Slashdot Mirror


Sandia Builds Micromechanical 'Device Driver'

DanielRavenNest writes: "Sandia Labs has built a tiny bicycle chain type drive out of silicon. This allows one micromechanical motor to drive multiple devices scattered about a chip."

159 comments

  1. Completely useless for nano-motorbikes by ArcSecond · · Score: 0, Redundant
    Everybody knows that chain drives blow.

    What about a belt drive? Or a shaft drive if you really want some nano-torque?

    These guys are living in the past, man!

    --

    I've got a bad attitude and karma to burn. Go ahead. Mod me down.

    1. Re:Completely useless for nano-motorbikes by gorillasoft · · Score: 1

      What about a belt drive? Or a shaft drive if you really want some nano-torque?

      Well, they did take your statements into consideration:

      Vernon fabricated a microchain rather than a microbelt because although silicon belts are tough and flexible, they are spring-like and produce too much torque on gears not aligned in a straight line.

    2. Re:Completely useless for nano-motorbikes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      couldn't agree more... Almost 80% of the time the chain drive broke on Junkyard wars.

    3. Re:Completely useless for nano-motorbikes by Valgar · · Score: 1

      And I'll be damned if I need to crawl around with a can of 'Chain-Wax' to lube this thing...:)

    4. Re:Completely useless for nano-motorbikes by mini+me · · Score: 1

      Like the snowmobile episode?

      I was looking forward to that episode, being an avid snowmobiler myself. Unfortunately, it was quite clear that those designs were doomed from the start. The build part was still rather interesting though, and the front suspesion on the dirt bike was well done! Better than most snowmobiles had for many years. That was their problem though, they wasted their time on an uneeded feature such as suspension instead of focusing on the important things.

      And as for the parent of this thread. Snowmobiles use both belt and chain drives*. Beat that!

      * the belt is the transmission, so to speak, and the chain actually drives the track

    5. Re:Completely useless for nano-motorbikes by Dasein · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      It depends on what you're doing with it. If you want to go a few thousands of miles without chain goo slinging off onto your nice, clean Kilamanjaro Jacket then shaft drive is the way to go.

      However, shaft driven bikes (with the exception of some BMWs) exhibit "shaft-jacking" meaning that the back end of the bike will lift up an extra inch or so under heavy acceleration making the suspension less pliant and potentially upsetting a rider who pushing the bike hard.

      Belts, (IMHO) just don't cut it. There's a reason why you don't see them on world superbike machines. The only roadracing bikes to use them are Buells. But they're a segregated into a seperate class.

      Chains, however, seem to handle the 170HP of a Honda SP2 racebike (2001 SP1 Specs) just fine.

      Yes, I'm a geek -- even about cool stuff like motorcycles.

      --
      You are not a beautiful or unique snowflake -- but you could be if you got off your ass.
  2. How are these made? by PoiBoy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Other than that this stuff is made out of silicon, I don't know much about these devices. Are they etched like integrated circuits? And here's what baffles me...If they're etched, how in the heck can they actually make gears and stuff spin and move around?

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    1. Re:How are these made? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      Hmm.. honestly I dont know, but two ideas pop into mind:

      3D Printed

      or

      Etched.

      Man... I can't wait to see what happens when they start making microscopic machines. Anybody remember the plastic that has tiny capsules in it that break open when the plastic is broken, releasing a substance that restores some of the strenght? Wouldn't it be cool to use that type of plastic to act as a form of structural support while microscopic machines go in and fix the broken plastic on a real tiny level?

      Healing cars!!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:How are these made? by jdc180 · · Score: 1

      It's actually pretty simple, you simply use lithography to create the pattern you want to etch, then by alternating etching and growing SiO2 you can pretty much create anything you want out of silicon. The real trick is in reducing the resolution to a few microns across.

    3. Re:How are these made? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you break them away from the surface they're grown/etched on ?

    4. Re:How are these made? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      It is actualy quite easy, the gears that you see in the pictures are made out of poly silicon. So what you do it grow a thick (several micron) sacrificial oxide, pattern the oxide using standard lithography. Etch out the pattern of the gears, creating essentaly a mold of the gear. Then you backfill the area with poly silicon. You then preform a oxide etch with a HF acid solution and remove the oxide, leaving just the poly silicon gears. You grow the oxide, etch, fill, and repeat. This process is done several times to created diffrent levels. So as an example, the bottom of the chain would be layer 1. The Drive gear and the vertical post that connect the top and bottom of the chain are layer 2. Then the top of the chain is layer 3.

    5. Re:How are these made? by SirSlud · · Score: 4, Funny

      AC's are strictly forbidden from making informing posts. Don't you know that? ;)

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    6. Re:How are these made? by doooras · · Score: 0

      >>Man... I can't wait to see what happens when they start making microscopic machines.

