Oh yeah, and my wife noticed that Oliver Queen's beard stubble sometimes changes length
I'm pretty sure that doesn't happen. I've only seen a bit of that show, but a lie detector would show that I'm not lying. Aside from questionable accuracy, the lie detector would suggest that your wife is probably either more or less attuned to the visual radiation emitted by your display. Eyeballs are not created equal, nor are visual processing sections of the brain, after all. Try changing the display temperature, and if that doesn't work, you might consider waxing your balls. If you are female and have no balls, seek a divorce attorney.
I have 5 mod points because some idiot apparently agrees with my blatantly brash style, so I'll give you an unrelated nod for the info.
I'd mod you up, but your link apparently requires JavaScript. So no ups for you. Also, no ups for most of everyone, ever.
Google and Facebook have been effective in getting everything from everyone, ever, but I don't see any trend like you suggest other than this immediate, or in other words not trend-like, Windows 10.
Sauce or GTFO. I vote for "recent and incompetent" rather than "habitual".
Normally I might feel the need to berate you for not answering the question of how, because any number of searches would have returned "continuity" and related terms.
So, while I still had the thought, I feel enlightened (though I knew 2/3 of what you wrote, there's always more to know)
I always wondered how, but assumed that everyone has their own system, most will say notebooks or index cards, and some reference to OneNote and similar. Never thought asking here would return actual how.
Ad blocking does not mean the necessary implementation details are in place. Proof needs to be a careful reading of Chrome documentation, compared with Noscript functionality. It seems to me that you are simply wrong.
Less simply, if Mozilla plans to extend the API to allow noscript, I believe that the current API does not allow for it to work.
I'm pretty sure most dashslot readers have not even been accused of "molesting five children, including his own sisters", become addicted to pornography, AND been unfaithful to their spouse and parent of their children.
I've managed to avoid all of that, and I imagine that most here have managed to avoid most of that.
"The last few years, while publicly stating I was fighting against immorality in our country, I was hiding my own personal failings.
That's basically the reason that we can't have an honest conversation about these things. Social norms are apparently perpetuated by the people least interested in preserving them, under some sort of pretense that they feel they need to show, due to those norms.
The very people who most want or need to change society feel compelled to vocally oppose that change. It was easy when we could point to race or gender as being obviously different, but you can't get a gay Republican to say "I'm gay, and you guys like me, so let's just drop it." Okay, maybe 3.
Can you get someone to stand up and say "I think it's normal to molest children, so let's just decriminalize it"? No, and it's really unlikely to happen for a lot of reasons unrelated to culture. But acceptance of infidelity and homosexuality is culture specific.
Let's ridicule everyone who professes one life and lives another, because they should have done more to stand up for their true beliefs. Not just for themselves, but for everyone like them.
That's so much more like the Golden Rule, and the Jesus part of the Bible, as opposed to the Angry God part of the Bible, which Jesus specifically waved aside in several specific areas, your example being one.
"Do unto others" does not mean "persecute those who actually follow the lifestyle you want to have".
Really, is it that difficult for people to be fucking honest with their life partner, and just tell them that they want to sleep with somebody else?
Yes. It is. Apprently you haven't heard of "culture", which is a set of things that people do, and don't do, to each other.
Many people violate this, but it is really hard to do so, or you have to not care.
I really don't think you understand much about marriage, especially 10 years in, and you really don't understand how difficult counter-culture is. You probably want to reply "really easy". Then just try shitting in a busy street, seducing your boss's daughter/wife (especially if you're female), or admit that you're gay when you're really just an average Family Values politician.
Yes, these things are hard. I do have sympathy, but I hope this opens up a conversation that leads to social acceptance so that we can say "I'm not tired of fucking you, I just want to fuck someone else this weekend."
Having said my piece, some people do have open relationships and open marriages. I assume it's easy to exclude someone like that if you're not into that sort of thing when it first comes up. And if you're into it, it's easier to marry someone you're not that sexually into. But it's not part of the culture in almost every place, so until it is, it remains difficult to say that this thing that you agreed not to do is something you want to do.
You need medication. Or counseling. Or better yet, both.
how did someone find Josh Duggar in there so quickly?
"The wedding episode of âoe19 Kids and Countingâ racked up 4.4 million total viewers and posted a 3.5 household rating" - and every news rag on TV, magazines, and vlog wannabes are constantly on the lookout for tips on celebrities.
