Slashdot Mirror


Apple Cancels Apple Expo 2001

Ziploc writes: "Apple today announced the cancellation of Apple Expo 2001, which was scheduled to take place at Paris Expo, Porte de Versailles, from September 26th to 30th, 2001. See the press release here."

237 comments

  1. Steve Jobs keeps his promise by Lemur+catta · · Score: 3, Funny

    Steve Jobs promised "No new hardware at Expo Paris."
    Looks like he'll be keeping his promise!

    1. Re:Steve Jobs keeps his promise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yes, but the big question I have about Steve Jobs is "Does he run Linux?"

    2. Re:Steve Jobs keeps his promise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine a beowolf cluster running on hundreds of Steve Jobs!

    3. Re:Steve Jobs keeps his promise by Genoaschild · · Score: 0

      Steve Jobs will never run Linux or officially support it. It makes sense. Apple is a hardware company. They make most of their money on the hardware and not the software that comes with their product. So it is safe that if Apple went completely Linux, they would go out of business. Apple Hardware is generally expensive and has a lagging factor behind x86 chips. So if all Apple hardware runs Linux, it would be cheaper to buy an x86 Linux box then one that runs on PPC and you can get cheaper hardware that runs somewhat faster then that of the PPC(although you do pay for it in driver compatibility.) Because of this, they will never go completely Linux.

      The question is, why don't they support Linux at all. If they supported Linux with their hardware but not as the primary OS they will sell more MACS. If people are in the macintosh market and they think they might want to run Linux later, they'll think twice before buying a new Mac. If it will support Linux, it might give some encouragement into buying the computer. I really don't care personally if Jobs run Linux or not but he should understand the thoughts of the consumer on whether they should be able to run Linux.

      --
      Just because a bunch of people believe or do something stupid, doesn't make it any less stupid.
    4. Re:Steve Jobs keeps his promise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux is gay. Why would I want to spend 5 hours doing things I could do in 5 minutes on Windows XP.

    5. Re:Steve Jobs keeps his promise by piecewise · · Score: 2

      Of course that's really NOT funny, considering the subject matter.

      Eh, I should lighten up.. You're right, this is all really funny. Ha ha. I'm chuckling, really.

      --
      The next comment I write will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
    6. Re:Steve Jobs keeps his promise by AxsDeny · · Score: 1

      Of course the Mac hardware runs linux. THere are multiple versions of linux for PPC architecture. What hole have you been living in? Ohhh... 1987...

      Wake up. LinuxPPC, YellowDog, MkLinux, etc...

      --

      zork% mv *.asp /bin/darkroom
      283 files eaten by a grue
    7. Re:Steve Jobs keeps his promise by Genoaschild · · Score: 0

      I said support Linux, not run Linux. Steve Jobs will never support Linux. "Steve Jobs will never run Linux" means he will never support it not that the Mac can't run Linux. Learn the difference.

      --
      Just because a bunch of people believe or do something stupid, doesn't make it any less stupid.
  2. Jobs toys not yet ready? by Coryoth · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    So what's the bet that it's simply because they didn't manage to get the latest layer of candy coated plastic onto Jobs' latest little weird idea?

    Jedidiah

    1. Re:Jobs toys not yet ready? by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2

      I'd bet that it was because there would be logistics problems right now with the backlog of flights steming from last weeks events.

    2. Re:Jobs toys not yet ready? by Joseppi+Blauinski · · Score: 1

      people with email domain of hotmail shouldn't throw rocks

  3. They should hold it at my iglo... by Igloo+Boy · · Score: 0

    It's totally impervious to any kind of terrorist attack. I'd even go so far as to say that it may be impervious to any kind of nuclear weapon. Only one draw back. It's cold year round. I keep warm by reading pr0n.

    1. Re:They should hold it at my iglo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yYOoU RrEAaD YyOuUR prR0nN?

  4. I don't understand the relevance. by Telek · · Score: 1, Troll

    Serious question here. I'm sorry, but what does this have anything to do with the Paris Expo? Security is their #1 concern? I'm not following the relevance.

    --

    If God gave us curiosity
    1. Re:I don't understand the relevance. by steveo777 · · Score: 1

      A lot of people would have to fly from the US to France in order to get to the expo. Many are still in fear that another plane could be hijacked.

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
    2. Re:I don't understand the relevance. by ce25254 · · Score: 1

      And many are having trouble getting through security to the airplanes.

    3. Re:I don't understand the relevance. by _Spirit · · Score: 1

      Arrests have been made in Europe connected to the tragedy last week. The people arrested were planning new attacks, this time against targets in Europe, presumably to respond to forthcoming U.S. retalliation.

      --

      beauty is only a light switch away

    4. Re:I don't understand the relevance. by MaxVlast · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that it's illegal to export Power Mac G4s to certain countries.

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    5. Re:I don't understand the relevance. by BinxBolling · · Score: 1
      Serious question here. I'm sorry, but what does this have anything to do with the Paris Expo? Security is their #1 concern? I'm not following the relevance.

      Even if nobody was worried about attacks, there's a more basic practical matter: How will people get there? The airlines have a pretty big backlog of cancelled flights to deal with, and many people will probably be simply unable to make it.

    6. Re:I don't understand the relevance. by Henriok · · Score: 1

      If the US goes to war in a week flying across the Atlantic with 100's of employees and tons of cargo isn't a great idea. The risk of getting stuck in Europe, or half of the staff on Iceland and the rest i Amsterdam isn't that good. I dontät think Apples is really afraid of being a target, but they are concerned for their emploees.

      --

      - Henrik

      - when the Shadows descend -
  5. When do they announce the new line? by Inthewire · · Score: 1

    So the new hardware isn't going to get a pretty parade in Paris?

    --


    Writers imply. Readers infer.
    1. Re:When do they announce the new line? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no new hardware. This horrible tragedy is being used as an excuse by Jobs so that he doesn't have to do a demo on an obsolete machine.

    2. Re:When do they announce the new line? by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      So the new hardware isn't going to get a pretty parade in Paris?

      It wasn't going to. The only new hardware is a revised PowerBook G4, anyway. The real big thing is Mac OS 10.1, which will still be released on schedule.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  6. Re:ESR on the WTC Attack by szcx · · Score: 0, Troll

    Of course it's offtopic, God forbid Slashdot editorial abuse is exposed.

  7. Apple can't afford to lose any more users... by viking099 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    After all, they don't have many left as it is...

    1. Re:Apple can't afford to lose any more users... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not too many bsd users left either.

    2. Re:Apple can't afford to lose any more users... by Spruitje · · Score: 5, Interesting


      After all, they don't have many left as it is...


      Strange, they are the only computercompany which didn't made a loss last quarter.
      And the iBook and G4 ti is selling like crazy..
      Typical anti Apple FUD as always.

    3. Re:Apple can't afford to lose any more users... by Chainsaw · · Score: 1

      Too bad for you, they will gain one very soon. I'm fed up with PC:s giving me incredibly amounts of trouble (Windows) or being plain user hostile (Linux). My old computer will have to act as a server in the future, where Linux actually fits very well. The computer I will sit in front of and work on will run MacOS X all the time.

      --
      War is one of the most horrible things a human can be exposed to. And one of the worlds largest industries.
    4. Re:Apple can't afford to lose any more users... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've used macs at school when they actually had them, and they were less stable than my Windblows computer at home.

    5. Re:Apple can't afford to lose any more users... by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 1

      Linux user hostile? Nah, it is more like "honey, what's wrong? == What's wrong with the computer?"

      The answer is to both questions "If you don't know I'm not going to tell you."

      Solution? a lot of coaxing, key/ego stroking and looking in the right places and eventually you'll figure it/them/her out.

      Moose.

      There are two ways to argue with a woman, neither one works.

      --
      Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
    6. Re:Apple can't afford to lose any more users... by Genoaschild · · Score: 0

      Monopolies are more immune to recession then other companies. People still want their product and most are still willing to pay the ridiculous prices in order to get what they want. They will sell fewer but more then non-monopolies(it is just as easy to go to another company to get the price you want.)

      PS: I know this is going to be modded down but it still won't stop me.

      --
      Just because a bunch of people believe or do something stupid, doesn't make it any less stupid.
    7. Re:Apple can't afford to lose any more users... by mkelley · · Score: 1

      They have the same market share percentage that Linux has. Would you rather have a solid 5% or a weak 50% of users?

      --

      m.kelley
      life is like a freeway, if you don't look you could miss it.
    8. Re:Apple can't afford to lose any more users... by Phroggy · · Score: 2

      After all, they don't have many left as it is...

      That's right, and they certainly can't afford to give away ONE MILLION DOLLARS and a truckload of laptop computers.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    9. Re:Apple can't afford to lose any more users... by dhamsaic · · Score: 1

      check out mac os x. i've had on my new ibook since early june and i've rebooted it twice since then. it's exceptionally stable, and kicks the fuck out the windows 2000 workstation i'm writing this on... doesn't touch my linux though (320+ days and counting)...

      --
      Every once in a while I like to masturbate a new word into my vocabulary, even if I don't know what it means.
  8. Figured he'd do that... by Dysan2k · · Score: 1

    It doesn't take me by surprise at all, and I don't really blame him. International flights out of the US are going to be a little scary for a while since the past Tuesdays affairs.

    Since there was no new hardware to be displayed, I don't really see this as much of a loss anyhow.

    Apple really needs to refocus and release tech. info on their older systems anyhow. I've been fighting for 2 years to get driver-level specs for a Powerbook 1400, and have yet to recieve anything but a runaround. MacOS X based on a BSD core is pretty cool, but Apple just like IBM-clones need a choice. BeOS comes close, but neither of these will run on my PB. I'd hate to think I'd wasted my money.

    BTW, a 1400 CAN be installed, but PCMCIA and floppy support, you can forget about.

    --
    -What have you contributed lately?
    1. Re:Figured he'd do that... by Spruitje · · Score: 3, Interesting


      Apple really needs to refocus and release tech. info on their older systems anyhow. I've been fighting for 2 years to get driver-level specs for a Powerbook 1400, and have yet to recieve anything but a runaround. MacOS X based on a BSD core is pretty cool, but Apple just like IBM-clones need a choice. BeOS comes close, but neither of these will run on my PB. I'd hate to think I'd wasted my money.


      Like Compaq, Toshiba, Dell and some other company's.
      I have a five year old Pentium 90 laptop with 8 mb and Windows XP won't install on it.
      Yeesh, get a live.
      The powerbook 1400 is almost 5 years old.
      And it isn't a PCI machine.

    2. Re:Figured he'd do that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's simply asking for driver-level information about this powerbook so that he can use the PCMCIA and floppy on his laptop with a third-party OS (BEOS.) What's wrong with that?

      More power to him if he's satisfied with his 1400. I wish I could be happy with my current system for 5 years.

    3. Re:Figured he'd do that... by Teun · · Score: 1
      It doesn't take me by surprise at all, and I don't really blame him. International flights out of the US are going to be a little scary for a while since the past Tuesdays affairs.

      You're a god damn yellow belly, there has never been strickter security around air travel and you chicken out!

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    4. Re:Figured he'd do that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      ...fighting for 2 years to get driver-level specs...

      Huh??? There are links to spec books for PowerBook 1400 and 1400 Enhanced on Apple's Hardware Developer Documentation page.

      These docs include a lot more info than I've ever gotten out of Dell. Want details about that Mac Portable collector's item? It's available from that page.

    5. Re:Figured he'd do that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I have the same feeling.

      Nerd: "I want low level driver specs for my 5-year old laptop."
      1-800-SOS-APPL: "I'm sorry sir, we don't have that kind of information here. Perhaps you should contact developer support. Are you having any particular problems with this laptop that I can help you with?"
      Nerd: "Yes, I am having a problem, I need low level driver specs so I can get BeOS working with this laptop."
      1-800-SOS-APPL: "As I said, sir, we don't have access to that kind of information. Perhaps if you contacted developer support..."
      Nerd: "NO! They won't talk to me without getting money out of me, or at least signing away some of my civil liberties! Give me the specs!"
      (click)

  9. Re:ESR on the WTC Attack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Boneheaded, opportunistic comment of the day. Pot, kettle.

    Sorry, I missed ESR's comments, they were initially drowned out by gun-control fuckwits automatically blaming the attacks on guns.

  10. Mac OS Rumors was wrong! by eAndroid · · Score: 2

    Turns out there actually won't be any new products announced at Apple Expo this year.

    --

    I can't spell or type, but that doesn't mean I'm unusually stupid.
  11. Apple donates $1M and iBooks by LordNimon · · Score: 4, Informative
    From MacCentral: An Apple spokesperson confirmed for MacCentral today the company would donate $1 million dollars to the families of rescue workers that lost their lives in the attacks on two American cities last week.

    Apple will also be donating an iBook to each of these families with children.

    --
    And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
    To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    1. Re:Apple donates $1M and iBooks by jswitte · · Score: 1

      This warms my heart, it really does. (and no, I've never "read" pr0n)

    2. Re:Apple donates $1M and iBooks by INicheI · · Score: 0

      What a good idea. Jobs has a good heart.

    3. Re:Apple donates $1M and iBooks by jaysones · · Score: 1

      Now that's a fantastic thing to do. That could change some lives. Good work, Apple!

  12. Looks like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This will have to wait for a while! :)

  13. I can see the logic by HerrNewton · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The expo starts on the 26th, 15 days after the attacks on the WTC. Apple has to move a lot of key personnel from Apple USA to Paris for the expo, personnel which are not always American citizens and some are quite likely "Arab looking".

    --

    ----
    Am I the only one who thinks Microsoft is a misnomer? Perhaps Macrosoft would be a better fit?
    1. Re:I can see the logic by Spruitje · · Score: 2

      There goes my trip to Paris.

  14. Re:Dumb move... by INicheI · · Score: 0

    Well it is a real shame that this has happened. Everyone is now afaird of terroism, giving the terrorists just what they want. This was a poor move on Apples part. I think that apple will soon find itself in real financial trouble (not neccisarily because of this).