      Micro Machines have been around for years... don't you remember the guy that talks way too damn fast?

    7. Re:How are these made? by Arjuna+Theban · · Score: 1

      One method we used in our lab was to use tiny gear support posts. Once you use the HF vapor to etch away the sacrificial SiO2 from underneath these prevent stiction (sticking + friction).

      ---

    8. Re:How are these made? by Arjuna+Theban · · Score: 3, Informative

      They can be actuated with a bunch of different methods. The easiest is a comb drive. I'll let you read up on it. As for how they are made: Most gear-like structures are built with "surface micromachining" ie: building up on silicon with SiO2, polysilicon, metal, various epoxies like SU-8 etc. There is, however, another way to build many structures too, it is bulk micromachining. In bulk micromachining, the device is built on a single crystal silicon, that is, by etching into the silicon and having the body of your machine be the silicon you started with (and of course the other various materials I said before). For all of you who wonder how bulk micromachining works, I suggest you check out Berkeley's "Single Crystal Reactive Etching and Metallization" (SCREAM) process.

      ---

    9. Re:How are these made? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      John Washita? (sp?) The guy who did the voice of Blur on the Transformers Movie?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    10. Re:How are these made? by nomadic · · Score: 1

      What a novel definition of the word "easy" you must have...

    11. Re:How are these made? by the_bikeman · · Score: 0

      If it is quite easy, then why is this considered important enough to make Slashdot? Seemed like this was a big deal!

    12. Re:How are these made? by Skirwan · · Score: 1
      It is actualy quite easy [...]

      [Insert incredibly complex stuff here]
      Oh, is that all? I though this was going to be difficult.

      :)

      --
      Damn the Emperor!
    13. Re:How are these made? by jonese_67 · · Score: 1

      The photos from the linked article make great desktop wallpaper - good enough for me!

      --
      - jonese (http://farmaccidentdigest.com)
    14. Re:How are these made? by nanojath · · Score: 1

      Sandia, creators of this technology, have more detaile information on their web page (which is surprisingly junky to look at, considering) but the parent to this comment is essentially right. Deposition, photolithography (applying, through printing a photosensitive mask then exposing it selectively to light through a filter, which allows selective chemical etching). They do some whach stuff with layers and combined processes though.

      --

      It Is the Nature of Information to Transgress Artificial Boundaries

  3. Moving parts bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Solid-state good.

    This looks like more solutions to non-problems.

    1. Re:Moving parts bad by FrostedChaos · · Score: 2, Insightful
      MEMS has many applications, not all of which are obvious. For example, you can make a pretty nice accelerometer that fits inside a small chip.



      Research isn't always about solving problems. But it's always about coming up with new ideas.

      --
      "Any connection between your reality and mine is purely coincidental." -Slashdot
  4. flap, flap, flap by BrianGa · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can I stick a baseball card on it, and hear the racket? All the neighborhood geeks will be so jealous...Hey, this Mickey Mantle isn't worth anything, is it?

    1. Re:flap, flap, flap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and where is this considered funny?

    2. Re:flap, flap, flap by MessiahXI · · Score: 1
      and where is this considered funny?

      well, it is only at 2... so far.

  5. Damn by jdc180 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Slashdotted in 4 minutes... those .gov servers blow ;)

    1. Re:Damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they got to be running apache...

  6. There are using for nano-motors by kaladorn · · Score: 2

    Not every task will be suited to a solid state solution. Some will require mechanistic activity or (another alternative to solid state) biological activity. In the case of things like nanites that are going to navigate throughout the body and do stuff, this kind of thing could be useful (or a springboard to something useful).

    But my first thought was "once they have the chain, then they can build the nano-cycle... but where will they find all those itsy-bitsy Clowns? And how many can dance on the head of a pin?"

    All right, I probably do need therapy :)

    --
    -- Mal: "Well they tell you: never hit a man with a closed fist. But it is, on occasion, hilarious."
    1. Re:There are using for nano-motors by ImaLamer · · Score: 2
      but where will they find all those itsy-bitsy Clowns?

      Silly, it's not for clowns... it's for the flea circus.

    2. Re:There are using for nano-motors by Polytechy · · Score: 1
      but where will they find all those itsy-bitsy Clowns?
      What about the itsy-bitsy spider?
  7. [mirror] Google's Mirror by BrianGa · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's Google's mirror, since it looks like this site was /.'ed.