Ever watch TMZ? It's on OTA TV, so sometimes I turn on the TV when it's on. They spend a lot of time looking for info. And when the next data dump hits, they will be searching through every file for names currently on their big hitters list, and then looking for anything they can turn in to news.
Are you really not aware of how many people make it their business to know anything about anyone famous?
That's why Dice may soon sell Slashdot, failure to monetize, and this story is an attempt to capitalize on as much market share before the sale goes through.
Pensions are low risk, low return. One third of Yale's money was in a high risk, high return fund. Don't know about the other two thirds, they may have been in something like your link. The author didn't seem to care to find out.
But which ETF do you choose? It's easy for you in hindsight, but the great fund managers do a great job choosing where the money goes, and when to move it.
A typical investment would net around 5% to 10% over time, making the manager 1 to 2%. That's not exorbitant. As you said, in a good year the.numbers get bigger.
And the article was rubbish, cherry picking data to serve an agenda.
This is really the same old story about how fund managers take every advantage they can, to mutual benefit, but don't suffer in a downward economy. Income is taxed as capital gains, fees even when losing money, etc.
Fuck Slashdot, I'm taking my eyeballs and clicks to an aggregator that provides a way to learn more about something if I'm interested. Like this new hyperlink thing I've been hearing about.
The last work posted there by Nicholas Nethercote was December 11, 2014 - hardly a bygone era. He basically stopped posting about every little find around 2012, but kept making improvements to memory analysis tools used to improved Firefox. I'm sure you'll read a few sentences and tell me I'm an idiot so
November 4, 2014 by Nicholas Nethercote| 23 Comments If you record every heap allocation and re-allocation done by Firefox you find some interesting things. In particular, you find some sub-optimal buffer growth strategies that cause a lot of heap churn.
You have to stop minimizing the negative impact of bad memory management to be taken seriously by anyone who noticed it for YEARS and was being ignored.
Back on topic, Firefox now has too much money. Instead of paying people to keep the lights on (fix security and implement new standards) they are now adding features that most people don't want or need. Improved privacy, with a built in blocklist, is finally something that people want.
we should instead promote it as the better browser. FF will regain market share the same way it lost it.
Finally, you're really mistaken. Back then, there was a "better browser", because "browsing" was a thing. Now, there are so many different ways of interacting, and each web browser excels in one way or another for a particular pattern. I use FireFox because of the plug-ins, but no one that I would recommend a browser to needs that. I don't see a way for Firefox to come back at this point without something unique and generally popular - and it seems like they are banking on privacy. especially because Google isn't the prime funding source.
Problem is, they are going to have to make privacy mode as near a default as they can get away with, or it won't be worth switching for most people. And that's unlikely.
If I have to change some obscure setting to make one of the most recognized open source projects not shit my information all over the internet, then what is the point of open source?
RMS was right. Fuck all of you in betweeners.
Either you buy Windows 10 enabled shite, or you read the code.
Otherwise, don't even begin to tell me that something that assjack1745 committed to github is more secure than anything you can comprehend. Because unless you read it, it's not secure.
I'm posting from 2 day old FireFox. Might as well not trust that it's me.
And before you say it's better than proprietary shit where you can't read the code, I change proprietary shit once a month at the very least. And I'll be a monkey's buttplug if I can make sense of the FireFox build process.
It's a hell of a lot easier to make changes in binaries at this point in time. And yes, I mean disassembling and inserting jumps to random locations that used to hold NOPs and back.
At least I understand what a binary is doing. Source usually has too many #ifdef or similar to even try to make sense of it.
Make sure you've read and understood the whole comment before replying.
I read "Targeting" as an allusion to weapons - taking aim with a firearm or dropped munitions.
At kids? What the shit is your problem? Do you misunderstand basic things like metaphors or allusions? I guess not, because you used the word "allusion" already.
So you take target to mean "very bad"?
Netflix, and everyone else ever, want kids to watch. Not someone else's channel, but their own channel. HBO, Netflix, and Amazon are in this whole thing, actively.
Targeting being a bad thing? Yes, it really is, same as putting them in the cross hairs of some lethal thing. But just kinda tangentially related.
