Slashdot Mirror


User: 3am

3am's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
502
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 502

  1. Re:Another reason to vote correctly. on FBI Wants to Tap The Net · · Score: 1

    no thanks, i think the libertarian position is logically inconsistent, like marxism.

    it has some worthwhile positions, and i would never say that it is pro-corruption.

    however, I think it's hopelessly naive to think that you can manage a large country with a small investment in central government. i also don't believe in the religious conviction that many libertarians place in the power of free-market capitolism.

    anyway, best of luck in continuing elections, even without my vote.

  2. Re:Another reason to vote correctly. on FBI Wants to Tap The Net · · Score: 1

    just a thought, but could it possibly be the lack of representation of the libertarian party in government is simply due to the democratic process?

    i think the reason you don't see libertarians in office is that the ideology is unattractive to people. nobody likes the party. especially when it tries to exploit a disaster for political gains...

  3. Re:Welcome to 1984... on FBI Wants to Tap The Net · · Score: 1

    overused and not completely analogous.

  4. everyone act surprised now... on FBI Wants to Tap The Net · · Score: 1

    come on, this is exactly what has been done with every mode of communication throughout history.

    we all knew it was coming, and frankly, i thought it was quietly humming along already.

  5. Re:Great article - graph is not misleading on Microsoft's Future · · Score: 1

    okay, i agree with you mostly, but you are wrong on the the last point.

    while it seems like the plot is misleading, it is growth rate, and the change in it that account for most of the valuation of a stock. and as we all know, microsoft is much more concerned about 'MSFT' (their ticker symbol, for the financially disinclined) than about software...

    for some extracurricular reading, try:
    http://stocksense.com/valuation.html
    http://www.isp-planet.com/research/notes_on_pric in g.html

    the second is briefer, the first more detailed. i am not a broker and there are many different pricing models for different types of businesses, but it's fair to say that the graphs was not misleading.

  6. Re:more accurate... on Physics and Archaeology · · Score: 1

    god is a three letter word that represents a fantasy created by an advanced hominid culture that arose about 5 billion years after the 3rd planet from the sun coalesced from matter in this star's planetary disk.

    this is often a confusion of people, too.

  7. Re:more accurate... on Physics and Archaeology · · Score: 1

    or, if you are completely objective, god does not exist at all.

    your may not be as objective as you want to believe...

  8. Re:Theistic evolution... on Physics and Archaeology · · Score: 1

    a decent if unsatisfying answer to that is the anthropic principle (weak/strong varieties) which is that, yes, the universe could have evolved in many ways, but it evolved in the one we see today, and our existence is proof of that.

  9. Re:more accurate... on Physics and Archaeology · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    why are you on slashdot?

    go handle rattlesnakes and speak in tongues you medieval throwback...

    try to wrap your mind around that.

  10. Re:That really does depend... on Quirky Engineers Gone the Way of the Dinosaur? · · Score: 1

    and if someone made you talk to useless MBAs all day long instead of coding, you'd prefer that...?

    if my manager goes to meetings with clients, other officers in other departments of the company, then s\he has my thanks.

    it lets me be more productive while doing something i like.

    (yes i know it's humor, just showing the other side of the coin)

  11. Of course they wouldn't have, but... on Ellison's ID Card Plan Gets More Attention · · Score: 1

    In 5 years, they might prevent a repeat. Ask me how, I'm not sure.... Perhaps they will require them for courses on how to get a hazmat trucking license, pilot courses, purchasing massive quantities of fertilizer, purchasing biohazards, etc... And even this might not stop another attack, but it might make it a hell of a lot easier to trace the terrorists and their supporters.

  12. Re:Brought to you by the fine folks at Oracle on Ellison's ID Card Plan Gets More Attention · · Score: 1

    Who exactly would you prefer then?

    This is a huge project, and it's fair to say that only Microsoft, IBM, EMC, Oracle, or some combination of that group could pull it off.

    Frankly, Oracle's no worse than any of those other companies. If you want to argue that this database/ID card should never exist, that's fine. I might agree. But that Oracle is a poor choice, that's not fair. I trust their product more than SQLServer...

  13. Re:History is bunk on Babbage, A Look Back · · Score: 1

    i disagree with you.

    knowing the history and theory behind a technology make your knowledge of that technology more broad and complete, which will always help your career.

    having a sound background in mathematical logic or EE are very similar to knowing computer history in that respect. you can be a very competent programmer without them, but you will have a broader and deeper insight into your code if you are knowledgable in those areas.

    the evolution of c++ and oop, the rise of desktop computers, unix/linux connection, and internet/DARPANET... i think these offer important lessons that while not being so immediately advantageous, will help you out career-wise in the long run.