  8. Before you get too excited... by Thagg · · Score: 4, Funny

    The application that Sandia has given, at least in the past, for their micromachine efforts is better locks for nuclear warheads. So, the analogy that the article makes to sewing machine factories only makes sense if they were nuclear sewing machines.

    thad

    --
    I love Mondays. On a Monday, anything is possible.
    1. Re:Before you get too excited... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>The application that Sandia has given, at least in the past, for their micromachine efforts is better locks for nuclear warheads. So, the analogy that the article makes to sewing machine factories only makes sense if they were nuclear sewing machines.

      You've done it!! You've unlocked the secret to cold fusion!! Just sew the lil' bastards together in micro nuclear sewing machines.

      It's really so simple, I can't believe that none had though of this sooner.

    2. Re:Before you get too excited... by barneyfoo · · Score: 1

      I used to work at SUN, and we had alot of contact with sandia and microchemical locks. What you say is true. The safety of our nuclear warheads is very high.

    3. Re:Before you get too excited... by ArnoldYabenson · · Score: 2, Funny

      Being made out of silicon, these devices are themselves prone to dangerous silicon explosions.

    4. Re:Before you get too excited... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      That's a killer app!

  9. Rejected again... by tramm · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    * 2002-01-15 15:51:31 Sandia Labs produces micro-machine chain links (articles,science) (rejected)

    Perhaps I should have selected "Technology" rather than "Science". Anyway, I found it at robots.net, another mod_virgule site. Get your robot news there first!

    --
    -- http://www.swcp.com/~hudson/
  10. Article on MEMS research by Stone+Rhino · · Score: 4, Informative

    here (free regblah.)
    AND for cut and pasters: http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/10/technology/circu its/10NEXT.html

    --


    Remember, there were no nuclear weapons before women were allowed to vote.
  11. finally by Gavitron_zero · · Score: 4, Funny

    this is great news for the little computer elves that do all the calculations in my computer. They've been slaving away on their abicii for years, now i can buy them bicycles with nano-chains and stuff!

    1. Re:finally by GigsVT · · Score: 2, Funny

      And they won't have to ride that bus back and forth all the time anymore.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  12. Cool stuff by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 2

    This is just cool. One can think of all kinds of applications for this. Even dumb ones. I do agree it could have uses in military technology as well.

    Could they use this to build motors in the top of chips and come up with some sort of package that allows the nano (and hopefully silent) fans to cool a CPU? Just a thought.

    --

    Gorkman

    1. Re:Cool stuff by Brendor · · Score: 1

      yes, one can imagine a far more sinister version of the teflon coated cop killer bullets. I suspect this technology will find military adoption all to soon once it's more readibly available..

    2. Re:Cool stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wondering but how could this kind of stuff be used to create a "better" bullet as you say?

    3. Re:Cool stuff by arkanes · · Score: 2

      Well a nano-sized fan is gonna move nano-sized amounts of air... I can't imagine that "fans" on this scale will do anything noticable. You could probably do something with liquid cooling of some sort, tho... keep a constant stream of mineral oil or something moving over the surface of the CPU and a heatsink.

  13. Reliability? by Rebel+Patriot · · Score: 2, Troll

    I'm not terribly well informed on how these things work on chips currently. How much smaller will chips really become if you were to put several shafts to such a chain? And just how reliable would would of these chains be when hooked to multiple shafts? A friend of mine told me once that the chains weren't currently put on multiple shafts because they wouldn't handle the stress, so is this smaller chain really going to make chips smaller?

    Disclaimer. I could be completely wrong on everything here. I am ignorant of circuitry.

    --
    Slackware forever. Honestly, what else would you trust when it absolutely positively has to be stable, secure, and easy
    1. Re:Reliability? by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2

      I don't know about chain-driven micromachines, but there's lots of instances where chains drive multiple shafts in macromachinery. Timing chains in engines for example, where the crank shaft drives perhaps two or three driven shafts through a chain.

      In the case of diesel engines with a mechanical injection pump, the torque load on the pump drive is very high and "pulsed" at the top of each compression stroke (tightest just before the injector opens). The chain will also be driving the camshaft (possibly two), maybe an oil pump drive, and occasionally you see the airbrake compressor driven off the chain.

      I should point out that the timing chains on big diesel engines like this are really horrible to tension correctly.

  14. Problem with microscale locks for nuclear warheads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    All you need to do is lithograph a 2-micron long hairpin, and that sucker's yours!!!

  15. History repeats itself... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

    "The 50-link silicon microchain is designed to transmit power somewhat like the drive belt in a 19th-century sewing factory. There, a central engine shaft powered by steam turned drive belts to power distant work stations -- for example, sewing machines -- before the dawn of the age of electricity."

    Great, now we can look forward to the nanobots getting maimed and mangled in miniature industrial accidents. Let's hope the bots don't "organize" too well and go on strike because of this.

    1. Re:History repeats itself... by analyst99 · · Score: 1

      Do they belong to any kind of union ? ;0) hope NOT!