So now you're correcting people from adopting your own biases and assumptions? Is that helpful?
No. Translation: People who have been doing the exact same job for months, if not years, are not happy when inexperienced idiots get paid more.
Some workers also said they suspect their hours are being cut and annual raises reduced to cover the cost of the wage increase for newer workers. s. Along with bumping up the minimum wage, it increased the amount workers receive when promoted, boosted pay for some managers and raised the maximum pay for all hourly positions.
If my hours were cut, I'd feel that. If the corporate response were "Wal-Mart denies that and says itâ(TM)s taking steps to ensure all employees have an opportunity to move into higher-paying jobs" I'd object. Not just because of grammar.
And, because reading comprehension is beyond your grade level, go fuck yourself with a fiery cactus. I assume these words mean things to you, and that you can execute them as directed.
While I disagreed with you earlier, I think you should have pointed out " a well-intentioned though economically irrational policy change that few Democrats realize has a troubling racial history."
Who cares if it has a racial history, and who the fuck of all fucks of a person who could give a fuck if that had something to do with "the Canadian province of British Columbia, with the intent and effect of pricing Japanese immigrants out of jobs in the lumbering industry." Actual Question Mark.
Carrie Sheffield is functionally retarded. And I mean that in the most positive of terms, meaning that he/she can earn a salary by not having to defend one word that he/she has ever written. Or maybe that makes the rest of us retarded.
I'm starting to feel like I missed a calling, and there is no need for the countless plebeians who agree to sound off because fuck all of you in the eyeballs.
"Paid Not Being A Slave Wage" is a really good term for minimum wage, but it has its triggers.
For the record, I believe in the difference between a minimum wage and a living wage. They are distinct.
The standard seems to be quitting your job for a better offer, leaving on good terms, then coming back. You have the experience, can answer the interview questions correctly, get past the HR filter easier, and can negotiate a higher salary.
People who don't know this get screwed hard. But how do some people know this and others do not?
This is actually a question directly for you, drinkypoo (153816)
I would say that laie_techie (883464) is not "playing the game". And I admit that's a ridiculous thing to do, but if you decide to be otherwise-employed rather than self-employed, then you decide to play the game by those rules. And if you play the game by coming to work and accepting the meager raise you are offered, then you are playing a terrible game.
I left my job for a raise in the area of $15k to $20k to be general. My management chain would have kept me for more. But I left, making it clear that a raise, plus back pay, was the only way to keep me.
One person out of probably 60 or more got an immediate raise because of that. Not me, the guy who still worked there.
And finally, 25% of a lot more is better than 40% of minimum wage.
Did you read The Fountainhead first? Because that is much better written, and really describes the struggle which is the basis of Atlas. After reading The Fountainhead, Atlas Shrugged makes a lot more sense.
It's preachy, and I don't agree with it necessarily, but I understand the point. And I was able to follow the story until the 50 page manifesto at the end. Which I read, but Jesus Christmas just write a manifesto if a single character's speech goes beyond 5 pages.
If you hate The Fountainhead, then just wikipedia the philosophy and consider yourself enlightened.
I actually missed some of the characters, and felt cheated that Atlas wasn't better constructed, considering all of the praise (probably by people who had only heard of it).
No. He once ran a company that attempted to push the boundaries of anti-competitive behavior, but that wasn't evil.
If you don't follow, remember that in American law, anything that is not explicitly forbidden is allowed. And the only way to know if something is forbidden is to :
1) Do it 2) Be challenged (a) by someone who can show harm 3) Have it upheld by the Supreme Court
Anything else means it's legal, or legal in some part of the country, or technically legal while violating the spirit of the law.
I remember when Bill Gates was evil, but I was ignorant then. I have since learned the law, the constitution, and relevant ancillary information.
Challenge for you: Sadeep Napreeka (based on memory, not intended to be an insult) runs the company now, and Windows 10 kinda seems like a privacy nightmare. Comparatively, billg seems tame.
So if someone should down mod you, it seems natural and fair. Up mod seems kinda shill reinforcing shill.
Or maybe someone does not understand America.
Nothing is illegal. Oh, yeah, that should be. Oh and that, and maybe that recent thing. Oh, and let's add that to the list.
America has allowed numerous terrible behaviours, until they demonstrated social harm.
