No. You fill them with fuel. Like at a gas station.
Right, but the fuel must be created somehow-- like electrolysis. What I'm saying is that-- as far as I know-- you can't simply generate it from the energy recovered from braking. (Well, presumably you can, but you wouldn't want to.) This is a good reason to have a battery.
Come back when you understand the difference between disk caching and memory caching. So what if you've gone to more pages in FF? The files are cached to disk not memory.
In plain english, battery backup for a fuel cell would be redundant.
Okay, I know next to nothing about fuel cells, but charging them involves electrolysis or some other non-trivial process, yes? So you need a battery if you're going to take advantage of the energy to be gained back from stopping and such.
By what weird kind of logic does ripping a CD I own to my computer so that I can put the songs in a playlist, for example, have to do with "theft?" I have bought the music, and freedb was very convenient for me.
"China's system of statist capitalism is neatly breaking new ground in erasing the dividing line between what it means to rule a country and what it means to own a country."
I can't speak as to whether this is correct or not, but that doesn't look like new ground. It sounds like feudalism to me.
Ushers, especially on new release rated R films, would take tickets at the door and check IDs of everyone who looked under 30..... Working in the box office, I checked the ID of everyone under 30 - unless they were getting a student discount with a college ID.
And people under 30 still patronized this theater? I'm surprised.
I read that it was kind of old-fashioned; it's a way of avoiding "sacre Dieu" or "holy God."
The French, having a rather different approach to God than they once did, probably don't mind saying the latter so much any more, if they even use *that* expression. (I don't speak French, so the previous sentance is just a wild guess-- but a pretty reasonable one.)
"Purpose" is a human invention. If you want one, invent one, but be aware that it's your own creation and not a property of the universe. There's no "coefficient of meaning" in any theory of physics.
Physics is a partial description of the universe -- it is not a definition. Simply because physics does not describe something does not preclude its being a property of the universe.:-)
Many modern video games cost a great deal to make; if an AO game is "edited" to M, the chances of making that back (with profit) are much, much higher than if you try to sell the video game without the big brick-and-mortar retailers.
And there is already a nice standard there: a vanilla kernel from kernal.org
Which version? I think the comment about standards is related to the fact that there is no guaranteed stability in Linux's device driver interface, and this causes problems for binary drivers.
There are of course, arguments why this is a good thing and a bad thing.
"That means that if anyone is to point to someone and say "that person should be killed" and later he dies, the person who did the pointing is guilty of murder."
I'm not a lawyer, but I thought that U.S. law made a distinction between saying, "That person should be killed," and, "Kill that person."
"If, again, the argument is 'ease,' thanks to a technological change or technology itself, then why do slashdotters always argue in favor of technology elsewhere, but against it here?"
Technology is great because, among other things, it tends to be used to make lots of stuff easier, cheaper, or more powerful. If it involves the federal government and personal data, I would rather most anything be difficult, expensive and weak.
"1:) MS could pull out of europe , but if they did EU companys who decide to use MS products would have support from the now independent MSEU and would be paying them for the software"
I really wonder if the E.U. would find it worth the diplomatic row this would create with the U.S.
In ANSI C, the compiler is guaranteed to figure out what a zero means when used as a pointer, even if the system's value for a null pointer is different.
There's a difference between prefering money over some minor etchics issues - and being a monopoly thru illegal bundling and all this stuff we know about. Google just can't be this evil.
Are there such things as minor ethics issues? Even if there are, how do we tell what is minor? To most Slashdotters, as to most people, the standard would be understood -- only in practice, mind you, not in theory -- to be "anything that doesn't hurt me."
Slashdot Mirror
Presumably, this is a joke, but what they hey.
Gandalf (TTT): "Three hundred lives of men I have walked this earth and now I have no time. "
Right, but the fuel must be created somehow-- like electrolysis. What I'm saying is that-- as far as I know-- you can't simply generate it from the energy recovered from braking. (Well, presumably you can, but you wouldn't want to.) This is a good reason to have a battery.
http://www.mozillazine.org/talkback.html?article=6 567
Okay, I know next to nothing about fuel cells, but charging them involves electrolysis or some other non-trivial process, yes? So you need a battery if you're going to take advantage of the energy to be gained back from stopping and such.
You misspelled "support less gun control."
By what weird kind of logic does ripping a CD I own to my computer so that I can put the songs in a playlist, for example, have to do with "theft?" I have bought the music, and freedb was very convenient for me.
I know we're veering off topic here, so I'll stick to a link: Genesis 3.
I can't speak as to whether this is correct or not, but that doesn't look like new ground. It sounds like feudalism to me.
And people under 30 still patronized this theater? I'm surprised.
I read that it was kind of old-fashioned; it's a way of avoiding "sacre Dieu" or "holy God."
The French, having a rather different approach to God than they once did, probably don't mind saying the latter so much any more, if they even use *that* expression. (I don't speak French, so the previous sentance is just a wild guess-- but a pretty reasonable one.)
Physics is a partial description of the universe -- it is not a definition. Simply because physics does not describe something does not preclude its being a property of the universe. :-)
I disagree strongly with the grandparent, but he did clearly say "law != ethics."
Many modern video games cost a great deal to make; if an AO game is "edited" to M, the chances of making that back (with profit) are much, much higher than if you try to sell the video game without the big brick-and-mortar retailers.
As people have said before, Shockwave Flash != Shockwave, though this is really Flash and not Shockwave.
I think Palms by default use RAM for that sort of thing.
Most users != Slashdotters
Which version? I think the comment about standards is related to the fact that there is no guaranteed stability in Linux's device driver interface, and this causes problems for binary drivers.
There are of course, arguments why this is a good thing and a bad thing.
I'm not a lawyer, but I thought that U.S. law made a distinction between saying, "That person should be killed," and, "Kill that person."
Of course, I have no idea about Australia.
Or Julius Ceasar, right?
I hope you mean the reverse. Otherwise you ought to patent time travel, yesterday.
Technology is great because, among other things, it tends to be used to make lots of stuff easier, cheaper, or more powerful. If it involves the federal government and personal data, I would rather most anything be difficult, expensive and weak.
I really wonder if the E.U. would find it worth the diplomatic row this would create with the U.S.
A joke.
In ANSI C, the compiler is guaranteed to figure out what a zero means when used as a pointer, even if the system's value for a null pointer is different.
Are there such things as minor ethics issues? Even if there are, how do we tell what is minor? To most Slashdotters, as to most people, the standard would be understood -- only in practice, mind you, not in theory -- to be "anything that doesn't hurt me."