Debase III had a "gui" that generated the commands at the bottom of the screen as you picked from the menus. You could also type into the command line. I learned a lot by watching the commands being formed as I made selections from the menu. As I learned I started typing more and more of the commands myself.
This might be a good way to introduce the GUI users to CLI by letting them see the relationship between the commands and the actions. Once they have seen how simple the command line is they may not feel as intimidated.
I seem to remember a short science fiction story where congress debated if new product of this type should be allowed on the market. The problem was that the new product was not beef but long pig (human).
Strong manager that shields the support people form politics of the office and form the presser of unreasonable customers. This is the only way to keep good support people and have them be effective. If sales or the customers are pushing them around they can't be the experts they need to be.
Support from engendering when there are is a real question about how something really works.
Fixes and improvements, if what support find as bugs or needed improvements makes it into the product quickly support people will work very hard to find and suggest fixes and improvements. If they (support) is ignored then moral will suffer and you will not keep support people.
Never ask a support person to lie!
Clear policies on what is and is not supported. If you have time to exceed the policies on a case by case bases you can.
Simple tracking tools. I have been far happier with lotus notes with just a touch of custom code than I have been with any of the "big" CRM programs. I am not saying lotus is good it just that it not overly structured. In fact in a lot of cases a directory full of text files would work better than some of CRM stuff I have had to work with.
Team work and knowing what is going on with the customers, the products, and the other members of the support team. A big white board tracking open problems is a big help. Support problems often come in groups. (not always for a reason). but in groups. knowing what other members of the team have or are doing can provide guidance or warning or what is to going on.
Work with the hot air. Remove hot air from the top using holes and/or fans. You might want to put the fans in a separate box sound proof or outside the room with a hose to the enclosure. Have vents a the bottom also maybe with filters to keep the dust out. Remember to make sure there is are flow from shelf to shelf.
This page contains commonly asked questions we hear about FedScope and their answers. Please read this page before you contact us or post in the user forums for assistance. Nothing is more annoying than answering the same question countless times.
Q: How much does FedScope cost? A: FedScope made available to you free of charge and any further development is supported only by donations. To make a donation, click here.
Q: Can I use FedScope as a plug-in in my own program? A: Yes, as long as you leave some credit to us in the code.
Q: Can I sell FedScope? A: Yes, although as we offer it for free, you probably won't be successful at all. You can sell the script as long as you leave some credit to us in the code.
Q: How did you come up with idea for FedScope? A: This is a good question. I have always wanted to have a method for gathering information on specifically what federal agencies visit my websites, when they visit and how often they visit. I decided to allow others to benefit from the software program that I had asked the folks at Vereor to create for this purpose. And thus FedScope was born.
Q: Who actually wrote FedScope? A: FedScope and this website were designed and created by Nick Mahon at Vereor Studios.
Q: Will you ever release a new version of FedScope? A: Depends. If we receive lots of great suggestions for improvements, and if you donate to our development team, we will be able to make the additions you want.
This page contains commonly asked questions we hear about FedScope and their answers. Please read this page before you contact us or post in the user forums for assistance. Nothing is more annoying than answering the same question countless times.
Q: How much does FedScope cost? A: FedScope made available to you free of charge and any further development is supported only by donations. To make a donation, click here.
Q: Can I use FedScope as a plug-in in my own program? A: No. You may only use FedScope in your website and must not make it part of any other program without written permission of the authors to do so.
Q: Can I sell FedScope? A: No. If we catch you selling FedScope you can rest assured you will be hauled into a court of law to answer for copyright infringement. We, the authors of FedScope, choose to make the program available to the masses without charge or obligation. You are not permitted to sell this program, nor are you permitted to include it in any compilation of software that will be sold for any amount.
Q: How did you come up with idea for FedScope? A: This is a good question. I have always wanted to have a method for gathering information on specifically what federal agencies visit my websites, when they visit and how often they visit. I decided to allow others to benefit from the software program that I had asked the folks at Vereor to create for this purpose. And thus FedScope was born.
Q: Who actually wrote FedScope? A: FedScope and this website were designed and created by Nick Mahon at Vereor Studios.
Q: Will you ever release a new version of FedScope? A: Depends. If we receive lots of great suggestions for improvements, and if you donate to our development team, we will be able to make the additions you want.
This would also have the advantage that is someone deleted even part of a file the could even get that back later. Make nightly (incremental) backups on a 14 day rotation. Putting them on a large file storage system.
