Slashdot Mirror


Designer Creates "Euthanasia Roller Coaster"

disco_tracy writes "Lithuanian amusement park worker and current PhD candidate in London's Royal College of Art's Design Interactions department, Julijonas Urbonas, has made a design for a hypothetical coaster that could be the future of humane euthanasia. Urbonas says that it is engineered to give a person a way to die with 'with elegance and euphoria.' From the article: 'The three-minute ride involves a long, slow, climb -- nearly a third of a mile long -- that lifts one up to a height of more than 1,600 feet, followed by a massive fall and seven strategically sized and placed loops. The final descent and series of loops take all of one minute. But the gravitational force -- 10 Gs -- from the spinning loops at 223 miles per hour in that single minute is lethal.'"

409 comments

  1. I've seen people die... by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... and there isn't a thing elegant about it.

    1. Re:I've seen people die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Support life extension.

    2. Re:I've seen people die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And being slowly crushed to death by increasing G force doesn't exactly strike me as "euphoric" either. Other than that, this sounds like an awesome plan. Oh, and the fact that that most people looking to euthanize themselves are elderly and too frail for a roller coaster. And would probably be absolutely terrified if they were stuck on one.

    3. Re:I've seen people die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The closest I've seen to an "elegant" death is within hospice.

    4. Re:I've seen people die... by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Another century of eating frozen pizza, driving to the mall and playing Super Mario Brothers. What's not to like?

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    5. Re:I've seen people die... by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 3, Funny

      My god man! Were you raised by wolves?

      You don't think it "Euphoric" to die by being centrifugally-forced into shitting out your internal organs?

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    6. Re:I've seen people die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think there is such a thing as "too frail" for a roller coaster that is meant to end the life of its passengers.

      And, if you are choosing to kill yourself, why would the roller coaster be any more terrifying than anything else?

    7. Re:I've seen people die... by somersault · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you missed the "long, slow, climb" part. That's bad enough even when you're not sure you're going to die. By the time you hit the top you'd be wishing you had a gun. Maybe they'll put guns under the seats.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    8. Re:I've seen people die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, if there's somebody who wants to die they should be forced to live because you say so.

      Any other ways you'd like to control other people, or are you done for the day?

    9. Re:I've seen people die... by icebike · · Score: 1

      I don't see why it would matter if you died on the way up from fright or died on the way down from a snapped neck or simply crushed to death.

      In either case you arrive at the end of the ride with pee soaked pants, vomit caked shirt, and underwear bulging and smelling worse
      than you ever did while living. Probably to be unceremoniously dumped into a coffin by uncaring attendants dressed in Tyvec suits and breathing gear.

      Such Elegance!!

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    10. Re:I've seen people die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, when it means you have to suffer through the agony of dozens of broken bones before the g forces finally shove your organs out your asshole, I think you can definitely be too frail for a rollercoaster meant to kill you.

    11. Re:I've seen people die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a crush death. It's a lack-of-oxygen-to-brain death.

    12. Re:I've seen people die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      especially when they shit their pants...

    13. Re:I've seen people die... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      I dunno about you Stan...but I'm dying to ride this thing!!!!

      :)

      Thank you...I'll be here all week....try the veal....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    14. Re:I've seen people die... by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      You forgot the link

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    15. Re:I've seen people die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Death should be a surprise. I certainly enjoy it more when I don't give them any warning.

    16. Re:I've seen people die... by morari · · Score: 2

      Sure there is. I've been bedside and holding the hand of three different people as they expired. Death is about the only elegant part of aging. Keeping people as living vegetables in hospitals and nursing homes isn't elegant. It's greedy and selfish.

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    17. Re:I've seen people die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The closest I've seen to an "elegant" death is within hospice.

      There's absolutely nothing farther from an elegant death than spending your last days being cleaned up because you can't make the trip to the bathroom. Hospices are a horrible way to spend your last days. Going through this roller coaster is also a pretty bad way to spend your last minutes, but actually...still better than the hospice.

    18. Re:I've seen people die... by flaming+error · · Score: 2

      Somebody read TFA.

      I just wanted to nitpick and point out that every death is "a lack-of-oxygen-to-brain death," by medical definition. The interesting question is the reason oxygen stopped going to the brain, the "cause of death."

      In this case, I believe the medical diagnosis would be "terminal velocity."

    19. Re:I've seen people die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And there doesn't have to.

      It takes a special kind of egomaniacal sadist to force a person to live the true and real living hell that those people have to go through that euthanasia is meant for.
      Anyone with a heart just can't stand that kind of suffering.

      Every day that I stand there, doing nothing, while thousands of people are suffering like that, I am a monster as bad as a concentration camp torturer. And every day I'm not ignorant about it, feeling for them is killing me.

      I don't know about you, ... but... fuck elegance!

    20. Re:I've seen people die... by RubberChainsaw · · Score: 2

      This system isn't crushing a person to death. It is using force-induced hypoxia to deprive the brain of oxygen.

      The trouble is that force-induced hypoxia is not an elegant method of death. Fighter-pilots and people who have ridden a cetrifuge know the distress caused by excessive G-force on the body.

      However, a painless and humane method of hypoxia can be achieved by depriving the subject of oxygen in the air, and replacing it with an inert, non-toxic gas that does not irritate the body. My preferred method of death would be death by altitude chamber induced hypoxia.

      An episode of BBC's Horizon followed a former minister on a search for the most humane method of execution. The final outcome was that the most humane method of execution was via similar method of hypoxia, which also happens to be fairly inexpensive, as well.

      --
      I welcome our new 99% overlords.
    21. Re:I've seen people die... by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 2

      Sure there is. I've been bedside and holding the hand of three different people as they expired. Death is about the only elegant part of aging.

      I've been there too. Watching the failing struggle to stay awake and aware because, in between stretches of tiredness and confusion, they have moments of absolute clarity where they realize they'll never open their eyes again once they close them.

      Hours later, watching them still breathing slowly but far too slowly to maintain consciousness or even sleep. The body struggles desperately on even after the mind has left, a loved one reduced to little more than a broken automaton. Holding a hand that's only warm because of the warmth from your own hand. It's like watching someone slowly drown that you can never save. Not what I call elegant.

      Keeping people as living vegetables in hospitals and nursing homes isn't elegant. It's greedy and selfish.

      Oh, you mean "relatively" elegant. Sure, dying in a hospital bed would be way better than bleeding out after a robbery, but that doesn't make it in any way good.

    22. Re:I've seen people die... by rhook · · Score: 1

      Probably to be unceremoniously dumped into a coffin by uncaring attendants dressed in Tyvec suits and breathing gear.

      Such Elegance!!

      At the end of the ride the coaster likely flips upside down and dumps the corpses into a waiting furnace, then proceeds through an automated wash before arriving at the start for the next load. Efficient!

    23. Re:I've seen people die... by quiet+down · · Score: 1

      The video in TFA states that there would be a button somewhere that the rider would have to press to make the coaster go down the final drop, so there is a way of chickening out.

    24. Re:I've seen people die... by Threni · · Score: 1

      To nitpick further, though, I'm not sure that those who died in either the planes or when the buildings collapsed during "the attacks of 9/11" died for that reason.

      And even in more traditional deaths, the fact that oxygen stops going to the brain after death doesn't mean it was the cause of death, any more than your toes going cold was.

    25. Re:I've seen people die... by Smelly+Jeffrey · · Score: 1
    26. Re:I've seen people die... by 1_brown_mouse · · Score: 1

      That makes for some really expensive urine.

    27. Re:I've seen people die... by 1_brown_mouse · · Score: 1

      I like listening to the machine that goes ping as is slows down further and further.

    28. Re:I've seen people die... by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      David Carradine?

      --
      bickerdyke
    29. Re:I've seen people die... by _4rp4n3t · · Score: 1

      underwear bulging and smelling worse than you ever did while living

      You must not have met my granny.

    30. Re:I've seen people die... by MarkTina · · Score: 1

      So what is your alternative then ?

      I'm sure there are thousands of people world wide who would love to be able to flick a switch and just turn themselves off to escape the misery of they are in!

      If you were given a choice to be stuck in a bed, being fed cocktails of drugs to keep your failing body clinging to life, all the while your family and friends get to experience watching you decay, wouldn't you want a way out ? Not just to relieve your trauma but to let your family get their lives straightened out as well ?

      Or are you the sort of person who thinks that would condem you to eternal torment because you failed to endure the years of agony he/she/it/they had lined up for you ?

      Everyone has a choice, let people chose their own fate. And if the person is not able to chose for themselves, then let their friends, family and loved ones chose for them.

    31. Re:I've seen people die... by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      ...try the veal....

      For those too impatient for the rollercoaster to be built ....

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    32. Re:I've seen people die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen people die, and I would have to disagree

    33. Re:I've seen people die... by morari · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately, you can't avoid death. If you want to make it more "elegant", then I would suggest that euthanasia as the obvious choice. There are plenty of methods available that would allow for a quicker death, long before your loved one is laid up in the hospital and barely even aware of their surroundings. :(

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    34. Re:I've seen people die... by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 2

      So what is your alternative then ?

      I wasn't aware that criticizing someone for calling death, specifically a killer roller coaster death, "elegant" required me to also fix the problem of human mortality. Sorry, I'll get right on that.

    35. Re:I've seen people die... by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 2

      When training us about "confined space entries" at one chemical company I worked at (before switching to writing business software... as opposed to chemical process modelling), they told us about a contractor who entered a confined space at one of our plants without a confined space entry permit where nitrogen lines were vented (over-pressure vents or something like that). Before he entered, the lines vented a lot of nitrogen, displacing all the oxygen. From what I heard, the investigators figured the guy walked in the room and dropped unconscious almost immediately, and died very, very soon thereafter. Very quick and painless. i.e.He didn't know what hit him.

      The rule at the place (following OSHA guidelines) was that to enter a confined space required authorization from someone trained and authorized to sign the permits. The permits were always time based never lasting more than a half shift (e.g. if you got a permit in the morning, you needed another one to either continue working more than four hours, or to go back in after you took any sort of break). And you always had to have a spotter/safety person, and be roped off, and have breathing and/or other required safety gear. This was always explained to all workers and contractors. As part of the authorization, O2 levels, explosive gas levels, poison gas levels are measured in the confined space either by monitors permanently mounted in the room/confined space, or by probes pushed into the space. Gas lines would be capped/locked out, dangerous equipment locked out etc. Notices posted and operations personal warned not to start up equipment in the space (even though the equipment is locked out anyway... redundancy and communication). This guy was authorized to work in that room in the morning. The permit expired, and the vent lines opened after they left at lunch during some operations activities. Without authorization the guy came back after lunch and thought it would be OK to just go in for a minute to retrieve something he forgot inside without asking for a permit (which hey, would take too much time for just ducking in and out of the room). But like I said, the room had no oxygen in it. He walked in without proper authorization and dropped pretty much on the spot. Just because you might take 4 minutes to die if you stop breathing, doesn't mean you won't pass out really fast, or die fast if you displace the oxygen in your lungs.

      But the guy probably didn't feel any distress... or very little since they found him just inside the doorway. That is, he didn't last long inside the room. Poor guy. And FWIW, I consider that company to be very good on safety and it had a very low lost time injury count compared to many others. This was a clear incident of not following standard safety practices.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    36. Re:I've seen people die... by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      most people looking to euthanize themselves are elderly and too frail for a roller coaster.

      You mean they could die in a roller coaster?

    37. Re:I've seen people die... by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately, you can't avoid death.

      True. But name one person who people say "died elegantly". Peacefully. Violently. Quietly. Heroically. Instantly. Alone. But never gracefully, or artistically, or "in a refined manner".

      Death is an inherently ugly thing. He can tart it up all he wants, it's still someone's life ending and he's describing it like he's found a one-line fix for a particularly annoying software bug. Of course, it's also a goddamn roller coaster, so expecting him to appreciate the plight of the terminally ill is perhaps asking too much.

    38. Re:I've seen people die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, so long as I black out first during the acceleration back towards earth.

    39. Re:I've seen people die... by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      "in a refined manner"

      When I drink the hemlock, I will be sure to hold my pinky aloft.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    40. Re:I've seen people die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that much different than lethal injection? My understanding was that the first dose puts you in a coma.

    41. Re:I've seen people die... by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you are only permitted to criticize something if you also have a completely infallible solution to the problem.

      For example, this roller coaster idea is great, because if anybody does live through it, they immediately are offered a long term consulting job with the Air Force, helping to research high-G forces on humans.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    42. Re:I've seen people die... by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 2

      Death is an inherently ugly thing.

      Subjective. As far as I know, there is nothing "inherently ugly" about anything.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    43. Re:I've seen people die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen people die from die from high G-Force, that's even less elegant and definitely not pleasant.

    44. Re:I've seen people die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a good suicide method too. It's the way I've chosen.

    45. Re:I've seen people die... by opposabledumbs · · Score: 1

      From the article, and the pictures that go with it, I think the thing that is being described as elegant is the rollercoaster itself. This guy is a Ph.D in design, and you kind of get the feeling that he had a great idea for a rollercoaster and tacked on the euthanasia part to get some deeper meaning to it - one which is a little ridiculous, as people have pointed out here.

      But that coaster itself is quite beautiful, and would make a fantastic desk toy.

    46. Re:I've seen people die... by slackbheep · · Score: 1

      +1 For reminding me of that episode, it was quite interesting to see the varying opinions of those involved in the carrying out of capital punishment. If I recall correctly it was an American warden who explained that it was not desirable to him to execute prisoners humanely. Believing instead that they should suffer regardless as part of the punishment.

    47. Re:I've seen people die... by slackbheep · · Score: 2

      While I hesitate to comment as I feel I am treading on your grief to do so it really must be said that we will all eventually have to die. Some choose to fight for every last moment that they may spend with their loved ones, others may choose to meet the end sooner than later on their own terms for other reasons, whether fear of a long drawn out ordeal, or what have you. In relation to this I interpreted his comments about elegance to be relative to other potential ends we may face, and a comment on our right to self determination.