  15. Good move by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 1

    I think it is still a bit too soon for a high energy SteveNote address right now. Good call.

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
  16. Apple = USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple is one of the 10 most visible, most symbolic US companies in history. Putting hundreds of thousands of people into a convention hall in one of the west's biggest and most symbolic cities, which has been the object of sustained but sporadic extremist terrorist attcks for 20 years, and then expecting French authorities to secure the site... is not a good idea right now.

    Plus there are problems with logistics (getting exhibitors to and from the US when the airports are barely functioning)

    1. Re:Apple = USA by WildBeast · · Score: 1

      In short, they're wimps

  17. cudos to Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it looks like this is a good thing. Finally they realize that nothing will stop Lord Gates. Bow to him for he is admin...lord of all geeks....

  18. Re:Dumb move... by Dysan2k · · Score: 1

    Oh.. they've managed to disrupt. There's no doubt about that. And they've finally gotten what they've wanted after all these years: Distruction of a notable amount on US soil.

    So be it, the trick is that we'll rebuild the World Trade Centers and surrounding buildings. We'll have Federal security instead of the lousy $6/hr wannabe's that will let you on a plane with a Bowie knife. It will be a safer than it was before, and not giving up any personal freedoms. But now, we all have a common goal to focus on, and this helps keep at bay the internal problems we've had in the past.

    Maybe after this is all over with, we can have the military ACTUALLY patrolling the borders and keep more drugs/terrorists/etc. out of our country!

    --
    -What have you contributed lately?
  19. Apple Expo 2001 by Migelikor1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    On one hand, I sympathize with security concerns. This is a frightening time. On the other hand, is a congregation of nerds in Paris really much of a target? If the terrorists were going after intellectuals, they could have crashed into harvard or MIT (15 minutes into their flight from boston). If they want to damage the economy, damaging such a narrow (1 company+peripheral manufacturers) target wouldn't be nearly effective as hitting, for instance, the Stock exchange. It's like my school, where janitors were posted to make sure nobody bombed. Seems like a bit of paranoia to me, but on the other hand Apple didn't have much to say.

    --
    My Karma is so good, I'm the Dalai Lama...or something.
  20. Jobs has an excuse now by hoss_33 · · Score: 2

    Apple was not happy with the press ranting about "no new products".
    The show would have been very weak, with another Jobs keynote just about the Mac OS X upgrade.
    Now the terror threat comes in very handy to cancel the fiasco show.

    --
    -- bmp System Support - Vienna, Austria
    1. Re:Jobs has an excuse now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i dunno... traveling is still sketchy.... a friend of mine was scheduled to go from Philly to LA last wednesday.. he's still getting the runaround from the airlines... and i would think international is worse. plus there is always the chance of unexpected airport closings, plus the shipment of all the gear they need for the expo..... and then when you get past that nonsense, you still have to convince yourself and all your employees that it's ok to fly. i would think some people on the west coast are not psyched to hop flights to the east coast (NY?) and then oversees at this point. maybe they don't care, but vomules of passengers on planes are at 40% of normal so obviously people are still uneasy. i think i would fly if i had to be somewhere, but i would never force anyone else to. as for lack of products, i think the euro user base would be happy enough that Apple was showing up. they were lacking in that area for a while. even if they do not unveil something new and sexy it is still a good place to talk to Apple reps and play with top of the line hardware.

    2. Re:Jobs has an excuse now by SlamMan · · Score: 1

      And blind cynicism rears its ugly head...

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
  21. Good Move, but... by smoondog · · Score: 1

    While I agree this was definately the right thing to do, it is a bummer that the events of last week are having longer term disruptions. The best thing, IMO, for the economy and stability is to go back to life as close to normal as possible, except with beefed up security.

    -Sean

  22. Coward. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jobs is a big ass coward. He's too chicken to fly.

    1. Re:Coward. by daviddennis · · Score: 2

      This isn't about him; he has a Gulfstream V he would have used to fly to the expo.

      I predict a lot of large corporations are going to consider following his lead in the very near future.

      D

    2. Re:Coward. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's an article in the Wall Street Journal about it today. You will be shocked at the sheer number of big name companies that are already forbiding employee travel on airplanes indefinately.

    3. Re:Coward. by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      This isn't about him; he has a Gulfstream V he would have used to fly to the expo.

      Is the FAA allowing private flights yet? They were only allowing commercial flights for awhile...

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  23. From the press release... by Midnight+Ryder · · Score: 2, Funny

    Apple ignited the personal computer revolution in the 1970s with the Apple II and reinvented the personal computer in the 1980s with the Macintosh.


    Good work back in the 70's and 80's, but - what have you done for us lately? ;-)


    (Yes, that was a joke. When a dual G5 hit's the shelves with MacOS 10.1, I'm probably buying one!)

    --

    Davis Ray Sickmon, Jr - looking for something to read? Check out my three free novels at MidnightRyder.org

    1. Re:From the press release... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL no you won't. AMD/Intel will have their new processors out by then and you will be bowing to the greatness that is Windows XP! Bwa hahahahahahaaaa!

    2. Re:From the press release... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what have you done for us lately? ;-)

      IEEE 1394

      i could list more if you were seriously asking

  24. Monty Python on Advocacy: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Rabid Linux Geek: 'Evening, squire!
    Squire: (stiffly) Good evening.
    Rabid Linux Geek: Is, uh,...Is your wife a goer, eh? Know whatahmean, know whatahmean, nudge nudge, know whatahmean, say no more?
    Squire: I, uh, I beg your pardon?
    Rabid Linux Geek: Your, uh, your wife, does she go, eh, does she go, eh?
    Squire: (flustered) Well, she sometimes "goes", yes.
    Rabid Linux Geek: Aaaaaaaah bet she does, I bet she does, say no more, say no more, knowwhatahmean, nudge nudge?
    Squire: (confused) I'm afraid I don't quite follow you.
    Rabid Linux Geek: Follow me. Follow me. That's good, that's good! A nod's as good as a wink to a blind bat!
    Squire: Are you, uh,...are you selling something?
    Rabid Linux Geek: SELLING! Very good, very good! Ay? Ay? Ay? (pause) Oooh! Ya wicked Ay! Wicked Ay! Oooh hooh! Say No MORE!
    Squire: Well, I, uh....
    Rabid Linux Geek: Is, your uh, is your wife a sport, ay?
    Squire: Um, she likes sport, yes!
    Rabid Linux Geek: I bet she does, I bet she does!
    Squire: As a matter of fact she's very fond of cricket.
    Rabid Linux Geek: 'Oo isn't? Likes games, eh? Knew she would. Likes games, eh? She's been around a bit, been around?
    Squire: She has traveled, yes. She's from Scarsdale. (pause)
    Rabid Linux Geek: SAY NO MORE!!
    Rabid Linux Geek: Scarsdale, saynomore, saynomore, saynomore, squire!
    Squire: I wasn't going to!
    Rabid Linux Geek: Oh! Well, never mind. Dib dib? Is your uh, is your wife interested in....photography, ay? "Photographs, ay", he asked him knowlingly?
    Squire: Photography?
    Rabid Linux Geek: Snap snap, grin grin, wink wink, nudge nudge, say no more?
    Squire: Holiday snaps, eh?
    Rabid Linux Geek: They could be, they could be taken on holiday. Candid, you know, CANDID photography?
    Squire: No, no I'm afraid we don't have a camera.
    Rabid Linux Geek: Oh. (leeringly) Still, mooooooh, ay? Mwoohohohohoo, ay? Hohohohohoho, ay?
    Squire: Look... are you insinuating something?
    Rabid Linux Geek: Oh, no, no, no...yes.
    Squire: Well?
    Rabid Linux Geek: Well, you're a man of the world, squire.
    Squire: Yes...
    Rabid Linux Geek: I mean, you've been around a bit, you know, like, you've, uh.... You've "done it"....
    Squire: What do you mean?
    Rabid Linux Geek: Well, I mean like,....you've SLEPT, with a lady....
    Squire: Yes....
    Rabid Linux Geek: Do they run Linux?

    1. Re:Monty Python on Advocacy: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a good sketch but not as good as :

      (Mr Hilter)

      Knock. Door opens.

      Landlady: Hello, Mr and Mrs Johnson?

      Mr Johnson: Yes, that's right. Yes.

      Landlady: Oh, come on in. Excuse me not shaking hands, I've just been putting a bit of lard on the cat's boils. (Door closes)

      Johnson: Thank you.

      Landlady: Oh, you must be tired. It's a long way from Coventry, isn't it?

      Johnson: Well, we usually reckon on five and a half hours and it took us six hours and 53 minutes, with the 25 minute stop at Frampton Cottrell to stretch our legs; and we had to wait half an hour to get onto the M5 at Droitwich.

      Landlady: Really?

      Johnson: Then there was a three mile queue just before Bridgewater on the A38. We usually come round on the B3339, you see, just before Bridgewater.

      Landlady: Yeah. Really?

      Johnson: We decided to risk it 'cause they always say they're going to widen it there. Yes, well just by the intersection there where the A372 joins up. There's plenty of room to widen it there, there's only grass verges. They could get another six feet, knock down that hospital. Then we took the coast road through Williton - we got all the Taunton traffic on the A358 from Crowcombe and Stogumber.

      Landlady: Well you must be dying for a cup of tea.

      Johnson: Well, wouldn't say no, long as it's warm and wet.

      Landlady: Well come on in the lounge, I'm just going to serve afternoon tea.

      Johnson: Very nice.

      Landlady: Come on in, Mr and Mrs Johnson and meet Mr and Mrs Phillips.

      Mr Phillips: Good afternoon.

      Johnson: Good afternoon.

      Landlady: It's their third time here; we can't keep you away, can we? And over there is Mr Hitler.

      (In the corner are three German generals in full Nazi uniform, poring over a map.)

      Hitler: Ach. Ha! Gut time, er, gut afternoon.

      Landlady: Oho, planning a little excursion, eh, Mr Hitler?

      Hitler: Ja, ja, ve haff a little... (to Himmler) was ist Abweise bewegen?

      Himmler: Hiking.

      Hitler: Ah yes, ve make a little *hike* for Bideford.

      Johnson: Ah yes. Well, you'll want the A39. Oh, no, you've got the wrong map there. This is Stalingrad. You want the Ilfracombe and Barnstaple section.

      Hitler: Ah! Stalingrad! Ha ha ha, Heinri...Reginald, you have the wrong map here you silly old leg-before-vicket English person.

      Himmler: I'm sorry mein Fuhrer, mein (cough) mein Dickie old chum.

      Landlady: Oh, lucky Mr Johnson pointed that out. You wouldn't have had much fun in Stalingrad, would you? Ha ha. (stony silence) I said, you wouldn't have had much fun in Stalingrad, would you?

      Hitler: Not much fun in Stalingrad, no.

      Landlady: Oh I'm sorry. I didn't introduce you. This is Von. Von Ribbentrop.

      Johnson: Oh, not Von Ribbentrop, eh?

      Ribbentrop: Nein! Nein! Oh. Ha ha. Different other chap. I in Somerset am being born. Von Ribbentrop is born Gotterdammerstrasse 46, Dusseldorf Vest 8.....so they say!

      Landlady: And this is the quiet one, Heinrich Himmler.

      Himmler: Pleased to meet you, squire. I also am not of Minehead being born but I in your Peterborough Lincolnshire was given birth to. But am staying in Peterborough Lincolnshire house all time during vor, due to jolly old running sores, and vos unable to go in the streets or to go visit football matches or go to Nuremburg. Ha ha. Am retired vindow cleaner and pacifist, without doing war crimes. Oh...and am glad England vin Vorld Cup. Bobby Charlton. Martin Peters. And eating I am lots of chips and fish and hole in the toads and Dundee cakes on Piccadilly Line, don't you know old chap, vot! And I vos head of Gestapo for ten years.(Hitler elbows him in the ribs) Ah! Five years! (Hitler elbows him again, harder) Nein! No! Oh. NOT head of Gestapo AT ALL! I was not, I make joke! (laughs)

      Landlady: Oh, Mr Himmler. You do have us on! (Telephone rings) Oh excuse me. I'd better get that.

      Johnson: How long are you down here for, Mr Hitler, just the fortnight?

      Hitler: Vot you ask that for, are you a spy? Get on against the wall, Britischer Pig, you are going to die!

      Himmler: Take it easy, Dickie old chum!

      Ribbentrop: He's a bit on edge, Mr Johnson, he hasn't slept since 1945.

      Hitler: Shut your cake-hole, you Nazi!

      Ribbentrop: Cool it, Fuhrer cat!

      Himmler: Ha ha, the fun we have!

      Johnson: Haven't I seen you on the television?

      Hitler, Vibbentrop, & Himmler: (hastily) Nicht. Nein. No.

      Johnson: Simon Dee show, or was it Frosty?

      Hitler, Vibbentrop, & Himmler: Nein. No.

      Landlady: Telephone, Mr Hitler. It's Mr McGoering from the Bell and Compasses. He says he's found a place where you can hire bombers by the hour...?

      Hitler: If he opens his big mouth again, it's Lapschig time!

      Himmler: Shut up! Ha ha, hire bombers! He's a joker, that Scottish person.

      Ribbentrop: Good old Norman!

      Landlady: (to Johnson) He's on the phone the whole time now.

      Johnson: In business, is he?

      Himmler: Soon, baby!

      Landlady: Of course it's his big day Thursday. They've been planning it for months.

      Johnson: What's happening Thursday then?

      Landlady: Well it's the North Minehead bye-election. Mr Hitler's standing as the National Bocialist. He's got wonderful plans for Minehead!

      Johnson: Like what?

      Landlady: Well, for a start he wants to annex Poland.

      Johnson: North Minehead's Conservative, isn't it?

      Landlady: Well, yes, he gets a lot of people at his rallies.

      (Short scene cut: huge crowds outside going "Sieg Heil. Sieg Heil. Sieg Heil.")

