Until the BSD guys pick up on doing a project like this, I won't care.
The only major difference between BSD and GPL licenses is that BSD allows open software to be closed, so really you're arguing in favour of closed software. Whatever are you doing on Slashdot?
Implying one have to be a GPL fanatic to see any value of/.? That's of course bullshit bordering on trolling.
But you are also wrong about the BSD licence, it doesn't allow open software to be closed - it allows open software to be _forked_. That property it shares with the GPL where the copyright owners can fork their code to be licensed however they want. So the difference is who can fork the code, all (BSD) or the copyright owners (GPL). So which is more free?
But the illogic of your position runs deeper still. The whole point of TFA and of Gneural is to provide an open neural net because closed ones are already plentiful, so the only perceived "benefit" of BSD (using the term loosely) is precisely what Gneural is trying to balance. This makes your desire for BSD licensing so that even more proprietary software can be made totally miss the point of the project.
And you plainly doesn't understand the BSD licence thus missing the point of the post.
I think the senility is beginning to set in for you. One decade ago: 2006, lots of cellphones then. 1996? Still a lot of cellphones. 1986? A lot less but still existing.
Think of the equivalent of someone not liking you playing music at home and then cutting your power. Still seem reasonable? Both are denial of service attacks.
I think your brain leaked out your ear, assuming you ever had one. You are the reason assholes like this exist - self entitled idiots that doesn't accept civilization. Why don't you and your ilk move out far from other people so that nobody can use a cellphone to disturb your selfish ass? No, that wouldn't do - YOU want to have the comfort of civilization when it fits YOU, all others be damned!
And how you think not liking active jamming of devices for civilian use is leading anything into a police state? Ludicrous, grow the fuck up.
Bullshit! In the 80s the Echelon network was exposed and until the recent leaks (when the codenames was exposed to the public) Echelon was used in public discussion of the intelligence gathering of the US "spy ring" (includes UK, Australia etc.).
- Sends your data to a large host of Microsoft addresses without your permission.
Really? My logs doesn't show that.
- Ignores your attempts to disable this activity.
Nope. Unless MS works together with misc. sites like/. to send steganographic covert information. You know it's possible to verify right?
- Installs and displays ads to you in a manner similar to PUP adware
Really? How come I don't see any ads then?
- Changes your settings to actively promote their money making ventures.
What?!?
- Lies and hides changes in the attempt to mislead the user into thinking they are secure.
On one hand Win 10 might might help prevent an infection from a third party actor. On the other hand you guarantee that Microsoft has unfettered access to your computer, its usage, and all of the data it contains.
In that case I will stick to the might get infected and mitigate the risk with antivirus. It is safer.
Summary has a few hundred people with a moderate radiation dose and even the single highest dose is well survivable.
Compare with Chernobyl. How many dead within minutes? How many dead within weeks?
Within minutes? None unless someone were in an area where the steam explosion reached (but then it wouldn't be the radiation that killed them). Within weeks? Those close to the site like the operators of the failed reactor.
To be killed within minutes after radiation exposure requires extreme doses many times the lethal dose.
It is likely that in order to reduce exposure per person employees from other plants were temporary moved to the disaster site. Looking at the company page on the Wikipedia seem to point to that too, the total number of employees is listed as 38671 and they have a total of 190 power plants of misc. types.
Death and suffering caused by nuclear power is dwarfed by that of conventional power plants and most renewable power. Extra cancer deaths from the Chernobyl disaster? Sure if you include the firefighters and military that was trying to contain the graphite fire, most of the early deaths was caused by radiation damage rather than cancer but the effects of intense ionizing radiation in the long term is known to increase chances of cancer. The population of Pripyat who would breath particles of radioactive graphite is also expected to have a higher chance of lung cancer (+stomach cancer etc. due to swallowing the radioactive particles).
Northern Sweden received much of the fallout from the disaster due to the weather (intense rain + wind patterns) and the increased radioactivity from mainly cesium is still monitored. The population in those parts also was more exposed to the dangers as many eat wild meat, berries and mushrooms picked in the wild. Still there are _no_ indication that the fallout caused any additional cancer case!
You didn't list one of the real problems with nuclear power: uranium mining which in common with many types of mining causes spreading of heavy metals, poisons used for extraction and highly hazardous waste products (sludge) that is difficult to contain.
Your post doesn't make sense! Observe that we aren't talking about a bug or backdoor in a MS product, just that software that uses the public API to do something. So do you really blame MS when someone downloads something that can run on a Windows machine and it happens to be malware?
If so I hope you blame Linus whenever someone installs some malware on their Linux machine...
And I like someone that thinks economics is something one can be great at. The majority of economic theory isn't connected to reality and that doesn't change whether their cheerleaders are left wing or right wing (or something in between).
