Slashdot Mirror


Iceman Murdered by Arrow in the Back

PenguinRadio writes: "The Washington Post has taken a break from the Chandra Levy case to report on a recently discovered murder of a 5,300 year old iceman. The iceman was discovered about ten years ago in the snow covered Alps near Italy, but it was unknown until today how he died. Scientists used a CT scan to discover an arrowhead embedded in his back. Being stabbed in the back is not a recent dot.com kind of thing." Somehow it's inspiring to see just how long we've been killing each other. This story is great in so many ways.

232 comments

  1. "This story is great in so many ways...." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You're a sick fuck, Mike.

  2. Re:Good thing he was Alpine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Ahhh, yes... The discovery of how this 5,300 year old corpse died is so very important.

    Perhaps I can buy you a clue. The point is, under the NAGPRA the remains would have to be handed over and reburied before any serious examination could be done. It is important to understand what people were eating at that time, what they were wearing, what technologies they had, what diseases they suffered. It's a whole lot easier to know where you are when you know how you got here.

    And, actually, it is important to discover how any person died, especially if it wasn't from natural causes. If it was from a disease, that would be important. If it was from violence, well that's pretty interesting too, don't you think? People claim violence today is caused by poverty, or overcrowding, or video games. But perhaps there are reasons that predate wealth, or population, or technology. No, we're not going to learn the answer to that question from this one corpse. But we're sure not going to answer it by reburying it without any study.

  3. Re:Good thing he was Alpine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yes, and it's doubly sad because it appears the populating of the Americas was far more complicated than was generally supposed. The old model of a recent migration across the Bering land bridge looks like it needs some revisions. The oldest human remains found in the Americas are in South America. None of the remains from >6000 years ago resemble any of the native American tribes, and in fact may be closer to polynesian. It's possible that there were multiple waves of immigration, starting well before the last ice age (the Monte Verde site in Chile might be 30,000 years old). People got to Australia by boat 40,000 years ago; it's possible that people got to America the same way. They could've sailed down the Pacific coast when the land bridge was still choked by ice. They could even have come west from Africa along the shores of Antarctica during an inter-glacial period when that coast was more hospitable than it is now. And that early wave disappeared, replaced by the later arrivals who were the ancestors of the current native Americans. Even some native traditions talk of "ghosts" who were in the land before them....

  4. Re:murder or accident? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4

    I happen to specialize in the European Bronze age. Though my main emphisis is much later. A hunting accident is not ridiculous at all. Imagin arrow knocked back, rugged terrain, and cold possibly icy conditions. A point in favour of this view would be the bones of the goat found nearby. The "iceman" could not have shot it with a dissabled arm. So a possible scenario would be the "attacker" leaving some food for the "iceman" and going to get help wich was prevented by a nasty storm. The bows of this period were short range affairs which required the hunter to get close to the game. Walking around with an arrow knocked back, would not be uncommon. This is not to imply that these weapons were primitive. They were not. In fact they were amazingly sophisticated, capable of tremendouse velocity. Also, even today, hunting accidents during archery sesson do happen, as I can personal attest. A buddy I was with, got shot in the ass by an over anxious bowman( term used loosely!) Fortunatly, the arrow had a target tip and had been slowed down by all the brush it went through. I highly recommond the study of the history of archery to anyone interested in technology. You will be astonished by the ingenuity of our ancestors.

  5. Iceman's conversation by abischof · · Score: 5

    Iceman's conversation with his hunting buddies:

    Iceman: You two really are cowboys.

    Hunting buddy: What's your problem, Kazanski?

    Iceman: You're everyone's problem. That's because everytime you go up in the air, you're unsafe. I don't like you because you're dangerous.

    Hunting buddy: That's right! Ice... man. I am dangerous.

    [Thunk! Arrow in the back.]

    Alex Bischoff

    --

    Alex Bischoff
    HTML/CSS coder for hire

    1. Re:Iceman's conversation by afflatus_com · · Score: 1

      That has to be the best comment I've seen in months. Superb. Thanks for the laugh, man.

      ---
      "And the beast shall be made legion. Its numbers shall be increased a thousand thousand fold."

      --

      -----
      Cast a Cold Eye
      On Life, on Death
      Horseman, pass by
      --W.B. Yeats' gravestone
    2. Re:Iceman's conversation by The+Troll+Catcher · · Score: 1

      Wow... I just saw Top Gun for the first time a few days ago... that's almost creepy in its coincidence.

  6. Re:murder or accident? by mce · · Score: 1
    Nope. This "problem of his" resulted from careless excavation efforts.

    --

  7. Re:OOG SPEECHLESS!!! by CrusadeR · · Score: 2

    Long time, no post... Welcome back Oog.

    --
    :wq
  8. No, the one we really need is... by Riktov · · Score: 1
    Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer!

    "Your modern world confuses and frightens me!..."

  9. Re:OOG SPEECHLESS!!! by shogun · · Score: 1

    Welcome back OOG, its been too long without your posts.

  10. Re:The real question is... by Eccles · · Score: 1

    did they find the killer?

    No, but OJ is looking for him...

    --
    Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  11. TV by Glytch · · Score: 2

    Hah. Let's see Columbo solve this.

  12. Re:Pick your battles by unitron · · Score: 2
    If you think that CNN has gone off the deep end, check out the "We must be fair and balanced, 'cause we say so every other minute" Fox News Channel on cable TV.

    They've even brought in psychics!

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  13. Gives a whole new meaning.... by unitron · · Score: 2

    Gives a whole new meaning to the phrase "Italian Ice".

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  14. Good thing he was Alpine by jimhill · · Score: 4

    Sadly, this kind of archaeology and anthropology in the United States is effectively dead -- whatever Native First Indigenous People American Indian tribe lived closest to the site of the discovery would lay claim to his remains and a wonderful find would be lost to science thanks to the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act . Fire up your Google buttons and look for the sad tale of Kennewick Man...

    --
    Learn to spell: nickel, missile, lose, solely, amendment, speech, kernel, probably, ridiculous, deity, hierarchy, versus
    1. Re:Good thing he was Alpine by Merk · · Score: 1

      I'm a big fan of useful science, but just because something can be done, and some potentially interesting (though not particularly useful) information may come from some investigation isn't necessarily enough of a reason to go digging up people's graves.

      Most slashdot readers are western-educated christian (at least culturally) scientific-minded people. We might not even mind if someone dug up our grandparents for the sake of science. But part of being a good citizen of the world is having respect for other people and their beliefs.

      Considering the way north-american natives were treated for the last 300 years or so, are they really asking for so much? Shouldn't they have some say in how the sites which they considered sacred and the remains of their ancestors are treated? I'm sure if they saw a real value in the science then they might make concessions, but "We wanna dig up a body to find out what killed him" is a pretty poor reason.

    2. Re:Good thing he was Alpine by nexthec · · Score: 1

      I'm sure know one will read this because it is on yeasterdays page but: your a fucking moron. the kenewick man was found while US corps of engineers were construting something(cant rember what). It gets carbon dated...tadah......it 3000 years old.....and unreleated to any current native groups found in North America. Shit hits the fan, local native groups claim it as their ancestor(couldnt possibly by the age, but under federal regulations, and body over 300 years old is a Native American, and is protected. suddeny this paints the "first nations" in an entierly new light....not the first nation, conqured by us, but a conquring nation, that commited genocide and wiped out an entire race of people. talk about innocence lost

    3. Re:Good thing he was Alpine by dinivin · · Score: 1


      Ahhh, yes... The discovery of how this 5,300 year old corpse died is so very important.

      Dinivin

    4. Re:Good thing he was Alpine by dinivin · · Score: 1


      So, if discovering this info is so important, why aren't we digging through cememeteries studying everyone that's died 300 years ago? Or 200 years ago? Or 100 years ago? Or yesterday?

      Dinivin

  15. The advantage of technology... by kcbrown · · Score: 1
    Somehow it's inspiring to see just how long we've been killing each other. This story is great in so many ways.

    Yeah, but it's so much more satisfying these days, when you can have the gore setting cranked all the way up and see your enemies exploding into blood vapor when you hit then with the BFG, and all from the comfort of your own home! None of that actually having to work at it like the old days. :-)


    --
    --
    Use 'slashdot stuff' in the subject line in any email you send me if you want to get past the spam filter.
  16. Re:In a related story... by Thag · · Score: 1

    No Comment.

    Thag

    --
    All opinions expressed herein are my own, and not those of my employers, who are appalled.
  17. Re:It Just Went Off by revnight · · Score: 2

    probably because people have many, many years to get sick and tired of their family, whereas the burglar just wanders in and out of your life rather quickly...

    --
    "The things we wizards have to put up with."--Jethro Bodine
  18. Re:I know who murdered him! by kzinti · · Score: 2

    Oh, sure, Blame It On Cain .

  19. Possibly a lover's spat? by banky · · Score: 2

    Here is a discussion of Otzi.

    Apparently there was a hoax based around the idea that arrows weren't the only thing coming from behind him.

    (read the story, you'll get the joke)

    http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a3_229.html

    --
    ZOMG I WOULD LOVE TO KNOW ABOUT YOUR FEELINGS ON MACINTOSH VERSUS WINDOWS, VI VERSUS EMACS, AND HOW YOU'RE NOT A DORK
  20. Top Gun? by cswiii · · Score: 3

    Was I the only one to think that, based on the headline "Ice Man" referred to Val Kilmer, killed in some freakish fashion?

    Urgh. Must grab my morning coffee.

  21. I'll bet OOG killed him. by Requiem · · Score: 1

    Own up, OOG. Iceman took your cave-weed and cave-hookers, so you decided to deal with him in a rather permanent way. Didn't you?

  22. The butler did it! by calags · · Score: 1

    The butler ALWAYS does it.

    --
    Never attribute to stupidity what can be construed as a monopoly preservation tactic.
  23. Message for you sire! by calags · · Score: 1

    I'm not quite dead. I think I'll pull through!

    --
    Never attribute to stupidity what can be construed as a monopoly preservation tactic.
  24. Re:Hunting accident? by calags · · Score: 1

    I guess he shouldn't have used the white toilet paper.

    --
    Never attribute to stupidity what can be construed as a monopoly preservation tactic.
  25. Re:It Just Went Off by wakebrdr · · Score: 1

    That statistic is BS.