      Hitler: I am not a racialist, but...and dis is a big but...the National Bocialist party says that das (stream of German).

      Himmler: Mr Hitler (Hitler slaps him) ...Hitler says historically Taunton is a part of Minehead already!

      Hitler: Und der Minehead ist nicht die letze (stream of German)...in die Welt!

      Crowd: Sieg Heil.

      ( Cut to interviews on the street: )

      Yokel: Oi don't loike the sound of these 'ere Boncentration Bamps.

      Woman: Well, I gave him my baby to kiss, and he bit it in the head!

      Upper class: Well, I think he'd do a lot of good to the Stock Exchange.

      Gumby: I THINK HE'S GOT BEAUTIFUL LEGS!

      Conservative: (droning) Well... well... as the Conservative candidate I just drone on and on and on and on without letting anyone else get a word in edgeways, until I start to froth at the mouth and fall over backwards. Ooo-aaahhh. (THUD)

    2. Re:Monty Python on Advocacy: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And while I'm pasting MP sketches why not do VISITORS FROM COVENTRY, another personal favorite. In fact it's probably the funniest thing I've ever seen. Or read.

      The sketch:
      (Scene opens to a sitting room. Low sexy lighting - ha ha - soft sexy music. On the sofa are Victor and Iris just beginning to make passes at each other.)

      Victor: Would you mind terribly if I hold your hand?

      Iris: Oh no, no, not at all.

      Victor: Oh Iris, you're so very beautiful.

      Iris: Oh, do you really mean that?

      Victor: I do, I do, I do. I think... I'm beginning to fall in love with you.

      Iris: Oh Victor.

      Victor: It's silly isn't it?

      Iris: No, no, not at all dear sweet Victor.

      Victor: No I didn't mean that. Only just us being so close together for so many months in the soft-toy department and yet never daring to...

      Iris: Oh, oh Victor.

      Victor: Oh Iris. (they move closer to kiss; just before their lips meet the doorbell goes) Who can that be?

      Iris: Oh, well you try and get rid of them.

      Victor: Yes I will, I will.

      (Victor opens the front door. Arthur Name is standing outside the door.)

      Arthur: Hello!

      Victor: Hello.

      Arthur: Remember me?

      Victor: No I'm...

      Arthur: In the pub. The tall thin one with the moustache, remember? About three years ago?

      Victor: No, I don't I'm afraid.

      Arthur: Oh, blimey, it's dark in here, (switches light on) that's better. Only you said we must have a drink together sometime, so I thought I'd take you up on it as the film society meeting was cancelled this evening.

      Victor: Look, to be frank, it is a little awkward this evening.

      Arthur: (stepping in; to Iris) Hello, I'm Arthur. Arthur Name. Name by name but not by nature. I always say that, don't I Vicky boy?

      Victor: Really...

      Arthur: (to Victor) Is that your wife?

      Victor: Er, no, actually.

      Arthur: Oh, I get the picture. Eh? Well don't worry about me Vicky boy, I know all about one-night stands.

      Victor: I beg your pardon?

      Arthur: Mind if I change the record? (takes the record off)

      Victor: Look, look, we put that on.

      Arthur: Here's a good one, I heard it in a pub. What's brown, what's brown and sounds like a bell?

      Victor: I beg your pardon?

      Arthur: What's brown and sounds like a bell? Dung! Ha, ha, ha, that's a good one. I like that one, I won't keep you long. (the gramophone plays the 'Washington Post March' very loud) That's better, now don't worry about me. I'll wait here till you've finished.

      (The doorbell goes again.)

      Victor: Who the hell...

      Arthur: I'll get it. It'll be friends of mine. I took the liberty of inviting them along.

      Victor: Look, we were hoping to have a quiet evening on our own.

      Arthur: Oh, they won't mind. They're very broad-minded. Hello!

      (He opens the door; Mr and Mrs Equator walk in and go straight up to Victor.)

      Brian: Good evening. My name is Equator, Brian Equator. Like round the middle of the Earth, only with an L. (wheezing laugh) This is my wife Audrey, she smells a bit but she has a heart of gold.

      Audrey: Hello, ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha...

      Victor: There must have been some kind of misunderstanding, because this is not the...

      Brian: Who's that then?

      Victor: What?

      Brian: Who's the bird?

      Victor: I'm...

      Brian: You got a nice pair there haven't you love. (puts hand on Iris's boobs and gives a wet kiss; Iris screams) Shut up you silly bitch, it was only a bit of fun.

      Victor: Now look here ...

      Brian: Big gin please.

      Arthur: I'll get it.

      Victor: (going after Arthur) Look, leave those drinks alone.

      Audrey: And three tins of beans for me please.

      Brian: I told you to lay off the beans, you whore!

      Audrey: I only want three cans.

      Brian: Button your lip you rat-bag. (laughs uproariously)

      Audrey: (joins in) Ha, ha, ha, ha...

      Brian: It was rather witty, wasn't it? Where's my gin?

      (The doorbell goes.)

      Victor: Who the hell's that?

      Brian: Oh, I took the liberty of inviting an old friend along, as his wife has just passed away, and he's somewhat distraught poor chap. I hope you don't mind.

      Arthur: (opening door) Come on in.

      (In walks Mr Freight in underpants, sequins, eye make-up, white wellies, and necklace.)

      Mr Freight: Oh? My God, what a simply ghastly place.

      Brian: Not too good is it? A pint of crème de menthe for my friend. Well how are you, you great poof? (sits down) Bit lumpy ...ah, no wonder, I was sitting on the cat. (throws it into fire)

      Iris: Aaaagh! Boo boo hooo.

      Mr Freight: I've asked along a simply gorgeous little man I picked up outside the Odeon.

      Brian: Is he sexy?

      (In walks Mr Cook with a goat. Freight kisses him.)

      Mr Cook: I had to bring the goat, he's not well. I only hope he don't go on the carpet.

      Brian: (to Iris) Come on then love, drop 'em.

      Iris: Aaaaaaagh! (runs out)

      Brian: Blimey, she don't go much do she.

      (He sits in chair which collapses.)

      Audrey: Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, oooooh! I've wet 'em

      Mr Cook: The goat's just done a bundle.

      (A group of singers run on, dressed as Welsh miners. All talk at once.)

      Victor: Look, get out all of you. Go on. Get out! Get t~ul!

      Brian: I beg your pardon?

      Victor: I'm turning you all out. I'm not having my house filled with filthy perverts, now look, I'm giving you just hall' a minute then I'm going to call the police, so get out.

      Brian: I don't much like the tone of your voice. (shoots him) Right let's have a ding dong...

      All: (singing) Ding dong merrily on high, in Heaven the bells are ringing etc...

  25. Hate to say it by macdaddy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    but as much as I'd like to see things continue like normal, it is probably wise to cancel events such as these for a short time. Air travel has suffered a horrific blow that has made many unsure of the safety of air travel. I hate to see the world shut down over this but some things should be put on hold for a little while.

    1. Re:Hate to say it by csbruce · · Score: 2

      Ironically, air travel is probably much safer today than it was two weeks ago because of increased security and the likelihood that terrorists will use a different means of attack next time.

    2. Re:Hate to say it by banuaba · · Score: 2

      If people cancel events like this, and if people change the way that they lead thier lives, then the terrorists win.

      We cannot allow these dirtbags to change our way of life, both as Americans and as citizens on the world stage. What happened on Tuesday was terrible, but it was (as far as existing data indicates) essentially unpreventable for we Americans living the lives that we do. Freedom comes with a price, and that price is danger and risk.
      We could change.
      we could close our borders to all Arabs.
      We could have full time tracking of all citizens.
      We could require people to be naked and locked up on all airline flights.

      I don't want to live in that country. I am willing to take the chance that there is some crazy asshole out there who wants to kill me. The reason I am willing to take that chance is because the rewards that I and that the rest of the country get are so very great.

      We cannot live in fear. If we do so, they win.

      --


      Brant

      Argle. Bargle.
    3. Re:Hate to say it by Computer! · · Score: 1

      Just a guess, but you don't live in Texas, do you?

      Certainly not New York, because New Yorkers have been living without most of their personal freedoms since as long as I can remember.

      Safety first. Check Maslow's Hierarchy for further reference.

      --
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
    4. Re:Hate to say it by macdaddy · · Score: 2

      I agree. We shouldn't stop our lives. If we do, they win. That's the message that Congress and the House was trying to get across to us on the night of the incidents. Still I can see the point in postponing some of these events. What the terrorists did was very symbolic. It was an attack on America and our ideals. What better thing to attack than a major league baseball game. That's truly American. I can understand Apple's concerns with the Paris Expo. We simply can't be sure that France will take all possible security precautions to protect this event. France hasn't been attacked yet so their guard may be down or not as high as our's is right now. Plus all aircraft were grounded. If half the people can't get to their destination for their event (ball game, expo, conference, whatever) how can the people having the conference justify going through with it. Now that things a more under control I think we should all go out and have a huge public showing of support. Fireworks and singing sounds good.

  26. WTC terrorists == airline security consultants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    One good thing to come out of this tradgedy -- NO ONE will ever successfully hijaak a passenger airliner ever again. The minute they try to take over, they'll be swarmed over by all the passengers and stomped into bloody bits.

    1. Re:WTC terrorists == airline security consultants by cmeans · · Score: 1
      We can only hope...but we Americans have a short memory...

    2. Re:WTC terrorists == airline security consultants by cricket · · Score: 1

      One good thing to come out of this tradgedy -- NO ONE will ever successfully hijaak a passenger airliner ever again. The minute they try to take over, they'll be swarmed over by all the passengers and stomped into bloody bits.

      Except that passengers can no longer carry even plastic knives or fingernail clippers. Typical reaction to disarm the public to 'protect' them from crime.

    3. Re:WTC terrorists == airline security consultants by TWR · · Score: 2
      True, but the next attack isn't going to come on a plane.

      My guess: nuclear bomb on a boat in NYC's harbor. You read it here first.

      -jon

      --

      Remember Amalek.

    4. Re:WTC terrorists == airline security consultants by Genoaschild · · Score: 0

      One good thing to come out of this tradgedy -- NO ONE will ever successfully hijaak a passenger airliner ever again.

      Yeah right. Give it ten or so years and someone will hi-jack a plane. They will find away around. They always do.

      --
      Just because a bunch of people believe or do something stupid, doesn't make it any less stupid.
    5. Re:WTC terrorists == airline security consultants by Genoaschild · · Score: 0

      Why go in NY harbor when you can drive in the middle of New York in a pickup van and set it off their?

      --
      Just because a bunch of people believe or do something stupid, doesn't make it any less stupid.
    6. Re:WTC terrorists == airline security consultants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although I have the awful habit of biting my nails, I still have teeth, fists, feet and a skull that's pretty damn hard. Plus, it's kind of hard to stand your ground when you've got a dozen people trying to stomp on your head.

    7. Re:WTC terrorists == airline security consultants by TWR · · Score: 2
      There are three advantages to using the boat method:

      1. There's no need to clear any sort of customs. The more you move the bomb, the more people might see it.

      2. A large cloud of radioactive steam will be created, killing millions more from radiation poisoning and cancer.

      3. It's a terror attack. Americans are now scared of planes. A boat-based nuke will make American scared of boats. Slowly, the US cuts itself off from the world, which is what Bin Laden and his ilk wants.

      Personally, I think we're doomed to lose this battle because we aren't willing to be nearly as evil as our enemy. It wasn't always like this. As mentioned in an editoral in the Washington Post (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A41 213-2001Sep16.html), the US killed 900,000 Japanese civilians (not including Hiroshima and Nagasaki!) in the closing months of WWII. Today, we won't do that, even though the stakes are far higher today than they were against a Japan that was isolated, out of fuel, and starving.

      Meanwhile, our enemy hides among civilians, and has no qualms about using anything as a weapon. We have qualms about killing the civilians they surround themselves with. In short, we're fucked. Even after we are nuked and gassed and exposed to smallpox and anthrax, we won't do what's necessary to save our civilization against the Hordes.

      Ah well, it was a good civilization while it lasted.

      -jon

      --

      Remember Amalek.

    8. Re:WTC terrorists == airline security consultants by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

      My guess: nuclear bomb on a boat in NYC's harbor. You read it here first.

      I think you're definitely on the right track...however I disagree with you on where--I think they are gonna go West and give up the East for a bit.

      See, these terrorists are really big on the symbolism thing...not just any building--but the WTC--not just any airline, but the two big ones--AA and United (in the old days, it woulda been TWA and Pan Am.)

      So given that, and choosing something with lots of symbolism, I say the Golden Gate bridge and other areas in SFO.

    9. Re:WTC terrorists == airline security consultants by TWR · · Score: 2
      Or LA. Source of the chief export of American culture, our TV and film industry.

      Either way, the US can't win unless we're willing to kill about a billion people first. We're not. We'll lose.

      -jon

      --

      Remember Amalek.

    10. Re:WTC terrorists == airline security consultants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nahh...even rabid religious fanatics get discouraged after the first 10-20m get whacked.

      But if you're right, should you wait for them, or just kill yourself now? Better play it safe. Do it now.

    11. Re:WTC terrorists == airline security consultants by TWR · · Score: 2
      Nahh...even rabid religious fanatics get discouraged after the first 10-20m get whacked.

      Really? Then Islamic fanatics must be losing their nerve; the wars of conquest which spread Islam killed more, (pro-rated to the current world population).

      I don't think the Muslim fundamentalists will stop until every Christian and Jew (and non-fanatical Muslim) on the planet is dead. What they may not realize is that the world will be destroyed by the US response to these terror attacks. Or perhaps they do realize, and want to destroy us all. I dunno.

      But if you're right, should you wait for them, or just kill yourself now? Better play it safe. Do it now.

      We live to say NO to death. Dying for a cause is easy. Living for one is hard.

      -jon

      --

      Remember Amalek.