Than create some perl scripts to retrieve the files when someone wants to.
Could Trademark be used to protect the character? This would not protect the stories/product but would limit someone from using conducting there business using the characters? Or maybe there needs to be some other type of IP protections that protects characters from being taken while letting copyright go back to its correct length.
I for one am not liking with these ideas. Culture is built on myths and stories. If you can bottle and control the stories you can control the culture.
He is helping the children by helping to build a stronger information commons. It is from that Info Commons that the real developments that will make life better come from.
Much of the ware on the power train comes during and because of startup. I would like the car to start pumping oil and coolant before the engine is started. I would also like a forced warmup.
You would press start and the oil pump would start as well as other subsystems. When the oil and coolant are moving and in place (as well as worm if you live in a cold climate and have oil and coolant heaters) then the engine would start. Once the engine was wormed up you would then be cleared to drive.
THIS COULD BE OVERRIDDEN for an emergency start button in the glove box.
This would increase the lifespan of the car's engine and could be extended to things like setting up the radio, mirrors, seat and other comfort and safety items as well.
I would think the adds would be stripped at the sending/server end. The client should not have to do eanything but convert digits to audio. If they are depending to the client to strip the adds then they are sending them out over the internet even if it is not played at the far end.
Though a bit out a tangent there more to service than signal. Check out how the banks and airlines are doing also. We will be doing a detailed study of wireless soon.
http://performance.empirix.com/voiceindex/wirele ss _voice_perf_a.asp
This stuff may help keep the salt and water out of the contacts. There web page is a bit retro, but the stuff seems to work on all the connections I have tried it on.
I have one (have not been using it for a few years) but it works and works well. Be careful no to rest the cord end on the table it over stresses the cord. You can learn it in about a weekend, proficiency comes a little slower about 2 weeks.
I hacked the Linux driver code to make mine act more like a joystick. The ability to preprogram words and things is a big help.
Using proprietary software even if it is free, "Free" or what ever still leaves you dependent.
Oh pllllllluuuueeeessseee. Your killing me. What company really has the required skill set to take a OSS project and alter it to their own needs? id say relativly few.
But that true of most proprietary packages as well. A lack of local venders makes this an even bigger problem. At least with Free Software a host of local businesses can be grown to service these needs. In fact this would be a good place for the government to invest as a way to start a local economy in software services.
So they are still tied in to that proprietary system. Only now they are at the whim of a few hundred thousand coders who seem to change stuff in OSS projects at a whim (the linux 2.4 VM change...).
That was bad and it should not have been done the way it was. But I will except the point. Even then there were alternatives like the -ac line.
Something gets changed, and you can do 1 of 2 things:
1. Stick where they are and live with the older version 2. upgrade to the latest version Kinda the same situation now isnt it?
This is also true. but because Free Software tends to stick to well documented open standards it is less likely the new version will be a must upgrade. If you do need to upgrade you have more choices in how you do it. If version lock or conflict does happen. Setting up an both does not present as large a problem.
only now the economy suffers as no one is buying software.
But lots more people will be buying software services from local vendors. This means the growth of a local industry. There are also national security advantages and economic advantages to not being dependant on far away places for your tools. There are social advantages in that local people can find jobs near there families.
I can really think of only one tool that can get into a corporate arena with any force, and thats openoffice. other tools jsut seem kinda amaturish.
I think this is a weak argument. The hammer and the screwdriver have not changed much since there invention. (at least in the modern age). With tools that can do the job, why even get on the upgrade rat race.
Dont get me wrong, i like OSS, jsut dont say "oooh piracy is advocated in the OSS arena" which is essentially waht u are saying.
No I am not saying that at all. I am saying that making yourself (an individual or as a nation) dependent of someone else puts you at a state of lesser control.
There is a big difference between being interdependent and being completely dependent. Yes you will be interdependent but you will still have control over the software you have and can create more. You can use your resources to push projects in the direction you want them to go.
Unlicensed copying is not a problem in the Free Software world. There is no "piracy". In fact most Free Software Advocates are against unlicensed copying, it weakens the protections that protect Free Software, it removes some of the advantages, and it is constancy used as a stick to beet Free Software by calming the at Free Software does Advocate "Piracy"
Using proprietary software even if it is free, "Free" or what ever still leaves you dependent.
The only road that is going to help in the long run is to build up the real skills a country is going to need is to go with Free Software. We have been over all the arguments before. It always comes down to who will be in control of the tools. If you are in control of the tools than you have the power reach your goals, if someone else has the tools then it is them that will reach their dreams and you might get the crumbs off the table if you are have dreams that fit their needs.
