In IN, they are OVER whatever lane they control. (They were in the 90's at least)
I am going too guess that factors such as primary weather patterns (sunny vs cloudy, etc.) cause different states to do things differently. That, and the arbitrary and dumb state legislators.
They are using sloped lenses, bottomless covers, etc.
It doesn't really help much when you get 2 inches of sticky blown snow an hour.
That said, even the REGULAR lights were all covered in snow. EVERYTHING was covered in snow after this storm, windows, buildings, trees, slow moving old people... everything.
This is a stupid non-issue. It was a bad snowstorm, not some failure of the light design. Just because some two-bit reporter listened to some dumb county worker and put up some story is not a reason to panic over a good light design.
Lastly, if you are too 'tarded to be wary and slow down upon coming up on an intersection with big yellow poles at the corners with no lights visible, stay off the fucking road.
To American funded Irish republican terrorism. The bins were removed after Warrington in 1993 -- where American funded Irish republican terrorists blew up a bin in a town centre, outside a McDonalds, the day before mothers day. Then when people were fleeing away, blew another bomb up in the direction they were fleeing. Christofacist religious republican voting extrimist funded Irish republican terrorists murdered two innocent children on that day.
One of the boys fathers, Colin Parry, later shook hands with Gerry Adams. It'd be like a 9/11 victim shaking hands with Osama bin Laden.
Corrected that it's a little more intellectually honest. It's not like Bush wrote them a fucking check or anything.
Furthermore, the handshake took place upon a new status quo of more peaceful relations. Celebration at the end of violence is not a problem you stupid eurotrash weenie.
The way I see it, the only end-game is for advertisers to work closely with site owners so that ads are integrated with the content in such a way that software cannot distinguish the ads from the content.
For 8 years running, the entire fucking federal government ignored the 4th amendment, which may very well be continuing. This is not some sort of extra paragraph that has to be stricken from court records. It's rampant, it's all over. FISA means nothing to you? The fact that it is a sufficient way to get wiretaps on the bad guys, but NO! It's not ENOUGH, we need REAL TIME monitoring of EVERYBODY (with AT&T's help).
You don't see it because you are one of them. Strange, how every cop or wannabe cop is always willing to say "i never seen nobody do nuthin' wrong" and yet there are still lots of abuse by authorities going on. You see things going right because you want to. And like every other shitbag cop, everybody else is automatically wrong, their complaints are invalid, and you are pure.
So eat a bowl of dick, some of us see through your apologist cop shit.
You can buy a "book for the blind" (paper form) and lend or give it to your friend overseas. Just like I can do the same with a paperback I buy.
With an E-book (whatever form) you have the same rights (DRMed to hell or an illegal electronic copy) as the rest of us. It goes with the reader and you are not given the right to transfer it. Same as me.
You don't want the same rights, you want SPECIAL EXTRA RIGHTS.
So you are lying.
FURTHERMORE, you make yourself look like a lying whining douchebag asking for this. Just pirate the shit like the rest of us, and use the plain text in whatever reading device you use. If you really want to act like the un-damaged people, just torrent it. Duh.
They expect a fair deal, until it is convenient for them not to expect a fair deal to benefit them in some way others cannot get, extra time on a test, a ride during a golf tournament, free books.
You are confusing copyright and the right to COPY a book with the right of a person to sell that book used. Which is completely intellectually dishonest.
Top that off with the fact that every blind person I have ever met has been a raging, standoffish asshole (except when manning the "give us money" table at the mall). You seem to fit right in. All me me me me me me. Zero sympathy from me buster.
I have done some of my best technical work drunk. Once I laid out a fourteen page Visio diagram for the whole provisioning process AT&T was using for the big data trunks, in a bar, with pitcher in front of me, being consumed by me and refilled when necessary. (This was in 1997, they have changed the process since then.) Granted that was documentation, but the document lasted for several years afterward as a training tool, and reference for the pointy-hairs.
Drunk only counts if you have to talk to some douche who wants to whine about his email being down. If you follow best practices making backups and "un-dos" on the way like you should ALL the time, it's not a problem.
The problem with your paranoia is that information is a tool that does far far more damage to "bad" type governments (theocracies, dictatorships, oligarchies, etc.) than it does to democracies (or democratic republics or other "good" type governments).