    --
    Slashdot: Liberal News for Nerds. Liberal Stuff that Matters.
  26. Re:Possible break! by ethereal · · Score: 1

    If the bear skins don't fit, you must acquit!

    Remember: it's a "Microsoft virus", not an "email virus",

    --

    Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

  27. Re:Hit from below by ethereal · · Score: 1

    "Never go in against a Sicilian, when death is on the line!"

    OK, probably not.

    Remember: it's a "Microsoft virus", not an "email virus",

    --

    Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

  28. Someone's easily insipired... by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

    Somehow it's inspiring to see just how long we've been killing each other.

    Ever read/see 2001?

    Better yet, ever read Genesis? Yeah, I think Cain pretty well illustrates the fact that murder was one of the first big crimes...

    It's been going on a long time before mister Ice Guy.

    --
    ± 29 dB
  29. First murder... by PRickard · · Score: 1

    If you believe in the Christian or Jewish Bible and take it as truth, the first muder was well documented. A domestic crime, brother against brother, committed with a club. (see Genesis 4) The iceman is just one in a long line of people who were killed prematurely by other people, not the first and certainly not the last. And yes, it could have been an accident - people wearing animal skins tend to look like animals. This was before orange hunting vests y'know...

    --

    == Paul Rickard, Editor of The Microsoft Boycott Campaign ====

    1. Re:First murder... by operagost · · Score: 1

      It would explain why he was left with all his gear intact... the assailant probably realized his horrible mistake and fled the scene, perhaps after concealing the evidence.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    2. Re:First murder... by andkaha · · Score: 1
      [...] who were killed prematurely by other people, [...]

      Note to self: Never kill people prematurely, always wait until told to do so.

      --
      It's 11pm, do you know what your deamons are up to?
    3. Re:First murder... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1
      A domestic crime, brother against brother, committed with a club.

      I always thought it was committed with 'the leg of a table.' Who knew?

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  30. More bad Iceman-murder jokes.. by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 1



    In other news, Italian officials have assigned Otzi's murder investigation to their cold-case file.
    (Sorry, couldnt resist. Heheh)



    Bowie J. Poag
    Project Manager, System 26 GUI Component Stockpile

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

  31. Re:The Iceman's Last Words by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 1

    isTheLinuxCommunityWhatItUsedToBe() returned FALSE.


    Bowie J. Poag
    Project Manager, System 26 GUI Component Stockpile

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

  32. The Iceman's Last Words by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 2



    I wonder what the Iceman's last words were...

    Probably "Owwww!" ....



    Bowie J. Poag
    Project Manager, System 26 GUI Component Stockpile

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

    1. Re:The Iceman's Last Words by G-funk · · Score: 1

      I'd say more like "Owwww!... Ya f**kin pr**k!!"


      --Gfunk

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
  33. Probably running from stoneage cops by vik · · Score: 2
    I reckon he was running from the stoneage cops, and ran into a dark ravine...

    Vik :v)

    1. Re:Probably running from stoneage cops by MarkLR · · Score: 1

      If this was an American ice man maybe he was reaching for his wallet.

  34. Oetzi Pictures here! by MS · · Score: 2
    The official site for the Oetzi Museum ist here:

    http://www.iceman.it/

    Bye
    Markus
    --
    PS: I'could be one of Ötzis descendants... he was found a few km from my home... :-)

    PPS: 90% of all replys to this article are rated "funny" - I hope at least mine will be moderated as "informative" ;-)

  35. Re:OOG SPEECHLESS!!! by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

    > You know you're a nerd when... ...you originally read "GROK" as a verb instead of a name.

    LMAO.

    --

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  36. Re:Copper Axe really a weapon? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

    > that copper axe of his would make much more sense as a weapon

    The world's first known hacker!

    He was probably shot in the back for revealing that the neighboring village's cave paintings could easily be viewed without paying their fee.

    --

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  37. Re:Copper Axe really a weapon? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4

    > This is probably exactly what the guy's entire problem was. He was standing there, under attack, and thinking "Gee, I wish I had something that was suitable for use as a weapon, but all I have is this copper axe."

    IIRC, he was found with partially finished bow and arrows. Looks like "they" found him before he was ready for them.

    Ah! Check this out.

    Other pages disagree on whether or not he was a meat eater; some say that the (purported) fact that he wasn't a meat eater means that his bow and arrows were for fighting rather than for hunting.

    Also of interest, his bow apparently qualifies as a "longbow". See the entries for "iceman bow" and "longbo" at this site.

    --

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  38. Re:Copper Axe really a weapon? by turg · · Score: 2
    Copper is actually too soft a metal to be used as a weapon. If this is the cave man/ ice man that i recall, he also has a lot of tattoos over his body, the axe may have been used for ceremonial reasons.
    This is probably exactly what the guy's entire problem was. He was standing there, under attack, and thinking "Gee, I wish I had something that was suitable for use as a weapon, but all I have is this copper axe."
    :-)

    --
    <sig>Guvf vf abg n frperg zrffntr
  39. What I find Strange by Catmeat · · Score: 1
    Since it was found in 91, this guy's body has probably been subjected to more intensive study then any other set of ancient human remains, yet it takes 10 years for them to do a CT scan and make this discovery.

    I don't want to knock the people who did it. They deserve the credit. Yet wouldn't a flint arrowhead kind of stick out when using modern imaging technology? And wouldn't sticking the body through a CT scanner ot MRI machine be the first thing done by virtually any serious researcher who got access to it?

    There must be more to the story then then what's been reported. I just can't understand why it took 10 years to find this arrowhead.

  40. Possible break! by Levine · · Score: 3

    I think the question on everybody's mind is if Chandra Levy was kidnapped and murdered via stone arrowhead to the back, will this frozen iceman provide any forensic clues as to identify the assailant?

    Hopefully the Washington Post and other major news outlets will be quick to draw conclusions.

    Cheers,
    levine

  41. Iceman museum by jaa · · Score: 2

    online here

    --

    Never meant half of the things I said to you. So you know, there's a half that might be true - G. Phillips

  42. Re:murder or accident? by Merk · · Score: 2

    A jealous husband? You're making a lot of cultural assumptions there. Traditional inuit families often had wives with two husbands, or husbands with two wives. I even recall hearing once that it was custom for a man to lend his wife to a visiting guest.

    This man died 5000 years ago. People then were very primitive by our standards. It could be this man was killed because people thought he was posessed by an evil spirit. It could be that he was old and a drain on his community so he was chased out of his home.

    Good science requires that you don't forget all your assupmtions and look at only the facts. Don't jump to conclusions based on what might make you shoot a guy in the back.

  43. I Fell Down And I Can't Get Up by SEWilco · · Score: 3

    "Ow, I slipped and fell on my own arrow! Do I feel stupid! Well, at least nobody will know..."

  44. Oetzi by harmonica · · Score: 2

    If I remember correctly, Ötzi - who is very popular in the media here since he was discovered - was some kind of salesman who was crossing the alps to sell (or trade, whatever) flintstones.

    Maybe there was a flintstone mafia back in those days that didn't like what he did, so they sent a hitman...

  45. national enquirer already solved by garyrich · · Score: 1

    They say they have heard from a highly placed source that Gary Condit's worthless brother did it.

    --
    -- your Web browser is Ronald Reagan
  46. Murdered?! by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 2

    Dude, I was nowhere near there at the time, I got witnesses.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
  47. JPFO Issues Statement in Opposition To NRA by rm3friskerFTN · · Score: 1
    Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership (JPFO) issued a strong statement countering the NRA's misinformation.

    Rabbi R. Mermelstein commented ... The Iceman was obviously a proto-Nazi intent on killing all perceived "lesser races" rather than some sort of noble hunter fatally injured in a "hunting accident"

    Continued "misinformation" being spread by modern-day neo-nazi organizations has been picked up by normally straight-thinking, clear-headed organizations (e.g. NRA). As a consequence, this continued desire to disarm the "undesirables" (e.g. Jews, Homos, AMWAY believers, Republicans, etc) as prevalent today as it was during the Bronze Age continues.

    The young woman shouted "911" prior to the brutal rape. Had she waited the six-weeks it would have taken for the Regional Law Enforcement Organization to respond, she would have been killed vice the Iceman.

    It is sick that there are some out there who have necrophelic fantasies about some Ice WOMAN.

    Only by exercising her human right to self-defense was this member of a "lesser race" able to survive her brutal rape, kill her assailant (i.e. the Iceman) rather than be killed, and struggle across the Alps to freedom.

    --

    I believe Juanita

  48. Copyright by macdaddy · · Score: 1
    I guess he must have violated some copyright law. I wonder what the caveman version of the DMCA was...

    --

  49. Re:What Men do for a pretty face! by Steve+B · · Score: 1

    This turns out to be a mutation of an April Fool's Day joke, as revealed in the font of knowledge.
    /.

    --
    /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
  50. Poor brave Otzi by Hard_Code · · Score: 1

    ...who bravely, bravely, bravely, ran away...

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  51. Re:OOG SPEECHLESS!!! by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

    I swear, Sesame Street needs to hire Oog poste haste!

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  52. Re:We need Perry Mason! by devphil · · Score: 2

    You should insert linebreaks (with
    ) in your sig, to break it up the same way Theoden said it. Okay, that made no sense -- well, the same way Tolkien wrote it when he translated Theoden saying it. :-)

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
  53. We need Perry Mason! by devphil · · Score: 5
    The angle of the wound suggests Otzi's assailant fired from below. The arrowhead, less than an inch long, ripped through his back, tore through the nerves of his left arm and sliced the veins, lodging itself between the shoulder blade and rib cage. He likely survived the initial assault, because the arrow did not strike any vital organs. But he probably lost feeling in his left arm from nerve damage, and he would have suffered massive hemorrhaging. The arrowhead stopped just short of his lungs.

    Wow. They couldn't get anywhere near that detailed in the OJ Simpson case, but they can list point-for-point the assault on a dude frozen for 53 centuries. :-)

    And ten years from now, new evidence will come to light. And some Italian-Austrian-Alps-area con man will claim to be Otzi's descendant, and sue for mistrial.

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
    1. Re:We need Perry Mason! by Gyver · · Score: 1

      Speaking as an American who is disgruntled with the system...

      Well said!

    2. Re:We need Perry Mason! by Gyver · · Score: 1

      It especially didn't make any sence,because Theoden didn't say it. His nephew Eomer did.

      Actually, I tried to break it up but it wouldn't fit in the alloted space. I had to cut some out of it too.

