Slashdot Mirror


Battlebots Starting On Comedy Central Tonight

Hitch writes: " Comedy Central begins broadcasting BattleBots tonight at 10:30 EDT. Tonight's episode: Prelude to Battle - introducing the idea to those unfamiliar. For those who want to take a look early, the BattleBots Web site gives a lot of good info, including RealVideo clips of previous battles. "

153 comments

  1. How could it not be? by Captain+Pillbug · · Score: 2

    All the contestants are nerds, and they use their nerd powers to build devices that smash each other into little pieces. It's at least as newsworthy as any other attempt by mainstream media to notice linux or other icons of hackdom.

  2. Brittian's Robot Wars by catseye_95051 · · Score: 1

    For thsoe in the SF bay area, our local PBS station (KTEH) has been showing England's RobotWars show-- this looks to be a pretty similar.

    RobotWars admits they were inspired by the underground competitions that were (still are?) staged in this area. (They were underground,as I udnerstand, because insurance would have been prohibitively expensive had the real nature of the exhibitiosn been known before-hand.)

    Robot Wars is narrated/officiated with great gusto by Craig Charles-- Lister from Red Dwarf. he really adds a lot of value to the show.

  3. Re:robot wars anyone? by warsawza · · Score: 1

    RobotWar was an excellent game... I've seen several progressions of the idea including a few that used java as the control language for the bots but I don't think any of them worked well enough/had a wide enough user base to become recognised.
    Shame really cos it was a really sound geek alternative to snail fighting.

  4. Re:tripe by King+of+the+World · · Score: 1
    so you're saying your contempt was EXTREME!?!?!?!!!

    (heh heh heh)

  5. Nothing funny about humans? by pwhysall · · Score: 1

    I was unfortunate enough to catch a few moments of WCWWF PsychoNitroSlapMyBitchUpDown or something whilst randomly channelhopping and it was one of the funniest things I've ever seen.

    "Grr. I'm hard, me. I'm going to come round your house and punch your face in with my forearm and then leap off the furniture onto you!"

    This freak show^W^Wsport is a pisstake, right?

    The dead giveaway, of course, is the much higher than normal preponderence of mullets...
    --

    --
    Peter
  6. Re:Absolutely Awesome by ErikZ · · Score: 1

    Where the hell did you read that?
    I saw something where they did blood tests on Lawyers and found abnormally high testoserone in the men AND the women.

    --
    Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  7. maybe not.... by bitchazz · · Score: 1

    "Bet on wedge shaped robots with a flipper on the upper surface. The flipper will invert the opponent, and can also act as a self-righting mechanism."

    Well I saw the opening episode of Battlebots last night and was thouroughly entertained. And there was a little fellow named "Disposable Hero" which was equipped with a flipper just as you described. Unfortunately, the other bot was armed with a giant high RPM spinning disk which made short work of little "Hero." Parts flew off. It was ugly. =)

  8. Re:tripe by Mandi+Walls · · Score: 1
    oh my gawd, i, like, totally agree.

    could they make a cool show any more stupid? surely there has to be a better format for this than some jock-strapped sports show.

    you take a bunch of really smart people, have them build robots, and then send in fourth graders to talk to them.

    Yeah, okay.

    now, if they put jon stewart in there, well, then i'd be taping the show...and that might begin to counterbalance the inanity of the rest of the crew.

  9. Credit for the Sci-Fi channel by sammy+baby · · Score: 1

    Sci-Fi doesn't exactly have a huge treasure trove of quality original programming, but give credit where credit is due. For example: Farscape, despite having Wizard of Oz syndrome in the casting room ("Okay - we need an Alien Warrior, Exotic Priestess, Loveable Rogue, and Good 'Ol Boy - get casting!"), cheesy intro-outro music (think closing theme to ST:TOS style wailing), and awful villians (C'mon. A guy named Scorpius?), has some of the best dialogue to ever grace a sci-fi show, some truly mind-fscking plot twists, and some great special effects. Not to mention, many bonus points for Claudia Black. Rrowl.

  10. Re:robot wars anyone? by NaughtyEddie · · Score: 2
    Utter rubbish. Robot Wars is a full-fledged competition with rules too. The people build their own robots according to the rules, and battle it out. I never heard any complaints of rigging, and it's certainly not a show for kids ... more a show for geeks, some of whom are kids.

    Fact is, the UK got this show *way* before you guys, and Battlebots is just a recompilation of the exact same source code. Not a single new idea in there. You don't even have the adorable Philipa Forrester presenting.

    UK: 1
    USA: 0

    --

    --
    It's a .88 magnum -- it goes through schools.
    -- Danny Vermin
  11. Re:Comedy Central? by NaughtyEddie · · Score: 2

    God, Lexx really sucks.

    --

    --
    It's a .88 magnum -- it goes through schools.
    -- Danny Vermin
  12. Indeed by pingflood · · Score: 1
    As a matter of fact, given the choice, I'd rather have someone smack me in the crotch with a baseball bat than watch a single minute of that drivel.

    -pf

  13. Re:They Aren't Robots! by toh · · Score: 2

    Exactly what I thought when I looked at the site. They're just expensive RC toys with game geeks controlling them. If one toy tears another to shreds, it's just meanspiritedness on the part of the human controller, making up for his (it will invariably be a he) lack of endowment by bashing some other goof's toy to smithereens, all for the benefit of WWF-descended network execs.

    By contrast, when a well-written program in MUSE Robotwar or one of it's many successors (like Robowar) wins by a landslide, you feel a sense of fait accompli. But the people making real-life robots that can actually make their own decisions have better things to do than try and one-up someone else's work.

    --
    -- Life is short. Forgive quickly. Kiss slowly. ~ Robert Doisneau
  14. Robot Wars.....is far cooler. by supernaut · · Score: 1

    Robot wars is far cooler. As with anything british that is later americanized, this is no different. You have way too much human chatting about this and that, no House Robots, (house robots are part of the fun of Robot Wars, how can you even think of doing a show without them?)

    I will say the only redeeming value of the show is it seems the rules for the bots are looser than they are for RW. While this is fine, I personally think that without that almost impossible to beat adversary, its a joke. Kinda like playing doom with the God Code. After awhile, its no longer fun.

    One of the things I noticed is, its very similar to Celebrity Deathmatch. With their newsdesk type of setup. Rather lame.

    Its really sad to see another quality Brit show totally and blandly redone american style. I lamented when they started the American version of "Whose line is it anyway".

    I can just imagine what will be next. There are some formula's that just should not be tampered with, this was one of them.

    Ill continue watching RW on our PBS station, I think BB sucks ass. Its a very poor american ripoff. Despite what some people here think. Everything aside from a few details has been replicated, including a vacant blonde in the staging area.

    BB could have been better done.

    --
    Supernaut
    1. Re:Robot Wars.....is far cooler. by A.+Aria · · Score: 1
      I lamented when they started the American version of "Whose line is it anyway".

      Well, it would help if it wasn't on a Disney-owned station. They have to keep everything way too clean. Though they're getting away with more than I would have expected, especially so early in the evening.

      -A. Aria

  15. Re:tripe by Kintanon · · Score: 2

    I thought the ladybug was genius, myself. It got me thinking, what would the rules say about enclosing an opposing robot in a Faraday cage to prevent RF signals from reaching it. Technically, it's not electric and it's not actually *jamming* the signal...


    The major flaw in the lady bug was that the saw blade was attached to the upper casing. So that if a bot caught the casing with something the saw blade could be prvented from reaching it. As soon as the Lady bug goes up against something with an offense other than flipping (A saw blade or something) it's going to get destroyed. If the saw blad had its own movement system whereby it could move around under the shell more it would be far more effective.
    My own design that I'm working on implementing is well nigh invincible in every test so far. I hope to actually get the full sized model built and entered in the contest eventually.

    Kintanon

    --
    Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
  16. Does Joel from MST3k have a part of this? by RevAaron · · Score: 2

    My girlfriend, who was a big Mystery Science Theater 3000 fan was looking around a while back a the Gizmonics website and happened upon Joel and his brother Jim's coloring book. One of the pages of the coloring book (page 22) has the caption: 'Production supervisors for "Robot Wars."' By any off chance, is this Comedy Central program these "Robot Wars" that Jim and Joel Hodgson are working on? I missed the show, so I didn't get a chance to check the credits.

    --

    Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
  17. Re:Robot Wars? by Captain+Pillbug · · Score: 1

    Tell me about it. In this version, you're even restricted as to what kind of decals you can put on the bots -- they must be "tasteful" and suitable for viewing by minors. Sheesh.

  18. Aha: a loophole by Captain+Pillbug · · Score: 4

    There is no restriction on the number of different types of materials that can be used to construct your BattleBot.

    I'm going to build my battlebot out of rabid wolverines.

    1. Re:Aha: a loophole by sulli · · Score: 2

      I'm going to build mine out of magnesium, with a balloon of water balanced on top. Saw blade hits H20 and kaboom!

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
    2. Re:Aha: a loophole by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, a rabid PITA activist...

