Slashdot Mirror


Simputer Runs Into Problems

dejaffa writes "It seems that an Indian Linux-based "computer for the poor" is having financial issues. This has implications for the world digital divide. The story is here (MSNBC, I know, I know). There were originally great hopes for it, as seen here, but money is proving to be the stumbling block."

228 comments

  1. This together with.. by 216pi · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ... th story about Mandrake Hits Wal-Mart who are selling computers for less than twice the price is interesting....

  2. Re:why not blow a little karma? by hyperstation · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...damn

  3. We need more of those by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a third world citizen, I'd really like to see more projects like this one. I know a lot of poor, smart, tech-savvy children who probably won't get their hands in a computer in their whole lives.

    1. Re:We need more of those by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a third world citizen, I'd really like to see more projects like this one.

      Well then, get to it.

    2. Re:We need more of those by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pardon me but i don't see ow they are "tech-savvy" if they have no real interaction with tecnnology

  4. what by FigBugDeux · · Score: 1

    Wat? You can't sell a computer for $200... i wondered why they were always more in the store. I figured t was the evils of multinational corporations.

    1. Re:what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another fictious crisis manufactured by the media -- 'digital divide'

      I wonder how many of the starving masses in Africa can attest their lack of internet /computer access to the western corporations....

      Hmmm...I wonder if any of their destitution is because of their country's leaders....???

  5. well, what do you expect? by Transient0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    when you try to base a real world business plan on sim-dollars(simoleans). The sims may be a pretty impressive environment, but it's not reality yet.

    On the other hand, $200 would be a nice change for a cheap sim-puter. I always thought $999 was a bit steep for an entry-level model.

    1. Re:well, what do you expect? by AtomicBomb · · Score: 2

      Simputer is a cool idea, but based on bad commerical decision. With a form factor like a PDA, they are effectively competing for the same type of high cost components, manufacturing facilities with all the major players in the market. Business is business, you should not expect others to do you a favour.

      Even the projected 50000 units in a year (for 2004) is not a big number. If I were the Simputer Foundation, I would try to cut a deal with cheap PDA manufacturers for a standard PDA and focus on just providing Linux specialised software initially.

    2. Re: Well, what do you expect? by Corvus9 · · Score: 1

      One hint for clueless moderators who gave this comment a "+2: Interesting"; the poster is making a joke about The Sims computer game. "Sim-puter" = "computer for the simulated people called 'Sims' in the game".

      +2: Interesting (shakes head sadly).

  6. Shame by damu · · Score: 1

    Unless Gateway or Dell or any of the big computer makers can brand their name on this device this will never fly. There is no room for future upgrades, there is no room for a returning sale on this device. This will be a one time purchase and thats it, you will never see customer again. Unfortunately the ones hurt are those who would benefit the most and do not have that money to afford it. Sad Sad World.

    --


    Useless sig.
  7. Why are computers necessary in India? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Realistically they could use paved roads for more benefit of the people. Although when you consider this country has nuclear missles and horrible infrastructure you have to wonder where their priorities are focused.

    1. Re:Why are computers necessary in India? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when you consider this country has nuclear missles and horrible infrastructure you have to wonder where their priorities are focused.

      Not getting blown up by the Chicoms or Pakis would be my guess.

    2. Re:Why are computers necessary in India? by $0+31337 · · Score: 0

      Thats right! Some of us are forced to drive *SHUDDER* BMWs ;)

    3. Re:Why are computers necessary in India? by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      there are more people homeless and starving in America than there are people living in mansions. there are many, many, many more people homeless and starving in India than there are in America. the difference is that in America, the majority of the homeless are homeless because they are either crazy or lazy, while in India, they are born to it, a generation at a time.

      projects like this make you wonder, what if every child in America were given a computer. would it really change that much? doubtful, but it might make a little ripple. most of the people who could benefit the most from having a computer are too busy working 80 hours a week at minimum wage jobs to have a chance to use them, regardless of being able to afford them.

      --
      MORTAR COMBAT!
    4. Re:Why are computers necessary in India? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      modded as flamebait? very interesting... somebody not have their morning coffee?

      -ac

    5. Re:Why are computers necessary in India? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yup, good mod, obviously this post was offtopic.

      *tards.

      -ac

  8. of course. by kipple · · Score: 3, Interesting

    there's plenty of food for the entire human being (as reported by the recent FAO meeting) but people are starving because feeding the poor doesn't pay back.

    there's plenty of money for the simputer but it has financial issues because, well, poor people won't put money into the economy of the internet.

    so sad.

    --
    -- There are two kind of sysadmins: Paranoids and Losers. (adapted from D. Bach)
    1. Re:of course. by meadowsp · · Score: 1

      So how much have you given to feed the poor today?

    2. Re:of course. by kipple · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      a slashdot post. what about you?

      --
      -- There are two kind of sysadmins: Paranoids and Losers. (adapted from D. Bach)
    3. Re:of course. by ObviousGuy · · Score: 1

      Today, Habib, a great man named kipple has posted a comment on something called the Internet. You shall not hunger today. Praise Vishnu!

      --
      I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    4. Re:of course. by TheGeneration · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Why should we feed the poor? In a matter of a couple hundred years America managed to transform the wilderness into a land with enough food to feed it's people (and then some). But why should we sell food for less than it costs to make? We should we give it away to free? These starving societies have been around for hundreds, or thousands of years longer than us and yet still find themselves starving?!

      This may sound like a troll, but it's not meant to be: Perhaps we should let them die. Obviously their culture has some major defects and it would be far better for them to die and give up their lands to those who would be productive with the land than to allow their lands to continue to be under utilized.

      --


      The Generation
      I'd say something witty here, but I'm not that bright.
    5. Re:of course. by Surlyboi · · Score: 2

      Why should we feed the poor? In a matter of a couple hundred years America managed to transform the wilderness into a land with enough food to feed it's people (and then some).

      Nevermind the fact that it was done with an
      abundance of arrable land and at the expense of
      the people that were on that land first...

      But why should we sell food for less than it costs to make? We should we give it away to free?

      Because we're not using it to begin with and we're
      paying farmers not to sell it. Why? because
      we have too much food in the US. Now, this
      is changing, as we're losing farmland to urbanization
      and the population of the US is growing as well.
      But, at present, we make too much and then sit on
      it. Do you really think it's better to let the
      food rot in silos across the US than give it away?

      These starving societies have been around for hundreds, or thousands of years longer than us and yet still find themselves starving?!

      Some of these people live in places where the soil
      has been tapped out from too much harvesting,
      others in places where planting is nearly impossible.
      A bunch of people in the US find themselves starving
      as well. Poverty knows no specific culture.

      "Sound like a troll?" If it ain't, it sure as hell
      should be. No, we shouldn't just let them die...

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine...
  9. Dumbass!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    What the hell do you expect? It is not a good business plan to try to sell products TO PEOPLE THAT HAVE NO MONEY! Call Susan Sarandon and she is she gives a damn about the poor in India and if they need computers. My guess, they need food, water and shelter before they need a PC to surf Indian Porn.

    I am unclean!

    1. Re:Dumbass!!! by John+Biggabooty · · Score: 0

      Computers for the starving, homeless and naked? Reminds me of horn-tooting American Christian missionaries going to Africa to give the natives Bibles, instead of food clothing and shelter. English language King James versions to boot. Lousy dogooders either don't understand the problems they are trying to solve, or don't give a damn about anything but looking holier than thou. The dogooders can shove the simputers sideways up their ass.

      --
      That's Bigboo TAY! TAY!
    2. Re:Dumbass!!! by uncoveror · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Reminds me of Cincinnati Ohio's plan to give free condoms to i.v. drug users, when they spread AIDS by sharing needles, not by sex. That was a ridiculous dogooder project. I think Coucilman Tyrone Yates came up with that one.

      --
      The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
    3. Re:Dumbass!!! by TheGeneration · · Score: 1

      You're kidding right? The reason you give out condoms to IV drug users is so that they don't infect NON IV drug users who they sleep with. Yes that's right you may not even know you've slept with an IV drug user... until you test HIV+. Just because a person is an IV drug user doesn't mean they LOOK like they are.

      --


      The Generation
      I'd say something witty here, but I'm not that bright.
    4. Re:Dumbass!!! by uncoveror · · Score: 2

      My point is that they should have done a needle exchange, or at least given instructions for sanitizing needles with bleach and/or rubbing alcohol. There were already several free condom programs for anyone who wanted them. The program ignored the real problem with IV drug use, and was just a photo op for a grandstanding politician.

      --
      The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
    5. Re:Dumbass!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you want IV drug users to get AIDS and die. Just don't take anyone else with you.

  10. Mandrake as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have a financial operation (increase of capital) that allows people buy new MandrakeSoft shares. Very interesting to read!

    See http://www.mandrakesoft.com/company/investors/bsa

  11. "the" stumbling block by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It also has a stupid name (it isn't simulated, it's a real computer). Plus poor Indians are unlikely to have electricity or phone lines, which kind of makes it moot anyway.

    1. Re:"the" stumbling block by PierceLabs · · Score: 1

      Heaven forbid is be a simplification of SIMPle ComPUTER.

  12. Simputer in Financial Troubles by Peapod · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does anyone else see the irony here? An idea conceived to help a nation with some of the poorest people in the world recover at least somewhat financially, and the people wanting to manufacture it cannot even afford to have it produced.

    Wonderful.

    -Peapod

    1. Re:Simputer in Financial Troubles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Hey, gotta save money for all those nukes!

      How 'bout save some money from the G7 nuke budget? the money we'd save on _that_ -- why, we'd have a _real_ shot at ending world hunger!

      Oh, I forgot, it's the White Man's Burden to keep the peace, throughout the world. Sorry for being outspoken, will get back to work at my plantation now.

    2. Re:Simputer in Financial Troubles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, instead it is the White Man's Burden to hold the hands of inferior cultures who have had millions of starving for centuries and give them for free that which we have toiled to produce. you fucking commie.

  13. Noble maybe, but realistic? by taeric · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While I can certainly understand the desire to get technology "to the people," I do have to wonder about the uses.

    It is nice to think that a farmer could use such a device to get prices on equipment and such from around the world, however, what good will it do them? They still will probably be forced to buy what is easily provided.

    Instead, this seems like a case where people are just hoping that a computer can magically fix so many problems. I don't understand it, how exactly is the computer supposed to be the answer that solves world poverty?

    Should we not instead look to get more usefull technology to these farmers and other poor nations? Technologies that can in fact help them lead healthier more productive lives? Hell, a simple education could probably work wonders for many of them.

    -josh

    1. Re:Noble maybe, but realistic? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

      You are both 100% right and 100% wrong.

      The fault that you as so many western people make is thinking the rest of the world is one bleak desert with childeren starving while their parents fight decade long wars over so much sand.

      These areas do exist and putting computers here is indeed useless, many projects in the past have done this, or things like it I still can recall as failed project that had ppl knitting sweaters in africa.

      India however, and some other countries, is different. It has got money, a 27 billion software industry for one (you didn't think XP as US made did you?), it as got just about enough food to feed most of its citizens, most of the time.

      But now it needs to make the next step and this one is perhaps the hardest, you only need peace for farmers to farm their crops. You need knowledge to get them to farm the right crops, at the right time, to increase productivity so that a draught in one area is offset by others. You need people to think a head and build dykes and reservoirs. These things require people to learn things and that is where projects like this come in.

      As to you're point of more usefull technologies, many a western tractor is standing in africa for want of part, fuel, instruction manuals or because people are to busy fighting. The most usefull "technology" we could export to those poorest nations you mention is peace. Only then will people have time to farm and feed themselves, and they need little more for this then a stick and seeds.