      --
      I Came, I Saw, I Networked, I ate KFC :0)
    2. Re:History repeats itself... by homebru · · Score: 1
      Great, now we can look forward to the nanobots getting maimed and mangled in miniature industrial accidents.

      Not a problem. Just don't let your nanobots wear rolled-up cuffs on their blue jeans and they won't get caught in the drive chain.

  16. nothing exciting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this isnt very interesting at all
    ive been pretty apathetic in the past & this has just let me continue my apathy

  17. like what? by MediumWare · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Many people are talking about lots of uses for this thing, but nothing yet struck me as in: "yeah, if it can do this, it will really make a difference"... any examples?

    1. Re:like what? by chicolindo · · Score: 1
      Their may not be many uses for 'this little thing' but maybe they can implement the technology that they used to build 'this little thing' for other more important 'little thing[s]'.

      Who knows?

    2. Re:like what? by Drake42 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Microscopic device that you eat. It swims around in you like a submarine, communicates by tiny radio waves, can even take grainy, tech looking pictures to show doctors whats going on in side you.

      Tiny little bot with one of those chem detectors. Attach it to a tiny bit of iron. It floats around in a solution and when it finds a molecule of the type you're looking for it grabs ahold. Now you can seperate two things that were presumably not seperable before.

      Tiny machine that traces around circuits that have gone defective and actually repairs them through some magic. The little devices follow the paths until they come to a problem they can repair.

      My personal goal device actually has nothing to do with chains, but is a microscopic audio recorder that becomes permanently attached to your ear. It records everything you hear giving you perfect memory! Powered by body heat so you don't switch batteries, no bulky tapes, saves the data to disk at the end of the day. Suddenly my bad memory is no longer a handicap!

  18. Possible Use... by alfredw · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Consider hooking this thing up to a Brownian Ratchet, such as discribed by Feynman in his lectures. (For those not familiar with a Brownian Ratchet, this page give a good introduction and a cool Java thingy to play with. See also R.D. Astumian: Thermodynamics and Kinetics of a Brownian Motor, Science 276, p. 917-922 (1997). Essentially, it works like a very small, normal ratchet. Molecules in the atmosphere hit the system randomly. Sometimes it goes "forward," but it cannot go against the ratcheting mechanism - "backwards" is locked out. So you get a net forward motion on the ratchet essentially for free from the atmosphere.)

    Connect the Brownian Ratchet to this little chain thingy. Have it wind something up. User presses button, and thingy unwinds. Basically a free recharging system.

    Not all that practical, but pretty cool. I'm sure there are better applications... (anyone?)

    --
    In Soviet Russia, sig types you!
    1. Re:Possible Use... by wsherman · · Score: 2, Informative
      This particular chain is probably too big to see much brownian motion. Something like the ion channels that control the movement of ions across cell membranes might be more the right size.

      If one could design an ion channel that allowed ions to diffuse in one and only one direction one would have a battery that never needed charging. Of course, if that were possible evolution would probably have done it already. On the other hand, as I understand it, Boltzmann's H-Theorem only applies to dilute gasses so it remains to be proved that such a thing is impossible.

      Maybe the reason that humans are smarter than animals is that the neural ion channels in human brains have evolved to overcome the Second Law of Thermodynamics. It would be interesting to know if anyone has ever looked at whether ion channels obey the Second Law.

    2. Re:Possible Use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't there a guy named Maxwell who came up with an idea like that? I can't remember, I was jerking off in the back of high school science.

    3. Re:Possible Use... by Sgs-Cruz · · Score: 1
      The Brownian ratchets don't work... in the July 2001 issue they explained why it doesn't break the second law of thermodynamics :)


      There is exactly enough heat (random motion of molecules) that hits the central pivot that knocks it out of it ratchet and back a space that it cancels out the motion. Sorry, no free energy.

      -Cruz

      --

      Karma: pi (Mostly due to circular reasoning in posts).

    4. Re:Possible Use... by arkanes · · Score: 2

      I don't see how it'd be "free" energy in the technical sense, cause it's not. It's just "free" for all intents and purposes. Has one of these dohickeys actually been made and tested, and they KNOW that theres "exactly enough heat (random motion of molecules) that hits the central pivot", or is it just more conjecture?

    5. Re:Possible Use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In this sense, "free" means "able to be used to do work." The ratchet cannot be used for work if the mechanism is at the same temperature as the gas, because its thermal oscillations are necesarily as big as those of the rotor. If you had a very hot gas and a cool ratchet, you could conceivably make it turn, but you would eventually reach thermal equilibrium.

    6. Re:Possible Use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not likely. there's a reason the brain cranks through an ungodly amount of glucose; the pumps that maintain the ion gradients in nerves do require energy to do their job. all the ion channels are doing is taking advantage of that gradient.