      It should read:

      Out of doubt, out of dark, to the days end I came singing in the sun sword unsheathing.
      To hopes end I rode and to hearts breaking.
      Now for wrath, now for ruin, and a red sunrise.

    3. Re:We need Perry Mason! by cybermage · · Score: 1

      They couldn't get anywhere near that detailed in the OJ Simpson case

      Left to the same investigators as the Simpson case, this would almost assuredly be ruled a suicide.

    4. Re:We need Perry Mason! by weaselgrrl · · Score: 1
      Wow. They couldn't get anywhere near that detailed in the OJ Simpson case, but they can list point-for-point the assault on a dude frozen for 53 centuries. :-)

      ...and that's the difference between a case that is socio-politically a hot button topic vs. a case where any emotions of the public involved has been long long long dead...

      --
      I spent all of those years as Anonymous Coward and all I got was this lousy number (204976).
    5. Re:We need Perry Mason! by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5
      they can list point-for-point the assault on a dude frozen for 53 centuries.

      The investigation was a total BS whitewash job. They covered up all of the evidence relating to the second archer behind the grassy knoll.

  54. Copper Axe really a weapon? by The+Original+Bobski · · Score: 2

    You know, If he was really a warrior, that copper axe of his would make much more sense as a weapon than for something to chop wood as many currently think.


    ---

    --
    satire, n: 1) witty language used to convey insults or scorn; 2) a form of humor lost on most slashdot moderators.
    1. Re:Copper Axe really a weapon? by The+Original+Bobski · · Score: 4

      Copper is actually too soft a metal to be used as a weapon.

      Considering several casts were made from the blade for testing, and that some were used to successfully chop wood, its not beyond the possiblilty that is was used as a tool, although its extensive use for something like that would require frequent sharpening

      On the other hand, the edge would keep longer if it were used for the occaisional hack into soft flesh, and could be quite effective.

      Now that evidence shows he was in some kind of conflict supports the idea that it could have been a weapon.

      I do not discount the possibility that it was merely ceremonial, but to own something as useful as that for merely decorative purposes, and not have a "real" one handy for every-day use doesn't make sense.


      ---

      --
      satire, n: 1) witty language used to convey insults or scorn; 2) a form of humor lost on most slashdot moderators.
    2. Re:Copper Axe really a weapon? by radja · · Score: 2

      axes don't need to be very sharp to be used as a weapon, especially on lightly armoured targets. ok, it's a blunt axe. basically, if you're gonna hit someone on the head with a stick with a lump of copper attached, you may well bash his brains out. also, There have been instances of weapons that used weak metals on purpose: the roman footman's spear was usually thrown at the enemy, where they got stuck in their shield. the spearhead would bend, making it not only difficult to remove from the shield, it would also make it rather inaccurate when thrown back..

      //rdj

      --

      No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
      --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
    3. Re:Copper Axe really a weapon? by darkwhite · · Score: 1
      Also of interest, his bow apparently qualifies as a "longbow".

      I wonder what his THAC0 was compared to theirs... and what his proficiency with that longbow really was

      --

      [an error occurred while processing this directive]
    4. Re:Copper Axe really a weapon? by darkwhite · · Score: 1

      yep... his AC sure was low (high that is)

      --

      [an error occurred while processing this directive]
    5. Re:Copper Axe really a weapon? by mallie_mcg · · Score: 2

      You know, If he was really a warrior, that copper axe of his would make much more sense as a weapon than for something to chop wood as many currently think.

      Copper is actually too soft a metal to be used as a weapon. If this is the cave man/ ice man that i recall, he also has a lot of tattoos over his body, the axe may have been used for ceremonial reasons.

      My turn to hypothesise as to why there is an arrowhead in his back.

      * Pissed of a father, by ceremoniously killing his child.
      * Accident of some sort.
      * Rival tribe or similar.
      * Pissed of someone else, just a general pissing off, nothing too big *g*.



      How every version of MICROS~1 Windows(TM) comes to exist.

      --


      Do the following really mean anything? SCSA MCP CCSA CCNA
      --I'm not actually after an answer!
    6. Re:Copper Axe really a weapon? by loraksus · · Score: 2

      Trust me, I could kill someone with my heatsink. Wouldn't be too hard either.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    7. Re:Copper Axe really a weapon? by driftingwalrus · · Score: 2

      Ah yes! Someone with no metallurgical experience commenting on copper. Annealed, soft copper would be minimally useful - but, the way it was likely produced, by pounding into shape instead of cutting it, would work-harden the copper. It's possible for the copper to actually be very hard after being worked like that. Copper work hardens pretty rapidly.

      --
      Paul Anderson
      "I drank WHAT?!" -- Socrates
    8. Re:Copper Axe really a weapon? by flacco · · Score: 1
      You know, If he was really a warrior, that copper axe of his would make much more sense as a weapon than for something to chop wood as many currently think.

      Well, it looks like he learned a valuable lesson about stand-off weapons.

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    9. Re:Copper Axe really a weapon? by flacco · · Score: 1
      Copper is actually too soft a metal to be used as a weapon.

      But not too soft to chop wood??

      I think you'd have less wear and tear by lopping off the occasional limb or head every now and then than if you went out and chopped wood every eay.

      What about a butchering tool?

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
  55. murder or accident? by nano-second · · Score: 3

    Just because he has an arrow in his back doesn't mean it was a murder. Maybe he was hit accidentally.
    ---

    --
    I hope you're not pretending to be evil while secretly being good. That would be dishonest.
    1. Re:murder or accident? by Sokie · · Score: 1
      ...a battle would have left more corpses behind...


      Not necessarily. The only reason that the Iceman lasted this long was that his corpse was positioned in a shallow depression. Not long after his death, his corpse was overrun by an advancing glacier, which would have obliterated him had he not been in that shallow depression. As it was, the glacier went right over the top of his depression and sealed him in there. Any other corpses that were not similarly protected from the glacier would have been eradicated.

      We spent some time looking at the reasons this Iceman was preserved during our quarter on Glaciation in my Geology class last year.
      -Sokie
      --
      ------
      Where are the slash-groupies? I distinctly remember being promised slash-groupies!
    2. Re:murder or accident? by andkaha · · Score: 1

      You would be surprised to know how many archery accidents that happens each year by, eh, accident.

      It's usually by christmas time and it's usually the neighbor or a sibling who gets killed.

      Most of the time the parents are just as clueless as the kids.

      "It's just a bow and arrow, it can't possibly hurt anyone".

      Right.

      Hmmm... This didn't have too much to do with the article, had it?

      --
      It's 11pm, do you know what your deamons are up to?
    3. Re:murder or accident? by LMariachi · · Score: 1
      Not that I'm a gung-ho pro-Gulf War yahoo or anything, but in point of fact, friendly fire did not kill more US soldiers than the Iraqis did. Off the top of my head, we had 168 KIAs during Desert Storm. Something like 45 of those were friendly fire incidents. Based on my estimation of the accuracy of my own markedly non-eidetic memory, I'd give both those figures a margin of error of, oh, let's say... plus or minus 5. (too lazy to look up the code for the plus-or-minus glyph)
      Anyway, those numbers do not take into account US personnel killed in jeep accidents and such during the Desert Shield prelude, which I do not have numbers for. Regardless, those casualties would not be classified as friendly fire, but as accidents.

      This is in no way intended to justify or validate any aspect of the Gulf War, but whatever your POV, it doesn't do anybody any good to misrepresent verifiable facts.

      BTW, the death toll of the underequipped, marginally trained, unmotivated, grossly outclassed Iraqi conscripts[1] is not and will never be known. Most estimates put it at anywhere between 50,000 and 100,000. Not a bad kill ratio. And not to say hanging out in the fucking desert for several months with sand in your teeth and you can't even put up a Christmas wreath or a Playboy pinup so as not to putatively offend the delicate religious sensibilities of the local obscenely wealthy oil barons whose interests you are putting your very life on the line to protect is a cakewalk, but it's a far far cry -- to say the least -- from the jungles of Vietnam or the beaches of Normandy or the trenches of Ardennes or even the oft-overlooked Korean peninsula. Don't conflate the achievements and sacrifices and experiences of all combat veterans into one grey undifferentiated exalted blob. Not that you would, but still. Observing that, say, Tibbets != Rickenbacker doesn't neccesarily imply that Tibbets is somehow not? For real, I know there's a word for it and I can't for the life of me dredge it out of the stinking sewer of my mind... Please email ludwig@drunkenbastards.com if you have a likely candidate word. Thank you kindly, much appreciated.