Slashdot Mirror
Buy low, sell high. And if your employer sucks, take less money for a more balanced job.
Can't do it? Re-evaluate.
I work 40 hrs max, and the general expectation is no more than 50.
Relocate might also apply.
I'm pretty sure that doesn't happen. I've only seen a bit of that show, but a lie detector would show that I'm not lying. Aside from questionable accuracy, the lie detector would suggest that your wife is probably either more or less attuned to the visual radiation emitted by your display. Eyeballs are not created equal, nor are visual processing sections of the brain, after all. Try changing the display temperature, and if that doesn't work, you might consider waxing your balls. If you are female and have no balls, seek a divorce attorney.
I have 5 mod points because some idiot apparently agrees with my blatantly brash style, so I'll give you an unrelated nod for the info.
Also, Dice eats balls. CTRL+F vint - no matches.
I can't tell if samzenpus is the idiot, or submitter, but either way someone needs to die in a fire. Fires are deadly, but slow. And well deserved.
I have mod points, but you are an idiot. Because this.
So enjoy your moment of being an anonymously retarded fool +1, it will soon end.
And audited every line of code yourself. Because this happened: 23-Year-Old X11 Server Security Vulnerability Discovered
Corollary: Do not trust an operating system you have sources for.
Apparently, just do not trust.
I'd mod you up, but your link apparently requires JavaScript. So no ups for you. Also, no ups for most of everyone, ever.
Google and Facebook have been effective in getting everything from everyone, ever, but I don't see any trend like you suggest other than this immediate, or in other words not trend-like, Windows 10.
Sauce or GTFO. I vote for "recent and incompetent" rather than "habitual".
N=1, for a study of earth-like earths. I answered your question. You were not specific. Apparently your science is the only science?
Normally I might feel the need to berate you for not answering the question of how, because any number of searches would have returned "continuity" and related terms.
So, while I still had the thought, I feel enlightened (though I knew 2/3 of what you wrote, there's always more to know)
I always wondered how, but assumed that everyone has their own system, most will say notebooks or index cards, and some reference to OneNote and similar. Never thought asking here would return actual how.
Ad blocking does not mean the necessary implementation details are in place. Proof needs to be a careful reading of Chrome documentation, compared with Noscript functionality. It seems to me that you are simply wrong.
Less simply, if Mozilla plans to extend the API to allow noscript, I believe that the current API does not allow for it to work.
I'm pretty sure most dashslot readers have not even been accused of "molesting five children, including his own sisters", become addicted to pornography, AND been unfaithful to their spouse and parent of their children.
I've managed to avoid all of that, and I imagine that most here have managed to avoid most of that.
That's basically the reason that we can't have an honest conversation about these things. Social norms are apparently perpetuated by the people least interested in preserving them, under some sort of pretense that they feel they need to show, due to those norms.
The very people who most want or need to change society feel compelled to vocally oppose that change. It was easy when we could point to race or gender as being obviously different, but you can't get a gay Republican to say "I'm gay, and you guys like me, so let's just drop it." Okay, maybe 3.
Can you get someone to stand up and say "I think it's normal to molest children, so let's just decriminalize it"? No, and it's really unlikely to happen for a lot of reasons unrelated to culture. But acceptance of infidelity and homosexuality is culture specific.
Let's ridicule everyone who professes one life and lives another, because they should have done more to stand up for their true beliefs. Not just for themselves, but for everyone like them.
That's so much more like the Golden Rule, and the Jesus part of the Bible, as opposed to the Angry God part of the Bible, which Jesus specifically waved aside in several specific areas, your example being one.
"Do unto others" does not mean "persecute those who actually follow the lifestyle you want to have".
Yes. It is. Apprently you haven't heard of "culture", which is a set of things that people do, and don't do, to each other.
Many people violate this, but it is really hard to do so, or you have to not care.
I really don't think you understand much about marriage, especially 10 years in, and you really don't understand how difficult counter-culture is. You probably want to reply "really easy". Then just try shitting in a busy street, seducing your boss's daughter/wife (especially if you're female), or admit that you're gay when you're really just an average Family Values politician.
Yes, these things are hard. I do have sympathy, but I hope this opens up a conversation that leads to social acceptance so that we can say "I'm not tired of fucking you, I just want to fuck someone else this weekend."
