It's 2016.. If your in any way affected by SSLv2 + export ciphers and you still feel compelled to blame it on the TLS stack - please do everyone a favor and find a new line of work.
Fuck you. My employer's IoT trash cans are not flashable, and all of my skills are janitorial in nature. That's like telling a cancer patient to find another lung.
YouTube red just took the creators hostage. I don't know how exclusive the agreement is, but if anyone depended on yt as a medium they got raped. And lots of great people are on YouTube.
You need the kind of generational change that killed MySpace and geocities and dialup. Real big shit, not just a capable adversary.
Beta test seems like something you do to the OS. Then when preview builds come out you test compatibility. Anyone integration testing on beta is really too far ahead in the cycle
I hate that stupid ass thieving magpie looking mutha fucka. Cracka ass cracka being all "Got yo nose, and ssn," can't buy threads just a busted ass gym rat costume like its national "Dress like you ain't a bitch" day all day erry day.
Fuckin white people. Prolly got a back yard full o maypoles and Santa marias and a Japanese stone garden made of little chunks of the Plymouth rock.
Duh, goatse guy doesn't have a mailing address, he has a PO box. In his ass.
You can mail him, but you can't female him.
He's not hiding out, his ass is everywhere.
Last time someone said, "Up yours," he said, "You'll need at least two."
And if A.I. ever needs to be put down, and a paradox fails, "Where is goatse guy" should give you a few days to escape while a computer tries to figure out "Wtf is this," "I can't even," and finally, "How many jelly bellies worth of excavated arsehole is that, approximately?"
This could be done without the owner's consent, and shipped to everyone. Apple does not want to do that at all costs. And you could disable auto-updates, knowing that a device without updates is not secure. So you would be pwned either way, likely.
The FBI is willing to allow Apple to send an update to this specific phone, in an Apple lab, while Apple retains custody of the phone, as long as the data on the phone can be copied and given to the FBI.
In this case, the owner cannot consent and the phone is prosecutorial evidence, so the owner need not consent. And if a warrant were issued to compel Apple to send out an *existing* backdoor to gather evidence, Apple might have no choice but comply, with a probable gag order so the user is not notified.
Ergo, Apple wants to avoid creating this backdoor in the first place, so they can legit claim it doesn't exist for future requests.
The fun part of this is that the prosecution is willing to burn this bridge, and encourage Apple to redesign the security so this can't happen in the future. Capturing an Apple master signing key wouldn't be enough to make a backdoor this way, if Apple succeeds. Knowing in advance that the evidence would probably not help makes it head-scratching that they would go so far to basically declare in public what their capability is for reclaiming encrypted data.
Now everyone knows:
1) Disabling cloud sync means the data is on the device only 2) Apple currently won't make a backdoor 3) Feds don't have a backdoor 4) Future phones will likely not even be able to be backdoored
This is very much Snowden level releasing of national security secrets to enemies, only it's being done in public for no gain. Which makes it really fishy, unless some prosecutor really believed that this request would result in no change in technology nor blowback from the tech world. Which is the opposite claimed by everything about the Snowden files, so he can't claim ignorance. Given that the tech world moved to encryption because of Snowden's revelations as well as intrusions and data dumps, that's exceedingly bizarre.
I love pointing out how parrothead fanbois oversell quality and security, but this is a straight up troll. With 2 upmods, it also guarantees replies and page views.
Bravo AC for hooking bites, and shame on the respondents for biting.
For fuck's sake, the last two sentences address this. They have software that successfully trained on a corpus of fiction. They need reliable non fiction (not dramatized memoirs or other horseshit), and a lot of it.
Now, try again. And leave chess out of it or I'll have to mansplain why that makes no sense.
You summarized two different arguments. One is about not having enough people at all, foreign or not. The other is the real problem, taking advantage of the system to lower wages.
The first problem will lower wages, but the second has lower wages as the only goal, above continuity and quality.
Your post just makes all h1b opponents look like frothing retards. You're not helping.
"This is the first I've heard of it" really paints you as an outlier, not qualified to comment on how its absence from your self selected news aggregators indicates its severity.
I avoid current news actively, barring things like leaving a room or business to accomplish avoidance. And I've heard as much as the summary has to offer, at least.
You're a dolt. Any of the posts with comparison or context far surpasses your profession of ignorance. I invite you to indulge your bent towards autosexual nymphomania. Privately.