      [1] Yeah, I know they weren't all forced into service, but the volunteers were a small enough percentage as to be statistically insignificant. If anything, the advantage the more skilled Iraqi soldiers had was to know to surrender to TV crews in broad daylight instead of trying to surrender to tweaked-out trigger-happy companies of armored cavalry misinterpreting the subtle nuances of the universal gesture of "Please don't kill me!" through some low-res nightvision scopes (courtesy of the lowest bidder.) But hey, as long as a few Kuwaiti zillionaire sheiks got their villas back, it was all worth it. We were acting from out ingrained American sense of justice and ethics and that type of stuff. The same type of stuff that somehow proved much less compelling when the victimized parties in question don't happen to have any money or exploitable natural resources or anything... Fuck, I mean, are you seriously proposing to send our own towheaded God-fearing cornfed American boys out to some whole other frickin' continent to possibly get maimed or even killed to keep a bunch of Rwandan jungle bunnies from hacking each other up with machetes, most of which don't even seem to have handles for chrissakes? And what exactly is in it for us? Aren't we kinda always goin on about how there's too many goddamn people in Africa anyway? And now when they take it upon themselves to reduce their own population and possibly ameliorate their whole problem with the not having enough food and all, we're supposed to go prevent them from doing this? I'm sorry, I'm a little slow and haven't really been able to follow this train of thought. Let me see if I've got this straight: You want our sons to go to their violent deaths in an uncomfortably humid environment in order to ensure continuing overpopulation ["of niggers, no less!" some peanut gallery in the back chimes in] in an already resource-stressed area, and all you can come up with by way of justification is "ethical responsibility?" I've gotta tell ya, I'm really leaning pretty heavily towards "NO" on this one. If you had something a little more concrete, a little more tangible, y'know, like making a gallon of gas fifteen cents cheaper, or something... Keeping the textile mill from leaving town for old Mexico... something. Because the "moral responsibility stuff... To be perfectly honest, I really try to get that out of the way Sunday mornings. What, you think I'm groovin on the rousing chorus of "Onward, Christian Soldiers"? Please. It's like Price Club -- you get your next three months' worth of mayonnaise or whatever, all at once, plus you save a metric assload of money buying in bulk... You get all the, I dunno, prayerful reflection and shit done in one big chunk and then you don't have to worry about it for the rest of the week. I heard the Catholics can even do whatever the fuck they want all week, y'know, fuck the babysitter, do a little crank, kill the neighbor's yapping little psycho dachshund, drive around real fast, rent a porno, anything, and then once a week they go tell a priest about whatever fucked-up shit they did, and the priest goes like "Say the Lord's Prayer ten times" or something and they're clear! In the black! And the priest is even behind a screen or a veil or something so you don't have to even deal with observing his reaction, like when you go to a store to get some beer or whatever and you're paying for it and you pull out a rolled-up bill that you hafta unroll in front of the cashier and he gives you this evil eye like "you fucking lowlife scumbag coke fiend" and with him it's like Hey, aren't you supposed to be professional or something? Where in your official 7-11 job responsibilities pamphlet is the part about passing judgement on your PAYING CUSTOMERS who just need a coupla more beers to get back down offa there and maybe catch some z's or at least lie restfully in bed though technically still "awake" but I heard scientists say that's almost as good as actually sleeping, if you can just chill and relax quietly and also whatever you're watching on TV probably shouldn't be too exciting, like watch a cooking show or some nature documentary instead of MTV or the NHRA Summernationals or worst of all a pay-per-view wrestling event because then you'll not only be hopped up but your bank account will be like thirty bucks lighter too and believe me, you will be kicking yourself in the head as hard as possible later on. Stick with the nature stuff. Animals are cute, and also they often do really violent shit to each other, but nonetheless it's somehow relaxing when they do it. Whereas when you're watching a bouncer bang some drunkard's head against the side of a truck it's not really relaxing at all -- I mean, it can be what you'd call satisfying, but it's by no stretch a mellow spectacle. It angries up the blood. Oh, yeah, also, with the nature documentaries, stick with, like, mammals and reptiles and fish and birds. Basically, stay away from the arthropods, because you know those bugs all over your skin that you were drinking to get rid of in the first place? If you watch some insect thing, they'll be back in full force like that.

      Another good thing to watch is the home improvement shows. Not the crappy sitcom where the crappy stand-up comedian acts like a fucking dick to everyone around him and somehow thinks having a crappy local public access show makes him a celebrity or something and all his kids are dickwads too, even the one who when he was younger was kinda sarcastic and funny but he did a Tina Yothers and had that real unfortunate "awkward phase" and came out of it looking all puffy and weird and not anywhere near as telegenic as he used to be before puberty. You know what I'm talking about. Anyway, the shows in question are like what the quality-bereft sitcom is making fun of -- This Old House, New Yankee Workshop, that sort of thing. I don't know the details of exactly what went on with Bob Vila getting fired for "conflict of interest" or something because he did some commercials for Sears Craftsman or something, but whatever. He had kind of a dickwad vibe himself. Ooh, almost forgot -- the absolute King of Soothing TV is the late Bob Ross. Yeah, okay, kinda banal finished products art-wise, but I learned a lot of little tricks from him. How to do a pine tree without doing each needle individually, things like that. Who'da thunk you could use the fan brush in so many ways?

      And his voice has sorta the same hypnotic effect as Bhagwan Shree Ragneesh's. "These aren't the droids you're looking for."

      pause rant

    4. Re:murder or accident? by MikeyNg · · Score: 1

      Just because he has an arrow in his back doesn't mean it was a murder. Maybe he was hit accidentally.

      What do you mean? "It just went off!" or something like that? This is a bow and arrow we're talking about, not a gun.

      Actually, I think he was probably caught in the hut of some other hunter's wife, and as he was running away, he got pelted in the back. Who would have thought that a cowardly adulterous lech would garner so much attention 10,000 years later? Hey! Gives me hope for making myself famous...

      --
      Where the wind blows, the tumbleweed goes.
    5. Re:murder or accident? by naasking · · Score: 1

      Why wouldn't the husband take his stuff too? Presumably, axes, bows and arrows took alot of time and effort to make. That makes them valuable and useful.

      -----
      "I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception."

    6. Re:murder or accident? by RainbowSix · · Score: 2

      I think it was the Gulf war, where we killed more of our own Soldiers than the enemy did. It could have been hunting season or something and he just got too far ahead.. got hit by an arrow intended for an animal.
      --------

      --
      --------
      It's OK to be social, just don't tell anyone about it.
    7. Re:murder or accident? by (void*) · · Score: 1
      Caveman 1: Hey Bernie! Lookit wat I juz shot!

      Caveman 2: Oww! It's me, you fool! It's me!

    8. Re:murder or accident? by dmccarty · · Score: 2
      So we've got a guy leaving a fairly warm valley in some haste but well prepared (had eaten, brought no food, but had an ax, a bow, and 14 arrows), getting assaulted about 8 hours later, shot from behind and below (someone chasing him?), and left there with all his stuff.

      If the facts of what you described are true, from the description it sounds a whole lot like a tribal banishment, with the "banishee" being hunted and killed shortly after being banished.

      (For a movie that illustrates this but is so horrible that it's funny, see The Naked Prey.)

      --
      Have fun: Join D.N.A. (National Dyslexics Association)
    9. Re:murder or accident? by JASP2 · · Score: 1

      The article is misleading. They make it sound like this is shocking news that he may have been killed in a conflict. If you read Konrad Spindler's book "The man in the Ice" you will see that some researcher's came to that very same conclusion back in 1993. It's an excellent book by the way.. I highly recomended to anyone interested in Forensic Anthropology -jasp2

    10. Re:murder or accident? by Some+Dumbass... · · Score: 1

      Aw, c'mon, the hunting accident theory isn't so ridiculous.

      As a side note, would all the pre-historic weaponry experts on SlashDot please stand up? Any Anthropologists here? No? Yeah, that's what I thought. We're all giving uninformed opinions pal - you, me and everyone else.

    11. Re:murder or accident? by ZanshinWedge · · Score: 4

      riiiiight, it's really easy to accidentally hit someone with an arrow.

      "It just went off when I was cleaning it (and after I had strung, drawn, aimed, and loosed it)."

      Sheesh, who would have thought uninformed opinions would run rampant on slashdot?! Errrr, uh, nevermind then.

    12. Re:murder or accident? by The_Steel_General · · Score: 1
      "Good science requires ..."

      "Science"? This is Slashdot!

      Of course I'm making a lot of cultural assumptions. The scientists who originally thought he was just a lost hunter made a lot of cultural assumptions, too. Even though the guy's equipment looked like a veritable bronze-age arsenal...You have to start somewhere. And I'm not trying to get my comment peer-reviewed or anything: I just think it sounds like a crime of passion.

      "I even recall hearing once that it was custom for a man to lend his wife to a visiting guest."

      I've heard of a similar custom in motorcycle gangs, with the additional comment that the same courtesy was never extended with motorcycles. But there would still be rituals to observe, and I think this guy didn't follow them. Whatever "they" were.

      Just on general principles, here's replies to a couple of other comments:

      • If it was a battle, I'd still expect more evidence, if only an extra arrowhead or two. The point about the glacier erasing the evidence is well taken, though.
      • Evil spirits, banishment, and similar situations make me think of ritual. Especially rituals that would ensure the guy was dead. A single arrow to the back doesn't seem sufficient, but that's open to debate.
      • I'd say that a jealous husband wouldn't take his victim's property because a) having done the deed, he felt guilty and b) he didn't want evidence of his crime. In other words, it's a motive that would make taking property unlikely.
      And of course, IANAArcheologist/Anthropologist/forensic specialist, although I have watched Quincy.

      (Which, incidentally, had a scene not unlike what happened here: Skeleton is found, evidently that of D.B. Cooper -- hanging from a tree, parachute attached, some money, etc. After trying to determine cause of death for a while, Quincy has the bright idea of x-raying the skeleton. The x-rays show a knife tip embedded in the ribs -- guy was murdered while helpless, by an accomplice I think it was....)

      TSG

    13. Re:murder or accident? by The_Steel_General · · Score: 2
      "From an article concerning the Iceman's last meal on the Nova site"

      In case anyone wanted to ask how Iceman ate his last meal on the Nova site...

      Don't bother, I just beat you to it.

      TSG

    14. Re:murder or accident? by The_Steel_General · · Score: 5
      From an article concerning the Iceman's last meal on the Nova site (sorry, lost the URL):

      "Oeggl [the guy who analyzed the last meal based on a tiny scrap of food from the Iceman's colon] readily acknowledges that scientists may never know what prompted the Iceman to leave the relatively hospitable valley with no water or food to speak of (a single sloe berry was found with his remains) and try to cross the mountain at a time of year when several feet of snow easily could have obscured the topography of the steep and rocky Alpine ridge."

      So we've got a guy leaving a fairly warm valley in some haste but well prepared (had eaten, brought no food, but had an ax, a bow, and 14 arrows), getting assaulted about 8 hours later, shot from behind and below (someone chasing him?), and left there with all his stuff.

      My vote is for jealous husband, frankly -- a battle would have left more corpses behind, a robber would have taken his stuff, and the Iceman was leaving someplace safe and warm very quickly -- and very well-armed.

      TSG

    15. Re:murder or accident? by Exedore · · Score: 1
      Presumably, axes, bows and arrows took alot of time and effort to make. That makes them valuable and useful.

      Not to mention identifiable as well. "Hey, Thok, isn't that Gargag's axe you have there? Say, whatever happened to Gargag, anyway?"

      --

      I take drugs seriously.

    16. Re:murder or accident? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Hmmph. Perhaps he was bent over his work on his new bow, and shot from behind by someone who snuck up on him? That way the arrow would enter his back at an angle consistant with "below".

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    17. Re:murder or accident? by snake_dad · · Score: 1
      but had an ax, a bow, and 14 arrows

      15. :-)

      --
      karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
    18. Re:murder or accident? by Anixamander · · Score: 1

      Seem's like a perfect opportunity for TLC to do one of their shows featuring cold-case detectives. Ha ha ha.
      --

      --
      Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball(TM)
    19. Re:murder or accident? by vkilmorr · · Score: 1

      Where is Shirlock Holmes when you need him to set the record straight? I am a poor excuse, but I'll give it a go anyway.