    12. Re:WTC terrorists == airline security consultants by Genoaschild · · Score: 0

      You're telling me that it wouldn't be just as effective to drive a nuke into the middle of NY
      with a car and set off a nuke then to go to NY harbor and to blow it off their. Both would produced a nuclear cloud. NY customs? Ha. Build it in the US and you don't have to go through customs or you could smuggle it through Mexico by paying off the guards to look the other way. They would be both pretty damn effective. If you go your way, now you have to worry about the coast guard. If you want the most people dead, you'll have to blow it up a few hundred stories in mid-air. That way it get a little more range.

      --
      Just because a bunch of people believe or do something stupid, doesn't make it any less stupid.
    13. Re:WTC terrorists == airline security consultants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm,

      We are going to kill a million civilians to "save civilization" ?!?

      Might save your ass, but you are not going to be part of any kind of civilization after you do that...

    14. Re:WTC terrorists == airline security consultants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not a US plane anyway. now the brazillian airlines, mexican airlines, russian airlines, and all others should still be plenty easy to hijack for destructive purposes.

      or, if they want to, the terrorists could very easily buy their OWN aircraft

    15. Re:WTC terrorists == airline security consultants by Genoaschild · · Score: 0

      Depends really. In WWII, Japan would've fought to the very last man. We would've had to wipe out Japan before the war was over. Nuking them prevented millions of American soldiers and an entire civilization from being destroyed. Sometimes the most gruesome decision is the best one but this is rarely the case.

      --
      Just because a bunch of people believe or do something stupid, doesn't make it any less stupid.
  27. Jobs's full letter to employees by HerrNewton · · Score: 5, Informative

    Snagged from Macnn.com:

    Message from Steve

    From: Steve Jobs
    Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 07:12:15 -0700 (PDT)
    Subject: Message from Steve

    Team,

    Last week's devastating and tragic events have touched everyone at
    Apple. We are all grieving for the victims and their families.
    Thankfully, no Apple team members were among them. I know many of
    you have taken time to support various relief efforts, give blood,
    and support those around you. We all appreciate your extra efforts
    to do so.

    I want to let you know that Apple is donating one million dollars to
    the families of the firefighters, police and other emergency
    response personnel who lost their lives, through the American Red
    Cross Disaster Relief Fund. In addition, we will donate one iBook to
    each of these families with children this holiday season.

    Also, today we are announcing the cancellation of Apple Expo 2001,
    which was scheduled to take place in Paris on September 26-30. We
    are very sorry to disappoint our customers and developers, but their
    safety must be our primary concern at this time. Apple is a very
    visible American company, and having a highly publicized event at
    this time would be irresponsible.

    We are also taking extra precautions to insure our safety. Apple
    security will remain on heightened alert at all our facilities
    around the world for the foreseeable future. Please immediately
    report any suspicious events or personnel to security.

    It's going to take time for the world to return to "normal", and
    some things will never return to the way they were. The next few
    months may be rocky. Please take the time you need for your
    families, and please lean on one another. Together, we will all get
    through this.

    I want to commend everyone for their efforts throughout this
    difficult time. As always, I am very proud of this team.

    Steve

    --

    ----
    Am I the only one who thinks Microsoft is a misnomer? Perhaps Macrosoft would be a better fit?
    1. Re:Jobs's full letter to employees by Teun · · Score: 1
      but their safety must be our primary concern at this time. Apple is a very visible American company, and having a highly publicized event at this time would be irresponsible.

      This is stupid, just what these terrorists want! It's not them bringing society on its knees, it's stupid and cowardly decisions like this one of Steve Jobs that is causing the damage.
      Security has never been tighter around air travel then right now.
      I'm disgusted!

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    2. Re:Jobs's full letter to employees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is stupid, just what these terrorists want!

      Regarding terrorists, the only right thing to do is to find them and make them pay for their crimes. They are lunatics, who knows what they are thinking. Although by resisting to change our way of life, we may be deterring the terrorists from reaching their goals. However, it would be counter-productive to the relief efforts and to ensuring each of our safety if we were to bring our mentality to their level.

      I think this is a matter of Steve getting priorities straight, which IMHO he has. Steve has chosen to slow down their usual way of business by cancelling an Expo. There are two benefits I can think of for people who were originally planning to go:

      (1) Abstenance from a potentially deadly event. You never know what extremes the terrorist cults will go to.
      (2) Gives time for people to reflect on the crisis, and the fact that there are those suffering greatly.

      Thinking smart like that is definately Apple's usual way, and I shouldn't want that to change!

    3. Re:Jobs's full letter to employees by burgess · · Score: 1

      well, you go fly around for a bit, but steve is under no obligation to you to fly his employees about while planes are dropping out of the sky.

      if you want to prove it's so safe right now, you fly.

  28. Sigh! by gordzilla · · Score: 1

    Welcome to the NEW world, folks! Not only can I for see the absolutely diabolical events of the last week doing more of this sort of thing, that the realization that "we" are no longer safe in
    large crowds.

    I'm wondering if there's going to be a Superbowl, Academy Awards...

    :-(

    1. Re:Sigh! by phillymjs · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I'm sure there will be a Super Bowl, but the tight security at the one during the Gulf War will pale in comparison to what is forthcoming.

      I'm sure a good many people who will be planning the security have read The Sum of All Fears, and think of it as a worst-case scenario. This year we'll probably see fighter jets patrolling the skies for a good distance around the stadium, and possibly a military presence providing security on the ground. Metal detectors at every entrance. We'll probably see much the same at the Olympics in SLC.

      ~Philly

    2. Re:Sigh! by wareadams · · Score: 1

      I have to say that security on the grounds isn't all that bad. I went to the World Cup in France in '98 which is obviously a decent target, and the security was quite tight (everyone was frisked at least once at every stadium, at the US-Iran game everyone was frisked twice).

      The thing is, the French were incredibly efficient about it. Every stadium had a several block area around it cordoned off where only ticket holders could go. To get into the stadium itself you were frisked. They had a set of male and female military types that exceeded the number of lines, so there was no backlogged to be frisked. The people doing the work were unbelievably efficient...I repeatedly saw the smallest Swiss Army knives (the keychain type) caught, and they were given to a booth where they could be retrieved after the game.

      It added no time to getting into the game, and it really added a sense of safety within the stadium. Certainly there were games that were tough to control (England/Tunisia, the game where a German hooligan attacked a police officer), but I thought the French did an incredible job.

      My point is, done well the extra security is no burden and allows you to enjoy the game. Further, I felt no lack of privacy or violation of basic rights at not being allowed to carry a knife into a game, particularly since I could just pick it up at the booth afterwards.

    3. Re:Sigh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm wondering if there's going to be a Superbowl, Academy Awards..."

      heaven forbid that we should go a year without the festival of barley & testosterone, or the annual billionaire ass-kissing party.

  29. This reminds me of the 80s by Rupert · · Score: 2

    I forget what the event was, but numerous luminaries in the US film business (most memorably Sylvester Stallone, since it was the Rambo era) refused to go to Cannes.

    --

    --
    E_NOSIG
  30. Get back to life by Swaffs · · Score: 1

    This isn't meant to be heartless, but I think the world needs to get back to life as normal. I don't think the threats to security are any greater now than they have ever been, and we need to return to normal life for the sake of the economy. When are all these cancellations going to end?

    --

    --
    "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." - Homer Simpson [1F10]

  31. Taco, we need new moderation categories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    like -1 Dumbass for example

    1. Re:Taco, we need new moderation categories by mazur · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Subject: Re:Taco, we need new moderation categories

      like -1 Dumbass for example

      True, but why only name your own category?

      • Off the top of my head:
      • Tried to be funny, but failed: -1
      • Might be true, might be insiteful, but I don't wanna hear it, d'ya hear!: -1.
      • Eye don' like some bludy furriner critisizing my true blue, lone star, 'merican views: -1
      • Can't think, can't spell, can annoy a little: -1.
      • Aaim two bloody boozed up two care: random(-1,0,+1)
      • And for metamoderation
      • Moderator might find it insightful, and from their point of view it might be, but their point of view is off.
      • It is offtopic, but it raises an important point which can never be addressed, unless such a discussion would be started, which might happen when pigs go aviatory.
        • Ok, if i'd really think about it I would come up with more, and only serious ones, but I'll stop for the nonce.

          Stefan.

      --
      The truth shall make you fret. (Ankh-Morpork tImes motto)
  32. Dark Days A Plenty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Dark Days A Plenty
    (shamelessly reprinted without permission)

    by Mark Driver

    Rotten. Fucking rotten. That's all I'm feeling in the wake. My stomach's the size of a walnut, and my mind is gray and
    gooey, like a big dumb oyster. Unresponsive. I haven't felt like doing much of anything since Tuesday. Even smiling
    makes me feel guilty. Tuesday was the most horrible day I've ever lived, and days later I'm still not shaking this feeling of
    sick. I'm bummed to the core.

    I had been up drinking until 4 in the morning before, so when my mom called five times in a row around 7am P.S.T. on
    Tuesday, I was not polite or pleasant as my face hit the receiver. "It's fucking seven o'clock in the morning!" I screamed
    into the phone, assuming she was the East Coast salesperson from CRW that liked to call at six or seven in the morning
    and tell me about exciting deals from the company that I bought an infrared mouse from like three years ago and had
    been getting hounded by ever since.

    "Well, sorry," my mom said, snippy and pissed, "I just thought you'd want to witness history." She hung up on me. I
    rubbed my pulsing head and squinted through dry eyes, trying not to get too awake. I turned on the television just in time
    to see the second tower of the World Trade Center collapse. I tried to shake the muck from my skull, tried to comprehend
    what was happening. Click. Click. Click. Bang!

    "Yo, girl!" I shouted into the bedroom. "Get up! Get yer skinny ass outta bed!"

    I've had a really good run of not caring about "Big News Events", because they always seem staged, wrapped in
    manipulation, every camera shot teeming with vampires just out of the picture, using whatever tragedy it was to further
    whatever cause they were always schlepping around town.

    On Tuesday, the initial reporting was black and white, fact-based, straight-up reporting on the awful situation. The eyes
    of anchorpeople were grim and frantic. Their guests were speechless. The anti-septic news façade was broken and
    everyone looked and sounded just like regular human beings. But as the initial shock wore off, the networks got their
    graphics together and the politicians got their agendas in line.

    There were some very bizarre things said. The CIA got to go first.

    "We need more human resources in our worldwide surveillance networks. We need informants. It's dirty work. This is a
    dirty business and in gathering information we are forced to deal with some not so nice people. Congress must
    understand and accept this." All fine and well, but do I need thirteen different officials reading the SAME EXACT
    WORDS from the memo pulled off their fax machine five minutes before the interview?

    Other phrases I heard:

    "America is a different country now." Oh, and I suppose we need a new Constitution too.

    "America has lost her innocence." Um, I'm not sure if you can call a global superpower, the only country to have ever
    dropped nuclear bombs 'innocent', but I'll go along with it for now.

    "How many civil liberties are Americans now willing to give up in the wake of these attacks?" Um, well, I'll be willing to
    wait in long lines at the airport. That's about it. Thanks for asking.

    Then there was the Congressional dipshit who said with a straight face, "this just underscores the need for a national
    missile defense system."

    "But could a missile defense system have stopped this attack?" asked the interviewer.

    "I think it's too early to tell," the Congressman said, keeping that straight face.

    A man in a blue suit said, "we must be patriotic. And selling all your stocks when the markets re-open is certainly not
    patriotic. All real patriots will know not to dump their holdings out of fear." Um, OK. I thought that patriotism was something
    else. Apparently it's a financial term. I stand corrected.

    In a brilliant display of foreign policy analysis, Taliban-esque Jerry "Jerk Me Off" Falwell and Pat "I'm a Koala"
    Roberson blamed the terrorist attacks on God's displeasure with the ACLU, pro-lifers, feminists, and homosexuals. No
    shit. Now I certainly don't have the life experience of a man who has slept with prostitutes, nor do I have the bedrock
    ethics of a man who stole a religious broadcasting business from his trusting partner, but I'd imagine these guys would be
    hard pressed to find a problem in the U.S. that wasn't directly tied to the homosexual agenda. Budget crisis? Homosexual
    agenda. Fall in wheat prices? Homosexual agenda. Scrapped NASA launches? Homosexual agenda. That's quite a sexy
    worldview, huh?

    And then there was our President who scampered around like a scared chimp all day Tuesday and then tried to explain
    his skittishness away on Wednesday. Like yer one friend who hides in the corner during a bar brawl and stands up after
    the fighting's over saying something like "I was looking out for the police." Apparently, uh, Air Force One was in threat
    of being, er, hit midair by amateur pilots in 757s, so while the entire country wracked itself with spasms of fear and
    uncertainty, the leader of the free world was hiding underground, watching Home Alone II, eating imported spumoni, and
    getting back massages from his handlers. And when he did finally emerge from the safety of his bunker, he was not
    reassuring. I wasn't relieved or impressed. I was nervous he was gonna say something stupid. Luckily he kept to his
    platitudes and pronounced his simple words correctly. I suppose that's all we can ask of the guy. (Conspiracy note: Has
    anyone actually seen Dick Cheney since it all began?)

    Back to the tragedy. Not like you need to hear it from me, but IT'S SO FUCKING AWFUL! Total bullshit. And the stupidest
    thing that these terrorists could have done. What a bunch of rednecks.

    Yes, rednecks. Think about it. Rural kids, all pumped up about God and Country, easily manipulated by Men With Big
    Plans. OK, maybe they're against blue jeans and booze, but they're also against women with jobs and the toleration of
    those with outsider beliefs. They site the crumbling of religious values as the basis for the downfall of their society. They
    live in isolated, economically poor communities. They are so filled with God's love, they want to kill for him. Provincials
    that smell like piss, fed this warped world view that every American is a die-hard supporter of Israel and a ardent hater
    of Arabs. You swap some enemies around, and what you've got is a good ol' fashioned redneck.