Having said my piece, some people do have open relationships and open marriages. I assume it's easy to exclude someone like that if you're not into that sort of thing when it first comes up. And if you're into it, it's easier to marry someone you're not that sexually into. But it's not part of the culture in almost every place, so until it is, it remains difficult to say that this thing that you agreed not to do is something you want to do.
You need medication. Or counseling. Or better yet, both.
"The wedding episode of âoe19 Kids and Countingâ racked up 4.4 million total viewers and posted a 3.5 household rating" - and every news rag on TV, magazines, and vlog wannabes are constantly on the lookout for tips on celebrities.
Ever watch TMZ? It's on OTA TV, so sometimes I turn on the TV when it's on. They spend a lot of time looking for info. And when the next data dump hits, they will be searching through every file for names currently on their big hitters list, and then looking for anything they can turn in to news.
Are you really not aware of how many people make it their business to know anything about anyone famous?
Dice's Thibault needs clicks. That's what's hard.
That's why Dice may soon sell Slashdot, failure to monetize, and this story is an attempt to capitalize on as much market share before the sale goes through.
Pensions are low risk, low return. One third of Yale's money was in a high risk, high return fund. Don't know about the other two thirds, they may have been in something like your link. The author didn't seem to care to find out.
But which ETF do you choose? It's easy for you in hindsight, but the great fund managers do a great job choosing where the money goes, and when to move it.
A typical investment would net around 5% to 10% over time, making the manager 1 to 2%. That's not exorbitant. As you said, in a good year the .numbers get bigger.
And the article was rubbish, cherry picking data to serve an agenda.
This is really the same old story about how fund managers take every advantage they can, to mutual benefit, but don't suffer in a downward economy. Income is taxed as capital gains, fees even when losing money, etc.
Fuck Slashdot, I'm taking my eyeballs and clicks to an aggregator that provides a way to learn more about something if I'm interested. Like this new hyperlink thing I've been hearing about.
Wrong
And really wrong
The last work posted there by Nicholas Nethercote was December 11, 2014 - hardly a bygone era. He basically stopped posting about every little find around 2012, but kept making improvements to memory analysis tools used to improved Firefox. I'm sure you'll read a few sentences and tell me I'm an idiot so
You have to stop minimizing the negative impact of bad memory management to be taken seriously by anyone who noticed it for YEARS and was being ignored.
Back on topic, Firefox now has too much money. Instead of paying people to keep the lights on (fix security and implement new standards) they are now adding features that most people don't want or need. Improved privacy, with a built in blocklist, is finally something that people want.
Finally, you're really mistaken. Back then, there was a "better browser", because "browsing" was a thing. Now, there are so many different ways of interacting, and each web browser excels in one way or another for a particular pattern. I use FireFox because of the plug-ins, but no one that I would recommend a browser to needs that. I don't see a way for Firefox to come back at this point without something unique and generally popular - and it seems like they are banking on privacy. especially because Google isn't the prime funding source.
Problem is, they are going to have to make privacy mode as near a default as they can get away with, or it won't be worth switching for most people. And that's unlikely.
If I have to change some obscure setting to make one of the most recognized open source projects not shit my information all over the internet, then what is the point of open source?
RMS was right. Fuck all of you in betweeners.
Either you buy Windows 10 enabled shite, or you read the code.
Otherwise, don't even begin to tell me that something that assjack1745 committed to github is more secure than anything you can comprehend. Because unless you read it, it's not secure.
I'm posting from 2 day old FireFox. Might as well not trust that it's me.
Open source, closed eyes.
And before you say it's better than proprietary shit where you can't read the code, I change proprietary shit once a month at the very least. And I'll be a monkey's buttplug if I can make sense of the FireFox build process.
It's a hell of a lot easier to make changes in binaries at this point in time. And yes, I mean disassembling and inserting jumps to random locations that used to hold NOPs and back.
At least I understand what a binary is doing. Source usually has too many #ifdef or similar to even try to make sense of it.
Make sure you've read and understood the whole comment before replying.
At kids? What the shit is your problem? Do you misunderstand basic things like metaphors or allusions? I guess not, because you used the word "allusion" already.
So you take target to mean "very bad"?
Netflix, and everyone else ever, want kids to watch. Not someone else's channel, but their own channel. HBO, Netflix, and Amazon are in this whole thing, actively.
