These leaks reveal there _are_ no more "trusted journalists."
Just like Snowden's information revealed there shouldn't be trust in government, now we know the same about journalists.
Would you assert that Snowden should have "released" his information back to the government? Because that's the logical equivalence of the assertion he should have used journalists for Assange.
link to one of the emails with a credit card number in it. This has been repeated several times but I have never been able to find one.
I found some that had SSNs in them. But no credit card numbers. I am suspicious.
It's against the rules to link to them on most sites, even here. Also, there is an ethical issue with it.
I have seen these, and it's true. Also, check images, and spreadsheets with name, dob, address, phone number and SSN on them.... along with illegal donation amounts. Search the archive for xlsx and xls files and you might find some.
There is a lot of projection going on in the lefties camp.
Of the two parties, only one actually got caught with proof they used racial disparaging terms in private emails. (Talking about the "brand loyal taco bowl" comments about hispanics by the DNC.)
Democrats are mean, vicious and amoral assholes, and as a result think republicans are too. That's why they don't want guns around, they know their kind would use them to commit crimes. (Heck they DO use them for that in the inner cities.) A republican takes his gun out of the safe to hunt, or go to the range. A democrat takes his gun out of his pants to shoot other democrats.
She doesn't need press conferences. Did you miss the part where major news sources go to the DNC for "approval" on what they may or may not print about Clinton? Seeing as how that's WaPo, the DNC probably approved that very article.
An interesting attempt by them to appear unbiased, though.
More likely she can't do press conferences. She hasn't owned a high enough percentage of the "journalists" to guarantee she only gets softball questions.
She can't hack the pressure anymore. The little seizures, strokes, or whatever are catching up to her.
I fully expect to see her to drop with some medical reason right there on live TV. The debates aren't going to be about who "wins" they'll be about watching to see if the vessels in Hillary's head pop during the questions or not.
Assange has stated he has more, and more damming emails. It wouldn't be too hard to leave out the stuff they don't want us to know they know but still put out enough to hang Hillary with. We may not have to wait very long. They won't be as much use after the election.
Trump has never held an elective or appointive office in his entire life.
But there is damn little reason to believe that he is capable of playing by the rules or accepting responsibility for anything that goes wrong.
People like him in politics precisely _because_ he doesn't play by the political rules. The same rules that let Clinton sell favors from the State Department to foreign governments and businesses. Those rules are part of them problem.
It's not violating our national security, it would merely be violating a personal server. Remember....that's what we've been told.
What's the big deal? There were only yoga positions and muffin recipes on that server anyway. So there are now more flexible well-fed Russians. What difference does that make?
Bernie sold out for a handful of shekels
But don't you DARE call us racist.
Don't forget the airplane. I hope he hires some good technicians... or he may end up on the list of unfortunate deaths surrounding the Clintons. "Oops! I guess we forgot to put the hydraulic fluid back in that... think they can fly without the tail working?"
What the mother loving fuck? Can Slashdot editors READ? Is the data now in CURSIVE?
Oh, and your video doesn't say what you say it says.
Slashdot fucked the duck on this one.
Mis-quoted, taken out of context after letting the main stream media run it through their overlords at the DNC and you fucking droolers post this shit?
I hope your daddy lied to your mummy like that and actually did cum in her mouth.
And, that's also stacked on the unsubstantiated LIE that the Russians did the DNC hacks. Hello, I can make my computer type cyrillic characters, and I can use proxies or compromised devices in other countries. Does that make me Russian?
Milo aside, the "left wing echo chamber" part is correct.
Why would twitter grow any more? Any leftist that wants to echo is already on it? The remainder of people who aren't, aren't leftists and therefore won't join.
Twitter needs to figure out how to use ads to make money with the existing user base. They going to get any bigger.
The biggest improvement to safety from violence you can make is to move out of the USA. Not to buy a gun.
Actually, it's;
Don't be depressed. (#1 killer with guns)
Don't hang around criminals, or be one
Don't be male and black in the inner city, or hang around black males in the inner city
Avoiding either of those last two reduces the "risk of getting shot" by about 98%. Both, and it's closer to five nines percentages. There is still some latent risk, like from stray bullets, random robberies, negligent discharge, etc. I agree, if you have a tendency to be depressed, you shouldn't own a gun. (Goes for any other mental illness really.)