    48. Re:I've seen people die... by Stone2065 · · Score: 1

      ...KILLER ride!!!

      (yes, I had to...)

      --
      Stone
    49. Re:I've seen people die... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Clearly the answer is asphyxiation by Nitrous Oxide.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    50. Re:I've seen people die... by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 1

      Subjective. As far as I know, there is nothing "inherently ugly" about anything.

      Jocelyn Wildenstein?

    51. Re:I've seen people die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think depriving the brain of oxygen for less than a minute is going to induce hypoxia on a lethal level.. it takes about 16 mins to choke somebody to death with your bare hands!

    52. Re:I've seen people die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see dying in a hospital bed as being more elegant that bleeding out after a robbery. 2-5 minutes of pain while bleeding out. 2-5 months of pain as cancer gnaws at your guts or gasping for breath with congestive heart failure.

      We really do need a 2 or 3 stage lethal pill. Put different coatings on them so they dissolve differentially. First one makes you lose consciousness, second and third are two a two component poison where neither alone is terribly risky.

      ***

      As to the original proposal, can you imagine having the job of emptying the rollercoaster?

    53. Re:I've seen people die... by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      Probably to be unceremoniously dumped into a coffin by uncaring attendants dressed in Tyvec suits and breathing gear.

      Such Elegance!!

      At the end of the ride the coaster likely flips upside down and dumps the corpses into a waiting furnace, then proceeds through an automated wash before arriving at the start for the next load. Efficient!

      Yes it's almost like German's came up with the design.

  2. It'll never fly by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Funny

    Too dangerous.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    1. Re:It'll never fly by Hojima · · Score: 1

      Not to mention it's a pain in the ass. Even if people want to die, it's only to end their suffering, the anticipation of death is still distressful. I'd take the trip to Amsterdam & coke-overdose vacation package over this any day.

    2. Re:It'll never fly by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      I'd probably pull a Benjamin, from "Leaving Las Vegas".

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    3. Re:It'll never fly by CaptainPatent · · Score: 4, Funny

      Besides, hundreds of rollercoasters just like this have been designed before...

      It was called Roller Coaster Tycoon.

      --
      Well, back to rejecting software patent applications.
    4. Re:It'll never fly by blackicye · · Score: 1

      Talk about a roller coaster ride to die for!

    5. Re:It'll never fly by Talderas · · Score: 2

      I used to play that. I would get a successful park then after that I would see how quickly I could kill my attendance with death coasters. The best part was that deleting a single track space and rebuilding it would make visitors thing it was a whole new roller coaster that was safe! Silly stupid AI humans. I also made sure all my janitors didn't bother with vomit. I still had the sweep the paths, clean up the trash, and mow the grass but I made vomit a feature!

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
  3. How nice by turgid · · Score: 1

    Crushed to death.

    I'd rather take the barbiturates, thanks.

    1. Re:How nice by supersat · · Score: 1

      High G-forces cut off the brain's oxygen supply, so I suspect you'd die of that long before you'd be crushed to death.

    2. Re:How nice by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      If not crushed to death subjected to cardiovascular stress your body can't cope with, neither sounds fun.

      If you look how Medical doctors who commit suicide do it, barbiturates are their most common method. Which makes sense because doctors have access to drugs so they are more likely to choose drugs, but the fact they select that class of drug, suggests its probably the most comfortable way to end it all. They would be the experts after all..

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    3. Re:How nice by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      What I've never quite understood is why any kind of drugs is preferable to, say, a .22LR (to prevent it being overly messy) bullet to the head? Surely the latter is instantaneous, and likely much more foolproof in a DIY case than any chemical solution?

    4. Re:How nice by Skidborg · · Score: 1

      And yet there is that nagging question, what if you survive? You body crushed by g-forces, your brain now a barely functioning vegetable due to blood starvation...

      --
      Supporter of the +1 Over Dramatic mod option. In memory of apk.
    5. Re:How nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mostly because the bullet isn't foolproof either. I've seen people who tried to commit suicide and failed. Brain damage and worse. One guy blew his entire jaw and part of his right cheek away with a shotgun and was left paralyzed from the neck down. Now he can't kill himself if he wants to.

    6. Re:How nice by Zerth · · Score: 1

      Or a tent with a nitrogen/oxygen feed that gradually turns to all nitrogen.

      If you don't mind the waste of a scarce resource or releasing a potent greenhouse gas, you may substitute helium or sulfur hexafluoride for a cheap laugh.

    7. Re:How nice by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      10g is not enough to crush you. It's enough to cause the blood to pool in your extremities, depriving your brain of oxygen, but wouldn't otherwise harm your body with any long-term effects.

    8. Re:How nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      22LR is adequate, but there are cases where people have taken larger bullets through or deep into some parts of the brain and lived. In death as in life, caliber is secondary, shot placement is everything; I suspect fear you'll be one of the horribly unlucky SOBs who gets it wrong is why some choose drugs, although doctors especially should have no trouble doing the research and getting it right...

    9. Re:How nice by icebike · · Score: 1

      What I've never quite understood is why any kind of drugs is preferable to, say, a .22LR (to prevent it being overly messy) bullet to the head? Surely the latter is instantaneous, and likely much more foolproof in a DIY case than any chemical solution?

      Way too many people linger and bleed out (or live) after being shot in the head with small caliber weapons. (Gabby Gifford).

      You want it messy, its the only way you can be sure you don't suffer. Who cares about the mess?

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    10. Re:How nice by turgid · · Score: 1

      Interesting. What does sulphur hexafluoride do?

    11. Re:How nice by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      Yes, and they do it in an incredibly uncomfortable way. I'd be willing to bet that the person who suggested this has never pulled more than about 2Gs. When the acceleration is enough that it's hard to pump blood up into your head, you experience nausea and lots of small pains. This generally starts mildly at around 4Gs and becomes progressively worse as the force increases.

      Basically, this idea sounds like someone saying 'well, the blood draining out of your brain is quite a relaxing way to die, we should chop people's balls off for euthanasia so that their blood will drain out quickly and they'll have a quick and peaceful death.'

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    12. Re:How nice by MasterPatricko · · Score: 1

      Essentially, opposite of the effect of helium on the vocal tract. It's way denser than air so you end up with a deep-sounding voice.

      --
      I'd tell a UDP joke, but you may not get it. I'd tell a TCP joke, but I'd have to keep repeating it until you got it.
    13. Re:How nice by Yaotzin · · Score: 1

      Surely the latter is instantaneous, and likely much more foolproof in a DIY case than any chemical solution?

      You would be surprised...

      --
      Error: No error occurred
    14. Re:How nice by f8l_0e · · Score: 1

      Opposite of Helium. It makes your voice sound really deep.

    15. Re:How nice by retchdog · · Score: 1

      it's still messy and a bit fiddly to secure the gun in such a way that it can't slip or be pulled away instinctively, and also to aim for the brain stem. the cheapest solution is probably to shave one's head, duct tape an L bracket to the barrel, and then use a lot of duct tape to secure the upper bar of the L bracket to the back of the shaved noggin (use a mirror to ensure aim).

      at any rate, a gun's not going to be totally clean anyway and, as others have said: the cleaner, the less reliable. i'd say, just go to the woods (or anywhere that the mess doesn't matter so much) and use a shotgun in the manner described above. animals will probably eat your brain bits pretty quickly; if you want to be really courteous, dig a shallow hole and do it in there.

      also, guns are not legal everywhere and some folks might want to die but be hesitant to pull a trigger for whatever reason.

      personally, i'd advocate to inhale an inert gas like nitrogen through a facemask in a well-ventilated room. the idea of "falling asleep forever" is more comfortable than blowing your brains out, and this is probably behind the use of drugs (with the addition that using the right drugs can actually be pleasant as well). my hypothesis is that one subconsciously believes that there's still time to back out, while still knowing that the sedation/unconsciousness will pretty much set in immediately (precisely, before one can act coherently to undo the situation). it's a mind trick. finally, to save what little dignity you have left, be sure to wear some Depends.

      pure nitrogen is quite easy to obtain, but i'll leave out these details.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    16. Re:How nice by Squiddie · · Score: 1

      I have nice carpet, and I'd rather it stay that way.

    17. Re:How nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try google searching 'survived a bullet to the head' and prepare to be amazed.

      And by using a smaller calibre bullet, you're just increasing your odds of survival.

    18. Re:How nice by SETIGuy · · Score: 1

      A .22LR isn't really up to the task. There are too many ways for it to penetrate without resulting in certain death. If you want a certain kill with a .22 you're better off with a shot to the carotid, but that'll take some time to kill you might be found before you're done. If you want to kill with a shot to the brain you need something with enough energy to cause major disruption, and that's going to be a mess.

      Chemisty, on the other hand, can be pretty foolproof. You need two things, something that will put you out, and something that will take you out. They don't necessarily need to be different things. Best case is probably a series of injections, but then you need to build a machine to administer them, so you don't need to ask a person to do it.

    19. Re:How nice by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      It's a whopping one-minute ride. Methinks he underestimates how long the brain can survive anoxia without permanent damage (hint: close to five minutes). If you physically came through the ride, you'd return to consciousness somewhere in the runout area, feeling like crap.

    20. Re:How nice by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Bullet to the head is far from foolproof. You can loose a good bit of skull and brain and live through it with surprising results.

      Remember the end of Fight Club where the guy shot half his head off and lives? That happens. It's not pretty, and it happens.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    21. Re:How nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it's not and especially not that calibre. Doing it yourself that way is easy to screw up and live, though you get to be deformed/have brain damage afterwards.

      When I was in Switzerland stepping in front of trains was very popular as a form of suicide.

    22. Re:How nice by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      As others have said, a .22LR is hardly adequate blah blah. I've heard of people surviving even from poorly executed shotgun suicide attempts... and it's the kind of thing you really don't want to fuck up (because no matter how things seem bad now, it will be infinity worse after)

      Lets move on to the other bit: it seems men are the ones who tend to 'violent' (gross/physical destructive) means, where women go for the peaceful (targeted/systemic destructive) means.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    23. Re:How nice by QuasiSteve · · Score: 2

      When the acceleration is enough that it's hard to pump blood up into your head, you experience nausea and lots of small pains.

      For the more adventurous among you, you can test mild varieties of this yourself by swinging your arm, extended, making circles with your hand.

      Do this at a normal pace, compare that hand to the other, it'll be a fair bit more red.
      Do this faster, and you'll start to feel some of that 'small pains' - it's not entirely unlike when your hand's 'asleep', but more painful.
      Go faster still and you'll have successfully flung blood cells up toward your skin, which is now mottled with little red pinpricks. Don't worry, it should disappear in a day or two. ( But if it doesn't, don't blame me.. blame yourself for actually trying this, you nutter. )

      Now imagine that scaled up just that tiny bit more and involving not just your fingertips but pretty much your entire body including internal organs.

      Doesn't sound particularly comfortable to me.

      Pretty sure I also read about this story several months back, somewhere.. oh well.

    24. Re:How nice by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Look up "survived bullet to the head" on Google and you'll understand.

      At least one man has survived a shotgun blast to his own face. Use something chemically poisonous ... don't trust your body to fail when you damage it.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    25. Re:How nice by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "And yet there is that nagging question, what if you survive?"

      Hurray! A billionaire demand won for broken contract and then another billionaire demand won for broken bones.

      If I am not going to die at least I'll live like a billionaire.

    26. Re:How nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the ballad of the flexible bullet. having the shot bounce off your skull or, penetrate, then follow the internal curve of the skull and exit, or lodge in your brain and not kill you.

      those sorts of things.

    27. Re:How nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because drugs are always preferable in any situation

    28. Re:How nice by Baloroth · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This was my thought as well. Some acceleration can be fun, but it is very uncomfortable beyond a certain point, and enough to kill you would be extremely painful. You want death to be either non-violent or extremely quick, if possible. This is neither. And several minutes of anticipation? Fuck no. I'll take a morphine OD (which seems painless from what I know of it), if it comes to that.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    29. Re:How nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go again! :D

    30. Re:How nice by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Family concerns. Drugs leave a nice clean corpse. If you're putting the family through a suicide, it'll only make things harder if they have to grieve over a corpse with half the face blown off.

    31. Re:How nice by doublebackslash · · Score: 1

      It may be, but there is a nagging question of that last moment or last moments. It should be painless, but who knows what the last few minutes of a mind mangled and slowly bleeding out are like... On the other hand some drugs have a nice clean predictable effect, at least on the conscience mind.

      I'm not saying that my retirement plan doesn't have a caliber attached to it, nor that I believe the above has any bearing on truth... but it scares some people too much to cope with. Hell, OTHER PEOPLE committing suicide (with good reason, not a "tragic" suicide. I'll let that one be) to end their suffering scares people enough to erect massive sets of laws and beliefs around it.

      --
      md5sum /boot/vmlinuz
      d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e /boot/vmlinuz
    32. Re:How nice by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      No it's not and especially not that calibre. Doing it yourself that way is easy to screw up and live, though you get to be deformed/have brain damage afterwards.

      When I was in Switzerland stepping in front of trains was very popular as a form of suicide.

      And people even survive the hit from the train. Okay, they lose a few limbs here and there. But it happens.

      The best way is to have a doctor administer medication. First step: barbiturates to induce coma and make sure the patient doesn't feel anything. Step two: a lethal dose of muscle relaxant to paralyze the lungs and kill the patient.

      No need to get on that stupid death-ride at all. Especially not if you can't get up or are very sick.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    33. Re:How nice by EdIII · · Score: 1

      we should chop people's balls off for euthanasia so that their blood will drain out quickly and they'll have a quick and peaceful death

      I'm sure there are plenty of married men that will debate the "quick" and "peaceful death" statements with you.

    34. Re:How nice by doublebackslash · · Score: 1

      I've blacked out from helium inhalation before. It was 100% painless and actually so sudden than I did not recall my journey to the floor

      This would be highly effective, humane, and dignified (as death can be). Less scary than drugs and guns, at least.