      Nope, that'll just piss off WETP (Wolverines for the Ethical Treatment of PETA).


      ---
      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    3. Re:Aha: a loophole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm going to build my battlebot out of rabid wolverines.

      Since the wolverines would be in danger of getting hurt, I don't think the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PITA) would approve.

      On the other hand, a rabid PITA activist...

    4. Re:Aha: a loophole by AndyL · · Score: 2

      Who cares about PITA? More importantly your 'bot' wouldn't stand a chance! When it's teeth vs rotating saw blades, My money is on the blades.

    5. Re:Aha: a loophole by warsawza · · Score: 1

      I resent the association of animal rights and snack bread! =)

  19. Re:put them all ona desert island.... by nublord · · Score: 1
    (ref your sig)

    And NBC is testing those idiots on an island...hmm, they just found a better idiot.

  20. Re:put them all ona desert island.... by nublord · · Score: 1
    Uh, is that show on NBC? Or is it CBS?

    Eh, who cares.

  21. Not a ripoff by RevRigel · · Score: 4

    I'm seeing a lot of posts to the effect that this is a ripoff of Robot Wars UK. It's not. Robot Wars has been around in the US since 1995, but that effort was plagued by legal troubles and general bad blood, and the Robot Wars name got auctioned, I guess to Mentorn (who does Robot Wars UK). Battlebots has been around for a while now, and they've been having competitions for over a year. BotBash exists too, although it's somewhat different. Battlebots exists primarily to fill the void left by Robot Wars's absence in the US, not to imitate Robot Wars UK. They actually take the time to put together events that aren't necessarily always in the same place in the US every few months, which is a Good Thing. Meaning..shows that those of us on this side of the Atlantic can go to, possibly. I've got a few gripes, though, really. The Robot Wars UK people live and breathe stupid jargon. They're basically sports announcers, but really horrible. And also..it's more like Robot boxing, or wrestling, than Robot Wars. If you want to get a few dozen robots, put them out in the woods as separate teams, and let them fight it out, that might be more deserving of the moniker.

  22. Re:This is cool... and some important info by GearheadShemTov · · Score: 2
    Battlebots and Robot Wars can be fun to watch, but I have no interest in them beyond the spectacle. It isn't that I don't like robot bloodsports, it's that these things aren't really robots. They are radio control toys that pump iron.

    If you really want to know how to build autonomous robots, there are several competitions with the same level of excitement as Battlebots et al, but with the added benefit that you can imagine it might eventually be a good thing to turn the resulting machines loose in the real world.

    For instance, Robot Sumo is quite popular in Japan and the US. You can find the rules and links to competitions at Sine Robotics. Another big competition is the Trinity College Fire-Fighting Home Robot Contest, wherein robots navigate a known maze (a model house floorplan) to put out a fire (simulated by a lit candle).

    Another nice thing about these competitions is they can be cheaper to get into than Battlebots (less heavy iron and welding). And there are lots of good people and organizations who can help you climb the learning curve. Just a few of my favorites are the Seattle Robotics Society, The Robotics Club of Yahoo, Raleigh Triangle Amateur Robotics Group, Portland Area Robotics Society, Robotics Society of Southern CA, and the San Francisco Robotics Society of America.

    Finally, here's a few places you can find parts, books, plans, kits, and lots of links: Mondo-Tronics, Acroname, and Robot Books.com.

  23. Re:Wonderful!... But still... by Stormgren · · Score: 1

    One of the Discovery channels was showing it in the US earlier this summer under the title "Junkyard Wars". That was a great show. Personally, the floating Land Rover was the best IMHO.

    "All those tubes and wires and careful notes!"

    --

    "All those tubes and wires and careful notes!"

  24. Re:They Aren't Robots! by derrickh · · Score: 1

    Some people like watching legos run around a maze.
    Some people like watching gross displays of violence and destruction.
    personally, I'm in the second group.

  25. Re:Gas and Liquid fuels allowed! by Kintanon · · Score: 2

    Ooh. Gas and liquid fuels are also allowed. There's a pressure limit on gases, and 10 oz of liquid fuels. I wonder how quickly a grinder uses up fuel...


    Speaking of this, did anyone see if there is a specific restriction against Flamethrowers/Explosives? I couldn't find anything specifically prohibitting, but I imagine their effectiveness would be limited... Would make for an interesting show though... >:)

    Kintanon

    --
    Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
  26. Sewing Machine Magic by rjnerd · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the kind words. The brit series is all taped, its now the directors/editors turn to go heads down and turn more than 100 hours of tape into a coherent 50 minute (44 for the US market) whole. (they usually have 6-8 cameras going while building, and often more than that while testing) No more flying over to London at the TV companies expense till next year.

    You may not believe this, but that tape was made the first day the team had ever met in person. (our common friends were suprised we didn't already know each other, there were several that knew all three of us) We were originally going to describe how a Mr. Coffee worked, how it got cold water from the bottom mounted resivoir to hot water out the outlet over the basket, without anything resembling a pump. But it was late on Sunday, and we couldn't find a matching pair to bisect on camera... (Crash had brought his sawzall to the session for that purpose). Geo suggested sewing machines, so we rooted around the junk in his loft, and found the makings of the machine. (yes, the bobbin is Cat 5 ethernet cable, in electric blue) Took us about half an hour to build.

    --
    Organizer:New England Rubbish Deconstruction Society;The NERDS,first US team in the UK Scrapheap Challenge/Junkyard Wars
  27. Re:Reality surpasses (game) Fantasy by NetGuruFL · · Score: 1

    Have you seen the sequal? It looks like it might finally be completed soon.

    http://www.omf.com

  28. Re:BattleBots... by generic-man · · Score: 2

    Actually, I remember seeing that MIT has had robot battles for some time. Last spring, at Spring Carnival, Carnegie Mellon introduced a new event to the Mobot festivities: MoboJoust. Basically, two robots started at opposite ends of a narrow "arena," and the first one to cross the other's goal line (or get closest in 30 seconds) won. It was hilarious seeing some of these robots pulverize their opponents. In fact, on the promo for the next BattleBots, I was shocked to hear the name "Overkill," also the name of the winner of this year's MoboJoust. It's not the same robot, though. Oh well.

    Don't underestimate the power of private funding, though. The Mobot people get assistance from such companies as Dell Computer, Lockheed Martin, and Schlumberger. They have some good tech at their disposal. Literally. :)

    --
    For more information, click here.
  29. Re:Keep the robots, dump the humans! by derrickh · · Score: 1

    I love the announcer guys. They're a lot better than the PPV announcers. The blond guy is actually funny and the brothers are great. And the fact that they arent trying to push Donna D'errico as a legit commentator makes it even better.

  30. Re:robot wars anyone? by NaughtyEddie · · Score: 1

    Not without Philipa Forrester. Mmm. If I knew what hot grits were, I'd pour them down her pants.

    --

    --
    It's a .88 magnum -- it goes through schools.
    -- Danny Vermin
  31. The Real Survivor by SEWilco · · Score: 2

    Steel Survivor. Or perhaps titanium.

  32. Re:Reality surpasses (game) Fantasy by generic-man · · Score: 1

    That game was incredible. It was the first shareware program I ever registered, and they even sent me two copies of it, complete with manuals and disks. :)

    OMF was also the first game that caused me to get so mad I started shouting "choice" words and smashing my keyboard to bits. My parents made me buy another one.

    It wouldn't surprise me to see it's Abandonware, although I've seen some blocky 3-D games that are still damn fun after all these years. In addition to wireframe classics like Elite and BattleTanks (their imitations, Void and Tank Pilot, play well on the Palm) I remember playing MCGA classics like 4-D Boxing and Stunt Driver. Those games 0wned, and they could be cracked rather easily.

    --
    For more information, click here.
  33. Robot Wars UK by generic-man · · Score: 1

    Sure, after reading all the negative comments from fans of Robot Wars UK, I think I'll give it a try. Let me just flip to my nearby BBC affiliate.

    *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click*

    Hmm, I don't appear to have one. I guess I can't watch Robot Wars UK, because I'm not in the UK! I'll have to settle for BattleBots then.

    And BTW, I _loved_ the premiere.

    --
    For more information, click here.
  34. Re:Wonderful!... But still... by BinxBolling · · Score: 1
    You've obviously not been watching it then! Cassius and Chaos2 both had wicked air rams which would flip another robot over - it's now quite a popular design.

    Not surprising. Sawblades in general seem like a bad idea - it would take too long for them to cut deep enough to do any damage. And the lighter robots wouldn't be able to put enough pressure behind the blade to dig in, anyways. But a ram could inflict massive damage in a single stroke, and could easily flip over lighter or less stable robots.

    But it seems like the design goal behind a lot of the robots is "Make it look scary to humans", rather than "Make it able to absorb and deal out heavy damage from/to other robots". The sawblade bots, for example. And what about Mechadon? I admit, it looks cool as hell. But I'd imagine that it's quite unstable on those legs, compared to something with a lower center of gravity. And it's effectively unarmed.