Unlike other weapons systems, information has preferential kill for the stuff you want to kill. Nukes, cluster bombs, bat-bombs, land mines, and AKs don't, they can be used to destroy anybody. Information, even semi-truthful information only hurts the bad guys.
So, this is one of those cases where you are getting your panties in a bunch over WHO is doing it, and not WHAT they are doing. If this were a Facebook project or some sort of flash-mob or other garbage nobody would even bring up "nefarious purposes" because it would just be a weekend diversion for the kiddies. As it turns out, diversions for the kiddies can be used to help topple brutal dictatorships.
No you are not the only one to see "nefarious" plot in it, lots of other moon bat non thinking "liberals" thought the same thing and they are just as wrong as you are.
Actually there has been a fair amount of press discussing how...
In your comment, you are using a very common tactic that Fox News uses in its "reporting". It is common to hear on Fox News that "People are saying..." something. They seldom if ever mention who those "people" are. Is it an important official? Or the reporter's wife? Or just some guy they overheard on the street? Or the manager of their department? This is a deceptive and unethical tactic that propagates innuendo and rumor while wiping out logical reasoning and fact. Examples like this are seldom if ever seen on the broadcasts of organizations like the BBC.
Glenn Beck has not denied raping and murdering a young girl in 1990. If he didn't do it, why won't he deny it?
On the contrary, this tool is an illustration of what happens when the threshold for looking stuff up becomes sliding a mouse across a desk between mouthfuls of doughnut.
The issue is precisely that the threshold is low, and that it is used because the threshold is low, and now what "anyone in the government gives a flying fuck" is not "murdered four cops" but rather "looked cute in the DMV line last week."
If being tracked was not important, even on a silly, superficial level, why did you post anonymously? Hmmm?
So, does math and A=A work differently in your neighborhood?
How about heat plus fuel plus oxygen, does that make combustion in your world?
What does the local community bring to the table aside from where to get the cheap 6 pack, the quickie mart or 7-11?
Oh, I know. You can get your local community to draft a proposal to the school board about how to cook meth a bit more discreetly. That will work nicely.
Look, retard, if we'all didn't feed your stupid texas ass a few vitamins once in a while you all would have cooked to death dying on the red soil down there. You can thank science for that, and not bother dippin your ten gallon at the locals because they din' do shit to produce no book learnin.
There are no rational christians, if there were, they would not be christians.
If you were a REAL christian, nobody would know you were. Jesus himself told your ilk to pray in a closet, or didn't you read that far?
Not only are you simply dumb, you are a goddamn heathen hypocrite. You can't even get your own myths right and you want to dictate what science is taught in the classroom? How about a big ol'pile of NO to go with that okra?
If you practice rational thought, you are not a christian. Period. You cannot do both. You obviously do not believe in rational thought.
Please disengage until you find a thread about yet another image of Jesus under an overpass. It suits your intellect better.
"The world" does the same thing we do with movies you fucking moron.
They sit on the couch (or in the theater) stick a beer in one hand and the thumb up the ass from the other hand and watch some flashy story.
Your elitist bullshit does not define what movies are; if you don't like movies, don't watch them or make your own.
"too hard to judge because it's open to opinions"? WTF commie shit is that? You going to have a Ministry of Art that dictates to everyone what to enjoy for art?
Slashdot Mirror
So, a placental sandwich is not cannibalism then?
That sure would have helped acquit in my stalking case....
Where the lights go varies from state to state.
In WI, they are at the corners or in the medians.
In IN, they are OVER whatever lane they control. (They were in the 90's at least)
I am going too guess that factors such as primary weather patterns (sunny vs cloudy, etc.) cause different states to do things differently. That, and the arbitrary and dumb state legislators.
They are using sloped lenses, bottomless covers, etc.
It doesn't really help much when you get 2 inches of sticky blown snow an hour.
That said, even the REGULAR lights were all covered in snow. EVERYTHING was covered in snow after this storm, windows, buildings, trees, slow moving old people... everything.
This is a stupid non-issue. It was a bad snowstorm, not some failure of the light design. Just because some two-bit reporter listened to some dumb county worker and put up some story is not a reason to panic over a good light design.
Lastly, if you are too 'tarded to be wary and slow down upon coming up on an intersection with big yellow poles at the corners with no lights visible, stay off the fucking road.