The FBI and CDC have stats that show this, go look them up. If you line up those rates with those of other countries, US beats most of europe as far is "no violence" most of the time especially if you count recent numbers after lots of immigration.
If you are a white, asian, or hispanic, not a dumbass and not a criminal, having a gun in the house makes no goddamn difference. And you can offset some of the "random robbery" risk to boot. (There are as many as 6 million "defend but no shoot" self defense actions every year. Guns work for that without firing a shot. Many of these are out and about though, so carry concealed or open. There arent many people counting these though, probably for political reasons. NRA has some stats somewhere if you want them.)
Lastly, if you move out of the USA all the positive aspects of a firearm go away, along with freedom of speech, freedom of religion and a bunch of other stuff.
So, basically, "don't be a dumbass" and all of a sudden your "risk of getting shot" drops precipitously.
Original series on Amazon has a bunch of new effects as well as the new scan. It looks very different, and has effects not present in the original series ever. These changes are for the better for the most part, and only a little distracting in a few spots.
For a design like that it should really have a ring of ultrasonic, infrared, camera, or similiar sensors affixed pointing around the radius of the robots tread path and set up to stop the robot if anything is projected to go under it.
It needs some of that.
Also, 16 months old is TOO YOUNG to even understand the robot is different than a garbage can. The parents are outright irresponsible in their actions.
If there is going to be a robot that interacts with children, it should be one specialized for that. Leave the security robot to do it's job. Entertain your dumb kid with something designed for kids. Hey! I know! Next take the kid to the free range pit bull farm!
You know, an obviously communistic idea in your sig line completely negates any validity your argument might have had. Better yourself to stay in place, better your ability to better yourself to get ahead. Do the same thing as you always did, and you are passed by.
I am eagerly awaiting the end of the stupid trend for websites to all look the same with the same gigantic blocky format in an attempt to "capture" the tablet market.
Every tablet can zoom, there's no need to dumb down the entire internet for them.
I fail to see how this is a troubling trend if its not based on any external force. Maybe men just studied harder and learned whatever skillset they needed better. Hell the only "troubling trend" is that women with subpar skills were hired more often when people knew they were women.
It isn't troubling.
This is showing what folks have been saying all along.
The study should be thrown out though, as the researchers are clearly biased and looking for more bullshit lies about "poor oppressed women because they are women" when the performance, knowledge, and hard work is the real difference. Nothing they can do further should be trusted, soon a "corrected" study will be out that results in demands for more favors for women.
Shipping companies did employ armed security that did indeed fire on pirates when the Somali problem was at its peak. You can find video on the web.
The big problem is the weapons you're carrying have to be legal in both the country you're shipping from and the country you're shipping to. Since so much of it was destined for Europe, where almost every weapon is illegal, your options are limited. Most of the security companies operating in that region had their own boats to move guards - they would board with their weapons in international waters and debark with their weapons in international waters.
They solved that problem by just throwing the weapons overboard. Half a dozen AR-15s, a couple rifles in.308 or 30-06 and 1k rounds for each is two day's pay for the guys doing security. A trivial extra cost.
Anyway, this is a self-inflicted problem. Africans are going to do that stuff. Letting it continue caused it to continue. Had they shot at the first dozen attempts there wouldn't be a problem at all.
Slashdot Mirror
These leaks reveal there _are_ no more "trusted journalists."
Just like Snowden's information revealed there shouldn't be trust in government, now we know the same about journalists.
Would you assert that Snowden should have "released" his information back to the government? Because that's the logical equivalence of the assertion he should have used journalists for Assange.
link to one of the emails with a credit card number in it. This has been repeated several times but I have never been able to find one.
I found some that had SSNs in them. But no credit card numbers. I am suspicious.
It's against the rules to link to them on most sites, even here. Also, there is an ethical issue with it.
I have seen these, and it's true. Also, check images, and spreadsheets with name, dob, address, phone number and SSN on them.... along with illegal donation amounts. Search the archive for xlsx and xls files and you might find some.