  35. Re:This Viewer's Reaction by derrickh · · Score: 1

    You have to remember that this is geared to the mainstream. Having it simply be robot vs robot without hype or backstories would limit it to just techies. Like it or not, most people need a to latch on to a personality to stay interested.

  36. This is cool... and some important info by cr@ckwhore · · Score: 5

    I watched this (it should have higher ratings than survivor) and it's very cool! I'm actually considering building one of my own... that desire will probably wear off in a week, but I may as well waste my own cpu cycles thinking about it.

    I checked out their website and read the rules. They recommend using PCM (Pulse Code Modulation) transceivers to minimize interference among the many controllers around the competition. There is NOT any rule about hacking the PCM signal of your opponent!! Whadda'ya think? How about a bot that uses some high tech weaponry, rather than saw blades and missles. Let's get smart here...

    Anyway, I like this show and I think it should stay around for a while. The website mentioned that 16 more episodes are scheduled for the upcoming tournament in November, somewhere in Las Vegas.

    --cr@ckwhore

    --
    Skiers and Riders -- http://www.snowjournal.com
    1. Re:This is cool... and some important info by Fesh · · Score: 1
      Yipe! How close were the spectators? Halon can suffocate people if you're not careful...


      --Fesh
      "Citizens have rights. Consumers only have wallets." - gilroy

      --
      --Fesh
      Kill -9 'em all, let root@localhost sort 'em out.
    2. Re:This is cool... and some important info by cowscows · · Score: 1

      It most likely is illegal to mess with your opponents signal. And even if it isn't, it sorta goes against the spirit of the whole thing, which is all about watching robots kick the crap out of each other, not staring at a bunch of ECM devices fighting it out. That'd be interesting to a handful of geeks out there maybe, but wouldn't make for very good TV.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    3. Re:This is cool... and some important info by Kris_J · · Score: 2

      Do the controllers have direct line of sight to the bots? If so, you could develop one with a secondary IR transceiver and a radio jammer. Or even one with some autonomous functions where it jams the RF signals for the duration of the "move"...

    4. Re:This is cool... and some important info by SheldonYoung · · Score: 2

      They recommend using PCM (Pulse Code Modulation) transceivers to minimize interference among the many controllers around the competition.

      This is a bogus reason, PCM is just as susceptible to interferance as PPM. They're both just different modulation forms of FM.

      PCM is, however, sometimes a little better at masking the interference by ignoring signals it can't recognize, but it doesn't mean you still have control.

    5. Re:This is cool... and some important info by cwebster · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine told me about a robot fighting competetion he had been to, and one of the robots was outfitted with a Halon system, and he was lucky enough to go against a bot that used a modified internal combustion engine. To halon bot backed into the other and released the gas, and no more combustion.

  37. Re:Wonderful!... But still... by Leibherk · · Score: 1
    They have Bill Nye science guy.

    not that that really helps...

    --
    "Maggie call Aquaman!!!"
  38. Re:Wonderful!... But still... by Captain+Pillbug · · Score: 1

    Robot Wars had that guy from Red Dwarf!

    But Battlebots does have that babe from Baywatch. She makes up for her absent geek-value with other, ahem, assets.

  39. Re:As a libertarian by Erroneous+Blowhard · · Score: 1

    You and Willie Brown!

  40. Re:Wonderful!... But still... by Flabble · · Score: 2

    Actually, although RobotWars was the first robot combat based organization, relatively soon after they began (a few competitions) it was "taken over" by corporate interests and the founder, Marc Thorpe was essentially kicked out. After somewhat long and drawn out legal circumstances and various canceled robot combat events (such as Robotica) BattleBots was born. Also, BattleBots has had several competitions, however it has always been PPV only before.

    You can get a more in depth history of the sport at http://www.robotcombat.com/history.html

    Flabble

  41. Re:Be an active viewer, please! by Captain+Pillbug · · Score: 1

    And if that doesn't work, then technical expert Bill Nye should build a baking-soda volcano in Comedy Central's CEO's executive offices.

  42. Re:Wonderful!... But still... by barogers@iserv.net · · Score: 1

    But the British Robot Wars, lister or not, is an adaptation of the original US Robot Wars, which was never broadly televised, at least where I am. From what I have seen of the original, and now the Battlebots incarnation, the Battlebots seems to be much more like the first, being more of a deathmatch between the bots all the time rather than the bots vs. the environment, aka the almighty House Bots.

    Plus, just watch the the match with Backlash fighting in this new one. I have never seen one bot throw another several feet in the UK version, sending motors and speed controllers flying...

    Now they just need the voice from Q3 to say "Excellent!", and "Humilation!"

  43. Robot Wars' puny weapons by aarku · · Score: 1
    The reason why the weapons on Robot Wars are weak compared to BattleBots' is the maximum weight allowance.

    A RobotWars robot in the 'Heavy Weight' category can be as heavy as 90 kg, or about 200 pounds. A BattleBot can weigh up to 488 pounds, or about 221 kg. So the engineers have about 250% more weight to work with...

    That makes a big difference folks.

  44. Re:Gas and Liquid fuels allowed! by SEWilco · · Score: 1

    I hope flaming goo is not allowed. Napalm leaking into the floor of their arena would make an even bigger mess than what happens above the floor.

  45. Re:Gas and Liquid fuels allowed! by generic-man · · Score: 1
    From the rules:

    11.2 Forbidden Weapons
    The following weapons may not be used:
    [snip]

    3. Explosives or Flammable Solids - This includes, but is not limited to the following:
    • DOT Class C devices
    • Gunpowder/Cartridge Primers
    • Military Explosives, etc.


    --
    For more information, click here.
  46. Re:They Aren't Robots! by Forgotten · · Score: 1

    On the other hand, Merriam-Webster specifically mentions automation (meaning, an automaton), and doesn't mention remote control. Pocket Oxford doesn't mention remote control and also wants it to look like a human. Dictionaries differ, none of them is gospel, and very few of them are written by robotics experts. And there's more than one way to shoot off your mouth. ;)

    More importantly, your definition is too broad - by that standard your VCR is a robot when you tell it to play, rewind and eject a tape. If we extend "complex actions" to include solid-state devices, so are a lot of other things with no ability to run even the simplest program.

    The popular definition of robots makes them automatons. Many people will also agree with Oxford that they ought to be human-seeming, though that's changed in the last fifteen years since most people have seen a car-building robot. The remote-control devices in this game show aren't much different from the video representations in an arcade game where you select your player's abilities from a menu and then whack on your opponent with the punch and kick buttons. That doesn't mean it won't be entertaining to watch, though, and it'll probably be popular among the subsection of the teen male crowd that's too proud to watch actual human wrestling.

  47. Re:Keep the robots, dump the humans! by jbarnett · · Score: 3

    why not inclose the robots in a bullproof, safety glass, plexglass transparent container? Or put then in a steal cage. Or take the crowd out and just have carmea's, all the metal flying, but no one gets hurt.

    --

    "`Ford, you're turning into a penguin. Stop it.'" -THHGTTG
  48. BattleBots was insanely boring by Jamie+Zawinski · · Score: 1

    I went to the last BattleBots show in San Francisco, and man, it sucked!

    Each match was 2-3 minutes and there was at least 10 minutes of nothing between them. We didn't even get an idiot presenter, or music!

    I really expected it to be better than SRL, but it wasn't. SRL's problem is a complete lack of pacing, and I thought that with the directed goal of a competition, that would give BattleBots the pacing that SRL so desperately needs. But they totally blew it by having so much dead air!

    And how many times can you watch one triangular wedge bump into another triangular wedge? I was particularly impressed at how badly they pilotted their vehicles: you'd think they'd spend some time learning to drive RC vehicles first, wouldn't you? I guess they spent all their time building them and none driving them... It appeared that each match was won by accident, not by the skill involved in either driving or construction.

    I'd watch it on TV, but I'm sure that whatever else is on at that time will be better.

    SomethingAwful.com has a review of the TV version of a recent Robot Wars. It sounds differently awful, but very similarly awful in many ways.

  49. Re:nope, against the rules by Thorgal · · Score: 2

    It's a shame.

    Imagine black, small, disk-shaped robot looking completely harmless. It just sits there, not even trying to move. It produces no sound, even if you listen really carefully. No fire-throwers, no blinking lights, no hammers, cutters nor any other medieval stuff.

    All around it battle rages on and the robot is motionless.

    But you would be mistaken to think that it does nothing. In fact, it's scanning the ether for signals. It listens, learns and reasons. It guesses frequencies used by all contestants. It figures what each command does by building the map of battlefield with help of proximity meters and sophisticated heuristics extracting valueable information from command sequences radioed to fighting robots.

    Soon it can control its opponents. Using powerful transmitter hidden inside its hull, it oh-so-slighly "enhances" orders of operators. A bit more to the left here, so that that arm could reach you. Trying to strike forward? Let me delay you for a second, just enough for this fire-blowing robot to get in your way.