Targeting being a bad thing? Yes, it really is, same as putting them in the cross hairs of some lethal thing. But just kinda tangentially related.
So now you're correcting people from adopting your own biases and assumptions? Is that helpful?
No. Translation: People who have been doing the exact same job for months, if not years, are not happy when inexperienced idiots get paid more.
If my hours were cut, I'd feel that. If the corporate response were "Wal-Mart denies that and says itâ(TM)s taking steps to ensure all employees have an opportunity to move into higher-paying jobs" I'd object. Not just because of grammar.
And, because reading comprehension is beyond your grade level, go fuck yourself with a fiery cactus. I assume these words mean things to you, and that you can execute them as directed.
While I disagreed with you earlier, I think you should have pointed out " a well-intentioned though economically irrational policy change that few Democrats realize has a troubling racial history."
Who cares if it has a racial history, and who the fuck of all fucks of a person who could give a fuck if that had something to do with "the Canadian province of British Columbia, with the intent and effect of pricing Japanese immigrants out of jobs in the lumbering industry." Actual Question Mark.
Carrie Sheffield is functionally retarded. And I mean that in the most positive of terms, meaning that he/she can earn a salary by not having to defend one word that he/she has ever written. Or maybe that makes the rest of us retarded.
I'm starting to feel like I missed a calling, and there is no need for the countless plebeians who agree to sound off because fuck all of you in the eyeballs.
"Paid Not Being A Slave Wage" is a really good term for minimum wage, but it has its triggers.
For the record, I believe in the difference between a minimum wage and a living wage. They are distinct.
The standard seems to be quitting your job for a better offer, leaving on good terms, then coming back. You have the experience, can answer the interview questions correctly, get past the HR filter easier, and can negotiate a higher salary.
People who don't know this get screwed hard. But how do some people know this and others do not?
This is actually a question directly for you, drinkypoo (153816)
I would say that laie_techie (883464) is not "playing the game". And I admit that's a ridiculous thing to do, but if you decide to be otherwise-employed rather than self-employed, then you decide to play the game by those rules. And if you play the game by coming to work and accepting the meager raise you are offered, then you are playing a terrible game.
I left my job for a raise in the area of $15k to $20k to be general. My management chain would have kept me for more. But I left, making it clear that a raise, plus back pay, was the only way to keep me.
One person out of probably 60 or more got an immediate raise because of that. Not me, the guy who still worked there.
And finally, 25% of a lot more is better than 40% of minimum wage.
Did you read The Fountainhead first? Because that is much better written, and really describes the struggle which is the basis of Atlas. After reading The Fountainhead, Atlas Shrugged makes a lot more sense.
It's preachy, and I don't agree with it necessarily, but I understand the point. And I was able to follow the story until the 50 page manifesto at the end. Which I read, but Jesus Christmas just write a manifesto if a single character's speech goes beyond 5 pages.
If you hate The Fountainhead, then just wikipedia the philosophy and consider yourself enlightened.
I actually missed some of the characters, and felt cheated that Atlas wasn't better constructed, considering all of the praise (probably by people who had only heard of it).
Don't try again, start somewhere else first.
No. He once ran a company that attempted to push the boundaries of anti-competitive behavior, but that wasn't evil.
If you don't follow, remember that in American law, anything that is not explicitly forbidden is allowed. And the only way to know if something is forbidden is to :
1) Do it
2) Be challenged (a) by someone who can show harm
3) Have it upheld by the Supreme Court
Anything else means it's legal, or legal in some part of the country, or technically legal while violating the spirit of the law.
I remember when Bill Gates was evil, but I was ignorant then. I have since learned the law, the constitution, and relevant ancillary information.
Challenge for you: Sadeep Napreeka (based on memory, not intended to be an insult) runs the company now, and Windows 10 kinda seems like a privacy nightmare. Comparatively, billg seems tame.
So if someone should down mod you, it seems natural and fair. Up mod seems kinda shill reinforcing shill.
Or maybe someone does not understand America.
Nothing is illegal. Oh, yeah, that should be. Oh and that, and maybe that recent thing. Oh, and let's add that to the list.
America has allowed numerous terrible behaviours, until they demonstrated social harm.
Land of the free, and all that.
Evil has a spiritual connotation. Care to defend?