      --
      md5sum /boot/vmlinuz
      d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e /boot/vmlinuz
    35. Re:How nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because if you don't get the job done right with the .22, you can end up a vegetable or in a wheelchair, and people trying to save your life could end up bankrupting you or your children. If you don't do it right with painkillers, you're much more likely to just throw up, or to just wake up with no permanent ill effects. Plus, it's easier mentally to swallow pills, knowing that it's not immediate, than it is to pull a trigger.

    36. Re:How nice by Reeses · · Score: 1

      A .22 LR frequently doesn't do enough damage to actually kill. The bullet's too small and moving at too high of a velocity to get stopped by anything inside your skull.

      Usually, it just ricochets around inside your skull, moving the grey matter around, but not causing actual death. The condition of the victims after this varies, from being relatively unaffected, to severe brain damage.

      If you want to do it that way, you need a much bigger gauge weapon. Or a shotgun. Just make sure you point it in the right direction. It's quite common to miss. Especially with people that have never fired guns before.

      -RT

      --
      Reeses
    37. Re:How nice by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Ironic that this comment has got the most replies, by far, compared to anything I've ever posted on Slashdot in 7 years. I'd never think that this topic would be so popular with the audience hereabouts.

      What up with that, anyway? Do all geeks research their eventual way out in advance?

    38. Re:How nice by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      likely much more foolproof in a DIY case than any chemical solution?

      Sorry, fools have improved since then. Firearms have a much lower success rate than people guess. Purposeful overdose is very successful when any reasonable drug is chosen (don't use Tylenol, liver failure sucks, even if it's easy to buy a lethal dose with no one noticing or caring, though still quite effective).

    39. Re:How nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I've never quite understood is why any kind of drugs is preferable to, say, a .22LR (to prevent it being overly messy) bullet to the head? Surely the latter is instantaneous, and likely much more foolproof in a DIY case than any chemical solution?

      Not really. Gunshot wounds to the brain aren't always fatal (e.g. Gabrielle Giffords). To kill yourself quickly you need to hit a major blood vessel, or a specific part of the brain concerned with respiration. If you get it wrong you can easily end up as a vegetable or lobotomised or somewhere in between.

      Drugs... I guess the major danger is putting yourself to sleep and oxygen starving your brain. I once heard of an anaesthetist who injected himself with Propofol (same as Michael Jackson) but it acted so quickly he passed out before he had injected enough to kill him. Incidentally, regular painkillers such as paracetamol (acetaminophen) are one of the worst ways to go.

    40. Re:How nice by cybrpnk2 · · Score: 1

      A self-inflicted 22LR to the head killed my mother in 1979. A friend of mine had a daughter that used a .38 on herself and is a vegetable in a nursing home. You never know.

    41. Re:How nice by cybrpnk2 · · Score: 1

      Helium has gained a lot of traction in recent years as the suicide vehicle of choice. It has progressively become more central in every update of Final Exit.

    42. Re:How nice by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      morphine takes away the fear of death as much if not more than pain. i wonder if i was given the opportunity to take morphine just for the hell of it would i be able to turn it down or would i risk the chance of addiction and if i did take that chance would i continue up and beyond the point of addiction.

      yes it is that good or bad, but certainly a good way to die, without fear or apprehension.

    43. Re:How nice by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      People have actually lived after being shot in the head... Heck I recall a case of a person who had a rod pierce through their head and it was medically removed only for them to live a normal life... Yes most people die, but it certainly isn't fun when they don't....

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    44. Re:How nice by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      Nitrogen isn't a greenhosue gas and neither is oxygen... As the two most abundant airborne chemicals, either would cause a rather critical issue if it were to be a green house gas. Together they make up 99% of what we breathe, 78.08% for Nitrogen and 20.95% oxygen.

      The most common Greenouse gases are: water vapor (0 to 4% varies by area), carbon dioxide (0.0360%), methane (0.00017%), nitrous oxide (0.00003%), and lower atmosphere ozone (0.000004%). None of which you mentioned.

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    45. Re:How nice by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      Death by Snu-Snu!

      --
      bickerdyke
    46. Re:How nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Going off some trends noticed in people wanting to "learn about computer security"...

      maybe researching how to put one through your own skull is a covert method of researching how to execute someone? O.o

    47. Re:How nice by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      If that were the case, I doubt many people would worry about it not being painless enough, and one bullet possibly not being fatal (you always double-tap, right? ~).

    48. Re:How nice by PeanutButterBreath · · Score: 1

      The poor lethality of the .22 has been a crime drama cliche for as long as I can remember.

    49. Re:How nice by Zerth · · Score: 1

      Indeed, neither nitrogen, oxygen, nor helium is a greenhouse gas. Sulfur hexaflouride, which I also mentioned, is. But then you clearly didn't read past "greenhouse gas".

      If you had read a little further down the list of greenhouse gasses, you'd have seen that while SF6 only makes up about 7 ppt, its unit effect is some 20,000 times that of carbon dioxide(it is worse than most CFCs). But I rather doubt you've even read this far.

      Relatively little SF6 is released, so it isn't a big deal, I just threw that out to prevent greenies from getting on my case. Didn't expect to troll with it.

    50. Re:How nice by moortak · · Score: 1

      Sulfur hexaflouride, which he did mention, is a potent greenhouse gas.

      --
      Xavier Rabourdin for president 2012
    51. Re:How nice by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Chemisty, on the other hand, can be pretty foolproof. You need two things, something that will put you out, and something that will take you out. They don't necessarily need to be different things. Best case is probably a series of injections, but then you need to build a machine to administer them, so you don't need to ask a person to do it.

      How about an enteric coating for phase 2?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    52. Re:How nice by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      You want it messy, its the only way you can be sure you don't suffer. Who cares about the mess?

      Bloody messes are expensive and unpleasant to clean up. I guess if you contract for the job ahead of time, it's not a big deal. Leaving somebody else with the problem would be posthumously rude.

      I'd imagine somebody could build a kevlar hood/bag to sell to the market that would probably be much cheaper than a professional cleaner.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    53. Re:How nice by icebike · · Score: 1

      Go outside..
      Suicide is selfish and rude enough that worrying about the mess seems out of place.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    54. Re:How nice by jason777 · · Score: 1

      Then a guy walks over and just shoots you in the head.

    55. Re:How nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides the possibility of failure, there's the aesthetics issue. You don't want to look bad for the ladies in that casket, do you?

    56. Re:How nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      O_o? Rare and potent Greenhouse gas? You do realize that Nitrogen makes up about 70% or our atmosphere, right?

    57. Re:How nice by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Hence 22LR - that should leave one tidy, accurate hole, with a few splatters of blood for the sake of aesthetics. I hear it's all the rage this season. ~

    58. Re:How nice by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Go outside..

      I guess, if you can figure out a place where the body won't be found. If you just pop yourself in the back yard, the coroner's office will want to collect all the bits.

      Suicide is selfish and rude enough that worrying about the mess seems out of place.

      Yeah? Somebody suffering greatly from a terminal disease is selfish and rude if he wants to end it?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    59. Re:How nice by dudpixel · · Score: 3

      The red bull air race has a limit of 12g - indicating that pilots can survive even that much.

      I have witnessed pilots exceed 12g and be disqualified because of it - and the same pilot complained that the 12g limit was stupid. The limit is there to stop pilots from pushing it too far, in a bid to curb "lap" times.

      However, how many super-fit and healthy people would be interested in euthanasia? not many I'd guess.

      --
      This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
    60. Re:How nice by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      If they had no limits, whoever pulls the most Gs wins. It would be a contest where the loser blacks out and dies, and Red Bull doesn't want to support death sports, so we get a reasonable limit (though higher than I'd consider safe, but that's their call, not mine).

    61. Re:How nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because there's a relatively high rate of survival, and if you do survive it will be really bad... Brain damage leading to paralysis or permanently reduced mental capability, facial disfigurement etc. Contrary to popular belief, people's heads don't explode when hit by a small bullet, and the part of the brain that you need to hit to instantly kill yourself is actually pretty small. Most of the brain is there for convenient things like motor control, memory, and otherwise not beeing a drooling idiot.

    62. Re:How nice by bejiitas_wrath · · Score: 1

      Phosgene gas in an oxygen tent would work, I have inhaled that before and it just made me want to go to sleep. That would be very peaceful.

      --
      liberare massarum ex ignorantia, clausa descendit molestie.
    63. Re:How nice by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 1

      Yup. Even if one minute is SOLELY the "loop the loop" part, not the big fall or the climb, it wouldn't be enough to kill you.

      According to NASA, testers survived 17 Gs for "several minutes" without serious long-term harm. One minute at 10 Gs isn't going to do it.

      Source: http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19980223621_1998381731.pdf

      --
      Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
      The purpose of that site was not known.
    64. Re:How nice by Zironic · · Score: 2

      You can survive 10g momentarily, what kills you is that it's 10g for an -entire minute- which above poster points out is long enough for your brain to die from oxygen deprivation.

    65. Re:How nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The brain is remarkably resilient to this sort of thing. It could quite easily blow off a chunk of flesh, rendering you retarded, incontinent, with short term memory damage, long term memory damage or yes - best case scenario - dead but it's much riskier than a buttload of barbituates.

    66. Re:How nice by AmonTheMetalhead · · Score: 1

      Nah, make yourself an explosive helmet

    67. Re:How nice by AmonTheMetalhead · · Score: 1

      He shot a hole in his cheek if I remember correctly

    68. Re:How nice by AmonTheMetalhead · · Score: 1

      You gotta be prepared for every situation, including how to die ;)

    69. Re:How nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because the author confuses euthanasia with suicide. People that want euthanasia are usually very sick, and life only gives them even more pain as time passes. It's something anyone who ever felt pain would understand. Suicide is about the self, it's not about stopping pain, but running away from life or going out with a bang simply to get attention.

      Need I mention, that a lot of people who are asking euthanasia, are asking because they can't physically do it themselves?

      Oh, and architects, designers etc, usually build things they themselves intend to use, is this a hint to that man's mental stability?

    70. Re:How nice by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      I've had 6g in an airplane, and all it did was blur my vision, remove colors, and give me a feeling of almost passing out. No small pains at all, I don't know where you got that idea.

      Some roller coasters exceed 5g, and few people riding those complain about nausea or small pains. (Of course, people who ride them have usually already done smaller ones, liked them, and are therefore less likely to experience nausea). The only bad effect is the fear of missing out on a part of the wonderful ride by passing out.

      I must say, high G turns are not my favorite part of any roller coaster. I much prefer the low or negative G parts and the inversions. High G's are a necessary evil for some manouevres, as far as I am concerned. But they are certainly never painful.

    71. Re:How nice by michelcolman · · Score: 2

      Have you ever tried riding a big roller coaster? I guess not.

      Swinging your arm around quickly may indeed be slightly painful. But that is a much higher G-force, well above that which would make you lose consciousness. If your arm is 1 meter long, and you are spinning it around at two revolutions per second (I'm sure you can do more than that), the tips will already be experiencing 15g.

      The only ill effects I've had from high G-forces is tiredness and a slight headache afterwards, never during the event. I don't think that's an issue in this case, except maybe St.-Peter may have to stock up on asprin tablets.

    72. Re:How nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being intelligent is just realising everything has an endgame, even you.

      I'm surprised most would even contemplate suicide tho. Vegetable or not, even a brain in a jar with some spark of conciousness to me seems better than not existing at all.

    73. Re:How nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A billionaire on life support.

    74. Re:How nice by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      Don't they require special flight suits for that?

    75. Re:How nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nitrogen or helium asphyxiation is painless, quick and readily available.

    76. Re:How nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you're a fucking asshole.

    77. Re:How nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I used to see a lot of failed suicide attempts by gun on rotten.com. No, bullets to the head are not foolproof and are probably quite painful.

    78. Re:How nice by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Maybe. But in Real Life (tm) gunshots to the head are not always fatal. Especially not when fired from a low-power weapon such as a handgun / pistol, even at point blank range.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    79. Re:How nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back in '05 I worked with a guy who had tried this with a .22LR; the bullet entered the skull and ricocheted around causing brain damage but not death. He was rushed to the ER (I imagine it was rather painful) and now cannot walk or speak straight.

    80. Re:How nice by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      Sounds very much like the lethal injection method of capital punishment; I suppose the same method would work if the person _wanted_ to be killed.

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    81. Re:How nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not foolproof. I know someone who cut both of his optical nerves this way but didn't damage anything else.

  4. 10 Gs isn't lethal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plenty of test pilots have survived much, much more. Of course anybody on an asisted suicide ride is nowhere near flight shape. Still, you don't know who is going to survive 10 Gs. To make sure it works, the track should just end on the last hill at 200 feet up, and it should drop you on rocks, roll you through cactus, and then land you on the roof of a pillow factory.

    1. Re:10 Gs isn't lethal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's what the article says:

      "So how exactly does one physically die by rollercoaster? The science behind it is pretty simple: spin fast enough and hard enough and your brain won't get enough oxygen to keep functioning. The vertical rolls of the coaster would essentially create enough centrifugal force on the body that the blood rushes down in the body instead of up to the brain."

      Personally, I think it'd be more fun if they just lifted up the safety bars after the initial climb.

    2. Re:10 Gs isn't lethal by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      The real problem would be the moderately sub-lethal cases:

      According to TFA, the plan is that inertia prevents blood circulation to the brain, starving it of oxygen and inducing death. Unfortunately, there are a lot of increasingly impaired outcomes short of death that depriving the brain of oxygen can give you. Suicide certainly isn't for everyone; but I don't know of anyone who is looking for some serious permanent brain damage...

    3. Re:10 Gs isn't lethal by sjames · · Score: 1

      It's not the peak G load, but the duration that matters. 10Gs without a suit for a few seconds will be a blackout. Go for a minute and it'll be death.

      Test pilots have physical training, G-suits, and a supply of pure oxygen to get them through brief exposures to high Gs.