      --

      MMO Quests are like orgasms:

      You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    2. Re:Noble maybe, but realistic? by Derwen · · Score: 3, Insightful
      It is nice to think that a farmer could use such a device to get prices on equipment and such from around the world, however, what good will it do them? They still will probably be forced to buy what is easily provided. Instead, this seems like a case where people are just hoping that a computer can magically fix so many problems. I don't understand it, how exactly is the computer supposed to be the answer that solves world poverty?
      You have a rather narrow view of peoples' chance for progress :-(

      Whilst the farmer may carry on with her farm, with little direct and immediate benefit to herself from the computer, it could mean a lot for her children.
      Tech jobs is a growth sector in India (unlike in Europe atm) and early access to technology for children of the poor can lead to them getting out of povrty - through a good job - and then helping others in their family/community, too.

      You might as well question what use a cheap PC is to someone who works in your local "burger bar" - after all, it won't help them with their burger-flipping :-/
      - Derwen

      --
      http://fsfeurope.org/
    3. Re:Noble maybe, but realistic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Tech jobs is a growth sector in India (unlike in Europe atm) and early access to technology for children of the poor can lead to them getting out of povrty - through a good job - and then helping others in their family/community, too.

      It's funny, politicians had basically the same idea in mind for this country, too. The idea was that, if only we could teach all those f#$%ing people in the slums and ghettoes how to be software engineers, we could cure poverty!

      Then the NASDAQ went to hell and people finally started to get a clue: gee, maybe there isn't actually demand for IT workers out there!

    4. Re:Noble maybe, but realistic? by obnoximoron · · Score: 1

      There's no single answer to solving world poverty. You have to try in all the ways you can. And providing computers to the poor can be one of them. One big problem can be solved by the accumulation of a thousand little contributions. (can you say open-source community?)
      No one is touting the Simputer as a one-step magic cure for world poverty. Its just an honest little attempt by some Indian geeks trying to make a difference in whatever way they can. Even if the Simputer project proves to be misguided and fails, the fact is that they tried. Other similar projects may follow which will learn from the mistakes of this one. This may very well be a pioneering project that sets a trend.

    5. Re:Noble maybe, but realistic? by taeric · · Score: 1

      I believe I came accross as sounding too harsh against the people we are supposedly trying to help.

      My harshness is instead towards many of the people that think computers are a solution to the problems of the world.

      As per your examples. I guess I should not have said more usefull "technologies." Instead, I should have just said more usefull aid. I don't look at computers by themselves as an automatic enabler. It is like the old saying "give someone a fish, you've fed them for the day. Teach them to fish, you've fed them forever." Now, there are obviously holes in the analogy, but I still believe we should be doing more to help then just dumping computers on them.

      I guess I am basically saying, giving a computer to someone does not make them better at what they were doing. Instead, educating someone at what they were doing can work wonders.

      Also, as an aside, I like the idea of recycling old computers. Provided they honestly have a use for them. I know that for many small "burger flipping" like places of work, a computer is just added baggage on running business. Does a small store honestly need the "flexibility" given by computers?

      -josh

    6. Re:Noble maybe, but realistic? by taeric · · Score: 1

      I guess that was my misunderstanding from the article, then.

      Yes, getting better technology to these people is surely a "good" thing. However, the article was about getting technology to the poor farmers and such. The article sounded to me as if they were trying to create a market for a really cheap computer.

      Instead, I think if you want to provide a cheap computer to a market, it should be to a market that wants and needs computers but that can not afford them. This would fit in with what you said.

      My using of a farmer as an example was because the article did. I do not think of the world as a barren wasteland outside of the USA. That is just silly. But I also do not think that a farmer will automatically farm better with a computer. That takes knowledge and opportunity, as you pointed out. Neither are provided magically by a computer.

      Does that make sense? It is when I see people trying to fabricate a market by which computers can solve a problem that irritate me.

      -josh

    7. Re:Noble maybe, but realistic? by jafuser · · Score: 2

      There's no financial incentive to making the masses smarter. As a matter of fact, I'm sure some large-corporate executives would find it in their best interests that the public remain as ignorant as possible, so they won't be aware of what they're buying, eating, smelling in the water, etc.

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    8. Re:Noble maybe, but realistic? by Quixote · · Score: 2
      It is nice to think that a farmer could use such a device to get prices on equipment and such from around the world, however, what good will it do them? They still will probably be forced to buy what is easily provided.

      In a fairly efficient market (like the USA), you take a lot of things for granted. However, things are a bit different in India. There are a lot of middlemen involved, and information is a scarce commodity (I'm speaking of market information). In this situation, an "enabling device" like this Simputer can make a difference. There's no guarantee that it will, but there's a possibility that it will. And that is all that one can hope for.

      If a farmer can, through a simple search, figure out the best (selling) prices for his corn/wheat/cotton/etc. in the neighborhood, he can take advantage of that. This information then gets translated into real rupees in his pocket.

      Heck, even decent weather forecasts can mean a lot to most of them.

      We have to stop pigeon-holing the Internet into a fixed perceived role. What uses a, say, aborogine in Australia has for the Internet is best determined by her, and not by someone like me sitting here in the USA. I say provide people with the tools, and see what they make of them.

    9. Re:Noble maybe, but realistic? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

      I was going to point out a lot of stuff that others already did, as well as agree with you on some.

      Instead lets think of this as the glass being half full/empty. Their have been many embarissing projects in developing nations that only did more harm. I just hope that someday people get it right by balancing what is needed with what is desired, either by their recipitient(?) or the donator. The fact that this was/is done in India itself sounds hopefull. At least with this method they won't end up with a lot of hardware none of the locals know how to maintain or can't afford to buy a new license for (happened with projects donating hardware to schools but not allowed to use the software from M$).

      Of course they may just be trying to flog ice to the eskimos I just hope not

      --

      MMO Quests are like orgasms:

      You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  14. Price problem by Chardish · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Computers aren't cheap. They never have been. When it comes to food, shelter, medicine, or computers, what do you think has the lowest spending priority for a poor person?

    -evan

    1. Re:Price problem by mangu · · Score: 2, Troll
      Computers aren't cheap. They never have been.

      Yes, the whole point in the Simputer project was to change that.

      When it comes to food, shelter, medicine, or computers, what do you think has the lowest spending priority for a poor person?

      Give a poor person food, shelter, and medicine, and you will solve his problems today. Give him a computer and he will be able to afford the food, shelter, and medicine he needs in the future.

    2. Re:Price problem by Insightfill · · Score: 1
      Agreed. I think (this time) Bill Gates has it right about the "digital divide":

      If you're hungry and still in a country where many people are dying of dysentary, measles, malaria, etc. (preventable stuff), then 'Net access is a non-issue.

      Last I remember from Psych class, Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs had "surfing the 'net" nowhere near "food".

    3. Re:Price problem by bluprint · · Score: 1

      Give him a computer and he will be able to afford the food, shelter, and medicine he needs in the future.

      Huh? How exactly is that going to happen? The biggest thing people in third world countries need (generally speaking) is freedom. If they could get that, education, food, and even computers would follow suit.

      --
      A modern day witchhunt.
    4. Re:Price problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Give him a computer and he will be able to afford the food, shelter, and medicine he needs in the future.

      How? Is he going to download it?

      I think you have a deeply messed up view of the third world.

    5. Re:Price problem by Twylite · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you're hungry and in a country where many people are dying of preventable illnesses, education is the greatest key to upliftment.

      Most children have to forgo the opportunity of education in order to survive, because they are needed at home to contribute. This means that they don't have the time to walk 15km to and from school every day, as many children in Africa do.

      A broader base of accessible computers is a means to improve this situation. It will allow literacy improvement at home for many children and adults. It will also bring knowledge on how to avoid preventable diseases, primarily through basic nutrition and sanitation.

      These are areas of adult education that have been notoriously difficult to target because of a lack of resources, and the target audience being illiterate and not having the time to devote to learning.

      An interactive medium like a computer does not require literacy, and can be used to teach literacy. It can also (through expert systems) substitute for a doctor or paramedic when experts are not on hand (say, 100km away on a dirt road).

      The digital divide is not about people who don't have (quake|word processing|e-mail) versus those who do, it is about the failure to use modern (digital) technologies to address issues in underdeveloped countries.

      Maslow's Hierarchy is a model, and as with most models it is not entirely accurate, nor is it intended to function without context. 'Surfing the net' may not feature, but security needs and social needs -- both of which are enabled through education -- are directly above physical/biological needs.

      --
      i-name =twylite [http://public.xdi.org/=twylite], see idcommons.net
    6. Re:Price problem by $0+31337 · · Score: 0

      Give him a computer and he will be able to afford the food, shelter, and medicine he needs in the future.

      Ummm... Right. Because, as soon as you give a poor person a simputer, they're going to become great kernel hackers and get jobs at RedHat.

    7. Re:Price problem by cygnusx · · Score: 1
      If you're hungry and in a country where many people are dying of preventable illnesses, education is the greatest key to upliftment.
      <pedantic> uplift </pedantic>

      Sorry for splitting hairs :-) but in a post about education it was too tempting to resist.
    8. Re:Price problem by FatRatBastard · · Score: 1

      A broader base of accessible computers is a means to improve this situation.

      Barely, if at all. Computers are not the end-all and be-all of education. There are more important things to spend money on in impoverished areas, like reading and writing. Focus on the basics first, where your money stretches a hell of a lot farther. You do not need a computer to learn to read, write, do math, etc. Computers are tools (and when it comes to education very specialized tools, not cure alls) and expensive ones at that. Shoving a computer in front a population doesn't make them any smarter.

      It will allow literacy improvement at home for many children and adults.

      So will books, and they're a hell of a lot cheaper.

      It will also bring knowledge on how to avoid preventable diseases, primarily through basic nutrition and sanitation.

      Again, so do books and *doctors*. Throwing a computer in front of the masses isn't going to all of the sudden transform them into nutritional experts.

      Computers are fun (I own way too many of them), but they are simply tools, no more, no less. They are no cureall for education. As Cliff Stoll pointed out, the lowly filmstrip 60 years ago was givin same hype as computers now for their supposed "revolutionizing" of education. I'll take a crap teacher over a good filmstrip (if there is such a thing) any day.

    9. Re:Price problem by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2

      As has been stated earlier the price is prohibitive if you think of it as a personal computer. Its a communal computer. For instance this is marketed for a typical small village that has one phone line and one phone.

      I really don't know if this can do what its promised to do. For instance by connecting your simputer with the phone you can get daily prices on what your crop is worth and what you grow is selling for at different places. Hypothetically, the poor village could be making smarter selling and buying decisions which can only lead to being less poor. Whether this is practical is beyond me. If some province or other village has cotton cheap is a nice fact to know but delivering the goods is totally a different story. Depending on how much infrastructure you have in place it could work out very well for all concerned.

      Then there's education software. Who knows it could connect to a medical diagnostic database.

      The real problem I see here is expecting this gamble, which it really is, to work in a non-subsidized market. Not only is the price prohibitive in a few respects (afterall it is an investment, communal or not), its also only effective if everyone has one. This thing will probably not go anywhere without government subsidies.

    10. Re:Price problem by qubit64 · · Score: 1

      Tell that to the Russians.

      --
      "Save me jebus!" - Homer Simpson (btw, I'm probably talkin out of me arse)
    11. Re:Price problem by mangu · · Score: 2
      The biggest thing people in third world countries need (generally speaking) is freedom.

      And the reason why they don't have freedom is because they live in countries which do not produce enough goods for everybody. No starving person can ever be free.

      The only way for a country to improve from a "Third World" situation is to acquire an industrial technology, sufficiently advanced to compete in the world market against the "First World". See, for instance, South Korea and Taiwan. And, as long as computers are a privilege of the upper classes, the acute social distortions found in all Third World countries will continue to exist.

      I think the problem in this thread is that people assume those "simputers" would be distributed in refugee camps. If you have $200 to spend, in a Third World country you are already "middle class", and can also afford the basics you need to survive. If you can use a computer, you already have a basic education. The idea in selling cheap computers is to give tools to those who need them more, people who have the talent to be much more productive if given an opportunity.