    7. Re:Possible Use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's just "free" for all intents and purposes.


      Hahaha - That's for all intensive purposes, bonehead.

    8. Re:Possible Use... by PiwoJasne · · Score: 1

      um, no... it is for all intents and purposes

  19. Re:Reliability? (Mod: OT) by SirSlud · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    > Slackware forever. Honestly, what else would you trust when it absolutely positively has to be stable, secure, and easy

    Since when did secure go hand in hand with ease?

    We stick with FreeBSD .. ease is a matter of context, and security (akas: kernal/security mailing-list anality) is about as good as it gets. Can you point me towards a non-slackware-biased source that can break it down for me?

    --
    "Old man yells at systemd"
  20. Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'll be able to add a bike in a tightrope number to my flea circus.

  21. This seems like the ideal primer... by cliffy2000 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    For a neural network. I mean, such a mechanism seems to lend itself to a net. If it can indeed mimic these basic functions, they're sitting on a goldmine - maybe they'll even be able to reproduce simple biological functions... we'll see.

    1. Re:This seems like the ideal primer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe they'll even be able to reproduce simple biological functions...
      I know what biological functions I'd like to reproduce...
      Definately a goldmine for the sextoys industry ;)

  22. Now all we need... by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 1, Redundant
    ...is tiny little circus dogs to ride the bicycles and we're set.

    (Sorry. Couldn't resist).

    --

    "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

  23. Coming soon by SaturnTim · · Score: 3, Funny


    The Ultra-micro-featherweight class of robot wars! (Or battlebots, or robotica, or whatever)

    --T

    --
    http://www.theMediaBunker.com
  24. What we need is movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    OK, that's amazing to see, but who else here thinks what we need is a MOVIE of it running. That would be SOO COOL.

  25. Is anyone else reminded of the planiverse? by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2

    This looks a whole lot like devices from the Planiverse...makes sense, since they are essentially dealing multiple two-dimensional layers. If you haven't read "The Planiverse", I suggest you do so...fascinating book.

  26. Hair loss by inerte · · Score: 1

    Size of a human hair.

    Can it prevent me to going bald?

    Every tech should have a very practical use, you know...

  27. Oval gear? by Sludge · · Score: 2

    Is it just me, or should they work on rectifying the oval gear problem next?

    1. Re:Oval gear? by irecleas · · Score: 1

      The gear is actually a circle but the viewing angle makes it appear to be an oval.

    2. Re:Oval gear? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you should do it.

  28. Now, a teeeny tiny WD-40 can by simetra · · Score: 4, Funny

    will be necessary to keep it from gunking up.

    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
    1. Re:Now, a teeeny tiny WD-40 can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may also want to lube your ass with it.

      - The BOFH Troll

  29. Applications by Alien54 · · Score: 4, Funny
    I don't know. I have these visions of incredibly tiny bicycle messengers pedalling around the CPU delivery urgeant page fault messages.

    or going in circles shouting "Kernel Panic" or something.

    Just an image. Tron with bicyles ;-)

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  30. new toy of the future by British · · Score: 2

    Micro-Lego Mindstorms

  31. Cool! by Pinball+Wizard · · Score: 2, Informative
    Although this kind of stuff is not exactly new, it's still damn interesting.

    My mom is an engineer at SNL, and I try to go once a year when they have their open house for families. The place is packed with stuff just as cool as this - supercomputers, particle colliders, nanotech, rockets and sattelites, I could go on and on. Really an amazing place - reading about it doesn't compare to seeing it in person. I highly recommend visiting if you get the chance.

    --

    No, Thursday's out. How about never - is never good for you?

    1. Re:Cool! by uspsguy · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one who read this and briefly wondered why Saturday Night Live even employed engineers?

      --
      Profanity - The sign of a small mind trying to express itself.
    2. Re:Cool! by DTCDAN · · Score: 1

      No. =)

  32. Wonderful by fire-eyes · · Score: 1

    Damn. That is really neat. Good job sandia, keep it up.

    God this stuff sometimes feels, well... unreal heh.

    Neat.

    --
    -- Note: If you don't agree with me, don't bother replying. I won't read it.
  33. Oh damn, by Usquebaugh · · Score: 1

    since way back I've always wanted to work on the latest and greatest. So I took a Mech Engineering degree, then they said computers were the greatest so, I just finished my CS degree and they said the hot thing was Biotech, so four years later I have my 'Bio-Informatics' degree then they said Nanotech so four more years and it's now Mechanical engineering.. hey

    1. Re:Oh damn, by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 1

      "I took a Mech Engineering degree"

      Really? Do you do upgrades? I need more capacity for ER pulse lasers on my Atlas.

      graspee

    2. Re:Oh damn, by arkanes · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Well, Real Soon Now(tm), you'll be the most employable octegenarian on the block!