    4. Re:10 Gs isn't lethal by Klaus_1250 · · Score: 1

      That is either for short amounts of time or with proper equipment (G-Suit). When I flew glider planes, we used to go up to 6.5 -7G and it is really hard work to stay conscience. I have doubts about the elegance and euphoria described though, above 7G things really start to hurt, your nose will be dripping, ear wax will pop out of your ears, ... If you're physically weak, you'll probably have small arteries in your legs burst too due to the increases blood pressure.

      --
      It only takes one man to change the Wisdom of the Crowd to Tyranny of the Masses.
    5. Re:10 Gs isn't lethal by thrillseeker · · Score: 1

      10Gs for one minute shouldn't kill anyone in decent cardiovascular health - the result here would likely be little different than passing out under water from lack of oxygen and being pulled out after one minute - through three minutes or so would likely cause some brain damage. I've personally, ah, enjoyed 9Gs without a g-suit for a full minute - though I did have a great set of g-measles afterwards. The g-suit isn't magic - it gives your muscles something to push against, but you still have to strain. I wouldn't think that having oxygen supplied would make much difference - the GLOC occurs because the blood carrying the oxygen can't get into the brain, at least not without the forced increase in blood pressure that the anti-g technique causes - and as I recall your haemoglobin is nearly saturated with oxygen at normal atmospheric pressure anyway - having more wouldn't do much. When experiencing frequent high-g events I found that my upper body would be sore, such as from working out too hard. The aerospace surgeons taught that the legs were the primary place to strain, which makes some sense as there's probably a good bit of blood there - but it's a long way back to the brain too - so creating a physiological condition in the lower extremities that gave the blood less volume to pool in, i..e. an anti-g strain, made sense. Having a suit to squeeze the upper torso also makes it hard to breathe, but I think there was a later test design that provided some upper torso push - guys who did best at heavy-g were usually strong-torso types. You learned early not to strain too much with the large gluteals, or to do it with the outer portion mostly - or you'd be soaking in the tub that night. Actually, this ride sounds like a great ... thrill ...

    6. Re:10 Gs isn't lethal by sjames · · Score: 1

      Passing out from asphyxiation is significantly different than passing out due to loss of blood flow to the brain. The latter kills much quicker. Actually draining blood from the brain is even more damaging because it loses 100% of it's "reserve" oxygen all at once.

      It is well known that training can increase G tolerance significantly (that's why the training is there). Imagine what yours was like. Now imagine someone who needs help getting out of bed at 1 G doing that. For that matter, imagine the couch potato whose only exercise is the 12 oz curl.

    7. Re:10 Gs isn't lethal by Xtravar · · Score: 1

      Ignoring the oxygen deprivation, I'm not sure anyone riding that coaster would be the same again, anyway.

      --
      Buckle your ROFL belt, we're in for some LOLs.
  5. Big Whoop! by Niedi · · Score: 1

    This Julijonas Urbonas must be Le Chuck in disguise.....
    Only sad he left out the lava thingie to cut the costs.

  6. How is that humane? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and where exactly is the "elegance and euphoria"?

  7. Elegance and Euphoria? by gregfortune · · Score: 1

    I used to have nightmares that played out almost exactly that way. Also, who's going to test this and tell us they had a good time?

    1. Re:Elegance and Euphoria? by Fned · · Score: 1

      Also, who's going to test this and tell us they had a good time?

      They'll have one of those picture booths at the end, so you can see people's expressions.

    2. Re:Elegance and Euphoria? by dudpixel · · Score: 2

      on the other hand, what if you did actually start to enjoy the beginning of the rollercoaster...and because you were experiencing enjoyment - wanted to change your mind?

      That would suck.

      --
      This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
    3. Re:Elegance and Euphoria? by lupinstel · · Score: 1

      And if that doesn't kill them, the shock that they want to charge $15 for a picture will.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Cthulhu.
  8. Cheaper design: The Drop of Doom by md65536 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have a design for a "ride" that involves a long, slow climb up a large staircase, followed by a massive fall and one strategically placed sidewalk. I think it's the future of euthanasia!

    1. Re:Cheaper design: The Drop of Doom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lmao I thought the same thing, but you put it very nicely, wish I had modpoints to mod you funny.

    2. Re:Cheaper design: The Drop of Doom by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      I thought they used those for abortions?

    3. Re:Cheaper design: The Drop of Doom by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Replace sidewalk with a dumpster, and you'd really have something.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    4. Re:Cheaper design: The Drop of Doom by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Even better...

      Have you ever seen one of those cow-grinders?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    5. Re:Cheaper design: The Drop of Doom by Baloroth · · Score: 1

      Ah, so an actual stairway to heaven, then.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    6. Re:Cheaper design: The Drop of Doom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty much in support of legalizing euthanasia, but... reading about it on Slashdot raises the question of whether if euthanasia were legal, we'd get people doing the software patent trick of patenting suicide methods. "A method for automating delivery through delivery of automatic metal projectile objects through a metal shaft through human skull bones and into human brain tissue using explosive charges."

    7. Re:Cheaper design: The Drop of Doom by EdIII · · Score: 1

      Puhleez. I have the cheapest solution... that eventually makes a profit!

      Suicide Booth. 50c.

      Best part is you can make a ton of them and station them strategically. Like right next to TSA checkpoints, casino entrances, bars, etc.

    8. Re:Cheaper design: The Drop of Doom by gknoy · · Score: 1

      I think it's just an extra long stairway to the ground floor. ;)

    9. Re:Cheaper design: The Drop of Doom by n7ytd · · Score: 1

      Oh, now I understand what Springfield's escalator-to-nowhere was all about!

    10. Re:Cheaper design: The Drop of Doom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've thought about this for a long time, and nothing beats "skydiving without a parachute". Hands down.
      Biggest thrill possible. Truly instant death. Zero risk of "crippled/vegetable survival".

      And you don't have to climb yourself! What a deal! ;)

    11. Re:Cheaper design: The Drop of Doom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've thought about this for a long time, and nothing beats "skydiving without a parachute". Hands down.
      Biggest thrill possible. Truly instant death. Zero risk of "crippled/vegetable survival".

      And you don't have to climb yourself! What a deal! ;)

      http://www.google.com/search?q=Surviving+Skydiving+Without+a+parachute

    12. Re:Cheaper design: The Drop of Doom by Alsee · · Score: 1
      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    13. Re:Cheaper design: The Drop of Doom by slackbheep · · Score: 1

      Thank you for using Stop and Drop, Americas favorite suicide booth since 2008.
      You may find yourself dealing with a competitor who is willing to halve your price.

    14. Re:Cheaper design: The Drop of Doom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This won't get modded but I have to say this post had me rolling on the floor laughing,.. great work!

  9. Old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I've seen this multiple times in the last year already, late much ./?

    1. Re:Old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it's fucking stupid, so I didn't bother..
      They'll just accept any old trash these days won't they..

  10. Humane? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure a high-powered death-coaster is going to qualify as "humane" for anybody who isn't a bit of an adrenaline junky prior to their planned demise.

    It lacks some of the sculptural potential; but I have to imagine that there are dozens to hundreds of possibilities taken from the anesthesiologists' "Don't do this or the patient will die." course that are at least as euphoric, quite as lethal, and not so disquieting to the inner ear...

  11. So... by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 3, Funny

    If you're in a wheelchair, do they let you jump to the front of the line?

    --

    How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    1. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but they will probably let you wheel yourself there.

    2. Re:So... by Taty'sEyes · · Score: 1

      Is it wrong to have found that funny?

      --
      We show geeks how to get their dream girl at EyesOfOdessa.com
    3. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're in a wheelchair, do they let you jump to the front of the line?

      Sure. But if you can actually jump, they send you back to the end of the line.

  12. Something the academic forgot by Dunbal · · Score: 2

    Who is going to clean up all the excrement when death-induced sphincter relaxation occurs in conjunction with high G's? Eww, I don't want to ride on that - regular coasters are bad enough.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    1. Re:Something the academic forgot by decipher_saint · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's funny not a single person who rode it had any complaints after the experience.

      --
      crazy dynamite monkey
    2. Re:Something the academic forgot by DataDiddler · · Score: 1

      One word: Depends.

      --
      Working...
    3. Re:Something the academic forgot by mevets · · Score: 1

      The research was funded by Health Care death panels, they don't quite have it sorted out yet...

    4. Re:Something the academic forgot by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      Those would have to be some super strong depends to contain the poo at 10Gs.

    5. Re:Something the academic forgot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly the solution is to pack them in coffins first and end the coaster at a conveniently-located cemetery. No clean-up necessary, just drop them in the ground and load up the next batch (though someone would need to verify death, safety first). I doubt they would have more than one rider at a time anyway, so you could design the ride around a tricked-out coffin (Profit!) and plan a ceremony around the event. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have a screenplay to write. "In a world where amusement parks are run by undertakers..."

    6. Re:Something the academic forgot by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      On what?

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    7. Re:Something the academic forgot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're going to be dead in a few minutes. What do you care?

    8. Re:Something the academic forgot by DataDiddler · · Score: 1

      Let's assume a massive dump is on the order of three pounds. At ten G's, that would weigh thirty pounds. Since toddlers have been known to hang from their diapers, I'm assuming it can be done. If not, research will need to be done to make a stronger 10G diaper. Even if the deathercoaster is never build, with the rise of space tourism, more people will be going into space in high G environments; oldsters make up a percentage of the population, so it's a good guess that some will be going into space -- thus creating a demand for 10G diapers.

      Wait... I'm going to patent that. Everyone disregard this message

      --
      Working...
    9. Re:Something the academic forgot by MiniMike · · Score: 1

      Simple solution- after the last loop, take a detour through the log flume ride. No one will notice the difference in water quality.

    10. Re:Something the academic forgot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends

      On what?

      On some asshole.

    11. Re:Something the academic forgot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too late, my wife is a senior manager at the company that makes that brand. First to file, bitch!

    12. Re:Something the academic forgot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can religious leaders get group rates?

    13. Re:Something the academic forgot by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Well, I figure the restraints would pop up, it'd go through a corkscrew track to clear out the bodies, and then a live steam pressure wash before coming around for the next load. Ooooh, nice warm seats!

      I see Helpers armed with tasers ready to stun and remove anyone in line who gets hysterical, and loudspeakers with elevator music and a calming voice telling them how much fun it's going to be. The last couple of cars would be reserved for stunned protesters.

      But if the government manages it, half the time it won't make it up the ramp or it'll get stuck upside-down in the first loop. The ride would stop every half hour for contractual coffee breaks. Before the first year of service is up, it'll be discovered that the metalwork was skimped so the manufacturer could pocket some extra cash (after splitting it with a couple senators as part of the cost of doing business) and the whole thing will be condemned and abandoned. The government will go back to gas chambers.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    14. Re:Something the academic forgot by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Simpler idea. No underpants, and they sit on a little toilet-like thing. G forces push it right into the collection bin :P

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    15. Re:Something the academic forgot by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      Just make the roller-coaster carriage launch off the end of the track into a open pit land fill. Problem solved, and it would be a spectacular site to see. You could charge admission.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    16. Re:Something the academic forgot by k31 · · Score: 1

      ...not even the ones who got on by accident,
      thinking it is just a normal coaster.

    17. Re:Something the academic forgot by EdIII · · Score: 1

      Welllll..... isn't that what illegal immigrants are for? To "take" all the jobs we don't want to do?

      Trust me. Whatever job you can come up with, there is somebody willing to take it. Cleaning up excrement is a job that does not even require a high school degree, which means that over a 3rd of our young people already qualify for it, and won't be able to qualify for much more.

      Pride does not feed a family. There will be both men and women that will take that job, because at the end of the day and a hot shower, they can feed their children.

      P.S - I am being sarcastic about the immigrants. Just a disclaimer for the sarcastically challenged out there.

    18. Re:Something the academic forgot by mazarin5 · · Score: 1

      Worse than that, if any gets loose it could have a range of up to a kilometer!

      --
      Fnord.
    19. Re:Something the academic forgot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see Helpers armed with tasers ready to stun and remove anyone in line who gets hysterical, and loudspeakers with elevator music and a calming voice telling them how much fun it's going to be. The last couple of cars would be reserved for stunned protesters.

      Fuck elevator music and calming voices. This idea demands appropriate music. I suggest Iggy and the Stooges's Death Trip. Not only is it musically and lyrically apropos, it's also about the right age to be suitably nostalgic for typical candidates.

    20. Re:Something the academic forgot by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Just a disclaimer for the sarcastically challenged out there.

      That's pretty much the whole internet.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    21. Re:Something the academic forgot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? I thought it was funded by insurance companies looking for a "generic alternative" to long-term illness treatments.

    22. Re:Something the academic forgot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As they say,

      just because no one complains, doesn't mean that all parachutes are perfect.

    23. Re:Something the academic forgot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny not a single person who rode it had any complaints after the experience.

      You didn't have the unpleasant experience of selling tickets to Mr. Kent. I swear, he must have gotten on that ride fifty times, and he did nothing but complain. Funny thing too, every time he rode, the coaster would have a mechanical breakdown just before it was about to put all of the passengers "to sleep". Finally we kicked him out and things started moving again.

    24. Re:Something the academic forgot by Idbar · · Score: 1

      Yet they claim is elegant. I don't see the elegance in sitting in ride full of distasteful experiences from previous riders.

  13. I still prefer going to Carosel by romanval · · Score: 1

    and being 'Renewed'

    1. Re:I still prefer going to Carosel by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      and being 'Renewed'

      AWESOME!!!!!

      For those that didn't get the reference...

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    2. Re:I still prefer going to Carosel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For those that do get it you are over 30.

        Run !!!!!

    3. Re:I still prefer going to Carosel by berashith · · Score: 1

      SANCTUARY

    4. Re:I still prefer going to Carosel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MOD PARENT UP!!!!! And watch "Logan's Run"!!!