    I'd say that most Americans didn't really think about Arab issues at all until Tuesday. Your average factory worker
    probably hated Jews and Arabs equally and would have had a hard time forming an opinion as to which one he would
    cheer for. Well, those who didn't have an opinion certainly do now. And those who were supporters of the Palestinians
    and Arab-rights are suddenly feeling what the Israelis have been feeling forthe past twenty years. Fair or not, guess
    how much public support Palestine's getting right about now ...

    This is a truth. One we must face. America is an imperialist nation with economic interests all over the globe, willing to
    protect them by any means necessary. American Democracy, arrogantly enough, is only available to Americans. To
    protect our "interests" we have a long and depressing history of propping up unpopular dictator creeps all over this
    globe to exert control within the region and keep business scooting along as usual. Sound far fetched? Any idiot capable
    of locating the public library can look to our policy in Latin America, specifically in the countries of Nicaragua and El
    Salvador, and see why more than half the countries south of Florida would shoot an American on sight.

    We even pulled this off in Iran with that stooge of a Shah in the1950's. CIA trained officers and British MI6 agents didn't
    like the fact that current Iranian president Mosaddeq was going to nationalize the oil industry and pull it from British and
    American control. So, they took him out of office and put in the Shah, a tyrannical ruler who clamped down in democratic
    Iran with a secret police force equally as repressive as the drooling moose of the Taliban. And then, in 1979, after nearly
    25 years of bullshit, religious revolution kicked the Shah in the butt and the U.S. was uncordially shown to the door with
    more than a few hurt feelings. So then we gave arms to Iraq to fight Iran. And then Iraq became a formidable regional
    power. And then we had to fight Iraq. And now we have huge bases in Saudi Arabia. It all works out quite well. No
    wonder we have such high opinions of ourselves.

    The main reason we're even involved in any of this Middle East business in the first place is the oil, the only reason
    we've cared about Israel from the beginning was because we needed a reliable oil foothold. In gaining that foothold
    we've made enemies, half of whom we spent the better part of many years arming with tanks and planes.

    Combine this with our insane fear of Soviet Communism, the crazy loathing of the Russians evident even as their empire
    groaned and fumbled. Like in the war with Afghanistan that became their own Vietnam. Many of the Afghani solders who
    sent the Ruskies a' packin' are now leaders of the ruling Taliban. And where did you think the Taliban learned guerrilla
    fighting techniques? Where do you think International Supercrook Osama bin Laden learned to shoot his first AK-47?
    Not at the Learning Annex. Like the Contras, the CIA trained many Islamic fundamentalists in the fine art of warfare and
    improvised munitions, and then gave them plenty of military equipment to terrorize the Russians with. Well, guess who the
    Holy Warriors came after once Russians left? That's right, the U.S., the other world giant taking big, meaty dumps in their
    backyard.

    We still exert economic influence over the region. This is why we are resented. They are not jealous of our lifestyle. They
    do not hate our freedom. They hate us.

    What we are feeling now is the cost of doing business worldwide.

    And I'm not saying this to kick America while it's down. I'm saying this because before we roll out the tanks, we need to
    take an honest look at ourselves, our place in the world, the reality that we are not this insulated happyland of freedom
    and success that official press releases say we are. We are a nation that has always struggled to balance commerce
    with ideals, a balance that has been completely out of whack of late. The insane quest for insane profit has outspent our
    decency, our ethics, our basic humanity. We've become a nation of businesspeople first, and living things second.

    But not this week. This week is different. Look around you. People are actually being nice. Quiet. Thoughtful. Helping
    each other. Volunteering. Nothing like a war to give you some prospective.

    Yes, war. Network hyperbole aside, America was attacked. But the America attacked was not the Government and it was
    not the President. As much as the news harped on about how safe the President was, I don't think many viewers cared
    that much about him. It was the people on the planes, the victims buried in the wreckage that they cared about. America
    is the people who are in New York City and Washington right now, above and below ground, doing whatever they can.
    It's the heroes who rushed the cabin of Flight 93 and crashed themselves in Pennsylvania. It's the shopkeepers who
    gave survivors and rescuers water and wine and sandwiches free of charge. It's the lines of blood givers, of tent donors,
    volunteers from neighboring states working unpaid 12 hour shifts. It is normal people who are pasted to their television
    sets, sickened to their stomachs, sad beyond anything they've felt. My best friend missed his own mom's funeral
    because of closed airports. Another friend, with two family members on the NYPD, spent all of Tuesday trying the phone,
    throwing up and crying. A woman I know living on the Lower East Side had to explain to her six year old kid about
    terrorism while trying to shield him from people jumping from 95th floor windows and disappearing into clouds of dust.
    This is the America that was attacked. And this is the America that will retaliate.

    When the military goes marching off, it will be with nearly the full screaming support of the American public. This has not
    been the case for many decades. The Gulf War was nothing more than a business venture and everyone knew it. It was
    fought with very limited public support. This war, however, will have across the board support, world wide support.
    Americans have been attacked on their soil, and now they want a fight.

    Jesus, Afghanistan, do you really want a full-blown war with America? Are you that nuts? Do you know the most widely
    held virtue here is winning at all costs? Have you seen the lines of scary people waiting to sign up at the army recruiter?
    Do you really want to mess with these folks? Have you ever been to the South? Seen professional football? Do you
    know what our murder rate is like? We kill each other for fun in America, and you just gave a whole lot of bored maniacs
    something to do with the next four years of their lives. Our regular Armed Forces are scary enough, but it's the
    volunteers you're gonna have to look out for. These people play the lottery, eat seventeen pounds of ground beef daily,
    crush beer cans on their heads, and don't know there's a difference between Chinese and Japanese people. You really
    want them wandering around your country with bazookas?

    Oh, man, Afghanistan. Just turn on the TV and see how doomed you are. They're cueing the reels of little kids saying
    the pledge of allegiance. A seven year old is holding up a picture of his missing fireman father. A WWII vet is sitting in a
    wheelchair with a flag in his hand. The camera is pulling in close on the President singing the Battle Hymn of the
    Republic. The Battle Hymn of the Republic! YOU ARE SO FUCKED!

    Think about it, it couldn't be more perfect. Here we sit, tottering on a horrible recession. Unemployment is way up. We
    have a military who has been begging for a real fight since the Gulf. We have an America who hasn't had a mission in a
    long time, an America floundering with the possibility that the last great frontier was to be completely colonized by
    multinational corporations. Not anymore. We've got marching orders now. All aboard!

    Yes, 20 scrawny guys with patchy beards have just brought a world-sized posse led by Marshall Death into their
    remote country campgrounds. People from Moscow to Rome are tired of living in fear, of watching planes go down, of
    digging out from body bombs. They are spoiling for a fight too. It seems that Islamic terrorists haven't made too many
    friends in international circles over the years. The world is ready to bid them farewell.

    And soon, when everything is in place, a warbling call from George W. will be made. "Strategical whooping will
    commensurate at once!" he will say, and the machines will proceed to begin killing with surgical accuracy, although I
    have a feeling there will be a few unintended targets hit every now and then like, oh, I don't know, every single standing
    building in Afghanistan. Yes, for the first time in sixty years, we have right on our side. We will be the good guys. And
    with righteousness on our side, there is no limit to the carnage we can create. There will be no restraint. You just wait
    and see.

    And honestly, I'm all for it. I want blood. I want to see terrorists running through the desert with napalm in their beards. I
    want to see them pulling their brothers from the rubble. I want to see them frantically calling everyone they know in Kabul
    after a bombing run to see who's still alive. This is not kneejerk, this is not reptile brain, this is not armchair quarterback.
    This is revenge pure and simple. Politics and causes and motivations aside, these yahoos brought war to my doorstep.
    They are willing to spill my blood and the blood of others not involved in their little fights. These raccoon-eyed rednecks
    with a world-view the size of a third prize shoe-box diorama took their tiny ideas of how the world should be and used
    them to kill thousands of civilians. Caused real pain. To people I know. To people I don't know. They stabbed
    stewardesses to death with razor blades to draw pilots out of the cockpit. They crashed planes full of innocents into
    buildings full of more. They were funded and supported by nations who are now looking forward to Holy War with the
    U.S. We cannot hide behind 'violence is wrong' or 'give peace a chance' This goes beyond T-shirt ideology. This is for
    real. This is war. And like it or not, part of the battle field will be your own village.

    And soon, we will be walking their villages. With machine guns. Looking for people to burn. There will be brothers of
    firemen, of cops, of janitors, of pilots, roaring into their villages in desert vehicles smelling of diesel fuel and spent oil.
    These men will not be worrying about stooping to anyone's level. They will not give peace a chance. They, like me, will
    want to see ten thousand times the destruction in New York. And who can blame them?

    Hell, I was so drunk and pissed Thursday night that if the Army Reserve Recruitment Office was open 24 hours I'd be
    carrying a machine gun right now. And this is coming from someone who opposes nearly every war the U.S. has ever
    fought, who thinks the American Way of Life has been co-opted into a shallow shell of embarrassing consumer
    selfishness, who would love to see a full Israeli pullout from the occupied territories, and is one hundred percent
    sickened by nearly every aspect of U.S. foreign policy for the past 200 years.

    But I will not tolerate this shit in my neighborhood. They have brought it to me. I will cheer it back upon them a million
    fold.

    And yet I hesitate. One thing that keeps me, and a lot of other cynics, from allowing myself to completely be lost in this
    mass mind of warfare is the track record of our warrior past. U.S. administrations have called upon our patriotism many
    times they shouldn't have, many times that they did not deserve it. They have exploited honest patriotism of American
    citizens to further their own political agendas, agendas that did not benefit human freedom or American idealism in any
    way. I was too young for Vietnam, but that was not a good war. The invasion of Panama was criminal. I have four
    buddies who fought in the Gulf and even they will tell you that they were 'just doing their job'. Yes, they love America
    and were proud to be soldiers and would certainly lay their lives down for the Army brother or sister fighting next to them,
    but that mission was one that did not hold their hearts.

    And now, it finally seems like some patriotism is warranted. But I am so conditioned to the manipulation of good people
    towards bad ideas - people who trust too much and just want to do the right thing. And now it appears that right thing
    finally has come along, but the same old wolves are at the controls.

    In this situation I must remember the ideals that this country were founded on. Freedom of speech. Freedom of action.
    Freedom from religion. I do believe in them. I would die for them. These ideals that form the basis of American Democracy
    are based in common sense, yet are inspirational beyond words. And even if we have been routinely led away from the
    sort of America that these ideals attempt to establish, they are there for us to come back to in times of tragedy.

    So I'm in. Let's go get the bastards.

    Much of the opinion around the Middle East is that America is a cowardly nation who uses others to fight its wars, that it
    has grown soft and passive in its sinful Western decadence. I have a feeling that opinion is going to see a bit of a
    revision in the weeks to come.

    If you were horrified to see them dancing in the streets, rest assured. Soon, they will have no legs.

    PS - Seeing the world give their respects to the victims of this nightmare puts a fist sized lump in my throat. The rest of
    the world has been dealing with terrorism for decades that saw America mostly apathetic and untouched. These
    countries have compassion. They understand. I hope my fellow Americans will remember these scenes forever, and
    recall them whenever they start to say anything stupid about anyone who lives outside of these borders.

    PPS - My friend Saiid (or the 'Lebanese Stallion' as we like to call him) has asked that people stop throwing bottles at
    him from moving cars. Saiid's not a terrorist, he's a Sagittarius. He has also requested at least a slowdown in the amount
    of telephoned death threats being called in to the Mosque his parents attend. His dad is an insane fanatic, but for the
    Seattle Mariners baseball team. His mom bakes a mean apple kataifi and serves it with a refreshing Lemon Yogurt-ade. If
    you see him, his folks, or any of his brothers, smile and say hi to them, OK? For me?

    1. Re:Dark Days A Plenty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is one reprint that deserves to be modded up.

    2. Re:Dark Days A Plenty by FrenchyCologne · · Score: 1

      Quite interesting for several reasons: -Nicely written, loaded with macabre humor, and on target as far as the "redneck" angle is concerned. -Most unusual to find this kind of political/historical awareness of American crimes around the world, coming from an American!!! -But unfortunately, he proves unable to draw the obvious conclusions from his awareness, and resorts to the usual jingoism and "let's fuck up the gooks responsible for this" attitude. Understandable in many ways, but... Here is another one who expects a cakewalk through the Hindu Kush, and who is going to be cruelly disappointed. The dancing arab kids may not have legs to dance on in a near future, but a similar fate awaits many a Texas redneck volunteer who encounters the reality of combat, away from Duke-Nukem and his playstation.

  33. What?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Linking the cancelation to anything other than sincere concern for air travelers is absurd. You trolls might like to bash Apple for grins, but this kind of trash is almost as bad as some of the racist talk I've been hearing lately.


    I'm sure that many vendors were canceling, and that Apple employees were't too happy about international air travel. In the end this can only be viewed as a prudent move.


    Any of you suggesting otherwise make me sick.

  34. Re:ESR on the WTC Attack by alen · · Score: 1

    I wonder what happens when a firefight breaks out at 30,000 feet? How many bullets would it take to puncture the skin, have the air pressure tear it off and for people to be sucked out? Maybe we should start thinking about installing bulletproof seats on airplanes now?

  35. Apple is a US company by artemis67 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Terrorists might view Apple as a target because of that.

    The WTC didn't house many (if any) government offices, they were businesses.

    Personally, I also think it's a little too reactionary; they should just beef up security and go on with the show.

    There was a report on Marketplace on Friday about how many organizations within the US are cancelling their conventions because of the tragedy. The financial impact on the tourism industry of those cities is in the tens of millions of dollars. Think about it, if a convention has 30,000 people, and each person spends an average of $300 apiece on food, lodging, and such, then the loss of that one convention would mean the loss of $9 mil. in revenue.

    1. Re:Apple is a US company by ComaVN · · Score: 1

      They targeted WTC because it's the biggest and best known thing in the NY area, not because they're interested in the businesses. Why would they go for the Pentagon then? So any attack on europe would involve things like the eiffel tower in Paris or the Canary Wharf building in London, or some other phallus symbol, not some congress center with a bunch of mac lovers.