Not sure that's the best legal advice, but you should include a reference to the number of hours you spent, classified as either R & D or volunteer hours. Business loves that shit.
Not released means it isn't volunteer time, but RnD could be tax benefits.
This has been covered elsewhere, and never with so much horseshit bias. No editorialization should be needed for news, which is why no one likes Bennet Hasslehoff either.
Didn't we reject this nonsense about the time Glenn Beck refused to deny raping and murdering that girl?
Thinking in percentages does not help. And, your math is wrong. It works that way for inflation overall because business chooses to keep wages stagnant. But the poors having money means it gets spent, with a multiplier effect which decreases the 1 for 1 inflation hikes.
Knock and announce is a state law, and the lead officer has a policy that is unconstitutional, due to having been shot at, with no legal exception for safety other than exigent circumstance.
And, evidence that would be found anyway is NOT A LEGAL CONCEPT. That's why an exclusionary rule exists. You can't find evidence one way and say it would have been found anyway.
Complicating the argument, the door was unlocked. No force was needed. This should have been the basis of rejecting the suit all the way up the chain, IMO.
Your legal takedown is nonsense and wrong, even if I reach the same conclusion. Which Scalia did a lot, reaching the conclusion the wrong way. What hurts is that the reasoning goes in the record, and justices tend to respect prior thinking until it becomes obviously outdated.
Clearly we can't have a conversation about nuance and context, so I'll stop trying.
780.656 Service of warrant; officer's authorization to use force. Sec. 6.
The officer to whom a warrant is directed, or any person assisting him, may break any outer or inner door or window of a house or building, or anything therein, in order to execute the warrant, if, after notice of his authority and purpose, he is refused admittance, or when necessary to liberate himself or any person assisting him in execution of the warrant.
Ggp was in context of W10 being the most expensive free upgrade ever, and it presumes possession of the Windows 7 license. So your comment is bogus on its face.
For both you and your sibling, normally W10 would have cost money as an upgrade, and it doesn't. If you had to do the math, what would it be? Not the cost of the original W7 license alone, and not the list price.
I contend that you paid for the work done to make 7 and you don't pay for the work for 10. Using them simultaneously is NOT the same thing, so invalidating your right to use 7, when you have used it for years, does not somehow mean you paid zero dollars to not use it.
I could go on, but the two of you seem great at choosing one thing to illogically disagree with and miss the point, so I'll give you no more rope to hang yourself with.
Halve that amount, since you buy one OS, get one free. Also, since most users got an OEM licence at a discount, you can take another third off. You're left with dinner for two, tops, in the countries where Microsoft makes a profit. Not where profit is counted, of course.
Feel free to revise your rant accordingly, or at your discretion be an ignorant ass.
The DoD says DoD puters have to have EE and set telemetry to its lowest setting (EE only), so I am comfortable with it.
iase.disa.mil and search under operating systems.
Personally, I'm going to avoid win 10 until I can't, then run ReactOS. And anything that doesn't work in ReactOS will get a bug report and a simple example program. A simple main.c showing the problem gets good results, I have found.
I'm waiting for the class action suit based on replacement costs for hardware without Win 10 drivers. Almost any hardware bought before the w10 developer preview wilL be out of warranty. Lots supported, sure, but most not.
One update you didn't ask for and your hardware is bricked. It's going to be glorious.
Where the hell did Beta go? Everyone here seemed on board and then whoosh, nothing. Like a giant vacuum where no one can hear you compliment the web 3.0 interface. It's a wasted opportunity.
It is good news, regardless of whether it is better. A business took over a free site and fucked it up, now a business gets to learn anew how nit to fuck it up. They have financial incentives to ignore the fuckery of dashslot.
Or, give up and go to soylent news. I insult fucktards here, k only read there. If you think I'm some sort of overzealous tyrannical dicksmooch, you won't me posting there. Until fucktards register there, so don't be a fucktard while posting.
Oh, you fixed it. I don't have time to be outraged about this. Get a citizens united corporate backing and fight, otherwise fuck off Bennett hassleton.
I didn't ask why I should care, I know that. I just don't have time to do more than ask if anonymous helpless cares more than just preach to the choir.
Slashdot Mirror
Fuck you. My employer's IoT trash cans are not flashable, and all of my skills are janitorial in nature. That's like telling a cancer patient to find another lung.