      I should know, I live in Brazil and have seen the huge improvement in living conditions that technology brings. For instance, five years ago in this country, telecommunication services were a state monopoly. The federal-government-owned phone companies were unable to satisfy the demand for telephones, one had to buy them in the black market for over $5000. In 1998 cheap cell phones became available from privatized companies; today any day laborer in Brazil has a cell phone. A perfect example of technology increasing the productivity of low-skill workers in the Third World.

    12. Re:Price problem by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > Last I remember from Psych class, Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs had "surfing the 'net" nowhere near "food".

      Maslow was evidently never a coder :)

    13. Re:Price problem by foobar104 · · Score: 2, Troll

      And, as long as computers are a privilege of the upper classes, the acute social distortions found in all Third World countries will continue to exist.

      Aren't you confusing computers with opportunity? Personally I don't buy the ``social inequity is the root of all evil'' and ``the class system is inherently bad'' arguments, but let's set that aside for a minute. Giving a random person off the street a computer does not, in any way, enable him to improve his station in life. In order to do that, he's going to have to go out and get an education (if he lacks one) and a good job. Having a computer won't help him with those things.

      In 1998 cheap cell phones became available from privatized companies; today any day laborer in Brazil has a cell phone. A perfect example of technology increasing the productivity of low-skill workers in the Third World.

      You left out the part about how having a cell phone increases the productivity of a low-skill worker. If you're a salesman or something, and your job is based on talking to people on the phone, then having a cell phone might make you more productive. But if you work in a field or a factory or something, having a cell phone won't improve your productivity in any measurable way.

      Your argument is really specious.

    14. Re:Price problem by TheGeneration · · Score: 1

      Okay. so this person doesn't have Food, Shelter, or Medicine but they have an electric socket in the wall of their cardboard shanty to plug a computer into?

      You're kidding right? This buisiness model was a VERY stupid idea. A point of a buisiness is to make money. You cannot make money off of people who do not have any money, or the ability to generate any money.

      --


      The Generation
      I'd say something witty here, but I'm not that bright.
    15. Re:Price problem by TheGeneration · · Score: 1

      Ah yes... a computer is going to fix the problems of a 3000 year old society that is floundering and unable to pull anybody out of poverty even though they've had 3000 years to do it. Aren't you all being just a little bit blind?

      We are talking about countries and societies that absolutely REFUSE to take the steps neccessary to increase living standards. America has created a super power within 200 years. INDIA has had 3000 years, and yet can't seem to do anything besides create densly populated shanty villages.

      --


      The Generation
      I'd say something witty here, but I'm not that bright.
    16. Re:Price problem by mangu · · Score: 2
      You left out the part about how having a cell phone increases the productivity of a low-skill worker.

      I didn't want to extend an already long post, but, since you asked, people who benefit most from a cell phone are unemployed people doing odd jobs. For gardeners, housekeepers, plumbers, etc, it can make a huge difference when one can be readily called to do some job that appears. I first realized this when I was at a meeting at my company and a phone went off. It belonged to the cleaning woman who had come in to clean a coffee spill.

    17. Re:Price problem by mangu · · Score: 2
      You cannot make money off of people who do not have any money

      These people DO have money. The Simputer would cost $200, they would need at least that much money to buy one. I don't know about India, but in Brazil $200 is two months minimum wage. People with $200 to spend in a computer in the Third World do not live in cardboard shanties. They live in brick houses, much more solid than the particleboard panels used in most homes in the USA.

    18. Re:Price problem by jkramar · · Score: 1

      A point which keeps getting brought up is that of the potentially prohibitive $200 price of a Simputer. However, this can be addressed in many ways, of which subsidy would be one. Another has been included in the project itself; they would run on "Smart Cards", and thus 1 or 2 could satisfy a whole community, assuming they had not used it before. Of course, I do not know how much a smart card would cost, but I assume (hopefully correctly) that they have been designed to be cheap, light, and small. (Rural families without massive personalization (.profile, etc.) do not actually need very much data on the cards.)

      --

      true && more || less
    19. Re:Price problem by cygnusx · · Score: 2

      > INDIA has had 3000 years, and yet can't seem to do anything

      This country was a loose confederation of states for most of those 3000 years, and most had no joint standing army. One invasion after another -- Aryan, Hun, Moslem, British, not to mention the (more than the?) usual quota of internal intrigue (a la europe) raped India quite enough. Think about that, you prick, before passing snap judgements on 1.1 billion people.

      > We are talking about countries and societies that absolutely REFUSE to take the steps neccessary to increase living standards.

      How do _you_ know? Go and check out how the GDP has risen over the past 15 years. Check out the cost of living too, while you're about it. Check out how basic health services, telecom, transport have improved. Can we do better? Sure! We have crappy leaders, imho, and our education system could use a thorough cleanup. But are we _not trying at all_? No, you pampered little snot. We are _trying_, and it may take longer than your lifetime or mine, but I think we'll get there, with help or without.

    20. Re:Price problem by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      You're really reaching here. Having a cell phone, with only tiny exceptions, doesn't make anyone more employable. It's irrelevant to a person's overall social or financial standing.

      If having a cell phone meant you were suddenly skilled at operating machine tools, or educated at a significantly higher level, that might mean something. But being able to make and receive phone calls doesn't make you more employable, or put you in a better job. It just helps you do your existing job better. That's not going to do anything to affect social or economic inequity.

    21. Re:Price problem by jafuser · · Score: 2
      Who knows it could connect to a medical diagnostic database.

      Ah, yet another vision of the future which will never come to be (like flying cars). And who's going to pay for access to this database? It's not going to sit online for free, consuming hundreds if not thousands of watts of power and kilo/megabits of bandwidth in some rack somewhere.

      Didn't the late 90s show that the 'net can *not* provide useful, reliable information, for free? Sometimes you can find an online source which fits two of those three, but most of the time it's only one.

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    22. Re:Price problem by mangu · · Score: 2

      When a pipe blows up and your kitchen is under water, do call a plumber who has a phone or do you go all the way to his home to see if he's available? For a low skill-worker whose livelihood depends on small services, a phone means a huge difference in employability.

    23. Re:Price problem by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      But we're talking about cellular phones in particular. We did a lot of business for a long time before cellular phones became available. I still don't think the argument is valid.

    24. Re:Price problem by Maledictus · · Score: 1

      Definitely reaching.

      A plumber is not a low-skilled worker. At least not where I come from. They're highly skilled, actually and yes, well paid. Plus, you seem to be confusing "self-employed" with "unemployed."

      The only thing technology gave people such as plumbers (okay, I'm gonna beat your bad analogy to death, sorry) is an inexpensive method of communicating. And before cell phones, they had radio dispatch or a voice mail system. And before that, you had to wait until the guy got all his messages at the end of the day, I suppose. But this didn't make him more employable or more skilled as a plumber. It made him more productive. It was a communication tool, not a plumbing training course.

      But that's really why your analogy is bad. You grabbed a group of skilled workers and gave them cell phones. Now try this, grab a group of *truly* *unskilled* workers - perhaps people who don't have the education to read their native language and give them a cell phone or a computer. What then? How does even an inexpensive computer help someone who can't read? It can't. Not in a vacuum. That truly unskilled person will need help with *reading.* That's a skill that can't be taught just by plunking down the computer on a table or handing that person a cell phone.

      Technology does not magically impart skills upon the unskilled or education upon the uneducated.

      --
      Consigned to flames of woe.
    25. Re:Price problem by TheGeneration · · Score: 1

      They live in brick houses, much more solid than the particleboard panels used in most homes in the USA.

      And yet those particle board panels last our entire lifetimes. Not to mention particle board panels are safer than bricks in California (earthquake country).

      --


      The Generation
      I'd say something witty here, but I'm not that bright.
    26. Re:Price problem by TheGeneration · · Score: 1

      LOL.

      The only reason India is a superpower is because they have 4 times as many people as the US to throw at every problem that comes up. If it were a one to one comparison the Indian workforce would come up short everytime.

      --


      The Generation
      I'd say something witty here, but I'm not that bright.
    27. Re:Price problem by TheGeneration · · Score: 1

      By the way, don't get me wrong... I love India. What it lacks in monetary wealth it makes up for in spritual and philosophical wealth.

      --


      The Generation
      I'd say something witty here, but I'm not that bright.
    28. Re:Price problem by Derek+S · · Score: 1

      Which doesn't change the fact that India does have four times as many people as the US to throw at every problem that comes up.

    29. Re:Price problem by mangu · · Score: 2
      A plumber is not a low-skilled worker. At least not where I come from.

      I come from Rio de janeiro, Brazil, were a plumber is "low-skill". In Brazil, a "skilled" worker is a lawyer, engineer, dentist, someone who has gone through college, or, at least, some sort of professional training course, like a lathe operator, agronomist, electronics technician, or accountant.

      Cutting and fitting pipes is a profession that can be learned in a few days. Having a cell phone does not make such a professional more skilled, but it makes it easier for him to get job assignments. It makes him more productive because he gets more customers. Instead of sitting idle most of the day, he can be cutting and fitting pipes with a hacksaw. He doesn't need to know how to read and write to do that, but he needs to know exactly where his services are needed at a given time.

    30. Re:Price problem by Twylite · · Score: 2

      According to Google, 33000 lemmings^Wpeople think you're wrong. So does the Oxford English Dictionary.

      You're American right ...?

      --
      i-name =twylite [http://public.xdi.org/=twylite], see idcommons.net
    31. Re:Price problem by Twylite · · Score: 2

      I think you missed my point entirely. In many rural communities, especially in Africa (the situation in India, specifically, is different), people don't have access to education because of the distances involved in getting to facilities.

      Studies have shown that computers CAN, if used correctly, address this problem, and be a substitute, not simply a tool, for traditional basic education. This is because a computer CAN be used to teach literacy, basic mathematics, etc, and most importantly CAN be located nearer to the target audience than traditional resources (such as teachers).

      Books are useless without literacy. Even for the literate, educational books are of questionable value without a suitable guide. This is a basic flaw in using a non-interactive medium for education. Only once you have learned to educate yourself (which is supposed to be the basic skill you learn at a University) can you be reasonably expected to learn from books. (This isn't to say that people don't, but rather that not all people do).

      Regarding medical knowledge, I was referring to expert systems, not to medical texts. In a community where there is no doctor, an maybe only a nurse several kilometers away, an expert system can be a valuable aid.

      Finally, having been taught by several crap teachers, I'll take a filmstrip any day. Educational broadcasts in developing nations are proving to have more success than formal education, because they reach a wider audience, and are presented in a clear and understandable fashion ... completely unlike a lesson from a crap teacher.

      --
      i-name =twylite [http://public.xdi.org/=twylite], see idcommons.net
    32. Re:Price problem by cygnusx · · Score: 2

      > You're American right ...?
      No :-)

      Seriously, is upliftment a real word? I always thought it to be one of those pseudo-words that were popular in some parts of the world -- if you look closely at the Google results, you'll find quite a number of the 33k results to be from pages written by Asians/Africans. I wouldn't be surprised if upliftment was popular in `local' english (for some values of local) but it's hardly a standard word. On the other hand, the OED has over the past few years been very inclusive in its approach to including words from across the globe (jihad from arabic(?), thali from hindi, and so on) so who knows, somebody could have included upliftment as well.

      Encarta can't locate ``upliftment'' (though I know it's hardly the final answer); but then neither does the online cambridge dictionary or dict.org or dictionary.com (which searches through quite a few dictionaries). My old dogeared copy of Oxford Concise also doesn't have the word.

      I don't have a subscription to the OED Online, so I can't go to the ultimate authority :-), but please, if you can give me a citation, I'd be very glad (contact info here).