      --
      Be wary of any facts that confirm your opinion.
    2. Re:Apple is a US company by artemis67 · · Score: 2

      My point was that attacking symbols of America are just as valid, if not more so, to terrorists than attacking the US government or the US military directly. The WTC is a symbol of America. Apple is a symbol of America.

      Read their press release.

    3. Re:Apple is a US company by ComaVN · · Score: 1

      Ow come on, Disney, Coca Cola and MacDonalds are symbols of America (at least for non-americans), not Apple.

      By the way, exactly what of their press release do you think I missed? They don't say anything apart from "We're sorry to disappoint our users and developers, but their safety is our primary concern." Not very specific IMHO.

      --
      Be wary of any facts that confirm your opinion.
    4. Re:Apple is a US company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they hit the WTC primarily because they tried to take it out before and couldn't. And the time before, they selected it primarily to maximize the number of casualties they could get with one bomb. Also, the White House was supposed to be another target, not the Pentagon. From looking at the flight path, it looks like the overshot their first attempt at the White House and then decided to hit the Pentagon because the F-16s were on their way from Dover and they didn't want to risk looping around again. However, that's pure speculation on my part.

      If they hit Europe, I think the likely targets would be centers of government (e.g. Buckingham Palace) or buildings with large numbers of people to maximize casualties. If so, convention centers, stadiums, and arenas could be attractive targets.

    5. Re:Apple is a US company by artemis67 · · Score: 2

      I said the press release, but was thinking of this quote from the internal email. Sorry.

      Also, today we are announcing the cancellation of Apple Expo 2001,
      which was scheduled to take place in Paris on September 26-30. We
      are very sorry to disappoint our customers and developers, but their
      safety must be our primary concern at this time. Apple is a very
      visible American company, and having a highly publicized event at
      this time would be irresponsible.


      Any questions?

    6. Re:Apple is a US company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. The Pentagon was a last-ditch effort to hit a major target. They certainly had no intention of slamming into a building with walls 7 feet thick, which absorbed the worst of the impact.

      Given the timing (hijacked an hour after the other flights), the flight path, etc. they were attempting to hit the White House after the president had returned. They weren't counting on the FAA grounding all flights, thereby making them stand out like a sore non-responding thumb.

      Then, of course, they screwed up and missed the (mostly empty) WH on their first pass (it's quite difficult to piloting a flying freight train), so they chose the easiest target of opportunity.

  36. Apple's Future Existance by TJ_Phazerhacki · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    If apple is canceling a show on such an international basis, this cant be good for their pr. Their new video editing system is easily underpriced and overpowered by the New Sgi's, and (pause for drama) it has a dvd burner? Give me a break. This is just another nail in the coffin.

    --
    Physics is nothing like religion. If it was, we'd have an easier time trying to raise money!
    1. Re:Apple's Future Existance by CottonEyedJoe · · Score: 1

      SGI is doing such great business these days. FYI, Apple has enough cash to buy SGI if they were worth it....they arent. SGI's restructuring and wacko business model have basically doomed it. The intel based series is just more competition for Intergraph....now theres a wildly successful business ;-)

      It absolutely amazes me how someone can talk about nails in Apple's coffin and in the same paragraph reccomend SGI. SGI died when they became SGI (As opposed to Silicon Graphics) They just dont know it yet. Maybe this kind of anti-FUD is enough to raise SGI out of the pink sheets....I doubt it.

      Proud owner of 3 mips based SGI's...and 5 macs.

    2. Re:Apple's Future Existance by mkelley · · Score: 1

      Let us also put this in perspective, Apple secretly funded Be for a few months. If Apple wanted a company like Be instead of SGI, what hope does SGI have?

      No deathnails need to be prepaired, Apple has the same market share as Linux. Death, Taxes and Apple. Always gonna be here. They have gone through a lot worse and they always seem to bounce back.

      --

      m.kelley
      life is like a freeway, if you don't look you could miss it.
    3. Re:Apple's Future Existance by Mononoke · · Score: 1
      Wait, you forgot to call Apple 'beleagered.'

      --
      NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
    4. Re:Apple's Future Existance by frater_b · · Score: 1

      Just another half-wit would-be soothsayer fortelling the demise of Apple!

      You actually have a problem with an affordable video editing system with dvd burning? If you want to shell out the big bucks for an SGI station, go ahead!

      Apple naysayers, like yourself, always find some little nit to pick. "Oh, their hardware is too expensive." Now, you're complaining it's too cheap. Perhaps the only nail being driven into a coffin here is the one that you've hammered in the coffin of English grammar. It's "existence," not "existance"... It sounds like your fiscal abilities are as poor as your English.

  37. Jobs can't be serious by sessamoid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Safety? What big name terrorist is going to hit a computer company convention? Sure they're pretty well known, but hardly a good target for destroying the Western world's economy or confidence. The number of attractive destruction targets that come ahead of Apple Expo number in the thousands. Why, even in Paris, I'd think there are more than a few famous landmarks that would be well publicized if they were to get destroyed. Apple Expo getting bombed would make front page news maybe, and only for one day.

    If anything, we should be promoting these kind of event, not just to show that our lives continue on despite the terrorists attempts to change them, but also to help bolster the airline industry. If things don't pick up quickly, even with the gov't bailout, several of the majors may go down this year.

    --
    "No, no, no. Don't tug on that. You never know what it might be attached to."
    1. Re:Jobs can't be serious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would have to guess it's the mass number of flights involved getting people over to the convention, and not the convention itself, that is the concern.

    2. Re:Jobs can't be serious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i assume the idea is to limit any unnecessary air travel. i doubt they are worried about the conference but rather about travelling to it.

  38. I thought Charles Bukowski was dead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But apparently not.

  39. Non-event cancelled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This conference had very little excitement going for it anyway with a promise from Apple of no new hardware announcements. The centerpiece would have been demos of OSX 10.1 and possibly some third party software announcements. It was really just to wave the Apple flag in Europe. There are very real safety and logistical nightmares in mounting an American corporate expo in Europe right now. Most convention gack goes by air freight which for the last week and probably the next week will be totally snarled and backed up. Nobody knows when U.S. military retaliation will take place, but the first moves could very reasonably take place in the time frame of this expo. To put a high profile American expo up in Europe at that point is to paint a bullseye on it. All in all I'd say from a cost/benefit analysis this is the right decision to make for Apple's best interests.

  40. Re:Dumb move... by F50 · · Score: 1

    That's exactly how I feel. If there was done nothing at the airports I would be afraid, However that's NOT the case.
    ARM was supposed to have a training this week in San Jose, however the same thing happened and the training was canselled...Dumb dumb move.... DUMB!

  41. The O'Reilly P2P Conference also. by wiredog · · Score: 2, Informative

    Info here. It was going to be here in DC next week, and I imagine most of the attendees were flying into National Airport, which is closed indefinitely.

    1. Re:The O'Reilly P2P Conference also. by steve_bryan · · Score: 1

      "It was going to be here in DC next week"

      No, I was going to be flying out tonight. It was starting tomorrow. I doubt that air travel is sufficiently close to normal for most participants to get there. My plan of bringing along my two sons was definitely out and I'm still not sure about the postponed conference.

    2. Re:The O'Reilly P2P Conference also. by AJWM · · Score: 2

      There have been calls to close National Airport since that iced-up 737 crashed into a bridge over the Potomac years ago, probably even before that. It's location is just awful for jet aircraft, which have to fly some pretty bizarre approaches and takeoffs. But it was just too damn convenient for congresscritters wanting to commute home to their constituents.

      They really ought to close it permanently. It's an anachronism. Unfortunately now would be a psychologically bad time to do so.

      --
      -- Alastair
  42. Re:w00ty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    look fore teh foot

  43. Just Stupid ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does he fear anything that extremist will attack his apple :o)

    This is sad news here for europeans MacOS supporters, just because MacOSX 10.1 (which should have been named XI ) gain lots of cool technologies ...

    The best for me ist that it seem to be JNLP compliant :o) Yeah !

    Now, macosX is realy a true Java ready platform and we can develop applications for masses using swing+JNLP ... that's great news.

    Hope that steve will rollback its transaction ;)

    4R34'.

  44. Re:ESR on the WTC Attack by gorgon · · Score: 1
    The story about this took less than five minutes to be rejected by the editors. Apparently when your stock is circling the drain, a member of the Board of Directors saying something like that isn't something you necessarily want publicised.
    Yawn. Get over the conspiracy theories already. Every contoversial thing ESR (or RMS, or Bruce Perens, or Linus) says does not necessarly deserve to be a slashdot article. For articles like that see here. Over 99% of submissions to slashdot are rejected. An article about that quote would be nothing more than flamebait, so why should it be posted?
    --

    And I'd be a Libertarian, if they weren't all a bunch of tax-dodging professional whiners.
    Berke Breathed
  45. I wonder if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...we'll start seeing certain mailing lists that have signatures that read:

    Don't Laugh, I brought apple at $13 a share and now I'm fscked.

    1. Re:I wonder if... by Mononoke · · Score: 1
      Don't Laugh, I brought apple at $13 a share and now I'm fscked.
      Why? While the rest of the markets were down an average of 7%, APPL was down only 2.19%

      (The canceled Expo announcement was out before the markets closed, and had no effect.)

      --
      NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
  46. Mod parent(s) down please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, didn't realise that complaints on Slashdot procedures were supposed to be addressed in the proper meta-discussions. I would appreciate it if moderators could moderate both the parent to this and the parent of that to (-1) so that it does not appear in the archives.

    I wont bother anyone again by interrupting entirely irrelevent threads.

    I humbly and totally apologise to all Slashdotters for this breach of protocol.

  47. Re:Postponing the inevitable by bellings · · Score: 2

    Apple is slowly dying anyway.

    Well, duh! What did they expect when they decided to use BSD?

    --
    Slashdot is jumping the shark. I'm just driving the boat.
  48. AppleInsider was right! by artemis67 · · Score: 2

    They didn't predict anything for MacWorld Paris, and it looks like they were right!!!

    1. Re:AppleInsider was right! by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      bwahahaha!

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  49. Protest over France's 'cool reaction'? by weslocke · · Score: 1

    I imagine it's not, but the first thing that flew into my mind was that this was possibly a 'protest' against France's... umm... how to say it... 'lukewarm support' for American policies in tracking and punishing the terrorists responsible for the WTC attack.

    --

    'Life is like a spoonful of Drain-O, it feels good on the way down but leaves you feeling hollow inside'
    1. Re:Protest over France's 'cool reaction'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the first thing that flew into my mind was that this was possibly a 'protest' against France's... umm... how to say it... 'lukewarm support' for American policies in tracking and punishing the terrorists responsible for the WTC attack.

      Yeah, we need a scapegoat now. Nobody knows at this moment, whether Bin Laden (whose Taliban BTW were once sponsored and armed by the CIA ) is responsible for these attacks. The fire which the US once have nourished to burn others, finally has come home.
    2. Re:Protest over France's 'cool reaction'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what?
      Not everyone has to agree with American policies.
      No one really wants to.
      No one shows blind support for a country headed by some moron cowboy who plans to kill thousands, if not millions of "innocent civilians" in his "search of those who are responsible."

      What a crock of shit.
      Who in their right mind would present the US with a blank cheque saying we will support you whatever you do?

      Do you see ANY country saying they will support US military strikes? (Apart from Australia, but really, Mr John Howard is just sucking up to Bush. And thinks he may get re-elected.)

      Here's a hint. No government apart from the US government actually cares about persuing this "terrorist threat." Sure, they don't want terrorism in their countries, but they're not going to start a war over 5000 dead Americans, for America. They just don't care. What have they got to gain? Life goes on. Many more have died elsewhere. Somehow, the world manages to move on. But if it happens in the US, ... gee, that's a different matter all together.

      I'm sorry to contradict all the media saying these events will change the world forever, and what not. I think they should change that to say "these events will change America." These events havn't changed my world. Infact, apart from watching boring, repetitive news on CNN (Oh, the humanity!), not much has changed for me. Nor for my company. Nor for everyone I know.

      Seems a Americans life is worth more than an Afghans life. Do you think you're more worthy of life?

      All these US companies with their knee-jerk reactions to the WTC collapsing, taking it out of movies, out of games, out of this, out of that. I mean, really, what the hell? I know I won't be unhappy if I see the WTC in some movie. I probably wouldn't even NOTICE the WTC in them.

      You know, the "terrorists" could have done much worse if they really wanted to. But last time I checked, killing massives amounts of people for no reason wasn't on anybodies to-do list. The hijackings weren't really done to kill people. As Mr Bush would describe it, they're the "innocent casualties" in this "attack on America."

      I also wonder, why shit like this didn't happen when Clinton was in office. Don't you?

      Go read 1984.
      Go read counterpunch.org.

  50. no major loss... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...fogs suck anyway and paris is *way* over reaited (primarily by teenage girls who are looking for "romance" after finally getting over their horse fettish).

    besides... they can hold the expo in the good old USA (preferably in New York), where 80% of their customer base lives and works. If the rest of the world want to come take a look, well, great!

  51. Dissapointed in Apple by QuantumFTL · · Score: 1

    Last week during the disaster, hundreds of websites changed their front page to reflect the horrible disaster which occurred. Everything from search engines like google.com to humor sites like keepersoflists.org and even Microsoft.com put something up about the disaster. Apple blatently ignored the issue for several days, and while a tech support individual I spoke with (about an unrelated issue) said they were all stunned by the event, the web site did not reflect this for several days. It made me a little less happy to be a Mac user. (Yes, I use linux/unix every day as well)

    I wish Apple would have been a little cooler about the whole thing. At least they are finally catching up.

    Yuck.

    1. Re:Dissapointed in Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least they took down the news ticker and all unlike Microsoft who profited from their message at the same time with ads.

    2. Re:Dissapointed in Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the following, it seems that Apple and its employees were involved in the relief efforts from the start and have been very sympathetic to the situation...