And for you to do yours. Hint: the world isn't black and white. There are grays too. If you view any issue either positively or negatively you don't understand it at all. An utopia isn't reality as anybody with a sense and ability to see, hear, read what people think and do.
Many people are helped to move from a piss-poor environment to a better one. Not becoming rich (which seems to be what you think is important given the emphasis on wealth distribution?) but being able to eat better, study better and work better. Is that worth nothing? Is that hindering them from improving further to the riches you think are essential? Nope. But the real reasons poor people stay poor are complex socially and politically - this space is limited.
Some people have zero ambition and welfare will not help them, in some cases it can even stop them making the effort otherwise necessary to improve their lives. Those are those that stay poor and will always stay poor. Welfare have nothing to do with it, ambition is the key. Reduce/remove welfare and they will move out into the streets begging for their next meal instead.
Since when did a country protecting its borders and putting the interests of its own citizens ahead of the interests of foreigners become some buzzword for "evil racism" that every self-righteous liberal now feels the need to decry?
So one is self-centered when pointing out that other people is painted out as the problem in obviously racist language? Good double-think there.
Every country in history has protected its borders and controlled immigration to some extent. Only in this weird modern era is that somehow viewed as a BAD thing.
Strawman. We aren't talking about "some extent" of border protection here. Well the rest of the world isn't, you may be.
And yes, when the U.S. was being settled, we were much more open to immigrants coming in. But that was back when we had tons of unsettled land available and plenty of jobs to spare, when infrastructure wasn't much needed, when there was no "social safety-net" to speak of, and when anyone who could handle a plow and work hard could make a go of it as a farmer.
The US have enough space for doubling or quadrupling the population without problem. Thinking otherwise is delusional. The problem is one of distributing the population to avoid hard resource bottlenecks in large cities. That problem would still be a problem with no immigration BTW.
Slashdot Mirror
The only major difference between BSD and GPL licenses is that BSD allows open software to be closed, so really you're arguing in favour of closed software. Whatever are you doing on Slashdot?
Implying one have to be a GPL fanatic to see any value of /.? That's of course bullshit bordering on trolling.
But you are also wrong about the BSD licence, it doesn't allow open software to be closed - it allows open software to be _forked_. That property it shares with the GPL where the copyright owners can fork their code to be licensed however they want. So the difference is who can fork the code, all (BSD) or the copyright owners (GPL). So which is more free?
But the illogic of your position runs deeper still. The whole point of TFA and of Gneural is to provide an open neural net because closed ones are already plentiful , so the only perceived "benefit" of BSD (using the term loosely) is precisely what Gneural is trying to balance. This makes your desire for BSD licensing so that even more proprietary software can be made totally miss the point of the project.
And you plainly doesn't understand the BSD licence thus missing the point of the post.
Rollback to the previous version unless something very strange is going on.
X86 isn't a stack-based architecture, those architectures are called stack machines which - again - the x86 isn't an example of.
Very few computers doesn't have stack support either in hardware or as a software convention as it helps make things like re-entrant calls possible.
Intel killed Expresscard?!? It's Intel, not intel BTW.
You don't like phones? Cram a jammer up your ass!
I think the senility is beginning to set in for you. One decade ago: 2006, lots of cellphones then. 1996? Still a lot of cellphones. 1986? A lot less but still existing.
Think of the equivalent of someone not liking you playing music at home and then cutting your power. Still seem reasonable? Both are denial of service attacks.
I think your brain leaked out your ear, assuming you ever had one. You are the reason assholes like this exist - self entitled idiots that doesn't accept civilization. Why don't you and your ilk move out far from other people so that nobody can use a cellphone to disturb your selfish ass? No, that wouldn't do - YOU want to have the comfort of civilization when it fits YOU, all others be damned!
And how you think not liking active jamming of devices for civilian use is leading anything into a police state? Ludicrous, grow the fuck up.
But this is an egotistic asshole that likes to feel in control so that isn't an alternative.
As alcohol content is what defines a good beer...
I have never been in a plane crash, train crash or car crash. Does that mean those doesn't happen? Nope.
Bullshit! In the 80s the Echelon network was exposed and until the recent leaks (when the codenames was exposed to the public) Echelon was used in public discussion of the intelligence gathering of the US "spy ring" (includes UK, Australia etc.).
Quantum computing doesn't work like that. Pet peeve - sorry for the interruption.
Specific security implications in Windows 10:
- Sends your data to a large host of Microsoft addresses without your permission.
Really? My logs doesn't show that.
- Ignores your attempts to disable this activity.
Nope. Unless MS works together with misc. sites like /. to send steganographic covert information. You know it's possible to verify right?