    33. Re:Price problem by FatRatBastard · · Score: 1

      I see your point, and in a perfect world a good computer based learning system can help, but I still think that today, for 3rd world countries with heaps of problems, this is not the best use of money.

      In many rural communities, especially in Africa (the situation in India, specifically, is different), people don't have access to education because of the distances involved in getting to facilities.

      Studies have shown that computers CAN, if used correctly, address this problem, and be a substitute, not simply a tool, for traditional basic education. This is because a computer CAN be used to teach literacy, basic mathematics, etc, and most importantly CAN be located nearer to the target audience than traditional resources (such as teachers).


      Unfortunatly, this is not "The Diamond Age." Yes, there is some fairly good educational software out there, but none of it is 1/100th as good as having personal interaction with a human. It is not going to replace a teacher. It may augment a teacher, but its not going to replace one.

      Now, assuming that the computers were dirt cheap and it was hard to get a teacher (let alone a school) out to the hinterlands I'd say "what they hey, what harm could it do?" But cheap for us is at least half the yearly income for those who you're targeting. If your parents made $40K a year, would they buy you a $20K computer and expect it to be your sole source of learning? What if the gov't ponyed up the money? Four computers = $80K and you've more than paid for a teacher. I still think 1 teacher will do orders of magnitude better with 4 children than 4 computers, even state of the art ones, could.

      Books are useless without literacy.

      Agreed.

      Even for the literate, educational books are of questionable value without a suitable guide.

      Agreed. The problem is that a computer is not going to bootstrap you into being literate. You are not going to place an illiterate person in front of a computer and with no outside assistance have him or hear read after a certain amount of time. Learning fundamentals takes person to person interactions.

      This is a basic flaw in using a non-interactive medium for education. Only once you have learned to educate yourself (which is supposed to be the basic skill you learn at a University) can you be reasonably expected to learn from books. (This isn't to say that people don't, but rather that not all people do).

      And that's my point. A computer by itself is not going to take you from a blank slate to literate. It takes people to do that (parents, extended family, teachers, friends, etc). Someone would have to do the same groundwork to get to the level that a computer would help them learn as to get a book to help them to learn (and as an aside I think it happens at a much lower level than university). And again, lets look at the cost of everything. Once you've gained a basic literacy which is more cost effective? A computer that costs half your annual income (and this doesn't include any content to fill the computer) or books?

      Regarding medical knowledge, I was referring to expert systems, not to medical texts. In a community where there is no doctor, an maybe only a nurse several kilometers away, an expert system can be a valuable aid.

      As an adjunct to having a doctor I think this is a damn good idea. Expert systems can help a LOT and keep costs down. But you don't need a computer per person for this. One in each village used by someone with some medical training would work well.

      Finally, having been taught by several crap teachers, I'll take a filmstrip any day. Educational broadcasts in developing nations are proving to have more success than formal education, because they reach a wider audience, and are presented in a clear and understandable fashion ... completely unlike a lesson from a crap teacher.

      Educational broadcasters are not the same as a filmstrip. Good educational programming takes a lot of time, effort, and creativity to make effective educational programming. Then of course you have to distribute it. It isn't cheap (but better than just giving kids computers I'll admit).

      To beat a dead horse, it comes back down to $$$ (or rupees). If you are a cash strapped society what are your basic needs and how are you going to pay for them? The cost of outfitting children with computers is WAY too high for the return on investment. You are not going to take a 5 year old thru to 16 and teach him everything he's going to need to know with a computer (and only a computer). You buy *a lot* more literacy and education for your buck by funding teachers, schools, and books. It may not be the sexiest way of doing it, but it surely is the best value for money.

    34. Re:Price problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So who is going to farm in the end? You?

  15. Call for more charity programs... by TibbonZero · · Score: 1

    Perhaps instead of trying to sell the computer they should run as a Non-profit org, and collect computers, accept donations, sell banner placement on their site (to buy parts and pay for building) etc and give away computer to the poor?

    Giving away computers to the poor would be a great thing. Perhaps when a person goes on Suplimental Security or Welfare (not same thing I know) the government should give them a computer too (it's not like they aren't giving them a good bit of money anyway).

    Too bad this company is having problems, because I think it was a good idea

    --
    Tibbon
    tibbon.com
    1. Re:Call for more charity programs... by natefanaro · · Score: 1

      I am not sure if I am getting the idea on banner placement. From the sounds of it, you want poor people to look at banner ads for stuff that they can not buy? They didn't even pay for the PC that they are viewing it on!

      It just wasn't too clear to me.

    2. Re:Call for more charity programs... by TibbonZero · · Score: 2

      Didn't mean to place banners on their computer... I meant placing banners on their website (look up if you aren't subscribed..)

      --
      Tibbon
      tibbon.com
    3. Re:Call for more charity programs... by natefanaro · · Score: 1

      Ahhh. Got it. Thanks for clarifying that for me.

  16. Fucking fund-raise for them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You might be amazed at how much ppl who aren't a direct beneficiary would donate to them to further the same OSS cause.

  17. A shame,,, by SpelledBackwards · · Score: 1

    It's really a shame that something like this can't take off in third world countries in its current state. It's well-intentioned, but I think it really only caters to a specific market, like the farmers or lower-class businessmen the article mentions. While surfing the net isn't a commonly held luxury for impoverished third-worlders, if you've ever tried to generally surf on a handheld, it's not easy or convenient. Many pages appear screwed up because they were designed for larger displays with different/higher resolutions. And other than just surfing, most people and family members wouldn't have much more of a use for that than the pen and paper or calculators they'd already use for math, writing letters, etc.

    I have a Palm VIIx, but it isn't all that useful to me, even when I'm at the dorm. The wireless feature it touted so much is too expensive for most people to use (I got it as a hand-me-down from my dad). It also clips webpages and makes them look pretty weird.Despite being in college, either I'm not busy enough or organized enough to make good use of the calendar, though I do occasionally enter events into it and carry it in my backpack. The feature I use most is the address book, but every month or two I print off the list into a handy sheet I can fold and keep in my wallet, so I don't have to lug the thign around in my pocket (very uncomfortable, as I'm short and thusly my pants have small pockets). I can't always be wearing my jacket or backpack, such as right now that I'm at work.

  18. who cares. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who cares, poor people dont need computers, they need food. so better waste the money for something to eat than something they never understand.

  19. Food, Clothing and Shelter by macdaddy357 · · Score: 0

    The third world poor, like the poor anywhere, need basic food clothing and shelter, not a fucking computer!

    --
    How ya like dat?
    1. Re:Food, Clothing and Shelter by Archie+Steel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you just keep supplying them with the basic necessities, you're not giving them a way out of poverty. If you can provide them with the tools to participate in a booming digital market (in South-East Asia, anyway), then you've done more than help them survive: you've given them a future.

      India is becoming a digital nation, with more and more Western companies outsourcing some of their coding needs there. If people in India feel like they need more computers, then we should believe them. Acting otherwise would be paternalistic, to say the least.

      --

      Reminder: find a new sig
  20. This is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What this company (and a lot of others) fail to realize is that the market for hi-tech devices isn't there until more basic needs are met. This goes for pretty much all third-world nations. There's no point in providing people with new technology when the "old" technology - indoor plumbing, running (clean) water, etc. isn't available to everyone yet. Solve the basic problems first, and only *then* try to sell them computers.

    1. Re:This is stupid by teetam · · Score: 1
      Mr.Coward, you may not realize this, but your viewpoint would coincide very well with the communist viewpoint. Being a proud capitalist, you would never say such a thing about any American innovation, I'm sure.

      It is obvious from many posts like yours and the posts for the previous article about the Simputer, that none of you know anything about India. Of course, that doesn't stop you from posting.

      India, overall, is a country very similar to USA. It is impossible to generalize anything about such a diverse country. Not everyone there is starving or poor. Please clear such stereotypical cobwebs from your brain. It is a free country. If, as you all point out, there is a person without enough money for his basic needs, he will not buy the Simputer. And guess what? The Simputer is not meant for him.

      The middle class in India are more than 300 million strong. Most of them can afford TVs (with cable), a house, stereo equipment and some form of vehicular transportation (all of which cost more than the Simputer). There is definitely a strong market for a simple, reasonably priced computer in India. The Simputer might not be the one, but that is besides the point.

      Most of you are, quite frankly, ignorant about the rest of world. Please stick to posting flames about Microsoft and RIAA.

      --
      All your favorite sites in one place!
  21. too expensive by bigpat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think $200 is still too expensive to be of much use to craftsman and farmers. And what happens when one of these things breaks and you lose all your inventory information or records of who owes you what? I think paper and pencil is probably a much better use of people's time. People should be taught how to use computers in schools, but it does them a disservice to tell them they really need these machines. I fear this is just another way big companies wish to tell people how to live their lives and have gotten the intelectuals to prmote their agendas.

    Reminds me of the big chemical companies promoting pesticides in the third world thus putting entire populations and countries into debt.

    Don't fall for this crap. If it is a choice between a computer and a cleaner water supply, then go for the water.

    1. Re:too expensive by $0+31337 · · Score: 0

      Did you even bother to read the initial article? They said that they were hoping for the government to purchase the simputers and then rent them to townspeople who would each purchase and keep their own smartcard for 1 to 2 dollars apeice.

    2. Re:too expensive by Twylite · · Score: 2

      You're absolutely right: $200 is far too expensive. But...

      A pencil and paper only assist if you are either literate, or able to receive instruction. Computers, on the other hand, can teach literacy. This has huge potential: (in Africa) many people can't take the time to attend literacy classes (which may involve walking 15km or more). There are also a lack of resources to sustain ongoing training.

      Between a computer and cleaner water, sure, go for the cleaner water. But first consider some things: (1) in many places the water is sufficiently clean or at least not a health risk to the population (whereas it may be a risk to a Western visitor who is not accustomed to the local bacteria); (2) without education, most people don't know enough about the importance of clean water and basic sanitation, which in itself is the greatest threat to natural supplies of clean water.

      Reminds me of the big chemical companies promoting pesticides in the third world thus putting entire populations and countries into debt. Supplying cheap(ish) computers is subtly different from supplying engineered toxins which solve your problem for a year or two but poison the environment so that only related products from the same supplier will allow food to grow.

      --
      i-name =twylite [http://public.xdi.org/=twylite], see idcommons.net
    3. Re:too expensive by bigpat · · Score: 2

      yeah, a computer tax sounds like a real good idea for the poor.

      If the government sees that these would be good for it's beaurocracy or good to put in schools as a better way to teach kids and transmit information, but don't call this computing for the poor. It just isn't.

      Real Computing for the poor would empower people to manage their own information and business in a way that adds value to their lives.

      This is nothing, but a marketing ploy which could do more harm than good. Hell, I wouldn't even give a poor person a computer given the huge waste of time and money it could be.

    4. Re:too expensive by Augusto · · Score: 2

      > A pencil and paper only assist if you are either literate, or able to receive instruction. Computers, on the other hand, can teach literacy.

      This little PDA doesn't seem like it would teach an indian farmer how to read, specially when it's main interface requires that you READ!

      How about we send money for real teachers? There's an idea! :-/

      --

      - sigs are for wimps.
  22. Oh please this has nothing to do with poverty !! by gelfling · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A Simputer used to get on the internet and check land records has nothing whatsoever to do with poor people and whether they will subsitute computers for food. This is for mid level people, probably state employees who are sent out to do a job, it's for urban shopkeepers who need to check something online or students who nead and educational tool. In India that's MILLIONS of people.

    The idea that the vastness of India is nothing but barfoot rice farmers and water buffaloes is frankly, insulting.

  23. Well.... by idfrsr · · Score: 2

    This is certainly not overly surprising.
    Trying to get money for development aid is hard enough, getting money together bring comps to rural towns is low on the priority scale when food, shelter and disease are also at issue.

    Doesn't mean we can't keep trying though....