    Complete control over the battlefield. The last remaining opponent just uses it's weapons on itself and the victory is ours.

    --

    --
    "Man in the Moon and other weird things" - wfmh.org.pl/thorgal/Moon/
  50. Same thing over and over... by rjnerd · · Score: 2

    The only physics it demonstrates is Ke=1/2mv^2, and you don't get to see them building the things.

    There is a real "Iron" chef like mechanical challenge show, in the UK it goes by the name Scrapheap Challenge, when shown in the US, they call it Junkyard Wars. It too features a Red Dwarf actor as host, this time Robert, the guy that plays Kryten (without the mask however).

    Basic premise: Two 3 person teams are each provided with a specalist, identical workshops, and equal access to an 800 ton pile of scrap metal. (literally). Dragged from their beds at the crack of dawn, costumed in flameproofed jump suits, they are given a problem to solve (something "simple" like a one person glider, or a 4 person amphibian. How about A diving bell, or a MPG marathon machine. It might be something that can solve a problem, say retrieve a car sunk underwater), and they have 10 hours to build a solution, using only what they pull off the scrap pile. The next day, the two machines are run head to head, and the better one's team advances to the next round, and a harder challenge.

    I organized the first US team to compete. We think its a whole lot more fun than Survivor or Iron Chef. The obvious questions are answered in my FAQ

    In the UK, the show is carried by Channel 4, and the new season starts Sept 17. In the US, TLC carries it, but not particularly well. (they have show 6 of the 13 existing episodes, and haven't yet agreed to pick up the third season. They have commisioned their own version, to be shown in Jan/Feb timeframe.)

    -dp-
    We flew over, we built, we can't say what we got to build, or how we did until the shows air, we had a truly great time.

    This planet needs a lot more kids that think taking the lawnmowers' engine apart is more fun than playing nintendo.

    --
    Organizer:New England Rubbish Deconstruction Society;The NERDS,first US team in the UK Scrapheap Challenge/Junkyard Wars
  51. Re: Robot Wars? SRL is better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This stuff is interesting, but it still pales in comparison to Survival Research Laboratories, who've been staging battles between bigger, scarier robots (railguns! gerbil-powered flamethrowers! helicopters with spikes on the bottom! cow carcasses stuffed with rotten dairy products!) for years.

  52. Re:Wonderful!... But still... by daBum · · Score: 1

    From what I saw, Junkyard wars (US Name), was airing on TLC on Wed nights. However, they seem to have stopped showing (showed the episodes from last year, and hinted at the "next season" episodes.). Anyone know when / if they'll be back on?

    --
    I am dyslexia of borg - your ass will be laminated.
  53. Re:Reality surpasses (game) Fantasy by Xentax · · Score: 1

    Ooh, post a link. OMF was cool.

    --
    You shouldn't verb words.
  54. Re:This Viewer's Reaction by Luminous · · Score: 1
    And to continue this thought. Remember, BattleBots is on Comedy Central, not PBS, not Discovery Channel, not local access. What this means is they have to pull a certain level of ratings from the typical Comedy Central watcher to make it worth their while doing.

    Thus, we get the hype and the 'personalities'.

    Let us not fail to realize that what this is doing is making something that is considered tres geek and making it into something worthwhile by pop culture. Anything that enlightens that masses, even by a little, gets my thumbs up. Who knows, those gearheads might make the next super killer robot instead of adding lifters to their musclecar. And super killer robots are a hell of a lot more fun than musclecars, IMHO.

    --
    This is not the way to build a lasting empire.
  55. nope, against the rules by Captain+Pillbug · · Score: 3

    From the rules:

    Electricity - The use of electricity as a weapon shall be forbidden. This includes, but is not limited to the following:

    ¥ Stun Guns/Cattle Prods
    ¥ RF jamming equipment, etc.



    Hacking your opponents' signal would constitute "jamming".

  56. my analysis of this after a year o' Robot Wars... by justahack · · Score: 1

    I tried my best to keep a little optomism about it, in hopes that we americans wouldn't screw such a wonderful concept up too badly. i was beginning to think we might actually be capable of creating entertainment that wasn't completely mindless, and that this would focus on quality engineering and the versatility of the robots, as in Robot Wars UK. and then they announced donna d'errico as floor comentator.....

    --
    what hump?
  57. Childhood dreams come true by kisrael · · Score: 1
    Man, this show is so cool. I know Survival Research has been doing it forever, but bringing it to the mass market is great. The format's a little dorky, but those two brothers are pretty funny.

    And hands up-- how many people have always dreamed of a show like this, like since they were a kid? 'Course my dreams had teams of self-controlled humanoid 'bots and tanks, and more guns, but still...

    'Course it really is battle of the Remote Control Cars... but I guess it makes for better battles, leave the AI for the lego 'bot warriors.

    --
    SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
  58. This looks like... by TJamieson · · Score: 1

    ...US First gone homicidal! However, I really like the idea - robotics is a field that, AFAIK, is kind of pushed aside. Adding this entertainment element may push more interest into robotics - whether it be for things like prosthetic limbs, or all-out war. The field of robotics IMO is what the next technological push may be towards (ie Bioengineering, AI, and the like).

    --
    For the last time, PIN Number and ATM Machine are redundancies!
  59. Re:Wonderful!... But still... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Speaking of her *ahem* assets ...

  60. Get a Dish Network dish... by Svartalf · · Score: 2

    BBC USA on Dish covers it- or at least it did when I last saw BBC USA on my friend's cable setup (I've got Dish, I know they carry it- I just don't have budget to add it in light of my DSL line purchase... :-)

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  61. Re:They Aren't Robots! by dilligaff · · Score: 1

    Check this out linaxe
    Sure, but if you give one monkey one typewriter

    --
    Sure, but if you give one monkey one typewriter
    The first thing he types will be a UNIX Command!
  62. Re:Survival Research Laboratories by sideshow · · Score: 1
    Trust me their shows are something else. The only problem is that the announce the shows like the day before. I guess they have this problem with the San Francisco police because they seem to get arrested a lot. They have a jet engine they tow around behind a truck that they turn on afterburner and park in front of the Roxy. Right now they are working on a machine that works like a pitching machine that shoots 2x4's. It's powered by a 500hp Eldorado engine.

    Hey I do web design!!!

    --

    Hollow words will burn and hollow men will burn.

  63. Re:saw one ni nen mae.. I mean, 2 years ago by Broccolist · · Score: 1
    Actually, that should be "ninenkan mae". You have to add -kan to the time (which usually expresses duration, e.g. "Toukyou ni isshuukan ita" = "(someone) was in Tokyo for a week") when you use "mae" to mean "ago".

    Check your facts before you show off :).

  64. Testosterone. by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2
    I don't think this is correct. I believe that the correlation involves stability of levels of testosterone: aggressive behavior is correlated with unstable levels of testosterone, and an absence of aggressive behavior is correlated with stable levels - this is true, at least, in chimps and some other simians, in the study I saw.

    Also, correlation doesn't indicate causality - there are a lot of other possible factors at work. It is true, for example, that individuals who are given testosterone supplements as part of some treatment or other (include female-to-male transexuals) report an increase in aggressive feelings.

  65. Re:saw one ni nen mae.. I mean, 2 years ago by Broccolist · · Score: 1

    Oops. -nen is an exception to that rule, sorry. Never mind.

  66. Larry Micheal by rosewood · · Score: 1

    Wasnt this on pay per view done by Larry Micheal of westwood one radio? Wtf? I DO

  67. I remember this from years ago by jonnystiph · · Score: 1
    About a good five or six years ago, I remember hanging out with some fellow geeks, watching underground videos of these wars. I hadn't heard of anything about it since that Malcom in the Middle episode.

    So needless to say I am ecstatic to see it back, and in regular format. Now I just need to justify getting cable... :)

    --

    If we don't make light of everything, we are just stumbling in the dark - Blank

  68. Buy a TiVo! by Otto · · Score: 2

    And fast forward through the tripe to the meat of the program. I watched the whole 'content' of the preview episode in about 10 minutes.

    Hopefully the later episodes won't be as stupid. I love the concept though.. Very cool.

    ---

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  69. saw one ni nen mae.. I mean, 2 years ago by denshi · · Score: 1
    ...and I don't remember signing any wavers. Although the earplugs came as part of the ticket price.

    Now these guys are definitely bad, no question. The coolest thing, IMHO, is that they'll take a few weeks to set up a show, in which time they'll take volunteers from the community to help build their implements of destruction -- then they'll destroy it all. Fun!

  70. Re:Wonderful!... But still... by hawk · · Score: 2

    > American programme

    no, it would be a British programme bassed on an American program. Where's the grammar nazi now that we need them.

    Hmm, if it's about the British usate, does he become the gramarre naze?

    :)

  71. BattleBots... by fenix+down · · Score: 1
    Pro Wrestling for Nerds.

    It's cool. Just like WWF, but fewer scantily dressed sweaty fat guys. Oh yeah, and more whirling blades of imminent death. I wonder if Caltech or Carnagie Mellon will get into this. I just hope somebody's robotics dept. doesn't sweep everybody out.
    Danger! Rambling! Danger!