      The main question that needs to be answered is: where is the shaft of the said arrow? Did it break off at the head instantly on impact (leaving no trace of sinew or wood whatsoever)? If so, what drove such a tiny arrowhead so deep into his shoulder such that it wouldn't be found by x-ray for 10 years?

      Then are we to assume that he pulled the shaft cleanly and completely out of his own back? Or did the murderer unsuccessfully try to retrieve his own arrow (leaving the stack of 15 or so other ones there).

      I am completely ignorant of the facts of this case, but I say: no shaft, no crime. Whether or not the arrow was intentionally fired at him, I doubt that it was the cause of his death (elementary, Watson!).

  56. JFK Conspiracy by akiy · · Score: 1

    Meanwhile, conspiracy experts are poring over the pictures, and videos of the JFK assassination for any clues to the whereabouts of the Iceman murder. Theorists claim that the "magic arrow" could have killed both the Iceman and JFK from evidence found in the Zapfruder movie (frames 112, 133, and 149). The Iceman is claimed by some to be a Cuban refugee who had contacted Oswald earlier that year.

    --

    --
    http://www.aikiweb.com - AikiWeb Aikido Information

  57. Re:It Just Went Off by radja · · Score: 2

    and since the burglar gets a lot more exercise, he's a much smaller target than your average american couchpotato...

    //rdj

    --

    No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
    --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
  58. Re:Another Support by operagost · · Score: 1
    Yeah you people are such champions of free speech, free software, and free lunch until someone makes a wry comment on the political debate over firearms. Pretty soon you'll all be futilely defending your Linux boxes from the government DMCA enforcement stormtroopers with sharp #2 pencils.

    Much of the world is free now... how do you think it got that way?

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  59. Re:What Men do for a pretty face! by operagost · · Score: 1

    I have doubts as to whether semen can be identified as such after so much time, even when froze, so I did a little research. Sounds like it was just wild speculation. Here

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  60. Re:It Just Went Off by Gyver · · Score: 1

    Why stop there when you can convert some of these to fully automatic? Then you can accidentally shoot somebody several times.

    Actually I find that bludgeoning somebody to death is much more rewarding than shooting somebody from across the room. It makes me feel I've accomplished something.

    set sarcasm=off

  61. Columbo by paranoid.android · · Score: 1

    "I've got just one more question for ya, Grog. If you say you were just shooting in self defense, why was the victim shot in the back?"

  62. Re:It Just Went Off by dimator · · Score: 1

    Exactly! In addition, I need semi-automatic weapons to defend my home and my family!

    (please note my sarcasm)


    ---

    --
    python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
  63. Re:OOG SPEECHLESS!!! by dimator · · Score: 1

    Seriously. I love when OOG posts, he should do so more often.
    ---

    --
    python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
  64. What Men do for a pretty face! by yittrix · · Score: 1


    He was probably murdered because he looked at the killer's girlfriend.. :)

    --
    Yittrix
    1. Re:What Men do for a pretty face! by uroshnor · · Score: 1

      Actually, if this was the guy I think it was ... They dug him out and there was a bit of an international incident with various countries claiming ownership of the "noble savage who died tragically", with I think the French, Italians and Swiss all having a go at it. When the scientists announced they found semen in the stomach contents the Swiss and Italians stopped claiming ownership ! So it may not have been the girlfriend that was the problem ... Of course there a bunch of legitimate explanations of how it got there besides the person in question batting for the other team, but I recall I found it very funny at the time. ( and I should note that I have no intrinsic problem with the recreational consumption of semen by either sex )

  65. Whoops! by sg3000 · · Score: 2

    I'm sure he was accidentally shot, and then just left there to freeze for us to find him thousands of years later. "Whoops! Well, I'll get vindicated by somebody when the computer is invented," Og the killer caveman surely said.

    If he were accidentally shot, don't you think the person who shot him would have carried him back to wherever? They did do burials back then. Even elephants bury their dead.

    No, the only time you kill someone and leave 'em in a snowbank is because you're pretty sure the statute of limitations is longer than 5,000 years.

    --
    Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
    1. Re:Whoops! by Alien54 · · Score: 2
      Even elephants bury their dead.

      This transcript from a short "Pulse of the Planet" radio piece sheds light on that legend

      In the first century AD, the Roman chronicler Pliny reported that elephants collect and bury the bones of their dead. Over the years, many nature writers have remarked on elephants' reactions to the deaths of their kin and companions. But what really happens when an elephant dies? I'm Jim Metzner, and this is the Pulse of the Planet, presented by the American Museum of Natural History.

      We're listening to the sounds of elephants in Africa.

      "There are legends about elephants creating graveyards of the bones of other elephants. I believe this is just a legend. I have never seen it."

      Katy Payne is author of Silent Thunder: In The Presence of Elephants.

      "What I have seen though is that whenever an elephant comes to the bones of another elephant, it will stop and sniff and touch and roll over and fondle and carry and move and displace and pick up again and again those bones. And particularly tusks. Whether there's individual recognition of the source of the bones I don't know, but the bones are very interesting to other elephants. How they respond when other animals die is with obvious symptoms of grief, despair and distress initially. They are called back and back to explore the corpse, called back by their own desires to return. And eventually when they leave the corpse there is obvious evidence of grieving. A female having lost a calf stayed with the herd which accompanied her near to standing next to the corpse for several days and left reluctantly with a herd and then fifty kilometers away, turned back and went back to the calf. So there's all this kind of memory and grief.

      Additional funding for Pulse of the Planet has been provided by the National Science Foundation. I'm Jim Metzner.

      >>>>>>

      I'm sure he was accidentally shot, and then just left there to freeze for us to find him thousands of years later.

      Actually, he was likely shot and severly wounded, and tried to escape over the mountains as the storm closed in.

      No, the only time you kill someone and leave 'em in a snowbank is because you're pretty sure the statute of limitations is longer than 5,000 years.

      The day we have to pay for crime from past lifes is the day we all have to worry. Currently the rules are that anything that happened from past lives is not very important. With all of the junk that happens in one life, and what we know of history, it could be very nasty.

      --
      "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  66. In further news... by jackal! · · Score: 4

    ...the cause of the death of the Human Torch is yet unknown.

    --

    Who moderates the meta-moderators?

    1. Re:In further news... by Ser\/o · · Score: 1

      the F-4 was the first thing I thought of too :)

      --
      -Just because you're not paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you.
  67. CT Scan by tgdwyer · · Score: 2

    Maybe I'm missing something here but how is it that in the course of 10 years since the body was discovered there were dozens of wild theories about the cause of death and nobody noticed he had a critical wound in his back? They could see the pores in his skin but not a hole from an arrow? AND they did a biopsy of his stomach contents before they took an X-Ray? Or was it only possible to see the flint arrow head in a CT Scan? There's even something that looks like an arrow shaft sticking out of his shoulder in the photo! (Though I suppose that could be something the scientists put there)

  68. Re:Suicide? by MissNachos · · Score: 1

    sorry, not a kid. a 25 year old geeky mother of a 4 month old.

    --
    if you want to make God laugh, tell him your plans
  69. Suicide? by MissNachos · · Score: 5

    I say he fell on it and killed himself, since in those days no one played FPS video games.

    --
    if you want to make God laugh, tell him your plans
    1. Re:Suicide? by dynoman7 · · Score: 1

      ...since in those days no one played FPS video games.

      Iceman #1 almost dodged Iceman #2's arrow.


      If the only tool you have is a hammer, you tend to see every problem as a nail.

      --
      Blarf.
    2. Re:Suicide? by dopefish3 · · Score: 1

      Probably not but they did have people with the exaxt same IQ as people portrayed in MTV's Jackass. (I.E. if they do something funny/stupid then I do something funny/stupid too). 'nuff said

  70. Re:How do they know it wasn't an accident ? by ReadbackMonkey · · Score: 3

    It it was an accident, why would he have died alone on a mountain?
    Why wouldn't his friend who accidently shot him have helped him down the mountain?
    The story said he was shot in the shoulder and took some time to die.

    Why do you claim it was an accident? What are you trying to hide? Where were you on Thursday January 12, 5000 B.C.?

  71. Microsoft Did it by quakeaddict · · Score: 1

    ...they must have...somehow.

    --
    I'm still working on a clever footer.
  72. Re:It Just Went Off by emmons · · Score: 1

    Yeah right! Ban arrows! Sue the arrow companies! We can no longer allow evil arrowhead corporations to put dangerous artifacts in the hands of our children!

    (please note my sarcasm)

    ----

    --
    Do you even know anything about perl? -- AC Replying to Tom Christiansen post.
  73. His Murder's Name Was Ah-nold...... by cybrpnk · · Score: 2

    Let's see... he's 5300 years old, say a generation is 20 years, so 5 generations per hundred years, 5*53 = 265 generations of offspring lost by his death, say at 1.1 kids average per generation, his death prevented the birth of 1.1^265 = over 93 BILLION people!!! - enough to toally swamp the planet. So obviously he was killed by a terminator robot from the future to insure his offspring wouldn't lead to the destruction of the intelligent computers we will build in the next 50 years. This theory is further supported by the fact that he was found at/near/in Austria. Everybody knows those futuristic terminator robots speak with an Austrian accent. And another thing...a coverup is underway!!! The arrowhead was pure titanium!!! They're trying to cover that up by showing some flint fake on the news!!!!

    1. Re:His Murder's Name Was Ah-nold...... by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 1

      You know, he might have already had children..

      --

  74. More cool stuff about Otzi... by pongo000 · · Score: 2

    ...can be found here. There was also an article in a recent Discover issue about his last meal, June or July, but it doesn't seem to be on the magazine's website.

  75. Re:It Just Went Off by Steeltoe · · Score: 1

    Arrows don't kill people, people kill people.

    People don't kill people, videogames kill people!

    - Steeltoe

  76. Re:Here you can visit the Museum of the Iceman (ww by Steeltoe · · Score: 1

    What a coincidence! ;)

    - Steeltoe

  77. Inspiring? by drnomad · · Score: 1

    Micheal, how does this story give you inspiration on how we've killed eachother over the years? Could I suggest a cruel-murder-contest?
    --

  78. Cease and desist! by OmegaDan · · Score: 2
    Hello, I represent Og, the man wrongfully acused of "murdering" john doe #1 - the iceman. I would like to remind you that my client has not been convicted of any crime as of yet -- and that times were very difficult in Ogs day, and if he did commit this crime, it was most ceartinly a survival necessity.

