Well your priorities see a little strange to me. Consider the dead, the wounded and the traumatized, the economical and structural damage of each of these actions: Iraq and Afghanistan wars Economic Meltdown/Fraud Health Insurance problems The NSA snooping
The NSA snooping out of these strikes you as the most damaging to yourself, the USA and the world in general? Why?
I worked with Jason Lanier's VPL stuff in the 80's and even then the amount of people that got motion sickness was negligible. But we where "flying" over and through wire-models so the immersion was less than complete. And the "helmet" weighed 12 kilo's/ 30 pounds iirc.
I have all that stuff in my mothers basement, but she's been trying to explain that building it into a 1200 pound 100 mph machine and sharing the road with others while driven to distraction might be viewed as "anti-social" or even "sociopathic", and I'm like whatever mom. Maybe you could have a word with her?
There is no higher praise. It's like being called a traitor by Dick Cheney ; ).
On the other hand the amount of surprise at these revelations is surprising. Where is peoples sense of history? Remember the second world war (Axis and Allies anyone?) and extrapolate from that incorporating the events since.
I wonder if the 500 kg weight for the final model is inc. or ex. the payload and what the ratio is. Good luck and lets hope it's not "Per aspera ad astra". Long live the workers control over the means of production ; ).
The agency argues that SOP 303's disclosure could reasonably be expected to endanger the physical safety of individuals near unexploded bombs. Mot. at 13. DHS's thinking goes like this: 1) SOP 303 "describes a procedure for shutting down wireless networks to prevent bombings": 2) releasing information regarding this protocol would enable "bad actors" to blunt its usefulness": and 3) this "could reasonably be expected to endanger the physical safety of those near a bomb by increasing the chances that the process will fail and the bomb will explode".
Property versus Knowledge Property can be held, physically possessed. It is easy to see who possesses a piece of property. Knowledge cannot be physically possessed. It can only be known. When I take property from you, you no longer have it. It is easy to see that property is (or can be) exclusive, or what the legal beagles call "rivalrous", a zero-sum game. To the extent that one person uses it, they limit the amount that another person can use it. Knowledge cannot be taken away from you; when I learn some knowledge that you know, you still know it. Property has a clear origin; you start with raw materials, sometimes you you add labour. It is easy to see where property came from. It is easy to trace the movements of a piece of property. Knowledge doesn't have a clear origin; it is all derived from existing human culture and knowledge.
The Owl and the Pussycat went to sea In a beautiful pea-green boat, They took some honey, and plenty of money, Wrapped up in a five pound note. The Owl looked up to the stars above, And sang to a small guitar, "O lovely Pussy! O Pussy, my love, What a beautiful Pussy you are, you are, you are, What a beautiful Pussy you are." Pussy said to the Owl "You elegant fowl, How charmingly sweet you sing. O let us be married, too long we have tarried; But what shall we do for a ring?" They sailed away, for a year and a day, To the land where the Bong-tree grows, And there in a wood a Piggy-wig stood With a ring at the end of his nose, his nose, his nose, With a ring at the end of his nose. "Dear Pig, are you willing to sell for one shilling your ring?" Said the Piggy, "I will" So they took it away, and were married next day By the Turkey who lives on the hill. They dined on mince, and slices of quince, Which they ate with a runcible spoon. And hand in hand, on the edge of the sand. They danced by the light of the moon, the moon, the moon, They danced by the light of the moon.
Just a guess, he thinks the biggest guy in the room should be called "tank"? I personally think a point could be made for "rogue leader" or perhaps just "obese" ; ).
Slashdot Mirror
Slashdot IS the 1%: You need just $34,000 annual income to be in the global elite.
1942 / 1943 and Zero attacks, right in the nostalgia!
http://www.youtube.com/v/FbUN5ITWQQo
"I find the Law of Eight Billion to be more and more manifest the harder I look."
- Papa Smurf
I didn't know people still flew Zero's.
or is it Terry Gilliams "Brazil"?
(ignore the rules some more; question two).
Wouldn't you like to see a Studio Ghibli animation of the novel "Snowcrash".
Well your priorities see a little strange to me. Consider the dead, the wounded and the traumatized, the economical and structural damage of each of these actions:
Iraq and Afghanistan wars
Economic Meltdown/Fraud
Health Insurance problems
The NSA snooping
The NSA snooping out of these strikes you as the most damaging to yourself, the USA and the world in general?