  72. Off Topic, but relevant by DragonMagic · · Score: 1

    Already submitted and rejected by the Slashdot team, ADV Films picked up FarScape, a sci-fi show on the Sci-Fi Channel's Friday Nights, for home video distribution. I can't fathom how this show cannot be news to these masses, but Battle Bots and ReBoot are considered headlines. (: They should all fit in the same genre, shouldn't they?

    Dragon Magic

    --

    Human nature is the same everywhere; the modes only are different. -- Earl of Chesterfield
  73. Nothing new under the sun. by Nanookanano · · Score: 1

    I am reminded of the ancient Japanese art of kite fighting.

    --
    "..don't you eat that yellow snow."
  74. Didja Miss It? It's on again at... by CritterNYC · · Score: 5

    If ya missed it, don't worry, one of the great things about Comedy Central is how often they rerun the episodes.

    The episode will be rerun as follows:

    Friday, Aug 25 8:00PM
    Saturday, Aug 26 10:00AM
    Saturday, Aug 26 5:00PM
    Saturday, Aug 26 11:00PM
    Sunday, Aug 27 11:30AM

    (All times EDT)

    BTW - Their Realvideo server is currently /.ed.

  75. Oh, you mean like this? by ptbrown · · Score: 1
    --
    Any sufficiently advanced civilization is indistinguishable from Gods.
  76. Different idea by sbergstrom · · Score: 2

    I know what Comedy Central is doing here.

    Under fire for removing Mystery Science Theater 3000 from their programming lineup, they need a clever way to reintroduce the show without blantantly admitting their bad choice in taking the show out of their schedule.

    Enter Tom Servo and Crow, the popular, wisecracking robots from MST3k.

    The programmers have the idea to place a show about robots on Comedy Central. On a later date, the 'bots from MST3k will fight it out, sparking a reason to bring the show back onto Comedy Central.

    They're geniuses.

    --

    Love, Stu
  77. tripe by Phexro · · Score: 2

    moderator warning: honest opinion follows. mod me down if you must, but at least read my post.

    jesus christ. this show is one of the most horrific pieces of crap i have ever seen.

    don't get me wrong; i really like the concept. i enjoyed robot wars the few times i've seen it. but you'd think that a geeky thing like building and fighting robots would be targeted at... well, geeks. battlebots seems to be in position to take a huge chunk out of the audience of the teletubbies.

    this show is like a terrible, terrible parody of the local 10 p.m. news crossed with "extreme" sports, lobotomized to attract the average american viewer. which means an iq approaching the single digits. after watching two minutes, i felt so ill that i had no choice but to turn it off. so extreme was my contempt for television in general after watching this asinine show, i went to take a bath and read a book.

    i hope they can do better for the real show, versus the "preview".
    --

    1. Re:tripe by KnightStalker · · Score: 2

      The show got much better if you had the patience to wait through the idiot Howie Mandell wannabe.

      I thought the ladybug was genius, myself. It got me thinking, what would the rules say about enclosing an opposing robot in a Faraday cage to prevent RF signals from reaching it. Technically, it's not electric and it's not actually *jamming* the signal...
      --

      --
      * And remember, it's spelled N-e-t-s-c-a-p-e, but it's pronounced "Mozilla."
  78. Re:Be an active viewer, please! by Wah · · Score: 2

    no kiddin', that was some pretty good tv.

    Now they just need to lose those commentators, and go get Madden. He wouldn't know the difference.

    --

    --
    +&x
  79. Re:robot wars anyone? by Afterimage · · Score: 3
    While there's more info from the battlebots site, Robot Wars was started way back, and was sponsored in large part by a record company (Priority?). The creator and his financial supporter ended up fighting over how Robot Wars was going to be handled, including Robot Wars UK. The two camps didn't want to go in the same direction and Priority ended up suing to put a hold on Robot Wars events that it didn't approve of.

    It ended up that one event that was to occur about two years ago in the Bay Area was cancelled, much to my roommates chagrin.

    BattleBots was the community response to the lack of an organized robotic combat arena. The community, largely, the Society of Robotic Combat, developed the rules currently in use with BattleBots.

    So, there may be similarities. I think what it comes down to is how the events were edited for TV. Tonight, what they had as the prelim events were part of the lightweight rounds, which were featured as much as the super heavys. The TV show seems like it is going to bypass the lightweights.

    After being in the audience for the taping, I'm so far less than statisfied with the way Comedy Central put the package together. There were a few errors in fact (the arena is made of Lexan, not plexiglass). Secondly, the announcers seem to be a little over eager and dramatic and stiff. Hopefully, this gets better as the show goes on.

    I also hope they won't edit too much of the matches. We were a tad surprised by how tight the editing seemed to be this evening.

    It was a great couple of days at Fort Mason for the taping. I just hope it translates well for television.

    --
    --Humpty Dumpty was pushed!
  80. Why is BattleBots on Comedy Central??? by Elmogoaty · · Score: 1

    I mean, what the hell? Is this whole thing just a joke or what? Why not ZDtv or ESPN2 or another station that actually has something in common with either technology or competition? Just though I'd point that out....

  81. US showing of Scrapheap/Junkyard by rjnerd · · Score: 1

    This is covered in more detail in the FAQ

    Quick summary: TLC is still making up their mind about showing the soon to debut 10 show British third season. (which among other things has us Yankee NERDS taking on some British teams). Calls to the network should help their decision. (oh yea, there are 7 episodes from years 1 and 2 that haven't been shown here either)

    They did commision the UK production company to make a seven show all-american series. Same pile of scrap, same crew, same caliber of challenge. They replaced Robert with an american comedian, and all the teams are from the US (and possibly Canada). They will show this sometime starting in January. (no, The NERDS aren't in that one, there is a real advantage to having done a show, so it wasn't fair for us to go up against a brand new team -- next year when they have the possibility of returning teams, we expect to have a go against our countrymen)

    --
    Organizer:New England Rubbish Deconstruction Society;The NERDS,first US team in the UK Scrapheap Challenge/Junkyard Wars
  82. Furbys and RobotWars by giznard · · Score: 1

    I can't really imagine a more devestating force than a helmeted Furby mounted on an RC holding a lance. Perferably the kind that only turns by going in reverse.

    --
    - Do your part to help conserve disk space, shorten your si
  83. Re:Gas and Liquid fuels allowed! by Kintanon · · Score: 2

    . Explosives or Flammable Solids - This includes, but is not limited to the following:

    DOT Class C devices

    Gunpowder/Cartridge Primers

    Military Explosives, etc.



    But a Flammable Gas/Flammable liquid isn't a flammable solid. So would a gass or liquid flamethrower be allowed? Spraying flaming goo all over your oponents control system could pretty much end it if there are any exposed wires...

    Kintanon

    --
    Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
  84. Change your preferences then by MemeRot · · Score: 1

    learn how to filter the stories so they don't show up on your page. until then don't complain. and if you don't want to read the story then dont. simple.

  85. Re:gee, thanks for the advance notice... by MemeRot · · Score: 1

    i know. i got so excited when i saw this story, wrote a bunch of people 'can i come over to your place to watch robots fight tonight?' and then look again and it was for last night. 30 seconds warning simply isn't enough. this could only help someone who was reading slashdot at that second.

  86. Other Machine Art groups. by rjnerd · · Score: 1

    In a similar vein, there is Kal's group, the Seemen, and (the efforts of just two people) The Large Hot Pipe Organ.

    On a somewhat gentler note, there is Kinetic Sculpture Racing (got its original start 30 years ago). There is also an annual "Art Cars" festival, but I don't have a link handy.

    BTW: One of the members of The NERDS, Geo has worked with SRL, and various european industrial art groups. He is rather proud of his building TK-1the worlds first, and only known wood fired, twin turbocharged, hot tub.

    --
    Organizer:New England Rubbish Deconstruction Society;The NERDS,first US team in the UK Scrapheap Challenge/Junkyard Wars
  87. Re:This Viewer's Reaction by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 2
    Having it simply be robot vs robot without hype or backstories would limit it to just techies. Like it or not, most people need a to latch on to a personality to stay interested.
    I certainly have no problems with backstories. I like the staff to point out strengths and weaknesses of the bots. I want the drivers / builders / designers (assuming they're not all the same person) interviewed. I want to know what their strategies were (sometimes this isn't entirely apparent when the best laid plans fail on the arena floor). I want the driver to comment when things went right or wrong. The bots are cool - the people behind them complete the story.

    Mindless banter, cheap jokes, "oh gosh aren't I dizzy" physical talent, and other gimics don't add value to this show.

    I can appreciate the producer's concern towards appealing to a larger audience than robot-loving geeks. And I'm more than happy to hear an announcer wax poetic about wanton mechanical destruction and the glee of flying debris. But many sports that fuse the human factor with mechanics and technology (various forms of motor racing come to mind) manage to capture an audience without taking notes from the WWF.