    --
    "The large print giveth, and the small print taketh away" -Tom Waits
  24. Simputer is not for the Avg Joe Yankee by bayankaran · · Score: 0

    Mandrake may hit walmart. But it is still a PC.

    Simputer was developed with portability and low power consumption (runs on standard AA batteries) as key points. Simputer is not meant for the standard redneck or Average Joe Yankee to pull the shopping cart with his PC to his SUV.

    It is meant for the poorest of the poor, usually surviving on 1 or 2 dollars a day. You have information on the fingertips with a DSL connection. They are probably illiterate.

    Your comment reminded me of a great line from the film SALVADOR...we are poor, you in Washington are so rich, but why are you so blind?

    --
    Tat Tvam Asi
    1. Re:Simputer is not for the Avg Joe Yankee by evilempireinc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      you actually bring up a good point. While the creators seem to have put in a lot of thought into how to get funding and distrubute it to rural locations, what about literacy? I know it is supposed to have an intuitive user interface, but what if the users are entirely illiterate? While the computer might be cheap and give them access to the web it won't do them much good if they can't read it

      --
      we can rebuild this sig. we have the technology
    2. Re:Simputer is not for the Avg Joe Yankee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er,

      Illiterate people like this:
      http://www.linezine.com/6.3/themes/bgsrthit w.htm

      You moron.

    3. Re:Simputer is not for the Avg Joe Yankee by evilempireinc · · Score: 1

      Ok. perhaps you misunderstood me somewhat. I wasn't trying to imply that most of india is illiterate, however looking at the 1991 census data literacy rate was 73.08% overall. The literacy rates in some of the poorer states such as Bihar were much lower. Bihar for example had a literacy rate of only 38.5% . In some specific districts it was even lower. Now if you want to sit there and tell me that literacy will not be a factor in the adoption of a computer for the poor, I would say you are missing some important facts.

      --
      we can rebuild this sig. we have the technology
  25. Enough with the stereotypes! by Archie+Steel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not everyone in India is a farmer - in fact it is one of the booming IT market among poorer nations. I went to India 14 years ago, and when a friend of mine who went there recently sent me photos, I was astounded to see the number of "Internet" and "e-mail" signs in the streets. Things have evolved so fast over there! You see, India is trying to go from an agrarian/industrial society to a digital one. In fact, a lot of Western companies outsource some of their coding to India. It seems Indians have a cultural knack for programming and mathematics.

    If they feel like they need computers, then they need computers. The first world trying to decide what the third world needs has rarely worked, like trying to sell heavy farming equipment to people used to work their fragile soil with animal-powered equipment. Since it cost so much to maintain and repair, these expensive agricultural machines often end up collecting dust. In this particular case, I think recycling older computers (i.e. Pentium I and II) and giving them away to poorer nations which want them is a great idea. After all, they are the ones most aware of what their needs are...

    --

    Reminder: find a new sig
    1. Re:Enough with the stereotypes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Mother Teresa made a perfect excuse for us to be patronizing...

    2. Re:Enough with the stereotypes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oops link died... newer one: here

    3. Re:Enough with the stereotypes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > It seems Indians have a cultural knack for programming and mathematics.

      Nah, not really :-) I'd probably credit the education system: it's primitive (think of the English system in the 1940s -- the Indian system hasn't really evolved much from there) but highly effective at separating the wheat from the chaff. Add to that a large population and you're in business. I'd actually rate eastern europe higher in engineering acumen, and note they have a superior (in some senses) legacy -- the old soviet system. Also note that education systems in China/SE Asia can be fairly strenuous.

      Both the old English system and the Soviet system were fairly regimented and strict, they were highly competitive and encouraged academic excellence, they didn't ``pamper'' the student to the same extent as modern american/european systems do. One might say america or europe has less _need_ to go back to the old days anymore.

    4. Re:Enough with the stereotypes! by TheGeneration · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You're kidding right? The Indians don't have a knack for programming anymore than anybody else. In fact, I'd say generally their code is substandard. In India though you can throw 20 coders at a problem for the price of one American Software Engineer. There in lies the benefit of hiring Indians in India.

      --


      The Generation
      I'd say something witty here, but I'm not that bright.
    5. Re:Enough with the stereotypes! by taeric · · Score: 1

      I wasn't trying to promote stereotypes. I apologize if it sounded that way. Instead, I think I was just roughly saying what you did in your last paragraph. We shouldn't be trying to give them computers because we think they are the solution to all problems. Instead, we should give them what they need.

      Now, if it turns out that that is a computer, so be it. But, I am tired of seeing the computer touted as the solution to world hunger.

      -josh

    6. Re:Enough with the stereotypes! by rjha94 · · Score: 1

      well, i am writing this long mail because i have just come from a long tour of north india at the peak of summer through heat , dust and dehydration. First to the nationalists, the most often quoted line is ' Since india is such a big country, you can not ignore even the small percentages which is in big and small cities and which is largely responsible for the big outgrowth of cybercafes/internet centers with charges like 20 bucks ( 50 cents) for 1 hr surfing. people in places like engineering , medical colleges and uiversities etc etc. And if you look at this number obviously we have a very large crowd ( let;s say switzerland/ australia ?)
      However, the fact remains that a very big portion of this very big country housing very many people is plain ignorant of internet and don;t give a damn. They are fighting for basic infrastructure , power/roads/water. Have you been to villages ? real small cities ? Idea of having a simputer is not bad, but it can only be seen as a logical progession of infrastructure facilities. In my view Computer/Communication can also be thought of as some component of 'infrastructure' and as such it is not needed for existence of this score of millions of people, their urgent priorities are elsewhere. As such the 'concept of a simputer' is fine, but it is something an indian farmer can do without.
      While for news clippings and TV coverage this makes a great story, (Farmers trading with help of technology in xyz Area of India) fact remains that No Body needs it at that level where satisfying basic requirements for living itself is a huge task.
      probably i would like to own a simputer for my 'needs' but not the farmer in himalayan hinterland who had to fetch water from 5 kms. probably put lots of games on it and distribute it to village kids , that is the only possible use i see in villages.

      --
      No .sig
    7. Re:Enough with the stereotypes! by Archie+Steel · · Score: 2

      Yes, it's probably true that for the farmers (who still make up 80% of the population, IIRC) computers are not a basic necessity, and that they are only part of the infrastructure. My point was, however, that we cannot decide what indeed they do need or want. Likewise, VCRs and TVs are not essential commodities, and yet they are ubiquitous in India (though not every family owns one). I'm sure having half a dozen computers for each village would prove to be useful, if only to keep abreast of local and national news, as well as help stay in touch with expatriates through e-mail and generally serve as an educational tool for children. As a recent experiment showed, even Delhi slum kids can learn to use a computer by themselves...In the modern world, knowing how to use a computer is becoming as important as knowing how to read (notice the expression "computer-literate"). Would you say that these farmers don't need to know how to read? Certainly it is not necessary for their livelihood - but as human beings it can only help to widen their horizons.

      --

      Reminder: find a new sig
  26. Computing for the poor an oxymoron? by greensquare · · Score: 2

    I just can't buy it.

    I don't believe that this simputer effort even makes sense. Their are a lot of people here in USA that could afford a computer if they needed or wanted one, but don't have one, because they are not necessary.

    It is hoped that the villagers who would use a shared simputer could afford to buy their own $2 smart card. How will those same villagers be able to afford the $5 worth of batteries that this thing is going to burn through 2 or 3 times a week, or even daily under heavy use?

    What problem is the the the simputer going to solve for the poor Indian? Balance his checkbook? address book? Notepad? calculator? calendar? Surf the net on a QVGA screen? ( is their a phone? ) spreadsheet? database? email?

    I can't see it..

    ]

    1. Re:Computing for the poor an oxymoron? by Twylite · · Score: 2

      Computers are, surprisingly, less necessary in an environment where there is a higher literacy rate. Computers, unlike books or pencil and paper, can teach literacy. This is probably the most critical application in underdeveloped countries.

      As for the problems it will solve: #1. Communication. This is far less obvious that it may seem, but many poor people spend an enormous amount of their annual income on communication, primarily to stay in contact with loved ones who have moved to cities (in search of an income / better living). It is painfully obvious that e-mail is orders of magnitude cheaper than long-distance phone calls; something that many "operators" take their cut for along the line (most often an enterprising shop owner pays ridiculous bribes to get a telephone installed, and then passes that cost along to the consumers ...).

      Access to knowledge bases is also important. Medical knowledge is often sorely lacking in rural areas. For literate adults, a source of educational information is also important.

      Technology can be used to improve quality of life, not just as a passtime for the rich.

      --
      i-name =twylite [http://public.xdi.org/=twylite], see idcommons.net
    2. Re:Computing for the poor an oxymoron? by pankajsethi · · Score: 0

      Betteries don't cause $5 in India. They cost less then a dollar. Also you can buy rechargable AA batteries for a little more then $3.

  27. Perhaps.... by TibbonZero · · Score: 1, Troll

    Perhaps the gov't should just fine Worldcom ? billion dollars (that they misreported), and fund a free computer program for the poor...

    --
    Tibbon
    tibbon.com
    1. Re:Perhaps.... by negacao · · Score: 0

      Gubbmint moderation is almost never the answer, least of all in this case.
      Go ahead and fine Worldcom, but give that money to the people who lost it, no one else.

  28. Can you say? by realmolo · · Score: 0

    X-Box? The thing is a computer (fairly powerful one, actually), and it sells for $200. Of course, there really isn't an operating system for it yet....

    1. Re:Can you say? by $0+31337 · · Score: 0

      PS2? The thing is a computer (fairly powerful one, actually), and it sells for $200. And yeah, it has a linux operating system if so desired.

    2. Re:Can you say? by realmolo · · Score: 0

      The PS2 would be fine, but the X-Box has a hard drive included in the price.

  29. Sim-Puter woes by El_Smack · · Score: 2, Insightful


    The really do have troubles.
    First, a tornado hit the factory. Then the workers rioted because local taxes are so high. As soon as that got fixed, the earthquake hit. What could possibly happen next, an alien invasion?!?!

    --


    There are 01 kinds of cars in the world. The General Lee, and everything else.
  30. Alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are other alternatives to bridging the digital divide. There are many organizations out there that are recycling computers and selling them for $200 and that includes training.

    Now if only the organizations would worry less about competition for computers and more about cooperation, we might be able to really bridge this gap.

  31. digital divide my a$$ by BigChigger · · Score: 0

    people need clean water, food, a home and clothing more than they need a computer. That's where we should put money, not some PeeCee so peopl can play solitaire.

    BC

  32. Gates Charity Foundation by Salsaman · · Score: 2
    Hmmm...isn't this just the kind of thing Gates's charity foundation should be supporting ?

    Oh, but of course, this thing will run Linux, and we can't be helping people like that, can we.

    1. Re:Gates Charity Foundation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's real easy to spend other people's money, isn't it? How much have you contributed to charities with either time or money? That's what I thought. Go snarf a frappachino.

    2. Re:Gates Charity Foundation by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

      Hmmm...isn't this just the kind of thing Gates's charity foundation should be supporting ?
      Oh, but of course, this thing will run Linux, and we can't be helping people like that, can we.


      You're right - perhaps ESR should underwrite this project. When the entire Linux community/industry (call it what you will) has made as many philanthropic donations as the Gates Foundation has, let me know. Here's a hint: I don't think it will be for a long time.

    3. Re:Gates Charity Foundation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Linux "community/industry" has already given away more than the Gates Foundation ever will in the form of software that will be available for use / modification for entire lifetimes to come. The Gates Foundation gives away software that is at best good for 5 years or less.

    4. Re:Gates Charity Foundation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not software he's talking about, its
      medicine and research money and food and other
      necessities of life that the Gates foundation
      funds, not just software. G. himself has said
      it does no good to even give these people access
      to the Internet or high tech if they don't have
      basic needs such as food and health care met
      first.

