I think a person is much happier (relativly) making 5 dollars a day running a machine or sewing at a borring job than farming and starving. Whatsmore these jobs left the US 30 years ago. There are NO Televisions made in the US either. Or wood pencils and erasers, or bannanas.
Politically, I have mixed feelings about dealing with China (The largest player). From an economic stand point, it is good for everyone in the world if goods and services can be made where it is most efficient or cost effect. But China is simply a country that is trying to have the money from capitalism while cold a firm red hand on communism, we'll just have to wait and see.
Just my incoherrent .016632 Euros
Do you know what a googly is? I used to be a webmaster for googly.org and was asked if it had something to do with cricket.
>See Captain Kirk battle the Obsidian Order to save Beverly Crusher!
Yeah right, deep inside we all want Kirk to fail.
Agree'd
The network should should be insecure, and security should be handled by the application layer.
Think of wireless as putting a hub to your network outside, with a sign that says, "Come play with my network"
Even adding 10 - 20% ethanol to a lot of fuels would make this a feisable goal.
There is is one thing I've always thought, I live in Wisconsin, where sometimes winters can get to -30 in a good year.....what happens to the waste water from the fuel cell?
Forgot Odo... ..
And Romulan Senator Vrenack
And Wyauon
and