Slashdot Mirror


User: Thorgal

Thorgal's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
95
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 95

  1. Re:It's not weird on Atari 800XL Used For Heart Diagnostics · · Score: 1

    In this particular case there IS a problem with the technology used. Cassette-recorder based storage is inherently unreliable, and its XC12 incarnation has enough unreliability to drive you insane. Could be somewhat rectified by Turbo2000, though...
    --

  2. Re:Freezing doesn't truly burst cells... on Freeze Recovery Drug - Step Toward Suspended Animation? · · Score: 1
    Mirror for Europeans: http://wfmh.org.pl/enginesofcreation/.

    Milek
    --

  3. Re:You're Confusing Your Objectives... on Developing Subversive Software? · · Score: 1

    Distributing Bibles to Persian Gulf women? You mean, you want them to be even more depressed?

    Bible bashes women on every second page, you know...
    --

  4. Re:You smell money in DeCSS? on Slashback: Toner, Zimmerman, Languages · · Score: 1
    There is an interesting perspective on this in one of the comments in the talkback section.

    Here is a link.
    --

  5. Re:Galaxy Quest beats The Matrix? on The Hugo Awards: Word From A Winner · · Score: 2

    I for one get really bored whenever someone starts reminding us that most of the things in Matrix were in fact thought up by writers decades ago.

    Some points:

    1. Hardly any thought is original. Most of what you read in books or see in the cinema are reprocessed ideas from the past. Sometimes just a few years back, sometimes centuries -- in new clothes. You could dissect almost any movie this way and point to earlier work that contributed to it -- inadvertedly or otherwise.

    2. A movie is not a book. Just because a movie uses some of the ideas from the book does not make it a blockbuster movie. Or even interesting one. Most of Stephen King's books turned out to be boring when translated to screen (with arguable exceptions of "Shining" and "Misery"). The fact that Dick (and others, centuries(!) ago), came up with some ideas that found their way into "Matrix" by no means makes it _lesser_ movie. To the contrary -- it's probably the first movie that managed to introduce some quite complex ways of thinking about our world to unwashed masses. And how beautifully at that.

    3. I could argue here, that teologians from centuries ago were tacking ideas that Dick later picked up. Is it a valid point? Does it diminish the quality of Dick's works? Judge by yourself.

    Milek
    --

  6. GA evolved robotic life on Slashback: Titanium, Art, Israel · · Score: 1
    Speaking of robots evolved with help of genetics algorithms:

    http://www.frams.poznan.pl/

    Both interesting and beautiful.
    --

  7. Re:nope, against the rules on Battlebots Starting On Comedy Central Tonight · · Score: 2

    It's a shame.

    Imagine black, small, disk-shaped robot looking completely harmless. It just sits there, not even trying to move. It produces no sound, even if you listen really carefully. No fire-throwers, no blinking lights, no hammers, cutters nor any other medieval stuff.

    All around it battle rages on and the robot is motionless.

    But you would be mistaken to think that it does nothing. In fact, it's scanning the ether for signals. It listens, learns and reasons. It guesses frequencies used by all contestants. It figures what each command does by building the map of battlefield with help of proximity meters and sophisticated heuristics extracting valueable information from command sequences radioed to fighting robots.

    Soon it can control its opponents. Using powerful transmitter hidden inside its hull, it oh-so-slighly "enhances" orders of operators. A bit more to the left here, so that that arm could reach you. Trying to strike forward? Let me delay you for a second, just enough for this fire-blowing robot to get in your way.

    Complete control over the battlefield. The last remaining opponent just uses it's weapons on itself and the victory is ours.

    --

  8. Re:Novel != movie on Neil Stephenson on Batman Beyond Project? · · Score: 1

    ...and 1/3 less interesting. I love geek parts, they makes the book so unique.
    --

  9. Re:The McDonald's coffee case on Samba Runs Into Naming Problems In Germany · · Score: 1

    She was NOT driving. Read the link he provided, then post.
    --

  10. Re:Genesis??? on Rosetta Disk For 10K-Year History · · Score: 1

    Yeah, so now Big-Bang is a "creation myth"?

    --

  11. Re:Arthur C. Clarke, you were right... on Lamprey Cells Drive Robot · · Score: 1

    Hey, but your brain IS a machine.

    --

  12. Re:"Jack the sound barrier. Bring the noise" on Stephenson On His Novel In Progress · · Score: 1

    I've got shivers every time I read it.

    Wonder how it's going to look in Polish translation.


    --

  13. Re:The importance of documentation on Space Shuttle Software: Not For Hacks · · Score: 1

    Hey, at BellStream they work this way on non-mission critical projects, too. Or rather, they treat every project as mission-critical. ;)
    --

  14. Re:Not quite fair on Intel FDIV bug vs ILUVYOU · · Score: 1

    Accidental gun deaths? Well, to lead this analogy further is to say MS has put guns in the hands of all their users. Oh well...

    Milek
    --

  15. Opt-Out? A quicker and better solution. on DoubleClick DoubleCross · · Score: 1


    echo "127.0.0.1 doubleclick.net" >> /etc/hosts

  16. Illusions on Seeking a Ghost via Web Cam · · Score: 1

    Check out the entry for pareidolia in "The Skeptic's Dictionary" (http://www.skepdic.com/pareidol.html ) to learn more about why people see ghosts in a bunch of blurry pixels. You may also wish to visit my page, which deals specifically with such images on the Moon (http://wfmh.org.pl/~thorgal/Moon/). Enjoy.

  17. Re:I did NOT sleep with that woman. on Microsoft NSA key Follow-Up · · Score: 1

    Um, let me remind you that programmers doing daily
    builds only have to deal with *public* keys, as only these are being compiled into the final binary. What follows, only public keys have to be stored in the building, and locations of both *private* keys are still not known.

    Milek

  18. Re:What a way to usher in the 21st century... on Evolution is a Myth in Kansas · · Score: 1

    That was really intelligent. In similar vein, the theory of gravity
    should not be taught as proven fact.

    Learn what the scientific meaning of "theory" is, then post.

  19. a link on Amiga & Transmeta? · · Score: 1
  20. Re:NASA's history of lies on NASA Was Prepared to Silence Stranded Moon Astronauts · · Score: 1

    NASA has never made secret of the way Challenger
    astronauts died. There is an official report somewhere
    on their web site which details a sequence of events
    before and after the explosion. IIRC, it says that
    it is supposed astronauts were conscious after crew
    compartment separated and it states that they all
    probably were killed on water-impact (200G).