- Installs and displays ads to you in a manner similar to PUP adware
Really? How come I don't see any ads then?
- Changes your settings to actively promote their money making ventures.
What?!?
- Lies and hides changes in the attempt to mislead the user into thinking they are secure.
On one hand Win 10 might might help prevent an infection from a third party actor. On the other hand you guarantee that Microsoft has unfettered access to your computer, its usage, and all of the data it contains.
In that case I will stick to the might get infected and mitigate the risk with antivirus. It is safer.
You are just another conspiracy theorist.
Are you that clueless that you think exposing sensitive data to the world is speaking out?
I think that Snowden in general did the right thing but realize that what he did is equivalent to espionage.
That's why you use smurfs.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
The US != the western world.
Summary has a few hundred people with a moderate radiation dose and even the single highest dose is well survivable.
Compare with Chernobyl. How many dead within minutes? How many dead within weeks?
Within minutes? None unless someone were in an area where the steam explosion reached (but then it wouldn't be the radiation that killed them). Within weeks? Those close to the site like the operators of the failed reactor.
To be killed within minutes after radiation exposure requires extreme doses many times the lethal dose.
Hint: In Sweden the military also have to follow laws, so you are wrong.
It is likely that in order to reduce exposure per person employees from other plants were temporary moved to the disaster site. Looking at the company page on the Wikipedia seem to point to that too, the total number of employees is listed as 38671 and they have a total of 190 power plants of misc. types.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Still better than thinking that should be a bit more!
Death and suffering caused by nuclear power is dwarfed by that of conventional power plants and most renewable power. Extra cancer deaths from the Chernobyl disaster? Sure if you include the firefighters and military that was trying to contain the graphite fire, most of the early deaths was caused by radiation damage rather than cancer but the effects of intense ionizing radiation in the long term is known to increase chances of cancer. The population of Pripyat who would breath particles of radioactive graphite is also expected to have a higher chance of lung cancer (+stomach cancer etc. due to swallowing the radioactive particles).
Northern Sweden received much of the fallout from the disaster due to the weather (intense rain + wind patterns) and the increased radioactivity from mainly cesium is still monitored. The population in those parts also was more exposed to the dangers as many eat wild meat, berries and mushrooms picked in the wild. Still there are _no_ indication that the fallout caused any additional cancer case!
You didn't list one of the real problems with nuclear power: uranium mining which in common with many types of mining causes spreading of heavy metals, poisons used for extraction and highly hazardous waste products (sludge) that is difficult to contain.
Your post doesn't make sense! Observe that we aren't talking about a bug or backdoor in a MS product, just that software that uses the public API to do something. So do you really blame MS when someone downloads something that can run on a Windows machine and it happens to be malware?
If so I hope you blame Linus whenever someone installs some malware on their Linux machine...
And I like someone that thinks economics is something one can be great at. The majority of economic theory isn't connected to reality and that doesn't change whether their cheerleaders are left wing or right wing (or something in between).
And for you to do yours. Hint: the world isn't black and white. There are grays too. If you view any issue either positively or negatively you don't understand it at all. An utopia isn't reality as anybody with a sense and ability to see, hear, read what people think and do.
Many people are helped to move from a piss-poor environment to a better one. Not becoming rich (which seems to be what you think is important given the emphasis on wealth distribution?) but being able to eat better, study better and work better. Is that worth nothing? Is that hindering them from improving further to the riches you think are essential? Nope. But the real reasons poor people stay poor are complex socially and politically - this space is limited.
Some people have zero ambition and welfare will not help them, in some cases it can even stop them making the effort otherwise necessary to improve their lives. Those are those that stay poor and will always stay poor. Welfare have nothing to do with it, ambition is the key. Reduce/remove welfare and they will move out into the streets begging for their next meal instead.
Since when did a country protecting its borders and putting the interests of its own citizens ahead of the interests of foreigners become some buzzword for "evil racism" that every self-righteous liberal now feels the need to decry?
So one is self-centered when pointing out that other people is painted out as the problem in obviously racist language? Good double-think there.
Every country in history has protected its borders and controlled immigration to some extent. Only in this weird modern era is that somehow viewed as a BAD thing.
Strawman. We aren't talking about "some extent" of border protection here. Well the rest of the world isn't, you may be.
And yes, when the U.S. was being settled, we were much more open to immigrants coming in. But that was back when we had tons of unsettled land available and plenty of jobs to spare, when infrastructure wasn't much needed, when there was no "social safety-net" to speak of, and when anyone who could handle a plow and work hard could make a go of it as a farmer.
The US have enough space for doubling or quadrupling the population without problem. Thinking otherwise is delusional. The problem is one of distributing the population to avoid hard resource bottlenecks in large cities. That problem would still be a problem with no immigration BTW.