    Archibald Feller and Associates

    1. Re:Cease and desist! by Imperial+Tacohead · · Score: 2

      I, for one, would like to see what OOG THE CAVEMAN has to say about this. He's almost undoubtedly the only person from that era still alive, and might provide valuable information to the investigation into the iceman's death.

    2. Re:Cease and desist! by buhdabuddy · · Score: 1

      I don't really think that killing someone was a "crime" at that time, I am sure it was just immoral, so lets just hope Og had a guilty conscience.

      --
      Don't Upset the Buhda
  79. Re:Question on Italian law... by cybermage · · Score: 1

    I sort of feel sorry for the officer assigned to this case.

    It was obviously a conspiracy involving everyone who was alive at the time. The only solution is to sentence them all to death. Oh, wait...

  80. It Just Went Off by cybermage · · Score: 5

    Nothing like a pre-historic hunting accident:

    Officer: Why did you shoot your friend in the back with that arrow?

    Og: He was wearing his deer skin. Before I realized it was him, the bow just went off.

    Officer: Well, we could haul him down the mountain, but let's just leave him there. That way when he's found people can speculate wildly about what happened.

    1. Re:It Just Went Off by kimmop · · Score: 1
      Officer: Why did you shoot your friend in the back with that arrow?

      Og: I didn't know it was loaded!

      --

      --

      --
      Binaries may die but source code lives forever

    2. Re:It Just Went Off by mdw2 · · Score: 4

      Arrows don't kill people, people kill people.

      Want some indy electronic (and other) music?

      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
    3. Re:It Just Went Off by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      You're living in a protect provided by people having semi-automatic weapson in thier homes. If there wasn't a possiablity of having a ten round clip unloaded into a crimal chrest, more people would do the evil on thier minds. Also, we can't keep drugs out of people hands, how are we going to keep gun out thier hands?

      Please learn how to spell before any future attempts to make a point.

    4. Re:It Just Went Off by stew77 · · Score: 1

      How come people are more likely to shoot their family members instead of burglars?

      --

  81. Who Done It? by meckardt · · Score: 1

    In related news, FBI investigators said that they would be questioning scientists in a search for suspects, and motives for the murder.

    1. Re:Who Done It? by Paintthemoon · · Score: 5

      And the Justice Dept. denied that any of the missing FBI bows & arrows had anything to do with the death.

      --
      Be part of the world's largest collaborative work of art: http://www.paintthemoon.org
  82. His first words after we thaw him from the ice by (void*) · · Score: 2

    Ouch!!!

  83. Re:Hunting accident? by biohazard99 · · Score: 2

    bowhunters (at least in my state) do not wear hunter orange, only rifle/pistol/shotgun hunters are required to wear hunter orange during deer/small game season. During Turkey season, everyone gets to wear camo and you are stationary, so you really do look like a bush. They suggest you tie a orange ribbon to the tree above your position though.

  84. Re:Hit from below by Catbeller · · Score: 2

    NO ONE was very tall. You giant six footers are historical aberrations. Most adult men ranged in size from five to five and half feet tall for the last hundred thousand years, I'd speculate.

    Look at old suits of armor the next time you are in a museum.

  85. Signs of murder common in ancient bodies by payslee · · Score: 1

    Murder seems to be a fairly common way for ancient corpses to have met their ends. There are some interesting sites on the peat bog bodies, found in many areas of the UK and Ireland. Many of them have their skulls bashed in, their throats cut, and IIRC, one was even stabbed in the back.

    A good starting place is here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/overkill.shtm l

    --
    Doing my part to piss off the religious right.
  86. Re:The submission left this out: by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 4

    Scientists also point to a series of cave paintings depicting violent acts as probably having desensitized the killer, allowing him to take another life. "As you can see, even primitive man faced the problem of violence in the media, and this poor chap paid the price."

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  87. The submission left this out: by MotorMachineMercenar · · Score: 2

    "Although the cause of death has been established, the scientists are still arguing where the arrow was fired. Some say it was shot from a nearby cave full of primitive cave writing, some opponents claim it was fired from a closer grassy knoll. Some even go as far as saying there was more than one shooter, since the 'magic arrow' - as the scientists started to call it - traveled through Otzi in a manner which would be 'physically impossible and ballistically preposterous' for a single arrow, as expressed by one scientist, who prefers to remain anonymous"

    --
    "We have an A-Bomb...what more do you want, mermaids?" --I.I. Rabi, speaking in defense of Robert Oppenheimer
    1. Re:The submission left this out: by gordon_schumway · · Score: 1

      Was Judas Priest around then?

      --

      Ha! I kill me!

  88. Re:Hit from below by Nastard · · Score: 1

    "He was bending over at the time he was shot"

    Maybe he was the first goatse.cx troll.

  89. Question on Italian law... by tbarrie · · Score: 4

    There's no statue of limitation on murder, is there?

    I sort of feel sorry for the officer assigned to this case.

    1. Re:Question on Italian law... by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1
      Hmmm, Italian law does have a statue of limitation for murder, I think it's something like 25 years.

      So assuming Ötzi's age determination was even remotely correct, his murderer is off the hook. :)

  90. Conditt denies any affairs ... by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 1

    In other news: Conditt denies he had any affairs with the ancient iceman, willing to take another lie detector test.

  91. Hunting accident? by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 2

    As I recall, he wasn't wearing his bright orange jacket, just some brown fabrics and leather. He was probably mistaken for a deer or sheep by another hunter, and shot accidentally. This is yet another example of what happens when people don't prepare properly before going hunting. Bows don't kill people, people kill people.

    --
    Freedom: "I won't!"
  92. Here's The Interesting Part by Self+Bias+Resistor · · Score: 3

    According to this article by New Scientist, the arrow was discovered almost by accident. A CT scan performed in April by team specialist Paul Gostner showed no sign of foreign objects. Then three weeks ago, he took a chest X-ray that showed the outline of the arrow. A second examination of the CT scan confirmed the finding, as did the physical examination with pathologist Eduard Egarter which showed a two-centimetre cut in the skin matching the trajectory of the arrow. It turns out that because the arrow lies between the shoulder bone and the ribs, it would only show up on a scan of the side. And since all previous scans had been of only the front and back of the body, they hadn't found it until now.

    Kind of makes you think how some of the greatest scientific discoveries were made almost entirely by accident (like how they discovered the electron, electric motors or radiation).

    Self Bias Resistor

    --

    ----------
    When the pin is pulled, Mr. Grenade is no longer our friend.

  93. I loved this line... by Rimbo · · Score: 2

    "But using a technique called computerized tomography, a sophisticated X-ray that allows for multidimensional imaging, ..."

    They used a freaking CAT scan, folks. Something you can get in just about every hospital nowadays.

    Yeah, I bet that was a real tough one to come up with, wasn't it? "Gee, maybe if we look inside the body with these sophisticated tools we've had for decades, we might see something?"

  94. Seems somewhat illogical. by iluvitar · · Score: 1
    He may have been killed in an ambush or a sneak attack. Or perhaps he was surrounded by enemies, shot from behind while focusing his attention on a threat in front of him.
    If you were in a battle, then wouldn't there be other dead people near you? And if you were alone, wouldn't your killer take your stuff? You'd think that cavemen would know about looting and such. At least take the poor guy's arrows that so fittingly matched the one you used to shoot him with (It's not like you can't use them with your own bow or something).

    If you were going to die like that, with all your stuff, it most probably had to be an accident you yourself caused alone. Either that, or your killer shot you and they didn't chase you, letting you die somewhere else.
  95. An Early Trial of the DMCA by EschewObfuscation · · Score: 2
    Togg: Oetzi, why'd you sell me this bow without a string? What the hell good is it?

    Oetzi: Why, Togg, you bought a HUNTING bow, right? Specifically, a DEER hunting bow.

    Togg: Yeah.

    Oetzi: Well, how am I supposed to make sure you only use it for deer huinting? Why, if I wasn't watching you, you might go off and hunt boar, or bears, or, heck, just about anything! You could even use it as a WAR bow, and not a hunting bow at all!

    Togg: But I paid you for it! I should be able to use it however I want!

    Oetzi: No, Togg. You bought the RIGHT to USE the bow for deer hunting. The bow itself is still mine.

    Togg: Well, what if I just use one of my own strings?

    [Togg takes a bowstring from his pouch, and begins to string the bow]

    Oetzi: NO!!! That's a circumvention device! You can be trampled by mammoths just for carrying that around! I'm calling the Elders!

    [TWANG]

    Togg: Well, that's the end of that...



    (email addr is at acm, not mca)
    We are Number One. All others are Number Two, or lower.

    --

    (email addr is at acm, not mca)
    We are Number One. All others are Number Two, or lower.
    --The Sphinx
  96. Also in the article by ellem · · Score: 2

    "Apparently the deceased knew he was in danger and was perhaps fleeing to another village. Found on a cave wall in a cave the deceased was know to dwell was the following:

    I am scared. Many come for me. I hope I can ahhhhhh."
    ---

    --
    This .sig is fake but accurate.
  97. Proof in the Pictures by dmccarty · · Score: 2

    For anyone interested in seeing the xray of the wound, you can see it at http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/p/ap/20010725/wl/ital y_mystery_iceman_rom104.html.

    --
    Have fun: Join D.N.A. (National Dyslexics Association)
  98. Killed over a Woman by rfg · · Score: 1

    The scientists speculate it was an ambush or a hunting accident. Nonsense. The guy was shot in the back as he ran away with a girl or from a fight over a woman. Nothing has changed in 5000 years.

  99. When will you idiots learn? by imagineer_bob · · Score: 1
    "being stabbed in the back is not a recent dot.com kind of thing."

    NO dot-commer was stabbed in the back!

    These kids, mostly inexperienced with no INDUSTRY TRACK RECORD volunteered to work at companies with no revenue and no business model. THEY WERE GREEDY AND GOT WHAT THEY DESERVED.

  100. OOG SPEECHLESS!!! by OOG_THE_CAVEMAN · · Score: 5

    OOG ALWAYS WONDER WHAT HAPPEN TO COUSIN THARG SINCE HE DISAPPEAR IN MOUNTAIN!!! OOG THINK THARG FREEZE TO DEATH OR EATEN BY MAMOUTH BUT NOW ANGRY TO LEARN THARG MURDERED!!!