YouTube red just took the creators hostage. I don't know how exclusive the agreement is, but if anyone depended on yt as a medium they got raped. And lots of great people are on YouTube.
You need the kind of generational change that killed MySpace and geocities and dialup. Real big shit, not just a capable adversary.
It wouldn't have taken so long if they focused on splitting yo mommas legs instead.
Pow! Chair to the face!
Beta test seems like something you do to the OS. Then when preview builds come out you test compatibility. Anyone integration testing on beta is really too far ahead in the cycle
I hate that stupid ass thieving magpie looking mutha fucka. Cracka ass cracka being all "Got yo nose, and ssn," can't buy threads just a busted ass gym rat costume like its national "Dress like you ain't a bitch" day all day erry day.
Fuckin white people. Prolly got a back yard full o maypoles and Santa marias and a Japanese stone garden made of little chunks of the Plymouth rock.
Duh, goatse guy doesn't have a mailing address, he has a PO box. In his ass.
You can mail him, but you can't female him.
He's not hiding out, his ass is everywhere.
Last time someone said, "Up yours," he said, "You'll need at least two."
And if A.I. ever needs to be put down, and a paradox fails, "Where is goatse guy" should give you a few days to escape while a computer tries to figure out "Wtf is this," "I can't even," and finally, "How many jelly bellies worth of excavated arsehole is that, approximately?"
This could be done without the owner's consent, and shipped to everyone. Apple does not want to do that at all costs. And you could disable auto-updates, knowing that a device without updates is not secure. So you would be pwned either way, likely.
The FBI is willing to allow Apple to send an update to this specific phone, in an Apple lab, while Apple retains custody of the phone, as long as the data on the phone can be copied and given to the FBI.
In this case, the owner cannot consent and the phone is prosecutorial evidence, so the owner need not consent. And if a warrant were issued to compel Apple to send out an *existing* backdoor to gather evidence, Apple might have no choice but comply, with a probable gag order so the user is not notified.
Ergo, Apple wants to avoid creating this backdoor in the first place, so they can legit claim it doesn't exist for future requests.
The fun part of this is that the prosecution is willing to burn this bridge, and encourage Apple to redesign the security so this can't happen in the future. Capturing an Apple master signing key wouldn't be enough to make a backdoor this way, if Apple succeeds. Knowing in advance that the evidence would probably not help makes it head-scratching that they would go so far to basically declare in public what their capability is for reclaiming encrypted data.
Now everyone knows:
1) Disabling cloud sync means the data is on the device only
2) Apple currently won't make a backdoor
3) Feds don't have a backdoor
4) Future phones will likely not even be able to be backdoored
This is very much Snowden level releasing of national security secrets to enemies, only it's being done in public for no gain. Which makes it really fishy, unless some prosecutor really believed that this request would result in no change in technology nor blowback from the tech world. Which is the opposite claimed by everything about the Snowden files, so he can't claim ignorance. Given that the tech world moved to encryption because of Snowden's revelations as well as intrusions and data dumps, that's exceedingly bizarre.
I love pointing out how parrothead fanbois oversell quality and security, but this is a straight up troll. With 2 upmods, it also guarantees replies and page views.
Bravo AC for hooking bites, and shame on the respondents for biting.
For fuck's sake, the last two sentences address this. They have software that successfully trained on a corpus of fiction. They need reliable non fiction (not dramatized memoirs or other horseshit), and a lot of it.
Now, try again. And leave chess out of it or I'll have to mansplain why that makes no sense.
You summarized two different arguments. One is about not having enough people at all, foreign or not. The other is the real problem, taking advantage of the system to lower wages.
The first problem will lower wages, but the second has lower wages as the only goal, above continuity and quality.
Your post just makes all h1b opponents look like frothing retards. You're not helping.
"This is the first I've heard of it" really paints you as an outlier, not qualified to comment on how its absence from your self selected news aggregators indicates its severity.
I avoid current news actively, barring things like leaving a room or business to accomplish avoidance. And I've heard as much as the summary has to offer, at least.
You're a dolt. Any of the posts with comparison or context far surpasses your profession of ignorance. I invite you to indulge your bent towards autosexual nymphomania. Privately.
Not sure that's the best legal advice, but you should include a reference to the number of hours you spent, classified as either R & D or volunteer hours. Business loves that shit.
Not released means it isn't volunteer time, but RnD could be tax benefits.