  14. Horrible way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that sounds like a horrible way to go. The loops will basically try to rip your internals apart. and the first loop doesnt appear to be enough to do it. so you could potentially be in sever pain for 40 or 50 seconds. Presumable there are also folks that could survive. End up at the bottom crushed bleeding internally, but still alive.

    captcha: "outlive" nice

  15. Business as usuall... by LoyalOpposition · · Score: 1

    I hope it receives regular safety inspections, and they shut the ride down if it gets too worn.

    ~Loyal

    --
    I aim to misbehave.
  16. Change of Heart in the Death Spiral? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What if the euphoria results in such joy that one sees all the reasons to live, thus resulting in a change of heart? Or would that be a change of mind? Is there a Stop button or is the Start button actually a Stop button? This is confusing, so I say build it and see what happens. That will clear up the confusion.

  17. Cleanup by mitchplanck · · Score: 1

    I'd hate to be on the crew which has to remove the people at the end and do cleanup. Will the riders be required to wear diapers?

    1. Re:Cleanup by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Just have it continue upside down of some lava, then open up the safety cage.

      This solves clean up, and removes any worries about possible survivors.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  18. The Devastator by MrEricSir · · Score: 1

    The DEVASTATOR. Only at Thrill World!
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fU14VqcPIDo

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
  19. Fitting advertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anybody else seeing an ad for Roller Coaster Creator in the top right of the Slashdot page?

    1. Re:Fitting advertisement by sunderland56 · · Score: 1

      Anybody else seeing an ad for Roller Coaster Creator in the top right of the Slashdot page?

      Yes. Very fitting.

      The roller coaster simulator at Epcot Centre (where you designed a roller coaster on a SGI box, and then rode your design in a full-motion simulator) had a software check that warned you if you exceeded safe G-limits (something about not wanting to kill their customers). Maybe, for an extra fee, Disney could remove that software override? Much easier to off yourself in a simulator than having to build a real roller coaster.

      In any case - isn't Futurama's "Suicide Booth" a much more reasonable solution?

  20. Wrong Age / Wrong Target Market by Dragon+Bait · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Obviously this is just a [stupid] publicity stunt, but most of the people that I know that would (would have) opted for euthanasia were elderly. They wouldn't be the type to board a roller coaster.

    They do need an option that is better than putting a gun to the head.

    1. Re:Wrong Age / Wrong Target Market by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      It's a bit dark to think about, but perhaps some terminally ill children might opt for euthanasia, and they would be the right age group for this kind of thing.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    2. Re:Wrong Age / Wrong Target Market by syousef · · Score: 1

      It's a bit dark to think about, but perhaps some terminally ill children might opt for euthanasia, and they would be the right age group for this kind of thing.

      They're not in a position, legally or morally, to understand what they're doing and give consent to end their lives.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    3. Re:Wrong Age / Wrong Target Market by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Put them on a planet spinning at the speed of sound, going around in circles until they die.

      Oh wait...

    4. Re:Wrong Age / Wrong Target Market by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "They do need an option that is better than putting a gun to the head."

      Massive Opiate Overdose.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    5. Re:Wrong Age / Wrong Target Market by LateArthurDent · · Score: 1

      Obviously this is just a [stupid] publicity stunt, but most of the people that I know that would (would have) opted for euthanasia were elderly. They wouldn't be the type to board a roller coaster.

      Heh...tell that to the over 70 group skydiving at my dropzone.

      If you're the type of person that enjoyed roller coasters when you were young, you're the type of person that enjoys them when you're old. I still think this is a horrible idea, but not for the same reason you do. Roller coasters are fun, sustained 10G loops that kill you are not, that's just uncomfortable and painful.

      They do need an option that is better than putting a gun to the head.

      I agree with you there.

    6. Re:Wrong Age / Wrong Target Market by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      That'd work if the planet was a lot smaller.

    7. Re:Wrong Age / Wrong Target Market by LateArthurDent · · Score: 1

      It's a bit dark to think about, but perhaps some terminally ill children might opt for euthanasia, and they would be the right age group for this kind of thing.

      They're not in a position, legally or morally, to understand what they're doing and give consent to end their lives.

      On the one hand, I sympathize with your argument, it rings true. On the other hand, I can't help but wonder if anyone else is in position, morally, to deny them the option (obviously there's no choice legally). Forcing a child to die slowly of something like cancer sounds just as bad, perhaps worse.

    8. Re:Wrong Age / Wrong Target Market by rthille · · Score: 1

      So their parents, or the state should decide for them?

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    9. Re:Wrong Age / Wrong Target Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously this is just a [stupid] publicity stunt, but most of the people that I know that would (would have) opted for euthanasia were elderly. They wouldn't be the type to board a roller coaster.

      They do need an option that is better than putting a gun to the head.

      Gas chambers are far more humane, and like a roller coaster, they can hold dozens at a time.

    10. Re:Wrong Age / Wrong Target Market by physicsphairy · · Score: 1

      The elderly? No, sir, from what I've heard, this ride is meant for youth in Asia.

    11. Re:Wrong Age / Wrong Target Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dignitas_%28assisted_dying_organisation%29

      You don't even have to be elderly or sick, just sane. That is, a misanthrope with real conviction can do himself in, too.

    12. Re:Wrong Age / Wrong Target Market by PeanutButterBreath · · Score: 1

      According to Wikipedia, roller coasters were first patented in 1885. Most elderly people alive to day probably were the type to ride a roller coaster when they were younger. They may have stopped when they grew out of amusement parks, or perhaps they became worried that they would get hurt. These seem like irrelevant concerns here.

    13. Re:Wrong Age / Wrong Target Market by syousef · · Score: 1

      So their parents, or the state should decide for them?

      The euthanasia debate is complex enough when it is a terminal adult and we can't agree to what to do there. Throw a terminally ill child into the mix and it becomes extremely difficult. The issue of suffering is still there. The potential for various conflict of interests is still there. But now you have a child who has little experience, a shorter life and probably not the maturity to understand what they're doing. Very rough. As a parent I hope I'm never in that position with my children. I'd like to think I'd do the best for them regardless of the consequences to myself but I cannot imagine ending one of my children's lives or allowing anyone to without exhausting every bit of fight I have in me. Fortunately it's all hypothetical - who knows how I'd behave. Sincerely hope I never find out.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    14. Re:Wrong Age / Wrong Target Market by Dragon+Bait · · Score: 1

      According to Wikipedia, roller coasters were first patented in 1885. Most elderly people alive to day probably were the type to ride a roller coaster when they were younger. They may have stopped when they grew out of amusement parks, or perhaps they became worried that they would get hurt. These seem like irrelevant concerns here.

      I used to love roller coaster ... then I started driving mountainous roads too fast and they became boring. Now that I'm even older I find them boring at best, painful at worse (bouncing up and down on the Indiana Jones ride doesn't do my back any favors). Most of the people I see outside of work are in their 80's -- your target audience for a Dr. Jack exit from this world -- and of the ones that have pulled the trigger, all of them were either in chronic, unmanageable pain or had terminal cancer eating them alive (with chemo therapy making them nauseous). I'm confident that none of them would choose a roller coast.

      My preference would be to breathe deeply of carbon monoxide until quietly falling asleep. Failing that, pills would be a good alternative. The gun to the head that my friends have used leaves a significant mess -- and usually takes a lot longer to die than the movies would have you believe (median time of about an hour and half). A specialized death coaster would not be worth the time, effort, or money to build.

    15. Re:Wrong Age / Wrong Target Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do need an option that is better than putting a gun to the head.

      No they don't. They already have options. Furthermore, it is not society's burden to provide people with "better" options for leaving society.

      The only people who society arguably should have to support are the bereaved.

    16. Re:Wrong Age / Wrong Target Market by Dragon+Bait · · Score: 1

      They do need an option that is better than putting a gun to the head.

      No they don't. They already have options. Furthermore, it is not society's burden to provide people with "better" options for leaving society.

      The only people who society arguably should have to support are the bereaved.

      If you're implying that society shouldn't have to pay for it, no problem: charge for the medication (and do not allow insurance to pay for it). Just make it legal.

      If you're implying that a person shouldn't have better means at their disposal then I will say that I sincerely hope that you Mr. Anonymous Coward find yourself in the desperate situation where you are terminally ill. Everyone knows there is no way out other than long months of pain and suffering with the medical community consuming all of your family's resources. I sincerely hope that the only thing that you can grasp is your grandfather's old pistol. And perhaps I am a cold hearted bastard, but I hope that your desperation forces you to pull the trigger and I sincerely hope that the next two hours find you in squirming in the most excruciating pain in your own blood, vomit, and shit. After the paramedics haul your worthless carcass away, given that there was no cleaner way to end your life, your spouse curses your name as she cleans up the mess you left behind. Perhaps then your offspring will have the decency to allow a legal, clean, and effective solution.

    17. Re:Wrong Age / Wrong Target Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has been one for quite a while:

      https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Suicide_bag

    18. Re:Wrong Age / Wrong Target Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely, it messes up gun crime stats when they self-destruct via firearm.

    19. Re:Wrong Age / Wrong Target Market by rthille · · Score: 1

      My original post (GP of this) was a bit flippant, but more seriously, right now I'm struggling with when/whether to put down my 13+ year old dog. She is basically healthy, but has an issue with her hind end (either the chronic perianal fistulas destroying the nerves, or arthritis) where she can't hardly walk/stand/get up and is incontinent. Oh she's happy enough when I spend time with her, petting and brushing her, but she's obviously suffering at some times and in some ways. When is it 'ok' for me to take her life? As an atheist, I have no recourse to afterlives or doggie (nor human) heaven or hell, but I have the belief/knowledge that she will suffer no longer, ever after. I can't imagine trying to make the decision about a child, but at least I imagine that I'd be better able to communicate with the child (above a certain age) about what their experience of their life was, and so have a better basis for the decision. What I've got with my dog is "sometimes she 'looks happy'".

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    20. Re:Wrong Age / Wrong Target Market by syousef · · Score: 1

      Well I just lost my dog at about 11 1/2 years old. He wasn't a puppy anymore, that's for sure - and for a labrador that always behaved like one that was hard to see. The loss was tough. As best I can tell some kind of heart attack.I was busy out for the day with a young family and put him out in the morning. When he didn't come in after lunch I thought nothing of it - he'd done that before. When I couldn't find him that night I went searching everywhere. He'd collapsed getting off an old couch we have in the back. By the time I found him he was cold and stiff. That was hard to take. But all that is selfish - *I* want him around. When I think of the dog, he still seemed happy a good amount of the time. He'd started having trouble with hip dysplasia so he couldn't jump up on things as easily anymore, and as I said he wasn't a puppy. There was nothing in him screaming "kill me now, I'm in pain". Every animal including humans feel pain as they age. That's natural. So long as there's still some quality of life I'd be in no rush to terminate it.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    21. Re:Wrong Age / Wrong Target Market by gnuotaku · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, opiates alone in overdose aren't guaranteed to be lethal. Some deaths from opiate OD occur because of combined intoxication with benzos or barbituates. A combination of an OD of both an opiate (I'd pick hydromorphone) and a barb should do quite nicely. Interestingly, people who have been revived from opiate OD by narcan have often told off the paramedics for 'harshing their buzz' (implying even in the OD condition they were high as a kite and loving it). If you have to die, personally I'd rather go that way.

  21. Operator Error? by decipher_saint · · Score: 4, Funny

    So if a Carnie screws up, do people survive?

    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
    1. Re:Operator Error? by slydder · · Score: 0

      Woman, 83, survives after Berlin Euthanasian coaster accident
      January 11, 2021|By Charles Williams, AP

      It was supposed to be the final outing for the 83-year-old woman, but a ride on a euthanasia coaster at an indoor Euthanasia park in Berlin proved non-fatal.

        Sandra Leber, 83, survived Sunday night at 7th Heaven while riding a coaster called “Good to the Last Drop”, authorities said.

        The woman, who was seated near the front of the coaster, managed to get her breath between the 2nd and 3rd looping during the ride. According to park director, Markus Baum, such an occurrence has never before happened in the history of the park.

        It is believed the woman met all the requirements for the ride, Baum said.

        Leber is expected to undergo a full physical to confirm that her ill health has not been adversely affected by the incident.

        "It was scary as hell," Leber told reporters. "but I am determined to give it another go as soon as my physician gives me permission. I just can't believe that I actually lived through it is all ... I have noticed that my fear of heights is no longer a problem though."

        "I've never seen anything like it," Baum said. "It was just a day at work like any other and then this. The coaster operator has since handed in his resignation and will be treated for psychological trauma."

        The indoor euthanasia park for the terminally ill has been open about 3 years, Baum said Sunday.

        "I just want to say how tragic this is and how bad I feel for the family," he said. "We're going to 100 percent cooperate with all the various authorities in the investigation."

        He declined to speak about the condition of the coaster.

        The Berlin Department of Health, which regulates euthanasia park rides, dispatched an investigator to immediately after the incident, spokeswoman Anke Strauss said. She declined to speak specifically about the current investigation.

      AP reporter Charles Willams

  22. Soylent green! by Antisyzygy · · Score: 2

    Reminds me of Soylent Green. A pleasant experience followed by death, then your body is liquified and turned into green crackers.

    --
    That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    1. Re:Soylent green! by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      My nauseated cousin in Alabama is a green cracker you insensitive clod!

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    2. Re:Soylent green! by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Much more elegant than those tacky suicide booths.

    3. Re:Soylent green! by quenda · · Score: 1

      Spoiler alert please!
      Not everyone has seen it.

  23. Still kinda messy. by mevets · · Score: 1

    Someone has to drag the corpses out of the roller coaster, and that isn't going to be pretty. I think a nice long free-fall with a parachute programmed to hit an active volcano would be a bit more creative. They get to enjoy a blissful free-fall, gentle descent and quick cremation. Best of all, no mess and no fuss.

    Sounds a bit like 'the solution', perhaps?

    1. Re:Still kinda messy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone has to drag the corpses out of the roller coaster, and that isn't going to be pretty. I think a nice long free-fall with a parachute programmed to hit an active volcano would be a bit more creative. They get to enjoy a blissful free-fall, gentle descent and quick cremation. Best of all, no mess and no fuss.