To American funded Irish republican terrorism. The bins were removed after Warrington in 1993 -- where American funded Irish republican terrorists blew up a bin in a town centre, outside a McDonalds, the day before mothers day. Then when people were fleeing away, blew another bomb up in the direction they were fleeing. Christofacist religious republican voting extrimist funded Irish republican terrorists murdered two innocent children on that day.
One of the boys fathers, Colin Parry, later shook hands with Gerry Adams. It'd be like a 9/11 victim shaking hands with Osama bin Laden.
Corrected that it's a little more intellectually honest. It's not like Bush wrote them a fucking check or anything.
Furthermore, the handshake took place upon a new status quo of more peaceful relations. Celebration at the end of violence is not a problem you stupid eurotrash weenie.
The way I see it, the only end-game is for advertisers to work closely with site owners so that ads are integrated with the content in such a way that software cannot distinguish the ads from the content.
We have that already. It's called CNet.
For 8 years running, the entire fucking federal government ignored the 4th amendment, which may very well be continuing. This is not some sort of extra paragraph that has to be stricken from court records. It's rampant, it's all over. FISA means nothing to you? The fact that it is a sufficient way to get wiretaps on the bad guys, but NO! It's not ENOUGH, we need REAL TIME monitoring of EVERYBODY (with AT&T's help).
You don't see it because you are one of them. Strange, how every cop or wannabe cop is always willing to say "i never seen nobody do nuthin' wrong" and yet there are still lots of abuse by authorities going on. You see things going right because you want to. And like every other shitbag cop, everybody else is automatically wrong, their complaints are invalid, and you are pure.
So eat a bowl of dick, some of us see through your apologist cop shit.
Was the entire HR department in jail and tied up with no pens or paper at the time as well?
He had no lawyer who could speak for him? If he didn't he didn't bother to exercise his rights.
You just want to excuse him and don't give a shit if he was wrong or not.
No. One way he loses because he did something wrong and criminal.
The other way he loses because someone ELSE does something wrong and corrupt.
Which one of these "way you lose" will determine if you are "a good guy" or "a bad guy".
This is pre-school level ethics here moron. Figure it out already.
This really comes down to;
Is Nick Burns a dick, or is he not a dick?
That's it. Pick your camp and fuck off. There is really nothing else to discuss, there is no middle ground.
No, no they cannot. Stop lying.
You can buy a "book for the blind" (paper form) and lend or give it to your friend overseas. Just like I can do the same with a paperback I buy.
With an E-book (whatever form) you have the same rights (DRMed to hell or an illegal electronic copy) as the rest of us. It goes with the reader and you are not given the right to transfer it. Same as me.
You don't want the same rights, you want SPECIAL EXTRA RIGHTS.
So you are lying.
FURTHERMORE, you make yourself look like a lying whining douchebag asking for this. Just pirate the shit like the rest of us, and use the plain text in whatever reading device you use. If you really want to act like the un-damaged people, just torrent it. Duh.
See. He wants it EASY. EASY access. EASILY purchased.
You don't want the same access, you want EASY access. And are ready to break the law to do it.
I do the same thing, I much prefer to get pirated copies because well, if it turns out to be crap I am just out time and a bit of bandwidth.
But _I_ dont sugar coat what I am doing as some sort of right.
They expect a fair deal, until it is convenient for them not to expect a fair deal to benefit them in some way others cannot get, extra time on a test, a ride during a golf tournament, free books.
You are confusing copyright and the right to COPY a book with the right of a person to sell that book used. Which is completely intellectually dishonest.
Top that off with the fact that every blind person I have ever met has been a raging, standoffish asshole (except when manning the "give us money" table at the mall). You seem to fit right in. All me me me me me me. Zero sympathy from me buster.
Your list is old or BS.
The top deaths on the job is pizza or food delivery guy. They get shot by robbers at a rate that far surpasses the death rate of Fishermen.
I can imagine he probably goes through a crapload of toilet paper too.
Being muscular might not be worth spending half your life eating, not being able to sleep because you have to eat, and then the rest on the crapper.
I have done some of my best technical work drunk. Once I laid out a fourteen page Visio diagram for the whole provisioning process AT&T was using for the big data trunks, in a bar, with pitcher in front of me, being consumed by me and refilled when necessary. (This was in 1997, they have changed the process since then.) Granted that was documentation, but the document lasted for several years afterward as a training tool, and reference for the pointy-hairs.