I just spent 4 hours makeing armor adjustmers on a friends suit so we can go to practice tomorrow. I can say with some confedenect that there is a lot more to sword fighting than swinging a stick. I would incorage anyone that wants to learn to take a class or find there local fencing club or find there local SCA practice. There is something to be saI just spent 4 hours making armor adjusters on a friends suit so we can go to practice tomorrow. I can say that there is a lot more to sword fighting than swinging a stick. I would encourage anyone that wants to learn to take a class, find there local fencing club, or find there local SCA practice. There is so much more when you do it for real, I jest don't think there will ever be enough polygons.
Charles Puffer know in the SCA as Lord Duncan Forbes Squire to his Grace Brion Tarragon
Ping the server before attemting to get higher level services.:) This can done useing the public switched telephony network or by sending a single client to the server to verify its service status.
Most Meatspace servers will also provide a prodiction of when services will be avalable in the future.
A low serial number, special case, or cover at a premium price. I would consider paying more to have an early one and to help lower the price. The extra cash could go to lowering the price in the Indian market, and by getting the early runs out of the way the price could also drop. Also experienced Linux users could be more helpful in the programming debug process.
I would rather have a network (blue tooth) or something like that that could keep my personal devices (as will as information on my laptop and desktop) synced. I want the phone lists the same and be able to pull a number form an email on my pda and dial it on the phone. It would also be nice if they backed each other up. So if my cell-phone gets smashed I can buy a replacement and the data will fill in from my other devices. (like a RAD array).
Slashdot Mirror
Debase III had a "gui" that generated the commands at the bottom of the screen as you picked from the menus. You could also type into the command line. I learned a lot by watching the commands being formed as I made selections from the menu. As I learned I started typing more and more of the commands myself.
This might be a good way to introduce the GUI users to CLI by letting them see the relationship between the commands and the actions. Once they have seen how simple the command line is they may not feel as intimidated.
Charles Puffer
I seem to remember a short science fiction story where congress debated if new product of this type should be allowed on the market. The problem was that the new product was not beef but long pig (human).
what els canyou say.
Ok;
Strong manager that shields the support people form politics of the office and form the presser of unreasonable customers. This is the only way to keep good support people and have them be effective. If sales or the customers are pushing them around they can't be the experts they need to be.
Support from engendering when there are is a real question about how something really works.
Fixes and improvements, if what support find as bugs or needed improvements makes it into the product quickly support people will work very hard to find and suggest fixes and improvements. If they (support) is ignored then moral will suffer and you will not keep support people.
Never ask a support person to lie!
Clear policies on what is and is not supported. If you have time to exceed the policies on a case by case bases you can.
Simple tracking tools. I have been far happier with lotus notes with just a touch of custom code than I have been with any of the "big" CRM programs. I am not saying lotus is good it just that it not overly structured. In fact in a lot of cases a directory full of text files would work better than some of CRM stuff I have had to work with.
Team work and knowing what is going on with the customers, the products, and the other members of the support team. A big white board tracking open problems is a big help. Support problems often come in groups. (not always for a reason). but in groups. knowing what other members of the team have or are doing can provide guidance or warning or what is to going on.
Charles Puffer
Since you don't describe the system under test or the type of traffic it is going to receive I will keep my suggestions general.
p irix/Contact+Center+Solu tions/Contact+Center+Solutions+Overview.html?page= home_page&link=ccs_mainlink
Try:
Testing Computer Telephony Systems and Networks
Steve Gladstone
ISBN 0-936648-82-1
Or:
www.empirix.com
http://www.empirix.com/Em
Discloser:
Yes I work for Empirix.
Work with the hot air. Remove hot air from the top using holes and/or fans. You might want to put the fans in a separate box sound proof or outside the room with a hose to the enclosure. Have vents a the bottom also maybe with filters to keep the dust out. Remember to make sure there is are flow from shelf to shelf.
This page contains commonly asked questions we hear about FedScope and their answers. Please read this page before you contact us or post in the user forums for assistance. Nothing is more annoying than answering the same question countless times.
Q: How much does FedScope cost?
A: FedScope made available to you free of charge and any further development is supported only by donations. To make a donation, click here.
Q: Can I use FedScope as a plug-in in my own program?
A: Yes, as long as you leave some credit to us in the code.
Q: Can I sell FedScope?