  34. Ceiling fans? by p3d0 · · Score: 2

    This reminds me of the last time I went to have dinner at the Old Spaghetti Factory in Toronto. Their lounge has about six old ceiling fans, all driven by the same motor, connected by chains.

    We all know what happened to that technology.

    This might prove to be a good stepping-stone, but I think the end result will be a motor on everything that moves.

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  35. New computer fans! by nizo · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now instead of one big honkin noisy fan, we can have the same noisy motor drive zillions of lil itty bitty fans (imagine if every little vent hole in your computer had a fan in it wheeeeee). Or maybe a huge wall full of these, would be safer to stick your finger into that then a big cut-your-finger-off fan.

    1. Re:New computer fans! by mtnharo · · Score: 1

      About the "better to stick your finger into" part. Better, until it shaves away your finger like a microscopic pencil sharpener, or you crush the whole thing instantly. Oh yeah, and since no one seems to have said it yet, *dun dun dunnnn* imagine a beo... aww never mind.

  36. Sewing machines? by ScoobyDoo-heh · · Score: 2, Funny

    Computer, knit me a jersey, bit two perl one :-) How do you oil the chain? If the chain breaks do you bend a valve?

  37. Re:Reliability? (Mod: OT) by FrostedChaos · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Since when did secure go hand in hand with ease?

    Ever since computers were run by human beings, who tend to make mistakes when technology becomes unecessarily complicated.


    FreeBSD does indeed have a good reputation for security, but not for the reasons you suggest. Also, the slackware user you responded to probably thinks slack is easier because he's been using it for so long, rather than because of any particularly well-made interface (slackware is very minimalist.)

    --
    "Any connection between your reality and mine is purely coincidental." -Slashdot
  38. Forget the chains... by AJWM · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just look at those gears. Man, with technology like that we can finally reduce Babbage's Analytical Engine to something that'll fit on a chip.

    Now that's a microcomputer!

    --
    -- Alastair
    1. Re:Forget the chains... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do they still have the plans to rebuild the engine?

    2. Re:Forget the chains... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be cute.

  39. Brownian Ratchet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does a Brownian Ratchet sound like a re-invention of Maxwell's Daemon? E.g. a cute thought experiment, but impossible to implement in the real world? Last time I checked, the laws of thermodynamics still implied there was no such thing as a free lunch...

  40. The second law stops you hot by MarkusQ · · Score: 3, Informative
    Consider hooking this thing up to a Brownian Ratchet, such as discribed by Feynman in his lectures

    The Brownian Ratchet you describe won't work, because of the second law of thermodynamics. The second law is potent enough that even evoking Feynman's name won't make it go away. Besides, what Feynman described was why this won't work.

    See Chapter 46 of the Lectures if you want the details, but in short, it would quickly get hot enough that its own shaking (heat=random motion remember?) would drown out the Brownian motion.

    -- MarkusQ

    1. Re:The second law stops you hot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sheesh. A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. I suppose you think windmills don't work, either.

    2. Re:The second law stops you hot by MarkusQ · · Score: 2
      Sheesh. A little knowledge is a dangerous thing.

      I agree.

      I suppose you think windmills don't work, either.

      They only work if the air has net motion relative to the windmill. You can't run one off of still air just because the air is hot.

      -- MarkusQ

    3. Re:The second law stops you hot by Canar · · Score: 1

      If the air molecules have a difference in temperature, theoretically you can.

      -=Canar=-

  41. not another big ball factory by crystalplague · · Score: 1

    this better not be like the chain on my big ball factory. *turn* *turn* *snap*....damn. maybe i should take the 10000rpm electric drill off and use the dinky motor it comes with.

  42. Current Application? by Tom+Davies · · Score: 1

    Does the Pentium 4 use these, or something else?

    Tom

    --
    I have discovered a wonderful .sig, but 120 characters is too small to contain it.
  43. HAVE YOU LOST ALL PERSPECTIVE??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL, had to say that... :-D

  44. Chainbreaker by obi-1-kenobi · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is going to use one tiny chainbreaker :P

    --
    "You win again Gravity!" -Futurama (Zapp)
  45. Re:Gears on the chips by obi-1-kenobi · · Score: 1

    Looks like you used to ride the bus to school

    --
    "You win again Gravity!" -Futurama (Zapp)
  46. Oh, that's not so tiny by roystgnr · · Score: 1

    I clicked on their "Download 300 dpi image" link, and it gave me a 533 pixel wide picture of the "microchain" drive. That means that gear must be over an inch and a half wide!