      Sounds a bit like 'the solution', perhaps?

      Except that, if I understand correctly, you're only supposed to throw virgins into the volcano, to appease the volcano god. Since you don't want to make him angry, how do you check the males for that trait?

    2. Re:Still kinda messy. by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Just end the ride with a trip through the autoclave/cremation furnace, which would serve the dual purpose of removing the biomass (read: your loved one's nigh liquified remains) and sanitizing the ride for the next run through. I could see this as a viable concept for, say, Silver Dollar City, considering their typical demographic. Hand-blown glass cremation urns, anyone?

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    3. Re:Still kinda messy. by itchythebear · · Score: 1

      you're only supposed to throw virgins into the volcano[...]how do you check the males for that trait?

      Check their browser history and see how often the visit slashdot.

      --
      If what I just said sounded like a troll, it was probably just a failed attempt at humor.
    4. Re:Still kinda messy. by somersault · · Score: 1

      You have to have a registered Slashdot account.

      I think the parachute bit is a bad idea. Just freefall straight into the volcano, or you'd end up cooking uncomfortably before you actually died.. actually, the heat from the volcano would probably also make it pretty difficult to get the 'chute down into the lava..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    5. Re:Still kinda messy. by Sancho · · Score: 1

      That's an option for people with a brain cloud.

    6. Re:Still kinda messy. by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      If you're going to use a volcano, why not fly barely operable DC8s destined for the scrapyard full of candidates into it, and then nuke the volcano to be sure?

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    7. Re:Still kinda messy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I have no response to that."

    8. Re:Still kinda messy. by AmbushBug · · Score: 1

      Yeah, sounds great! Except for the burning at the end after the "gentle descent"....

    9. Re:Still kinda messy. by camperdave · · Score: 1

      I think a nice long free-fall with a parachute programmed to hit an active volcano would be a bit more creative.

      Sounds like a waste of a good parachute.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    10. Re:Still kinda messy. by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      If you're going to use a volcano, why not fly barely operable DC8s destined for the scrapyard full of candidates into it, and then nuke the volcano to be sure?

      Too many thetans with bad engrams.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    11. Re:Still kinda messy. by Ster · · Score: 1

      That's an option for people with a brain cloud.

      Never mod points when I need them! :-(

      Joe Versus the Volcano

      -Ster

    12. Re:Still kinda messy. by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      What if the parachute catches the hot air in the crater, and gets pushed back out again? (I don't know if this is possible, but I like the idea.)

      In any case, I wouldn't want to descend gently into a pit of lava. I'd want to hit it as fast as I possible could.

  24. I prefer this... by M0j0_j0j0 · · Score: 1

    i think this is more human.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANwF2mDuOYw

  25. Good for the Target Demo of ~2 People by W.+Justice+Black · · Score: 1

    For everyone else, it's:

    1. Get on coaster.
    2. Break a hip/rib; dislocate a shoulder on turn 1.
    3. Be in horrible, horrible pain until passing out from pain and/or dying from acceleration.

    Awesome. I wouldn't even call this a nice thought experiment--it's just stupid.

    --
    "Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana." --Groucho Marx
    1. Re:Good for the Target Demo of ~2 People by Ardyvee · · Score: 1

      You're supposed to lose part of your consciousness (or even die?) during the first turn, besides, considering the speed -- it's not like it would be too much time in pain.

      --
      I don't care if I'm wrong. I only care about everyone obtaining something from the discussion.
  26. Photos by itchythebear · · Score: 1

    How long until they try to sell overpriced souvenir photos to the family?

    --
    If what I just said sounded like a troll, it was probably just a failed attempt at humor.
    1. Re:Photos by EdIII · · Score: 1

      LOL. That would be perfect.

      Guest: Wow. Nice living room. Love the family pictures above the fireplace.... what the fuck....
      Family Member: Ohh, that's old Grampa Joe.
      Guest: He does not look like he is having a lot of fun.
      Family Member: Don't worry, it did not last that long.
      Guest: Thank god. Where is he now?
      Family Member: The urn right next to the photo.

    2. Re:Photos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I lold

      +1 to you sir

  27. i wish i had mod points by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

    well-played. I suggest downloading "StairDismount" and "TruckDismount", if you can still find those. Consider them euthanasia simulators.

    --
    -Clio
    Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
    Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    1. Re:i wish i had mod points by need4mospd · · Score: 1

      Just downloaded the stair dismount app on android. jet.ro is the website with the original games.

    2. Re:i wish i had mod points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOVED THOSE GAMES! The fact that they were freeware and I was a kid with no money probably factored into it, but I really just couldn't stop watching skull crushing collisions. The only thing that was missing was blood.

  28. Euthanasia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A new roller coaster for youth in asia? Is this something China is doing, to deal with unwanted daughters?

  29. Joke by gurps_npc · · Score: 2
    This is obviously a bit of a joke, and not even that funny. I like the original version better:

    I want to die in my sleep, like my grandfather. Not screaming in terror like the people in the back seat of his car.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:Joke by kermidge · · Score: 1

      You can maybe find the original in rec.humor.funny from circa '90; it may also be in the classics section at http://www.netfunny.com/rhf/

      If memory serves, it's:

      When I die, I want to go peacefully, in my sleep, like my Grandfather.
      Not screaming, like the passengers in his car.

      I read this back then, about three in the morning, from feed excerpts provided by Darlah on the ST-RT at GEnie. For the next few hours, as I moseyed about in the RT, I chortled every time I though of it. To this day, when I tell it to someone, it's a struggle not to burst out laughing before the end. YMMV

    2. Re:Joke by sheddd · · Score: 1

      I like Tyrion's version better:

      Shaggar: How would you like to die, Tyrion, son of Tywin?
      Tyrion: "In my own bed, at the age of 80, with a belly full of wine and a girls mouth around my c**k."

  30. 10 G by SYSS+Mouse · · Score: 1

    I wonder if the coaster car can withstand such force without breaking apart.

    1. Re:10 G by cornface · · Score: 1

      Does it really matter if it can't?

    2. Re:10 G by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Obviously if it falls apart every time it'll get real expensive real quick.

      Also, if it falls apart too soon, you'll have people with severe injuries, but still alive.

    3. Re:10 G by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like the aircraft that can do it?
       
      Or the rockets, or the spaceshuttle?

      No, I'm sure they can't make a roller coaster that can withstand 10G.

    4. Re:10 G by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as the cars are cheap to rebuild, does it really matter?

  31. on suicide bombers by Hazel+Bergeron · · Score: 1

    I had always imagined that the most euphoric way to die would be fulfilling some religious or quasi-religious mission. So if you hype yourself up to, say, mass killing for your cause and the prospect of a glorious afterlife, the seconds before you hit the detonator must feel wonderful.

    Fortunately, I'm not a thrill-seeker, I don't like killing people, and - most importantly of all - I don't think random attacks on civilians for political causes are likely to be effective. Especially not since the IRA has moved on and the US propaganda machine tells the world to dislike the current crop of boogeymen.

    1. Re:on suicide bombers by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Back when I was younger and more emo I thought that way too. I could never decide on what would be the best target though: a mosque? a church? the stock exchange? parliament house? an embassy?

      Needless to say I never tried it...

    2. Re:on suicide bombers by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      the US propaganda machine tells the world to dislike the current crop of boogeymen

      Right, because until the US said otherwise, the Taliban were actually well liked for burning teachers alive, killing mothers for teaching their daughters to read or for working to feed their families since their husbands were shot for listening to music or having the wrong beard length. And when they strap explosives onto mentally challenged young women and send them into a vegetable market to kill other women and children, that was really quite OK and euphoric and whatnot until the US started calling it bad.

      Oh, I get it, you were joking.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    3. Re:on suicide bombers by Hazel+Bergeron · · Score: 1

      Right, because until Thatcher said otherwise, the IRA were actually well liked for burning civilians alive, killing mothers for teaching their daughters to interpret an old book a particular way or for working to feed their families since their husbands were shot for walking down the wrong road or visiting the wrong priest. And when they go cap in hand to clueless ex-pats in the US to collect money to fund their operations, that was really quite OK and euphoric and whatnot until Thatcher started calling it bad.

      Yep, I was joking: what worked in the UK wasn't Thatcher's propaganda (for either side), but Labour's willingness to listen and to negotiate (for both). Extremism is what happens when desperate people fail by moderate means.

    4. Re:on suicide bombers by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Extremism is what happens when desperate people fail by moderate means

      No, extremism is people thinking that visiting the wrong priest is bad, or that teaching your daughter to read is bad.

      A government "willing to listen" didn't make the IRA finally settle down. In fact, you'll notice that it was the attacks of 9/11 that actually played a big role in the IRA realizing that they were behaving like asshats.

      People willing to kill other people over religious differences is their own problem of cultural and personal immaturity. The shocks to the system and condemnation by fellow citizens that have helped in the UK (in that regard) have not happened to sufficient numbers in large swaths of the middle east. Millions of people there still think the Taliban's cultural objectives (a mysoginistic, medieval theocracy armed with Pakistan's nukes and what's left of the region's oil) are just fine. And there's the problem.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    5. Re:on suicide bombers by Hazel+Bergeron · · Score: 1

      9/11 caused the IRA to "realize they were behaving like asshats"? Yours is the most sophomoric, US-centric explanation of the end of the Troubles I have ever heard.

      And I'd rather the freedom of 15 years ago plus the hassle of an occasional bomb warning than the hell the US government has pushed the West into over the last decade. How old are you?

    6. Re:on suicide bombers by ScentCone · · Score: 0

      How old are you?

      Old enough to recall watching lots of BBC news coverage of exactly the sort of thing I'm talking about. Obviously there was more going on than just the sudden change in tone in the IRA's communications and actions immediately after 9/11, but if you're trying to pretend that didn't happen, you're being incredibly disengenuous.

      I realize you'd prefer periodic random killings than preventing them, since you haven't been personally inconvenienced by having your own family blow up for believing in the wrong flavor omnipotent imaginary friend. But the stuff they do in London to try to prevent another couple of trains from being giant Allah-powered meat grinders isn't about the IRA.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    7. Re:on suicide bombers by Hazel+Bergeron · · Score: 1

      Old enough to recall watching lots of BBC news

      So no actual experience or academic study of the IRA or the Middle East crisis?

      Obviously there was more going on than

      Obviously. For example, Adams probably had a cold at some point in the past decade and that also may have affected his performance.

      since you haven't been personally inconvenienced by having your own family blow up

      True, when my dad was working as a civil servant in central London a couple of decades ago it was never worse than a very near miss. Yet neither he nor I felt either anger or cowardice. Hell, my father was born in the middle of a civil war which tore families apart (and killed quite a few of them!) and he can still speak in a balanced manner about the grievances of both sides.

      And a friend of my ex who worked at that funny shaped building in NOVA... turns out he didn't go in until later that day so he had a lucky miss too! Not really sure how he felt, but my ex's response was to castigate US policy in the Middle East and to campaign even harder for peace.

      America is full of children. Wide-eyed, enthusiastic, often bright and sometimes hard-working. But children.

    8. Re:on suicide bombers by BeerCat · · Score: 1

      "Obviously there was more going on than just the sudden change in tone in the IRA's communications and actions immediately after 9/11"

      Seriously? You think that a bunch of Saudi extremists in 2001 made a bunch of Northern Irish extremists think again about what they had been doing?

      Changes started happening with things like the Good Friday Agreement - in 1998 (and events that made even that possible predated that by a number of years)

      --
      "She's furniture with a pulse"
    9. Re:on suicide bombers by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Just to be clear, then: you think that it's one or more US policies in the middle east that actually causes the Taliban to choose their specific cultural objectives, espcially as it relates to killing those who support frivalities like literate children? Let's skip the whole Christian sectarian violence thing in your neck of the woods for the moment, since you seem to think that both sides were right and just needed a sympathetic ear to stop killing each other.

      Let's just focus on which US foreign policity element, specifically, drives large numbers of retrograde Islamist-types to slaughter fellow Muslims because they want to vote for the mayor of their own little town in Afghanistan. Are you sure they're not just still really mad about the remaining traces of the atmosphere of smug condescension they recall from previous rule by the British?

      Regardless, your point is that a guy running the local Taliban franchise will - after you've given him a kind ear - decide that perhaps, after all, girls should be allowed to read and write after all? Is the issue that he just needs to hear you say that their problem is they're not looking at things in a "balanced manner?" That guy thinks that there can be no balance with someone who defies his holy marching orders, and he's willing to shoot women in the back of the head on the town's soccer field in order to make his point about ... what? The evils of US-inspired devilry like reading? What words would you have for him, that would uncloud his mind - fogged as it is by "US policy" about ... what? Literacy? Democracy? And out of curiosity, when did the UK become so "balanced" that it decided those things were no more important than the local thugocracy's ideas of medieval bliss? When did odious moral relativism become the adult position to strive for?

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    10. Re:on suicide bombers by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      You think that a bunch of Saudi extremists in 2001 made a bunch of Northern Irish extremists think again about what they had been doing?

      No, I think that incredibly intense world-wide scrutiny and broadly re-invigorated condemnation of organizations that embraced blowing up civilian targets for the sake of blowing them up in order to shock people into liking and supporting their cause ... had an immediate impact on their tone, and solidified a lot of otherwise not-fully-baked political agreements.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    11. Re:on suicide bombers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do know you are arguing with Harrison's retarded sister? The one that needed no handicaps?

    12. Re:on suicide bombers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to post as AC. Don't worry I'm fine.

    13. Re:on suicide bombers by Warwick+Allison · · Score: 1

      Hmm... interesting... so all we need to do is find a WWJD version of religious suicide and we can clean up the whole Christian Right with no mess. How about a magical potion that when you drink it, you die, but you'll be catapulted to Heaven by the simultaneous but opposite reaction from the 10 nearest gay men going straight to Hell (it even says so on the bottle). Be sure to pay an Atheist to look after your dog too...