      - Peabody, MA Apple Retail Store employees donated blood and 12 cases of Evian water to the local blood bank: http://www.macobserver.com/article/2001/09/14.9.sh tml

      - Tampa Apple Retail Store opening scheduled for 09/14 was delayed until Saturday so that its employees and customers could be part of the National day of Prayer

      - Many Apple employees left work early on Tuesday and/or on Friday.

      - Apple Europe employees observed three minutes of silence on Wednesday morning

      The list goes on. Apple offers suggestions on how employees can help the relief efforts on the internal web page. They're holding a blood drive. They have set up counseling for employees.

      The original message was probbaly a troll that I have walked into, but I felt compelled to respond anyway. So I'll go have a nice day now, and I hope you do, too.

    3. Re:Dissapointed in Apple by Teun · · Score: 1
      - Apple Europe employees observed three minutes of silence on Wednesday morning


      And so did another 800 million Europeans, Wow!

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    4. Re:Dissapointed in Apple by Phroggy · · Score: 2

      I don't think "let's write something to put on our web site, and get one of the graphics guys to make a pretty logo with an American flag or something, so everyone on Slashdot will see how much we care" was the first thing that came to their mind. I think they were busy watching CNN. I know I was. When I did go to Apple's Web site, I was very impressed that they had replaced their entire front page.

      Snapshots from around the Web on 9/14/01

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    5. Re:Dissapointed in Apple by QuantumFTL · · Score: 1

      It was not a troll. I am an avid mac user, and I felt :( when I saw that they put no mention on their page for several days. I did *NOT* say the employees did nothing, in fact I talked to one on the phone that said they were all very upset, etc over it.

      I simply stated that they didn't publicly show anything on their web site, but even Microsoft did. It was like... like they were no longer the "cool ones."

      My friends also though tthis was bad.

    6. Re:Dissapointed in Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Several days? Not correct. I have a screen shot dated thursday sept. 13 - about 55 hours after - with a front page totally dedicated to the tragedy in a way I personally find appropriate. And as others have pointed out, then this is not about being politically correct, but acting in a manner that you feel is appropriate.

    7. Re:Dissapointed in Apple by QuantumFTL · · Score: 1

      55 hours is more than 2 days. The web sites I considered "on time" were either same-day, or the next. more than 2 days is like, what the heck is the hold up? I don't really think it took them a lot of time to change that (any half-decent person with photoshop could have made that in less than 15 minutes). I just didn't like the next day, going to their web site, and seeing about how blazing fast the titanium was, when everyone else had already shown their support. I'm not saying what they did was morally wrong, however I was very dissapointed, and also dissapointed in the brevity of what they put up. At least they had a link to the red cross web site.

  52. It's a logistical problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They need to ship all their stuff two weeks in advance from the US to clear customs and be there on time. That would put it right around the bombing incident. They lost an entire week there so they won't have anything except an empty booth there. Air travel is tight and backlogged. Tons and tons of high profile companies are suspending employee travel indefinately (HP for example). Some key employees and vendors may have expressed the desire to stay on the ground. Without Apple's presence, the expo will collapse so it was cancelled.

  53. Careful... by artemis67 · · Score: 3, Funny

    We're already in the midst of one jihad, don't get another one started... :-P

    1. Re:Careful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jobs = Allah in a black turtleneck

  54. RE: SGI by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

    There will likely be alot of disrupted PR events in the coming months, it's not going to just be Apple.

    As for the next killer app/machine coming from SGI...ha. Thier stock is currently trading at 40 cents a share and are about to be delisted from the NASDAQ.

    Apple has shipped many times more machines in the last two years than SGI has, sorry but if anyone is getting a nail in the coffin, it's SGI.

  55. Security concerns? In France?!? by ayden · · Score: 1

    Honestly, you won't be more safe in the US than in the EU. My girlfriend and I both realize this and therefore are NOT canceling our Paris vacation, even though we're flying American Airlines from Boston. As long as they let us get on the plane on the 27th, we're going.

    --
    "I'm The Bounty Bear. I will find him anywhere. I'm searching."
  56. logistics by rob+colonna · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As one of the Anonymous masses mentioned above, this is not merely an issue of fearing potential attack upon the expo itself. Each of these expos has 100+ exhibitors, all of whom need goods transported, on time, safely, and, worse, in this case, across international borders. This may be now, and for the next few weeks both more difficult, and probably more expensive.
    Many companies nation, and even world-wide have issued directives stating that 'no one will be forced to fly'. Can you blame them for cancelling an event that may have been plagued by the resultant no-shows of the exhibitors? Business-wise it makes sense, and then, given that they are a prominent American corporation, the over-arching safety concern makes it a very sound decision indeed.

  57. Pretty sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure what is worse... people bashing Apple in the wake of the WTC incident or people moderating up those posts.

  58. Can we all evolve already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is it their are always a bunch of people on these and other sites that have beat up on each other over which OS or Company is the best, coolest, dying, etc.

    If you want to use Mac OS X, Mac OS, Windows, Dos, BeOS, BSD, Linux, Solaris or whatever is you preferred choice then do it. But in the end people using one OS and pissing all over other peoples choices tends to hint at some insecurity with their choice. People tend to tear down the things that threaten them.

    Can't people move along and just us their preferred "tools" to accomplish whatever they are trying to do and not pick everything around them to pieces.

    I have used Irix, Mac OS, Mac OS X, BeOS, OS2, Windows, Dos and each has their benefits and drawback as far as accomplishing tasks I was trying to perform. Their is plenty of room for each OS in the world of technology.

    Apple has every right in the wake of the events this last week to no put at risk the city, people and their own employees by staging a large gathering in a foreign country. This is not to mention the logistical nightmare that will ensue trying to ship all the equipment, materials and people through security and customs when the transportation system is being turned upside down to prevent further tragedies.

    So to those people that insist on pouncing on any news to promote their reasons for why their choice is a better on, go get a life and leave other people alone. It is fine to point out technical merits or things that one system can accomplish that another can't.

    There are more important things to do then troll around predicting the fall of any company producing products that you do not like, or the foolishness of someone for using those products.

  59. Bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jobs will try to take the credit for holding the show at your igloo by renaming your house the i-gloo (pronounced eye-glue) and pour fruity-looking food coloring all over it.

  60. redhat techworld brussels also cancelled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    redhat techworld brussels was also
    called off ... but for financial
    reasons.

    I suspect Apple's reasons are more
    financial than safety related.

  61. Oh no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The ten people who were originally going to attend have now cancelled.

  62. Re: Low-level specs for "dead" Apple tech by jswitte · · Score: 1

    I agree with you about info on older systems. I'm sort of part of the dwindling community of Newton users (sort of because I used to use it quite a bit, but haven't touched it in the past few months), and low-level/never-released info on it could potentially REALLY be useful.

    Sean Luke has succesfuly ported the Waba JVM to the Newton, and low-level info on how to access the QuickDraw routines in the Newton ROM would really speed up the graphics. It's been done (Fractor, by Jason Rukman - you don't happen to know him?), but I can't find him.. Diddo for how to access the inker directly. And for info on how to make an OSX app to connect to the internal Dock application, or having the source to the NewtonScript byte-code compiler to make a replacement for NTK. Heck, the whole darn source code for the OS would be nice to look at, as I'd think that there's nothing of particularly "strategic value" in there (except for legacy SE QuickDraw routines, which are just that - legacy) On a more ambitious note, info on the hardware specs would be useful, especially with regards to replacing the display, or perhaps putting in a larger one.

    I ran across a post somewhere talking about the mounds and mounds of neat techology that Apple is just sitting on - QuickDraw GX, PowerTalk, KeyChain (off the table now, as it's in the OS), QuickDraw 3D (mostly supplanted by Quesa, but they still have some neat 3D-user-interface ideas for a mythical "Quickdraw 3D 2.0") and saying that Apple should release these gems as open-source. Put a moderatly restrictive licensing agreement on it saying that it can't be used in commercial software without written authorization from Apple (but that would invole $$$ on Apple's part to process requests, and you'd have to hire an army of lawyers to go after M$ if they tried to steal it.)

    Hmm, any posibility of forming a "Coalition to Free Apple Technology" ("Apple Toys want to be free..."), and the prayer of getting an ear on the board of directors?

    Miffed,
    Jim Witte
    jswitte@bloomington.in.us

  63. Re:Postponing the inevitable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yo PHB, you guys have been saying this since about 1996 "Apple will be gone in a year". Funny they are still here, eh?

  64. FUD!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dying slowly???? PUHLEEZ, Apple has been dying slowly since 1976 if you believe the pundits. YOU are a fudster of the lamest sort, and Apple happens to have a great balance sheet and BILLIONS of dollars in cash reserves that are NOT dissipating. Now, crawl back in your cave, moron.

  65. Re:Dumb move... by bradleyjay · · Score: 0

    Take away the bowie knives, and they can use their own bodies (hand to hand combat / martial arts). What's next? No arms / legs on aircraft? Only parapalegics will be able to fly?

    Why don't we just accept the fact that no amount of restrictions on what you can bring on an aircraft will stop those who are determined enough. For a change, why don't we try not to piss off as many nations as we can...then maybe so many won't WANT to do this...just a thought.

    Mod me down if you want, I don't care anymore.

    --
    Karma...what's that? I just speak my mind.
  66. Re:Brilliant Reasoning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    migawd, you ARE the scum... you have no shame... it must really suck to be you.

  67. Give me a break! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    jesus christ man, just because they dont change their website, they are bad guys now. forget that. this whole thing is horrible, and it gets me choked up without a doubt, but im not checking websites making sure they are showing their support, cause i dont really care. im giving my support, if others are going to and whatever way they want to show that support is all their business. so damn you for criticizing apple about that.

    i swear, i go to small pointless little websites and even THEY are talking about how they are showing their support, give me a break. two teenagers in their basement are telling me about their support. its rediculous.

    and why does it matter that it took apple an extra day or an extra 12 hours to change their home page. you do realize its a pretty big descision right? like im sure the board got together and discussed how they wanted to handle it.

    so in the future go fuck yourself

  68. disagree by ragnar · · Score: 2

    I'm not sure where you get that impression? One of the first world leaders to speak out in support of the United States was the French Prime Minister.

    I would confidently say that Apple had no political angle on this. I would suspect that Apple is primarily concerned about the logistics of people travelling all over the world to attend the conference. In addition, a sparcely attended event would only further aggrivate economic troubles that Apple will be facing from this tragedy. Like it or not, the terrorism has taken the wind out our sails for a little bit. I'm sure we will all get along with life once a critical mass of society feels normal again. That time hasn't been reached yet.

    --
    -- Solaris Central - http://w
    1. Re:disagree by weslocke · · Score: 1

      Agreed that's not the reason for it... just that it's what flew into my mind at first. And as for what I was talking about here you go. (I imagine this will get modded down as 'Offtopic,' even though it demonstrates what I was talking about.)

      France calls for American 'reason'

      By Harry de Quetteville in Paris and Toby Helm in Berlin
      (Filed: 14/09/2001)

      POLITICAL leaders in France and Germany urged President Bush yesterday to avoid a belligerent response, as fears grew in Europe of the consequences of swift and ruthless military reaction to the terrorist attacks.

      Lionel Jospin, the French Prime Minister, said the Americans should be "reasonable" in their response. Alain Richard, his defence minister, said the attacks were "not acts of war".

      M Jospin said: "We must vigorously condemn and combat terrorism. But we must not allow ourselves to be led into considerations of a conflict between the western world and the Islamic world, where we have many friends and partners."

      The remarks from the Socialist prime minister were aimed at reassuring both the France's political Left and its Muslim population, which numbers six million. But they will be seen as further evidence of disagreements between France and America on big foreign policy issues.

      The comments by M Richard will also undermine American confidence in France's commitment to joint reprisals as outlined by Nato members on Wednesday. He said: "I think that this was a terrorist attack of particular gravity.

      "American democracy is clearly endangered by such action, but in my opinion a war is something else entirely." France disagrees with US policy on missile defence, the bombing of Iraq and what it sees as American cultural imperialism.

      France's maverick health minister, Bernard Kouchner, went as far yesterday as to put the attacks down to a "series of errors" by America. "America's made a real mistake in Afghanistan and Pakistan, which was to train the Taliban," M Kouchner said.

      "To think now that there is some kind of consensus of 'honourable' nations against the 'bad' terrorists, is simply not true."

      --

      'Life is like a spoonful of Drain-O, it feels good on the way down but leaves you feeling hollow inside'
  69. Re:Smart move.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, if he's in France that's probably what he is looking for.

  70. 5000 dead, only about 250 would buy a mac by Genoaschild · · Score: 0

    You only loss about 250 customers(5% of 5000). Stop belly aching. People aren't going to stop buying Macintoshes because an Islamic Fanatic decides to aim a plane into the world trade center. The Mac community is too tight to let that happen.

    --
    Just because a bunch of people believe or do something stupid, doesn't make it any less stupid.
    1. Re:5000 dead, only about 250 would buy a mac by XPulga · · Score: 0
      It was meant to be a funny joke. In fact, many Macs must have been destroyed in the attack, and since the companies remain "alive", it is probable that they will buy new computers of similar shape and form of those destroyed (with money from the insurance, of course).

      And most likely, those 5000 people weren't decision makers who chose whether the box on their desk would be a PC, Mac, Sparc, whatever.

  71. Re:Security concerns? In France?!? by Smoking · · Score: 1

    France has just reactivated it's anti-terrorist plan (called vigipirate).

    It means: military people under the Eiffel tower. Every trash can in Paris is removed (it's not a joke...) and Jets with missiles at 10min of flight from Paris.
    So France should be about as secure as the US...

    Quentin

  72. Re:Dumb move... by cmeans · · Score: 1
    Please educate me, why exactly is the parent message (to this one) a Troll?

    Thanks.

  73. It's happened before.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe it was in Greece several years back.. some terrorists blew up a computer store selling Apple hardware because it was an easy to recognize American company.