    1. Re:Oh, that's not so tiny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you're a retard. Do you really think those are actual size photos? Did you read the article? Moron. Look at the size IN MICRONS printed in the article right next to the image. Dork.

  47. Lame sewing machine analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not surprising that they make that analogy, the media contact guy is called Neal Singer...

  48. government sponsored geek mastrabionatronic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone remember that "lock" they built out of silicon 2 year ago that didn't get used in anything?

    I mean, come on... who supervises these guy?

    Sounds like the need to pratical guidance or some good old fashion exposure the commercial world.

    If they want to keep their funding, maybe they should think twice about announcing *anything*.

  49. Reliability is different for small things by Richard+Kirk · · Score: 2, Interesting
    A lot of the fatigue and wear problems we see on macroscopic devices are not problems with the bulk material, but problems with faults, inclusions, grain boundaries, and things like that. Every time you turn a real bike chain, the teeth will scrape off a few atoms, a dislocation may move by a small amount, a fatigue crack may get one atom deeper.

    These little gadgets are so small that it is possible to make them out of a single, faultless piece of material. Okay, if you had a dislocation or an inclusion in your bike chain, then it would fail pretty quickly, if it worked at all; but if you get a good one, then it will seem almost immortal when compared to macroscopic objects. So, you make a few spares, and throw away the duds.

    We are used to seeing silicon and silicon dioxide as crystalline. However, if you take out the small features that allow a crack to propagate through a crystal, then these materials can seem very tough and flexible. Think of glass fibres and glass. The Sandia site used to have a downloadable video of a minature moving mirror getting trodden on by a flea: it bends but does not crumple, and springs back unharmed.

    There are other changes as you get to submicron sizes. Surface tension and other chemical effects seem huge. Water drops seem to have a tough skin on them at this scale, and drops will sit on a surface rather than wet it. This is just as well: a water drop could glue the chain together if it could wet. As things are, these gadgets seem to survive in the open atmosphere just fine.

    If you think that is weird, the nanoscale stuff is much weirder. Interesting times, or what?

    1. Re:Reliability is different for small things by esonik · · Score: 1

      As things are, these gadgets seem to survive in the open atmosphere just fine.

      My question is: do they also work in vacuum ? I ask because mechanical parts in vacuum have always the problem that they stick to each other (esp. metals) because there is no lubricating water film on their surfaces.

  50. Microcomputer... by Fuzzums · · Score: 1

    Soon we will be building micro steamengines.
    That will take us risht into the micro industrial revolution which in turn will lead to the micro computer ;)

    --
    Privacy is terrorism.
  51. Micro Computing by MrCreosote · · Score: 1

    Does this mean we can now expect to see a Babbage Engine in the same form factor as a pocket calculator?

    --
    MrCreosote Meow!Thump!Meow!Thump!Meow!Thump! "You're right! There isn't enough room to swing a cat in here!"
  52. Already done by scorcherer · · Score: 1

    The original Pentium had a bug due to mismatched gear ratios, IIRC.

    --

    --
    The Cap is nigh. Time to get a fresh new account.

  53. Re:Bahaha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, don't waste Offtopic mod point. Mod the reply to parent up!

  54. Randomizer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't this enable us to make chips with a random number generator that's _truly_ random? No more fussing about with all that pseudorandomness :)

  55. Oil? by tif · · Score: 1

    Do these things wear out? I'm guessing that oil would not have the desired effect.
    --tif

  56. If you look real close... by SID*C64 · · Score: 1

    you can see the nano-hamster running in the wheel to turn this contraption.

  57. Nitpick, nitpick by VikingBerserker · · Score: 1

    Don't you guys really mean elliptical? I know, I know, it's not the way to make friends. Here's a thought, though: two elliptical gears can be meshed to act like a pair of round gears, as long as the major axis of each gear is perpendicular to the other's. The only downsides I can see (aside from being needlessly complex) is that there is probably added friction, and the gears would need extra space around them to avoid collisions with other objects. Might there be a use for such a thing on this small a scale?

  58. The Earth (atmosphere) is not a closed system by FreeUser · · Score: 2

    The Brownian Ratchet you describe won't work, because of the second law of thermodynamics.

    Not really. Energy is taken from the motion of the atmosphere. It is free in economic, not physical, terms, and is therefor not a violation of the 2nd law.

    In other words, it is not a closed system he is describing, but an open system where energy is introduced (from the molecular motion of the atmosphere, which in turn is powered by the sun).

    Furthermore, heating issues can be handled in the way they are handled in any electrical or mechanical system (in this case decoupling the ratchet, using active cooling, or whatever). Besides, chances are something like this is being used to charge a more mundane battery (converting mechanical energy to electical, which involves loss of energy, then converting the stored energy back to electricity, which involves another loss, and so on).