    14. Re:on suicide bombers by Hazel+Bergeron · · Score: 1

      Happy men would have no interest in signing up to the Taliban, and the Taliban would never reach the critical mass required to strongly encourage[tm] other men to join.

      So, yes, the problem is that once reasonable men were not listened to - and they're still not being listened to. So they find a group which is willing to give them some form of power.

      Also, you ought to leave whatever backwater swamp you're floating in and visit Europe once in a while. Macho countries like Spain have spent the last couple of decades going through a very heavy period of acknowledging just how widespread domestic violence is against women even in the West. Anglo-Saxon countries haven't reached this epiphany that unhappy people can be right bastards to those even weaker. And it's nothing to do with religion and everything to do with the same reason rape tends to happen: the unsatisfied seeking some flavour of power.

    15. Re:on suicide bombers by Hazel+Bergeron · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? The IRA didn't bomb London to "shock people into liking" them. It bombed London because it wanted to make people listen and/or to deliver what it perceived as retribution.

      Although "WE'LL BOMB THEM UNTIL THEY LIKE US!" seems to have been ostensible US military philosophy since the '70s. Perhaps it's rubbed off on you?

      (Dammit, have I been (out-)trolled?)

    16. Re:on suicide bombers by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      You are confusing individual idiocy with a regime that explicitly calls for the establishment of a newly entrenched, wider culture where brutality (against women, etc.) is celebrated, and is the norm. Denying girls the ability to read isn't the symptom of frustrated (and well financed!) men out of Pakistan, it's their stated purpse.. Whatever moorish leftovers in Span are finally shaking loose at the individual level, is it really your contention that SUVs full of AK-47-carrying beard police - acting as paid agents of the regime - who shoot people for playing music ... that's the same sort of thing? Are you that morally rudderless, that you can't see one thing waning, and another waxing?

      Why do you suppose there are so many frustrated young men in the middle east? Are they frustrated because troops are there to prevent people from being killed at polling places, or frustrated because their own countrymen send drugged suicide bombers to the polls to kill them, rather than have their voices heard? Are they frustrated over their lack of economic prosperity? Sure. Do they understand that the medieval mind-set and culture of death in groups like the Taliban are exactly why it's impossible for a moden economy to take hold where they live?

      This isn't about "being listened to," no matter how many times you say that. The entire world is there listening to the middle east all day, every day. This is about education and the stabilizing effect of a rational rule of law administered by a representative government. Without those two things, the theocratic murderers are the only ones running the show.

      And ... nothing to do with religion? Really? Religion provides the entire premise - the complete supporting world view - for the actions of these groups, and it is the grip that primitive mysticism and religious ferver have on the uneducated minds in the region that give the religious leaders of these groups their only claims to the authority they invoke when they direct one Muslim to go and kill another one in the name of fending off modernity.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  32. Death trap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's nothing compared to the death traps I made on Roller Coaster Tycoon 1

  33. G-force does not cause euphoria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure it kills but it's incredibly painful and stressful up until you pass out. Anybody go on a roller coaster to relax and unwind?

  34. Terrible Headline Department by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

    This roller coaster has not been created. It is has been proposed. This is a slight difference there.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  35. Why.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. would I want to subject myself to that when there are painless ways to do it?

    Note: Designer. Not someone who would actually have to build, run, use, fix, or clean up such a thing.

  36. there's a lot easier (and cheaper) way, you know.. by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 1

    just have the person OD on recreational drugs of some type.

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
  37. Wah Wah Wah by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    I bet this ride would be huge with young people in the far east.

  38. Surely... by Haedrian · · Score: 1

    The best euthanasia would be being trampled to death by a harem of attractive woman.

    Might need something work for women and people who don't like women; and its not as painless, but it'll be awesome.

    1. Re:Surely... by NitroWolf · · Score: 1

      The best euthanasia would be being trampled to death by a harem of attractive woman.

      Might need something work for women and people who don't like women; and its not as painless, but it'll be awesome.

      I'm thinking this is fairly easy to accomplish. Just go marry several attractive women, promise them things their heart desires, gather them all in one room and tell them it was a joke and you married all of them at the same time just to be a dick. I suspect trampling is going to be in your future.

  39. I have a better idea by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    I have an easier and cheaper alternative...once they embark on a roller coaster ride for an attempted suicide, they will go on a small trip on a roller coaster small enough for children to go on, but at random intervals and random locations, you will have specific neck level guillotines (adjustable based on height of the person).

    As the person rides, they will encounter at last second a blade that whips out from nowhere, and slices the head clean off....if the person is willing to go through a roller coaster 1600 miles long, then I guess they are determined as hell to go...so why not make it easier...

    1. Re:I have a better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please take your religious trolling and die in hell fire, please.

    2. Re:I have a better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1600 ft != 1600 miles

  40. Sounds like a great idea... by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

    They can set it up right next to the Tooth Chipper & the Screamatorium!

    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
  41. LOBO by snookerhog · · Score: 1

    anyone else remember the LOBO comic about the suicide theme park?

  42. H-Bomb testing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Had hydrogen bomb testing still been active, placing yourself at the epicenter would make the event painless. Of course, it be better to do this in space where no further harm would occur to others. Perhaps a blaze of glory may be some ritual in the far off distant future.

  43. Really? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    This is what Slashdot has become?
    How to Fix Slashdot.
    1. Bring back Cmdr Taco
    2. Fire samzenpus.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    1. Re:Really? by craash420 · · Score: 1

      You forgot two important steps:

      3. ???
      4. PROFIT!

      --
      Extra medication for all!
    2. Re:Really? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I have a bold idea.
      3. Integrity
      4. PROFIT!

      It is really sad but I think I see Slashdot rotting a little bit each day.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  44. That must be... by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

    "Lithuanian amusement park worker and current PhD candidate in London's Royal College of Art's Design Interactions department, Julijonas Urbonas,

    ... one hell of a commute.

  45. Humane? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do not think this word means what you think it means.

  46. Re:there's a lot easier (and cheaper) way, you kno by DarkTempes · · Score: 1

    Or a simple inert gas like Nitrogen? Which should give the same euphoria as well...

  47. Not good for everyone... by pinqkandi · · Score: 1

    Well, for me this wouldn't work, because roller coasters activate my hyper-barf reflex. So, not only would I know I'm about to die, I'd be getting covered in my own vomit in the process.

  48. Nitrogen Asphyxiation by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

    Nitrogen asphyxiation is probably the best way to go. The body doesn't realize when it's running out of oxygen. It only senses a high level of carbon dioxide. Therefore, inhaling only nitrogen will result in death but there won't be any gasping or discomfort because the body thinks that everything is just groovy.

    --
    A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    1. Re:Nitrogen Asphyxiation by vonhammer · · Score: 2

      This is very similar to to what some rebreather divers have done by accident. Turn off the oxygen supply (or forget to turn it on) while keeping the CO2 scrubber working. The N2 levels build, the O2 levels drop, no CO2 to cause respiratory distress and a gentle fade off into death.

  49. Wow. by Caerdwyn · · Score: 1

    Wow, there are people here actually taking this seriously. For those people I have a bridge, some prime bottom-land in Louisiana, a derivative-based mutual fund, and homeopathic medicine to sell you.

    For the rest of us: Bah! This is old news! John Cleese had a better proposal. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2PyeXRwhCE

    --
    Everybody gets what the majority deserves.
    1. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking more along the lines of this Python sketch as a better proposal: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MLctf4o6feQ

  50. Idea is not original by doomtiki · · Score: 1

    I made the same thing in Roller Coaster Tycoon last week, but the intended goal was murder, not euthanasia.

  51. I Wanna Get Off! by blackfrancis75 · · Score: 1

    What do they do if people have an epiphany in the first couple of minutes of the ride and want to live? Ejector seats?

  52. Warnings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess this would be the only roller coaster without "Keep your arms and legs inside the car" and "Do not ride if you have a bad heart/stomach/brain/back condition" warning. I guess the only restriction would be "one ride ticket per customer".

  53. No, Mr. Bond... by dorianh49 · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, Mr. Bond... I expect you to ride.

    --
    Gravity is a contributing factor in nearly 73 percent of all accidents involving falling objects. -Dave Barry
  54. How do you get a Ph.D. for this? by swan5566 · · Score: 1

    'He considers this research in "Gravitational Aesthetics."' Really? "Research" in a topic you just make up? It appears that this art department doesn't have any problem allowing gratuitous language to give motivation for what they do.

    --
    In debates about Christianity, there are two groups: those looking for answers, and those looking to just ask questions.
  55. If you survive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    do you get a free ride?

  56. Inert gases are the way to go by Aguazul · · Score: 1

    Yes, inert gases are the way to go. That would be my choice for suicide. Carbon dioxide is no good because your lungs know that isn't healthy, but there are inert gas mixes that the body doesn't react to. You feel fine, then a little giddy, then you start getting high and hallucinating, then you pass out. If oxygen isn't provided, you'll be dead in a few minutes. There was a programme on UK TV about this -- I can't remember who by, though -- some politician.

    1. Re:Inert gases are the way to go by DamienNightbane · · Score: 5, Funny

      Helium would be the best choice. All the effectiveness of nitrogen, but with the added benefit of the person's last moments being hilarious to any onlookers.

    2. Re:Inert gases are the way to go by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Also easily obtained. Most large department stores sell it, for purposes of party balloons.

      Just make sure you get real helium. It's very expensive, so a lot of those tanks contain 'balloon gas' - helium diluted with air, to make it cheaper. Just about enough helium to float. I don't know if it's enough oxygen to sustain life or not, but it'd be very humiliating if the suicide attempt ended with only brain damage.

    3. Re:Inert gases are the way to go by treeves · · Score: 1

      Or sulfur hexafluoride, for hilarity in a basso profundo sort of way. Deep thoughts for your dying words accompanied by a deep voice.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    4. Re:Inert gases are the way to go by slackbheep · · Score: 1

      Another poster referenced the show you're thinking of above. It was an episode of Horizon with the title "How to Kill a Human Being " if I recall correctly.

  57. Wow... by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

    Where was this guy when Hitler needed him?

    --
    That is all.
  58. Nigerian Euthanasia Hotline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many believe there is actually a euthanasia hotline

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-14938984

    Call 09141, and wait to be called back...

  59. One Word by II+Xion+II · · Score: 1

    Laxatives

  60. Lithuania testing ground by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lithuania is Europes testing ground for devestating IMF policy. They where screwed out of thier agricultural real wealth, now advised to be a knowledge economy, close hospitals, have elite and make euro's so important. Find a preppy girl to suggest what is an economic good idea : get rid of old people..

  61. uuhh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't this come out like a year ago?

    I specifically remembering reading about this before.

  62. Splat! by theswade · · Score: 1

    I hope the seats double as toilets cuz this is gonna be messy!

  63. This is all nice and well, by BLAG-blast · · Score: 1

    but is it safe?

    --
    M0571y H@rml355.
  64. Re:there's a lot easier (and cheaper) way, you kno by demonlapin · · Score: 1

    Recreational drugs - even nitrous oxide - don't produce euphoria via anoxia. Breathing pure nitrogen would probably be exactly like breathing air except you pass out.

  65. The Architects Sketch! The Architects Sketch! by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    The guests arrive in the entrance hall here, are carried along the corridor on a conveyor belt in extreme comfort and past murals depicting Mediterranean scenes, towards the rotating knives. The last twenty feet of the corridor are heavily soundproofed. The blood pours down these chutes and the mangled flesh slurps into these large containers. None of your blood caked on the walls and flesh flying out of the windows inconveniencing passers-by with this one.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    1. Re:The Architects Sketch! The Architects Sketch! by aberkvam · · Score: 1

      Excuse me. Did you say "knives"?

    2. Re:The Architects Sketch! The Architects Sketch! by CreationLtd · · Score: 1

      Rotating knives, yes.

    3. Re:The Architects Sketch! The Architects Sketch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you proposing to slaughter our tenants?

  66. The right way to go... by joh · · Score: 1

    is strapping yourself to (or sitting against) a good-sized nuke. With a remote in your hand to fire it. As soon as you do that you will be vaporized before anything happening even reaches your nerves, much less your brain. One moment you're there, the next you're just vapor as part of a rapidly expanding mushroom cloud.

    A bit messy in a way, though.

  67. Carousel by bobaferret · · Score: 1

    I think a Carousel would be more fitting. Maybe with a bright red light at the top, and electric zappy things, and can we wear masks?

  68. Uggg by Maury+Markowitz · · Score: 1

    Why is this making it to the front page?

  69. Phd??? by Device666 · · Score: 1

    I want to suggest it's designer with the Phd takes it first himself for a testdrive. And we decide if the test provided sufficient results. All in the name of science of course :p

  70. Death By by mattydont · · Score: 1

    I'd still prefer death by snu snu

    1. Re:Death By by darkwing_bmf · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what I was thinking.

  71. Nitrogen narcosis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's the way to go.

  72. So... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    ...when are we going to see this at Disney World?

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  73. More elegant words fail me by Shoten · · Score: 1

    Dude, that's seriously fucked up.

    --

    For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
  74. Somebody played too much Roller Coaster Tycoon. by wonderboss · · Score: 1

    EOM.

    --
    more cowbell
  75. Er, euphoric? by Jack9 · · Score: 1

    There's nothing euphoric about being CRUSHED. 10gs killing you, does this.

    --

    Often wrong but never in doubt.
    I am Jack9.
    Everyone knows me.
  76. Pulling Gs is unpleasant. by couchslug · · Score: 1

    While I enjoyed getting an "incentive ride" in the F-16D I crewed, I'll observe that Gs themselves aren't pleasant.

    Wanna croak? OD on opiates. A large syringe of Fentanyl should do the trick nicely.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  77. Just like "The Carnival" by Michael Fedo by CaroKann · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of a short story called "The Carnival" by Michael Fedo. I read it in junior high school. It was a good creepy read. I've always thought it would make a good Twilight Zone episode.