    Of course, I'm being fairly critical without giving the show a chance to prove it isn't all gimick - that it manages to strike an effective balance between "personality" and main event. I hope they manage it. I fear they won't.

  88. Re:Absolutely Awesome by bgheen · · Score: 1

    *- I have the testosterone level of a randy cabbage *
    Just wanted to let you know that studies have shown that people with low aggression usually have HIGH levels of testosterone. The ones that are aggressive, have low levels.

    --
    "when i needed you most, when i needed a friend, you let me down now, like i let you down then."
  89. correction, started in India. by Nanookanano · · Score: 1

    Good site here: www.csun.edu/~hfoao033/fighters.html

    --
    "..don't you eat that yellow snow."
  90. Re:why comedy central? by AndyL · · Score: 1

    The comedy is that they've made it into a parody of professional wrestling.

    I think that'll get old, but I'm sure they did it so they could stretch this out for a whole season by only showing 2 or 3 matches per episode.

    Personably I wish I could just see the whole thing from start to finish. With Much less commentary

  91. Remot Controll == Robot? by AndyL · · Score: 1

    This is prety cool, And some of these robots are very clever. But I can't help thinking this would be a lot more interesting if the robots were autonomous. Like Robot socer. That way the robots would not only have to be tough but also smart.

    1. Re:Remot Controll == Robot? by E-Tray · · Score: 1

      For our Finnish readers, this is something similar to Robot Soccer...it is a multiplayer Java game Mikrobotti

      Quote from the site:
      "Mikrobots are virtual robots, which are fighting against each other on the computer screen. Robots will fight alone or in teams. Mikrobots are directed with Java 1.1 programming langugage and the robot logic and functions are preprogrammed with Java before the battle. When game has started, player can't help his/her robot anymore, but it's controlled only with it's own AI."

  92. Re:my analysis of this after a year o' Robot Wars. by Nonesuch · · Score: 1
    Wait until you actually see it- their 'preview' show sucked even more than you predict.

    "Robot Wars" is a great show, "Battle Bots" has all of the earmarks of American-TV... crap.

    USA has a very bad track record for adaptations of BBC shows.

  93. Keep the robots, dump the humans! by Nonesuch · · Score: 3
    Comparing this to the classic UK "Robot Wars", the Comedy Central show could be much better if they would just get rid of the stupid "sports announcer" guys on the cast. We don't want to see guys with too much hairspray talking like it is a football game, we want to see machines tear each other to shreds!

    I noticed right off that there is one major improvement in "Battle Bots" - weapons that actually work!

    The 'bots in "Robot Wars" tend to have wimpy little weapons and never do any real damage- saws that stop spinning the moment they come into contact with anything of real substance. Meanwhile, the first "Battle Bot" exhibition match has one robot literally tearing the other to pieces!

    That's what we like to see, total carnage!

    1. Re:Keep the robots, dump the humans! by padark · · Score: 1

      I'd agree on the wimpy weapons thing for the most part - that said, from the last series one of them had a huge bugger of a fly-wheel up front which caused absolute carnage iin its first round (thwo of its opponents were carried off in bin bags!). Not sure if you have this series yet in the states.... Much of the reasoning behind the limitation on weapon systems (no hardened blades for example) is down to crowd saftey - I say keep the crowds at home and bring on the explosive harpoons! padark

    2. Re:Keep the robots, dump the humans! by pldms · · Score: 1

      Indeed, there is a ban on hardened blades in Robot Wars (UK - or whatever) - but the reason was amply demonstrated last season when one team used one and it shattered. Ouch. The evil spinning flywheel was called hypnodisc. It's first two opponents (I swear!) were chosen for their particularly weak armour. Well, seemed like a coincidence to me ;-)

      --
      Slashdot looked deep within my soul and assigned
      me a number based on the order in which I joined
  94. Re:Comedy Central? by King+of+the+World · · Score: 1

    Damnit! I'm only interested in what Nader's running. Change your link!

  95. Re:Robot Wars? by luckykaa · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I noticed. They occasionally show clips of battlebots tournaments (or something similar) The robots actually do some serious damage.

    In Robot Wars, I've rarely seen a victor that didn't involve either a mechanical failure or being flipped.

  96. gee, thanks for the advance notice... by rob1imo · · Score: 1
    Posted by Hemos on Wednesday August 23, @10:30PM

    At least I'm not watching that that other stupid show...

    --

    --

    --

    1. Re:gee, thanks for the advance notice... by Leibherk · · Score: 1

      I dont see what people see in that show. for some starange reason maybe 80% of the people in my dorm hall had that show on..

      --
      "Maggie call Aquaman!!!"
  97. Absolutely Awesome by Chasuk · · Score: 2

    I'm not into anything macho at all - I have the testosterone level of a randy cabbage - but I think that Battlebots are the coolest things ever, and I want someone to open a Battlebot arena in my area NOW.

    I'd pay $25 an hour to get together with my friends and slam our avatar Battlebot-selves into each other, the vanquished paying for the beer afterwards!

  98. Gas and Liquid fuels allowed! by SEWilco · · Score: 1

    Ooh. Gas and liquid fuels are also allowed. There's a pressure limit on gases, and 10 oz of liquid fuels. I wonder how quickly a grinder uses up fuel...

    1. Re:Gas and Liquid fuels allowed! by Langley · · Score: 1

      There is another section stating that heat cannot be used as a waepon.

      I would assume flaming goo of any type would be disqualified under the heat-weapon clause

  99. RC car demolition derbies by rjnerd · · Score: 1

    Its funny, but I watched Junkyard Wars, and by the first commercial, knew that I had to be a part of it. Watching the robots was entertaining, but I didn't have an overwhelming need to start designing and building an entry.

    Its always the same problem, and you know about it in advance. There isn't a time limit on building the things. You don't have to improvise to suit the materials you can find. (and you don't get to see them getting built).

    If they were autonomous, it might be more interesting, but I have otherwise outgrown video games.

    Besides given a choice between a week in London, and a couple of days in Las Vegas, I will take London every time..

    --
    Organizer:New England Rubbish Deconstruction Society;The NERDS,first US team in the UK Scrapheap Challenge/Junkyard Wars
  100. it should stay by snyrt · · Score: 1

    battlebots is awesome, but it should stay on comedy central. i see the sport, but it's hilarious. i mean, i think it's geared towards all the people who sat around laughing their asses off when the ninja turtles kicked bebop's ass. i mean, it's funny to see someone, or something, get its ass completely whooped. i was laughing my ass off while i was admiring the sport. sure, it's a sport, and i'll follow it like mad, but i think it's hilarious. i'm surprised they don't have any guys sitting there programming these bots to fight on their own. then it'd quite entertaining. it'd be especially cool if they could somehow get some AI involved and teach the bots how to hold a grudge. and if there were more than 2 bots in the arena at a time it'd be pretty damn phat. the one thing i don't like is the lag between fights. i'd like it more if they could move from one fight to the next more quickly. maybe run 2 staggered rings. they could have one being cleaned while the other was fighting so they could move the ass kicking along faster.

    --
    -"Hey, Baby. It's not a rash, it's textured love."
  101. You're absolutely right. by StormDawg · · Score: 1

    I was disappointed to see that they have evidently decided to market BattleBots to kiddie crowd. Clearly they don't get the underlying coolness and unbridled geek factor but are going for the quick sell based on WWF-style spectacle. I'll probably hold my nose and try to watch anyway...

  102. robot wars anyone? by Ardric · · Score: 2

    does anyone know the difference between this and the bbc robot wars show? ive seen that one on PBS a few times, and from what i can see of this show, they seem pretty similar

    1. Re:robot wars anyone? by rwade · · Score: 1

      Robotwars is a rigged game show for children, while battlebots is a full-fledged competition with rules and all that other organizational stuff.

  103. put them all ona desert island.... by jailbrekr2 · · Score: 1

    and you'll have a run away hit.

    *sigh*

    --
    Feed The Need[goatse.cx]
  104. Re:Robot Wars? by mr.ska · · Score: 2
    Personally I'd be most interested in starting an aquatic robotics competition, but I haven't found enough people to compete with to attempt such a thing.

    That would be ultra cool.. except that it would be the same as on land, but everything has to be waterproof. ;)

    One cool thing I can see about underwater battle... a robot has 2 internal cavities, 2 electrodes... and produces their own hydrogen explosion underwater! Imagine literally blowing your opponent out of the water... COOL.

    --

    Mr. Ska

  105. This Viewer's and could have competitor's Reaction by rjnerd · · Score: 1

    As I said elsewhere, I watched, and didn't get the overwhelming urge to compete that Junkyard Wars/Scrapheap Challenge left me with. I simply had to enter a team to Scrapheap. Perhaps if I were 15 years younger, or hadn't seen Scrapheap first. But this does seem a fairly pale competitor, they are only solving the one problem, the only real physics taught is Ke=1/2mv^2, and thats done tacitly. Blendo's been built, and given the restrictions on projectiles, can't really be defeated, so why bother.