Drunk only counts if you have to talk to some douche who wants to whine about his email being down. If you follow best practices making backups and "un-dos" on the way like you should ALL the time, it's not a problem.
Can't Stop the Signal.
The problem with your paranoia is that information is a tool that does far far more damage to "bad" type governments (theocracies, dictatorships, oligarchies, etc.) than it does to democracies (or democratic republics or other "good" type governments).
Unlike other weapons systems, information has preferential kill for the stuff you want to kill. Nukes, cluster bombs, bat-bombs, land mines, and AKs don't, they can be used to destroy anybody. Information, even semi-truthful information only hurts the bad guys.
So, this is one of those cases where you are getting your panties in a bunch over WHO is doing it, and not WHAT they are doing. If this were a Facebook project or some sort of flash-mob or other garbage nobody would even bring up "nefarious purposes" because it would just be a weekend diversion for the kiddies. As it turns out, diversions for the kiddies can be used to help topple brutal dictatorships.
No you are not the only one to see "nefarious" plot in it, lots of other moon bat non thinking "liberals" thought the same thing and they are just as wrong as you are.
Who's "WE" paleface? BUSH left them out to dry.
Stormfront is that way asshole ---->
In your comment, you are using a very common tactic that Fox News uses in its "reporting". It is common to hear on Fox News that "People are saying..." something. They seldom if ever mention who those "people" are. Is it an important official? Or the reporter's wife? Or just some guy they overheard on the street? Or the manager of their department? This is a deceptive and unethical tactic that propagates innuendo and rumor while wiping out logical reasoning and fact. Examples like this are seldom if ever seen on the broadcasts of organizations like the BBC.
Glenn Beck has not denied raping and murdering a young girl in 1990. If he didn't do it, why won't he deny it?
I don't think he would come back.
There's still that little "raped a girl in 1990 issue to clear up" you know.
On the contrary, this tool is an illustration of what happens when the threshold for looking stuff up becomes sliding a mouse across a desk between mouthfuls of doughnut.
The issue is precisely that the threshold is low, and that it is used because the threshold is low, and now what "anyone in the government gives a flying fuck" is not "murdered four cops" but rather "looked cute in the DMV line last week."
If being tracked was not important, even on a silly, superficial level, why did you post anonymously? Hmmm?
This seems like an ideal tool if you want to have a drop-in solution for a zombie network to host illegal or pirated shit all over the internet.
Runs on cruddy already infected hardware! Perfect for Grandma Gertrude and Grandpa Horace to have hidden in their computers.
Feature set of this thing seems like a newer version of that pile of crap ORielly WebSite Pro.
Stay away... this dude doesn't want to kill IIS, he wants to kill every windows install anywhere on the planet.
So, does math and A=A work differently in your neighborhood?
How about heat plus fuel plus oxygen, does that make combustion in your world?
What does the local community bring to the table aside from where to get the cheap 6 pack, the quickie mart or 7-11?
Oh, I know. You can get your local community to draft a proposal to the school board about how to cook meth a bit more discreetly. That will work nicely.
Look, retard, if we'all didn't feed your stupid texas ass a few vitamins once in a while you all would have cooked to death dying on the red soil down there. You can thank science for that, and not bother dippin your ten gallon at the locals because they din' do shit to produce no book learnin.
Who the fuck says I am a liberal?
Did I say that?
You associate conservatism with RETARDATION.
Your own post says it, and well I don't disagree.
There are no rational christians, if there were, they would not be christians.
If you were a REAL christian, nobody would know you were. Jesus himself told your ilk to pray in a closet, or didn't you read that far?
Not only are you simply dumb, you are a goddamn heathen hypocrite. You can't even get your own myths right and you want to dictate what science is taught in the classroom? How about a big ol'pile of NO to go with that okra?
If you practice rational thought, you are not a christian. Period. You cannot do both. You obviously do not believe in rational thought.
Please disengage until you find a thread about yet another image of Jesus under an overpass. It suits your intellect better.
"The world" does the same thing we do with movies you fucking moron.
They sit on the couch (or in the theater) stick a beer in one hand and the thumb up the ass from the other hand and watch some flashy story.
Your elitist bullshit does not define what movies are; if you don't like movies, don't watch them or make your own.
"too hard to judge because it's open to opinions"? WTF commie shit is that? You going to have a Ministry of Art that dictates to everyone what to enjoy for art?