  33. Plain Insulting..some of these comments are.. by cOdEgUru · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ok people, Lets get the friggin facts straight.

    Despite what Western media and half of what Texas believes, India is not swarmed with people deprived of their basic needs. Although there are still parts of the country where people are under poverty, there are parts of the country where the community is much advanced. Heck! the state that I am originally from (look it up on National Geographic - as "Kerala" was named as the one of the best 50 places to visit), the literacy rate is 100%. Can any other place in the world claim the same ?

    Rants aside, the Simputer was intended to help Govt employees, and employees of other corporations who had to send these people out to the remote areas of the country to educate and to help these people. You cant send them out to the far corners of the state with a notebook and a pen. You need them to have access to information, the same information that you would ultimately provide to the people who never had it. Understandably, food and clothing and a roof above your head are the basic amenities.

    So please, if you really wanna know more about this country that you are so ignorant about, take a trip. Fsck the trip guides, ask someone who had been there, and take the untread path, and discover the heart of this beautiful country.

    And while you are at it, dont miss out on my little South Indian state, learn more about it here

    1. Re:Plain Insulting..some of these comments are.. by pgpckt · · Score: 2

      Heck! the state that I am originally from (look it up on National Geographic - as "Kerala" was named as the one of the best 50 places to visit), the literacy rate is 100%. Can any other place in the world claim the same ?

      Vatican City, a.k.a. The Holy See, immediatly comes to mind. See here.

      --
      Lawrence Lessig is my personal hero.
    2. Re:Plain Insulting..some of these comments are.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "as 'Kerala' was named as the one of the best 50 places to visit"

      -- keyword "visit".

    3. Re:Plain Insulting..some of these comments are.. by txdadu · · Score: 1

      Methinks CodeGuru works for the Keralatourism board.

      Seriously, it is a valid point. Sure parts of India are very poor, however it is not true of the entire country.

    4. Re:Plain Insulting..some of these comments are.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dont worry, they wouldnt let you stay anyway..

    5. Re:Plain Insulting..some of these comments are.. by RoshanCat · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ok people, Lets get the friggin facts straight.

      Yep lets do that shall we?. If a country has more than 70% living in poverty conditions, it is considered to be poor. 10% borders an exception than a rule. Just because there are rich people living in Somalia, Ethiopia doesn't mean those countries are not poor.

      It also helps to check the median salaries of various countries, before shooting someone's mouth off.

      Also literacy means poeple can recognize certain symbols as certain sounds. It Doesn't mean people will actually read books are even get an education.

      100% literacy is used only for govt employees to get a raise or boast during their appraisal. It doesn't mean a squat if they dont utilise it.

      Kerala could be a beautiful state, so are thousands of other states around this world

      Fighting FUD with FUD is defintely not a solution

      Cheers,
      Roshan

    6. Re:Plain Insulting..some of these comments are.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We see even though you read slashdot, your spelling hasnt improved.

      Hence you seem to be illiterate.

      move on noobie..

    7. Re:Plain Insulting..some of these comments are.. by TrumpetPower! · · Score: 3, Informative

      Blockquoth the cOdEgUru:

      Heck! the state that I am originally from (look it up on National Geographic - as "Kerala" was named as the one of the best 50 places to visit), the literacy rate is 100%. Can any other place in the world claim the same ?

      Interestingly enough, Cuba can. According to the CIA, the total population literacy is 95.7%

      Cuba is exactly the sort of place I'd expect the Simputer would do wonderfully. Many of its citizens have close ties with Americans--Americans with money. Education is one of the few things the Cuban government got right--very right. (Their medical system isn't that bad. What it lacks in sophistication and material supplies it make up with truly universal coverage with a strong emphasis on preventative measures, or true health maintenance.) Cubans have the skills to put computing to good use and the potential access to computers through those who escaped to America.

      Now, all we need is to lift the embargo....

      b&

      P.S. Communisim is terrible. The Cuban people deserve a representative government and a leader other than Castro. Heck, even true Communisim would be a huge step up from what they have now. That the Cuban people have done as well as they have is a testament to their strength. Lifting the embargo would go a long ways towards destabilizing the Castro regime to the point where a replacement is practical. b&

      --
      All but God can prove this sentence true.
    8. Re:Plain Insulting..some of these comments are.. by cOdEgUru · · Score: 2

      Interestingly,

      Kerala were the only state in India who had a communist govt soon after independence.

      I believe Communists were ruling the state even before they arrived in Cuba.

      I am not flaming here, but I believe the literacy being 100% had a lot to do with having Communists in power. Basically because, when they first came in to power, all they had were the grassroots movement and empowering them was the first thing the communist party did. I know shit happened from then on (Communists went the capitalist way), but in the beginning they were really about freedom of choice and power to the people.

    9. Re:Plain Insulting..some of these comments are.. by minus_273 · · Score: 1

      Singapre has 100 % literacy along with several states in europe

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    10. Re:Plain Insulting..some of these comments are.. by minus_273 · · Score: 1

      west bengal is also communist.. and certain parts like Indian occupied kashmir,bihar, Indian occupied nagaland, indian occupied nepal(western nepal)are lawless

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    11. Re:Plain Insulting..some of these comments are.. by Dahan · · Score: 2
      Despite what Western media and half of what Texas believes, India is not swarmed with people deprived of their basic needs. Although there are still parts of the country where people are under poverty, there are parts of the country where the community is much advanced.

      Oh, good going there... try to fight stereotypes with some of your own, huh? Despite what you believe, Texas is not full of ignorant hicks. In any case, your first sentence doesn't necessarily follow from your second. 35% of Indians are below the poverty line. And with a population of about 1 billion, that's 350 million people in poverty. Sure, parts of the country is quite advanced, but that doesn't change the fact that a significant percentage, and an even more significant number of the population live in poverty.

      ... the literacy rate is 100%. Can any other place in the world claim the same ?

      How about Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden? (Okay, so Sweden is "only" 99%). Those are all estimates though; I doubt if the literacy rate is really 100% in any country (or state).

      P.S. Speaking of facts, the Census of India says that the literacy rate in Kerala is 91%. Very good, certainly, but a bit short of your 100% claim.

    12. Re:Plain Insulting..some of these comments are.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Singapore does..

      Apparently you do not!

      Singapre Singapore

      IDIOT!!

    13. Re:Plain Insulting..some of these comments are.. by pinkfit · · Score: 1
      I lived in Kerala for six months and have a lifelong obsession with it (particularly the wonderfully unique music). I agree it is one of the world's most magical places (it also has the only palindromic language - Malayalam).

      But it has long been one of India's poorest states - it is remarkable that the literacy is so high, and education is so good.

      It is a perfect testing ground for the Simputer, as Malayalis are so adventurous and keen to embrace new things.

    14. Re:Plain Insulting..some of these comments are.. by pinkfit · · Score: 1

      In Kerala's case, literacy does mean reading. The sale of books in Kerala is the highest in India (a very bookish nation).

    15. Re:Plain Insulting..some of these comments are.. by cOdEgUru · · Score: 2

      Nice to see someone who shares the same passion. Is there something I can help you with ? Getting more of that wonderful unique music might be one way. Or sending a couple of that hot and heavy recipes might be another.

      But then again, you might be another Keralite for all I know :)

    16. Re:Plain Insulting..some of these comments are.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kerala, like other communist places, manages to do a good job educating it's people. Not sure that it's a great place for any sort of business than tourism though. How many months was the last government strike? And if you do not observe the calls for general strikes you face harassment and violence.
      Even though Kerala has decent standards of living, they represent a tiny fraction of the Indian population. Please don't get indignant when people act like Indians are mostly poor or that farming is a common occupation. Two thirds of the Indian population works in agriculture.

    17. Re:Plain Insulting..some of these comments are.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Despite what Western media and half of what Texas believes
      Sounds like you, yourself have a stereotype for western culture. So don't be so insulted when you are just doing the same thing...lol

    18. Re:Plain Insulting..some of these comments are.. by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 0
      35% [cia.gov] of Indians are below the poverty line. And with a population of about 1 billion, that's 350 million people in poverty. Sure, parts of the country is quite advanced, but that doesn't change the fact that a significant percentage, and an even more significant number of the population live in poverty.
      That also means that 650 million people are living above the poverty line... more than the population of the US, Europe and Japan put together.
  34. Re:Oh please this has nothing to do with poverty ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree much of India has surpassed some of the East European countries ( Romania for example ) They even have their own semi Ebayish site http://www.bazee.com

  35. Not a problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is why you move in a family next door and give them a geeky kid. You then play around with the various object makers and such and have him whip you up a custom box for less cost.

    I suppose with the expansions, you could even add a totally customized delivery service from some multinational.. I mean, I remember seeing an addon for 'Clown Capturers', so hey.

  36. Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Perhaps the gov't should just fine Worldcom ? billion dollars (that they misreported),

    Well, because they misreported it, that means they don't have the money! They're going to be filing for bankruptcy soon. You can't get blood out of a stone.

  37. Someone's got it... by TibbonZero · · Score: 1

    Hey, they put the money somewhere (CEO's wallet, CFO's Ferarri, CFO's 24.5 million dollar house). It's somewhere, just they don't know where I guess..

    --
    Tibbon
    tibbon.com
    1. Re:Someone's got it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's somewhere

      No, it's not. WorldCom booked expenses as capital spending.

      If you're a novice in accounting and don't understand what that means, the best analogy is probably here: "It is like someone selling a used car and including in its value all the gasoline he pumped into the vehicle since he bought it."

    2. Re:Someone's got it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks, thats a really great analogy.

  38. offtopic: re: your sig by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 1

    - Fight Palladium with the Great OS Freeze: tell your friends who won't switch to Linux to stick with Win2k or Win98

    the OS Freeze only works until Microsoft doesn't release DirectX 9.0 or IE 7.0 on Windows 2000 or Windows 98, for purely "technical" reasons, yeah. if my friends (heck, if my DAD) can't play the games they want to play, or visit the website they want to visit (hotmail only working for IE 7.0 rings a bell as a future step once IE 7.0 support is not happening for Win2k or Win98) they will "upgrade" to XP.

    as for myself, I won't be upgrading from Win2k, as I don't really play fancy games or visit fancy websites.

    --
    MORTAR COMBAT!
  39. Thank god the scam didn't work by RoshanCat · · Score: 1

    What were the advantages of Simputer anyway?

    Does it have economies of scale like PC has? Two years from now, would it have competed with $200 PC's?

    Does it have a familiar interface needed to succeed in a mass market?

    And why does anyone have to spend money to install simputer access points?

    How much money is needed to support its infrastructure, support, distribution, customer service, things which PC's already have streamlined?

    The whole basic idea of a hand-held is for personal use & easy mobility. If it were to be 'installed' at fixed points & 'shared' among various users, why cant you use a PC for that?

    Why wasn't money spent on installing PC's & training for poor to use the PC's instaed of some Linux zealots who thought they had some cool idea.

    It is time for the govt to stop funding these ponzie schemes & concentrate on providing technology for the masses

    SImputer is definitely not one of them, never was & never will be.

    Cheers,
    Roshan

    1. Re:Thank god the scam didn't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This Coward agrees with Roshan...
      you can buy a pc for 300 today from walmart... in the very near future you may be paying 100 or less...

  40. Who fucking cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, I'm having "financial issues" as well. Anyone care to send me some money?

  41. OT Re: Plain Insulting..some of these comments are by Kenny+Austin · · Score: 1

    All off topic of course.

    >(look it up on National Geographic - as "Kerala" was named as the one of the best 50 places to visit), the literacy rate is 100%. Can any other place in the world claim the same ?

    As far as being one of the best 50, I bet 49 other places can claim that. Literacy rate? I don't have any numbers to support it, but I'm guessing that Sealand has 100% (could be 50%).

    Okay, I'm just fooling around.