Why?
I worked with Jason Lanier's VPL stuff in the 80's and even then the amount of people that got motion sickness was negligible. But we where "flying" over and through wire-models so the immersion was less than complete. And the "helmet" weighed 12 kilo's/ 30 pounds iirc.
"Burn the plane and boil the sea, you can't take my phone from me" fits better to the melody imo.
Any Siemens PLC's on board of the Mars Rovers?
An anonymous reader writes.
When man stare at goat man have heart attack.
I have all that stuff in my mothers basement, but she's been trying to explain that building it into a 1200 pound 100 mph machine and sharing the road with others while driven to distraction might be viewed as "anti-social" or even "sociopathic", and I'm like whatever mom. Maybe you could have a word with her?
But somewhere along the road, it must have been between 273 and 300 Kelvin, just right to keep water in liquid form.
There is no higher praise.
It's like being called a traitor by Dick Cheney ; ).
On the other hand the amount of surprise at these revelations is surprising. Where is peoples sense of history? Remember the second world war (Axis and Allies anyone?) and extrapolate from that incorporating the events since.
One of many such documented programs.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECHELON
But the (almost total) cooperation started in 1942 -1944.
I wonder if the 500 kg weight for the final model is inc. or ex. the payload and what the ratio is.
Good luck and lets hope it's not "Per aspera ad astra".
Long live the workers control over the means of production ; ).
Der Heutigen Stasi.
http://www.strandbeest.com/
"I just went to the bathroom".
@JFK
#YOLO #suicide-vest # Allahu Akbar
Against Intellectual Monopoly
https://mises.org/store/Product2.aspx?ProductId=552&AFID=14
You can't get a telephone-number for free? Buy a phone for $40,- and get a unique number. Not exactly free but close enough.
The agency argues that SOP 303's disclosure could reasonably be expected to endanger the physical safety of individuals near unexploded bombs. Mot. at 13. DHS's thinking goes like this: 1) SOP 303 "describes a procedure for shutting down wireless networks to prevent bombings": 2) releasing information regarding this protocol would enable "bad actors" to blunt its usefulness": and 3) this "could reasonably be expected to endanger the physical safety of those near a bomb by increasing the chances that the process will fail and the bomb will explode".
http://epic.org/foia/EPICvDHS-SOP303-Opinion.pdf
Property versus Knowledge
Property can be held, physically possessed.
It is easy to see who possesses a piece of property. Knowledge cannot be physically possessed. It can only be known.
When I take property from you, you no longer have it.
It is easy to see that property is (or can be) exclusive, or what the legal beagles call "rivalrous", a zero-sum game. To the extent that one person uses it, they limit the amount that another person can use it. Knowledge cannot be taken away from you; when I learn some knowledge that you know, you still know it.
Property has a clear origin; you start with raw materials, sometimes you you add labour.
It is easy to see where property came from. It is easy to trace the movements of a piece of property. Knowledge doesn't have a clear origin; it is all derived from existing human culture and knowledge.
http://darksleep.com/notablog/articles/Intellectual_Property_Is_Fraud
The Owl and the Pussycat went to sea
In a beautiful pea-green boat,
They took some honey, and plenty of money,
Wrapped up in a five pound note.
The Owl looked up to the stars above,
And sang to a small guitar,
"O lovely Pussy! O Pussy, my love,
What a beautiful Pussy you are, you are, you are,
What a beautiful Pussy you are."
Pussy said to the Owl "You elegant fowl,
How charmingly sweet you sing.
O let us be married, too long we have tarried;
But what shall we do for a ring?"
They sailed away, for a year and a day,
To the land where the Bong-tree grows,
And there in a wood a Piggy-wig stood
With a ring at the end of his nose, his nose, his nose,
With a ring at the end of his nose.
"Dear Pig, are you willing to sell for one shilling your ring?"
Said the Piggy, "I will"
So they took it away, and were married next day
By the Turkey who lives on the hill.
They dined on mince, and slices of quince,
Which they ate with a runcible spoon.
And hand in hand, on the edge of the sand.
They danced by the light of the moon, the moon, the moon,
They danced by the light of the moon.
Just a guess, he thinks the biggest guy in the room should be called "tank"? I personally think a point could be made for "rogue leader" or perhaps just "obese" ; ).