  14. Re:I plead ignorance on Babbage, A Look Back · · Score: 1

    just a thought, but it sounds like you've never invented/discovered anything worth mentioning...

  15. Re:*LOL* on Babbage, A Look Back · · Score: 1

    agree or disagree with you, you're a real dickhead.

    kurt vonnegut, in cat's cradle, talks about 'granfallooners'. they are meaningless association among people (ie 'hey, we both have black hair!')

    to think that short-sightedness and insularity are any more american than they are 'non-american' is just amusingly ignorant.

    in making such a broad and silly generalization, you're just as guilty as the people you mock of small-mindedness.

  16. Re:History is bunk on Babbage, A Look Back · · Score: 1

    look, i'm sure you'll do fine for the most part without knowledge of computer history.

    you'll just be a little more ignorant, but that's by your own choice.

  17. Re:Am I the only one? on Babbage, A Look Back · · Score: 1

    doesn't the wave structure break down in to random motion of the air molecules (ie, heat)? does anyone know what the thermal threshold of sound is?

  18. Re:What About "Journals of Record"? on Cutting Out the Middle Men in Scientific Publishing · · Score: 1

    really, i feel that most people object to losing the copyright to their work. i can't see any decent arguments as to why this should be the case, but i'm certainly open to illumination by someone who does know.

  19. Re:Ferrari is the only company. . . on Apple Still Says No To Aqua-Like Themes · · Score: 3, Informative

    google >> http://www.oppenheimer.com/intprop/trademark/faq/f aq.shtml

    A trademark or, more generally, a "mark," is anything that identifies and distinguishes a product and/or service. Marks used in connection with services are often called "service marks." A mark can consist of words, phrases, numbers or designs. In some cases, product configurations, consistent themes of products, the appearance of labels or packaging, animated sequences, colors, sounds or even smells can function as marks. The appearance of product packaging or the configuration of the product itself is called the "trade dress."

    look, just because you don't like it doesn't mean that it's not reality. companies can and do copyright colors.

    IANAL

  20. parent post is better than modded... on Apple Cancels Apple Expo 2001 · · Score: 1

    not a 5, but worth reading. and 'offtopic' just barely applies... think before you mod down...

  21. Re:Osama Bin Laden - Not Guilty on A New Kind of War · · Score: 1

    3 translations of the qur'an

    interesting parts: 060.008, 060.009, 047.004, use the search to find others if you'd like.

    there is text to support what bin laden is doing, but there is text that condemns it too. guess Islam is closer to Christianity than i though... in any case i though your comment was pretty insightful.

  22. Re:Alternative Courses of Action on A New Kind of War · · Score: 1

    you are a moron.

    seriously, you are so misguided as to be close to beyond pity. first off, you think that any muslim would believe that someone wrapped in a pig carcass would go straight to hell... find me a passage in the qu'ran that supports this. i dare you.

    the only thing this would do is to offend any person in the muslim world. imagine the reverse scenario: bunch of american christian fundamentalists get together, bomb tehran killing thousands. iranian government apprehends them, executes them, and forces their corpses into homosexual positions. are these people going to hell according to jerry falwell or pat robertson? of course not - they are seen as f*ing christian martyrs, and the iranian government is seen as a bunch of savages.

  23. Re:Clinton a victim? on More WTC News · · Score: 1

    he's in harlem, anyway. he'd be further from the WTC than people in Hoboken.

  24. Re:speculation on More News And Links On Yesterday's Terrorist Attack · · Score: 1

    or we could let all the 'palestinians' (that made up nationality) immigrate to egypt, iran, iraq, lebanon, syria, ...

    but, no, that would make sense for some reason. maybe, just maybe, you're the racist here.

    any hopes for a rational decision and end to the confict just ended, and it's the fault of the arab side. deal with it.

  25. Re:How to safely prevent this from happening again on More News And Links On Yesterday's Terrorist Attack · · Score: 1

    how come a nation called 'palestine' never existed either? britain gave it that name after they took it over from the turks during WWI...

    israel will exist forever, they're fighters, and as hard as nails. and to boot, if you haven't forgotten, ehud barak offered them more than they were asking for (including joint control of jerusalem), and they rejected it. they (read: hamas, hezbollah, et al) are hateful, they want israel destroyed. a sovereign 'palestine' is secondary to the goal of killing every jew in the middle east.