There is a lot of projection going on in the lefties camp.
Of the two parties, only one actually got caught with proof they used racial disparaging terms in private emails. (Talking about the "brand loyal taco bowl" comments about hispanics by the DNC.)
Democrats are mean, vicious and amoral assholes, and as a result think republicans are too. That's why they don't want guns around, they know their kind would use them to commit crimes. (Heck they DO use them for that in the inner cities.) A republican takes his gun out of the safe to hunt, or go to the range. A democrat takes his gun out of his pants to shoot other democrats.
Russia has actively influenced American politics since 1918.
This is the first time democrats have minded.
It's well known that reality has a very liberal bias.
There's proof of this in the DNC emails. Monetary payments, access as reward, and outright orders about what to write and when to release it.
She doesn't need press conferences. Did you miss the part where major news sources go to the DNC for "approval" on what they may or may not print about Clinton? Seeing as how that's WaPo, the DNC probably approved that very article.
An interesting attempt by them to appear unbiased, though.
More likely she can't do press conferences. She hasn't owned a high enough percentage of the "journalists" to guarantee she only gets softball questions.
She can't hack the pressure anymore. The little seizures, strokes, or whatever are catching up to her.
I fully expect to see her to drop with some medical reason right there on live TV. The debates aren't going to be about who "wins" they'll be about watching to see if the vessels in Hillary's head pop during the questions or not.
Partisan disillusion is the term you are looking for.
Sorta like the reality the Bernbots are now facing with "their guy" selling out.
Assange has stated he has more, and more damming emails. It wouldn't be too hard to leave out the stuff they don't want us to know they know but still put out enough to hang Hillary with. We may not have to wait very long. They won't be as much use after the election.
Trump has never held an elective or appointive office in his entire life.
But there is damn little reason to believe that he is capable of playing by the rules or accepting responsibility for anything that goes wrong.
People like him in politics precisely _because_ he doesn't play by the political rules. The same rules that let Clinton sell favors from the State Department to foreign governments and businesses. Those rules are part of them problem.
It's not violating our national security, it would merely be violating a personal server. Remember....that's what we've been told.
What's the big deal? There were only yoga positions and muffin recipes on that server anyway. So there are now more flexible well-fed Russians. What difference does that make?
Bernie sold out for a handful of shekels But don't you DARE call us racist.
Don't forget the airplane. I hope he hires some good technicians... or he may end up on the list of unfortunate deaths surrounding the Clintons. "Oops! I guess we forgot to put the hydraulic fluid back in that... think they can fly without the tail working?"
What the mother loving fuck? Can Slashdot editors READ? Is the data now in CURSIVE?
Oh, and your video doesn't say what you say it says.
Slashdot fucked the duck on this one.
Mis-quoted, taken out of context after letting the main stream media run it through their overlords at the DNC and you fucking droolers post this shit?
I hope your daddy lied to your mummy like that and actually did cum in her mouth.
And, that's also stacked on the unsubstantiated LIE that the Russians did the DNC hacks. Hello, I can make my computer type cyrillic characters, and I can use proxies or compromised devices in other countries. Does that make me Russian?
What a bunch of pathetic nonsense.
Milo aside, the "left wing echo chamber" part is correct.
Why would twitter grow any more? Any leftist that wants to echo is already on it? The remainder of people who aren't, aren't leftists and therefore won't join.
Twitter needs to figure out how to use ads to make money with the existing user base. They going to get any bigger.
Wow, dailykos and Huffpo really shilling for the DNC, huh? The number of hit pieces is pretty hilarious and transparent.
Where have you been? Under a rock? Those orgs started out biased and have never been anything else.
The biggest improvement to safety from violence you can make is to move out of the USA. Not to buy a gun.
Actually, it's;
Don't be depressed. (#1 killer with guns)
Don't hang around criminals, or be one
Don't be male and black in the inner city, or hang around black males in the inner city
Avoiding either of those last two reduces the "risk of getting shot" by about 98%. Both, and it's closer to five nines percentages. There is still some latent risk, like from stray bullets, random robberies, negligent discharge, etc. I agree, if you have a tendency to be depressed, you shouldn't own a gun. (Goes for any other mental illness really.)