A: Yes, although as we offer it for free, you probably won't be successful at all. You can sell the script as long as you leave some credit to us in the code.
Q: How did you come up with idea for FedScope?
A: This is a good question. I have always wanted to have a method for gathering information on specifically what federal agencies visit my websites, when they visit and how often they visit. I decided to allow others to benefit from the software program that I had asked the folks at Vereor to create for this purpose. And thus FedScope was born.
Q: Who actually wrote FedScope?
A: FedScope and this website were designed and created by Nick Mahon at Vereor Studios.
Q: Will you ever release a new version of FedScope?
A: Depends. If we receive lots of great suggestions for improvements, and if you donate to our development team, we will be able to make the additions you want.
This page contains commonly asked questions we hear about FedScope and their answers. Please read this page before you contact us or post in the user forums for assistance. Nothing is more annoying than answering the same question countless times.
Q: How much does FedScope cost?
A: FedScope made available to you free of charge and any further development is supported only by donations. To make a donation, click here.
Q: Can I use FedScope as a plug-in in my own program?
A: No. You may only use FedScope in your website and must not make it part of any other program without written permission of the authors to do so.
Q: Can I sell FedScope?
A: No. If we catch you selling FedScope you can rest assured you will be hauled into a court of law to answer for copyright infringement. We, the authors of FedScope, choose to make the program available to the masses without charge or obligation. You are not permitted to sell this program, nor are you permitted to include it in any compilation of software that will be sold for any amount.
Q: How did you come up with idea for FedScope?
A: This is a good question. I have always wanted to have a method for gathering information on specifically what federal agencies visit my websites, when they visit and how often they visit. I decided to allow others to benefit from the software program that I had asked the folks at Vereor to create for this purpose. And thus FedScope was born.
Q: Who actually wrote FedScope?
A: FedScope and this website were designed and created by Nick Mahon at Vereor Studios.
Q: Will you ever release a new version of FedScope?
A: Depends. If we receive lots of great suggestions for improvements, and if you donate to our development team, we will be able to make the additions you want.
If you read the FQA you would think software was writen at Microsoft. At first glance they seem to be GPL clueless at best.
This would also have the advantage that is someone deleted even part of a file the could even get that back later.
Make nightly (incremental) backups on a 14 day rotation. Putting them on a large file storage system.
Than create some perl scripts to retrieve the files when someone wants to.
$>getback letter_to_customer*
(0) letter_to_customer_20020927
(1) letter_to_customer_20020928
(2) letter_to_customer_20020930
Which one (enter for all)?
Of course a GUI would be more office friendly.
All the parts would be off the shelf so you can say it is not a test case. And you would have a backup system that had day to day value.
Could Trademark be used to protect the character?
This would not protect the stories/product but would limit someone from using conducting there business using the characters? Or maybe there needs to be some other type of IP protections that protects characters from being taken while letting copyright go back to its correct length.
I for one am not liking with these ideas. Culture is built on myths and stories. If you can bottle and control the stories you can control the culture.
He is helping the children by helping to build a stronger information commons. It is from that Info Commons that the real developments that will make life better come from.
Much of the ware on the power train comes during and because of startup. I would like the car to start pumping oil and coolant before the engine is started. I would also like a forced warmup.
You would press start and the oil pump would start as well as other subsystems. When the oil and coolant are moving and in place (as well as worm if you live in a cold climate and have oil and coolant heaters) then the engine would start. Once the engine was wormed up you would then be cleared to drive.
THIS COULD BE OVERRIDDEN for an emergency start button in the glove box.
This would increase the lifespan of the car's engine and could be extended to things like setting up the radio, mirrors, seat and other comfort and safety items as well.
I would think the adds would be stripped at the sending/server end. The client should not have to do eanything but convert digits to audio. If they are depending to the client to strip the adds then they are sending them out over the internet even if it is not played at the far end.
Well lets have a look at the questions.
Though a bit out a tangent there more to service than signal. Check out how the banks and airlines are doing also. We will be doing a detailed study of wireless soon.
e ss _voice_perf_a.asp
http://performance.empirix.com/voiceindex/wirel
This stuff may help keep the salt and water out of the contacts. There web page is a bit retro, but the stuff seems to work on all the connections I have tried it on.
http://www.stabilant.com/
I have one (have not been using it for a few years) but it works and works well. Be careful no to rest the cord end on the table it over stresses the cord. You can learn it in about a weekend, proficiency comes a little slower about 2 weeks.
I hacked the Linux driver code to make mine act more like a joystick. The ability to preprogram words and things is a big help.