    All well within the laws of thermodynamics. Innovative, and "free" in the sense that atmospheric motion, powered by the cost-free energy of the sun, is free. Not at all free in terms of thermodynamics or entropy, as energy is being introduced from outside and then simply stored in some fashion, at a net loss in terms of total energy ... something we do with batteries all the time.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    1. Re:The Earth (atmosphere) is not a closed system by MarkusQ · · Score: 2
      In other words, it is not a closed system he is describing, but an open system where energy is introduced (from the molecular motion of the atmosphere, which in turn is powered by the sun).

      Furthermore, heating issues can be handled in the way they are handled in any electrical or mechanical system (in this case decoupling the ratchet, using active cooling, or whatever).

      And how to you propose to power this "active cooling" system? If it and your ratchet are both 100% efficient you can break even; otherwise, you'll be operating at a net loss.

      Before anyone else (the poster to whom I'm responding seems to understand this point) suggests passive cooling, that won't work either; your device is surrounded on all sides by the heat bath, otherwise you wouldn't be seeing the Brownian motion, remember?

      -- MarkusQ

    2. Re:The Earth (atmosphere) is not a closed system by FreeUser · · Score: 2

      And how to you propose to power this "active cooling" system? If it and your ratchet are both 100% efficient you can break even; otherwise, you'll be operating at a net loss.

      Of course, they won't be 100% effecient (2nd law), so it would be a net loss to use active cooling. However, if your system is overheating, then using some of that stored energy to actively cool the components down to an acceptable level may be a reasonable option. Decoupling the ratchet before it reaches such a state would IMHO probably be preferable, though (ie. stop introducing energy into an overheating system).

      Such a system can probably be made to work and yield useful results (energy storage and dispensation as required), but you are correct in saying you do not get something for nothing. What we would be doing is tapping into energy which is currently "wasted" (the motion of our atmosphere as it is heated by the sun and cooled by the planet's shadow) and storing it for later use. As with any storage system, there would be operating limits on how much energy can be stored, what its tolerances for waste heat, etc. would be, and so on.

      --
      The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    3. Re:The Earth (atmosphere) is not a closed system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Brownian motion "taken from the motion of the atmosphere" *is* thermal noise. A Brownian Ratchet won't work -- go read the Feynman Lectures chapter to see why.

      If you're talking about some non-thermal motion, then sure, it might work. But then it won't be a Brownian ratchet any more, will it? We've had self-winding watches and barometric clocks a lot longer than we've had microlithography.

      Bruce

  59. copy protection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is funded by the RIAA.
    When an unauthorized MP3 is detected, a
    mini chainsaw saws your chip in half.

  60. I say again, "the earth is not a closed system by FreeUser · · Score: 2

    ... it is powered by the sun. So fuck the damn creationists, doomsday get my gun" (to borrow a phrase from MC Hawking).

    There is nothing mystical about the physical infrastructure of human intelligence. We derive our energy from the food we eat (in a very ineffecient manner), much of which in turn (at some point) derives its energy from photosynthesis, which in turn derives its energy from the sun, an energy source external to the earth (and one which will, some day, run out).

    We are powered by the sun, in other words, not some mystical force violating Thermodynamic's second law. Our intelligence may have other implications, but a mystical violation of the basic laws of physics isn't one of them.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  61. If you look really, really close... by funwithBSD · · Score: 2, Funny

    You can see the Campagnolo Micro-Record markings.
    Each bearing hand polished by buxom Italian babes.

    --
    Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
  62. That whooshing sound by roystgnr · · Score: 1

    ... is what you hear when a joke goes completely over your head.

  63. Not just the sun by Mr.+McGibby · · Score: 1

    What about geothermal and nuclear? Geothermal is basically potential energy from the initial formation of the solar system and nuclear comes from the destruction of other stars and/or the raw energy of hydrogren.

    --
    Mad Software: Rantings on Developing So
  64. Does this mean paper tape will make a comeback? by rossy · · Score: 1

    I think there was a SCI FI book called the Difference engine, where "Clackers" used steam powered mechanical computers to run programs on punch cards. Now all we need is a really tiny keypunch machine. I can see it now... PKPA Personal Key Punch Assistant. Does this also mean CPU will mean Card Punch Unit?

    --
    Ross Youngblood
  65. Uh-oh by ar1550 · · Score: 1

    "Device drivers?" I hope their not for .VXD's or anything evil like that. With bicycles, those little MS drivers could escape my Windows partition three times as fast.

    --
    I once shot a man in Reno 'cause they cancelled Firefly.
  66. The nano-industrial age begins by jonerik · · Score: 1

    Coming next: Nano-smokestacks and nano-steel furnaces.