    Kenny

  42. Which spin on the situation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    This was an interesting contrast to this story from just 10 days back. The problems remain the same, but the spin is totally different. Since manufacturing doesn't run on internet time, it is hard to conclude which one to belive.

  43. Re:OT Re: Plain Insulting..some of these comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I forgive you, since you are from Oklahoma..

    Are there any people left there, I thought all it had were white trash folks living in trailer parks..

    Oops..now thats biased..aint it ??

  44. The Poor Man's Computer by elocutio · · Score: 1

    Q: What do you call a computer that sells for under $10?

    A: An abacus.

  45. some clarifications by tanveer1979 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I belong to the same sity as the simputer, and have been in touch with the progress. Firstly i think a lot of slashdotters are confusing the meaning of third world countries. A third world does country like india does not mean that everybody lives barefoot and goes hungry. Basically the concept here is that for the middle class ie people haveing one car 2 kids who goto school and comfortable life *cannot* afford PDA's because when we convert Dollers to Rupees 1000 Dollars menas 50000 Rs. In India somebody earning 50000 Rs/pm is in the upper class. So currently not only for poor even for middle class and cooperative societies that is steep. The $200 simputer will basically enable cooprative societies to manage their records, order stuff etc. Currently in some places, in the rural areas the internet is used to send request to companies to order products For example in a village in andhra when the farmers have a sufficent quantity of milk they send a email that the vehicle can come and pick up the stocks. This is a very rudimentry examply cheap computer will enable such things on a larger scale. Also it will benifit students who have the basic necessities but cannot afford such things. This is a small step. Maybe this will lead to cheaper computing that will be good for all, developed or underdeveloped

    --
    My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
    FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
  46. Ironies aside... by bsdparasite · · Score: 1
    The thing to appreciate is the thought of making something for the common man. In a land of myriad languages, swapping a "Sim" card and getting the language of your choice, is priceless. Looking at the market opportunity, there is potential, but given the market conditions, I am not surprised no one is investing.

  47. Why not sell a collector's addition? by cpuffer_hammer · · Score: 2

    A low serial number, special case, or cover at a premium price. I would consider paying more to have an early one and to help lower the price. The extra cash could go to lowering the price in the Indian market, and by getting the early runs out of the way the price could also drop. Also experienced Linux users could be more helpful in the programming debug process.

  48. There may be setbacks to the Simputer, but... by altgrr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...this article from the BBC details a different approach to the problem of taking computers to the masses - make the internet accessible through one person, who goes round villages on a motorbike with a laptop which has some pre-downloaded web pages at the villagers' request.

    It seems a strange concept: you might think that the things the article mentions the service being used for (local news, crop prices, government forms etc) were already catered for through newspapers and the postal system. But then I don't live out in a rural village in India, so I wouldn't know.

    What both this and the Simputer project show, is that there is demand for such a service, regardless of whether or not we, who are totally isolated from the situation, think there is.

    --


    Like car accidents, most hardware problems are due to driver error.
  49. seems like it would be easier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    --seems like it would be a lot easier to take the millions of scrap older computers that exist already, put on a stripped down but totally functional version of linux on them, and ship them to India at real cheap rates. There already exist these old 286's, 386, 486 ands earlier pentiums and on up by the zillion.

    Now IF one of the big distro dealers was to jump on that bandwagon, at least provide the installation disks in some quantity so that the indian techs could set up assembly lines for the install over there, they would have ONE BILLION PEOPLE over in India think they were cool guys. Offer them at straight cost, get some SERIOUS market share going. Cd-r's are just not that expensive to pump out, and every single cd-r could install hundreds or thousands of machines readily. let the indians do the work.

  50. Screwed Up Prioirites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me get this straight- India has 1bn + people, with many areas w/out running water, access to health care, education, etc, and they're worried about making sure everyone has a COMPUTER? If you're sick, can't eat, and can't read, what good is a computer going to do? Personal computers are a luxury item, not a neccessity. It's more important that people have food to eat, clean water and a sewage system, health care, and education (literacy), than making sure they all have computers.

  51. UGH Is this out of Atlas Shrugged? by TheGeneration · · Score: 1

    This is like Ayn Rand's wet dream. If she were alive right now she'd be pointing at this company and screaming that it proves her point about Humanitarian buisinesses. OF COURSE THIS WAS GOING TO FAIL. Selling computers to the poor, and only to the poor? Where's the profit motive? Where's the money that is going to support this buisiness?

    --


    The Generation
    I'd say something witty here, but I'm not that bright.
    1. Re:UGH Is this out of Atlas Shrugged? by pinkfit · · Score: 1

      Not much of a lefty are you.

  52. 100 percent literacy by Jasn · · Score: 1

    Iceland's literacy rate is 100 percent.

  53. Cuba ? by paranoic · · Score: 1

    the literacy rate is 100%. Can any other place in the world claim the same ?
    Cuba, maybe?

  54. It's tough in the real world by jamesl · · Score: 1

    They are pricing this product slightly above a simple Palm handheld. They claim functionality somewhere between the Palm OS and Linux (or maybe Pocket PC?). And people wonder why there is no funding available? It would be more cost effective to buy a boatload of Palms or Visors, give them away and let the professors write applications for those.

  55. Computers Need Electricity. by TheGeneration · · Score: 1

    Many of you seem to have forgotten this very important fact: Computers need RELIABLE electricity.

    Most of the people in the world do NOT have electricity flowing into their home/village. If they do have it than the electricity is not reliable (outtages, surges, brownouts, etc...)

    This just won't work until these socities evolve to the point where they can support the computers with a solid infrastructure

    --


    The Generation
    I'd say something witty here, but I'm not that bright.
    1. Re:Computers Need Electricity. by xof · · Score: 1

      It seems that there is a lot of electricity in India :-)

      However, I am not at ease with all that Simputer stuff. There is much hype, but what's behind?

      It looks too closed to succeed. You have to licence a 'design' which is not much more than an Arm-chip Application Note. All seems one-way (there seems to be no forum, no call for participation, just a couple of guys trying to exploit the (nice) idea of 'a computer for the poor', no SourceForge community, nand OpenHardware one or the likes. If you look at the Google/Open_Source/Simputer directory, it is just hype, there is no forum, no CVS repository.
      When you look at Simputer.org, there is no activity (the pages are ages old) and it links you to similarily dead 'commercial' pages (where people don't answer when you ask for information).

      Why not just start from a LART or one of the existing LinuxDevices?

      Don't get me wrong. I'd be pleased to see a Simputer succeeds, but when you start by asking money for a 'class-room design' with no community support, I am not sure that 'a computer for the poor' is more than an empty dream.

  56. Not gonna happen by Skarstedt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While a noble initiative, this won't work. "Rural" folks don't need computers. They've gotten along without them just fine before now, why mess with them? As far as I know, there is no killer app that would make an Indian subsistence farmer ache to have access to a computer. When a killer app comes along, some enterprising company will then fill the market need. And there will be no need for a group of academics to shove the things down "Rural" folk's throats.

  57. More path of resistance by r_j_prahad · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There are other problems that will happen as Simputer wretsles its way into market. First, Microsoft is very popular in India, not important why. Second, and much important, is the problem of corruption. To reach the sales goals for a $200 system, Simputer are going to have to have political friends, and that I just cannot see happening. Corruption is so ingrained in Indian government there are even special laws to address it. Microsoft is not unique, just uniquely wealthy.

  58. stupid idea by minus_273 · · Score: 1

    it was a stupid idea in the first place and i give you reasons why
    1. 200 was waaaay to expensive. Goto amazon and you will see a mid range mono-chrome ipaq is only $15 with rebate
    2. How likely is that a illiterate person will use a computer. Im sorry but there are more importsnt things.
    3. The money spent on this could easily feed/educate millions
    4. Technologically inferior. It doesnt run palm or windows. Sory but the linux i tried on my hand held wasnt all that great.

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
  59. On the contrary, its the only road to salvation by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 0

    You can't build a nation by focussing solely on the most basic needs. Sure, everyone needs to be fed, and everyone needs to be eduated. But technology is the only way to step out of the "underdeveloped nation" mould. Areas like pharmaceuticals or aerospace need millions or billions of dollars to be sunk in before any payback is seen. Software companies on the other hand can be started in one's basement, and grow dramatically from there... It may surprise you to know that 32 of the 45 software companies worldwide to be certified at SEI-CMM level 5 are based in India, and software is now among India's largest exports today, accounting for 33% in all. India's software exports have been growing at about 45% anually since 1991.

  60. Open source hardware design? Lateral thinking? by pieterh · · Score: 2

    Perhaps this is redundant, given that the 'standard PC' is pretty much a public standard, but perhaps another way of building cheap computers is to evolve a good open source hardware design that can be assembled from cheap components, and which GNU/Linux will be guaranteed to run on. The economies of scale will then work to keep costs down.
    We should be aiming at a $100 computer that approaches the power of a P100.
    To all those people who say: give people clean water and education before gadgets, I'd point out that information equals money, and computers used in the right way (like cars, mobile phones, capital, property etc.) are an excellent way of increasing real standards of wealth.
    Lastly, has anyone tried to run anything other than games on something like a Cybiko? It seems to be an excellent (robust and cheap) platform for small hand-held computing.

  61. Simputers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine a Beowolf Cluster of THESE!!!

  62. Original Intent by pagercam2 · · Score: 2

    I remeber reading the original Simputer stuff last year and that had very different goals than those discussed now. People here are discussing if a single poor farmer could afford such a device and would it make his/her life measurable better? The orginal concept as I understood it was that there would be one simputer per town and a farmer could get goverment aid, file paperwork, market (as in vegeatble) prices, receieve email (as in free communications as opposed to pay post) etc....

    In short it was a common shared resource to connect small villages and help provide goverment services that didn't make it out to rural locations. It might start as one per town and as it bacame more usefull (demand raised) it would be one per neighborhood, one per street etc.... . These seem like very realizable goals and it would be either the combined resources of a town or the goverment that would pay (~$200) for the Simputer to enable services and communication with said town.

    This seems like a reasonable goal and one that would actually help small rural villages and with time increase to helping a wide portion not only of the poor or rural but be a standard community device. It would be helpful to any community, even in the US or other "rich" countries. It might replace the phonebook at a payphone, so that the phone listings are always upto date easier to use as it could assume that you are looking for the Bill Smith in this neighborhood rather than all the Bill Smiths in NYC. It could provide info about local stores, resturaunts, movie times etc... or access to communications for the homeless for those traveling (most people want to get email while traveling but don't want to carry 7 lb laptop, 3 lb charger, ......). The use has the best computer technology but most of that is in the form of desktops at homes of those well off, when you're out shopping, vactaioning or whatever, that desktop doesn't get you much, so a public data terminal would be a boost to every segment of the population. My countries in the world have email cafe's in every town, I haven't seen more than a couple anywhere in the US, I'm sure there are out there, but not enough to be able to assume that I could get info while not a t home.

    The local phone companies need to start offering some sort of digital payphone so that I can keep in touch or lookup movie times after dinner etc.... I'd pay $.25 to $.50 just to know if I got new email, there is a huge market out there, everyone is just to afraid to put something in a shared area for fear that it will get vandalized.

  63. Starving in the U.S.? by Ominous+Armed+Cow · · Score: 1
    "A bunch of people in the US find themselves starving as well. Poverty knows no specific culture."

    No one is "starving" in the United States. All poor people in the USA have access to potable water, decent waste disposal and clothing. If they live on the streets it is not for a lack of shelters. As one [perhaps extreme] example, in NYC a homeless person has a right to a bed, such that the city will put them up in a luxery hotel if there is no more room in the shelters.

    Most poor in subsidized housing have a color television, cable, a microwave oven, and refrigeration --if not a game console, a car, and a host of household appliances.

    1. Re:Starving in the U.S.? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, several thousand people in the United States starve to death each year. In fact, the average 'middle class' family is less than 3 paychecks away from being out on the street with nothing to their names. The average 'lower class' family is about 1/2 a paycheck away from living on the streets.