I might just drag mine out again.
Charles Puffer
Using proprietary software even if it is free, "Free" or what ever still leaves you dependent.
Oh pllllllluuuueeeessseee. Your killing me. What company really has the required skill set to take a OSS project and alter it to their own needs? id say relativly few.
But that true of most proprietary packages as well. A lack of local venders makes this an even bigger problem. At least with Free Software a host of local businesses can be grown to service these needs. In fact this would be a good place for the government to invest as a way to start a local economy in software services.
So they are still tied in to that proprietary system. Only now they are at the whim of a few hundred thousand coders who seem to change stuff in OSS projects at a whim (the linux 2.4 VM change...).
That was bad and it should not have been done the way it was. But I will except the point. Even then there were alternatives like the -ac line.
Something gets changed, and you can do 1 of 2 things:
1. Stick where they are and live with the older version 2. upgrade to the latest version
Kinda the same situation now isnt it?
This is also true. but because Free Software tends to stick to well documented open standards it is less likely the new version will be a must upgrade. If you do need to upgrade you have more choices in how you do it. If version lock or conflict does happen. Setting up an both does not present as large a problem.
only now the economy suffers as no one is buying software.
But lots more people will be buying software services from local vendors. This means the growth of a local industry. There are also national security advantages and economic advantages to not being dependant on far away places for your tools. There are social advantages in that local people can find jobs near there families.
I can really think of only one tool that can get into a corporate arena with any force, and thats openoffice. other tools jsut seem kinda amaturish.
I think this is a weak argument. The hammer and the screwdriver have not changed much since there invention. (at least in the modern age). With tools that can do the job, why even get on the upgrade rat race.
Dont get me wrong, i like OSS, jsut dont say "oooh piracy is advocated in the OSS arena" which is essentially waht u are saying.
No I am not saying that at all.
I am saying that making yourself (an individual or as a nation) dependent of someone else puts you at a state of lesser control.
There is a big difference between being interdependent and being completely dependent. Yes you will be interdependent but you will still have control over the software you have and can create more. You can use your resources to push projects in the direction you want them to go.
Unlicensed copying is not a problem in the Free Software world. There is no "piracy". In fact most Free Software Advocates are against unlicensed copying, it weakens the protections that protect Free Software, it removes some of the advantages, and it is constancy used as a stick to beet Free Software by calming the at Free Software does Advocate "Piracy"
Using proprietary software even if it is free, "Free" or what ever still leaves you dependent.
The only road that is going to help in the long run is to build up the real skills a country is going to need is to go with Free Software. We have been over all the arguments before. It always comes down to who will be in control of the tools. If you are in control of the tools than you have the power reach your goals, if someone else has the tools then it is them that will reach their dreams and you might get the crumbs off the table if you are have dreams that fit their needs.
Is that somewhere between high evil and low evil?
I am not trying to bust your spelling but as a Medieval re-creator the PR problem created by the spelling is a nightmare.
I just spent 4 hours makeing armor adjustmers on a friends suit so we can go to practice tomorrow. I can say with some confedenect that there is a lot more to sword fighting than swinging a stick. I would incorage anyone that wants to learn to take a class or find there local fencing club or find there local SCA practice. There is something to be saI just spent 4 hours making armor adjusters on a friends suit so we can go to practice tomorrow. I can say that there is a lot more to sword fighting than swinging a stick. I would encourage anyone that wants to learn to take a class, find there local fencing club, or find there local SCA practice. There is so much more when you do it for real, I jest don't think there will ever be enough polygons.
Charles Puffer
know in the SCA as
Lord Duncan Forbes Squire to his Grace Brion Tarragon
Ping the server before attemting to get higher level services. :) This can done useing the public switched telephony network or by sending a single client to the server to verify its service status.
Most Meatspace servers will also provide a prodiction of when services will be avalable in the future.
A low serial number, special case, or cover at a premium price. I would consider paying more to have an early one and to help lower the price. The extra cash could go to lowering the price in the Indian market, and by getting the early runs out of the way the price could also drop. Also experienced Linux users could be more helpful in the programming debug process.
I would rather have a network (blue tooth) or something like that that could keep my personal devices (as will as information on my laptop and desktop) synced. I want the phone lists the same and be able to pull a number form an email on my pda and dial it on the phone. It would also be nice if they backed each other up. So if my cell-phone gets smashed I can buy a replacement and the data will fill in from my other devices. (like a RAD array).
is this so different?