The FBI and CDC have stats that show this, go look them up. If you line up those rates with those of other countries, US beats most of europe as far is "no violence" most of the time especially if you count recent numbers after lots of immigration.
If you are a white, asian, or hispanic, not a dumbass and not a criminal, having a gun in the house makes no goddamn difference. And you can offset some of the "random robbery" risk to boot. (There are as many as 6 million "defend but no shoot" self defense actions every year. Guns work for that without firing a shot. Many of these are out and about though, so carry concealed or open. There arent many people counting these though, probably for political reasons. NRA has some stats somewhere if you want them.)
Lastly, if you move out of the USA all the positive aspects of a firearm go away, along with freedom of speech, freedom of religion and a bunch of other stuff.
So, basically, "don't be a dumbass" and all of a sudden your "risk of getting shot" drops precipitously.
Original series on Amazon has a bunch of new effects as well as the new scan. It looks very different, and has effects not present in the original series ever. These changes are for the better for the most part, and only a little distracting in a few spots.
How are they going to know?
Think about that part, that's what they want. "Hey, we are just obeying the law by keeping you from ISIS by tracking everything you do online.
Don't pay us any mind.
Interesting how the leftist supporting large businesses are now being attacked by the leftist-socialists they support.
Reminds me of a quote "Watching someone shoot themselves in the boot is less amusing when said boot is on your neck."
Or cost cutting.
For a design like that it should really have a ring of ultrasonic, infrared, camera, or similiar sensors affixed pointing around the radius of the robots tread path and set up to stop the robot if anything is projected to go under it.
It needs some of that.
Also, 16 months old is TOO YOUNG to even understand the robot is different than a garbage can. The parents are outright irresponsible in their actions.
If there is going to be a robot that interacts with children, it should be one specialized for that. Leave the security robot to do it's job. Entertain your dumb kid with something designed for kids. Hey! I know! Next take the kid to the free range pit bull farm!
You know, an obviously communistic idea in your sig line completely negates any validity your argument might have had. Better yourself to stay in place, better your ability to better yourself to get ahead. Do the same thing as you always did, and you are passed by.
I am eagerly awaiting the end of the stupid trend for websites to all look the same with the same gigantic blocky format in an attempt to "capture" the tablet market.
Every tablet can zoom, there's no need to dumb down the entire internet for them.
WTF. Dude this guy had nothing to do with BLM. BLM came to be because of murder and violence not the other way around
He clearly stated to police before being blown up he was angry AT BLM.
His manifesto posted online also clearly states this.
Angry at the fact they lost focus and had let Sharpton sully the message, that they were not radical enough.
With his anger, he chose to shoot at white people.
They want to take away all your guns? Citation please. Most liberals want reasonable gun restrictions, not outright bans.
Lying cunt.
I fail to see how this is a troubling trend if its not based on any external force. Maybe men just studied harder and learned whatever skillset they needed better. Hell the only "troubling trend" is that women with subpar skills were hired more often when people knew they were women.
It isn't troubling.
This is showing what folks have been saying all along.
The study should be thrown out though, as the researchers are clearly biased and looking for more bullshit lies about "poor oppressed women because they are women" when the performance, knowledge, and hard work is the real difference. Nothing they can do further should be trusted, soon a "corrected" study will be out that results in demands for more favors for women.
Shipping companies did employ armed security that did indeed fire on pirates when the Somali problem was at its peak. You can find video on the web.
The big problem is the weapons you're carrying have to be legal in both the country you're shipping from and the country you're shipping to. Since so much of it was destined for Europe, where almost every weapon is illegal, your options are limited. Most of the security companies operating in that region had their own boats to move guards - they would board with their weapons in international waters and debark with their weapons in international waters.
They solved that problem by just throwing the weapons overboard. Half a dozen AR-15s, a couple rifles in .308 or 30-06 and 1k rounds for each is two day's pay for the guys doing security. A trivial extra cost.
Anyway, this is a self-inflicted problem. Africans are going to do that stuff. Letting it continue caused it to continue. Had they shot at the first dozen attempts there wouldn't be a problem at all.