      If it's so easy for the homeless to find shelter, why do so many of them die of exposure each winter.

      Do some basic research before you go spouting off at the mouse.

    2. Re:Starving in the U.S.? by TheGeneration · · Score: 1

      If it's so easy for the homeless to find shelter,

      Because they refuse to utilize the shelter they have been offered. It's not our fault they are homeless. It's not our responsibility to hand hold them through life. I have my own life to worry about.

      --


      The Generation
      I'd say something witty here, but I'm not that bright.
    3. Re:Starving in the U.S.? by Ominous+Armed+Cow · · Score: 1

      Put down the crack pipe. Show me a single picture or story of an individual who starved to death in America which didn't result in some parent or caretaker being charged with manslaughter.

      It doesn't happen here, despite what your government (or is it government school) tells you.

  64. What's the point? by badasscat · · Score: 1

    My $170 Sony Clie can do all the things touted in this Simputer (and more, considering no Simputer software even exists). All of the applications I run are freeware, and there are thousands of them. How is this $200 Simputer with zero developer support and no tangible hardware benefits (to those who would actually be using it) an improvement over my Clie?

    Granted, the ability to run apps in native Indian languages is a big plus. But perhaps these people should try to work with some of the larger hardware and software developers to try to get the Palm OS and some of the more popular apps ported over to their native language rather than trying to start from scratch with an all-new handheld that nobody seems to want?

    It seems to me they're trying to reinvent the wheel here. We already have low-cost handhelds that do everything they're talking about here. All that's needed are some tweaks to tailor them to the Indian market.

  65. Right spirit, Wrong application by shr1n1 · · Score: 1

    I think the spirit or the idea behind Simputer is a right one. A multilingual simple appliance like information gadget that doesn't need a degree in computer scince to operate or use.
    This is a simple information appliance designed to ubiqutious, rugged, simple to use even by semi-literate people. Before anyone starts to flame me, this *can* be achieved using a visual interface.

    But to brand it as a panacea for all the ills that plague Indians is plain wrong. It is not the magic pill that going to cure all the ills that plague Indian rural dweller. Give it him and what is he going to do about it. Check prices ? Good but what benefit does it bring it to him? In that case a cellphone would be more of a killer app that Simputer.

    I think this will be usefull in a Cooperative kind of environment(Farmer's Cooperative, Milk Cooperative etc) where people would get access both to content and the machines.

  66. Re:Heh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    shut up you little bitch

  67. ButYouCantEmailBreadAsAnAttachment.Com by puckhead · · Score: 1

    More high tech solutions for the poor here.

    Creating top-down high-tech solutions for the poor is a good way to keep middle-class civil servants busy. The poor in India will adapt cast-off computer technology to their needs the same way they adapt old cast-off bicycles to carry heavy loads. They are not naturally stupid and are quite capable of determining what is the appropriate technology at the appropriate cost for a given situation.

    --
    Watching Cowboy Bebop in my jammies, eating a bowl of Shreddies.
  68. Open up Simputer Commercial Licensing to Low End by DonWallace · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The Simputer is different enough from established computer platforms that I believe it will require some grass roots efforts to popularize it. I think that allowing some hobbyist electronics companies to produce a Simputer kit would help proliferate the device and probably would cross-fertilize the initiative to develop the computer for poor countries.

    In particular, the licensing terms from simputer.org are unfavorable to very small commercial operations: Any commercial exploitation of the Specifications (whether Simputer or Simputerized) involves a nominal one time payment to the Trust. The payment will be $25,000 for developing countries and $250,000 for developed countries.

    So, what about a smaller kit company in a developed nation, such as Jameco or others? They're almost certainly not going to spend $250K for a Simputer license. But if kit vendors were allowed open access to the plans, specifications, PC board layouts, etc. we could see enough hobbyists building and using Simputers to create a small revolution.

    At least, the royalty should be graduated according to the company's current size and profitability.

    My point: sometimes, drawing a hard line in the sand between "noble" non commercial use and "lowly" commercial exploitation is silly, and I can think of innumerable examples in the world where lack of profit motive and strong armed egalitarianism ruined a market.

  69. Re:Oh please this has nothing to do with poverty ! by mattdm · · Score: 1

    Ah yes, an Ebay-like site: the pinnacle of human culture.

  70. Cellphones lessen search costs by ranchdudes · · Score: 1

    I'd like to clarify the "cellphone increase efficiency" claim made earlier by a poster.

    Cellphones decrease the amount of time needed to communicate something or organize a joint action, like being in the same place at the same time.

    This is important for day laborers as those who need their services will expend less effort in communicating their need to the day laborer. How do you tell a day laborer that you'll need him right now, tonite, or early tomorrow morning? They are unlikely to be at home, don't have a landline phone, and come and go at irregular hours. When you can find a day laborer more easily, you are likely to require his services more often, for jobs which may have been too much trouble to organize before.

    Another example: Often people call each other several times in order to meet in a cafe in the city (I'm running late, let's go to this cafe instead, can't find you, where's that street again), and then wonder how they managed to meet before cellphones. Well, they didn't meet, or they waited. Waiting was particularly common, I think, but cellphones have made this activity more efficient as well.

    1. Re:Cellphones lessen search costs by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      There's no argument that this is true. But I still don't see how it makes any more than an insignificant-- in the grand scheme-- difference in the lives of low-wage, unskilled or marginally skilled workers. Same with a computer. You can hand 'em out for free on the street corner, and it won't do a think to help people.

      I think the whole "simputer" concept is distressingly close to a cargo-cult ritual. Rich people have computers, therefore we will build computers of our own, so we can also be rich! God you takem life bilong mi, and all that.

  71. Weeeeee more breast enhancment spam in non english by panxerox · · Score: 0

    Weeeeee more breast enhancment spam in non english

    --
    "It's so convenient to have a system where everyone is a criminal" - A. Hitler
  72. Possible applications are endless...really by Loge · · Score: 3

    Everytime I think about possible applications for the Simputer, I am reminded of this press release issued a few years ago:

    The Global Village

    KABINDA, ZAIRE--In a move IBM offices are hailing as a major step in the company's ongoing worldwide telecommunications revolution, M'wana Ndeti, a member of Zaire's Bantu tribe, used an IBM global uplink network modem yesterday to crush a nut.

    Ndeti, who spent 20 minutes trying to open the nut by hand, easily cracked it open by smashing it repeatedly with the powerful modem.

    "I could not crush the nut by myself," said the 47-year-old Ndeti, who added the savory nut to a thick, peanut-based soup minutes later. "With IBM's help, I was able to break it." Ndeti discovered the nut-breaking, 28.8 V.34 modem yesterday, when IBM was shooting a commercial in his southwestern Zaire village. During a break in shooting, which shows African villagers eagerly teleconferencing via computer with Japanese schoolchildren, Ndeti snuck onto the set and took the modem, which he believed would serve well as a "smashing" utensil.

    IBM officials were not surprised the longtime computer giant was able to provide Ndeti with practical solutions to his everyday problems. "Our telecommunications systems offer people all over the world global networking solutions that fit their specific needs," said Herbert Ross, IBM's director of marketing. "Whether you're a nun cloistered in an Italian abbey or an Aborigine in Australia's Great Sandy Desert, IBM has the ideas to get you where you want to go today."

    According to Ndeti, of the modem's many powerful features, most impressive was its hard plastic casing, which easily sustained several minutes of vigorous pounding against a large stone. "I put the nut on a rock, and I hit it with the modem," Ndeti said. "The modem did not break. It is a good modem."

    Ndeti was so impressed with the modem that he purchased a new, state-of- the-art IBM workstation, complete with a PowerPC 601 microprocessor, a quad-speed internal CD-ROM drive and three 16-bit ethernet networking connectors. The tribesman has already made good use of the computer system, fashioning a gazelle trap out of its wires, a boat anchor out of the monitor and a crude but effective weapon from its mouse.

    "This is a good computer," said Ndeti, carving up a just-captured gazelle with the computer's flat, sharp internal processing device. "I am using every part of it. I will cook this gazelle on the keyboard." Hours later, Ndeti capped off his delicious gazelle dinner by smoking the computer's 200-page owner's manual.

    IBM spokespeople praised Ndeti's choice of computers. "We are pleased that the Bantu people are turning to IBM for their business needs," said company CEO William Allaire. "From Kansas City to Kinshasa, IBM is bringing the world closer together. Our cutting-edge technology is truly creating a global village."

  73. The web ... it's not just for pr0n anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Weather reports, order status, job offers and searches, distance learning, agricultural advice, group purchasing, etc.

    This is how people are going to be able to afford clean water, roads, etc.: because they can start to become more productive.

  74. Simputer and Illiteracy by bayankaran · · Score: 0

    No one seems to even know what a Simputer looks like?

    I am talking about information being available to the illiterate and the poor. It is not stock quotes and sports news.

    I am talking about price of commodities, may be the weather, some new type of seeds (hope it is not going to be the Monsanto 'death' seeds), rebates, subsidies.

    It is virtually impossible to convey the importance of information for these people. You need think from a different perspective.

    The killer application for fighting illiteracy through internet is yet to be found. Simputer and ventures like that may help in the development.

    --
    Tat Tvam Asi
  75. indian scum steal american jobs! fuck india! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And we all know how fucking shitty any Indian "programmer" is. As soon as you have a problem with shitty Indian code, the programmer stops speaking english, and the body shop that provided him sends him back to India, where you can only talk to him at 3am.
    Like I said, FUCK INDIA.

  76. Hate to ask, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it's so good THERE, why are you HERE?

    1. Re:Hate to ask, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who said he was here (guess you mean in the US, you didn't say where here was)? You do know that they have the internet in other place besides america right? And you can read the same web pages in most other countries.

  77. Solve (3) problems: refurbish our older stuff ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ... that would otherwise go to the landfill and create toxic leaching problems (1).

    Set up refurbishing plants in India, and (2) make jobs there as well as (3) supplying cheap computers.

    Feed the process by prohibiting uncontrolled computer dumping here, but control it so it *does* result in cheap computers, not just toxic junk in India.

  78. Re:GO back to India! NOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Indians get the F**K out, who will do all the programming. Obviously not the extraordinarly dumb Americans!

  79. Re:GO back to India! NOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    99% of all curry-mexicans working in high-tech both here and in India can't program for shit. They spend all day on the phone talking to the 1% that can code, or they try to get whites or asians to do the work for them. Believe me, Indian programmers suck.

  80. Re:GO back to India! NOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    God dammit you fucking dumbass redneck, indians are fucking dot-heads not curry-mexicans. You fucked up even being a racist so just go fucking kill yourself now, real rednecks know the right slur for the right foreign motherfucker. Fuck it you shouldn't even be an American anymore for fucking that up. Go join the....hell, no one would want you, just take a bath with a hairdryer or some shit like that you fucking reject motherfucker.

  81. Simputer and "3rd world" by makanaka · · Score: 1

    I'm disappointed with some Slashdotters' approach to this topic. As a few replies have pointed out, equating the idea of India only with poverty, a backward rural landscape and an absence of most of the infrastructure that you are used to betrays ignorance.

    What is surprising to me is that the people on this board don't know better. There have in the past been a few threads about the outsourcing of coding and s/w projects to India, and these threads have contained some lively discussion about the state of India's IT industry. Surely you don't imagine that this is an industry that exists in a cultural and technological vacuum?

    And don't be too hasty to judge the Simputer and its future. You should also know that it is not meant to be a replacement for the device that you call a PDA. It is not, for its objectives are quite different - they are looking at serving the needs of a large developing country whose population speak a number of languages and which can benefit from making contact under conditions which you would scarcely find yourself.

    Do a little background reading - you can start right here on Slashdot - and you might surprise yourself.

  82. you can but a pc from walmart for 300.00 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you can but a pc from walmart for 300.00
    check it out...