    This doesn't mean I won't watch (as long as they keep some semblance of tech amongst the hype) If nothing else, they need to find some "decorations" with brains. (they are scarce, but do exist).

    Things that might get me building one -- make them autonomous. If not autonomous, have them constructed on camera. (and yes, fever pitch construction can be GREAT tv, especially if you supply the builders large angle grinders).

    -dp-

    For those that haven't seen blendo, it was a manhole cover with a central undercarriage, that held the rim of the cover just above ground level, with a dome (heavy gauge WOK) welded to it. There were a couple of "teeth" fitted to the edge of the disk, and a 5hp or possibly 7.5hp gas engine to drive it (your basic briggs and stratton). Spun the "cover assembly" at >500rpm. Anything that tried to hit the spinning wok, got tossed aside, and anything presented to the teeth was digested. Its builder just had to drive it up to the other guy, and bits of robot were driven thru the safety cage. The two times it was run, they had to stop competition, and let the remaining 'bots battle for second.

    --
    Organizer:New England Rubbish Deconstruction Society;The NERDS,first US team in the UK Scrapheap Challenge/Junkyard Wars
  106. Comedy Central? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2

    Why is CC picking up stuff like this, is the Sci-Fi channel too busy showing softcore wanna be's like Lexx? Other than Sci-Fi's recent exposure series and that psychic guy (i love watching CSICOP disciples go into conniptions over him) that channel has been a magnificent failure and hopefully will go out of business and replaced with something interesting like that proposed anime/martial arts channel.

    1. Re:Comedy Central? by WinDoze · · Score: 1

      One of my favorite bits ever from The Onion was a mock-up TV schedule. The show that was playing on Sci-Fi in that schedule was "Space: 1972".

  107. ANARCHISTS UNITE!! by Nanookanano · · Score: 1

    Yea....right.

    --
    "..don't you eat that yellow snow."
  108. Re:vladinator GODDAMMIT by Vladinator · · Score: 1

    More times than you'll ever know... Not that it matters.

    I don't know how I'm posting at +1! My karma is still negative, and double digit negative at that. *Shrug*


    Fawking Trolls!

    --

    "Going to war without France is like going deer hunting without your accordion." - Jed Babbin

  109. Re:vladinator GODDAMMIT by MzTroLLziLLa · · Score: 1

    Wednesday night: Partly cloudy. Low 59. Light W winds. Thursday: A mix of sun and clouds. High 77. Winds N 5 to 10 mph. Thursday night: Partly cloudy. Low 53. Light NE winds. Friday: Areas of fog. High 81. Winds E 5 to 10 mph.

  110. Reality surpasses (game) Fantasy by the+wub · · Score: 2

    Did Anyone Play "One Must Fall"? This wast a fighting game between Human contrlled robots. Pretty much fun if you had nothing to do.

    I can't comment on the show as I'm in Germany, but the idea seems like the beginning of OMF in reality.

    I saw OMF a couple of days ago in an "abandonware" site. Abandon as in "officially declared Freeware", not "Warez under other name".

    Greetinx
    Aleks A.
    ---
    For a real millenial disaster, computer glitches cannot hold a candle to global warming.

    --
    For a real millenial disaster, computer glitches cannot hold a candle to global warming.
    (New Scientist)
  111. A few tips from Robot Wars UK by Paul+Johnson · · Score: 4
    I've watched a lot of the Robot Wars programs over here. Here is what I've learned:
    • Don't go up against the house robots. Well, I gather that actually there aren't any on Battlebots. This is silly. The house robots were what made RW UK work so well. Everybody loved watching the best competitors go up against a house robot and win! Also when two competitors got stuck together a house robot could move in and unjam things a bit.
    • Bet on wedge shaped robots with a flipper on the upper surface. The flipper will invert the opponent, and can also act as a self-righting mechanism.
    • Read the rules carefully. One team got disqualified for a saw blade that shattered.
    • Saws in general don't work: you need a target that will hold still for a while. By that time you've won anyway.
    • Pickaxes that come over the top can be effective, but they need to hit very hard, and often do little more than punch a small hole. They are also surprisingly difficult to aim accurately.
    • Tracks and chains often come off in combat. Avoid them. Also any tank-type steering mechanism is a tradeoff between traction and turning ability.
    • Car starter motors are cheap and powerful, but tend to burn out. Wheelchair motors are more expensive but have the necessary longevity.
    • You need a zero turning circle, high speed and high acceleration, but you also need fine control. Pay attention to your control circuit design.
    • After you have built your robot, pick it up and drop it a few times at various angles. Anything that breaks wasn't combat ready.
    • Big budgets matter less than ingenuity and good engineering.
    • Although deliberate RFI is banned, the studio is a noisy environment. Lots of robots turn out to be uncontrolable once they are in the arena.

    Paul.

    --
    You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
  112. Offensive Techno-Trash by Egotistical+Rant · · Score: 1

    Pardon my lack of enthusiasm, but...while I find these sorts of competitions fascinating when MIT or CalTech engineering students pit their problem-solving skills head-to-head using limited and identical resources, this "BattleBots" thing just strikes me as a glorified tractor pull for washed-up defense contractor employees who can't get laid and need an outlet for their aggression.

    Other competitions such as Sunrayce or the IHPVA events emphasize problem-solving through engineering finesse rather than brute force. What's more, these contests work to address pressing real-world issues. I see these testosterone-dripping remote-controlled chainsaws fighting for no good or purpose and can't help but think about the people in this country living in cardboard boxes. What are the Battle Bot builders hoping to prove? What are they doing that has lasting value in this world?

    It's low-brow entertainment under the guise of science. Pro wrestling with a metallic sheen. I would expect so much better from anybody with the brains to build one of these things.

  113. Re:Robot Wars? by radja · · Score: 2

    hmm.. that suddenly makes me wonder.. would whipped cream cakes make a suitable weapon? would they be solid enough to get out under the 'no liquids' rule? it's certainly tasteful.. and suitable for minors..

    --

    No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
    --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
  114. Re:eh by Darchmare · · Score: 2

    Huh? I guess you've had the pleasure to never have seen 'America's Funniest Home Videos'.

    You can't get through an episode without someone getting smashed in the crotch by something. Baseball bat, a baseball, etc. At least once per episode, usually more. The worst thing is that the show, or some derivitive thereof, has been running for YEARS.

    And people wonder why I don't watch much TV.


    - Jeff A. Campbell
    - VelociNews (http://www.velocinews.com)

    --

    - Jeff
  115. why comedy central? by option8 · · Score: 2

    i love this show, and i really dig that it's getting it's own slot instead of the usual two minutes each year on the local news that the past robot battle tournaments have gotten

    but shouldn't this be on scifi channel or something other than comedy central? i laugh at it, but i wouldn't consider it comedy..

    well, until the CC folks realize this, i'm going to laugh my ass off at some robots getting mauled

  116. Re:Robot Wars? by OrangeTide · · Score: 4

    No it is not. BattleBots occurs in the US (last one was in SF, I'm bummed cuz it was sold out by the time I found out about it). American robots tend to be larger and more dangerous, mostly due to the fact that too many americans have tons of money to throw at a hobby. Robot Wars is a great show, but the bots really are rather puny. (even the house robots). Check out some of the various events that are not televised and you'll see some pretty great robots.

    Nuts and Voltz magazine has articals from time to time about the results of robotic competitions (usually going over some of the more interesting robots, like a giant snack that can apply 900lbs of force with it's 3 piece jaw).

    Back in the early days, when there were no real restrictions. Robots would have thermite, dynamite and even raw sewage to attack opponents with. Unfortunetly few places allow such things anymore, mostly because some of the "old pros" lost fingers

    If anyone is interested in thier own robots. Please check out robohoo. It's a great little directory for robotics related things.

    Personally I'd be most interested in starting an aquatic robotics competition, but I haven't found enough people to compete with to attempt such a thing.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  117. I hope this help by jjr · · Score: 1

    I hope by being on Comedy Central it does not take away from the sport.

  118. Has anybody told MacAddict about this? by imac.usr · · Score: 3

    After all the effort put into the iBorg, I think they'd be afraid to enter it.

    (link probably only works during west coast business hours; search www.macaddict.com for iBorg for details or try this link)

    --
    I use Macs for work, Linux for education, and Windows for cardplaying.
  119. No EMP restrictions? by Captain+Pillbug · · Score: 1

    Or would that count as RF jamming?

  120. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  121. eh by Captain+Pillbug · · Score: 1

    The "comedy" part is provided by the idiot commentators. That, and the US is a nation that collectively finds it funny to watch someone get hit with a baseball bat in the testicles, so it's not hard to extrapolate to watching robots push each other over exposed circular saw blades.

  122. Lame by spagthorpe · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, but this gets me about as excited as watching some RC car race in the local supermarket parking lot. How about NON-CONTROLLED robots fighting it out? I would like to see a competition where the robots actually needed some brains to win. This is where the real competition lies. Otherwise, what's the point?