    OOG THINK CAVEMAN GROK BEHIND MURDER (SINCE OJ SIMPSON NOT ALIVE AT THAT TIME AND USE KNIFE INSTEAD OF ARROW), BUT OOG PROBABLY HAVE TO HIRE UNFROZEN CAVEMAN LAWYER CIRROC TO BE ABLE TO BRING REAL KILLER TO JUSTICE!!! OOG AVENGE DEAD COUSIN THARG!!!

    --
    OOG THE OPEN SOURCE CAVEMAN!!! OOG BREAK HEAD WITH OPEN SOURCE CD!!!
    1. Re:OOG SPEECHLESS!!! by elefantstn · · Score: 4
      OOG THINK CAVEMAN GROK BEHIND MURDER
      You know you're a nerd when...

      ...you originally read "GROK" as a verb instead of a name.

      I need more fresh air.
      --
      If it ain't broke, you need more software.
    2. Re:OOG SPEECHLESS!!! by Imperial+Tacohead · · Score: 1

      That was uplifting, Oog. We're all here for you in your moment of loss.

  101. He was a DSCA violator! by codepunk · · Score: 1

    Digital Stone-age Copyright Act

    --


    Got Code?
  102. Great?! by FortKnox · · Score: 2

    Somehow it's inspiring to see just how long we've been killing each other. This story is great in so many ways.

    How is murder in any sense of the term great in so many ways?
    Look, man was civilized enough to kill one another!
    I think its sad in so many ways that we can't stop killing one another...

    --
    Fnord is that feeling you get when you reach for a Snickers and come back with a Slurpee.

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    1. Re:Great?! by WildBeast · · Score: 1

      If we had enough killers, we wouldn't be 7 billion on the planet.
      I guess you're not familiar with the term overpopulation?

  103. Here you can visit the Museum of the Iceman (www)! by sbenno · · Score: 2
    Hehe that's kinda funny to see coverage of the Oetzi (aka the Iceman) on Slashdot.
    I happen to be from that province where the Oetzi was found aka South Tyrol.

    The museum where the iceman is exposed is located in Bolzano - Italy.

    Here's the homepage:

    www.iceman.it

    or alternatively see here:

    www.provinz.bz.it

    cheers,
    Benno.

    www.linuxaudiodev.org The Home Of Linux Audio Development

  104. Back and to the left... by DavidBrown · · Score: 3

    I have examined all the evidence, and I can conclusively demonstrate the invalidity of the researchers' so-called "single arrow" theory. No one arrow could have caused such damage. There must have been another archer, perhaps firing from the grassy knoll.

    --
    144l. ph34r my 133t l3g4l 5k1lz!
  105. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  106. Old News! Read the book! by JASP2 · · Score: 1

    in 1993 Konrad Spindler came to the conclusion that this guy was wounded in battle and was trying to escape over the mountains when he died of his injuries. One theing the article fails to mention was that the 14 arrows were in the process of being made and his bow was in the process of being repaired. Now either he was a really bad shot (not likely if he surrvived to adulthood at that time) or he had been in a fight that required expending more arrows than a typical hunting trip. Anyway, the book is "The Man in the Ice".. highly recomended!

    1. Re:Old News! Read the book! by JASP2 · · Score: 1

      Yes, the arrowhead is new news.. but the article makes it sound like the "act of violence" death is a whole new concept. Konrad made a very brilliant and detailed deduction that people argued with at the time... and now his theory is confirmed. They did x-ray at the time discovery. If you read the article, this was a new type of x-ray that they were using when they found the arrowhead. The currators who just discovered the arrowhead were also examining the body at the time of discovery, so missing the arrow-head cannot be entirely blamed on Konrad. examining mummies is not as straight forward as it might sound.

    2. Re:Old News! Read the book! by lugumbashi · · Score: 1

      Yeah but Spindler failed to notice the 2cm stonearrowhead in his back. This is not old news. The first thing you do with a mummy is x-ray it. IAll the same can't fault his deduction that he had suffered "a disaster". Kindof like finding a smoking gun, but missing the bullet hole in the corpse.

  107. um... by evilpaul13 · · Score: 1

    it was a hunting accident I swear!

  108. and then... by bigmaddog · · Score: 2

    Having shot the iceman, the archer then proclaimed: I own j00!
    ----------

    --

    Even as you read this, your pants are strangling your loins! Aaa!

  109. The real question is... by WildBeast · · Score: 1

    did they find the killer?

  110. Last rites by WildBeast · · Score: 1

    A small and barely visible message was found on the arrowhead: Once you get to hell, tell'em I sent ya, you'll get a group discount.
    The look on the scientists face? Priceless.

  111. Re:actual cause of death? by dohnut · · Score: 1


    Heh, reminds me of that FarSide comic where paleontologists find, encased in ice,
    a prehistoric man with a surprised look on his face sitting in his prehistoric out-house.

    The caption was something like, "Proof that the Ice Age caught prehistoric man completely off guard."

    --
    Stupider like a fox! - H.S.
  112. Figures by atheos · · Score: 1

    Ya, some things never change. Mankind has always stabbed the next guy in the back.

  113. Some things never change. by atheos · · Score: 1

    Mankind. always stabbing the next guy in the back.

  114. Lucy... by mirko · · Score: 1

    I believe Lucy should have asked him to take his cape off before attempting to sew it with a silex needle.
    --

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
  115. Those sneaky supervillains... by mblase · · Score: 2

    ...Magneto knew just the tool to use, that bastard! Iceman, you will be avenged!

  116. Visit the mummy online by weaselgrrl · · Score: 2
    The South Tyrol Museum of Archaelogy has a very nice web site about Oetzi, his clothing and his gear. Visit at: http://www.archaeologiemuseum.it/f06_ice_uk.html

    What I found interesting was that he seemed to be in the process of making arrows and a bow. He had 12 unfinished arrow shafts and 2 arrows ready to be shot. Also, he carried a bow that was still being worked and not yet strung.

    That he was off on a hunting trip was the original hypothesis. But between the murder and the fact that he was still making his weaponry, I would suspect some other (social?) situation brought him into the mountains, and to his untimely demise.

    --
    I spent all of those years as Anonymous Coward and all I got was this lousy number (204976).
  117. doh! by hemna · · Score: 1

    Must have been GREAT (x 10^10) Grandpapy Gates!

  118. Re:[OT] Other missing persons sought w same effort by ROBOKATZ · · Score: 1
    JFK Jr as a person certainly did not merit anyone giving two shits about. But with his father being such an important former President, the country owed it to the family to contribute.

    Now, the only reason for the big missing persons investigation, is that the media hopes that insignificant congressman did it, so they're hounding the hell out of the PD and creating a public relations nightmare for them, waiting and praying for them to arrest Mr. insignificant congressman. If they found her body in an alley and tracked down some bum that mugged her and shot her, or "worse" yet, she simply fled to a commune and changed her name or something, we probably wouldn't even hear about it because the media would drop it completely as soon as they found out Mr. insignificant congressman had nothing to do with it (which he probably doesn't).

  119. It just goes to show how long ... by ignavus · · Score: 1

    ... the Mob have been in business.

    --
    I am anarch of all I survey.
  120. Re:In a related story... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    Didn't I see you in a cave painting episode of Clubs where you were driving a mastidon after eating many fermenting fruits?

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  121. In a related story... by AndroidCat · · Score: 2

    Police are now looking a suspect in the Iceman case: "Thargg of the Mountains". He is considered armed and dangerous.

    When asked about the 5000+ year age of the case, Inspector Podder replied "There is no statute of limitation on murder."

    Anyone with any information on Thargg should call 1-555-222-TIPS.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  122. How do they know it wasn't an accident ? by tmark · · Score: 2

    Is it possible several Icemen went out on a hunt and this one got killed by an arrow gone astray ? Wouldn't that be as parisimonious as any of the scenarios presented (if it was a grudge/war, I think you might expect to see some sort of mutilation) ? Or does an accident just make less interesting copy ?

  123. Re:murder or accident? - it's a morality tale... by hillct · · Score: 2

    It may have been an accident but it's a much more interesting and assuring - it's good to see we aren't any worse people now than we were then - if it were murder. The belief that it was murder creates the potential for a sociological analysis (rabid theorization) but this will give one grad student a topic for his thesis, which I suppose is an inportant goal in and of itself

    This practice is vary common, especially in the field of history. I'm going to stop short of aleging revisionist history, and simply say that it is common to evaluate the same event from entirely different perspectives and reach entirely different conclusions - sometimes simply for the purpose of being able to publish additional research papers - after all, there is a limited amount of history to interpret.

    --CTH

    --

    --Got Lists? | Top 95 Star Wars Line
  124. False by Overd0g · · Score: 1

    Of course what you've written is complete nonsense. There is no evidence of "murder".

  125. The joke that wouldn't die, resurrected by DeadMeat+(TM) · · Score: 4
    I can already almost hear the imminent rehash of an old Amish joke...

    Q: What goes, *stomp* *stomp* *stomp* *stomp* *sproi-oing* *stomp* *stomp* *stomp* *stomp*?
    A: A prehistoric drive-by shooting.

    (Yes, I know bows don't really go "sproi-oing", but it's a funnier sound effect than "fpppppt".)

    1. Re:The joke that wouldn't die, resurrected by shik0me · · Score: 1
      Wow, the Amish are on Slashdot now?

  126. Fame, I'm gonna live forever! by user+flynn · · Score: 1



    This guy got a lucky break in the cosmic scheme of things. How many people care about specific individuals from 5000 years ago?

    --
    In the distance you hear an ominous moo.
  127. isn't the ark... by simpl3x · · Score: 1

    just over the mountain somewhere?

  128. I wish by TroyFoley · · Score: 1

    They make it sound like A) He was screwing around in another tribes territory or B) He was in a full battle with another tribe. While carrying an ax and a bow with a number of arrows makes me think of a prehistoric Braveheart, being shot by an arrow from below and behind seems more like he was going after mountain goats and some guy let one loose discreetly.

    --
    After I have received the wisdom of good teaching, I will untiringly teach all people. - The Teachings of Buddha
  129. Appropriate punishment by PhipleTroenix · · Score: 1

    We must find the party responsible for this and give them life.

