In my city, you have to keep the sidewalk clear of ice. You can get a $100 penalty for not doing it. It's rarely enforced unless they're trying to lay pressure on an absentee landlord, or if you live in a wealthier area.
Anyway, if somebody slipped and hurt themselves because I didn't maintain my sidewalk, I would totally get slapped with a $100 fine. The city wouldn't pursue it further because that's all I've done wrong. On the other hand, the person who slipped could sue me for medical bills, etc.
In this case, it seems that he got a typical penalty for distracted driving. Probably closer to the maximum, given the circumstances, but I'm not sure. He'll still end up paying the injured couple more directly in a different court.
Don't you understand why? If you watch a youtube video with a song in it, you're depriving the artist of money for their work. It's just like cutting off the hands that played the instrument. But in today's society, these rights are held by corporations which are made up of thousands of people. That's thousands and thousands of hands that you cut off on purpose. Of course there's a higher penalty than smashing off two legs accidentally!
If it's cheaper to the government, then it's also less profitable for the prison. I think that roboguards would lead to a reversal of that trend, and therefore not catch on in the US.
Also, you can still shank a robot, you just need a sharper toothbrush. Maybe something made out of robot parts.
Putting something in print is "publishing" it and thus you extend that to "putting something on Facebook is publishing because it uses text and it is observable by the public". This is IMO false. A status update on Facebook isn't publishing, at least not in the same way that putting an ad in the paper or writing a newspaper article is publishing, nor is it like writing a lengthy blog post. It is more like saying something in public, only you are doing it with text.
The employee isn't necessarily publishing, but they are making criticism available.
I don't understand what is wrong with everyone on the internet. You cry about privacy but willingly give out your real-life information to these websites.
I absolutely disagree with this, but I don't have time to discuss it now. If you want to discuss this further, you can reach me here:
Dan Cruz 656 Maple Ave. San Diego, CA Home: (901) 271-5342 Work: (901) 887-4040 x523 Cell: (901) 279-8601
You can reach me at my $65k/yr job from 8 to 2, and then I go to the gym for an hour. If you have to reach me next week, I'll be on vacation with my wife Julia for six days, so call my cell. Also, this reuben sandwich is dee-licious!
1a. Help & Preferences -> Dynamic Index -> Exclusions: Put a check next to "kdawson" or 1b. Help & Preferences -> Classic Index -> Authors: Uncheck "kdawson" 2. ???? 3. Stop crying yourself to sleep every night there is a kdawson story
Unless the essay is brilliant to two humans, in which case the computer is corrected. The computer only really decides whether a second opinion is needed.
Slashdot Mirror
In my city, you have to keep the sidewalk clear of ice. You can get a $100 penalty for not doing it. It's rarely enforced unless they're trying to lay pressure on an absentee landlord, or if you live in a wealthier area.
Anyway, if somebody slipped and hurt themselves because I didn't maintain my sidewalk, I would totally get slapped with a $100 fine. The city wouldn't pursue it further because that's all I've done wrong. On the other hand, the person who slipped could sue me for medical bills, etc.
In this case, it seems that he got a typical penalty for distracted driving. Probably closer to the maximum, given the circumstances, but I'm not sure. He'll still end up paying the injured couple more directly in a different court.
Don't you understand why? If you watch a youtube video with a song in it, you're depriving the artist of money for their work. It's just like cutting off the hands that played the instrument. But in today's society, these rights are held by corporations which are made up of thousands of people. That's thousands and thousands of hands that you cut off on purpose. Of course there's a higher penalty than smashing off two legs accidentally!
IMHO, $775.00 USD is way too small compensation for two innocent victims
That was a penalty, not compensation. They're still sorting that bit out.
And tons here: http://www.nature.com/nnano/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nnano.2012.20.html
At least one pic here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-17156036
The real hipsters are into bluray. They were into it when everybody else wasn't even over it yet.
How long until we have the emotional equivalent of autotune?
sometimes a second brain is needed in a transaction.
Sometimes just the one would be nice.
If it's cheaper to the government, then it's also less profitable for the prison. I think that roboguards would lead to a reversal of that trend, and therefore not catch on in the US.
Also, you can still shank a robot, you just need a sharper toothbrush. Maybe something made out of robot parts.
Worse than that, if any gets loose it could have a range of up to a kilometer!
2 days... slashdot, what's happened to you?
I know! I love how quick they've become too!
I think you are wrong.
Putting something in print is "publishing" it and thus you extend that to "putting something on Facebook is publishing because it uses text and it is observable by the public". This is IMO false. A status update on Facebook isn't publishing, at least not in the same way that putting an ad in the paper or writing a newspaper article is publishing, nor is it like writing a lengthy blog post. It is more like saying something in public, only you are doing it with text.
The employee isn't necessarily publishing, but they are making criticism available.
</RIAA>
want to find out?
Let's do exactly that!
Then you must have missed this story.
I am constantly irritated when I copy a link, only to paste a wall of text in my little IM window.
Our planet is already secure — you cannot escape it.
Then you aren't going nearly fast enough.
Practical attacks or merely theoretical "well, it's broken under mathematical rules" attacks?
Over time, these converge.
I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time.
This certainly applies to code and, I'm sure, law as well.
It's in the same place. Ground Zero is a park, with a monument marking where the bomb hit.
And in Ohio. In my city, there's no way you can make a left turn otherwise.
Maybe my post wasn't as humorous as I had expected, but I've never seen somebody put so much effort into not getting a joke!
Also, who am I framing for what now?
Yeah, but they did it in that order. You are now 11.
I don't understand what is wrong with everyone on the internet. You cry about privacy but willingly give out your real-life information to these websites.
I absolutely disagree with this, but I don't have time to discuss it now. If you want to discuss this further, you can reach me here:
Dan Cruz
656 Maple Ave.
San Diego, CA
Home: (901) 271-5342
Work: (901) 887-4040 x523
Cell: (901) 279-8601
You can reach me at my $65k/yr job from 8 to 2, and then I go to the gym for an hour. If you have to reach me next week, I'll be on vacation with my wife Julia for six days, so call my cell. Also, this reuben sandwich is dee-licious!
1a. Help & Preferences -> Dynamic Index -> Exclusions: Put a check next to "kdawson"
or
1b. Help & Preferences -> Classic Index -> Authors: Uncheck "kdawson"
2. ????
3. Stop crying yourself to sleep every night there is a kdawson story
Unless the essay is brilliant to two humans, in which case the computer is corrected. The computer only really decides whether a second opinion is needed.