    --

    WWJD -- What Would Jimi Do?
    (Smash amp, burn guitar, take home the groupies)

  123. They Aren't Robots! by rossz · · Score: 1

    The so-called Robot Wars do not involve a single proper robot. They are all directed by radio controls.

    A true robot would be let loose in the ring and would need to survive solely on its contruction and internal programming. Do a poor job of debugging and watch your robot suffer a system crash, a rather embarassing way to lose.

    The Lego Mindstorm Robot competitions involve real robots. They may not have chainsaws and flamethrowers, but some rather slick programming is needed to win.

    The RobotWar creatures are very cool, but they aren't robots.

    --
    -- Will program for bandwidth
  124. Another show i can't see by feanaro · · Score: 1

    Is there any way to watch all these shows slashdot is mentioning outside of the USA? A nice unknown satelite perhaps? or an internet broadcaster? Anything? It is realy annoying to hear about just another show I can never see!

  125. Survival Research Laboratories by guynorton · · Score: 1

    No article on battling robots is complete without a link to Survival Research Laboratories.

    http://www.srl.org/

    ...random quote: "......such as the Finger, with its spinning-split titanium sphere, the Air Launcher, Christians pneumatic Claw, People Hater's Dual Picture Slamming Machines, etc. assaulted each other and whomever in the audience cared (or dared) to venture into the bulletproof plastic-covered parlor room. On the floor, a Swarmer with a spinning mummified dog head paraded about, as a mechanized survivalist hermit occasionally burst from his shack and sprayed the room with automatic gun fire, responding violently to disturbances such as the Rail Gun which showered his abode with molten metal....."

    Scary/Inspired/Insane/Cute

    all the best, Guy

    1. Re:Survival Research Laboratories by warsawza · · Score: 1

      That seems to be a perfectly sensible way to do it... the difference between that and battlebots would be the analog of the difference between the WWF and pitfighting?

  126. Level of the Room by Rogain · · Score: 1

    Battlebots = MIT techie guys + Pro Wresting

    Be embarrassed, be very embarrassed!

    --
    The current Slashdot moderation system is made by gay communists!
  127. This Viewer's Reaction by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 2
    I caught the primer episode tonight and have come away with a generally positive reaction - with some caution. The trouble is, its hard to decide on first glance. Battlebots has a good basis, but I'm concerned with some of the personalities that are bundled with the show. But then, this could all be a matter of editing. Future episodes will decide.

    The Good - environment.

    Battlebots has the right environment. Simple and elegant.

    While the backdrop isn't nearly as impressive as the set of Robot Wars (heck - the title animation is amateurish compared to Robot War's but I digress...), it provides a function that limited Robot Wars. Safety. The enclosed arena of Battlebots seems to allow much more powerful robots and weapons systems without endangering spectators. This should pay off with some amazing action. Tonight's match between Backlash and Disposable Hero demonstrated the possibilities - parts flew through the air as Backlash dismantled DH.

    The Battlebots arena is also all about the contestant bots. Two bots pitting engineering, design, and driving skill against their respective opponent. No well funded house bots. No obstacle course. Battlebots is not Robot Wars (though I think both formats are great). Battlebots DOES have a nice layout of hazards such as retractable floor saws, spikes, and ramps to keep the action going and provide another way for a robot to dispatch its opponent and rack up points.

    The Bad - personalities.

    I'm worried about Battlebot's human personalities. There's a whole team of on-screen personalities running around the show - I'm almost worried we won't have enough time in each episode to watch the bots.

    We have the announcers - neccisary, but with too much NFL for my taste. Of course, it could have been worse. They could throw in a heaping measure of WWF. I don't want hyperbole and hype here - tell me whats going on and some interesting facts about the bots and get out of the way.

    We have the female... talent. The physical draw. Her claim to a personality slot? She's a Baywatch babe. And in the short clips she's busy dropping innuendo and playing the ditz. Robot Wars had a cutie to walk the pits... but I tend to remember her as keeping her wits about her.

    Bill Nye also looks to be roaming the pits with a penchant for techno speak. I hope he has something good to say - an eye for the engineering challenges the bot designers face and overcome. As one of the designers just stared at Bill blankly, I began to fear Bill Nye, Science Guy is there to fill dead air with techno babble. That would be a shame.

    The Brothers did a bit involving interviewing the public with a "bot on the street". I hope they bring something interesting to the show. The fear here is that they'll fill up space with cheesy banter while we patiently wait for what we came to see - bots.

    The Ugly - Production

    The whole show, of course, hinges on the production and editing. I can almost hear the whispers in the Producer's ears: "Its metallic WWF!" Resist the Dark Side. Battlebots doesn't need to layer on hype. It doesn't need gimmicks. It has plenty of material in the robot battle, the design and engineering of the bots, and finally the individuals who've designed and drive their mechanized agents of mayhem. And there will be plenty of debris.

    Will I watch the show? Definitely. What they've done with the material they have will decide how long I continue to do so.

  128. Nice Apples, but lookie those oranges! by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 2
    As I said elsewhere, I watched, and didn't get the overwhelming urge to compete that Junkyard Wars/Scrapheap Challenge left me with.
    I have to agree - Scrapheap definately presents THE show for on-the-fly engineering. It is simply amazing that by the end of the show, teams are able to present a device that actually DOES the challenge task. Even more amazing when both teams produce entries that compete. As an aside, I saw you guy's video entry - how a sewing machine works. Really cool. Good luck!

    Of course, the combative robot arena shows and Junkyard Wars are completely different formats. Apples and Oranges. Some will prefer one or the other. Me... I'd like a fruit salad of Robot Wars, Battlebots, with maybe Junkyard Wars / Scrapheap Challenge to space the two apart. Mmmmm.

  129. Re:Wonderful!... But still... by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2

    And the British show Scrapheap Challenge (which may or may not be based on an American programme) is co-presented by Robert Llewellyn (Kryten). It's similar to Robot Wars in some ways, having teams which have to build machines and then compete. (Scavenge for junk and use it to build a land yacht or whatever within ten hours.)

    So what will the remaining Dwarf cast be presenting?

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  130. Re:Wonderful!... But still... by Grab · · Score: 1

    You've obviously not been watching it then! Cassius and Chaos2 both had wicked air rams which would flip another robot over - it's now quite a popular design. They also had the neat trick of being able to back-flip to right themselves if they got flipped.

    There's no trick to sending motors and speed controllers flying - all you need for that is to be competing against a shoddily-built robot!

    It does seem to be rather "me too". Robot Wars started as a niche show in the UK, and spread by word of mouth rather than by any publicity. Now it's popular, suddenly the networks are saying "oh, we can make some money off this". Maybe it's like Gladiators, it needs the Brits to get involved b4 you get anything decent out of it!

    Grab.

  131. Be an active viewer, please! by abischof · · Score: 4
    I'm watching this show right now, and it's really cool :). Unfortunately, the networks tend to be kinda stupid in this regard -- all the cool shows like this always seem to go off the air.

    So, please write to Comedy Central, or even advertisers, to tell them how much you like the show :). I think that's the only hope we'll have of keeping the show around.

    Alex Bischoff
    Interested in building a roof over your cubicle?
    ---

    --

    Alex Bischoff
    HTML/CSS coder for hire

  132. Wonderful!... But still... by hypergeek · · Score: 5

    Warning: Incoherent Mumbling Rant

    Purpose: Unknown

    I think it's great and all that they're doing such a potentially fun/edgykayshunull program... but still...

    Robot Wars had that guy from Red Dwarf!

    What's Battlebots got to beat that, huh?

    In the words of Scott Evil: "*Cough* *Cough* *Ripoff!*"

    Not that I think the show's a bad idea... just that it ought to have something to differentiate it-- y'know... like an Iron Chef bonus round or something (with the chefs made from real iron!)

    See, when you take the time and effort to blatantly rip off two cult TV hits, then you're actually doing the viewer a service, by compressing two shows down to a manageable 30 minute time slot, thereby freeing up everybody's time to go play Networked Pong ("what's your Pong ping?")

    Then again, I hope they don't recycle too many TV favorites... I mean, if Comedy Central gets real cheap, then we might end up watching a gruesome, lopsided deathmatch as some hulking, firebreathing, multiple-chainsaw-propeller-wielding chrome behemoth Mech's mammoth shadow looms over the cowering, doomed duo of Servo and Crow!

    Eep!

    Okay, I promise... this is the second-to-last time that I check the Slashdot headlines right after drinking 2 bottles of generic store brand cola! (From now on, just 1 case of Red Bull oughta last me a whole week!)

    Mmmm... now bring on the educational robotic violence!....

    --
    Stay up hacking each weekend. Sleep is for the week.
  133. Survival Research Laboratories by SydBarrett · · Score: 5

    I think Survival Research Laboratories has been doing this kind of stuff longer than anyone( since 1979), except that they do only shows (kinda like a circus). They even have videos for sale. The last time I heard of one of their shows, you had to sign a waiver to see the show in case you got injured by pieces of flying metal or something.

    Check it out at:
    www.srl.org