This has been covered elsewhere, and never with so much horseshit bias. No editorialization should be needed for news, which is why no one likes Bennet Hasslehoff either.
Didn't we reject this nonsense about the time Glenn Beck refused to deny raping and murdering that girl?
Thinking in percentages does not help. And, your math is wrong. It works that way for inflation overall because business chooses to keep wages stagnant. But the poors having money means it gets spent, with a multiplier effect which decreases the 1 for 1 inflation hikes.
Knock and announce is a state law, and the lead officer has a policy that is unconstitutional, due to having been shot at, with no legal exception for safety other than exigent circumstance.
And, evidence that would be found anyway is NOT A LEGAL CONCEPT. That's why an exclusionary rule exists. You can't find evidence one way and say it would have been found anyway.
Complicating the argument, the door was unlocked. No force was needed. This should have been the basis of rejecting the suit all the way up the chain, IMO.
Your legal takedown is nonsense and wrong, even if I reach the same conclusion. Which Scalia did a lot, reaching the conclusion the wrong way. What hurts is that the reasoning goes in the record, and justices tend to respect prior thinking until it becomes obviously outdated.
Clearly we can't have a conversation about nuance and context, so I'll stop trying.
780.656 Service of warrant; officer's authorization to use force.
Sec. 6.
The officer to whom a warrant is directed, or any person assisting him, may break any outer or inner door or window of a house or building, or anything therein, in order to execute the warrant, if, after notice of his authority and purpose, he is refused admittance, or when necessary to liberate himself or any person assisting him in execution of the warrant.
History: 1966, Act 189, Eff. Mar. 10, 1967
Ggp was in context of W10 being the most expensive free upgrade ever, and it presumes possession of the Windows 7 license. So your comment is bogus on its face.
For both you and your sibling, normally W10 would have cost money as an upgrade, and it doesn't. If you had to do the math, what would it be? Not the cost of the original W7 license alone, and not the list price.
I contend that you paid for the work done to make 7 and you don't pay for the work for 10. Using them simultaneously is NOT the same thing, so invalidating your right to use 7, when you have used it for years, does not somehow mean you paid zero dollars to not use it.
I could go on, but the two of you seem great at choosing one thing to illogically disagree with and miss the point, so I'll give you no more rope to hang yourself with.
Halve that amount, since you buy one OS, get one free. Also, since most users got an OEM licence at a discount, you can take another third off. You're left with dinner for two, tops, in the countries where Microsoft makes a profit. Not where profit is counted, of course.
Feel free to revise your rant accordingly, or at your discretion be an ignorant ass.
The DoD says DoD puters have to have EE and set telemetry to its lowest setting (EE only), so I am comfortable with it.
iase.disa.mil and search under operating systems.
Personally, I'm going to avoid win 10 until I can't, then run ReactOS. And anything that doesn't work in ReactOS will get a bug report and a simple example program. A simple main.c showing the problem gets good results, I have found.
Can't wait until the DoD moves forward with Windows 10 and defense contractors have to disable this telemetry reporting.
There will be a way, at that point, or there will be problems.
I'm waiting for the class action suit based on replacement costs for hardware without Win 10 drivers. Almost any hardware bought before the w10 developer preview wilL be out of warranty. Lots supported, sure, but most not.
One update you didn't ask for and your hardware is bricked. It's going to be glorious.
Where the hell did Beta go? Everyone here seemed on board and then whoosh, nothing. Like a giant vacuum where no one can hear you compliment the web 3.0 interface. It's a wasted opportunity.
How do you catch 30 million unique rabbits?
PAY CMDRTACO 100 KILODOLLARS AND UNIQUE UP ON THEM.
It is good news, regardless of whether it is better. A business took over a free site and fucked it up, now a business gets to learn anew how nit to fuck it up. They have financial incentives to ignore the fuckery of dashslot.
Or, give up and go to soylent news. I insult fucktards here, k only read there. If you think I'm some sort of overzealous tyrannical dicksmooch, you won't me posting there. Until fucktards register there, so don't be a fucktard while posting.
Also, fuck you autocorrect.
Is he better than rust, ruby, python, or c++?
"On Windows 7, it worked immediately."
Oh, you fixed it. I don't have time to be outraged about this. Get a citizens united corporate backing and fight, otherwise fuck off Bennett hassleton.
I didn't ask why I should care, I know that. I just don't have time to do more than ask if anonymous helpless cares more than just preach to the choir.