Slashdot Mirror


User: jonese_67

jonese_67's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
19
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 19

  1. Re:How are these made? on Sandia Builds Micromechanical 'Device Driver' · · Score: 1

    The photos from the linked article make great desktop wallpaper - good enough for me!

  2. Re:Not too impressive or that important, really on Alien Atmosphere Hubbled · · Score: 1

    That's just like a youngster to paraphrase a bit of pop culture rather than creating a retort on your own. Mr. Poopy Pants!

  3. Re:Not too impressive or that important, really on Alien Atmosphere Hubbled · · Score: 1

    He's drunk. What do you expect?

    Funklord, astronauts have walked on the moon in MY lifetime! Aren't you a little young to be drinking bourbon? How about a jello shot, son?

  4. Re:Tick and current events on Ask Tick Creator Ben Edlund · · Score: 1

    And I suppose you didn't think the Gilligan's Island episode where the Japanese submarine commander, who didn't get word that WWII was over, took Gilligan and mates captive was funny.

  5. Re:Why are we attacking the Taliban? on US Starts Attacking Afghanistan · · Score: 1

    If the US was defying international laws, the UN would be raising a stink.

    Why is it any better for the US to kill civilians than it is for bin Laden? The goal. Usama bin Laden wants Americans to die. The US wants to rid the world of organized terrorism. War is violent and innocent people die. While that is unfortunate, it's the nature of the beast.

    92% of the US population think that this war on terrorism, starting with going after bin Laden and the Taliban in Afghanistan, is justified. Apparently you don't, and I don't think I can change your mind, as you cannot change my mind.

    This is my last post on this thread.

  6. Re:IF YOU ARE MUSLIM, AND READING THIS... on US Starts Attacking Afghanistan · · Score: 1

    I know I'm wasting my time.

  7. Re:Why are we attacking the Taliban? on US Starts Attacking Afghanistan · · Score: 1

    Hey, the US brought forth what evidence we currently have to the UN, our western allies, and even some countries we're not really too friendly with (Pakistan). They unanimously agree that bin Laden is behind these and previous acts of terrorism against the United States.

    A terrorist group is not a government even if they call themselves that. Any type of diplomatic talks or legal hearings would be fruitless.

  8. Re:Why are we attacking the Taliban? on US Starts Attacking Afghanistan · · Score: 1

    I've wondered what our response would be if some terrorists belonging to the IRA had committed an act of terrorism on U.S. soil. However, this is a hypothetical situation since it hasn't happened.

    What did happened is that thousands of innocent American citizens have died, and the Taliban is harboring and supporting the man suspected of being the brains and money behind the perpetrators. Other governments other than ours (UK and Pakistan, to name two) have seen the evidence we have against bin Laden, and have found them to be sufficient enough to side with the United States in this matter.

    It seems to me that you expect the U.S. to deal with a government, run by people who condone and aid groups who use terrorism as a tool to further their political or religious (whatever you want to call it, doesn't matter) agendas, on equal terms. I personally believe the Taliban cannot be dealt with as a legitimate government, making whatever laws they have null and void.

  9. Re:Fuck you americans on US Starts Attacking Afghanistan · · Score: 1

    I notice this pointless argument is being done by two anonymous cowards. I guess there are both idiots in America and idiots who practice Islam.

  10. Re:IF YOU ARE MUSLIM, AND READING THIS... on US Starts Attacking Afghanistan · · Score: 1

    Um, Muslims belong to more than one country, idiot.

  11. Re:TO ALL THE PACIFISTS on US Starts Attacking Afghanistan · · Score: 1

    Why do you feel the need to add the adjective to Jesus' name? It's not really productive or relevant to this discussion.

  12. Where's my flying car? on British Researchers Say Fusion Is Close · · Score: 1

    I remember seeing an article in Popular Science magazine about fusion. It was right next to some facts about the city of the future, with flying cars and where everything was shaped like a Gropius accident or automobile fenders from the 50s.

  13. Re:If we're "God's Chosen People"... on More Links And Updates On Terrorist Attacks · · Score: 1

    We don't need Buddy Christ now! The angry, vengeful God of the Old Testament is more palatable at this time.

  14. Re:Like when Jethro Tull won a heavy metal grammy on Harry Potter Wins Hugo · · Score: 1

    What are you talking about? The flute IS a heavy me'al instrument! At least that's what the full-page ad in Rolling Stone said a month after Jethro Tull won the coveted award.

  15. Re:"Random Access" to pi on Are The Digits of Pi Random? · · Score: 1

    Is there a closed form to be had from that formula?

  16. Stone Age Water Cooler Scandal on Iceman Murdered by Arrow in the Back · · Score: 1

    Wow! Proof positive that early Man's population had its share of evil corporate ladder climbers. This guy was probably just trying to get ahead by working some overtime and getting some name-to-face recognition by his bosses, when Og Suckup comes along and stabs him in the back, claiming to have made the limestone wheel deal himself.

  17. Whoo hoo! No more useless Java pages! on MS XP Drops Java Support · · Score: 1

    Maybe the inconvenience of getting the latest JVM will push Joe Web Page Designer to refrain from using Java to make their pages do 'cool' (translated: useless) things. As a Java developer I'm happy to see a step toward dumping the browser-bundled JVM -- less work for me because I can code to one standard. It's already hard enough to keep up with the frequent Sun releases, let alone having to support multiple JVMs from various browser vendors. My dev team recently agreed to create only stand-alone apps and stay away from applets where we have to worry about compatability issues.

  18. Re:FNORD! on Review: Tomb Raider · · Score: 1

    The Illuminati myth has been around long before RA Wilson made it a popular one.

  19. Not All Shooters Are Bullied on Are Kids Turning Your Kids Into Killers? · · Score: 1

    (A little off-topic, but addresses Katz's premise.) What about the latest kid, Jason Hoffman of El Cajon, CA, to shoot up his school? His classmates described him as a regular kid who didn't get picked on at all. It's not always the bullied who go ballistic.