  78. Already Been Done Before by SpasticWeasel · · Score: 1
    --
    No sooner do I get over one, then you put a better one right next to me. Bastards.
  79. Credit and forget it by Nkwe · · Score: 1

    Many coaster enthusiasts keep records of all the roller coasters they ride and try to rack up as many different roller coaster "credits" as possible - for no real better reason than bragging rights. "Credit and forget it" is an expression one uses when you ride a kiddy coaster or other unremarkable ride that you just rode to get it on your list. Somehow the expression seems appropriate here.

  80. For capital punishment? by reboot246 · · Score: 1

    Without arguing the right and wrong of it, if this roller coaster method is good enough for euthanasia, is it good enough for capital punishment? Nobody could object using the "cruel and unusual" argument.

    1. Re:For capital punishment? by wiedzmin · · Score: 1

      I think as a method of capital punishment it would be cruel and unusual - it's all fine and dandy to spend 3 minutes riding the rollercoaster before you commit suicide... but when you don't actually want to die, that's 3 minutes of you... well, dying. Also, if you're afraid of heights, this is also cruel.

      --
      Bow before me, for I am root.
  81. You have selected: slow and painful. Great choice! by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    So what if somebody doesn't die on it? Is there a suicide booth at the end and do you have to drop a quarter into it?

  82. Re:there's a lot easier (and cheaper) way, you kno by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

    Oxygen deprivation is hardly something new. Mountaineers have long known to recognise the signs. There is a period of euphoria before the passing out. Tends to be rather short though. I've also read of people getting high from huffing empty aerosol cans that use nitrogen as a propellant.

  83. Re:there's a lot easier (and cheaper) way, you kno by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem with that is that all the fun ones don't kill you. Marijuana doesn't even have a LD50. LSD's LD50 is so high you'll likely die of a very unpleasant heart attack first. Mushrooms also give a particularly nasty death that generally involves suffocating.

    The rest of them are far too unpleasant to even consider. Who wants to die of a crack overdose?

    This is a fine idea, as stupid as it is :)

  84. I have a strange feeling... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Yeah. Another century of eating frozen pizza, driving to the mall and playing Super Mario Brothers. What's not to like?

    ...that you are trying to make that sound bad for some reason.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:I have a strange feeling... by Vietman · · Score: 1

      Why is everyone talking about killing youth in asia?

  85. Why isn't this filed under bat-shit crazy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cause it belongs there.

  86. It wouldn't be 100% effective - John Stapp by securitytech · · Score: 2

    "John Stapp was subjected to 15 g for 0.6 second and a peak of 22 g during a 19 March 1954 rocket sled test. He would eventually survive a peak of more than 46 g, with more than 25 g for 1.1 sec.[6]

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G-force#Human_tolerance_of_g-force

    While Mr. Stapp's tests were short, the coaster doesn't appear to sustain the high level of g's necessary either.

    1. Re:It wouldn't be 100% effective - John Stapp by kermidge · · Score: 2

      Missing from this article, and the one on John Stapp (don't know his rank(s) while he was doing this) was mention of a great article in Life magazine I read at the time. After one briefing, on the way to lunch before an early-afternoon run, Stapp asked the doctor if there was anything he should avoid eating. The response was "Not really. Just don't eat anything that'll scratch on the way up."

      The article on Stapp is worthing reading. Interesting fellow.

  87. ... An opening for him ... by I+don't+want+to+spen · · Score: 1

    Apparently Aperture Labs are considering offering him a job.

    --
    Don't go to a brothel if you want to buy broth
  88. Re:there's a lot easier (and cheaper) way, you kno by Golddess · · Score: 1

    Breathing pure nitrogen would probably be exactly like breathing air except you pass out.

    Certainly seems to be the case.

    --
    "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
  89. When I die ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... I want to go quietly, in my sleep. Like my grandfather.
    Not screaming in terror like his passengers.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  90. Re:there's a lot easier (and cheaper) way, you kno by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can assure you that taking absurdly large quantities of LSD is not fun. At all.

    Coke/crack or meth overdose, yeah, that would be pretty horrible. Heroin or morphine on the other hand... I could think of worse ways to go.

  91. Re:there's a lot easier (and cheaper) way, you kno by AngryDeuce · · Score: 1

    Marijuana doesn't even have a LD50.

    Actually, it does.

    However, for all intents and purposes, it might as well not. The amount one would have to consume is so far beyond anything we'd even be capable of that it doesn't matter. However, it would be totally possible to distill the THC down into pill form and overdose that way, if one were so inclined. Given my excessive familiarity with the effects of marijuana, though, I doubt anyone with that much weed would want to waste it by making suicide pills out of it...and certainly not the motivation required to actually do it.

  92. Flying suit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wanting to end it all on an adrenaline high? Get a batwing/flying suit/squirrel suit and give the sport a try.

    I can't imagine anything more exhillarating than flying in one of those, and then when you eventually mis-judge a flyby or gap in the trees/rocks, you are guaranteed instant death on contact.

  93. Cedar Pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    meh
    take the ludes, man

  94. I want to die peacefully in my sleep like grandpa. by SwedishChef · · Score: 1

    And not screaming in terror like the passengers on his bus.

    --
    No one ever had to evacuate a city because the solar panels broke!
  95. No Thanks by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    I think I can come up with a more enjoyable way to shuffle off this mortal coil. Actually, pretty much every way I think I can come up with would probably be more enjoyable. If you're really into it, though, you could try this!

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  96. NASA report contradicts publicity seeking artist by tlambert · · Score: 1

    NASA report contradicts publicity seeking artist

    http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19980223621_1998381731.pdf ...and how surprising is that, really.

    -- Terry

  97. Oh, the irony... by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

    When I clicked to read more comments, Slashdot displayed an ad for RollerCoaster Rush.

    I did not click on it.

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  98. Soylent green + movement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like a coster added to the finale of Soylent Green http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soylent_Green

  99. You are ALL wrong, here's the best way : by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) 3 ounces of pharmaceutical cocaine.

    2) 6 young and beautiful prostitutes.

    3) a bathtub full of baby oil.

    4) a room full of mattresses.

    You can guess the rest ... and if you cannot, that means more cocaine and whores for me !

  100. What if you change your mind partway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Horrible idea. And then squished to death. Wow, what a genius. His mom must be proud

  101. Mr Bonestripper by crotherm · · Score: 1

    Sounds like "Mr. Bonestripper" from the 1991 movie "Nothing But Trouble".

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=enUo-1TjdEs

    --
    "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable" - JFK
  102. Architect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For some reason this article reminded me of this wonderful piece of work. The Architect Sketch by MP.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2PyeXRwhCE

  103. Very inefficient by Married+to+Christ · · Score: 0

    and understandably as the guy is from ex communist block. Substantial savings can be made by doing away with the loops and have the coaster just go straight down.

  104. Re:there's a lot easier (and cheaper) way, you kno by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But the feel good drug apologists want the world to know that all recreational drugs are safe and healthy, and that Big Pharma and the War On Terror are misleading people about the benefits of crystal meth and heroin.

    Going by what they say, it's just darn near impossible to OD on these wonderful magic drugs that should be made legal and furnished to every man, woman, and child on the planet.

  105. Cribbed from "Shoot Out The Lights"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think I'll pass. But did anyone else read this and think of the song "Wall of Death", from the album "Shoot Out the Lights" (by Richard and Linda Thompson)?

  106. Life Imitating Art by cstacy · · Score: 2

    Didn't the recent episode "The Tip Of The Zoidberg" conclude with a roller coaster designed to help the Professor suicide?

    And what about "Mr. Bonecrusher" in the Chevy Chase movie "Nothing But Trouble"?

    1. Re:Life Imitating Art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bonestripper, you insensitive clod.

    2. Re:Life Imitating Art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are now dead.

      Thank you for using Stop&Drop, America's favorite suicide booth since 2008.

  107. The End by xenobyte · · Score: 1

    ...of coaster fan clubs... They'll all want to try it ("I bet it beats Matterhorn!") and if it works as advertised... no more coaster fans.

    --
    "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
  108. I read a story eerily like this. by Slartibartfast · · Score: 1

    It was one of those dystopian short stories that seem to crop up in high school. Our protagonist was, himself, in high school, and had just gotten, to his parents' consternation, a free trip to the amusement park... run by the Bureau of Population Control, or somesuch. He's elated, but somewhere lets slip that one-in-seven leave the park in a body bag. He goes on various rides, and, occasionally, folks in seats/carts/whatever next to him meet their untimely demise, by way of crashes, electric zaps, and so forth. Eventually, so does the protagonist.

    Odd story, it was. And this sounds freakishly close. "Weird minds think alike."

  109. Fall by xenobyte · · Score: 1

    Generally falling from a great height works just as well, although somewhat messy. The long fall is quiet (except for wind noise) and serene, and the landing at terminal velocity is so swift and destructive that the brain simply doesn't have time to process it.

    I got the idea from an expert commenting on The Falling Man and other jumpers from the doomed WTC towers. He stated that this man - falling head first from the top floors - would hit at terminal velocity and the nerve impulses from the impact would not even have left the nerves when the brain was destroyed. And as there's zero pain nerves in the brain itself, death would be completely painless.

    --
    "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
  110. Inspired by Bill Hicks? "It's just a ride" by uncle+slacky · · Score: 1

    "The world is like a ride in an amusement park, and when you choose to go on it you think it's real because that's how powerful our minds are. The ride goes up and down, around and around, it has thrills and chills, and it's very brightly colored, and it's very loud, and it's fun for a while. Many people have been on the ride a long time, and they begin to wonder, "Hey, is this real, or is this just a ride?" And other people have remembered, and they come back to us and say, "Hey, don't worry; don't be afraid, ever, because this is just a ride."

    --
    Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it.
    1. Re:Inspired by Bill Hicks? "It's just a ride" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And we kill those people."

  111. Slashdot & Suicide Coaster by Transaction7 · · Score: 1

    I think Slashdot hit rock bottom, not to mention 180 degrees off topic, on this one. Trying to figure out how to mod this down but my first try didn't work. The author's pending Ph.D. seems like a parody of the proliferation of useless degrees issued by colleges and universities these days, and may be a tip-off that this is a put-on. Or maybe it's an extreme advertisement for some current or actuallyh proposed amusement ride. The appeal of a lot of these seems to be some illusion of danger. I've been on some big ones at Six Flags etc. and far and away the scariest ride I've ever been on was a little portable one at the county fair. Now what someone might do with this is hook up with Al Gore and the rest of those who talk about reducing the population of the world by a third and maybe you can get a big government grant or loan from Obama or Rick Perry, blow the money on riotous living, go broke, and do it again. who are Suicide happens to be one of the things upon which I have become an expert in my life and career. It is almost always an irrational act. People I know who have somehow survived having shot themselves in the head, taken cyanide, staken 2 poerful sleeping pills with alcohol, hung himself off a railroad trestle with 20' of new rope that broke, etc., much less had their attempts interrupted unexpectedly, are glad they didn't die. I've been with a dozen people who were suffering suicidal depression and not one of them agreed that any of the others should die even when they thought they should. These included teachers, lawyers, bankers, pharmacists, and other smart and educated people, and people lI consider valuable. I'd rather be governed by a lot of the people I knew who had been psych hospital patients for suicidal depression than by a lot of the politicians of both parties I know. I've represented young pre-school kids on up who have attempted suicide and know of completed suicides as young as 8 or 9. A school superintendent showed us figures for suicides, suicide attempts, and other life-threatening behaviors among school kids, and the percentage who had attempted and those who had seriously contemplated suicide were both shocking. After dropping, the rate among yhoung people is moving significantly back upward. Experts I have good reason to believe are right argue convincingly that the decision whether they would kill themselves if things got bad enough in their eyes is often made at about age four or five, too young to comprehend death or the significance of life, and then kill themselves later when triggered by some event back to the ego state of a hurt four year old Child. Almost always, to quote one of the leading professional experts in America, "Treatment and therapy, not suicide, is indicated." This is not something people should be encouraging.

  112. death ride by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I rather have the helium bag over my head.

  113. GLaDOS by Wuahn · · Score: 1

    I can imagine GLaDOS saying "Weeeeeeeeee" on the way down...

  114. Re:there's a lot easier (and cheaper) way, you kno by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 1

    You really only need half, and an ungodly amount of Ben+Jerrys

  115. I SPEET on your steenking 10 G's! by Toad-san · · Score: 1

    10 G's won't kill you. Lots of videos on line (search for "10 G's centrifuge" for them). Admittedly, I don't see a video that continues spinning an unconscious subject at 10 G's until he dies.

    I also question the "euphoria" part. G's are painful, not euphoric. Low or zero-G (that first long drop) may be a bit euphoric to some (like me, who never gets airsick and loves acrobatics and violent fair rides) ... but most people will be puking their guts out as soon as they begin that descent.

    Nope, helium bags sound like a much better idea.

    Of course if this fool actually convinces someone to build this sucker, I'll be in the line! Especially if there's a big prize for the survivors.

  116. breakthrough in physics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    since when spinning loops generate gravitational force?

  117. The Ride of a Lifetime... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... of course there are no repeat riders...

  118. Scary! by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Yes because I want to be scared witless just before I die, that's how I would preferably like to go.

  119. Monkey Island - Rollercoaster of Death by ClockChaos · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who was reminded of the "Rollercoaster of Death" from "The Curse of Monkey Island"? LeChuck would use it to create his undead pirates by having regular pirates ride it and have the last part end with a dip through molten lava. http://www.miwiki.net/The_Carnival_of_the_Damned

  120. caffeine analogy by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    caffeine is a lesser drug of course, but the toxic level of caffeine is also too high to reach during normal consumption, yet possible with pills: at least a few grams.
    it takes about 18 12-ounce cans of Mountain Dew (55mg each) to reach even 1 gram. Even on my most wired days, I've consumed only a few hundred milligrams.

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  121. I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    do you have to be "this" tall before you can ride it?

  122. Tried that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in Rollercoaster Tycoon once, all they do is puke...

  123. IT Outsourcing and cheap power by aqui10 · · Score: 1

    Thats the real future of the Youth-in-Asia!