    --
    When VPNs are outlawed, only outlaws have VPNs.
  130. Asking for a lawsuit. by Davace · · Score: 1

    All those X-rays involved in a Computer Tomography might increase his risk of cancer.

  131. We're all human after all... by rbruels · · Score: 1

    The Ice Man. A new glimpse into humanity's ancient past. An inspiration for the future and a beacon of light in today's darkness of crime and violence.

    "...scientists discovered an arrowhead beneath the Iceman's upper left shoulder and concluded that he died in pain and bled extensively..."

    Well, never mind. :P

    --

    "All your base are belong to this file I send in order to have your advice."
  132. Statute of limitations? by erroneus · · Score: 1

    I dunno man... What the statute of limitations on a thing like this? Do you think they are still after the killer? Well, I've got a pretty good alliby anyway. I was with my girlfriend at the time... just ask her. Besides, this really smells like Microsoft may have something to do with it... what was Bill doing around 5,300 years ago?

  133. WANTED by jsse · · Score: 2

    We have a picture of the suspect. Please report to local police if you've seen him.

    Caution: the suspect is armed.

  134. Murder and the DoJ by Topgun1 · · Score: 1

    In the Washington Post tomorrow: The DoJ has set the sentencing hearing for next week in the "Iceman" murder case. In other news, MS lawyers have started legal proceedings to have themselves cyrogenically frozen until a date can be set (tenatively in 5030) to resolve the anti0trust issues. -Random

  135. hmm.. by Scoria · · Score: 1

    Somehow it's inspiring to see just how long we've been killing each other.

    Michael... Michael... Mwha.. hahaha...

    --
    Do you like German cars?
  136. Re:Another Support by astr0boy · · Score: 1
    i'm sorry, but that was lame. thank you

    -----

    --

    -----
    so i says to mable, i says

  137. 10 years to see the arrow in his back? by glrotate · · Score: 2

    What's up with that?

  138. Stone Age Water Cooler Scandal by jonese_67 · · Score: 1

    Wow! Proof positive that early Man's population had its share of evil corporate ladder climbers. This guy was probably just trying to get ahead by working some overtime and getting some name-to-face recognition by his bosses, when Og Suckup comes along and stabs him in the back, claiming to have made the limestone wheel deal himself.

    --
    - jonese (http://farmaccidentdigest.com)
  139. I know who murdered him! by Ayende+Rahien · · Score: 4

    It was Cain!
    Cain did it!

    --
    Two witches watched two watches.

    --

    --
    Two witches watched two watches.
    Which witch watched which watch?
  140. His identity is unknown but... by gmanske · · Score: 1
    He was well liked and referred to as one source who didn't want to be named as "a colourful racing identity."

    Story to follow...

  141. Awesome Article! by xeeno · · Score: 1

    I just don't see how it relates to RIAA...

  142. fffft.... "Message for you, sir." by saarbruck · · Score: 2

    What it really proves is that Monty Python's material ain't as original as we'd believed. oh well...

    --
    I am the very model of a modern major general!
  143. How do they know... by Claric · · Score: 1

    ...he was murdered. Maybe it was in battle. Claric.
    --

    --
    There's no problem that cannot be solved with a suitable amount of high explosives
  144. Self inflicted. by kalleanka2 · · Score: 1

    "Being stabbed in the back is not a recent dot.com kind of thing"

    The dot.com companies stabbed themselfs in the back.

  145. so they focus on the arrow, it musta fired itself. by cball2k · · Score: 1

    that arrow didnt build itself ,the bow didn't either, yet the focus wasn't on WHO shot him, rather they focused on what he was shot with, sounds sadly like the polititions deciding by what guns ppl got shot with, as to what guns to ban, (polititions need our pity, not our support, fire yours the next time you vote)

    --
    karma, hah...
  146. How could Spindler have missed this? by lugumbashi · · Score: 1

    Konrad Spindler must have egg on his face now. The first thing you do with a mummy is to x-ray it.

    Still in his book he does argue that the iceman had suffered from an "unknown disaster" because the iceman's quiver was clearly damaged before his death.

    Philip

  147. Evidence for a hunting accident by lugumbashi · · Score: 2

    In his 1995 book, "The Man In the Ice", Konrad Spindler described in detail the iceman's equipment including his quiver, which he shows conclusively was badly damaged BEFORE it was frozen. In particular, its strap was torn off and the lid damaged.

    The natural place to wear a quiver is slung over your back. If the iceman had fallen surely it is certainly possible that he fell on his back. Thq quiver would then be placed between his body and the ground, pushing one of the arrows through the quiver and into his scapula. This would also account for the damage to the quiver and I am surprised this possibility has not been mentioned.

    The iceman also has serial rib fractures on one side - it is not possible to tell if this happened pre-mortem or not, but he does say that serial rib fractures are common in falls.

    Of course the fact that the arrows would be point-down in the quiver means that the arrow would probably have pushed through the bottom of the quiver.

    Of course it is not nearly as newsworthy...

    Philip

  148. Re:Pick your battles by dfalgoust · · Score: 1
    While I agree that most PBS news/politics programs lean to the left, PBS had the greatest, most truly evenhanded political debate show on television: William F. Buckley's "Firing Line." While Buckley is an unabashed conservative, Firing Line invited serious-minded people of all political stripes (unlike the hack guests on MSNBC, etc.) and engaged them in real discussions instead of sound-bite fests.

    Firing Line was cancelled last year owing to Buckley's advanced age and declining health after well over thirty years on-air. It will be sorely missed.

  149. And in related news.... by The+Milky+Bar+Kid · · Score: 1

    US Family Groups have claimed that the murder was incited by violence depicted in cave paintings and oral legends, and are thus lobbying for the ban of all cave paintings depicting hunting or other violence. A suit is also being prepared against the whittlers of the bow and arrow.

    --
    This post is about truth, beauty, freedom, and above all things, Karma.
    --
    -- This post is about truth, beauty, freedom, and above all things, Karma
  150. OMG! by stew77 · · Score: 1

    Oh my god! They killed Ötzi! You bastards!

    --

  151. Thanks, guys! by eekDude · · Score: 1

    What? The iceman was murdered by an arrow in the back?!? Thanks for the spoiler warning!!!! ;-)

  152. The power of ice. by bsquizzato · · Score: 1

    "They said the body was in such good condition that pores in the skin looked normal, and even the eyeballs were preserved behind lids frozen open. A sample taken from his intestine last year led scientists to conclude that his last meal included meat -- likely an alpine goat, whose bones were found nearby -- wheat, plants and plums."

    It's just amazing how preserved this man was from the freezing temperatures of the Alps. That iceman looked better than some of those egyptian mummies you see on the Discovery Channel. ;)

  153. Condit claims he never knew him ... by beanerspace · · Score: 2

    Washington D.C. - Shortly after an interview with Italian authorities, congressman Gary Condit held a press conference in which he flatly denied any knowledge of the iceman, his whereabouts or who may have wacked him in the back with an arrow.

  154. Cocoa Pebbles: "Barney Fakes His Death" by circletimessquare · · Score: 3

    Barney: Hey Fred!
    Fred: What?!
    Barney: Give me your Cocoa Pebbles!
    Fred: No!
    Barney: No? Ohhhhhh, Freeeeeed!
    (barney gets hit by an arrow in the back)
    Fred: Barney!
    (a light appears behind Fred)
    Barney: Yes, Fred?
    Fred: You...you're an angel!
    Barney: Your selfishness sent me to the great beyond.
    (we see birds holding Barney on ropes and holding a flashlight over him)
    Fred: Forgive me! Have my Cocoa Pebbles! Have them all!
    Barney: Heavenly! Chocolatiest cereal in Bedrock!
    (birds lick their lips and let go of the ropes)
    Fred: Barney! You're no angel!
    (Barney plummets into a glacier)
    Barney: The devil made me do it!

    thanks to

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  155. Was he British? by 6EQUJ5 · · Score: 2


    And his last words were...

    "Run away! Run away! Run away!"



    (yes, that's Monty Python for all you jocks who don't get it.)

    --

  156. Oh my god, they killed the Iceman by VampireByte · · Score: 1

    Those Bastards!

    --

    Run and catch, run and catch, the lamb is caught in the blackberry patch.

  157. Obviously... by No+Tears+In+The+End · · Score: 3

    we need to enact bow control and full arrow registration.

    Another sensless walk-by arrowing.

    --

    -You can cry, but you'll still die. There'll be no tears in the end.
  158. Evidence that the first Swiss Army Knife ... by pyramid+termite · · Score: 1

    ... a combination of a boomerang and an arrow, wasn't such a hot idea.

  159. Re:Austria by trampel · · Score: 1

    Yeah, soon Slashdot will refer to Las Vegas as "a village close to California" ...

  160. Hit from below by jobugeek · · Score: 1
    I saw a picture of this guy somewhere else and he isn't very tall. How did he get hit from someone shorter than him?

    "Hey, what is that midget doing with that arrow, OW........."

    --
    I'm not drunk, I just have a speech impediment. And a stomach virus. And an inner ear infection.
    1. Re:Hit from below by buhdabuddy · · Score: 1

      AHHHH!!!! I am a freak of nature!

      --
      Don't Upset the Buhda
  161. actual cause of death? by estes_grover · · Score: 5

    I thought a glacier snuck up on the iceman while he was sleeping.

  162. He was called �tzi by Hank+Powers · · Score: 1

    The iceman is Ötzi, not Otzi like the article says.

    --
    hapo
  163. Re:Pick your battles by mimbleton · · Score: 1

    The funny thing is that they ARE fair and balanced.

  164. Re:Pick your battles by mimbleton · · Score: 1

    "PBS does this all the time"

    Not even close.
    PBS programs are very interesting as long as they stay away from politics or social issues.
    As soon as they get into politics their liberal leaning is very visible.
    Scouts and gays ? Hell of course scouts were guilty as hell.
    Kyoto ? Of course US is wrong.
    Religion, of course it has no place in schools.
    Etc etc ... very predictable.

  165. The worlds first door to door salesman by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

    He was the earliest door to door salesman, carrying his sample pack. Interrupted someones dinner, and thwack, problem solved for several thousand years. Now, if arrows would work through a phone line...

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  166. Re:you can bet a nigger did it by nyc2sfo · · Score: 1

    What kind of institution let a moron, who would make a coment like this out? get a hobby pal, you r hmot is not very good...