  74. thx guys, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was using the "nudge, nudge" sketch to parody the "yeah, but does it run linux" losers. Ok, I guess it was kinda weak. But thanks for drowning it out with a bunch on irrellevant MP sketches.

    If you meant to do that, kudos, your strategy worked well.
    If you didn't, then you're both a pair of bonehead geeks that didn't get the point of the original post. Not that that would be uncommon around here.

  75. Re: Low-level specs for "dead" Apple tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would absolutely love to know the details of the Dock interface in OS X, for then I could write an X extension to allow X window managers to iconify to the Dock. However, I think Apple is trying to avoid having 3rd parties write all sorts of oddball Dock customizations, which I can sort of understand. I can't think of any reason not to release specs on legacy products though.

  76. Re:Dumb move... by Niksie3 · · Score: 1

    apple??!?!?!?!? financial trouble??? Apple happends to be the only computer company who is still profitting. and they have a LOT of cash availible. they are giving away a lot of money to the victems(1 ibook for fammillies with children and one million dollars to the famillies of rescue workers).

    --
    Sig you!
  77. More emphasis on Seybold? by d80god · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this means that any other announcements (MacOS 10.1 intro) that were slated for AppleExpo will be held at Seybold in SF instead. It's also possible that they may have a special coming out party, like they did for the original iMac.

    --
    --------------------- Eddie Liu.
    1. Re:More emphasis on Seybold? by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Mac OS 10.1 should be released independently of expos and conferences and such; it will be released when it's ready. Should be within about two weeks.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  78. Hoorah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yay! Another sign that Apple Computer is dying!

  79. Re: Low-level specs for "dead" Apple tech by frankie · · Score: 2

    I can't think of any reason not to release specs on legacy products though.

    One easy reason: Apple makes most of its money on hardware sales. They don't want you to keep your old stuff running; they want you to replace it with a new Mac instead.

    It would be nice if they released all of their discarded software as public source, but hiring someone to sort through the old code files and tech notes costs money that a tech biz is hard to afford in these lean times. Maybe someone could convince Jordan Hubbard to let them do it as a volunteer?

  80. the answer is here : Mod this up by dopolon · · Score: 1

    this is the most likely explanation.
    Many major events are canceled because of this very tight security measures.

    --
    "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
  81. Apple in the toilet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My brother works at ppl and he said that morale is very low there; Apple is slowly dying anyway. One of his co-workers hinted that the real rason why they canceled the expo is because they had distributed only a handful of visitor passes and very few vendors were willing to pay for booth space in these tough economic times, given Apple's limited market share - and several had pulled out at the last minute. With PC manufacturers showing heavy losses and consolidating for survival, it's no surprise that hardware vendors are leery of spending so much money to support a niche product.

    1. Re:Apple in the toilet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ONLY thing in the toilet is YOU, you steaming lump of shit... dying slowly???? The pundits have been sayng this for years and YOU are a fudster of the lamest sort. Apple happens to have a great balance sheet and BILLIONS of dollars in cash reserves that are NOT dissipating. Now, crawl back in your cave, moron.

    2. Re:Apple in the toilet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple is ded, Jim. It's dad.

  82. also add... by profeti · · Score: 1

    the fact that Prince Alwaleed (of Saudi royal family) has over $300m invested in apple.

  83. Trade show industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The trade show industry took a big hit. Many shows where cancelled. I work for an online event housing firm. The vast majority of the shows cancelled because of the airline situation.

    All the exhibitors for the apple show, not all of them work for apple directly, would have to get from the states to Europe, which would have been impossible.

  84. a JOKE?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You ARE a sick fucking puke.

  85. Re:Postponing the inevitable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My guess is that Apple will be dead in another 2 or 3 years. It is hurting bad now, with fewer and fewer interested in its over-priced proprietary offerings. No great loss, IMHO.

  86. Re:ESR on the WTC Attack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It could take anywhere from one bullet to several dozen to cause the problems you are writing about. It's all about where it hits, how it hits, etc. The walls on an aircraft are actually pretty thin but they are securely fastened with many wields and rivets. Most likely a bullet would create a small hole which would cause loss of cabin pressure and not much else.

    However, there is a very small chance of a gun actually getting on a flight. Despite the problems that airport security gave they still do a very good job at screening out explosives and guns. They have a long way to go with items such as poisonous gases, ceramic knives, bludgeoning instruments, etc. Basically if it's not made of metal they have a tough time detecting it if it's been decently disguised.

    - Graff

  87. air is not the only consideration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just because past attacks have all been by air, doesn't mean future ones will be

    it's easy to point the finger, but if it had gone ahead and people had died, I'm sure you'd be pointing the finger as well, saying it should have been cancelled

  88. I really don't follow this... by catseye_95051 · · Score: 2

    US Airliners are safer now then they have been in a long time thanks to beefed up US airport security. Noone has even made a peep that I've heard of a threatening move towards france.

    This is the wierdest PR excuse for a chnage of direction I've ever heard. Can ANYONE make sense of it for me??

    Frankly the US Airliens need the business, if Apple really was concerned with the fall out from this attack I'd thnk they'd want to help promote intercontinental flight...

    1. Re:I really don't follow this... by yuriwho · · Score: 2

      Pretty Simple really. Steve did not want the true OS X comming out party to be a flop. He did not want it remembered for being insensitive to the crisis at hand. He would rather quietly release 10.1 in the specified time frame (Seybold) and let the passion of the Mac Faithful and new adoptees, with their newly aroused patriotism, be the show.

      I think it is a good call.

      --
      no sig.
  89. security and organisation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    security is a legitimate concern, but as well as that is attendance, materials and transport.

    I'm not in the US, and the company I work for is having an expo. We've just about had to cancel it, sponsors have dropped out, materials we needed won't be here by the time we need them and people won't be travelling to be there

  90. True Colors, Shining Through by KingJawa · · Score: 1

    Why is it, that when Apple donates $1m and probably another $1m in computers, /. cheers, but when MS gives away $5m and another $5m in software, they boo?

    Good for Apple.

    Good for MS.

    Bad for /.

    1. Re:True Colors, Shining Through by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      probably because Apple does it quietly - without even mentioning it on their web site - which shows that it's sincere and from the heart

  91. Oh, cut it out... by PhReaKyDMoNKeY · · Score: 1

    I see one rather large thinking fallacy recurring in many replies here. Too many people are trying to psychoanalyze the terrorists and whether or not an Apple convention would be a target. However, this line of thought requires one basic assumption that is just downright wrong: the terrorists, whoever they might be, are not necessarily going to act logically. If they were that rational, they wouldn't have made such a futile and (likely) ultimately self-defeating move as to piss off the United States. Sure, an Apple convention might not be high on the laundry list of targets, but that might be what makes it so attractive: nobody would expect it. Anyway, bugger all. It doesn't particularly matter.

    1. Re:Oh, cut it out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The rational thing for them to do would be to appear to be irrational.

  92. Yeah, that and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And that giving out Microsoft products can't be seen as helping anyone!

    1. Re:Yeah, that and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yea that ibook sure helps tho. im sure the red cross is short on doorstops and paperweights.

  93. Re: Troll! by kiwipeso · · Score: 0

    BSD is a great unix.

    --
    - Kaos games and encryption systems developer
  94. Apple is dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amiga, Apple, Atari, BSD, BeOS -- all dead or dying. Deal with it. Move on.

  95. If they are going to cut jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why don't they start by cutting Jobs rathering than cutting jobs. Cutting Jobs should be the first consideration before looking at cutting jobs after all they will save millions by cutting Jobs rather than cutting jobs.

  96. Terrorists winning ... by tubs · · Score: 1
    Doesn't these sort of cancellations show that the terrorists are winning.

    Surely the best thing to do would have been to carry on and show the murders that you are not afraid of them, that they won't disrupt your life, that things *will* carry on?

    --

    try to make ends meet, you're a slave to money, then you die

    1. Re:Terrorists winning ... by tfrayner · · Score: 1

      I thoroughly agree. The terrorists must be loving this...

      --
      The best newspaper in the USA: the Anderson Valley Advertiser.
    2. Re:Terrorists winning ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the terrorists have already won. americans are giving up our liberties in record numbers. not only that, but it would be just as easy to attack the US as it was tuesday.

      ahh what people are willing to put up with for an illusion of safety

  97. Excerpt from appleturns.com by JohnKFisher · · Score: 1
    From monday's issue of As the Apple Turns:

    First, there's the face-value geopolitical take on things. Provided you can get past the standard "if we let them interrupt business as usual, then the terrorists win" rhetoric, you shouldn't be surprised if Steve is primarily concerned for the safety of the conferencegoers-- not to mention his own skin. Granted, last week's attack was on U.S. soil, not in Paris, but in light of brewing military retaliation, we wouldn't be a bit surprised if our government has told Apple that Paris might not be the safest place for a large and highly-visible American corporation to be next week. If the U.S. decides to flex its military muscles and innocent people therefore turn into "collateral damage," then a U.S. corporation abroad might suddenly find itself dangerously unpopular. Heck, maybe the French government even suggested that the show be cancelled, fearing trouble following a U.S. company onto foreign soil. Who knows? This is all just speculation, and all we can say for certain is that if Apple didn't have safety concerns, it would need to lay of the Reality Distortion just a little.

    Then there's the logistical interpretation. Face it: air travel is a big stinking mess right now, and it's not likely to be much better next week. Steve may have his own jet, but we're guessing it won't seat a full conference staff, and traveling by commercial airline next week will be sketchy at best. And besides moving people, what about moving freight? From last Tuesday until this morning, your best bet for getting things from Point A to Point B was a wormhole in the space-time continuum or by strapping them to your back and walking. Even now, getting them there by air is still a little iffy-- better than last week, and better still next week, but iffy nonetheless. It's entirely likely that Apple just wanted to avoid the higgledy-piggledy altogether.

    --

    John Kenneth Fisher
    Table of malContents
  98. Then don't... by Davoid · · Score: 1

    If you go over to http://www.ntsb.gov and look at a few reports (as I did)... you may notice that there were some 42,000 fatal traffic accidents in 1999. There were 12 fatal air travel accidents in 1999, 1 in 1998 and a high point of 526 fatalities in 1985.

    Doing the math (sorry punch in your own numbers) and even if you narrow the window to, say, 7AM EST to 11AM EST on September 11, 2001... it was still far safer to travel by air than to travel by car. Remember to correct for miles covered in trip.

    --
    "Don't sweat the technique."
    1. Re:Then don't... by macdaddy · · Score: 2

      That's right. The numbers prove that it's safer. Doesn't mean that people will believe it though. Air travel accidents get promoted by the media to an extreme point. People typically believe what the media tells them. If they tell them that violence in schools is increasing, they'll believe them even though the numbers prove that to be an absolute crock of shit--it's been decreasing for decades. A car wreck on the news is nothing; people don't even bat an eye. A plane crash is big news; people sit up and take notice then. Yes, air travel is safer in reality. It's not safer in the minds of the majority people though.

  99. Kitten in the mini-blinds by Graymalkin · · Score: 2

    Let's say you're a billion dollar corporation who's just seen a huge tragedy happen in your home country possibly with several employees directly related to people involved in the tragedy. Are you going to force them to hope on a plane to some expo? Besides that, are you going to ask a bunch of other corporations to do the exact same thing? You won't be a billion dollar corporation for long with that sort of insensitive bullshit happening. It's also pretty ludicrous to try to hae a big international expo at the same time as a major downsizing in the worldwide travel market.

    --
    I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
  100. There's also a humanitarian side to this. by Shadowmist · · Score: 1

    The stoppage of airline flights produced a tremendous backlog in essential flights, including medical-related ones. Organs that had deadlines had to be rerouted to lower-priority patients to avoid wasting them altogether.

    There was a call for Americans to volounteer by giving up nonessential plane reservations. Jobs may or may have not had this in mind, but the Expo cancellation will help with this.

  101. Re:Dumb move... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Apple happends to be the only computer company who is still profitting. and they have a LOT of cash availible"

    doesnt it disturb you that the company is doing so well, yet they still charge insane prices for their hardware?

    real nice of them to pass the savings on to the users like that.

  102. parent post is better than modded... by 3am · · Score: 1

    not a 5, but worth reading. and 'offtopic' just barely applies... think before you mod down...

    --

    A: None. The Universe spins the bulb, and the Zen master merely stays out of the way.
  103. It's not the $ but the % that counts. by pherris · · Score: 1
    Maybe because Jobs is a nicer person (just kidding). Compare the contributions to their most recent quarterly income earnings:

    Cash Donation / Earnings = Percent of Earnings Donated
    Apple: $1M / $67M = 1.5%
    Microsoft: $5M / $7720M = .065%

    If Microsoft wanted to match Apple's donation (percentage wise) they would have to donate $115.8M and not just $5M.

    IMO Apple also wins on the other donations since they're donating equipment (with a very low profit margin and high cost per unit) as compared to M$'s donation of software only (with an extremely high profit margin). The end cost will most likely be more for Apple.

    Also consider this: This horrific act [of the WTC bombing] is a big windfall for M$. How many copies of Windows XP and Server 2k will they sell because of this attack? Alot more than $10M worth. Their per share price is up almost 3% today (18-09-01) while the market as a whole tanks. Out of respect to those that lost there lives I will not make a joke about this.

    If it sounds like I hate M$ it's because I do. Their software sucks for what you pay for it and Gates is just plain evil.

    Also both pale in comparison to the average "Joe Six Pack" who has been giving a higher percent of his income than either. Companies should not operate for the sole benefit of it's investors but also (and equally) to the benefit of their communities. In reality just about every for profit corporation fails miserably at this.

    pherris

    Income info from:
    Microsoft (http://biz.yahoo.com/p/m/msft.html)
    Apple (http://biz.yahoo.com/p/a/aapl.html)

    --
    "And a voice was screaming: 'Holy Jesus! What are these goddamn animals?'" - HST
    1. Re:It's not the $ but the % that counts. by Paranomos · · Score: 1

      It boggles my mind that people can still refer to Bill Gates as "plain evil" when we have seen so recently what plain evil really is.