OH really? I interviewed at Netflix for an API Engineering position and had the API Manager tell me that what I had been developing on the side 'fixes alot of what we are having problems with'. They then didn't hire me but invited their entire development team to my talk the next week. I have done a talk at SpringOne 2014, been invited to talk to Mashery's development team twice and am considered the leader in API automation... but can't find work to save my life. Mind you... I'm 45 in the Valley as well.:)
The barest metal web language? seriously? maybe we have a different definition of 'metal'. If you are talking scripting languages, Groovy is going to kill everything because it's based on the JVM, can build Android apps, is used for Gradle builds, Spock and even Grails as well as shell scripting. The only thing it can't do is client side. And if you statically code it, it can even be FASTER than Java at times (believe it or not).
Why do we have to give corporations anything? The US is the one with a friggin army. Go in an sieze the friggin funds and tell them tough fuckin cookies. And at the same time cut back their HB-1 visas and start negotiations. They can either start moving jobs back and hiring LOCAL developers and LOWER C-level wages, or we are going to continue to play hard ball.
You really need to review your history. The open office has been around for centuries, if not millennia.
Yes millenia... we were banging rocks together in open offices called caves. But eventually we became civilized and stopped feeding from open troughs and learned to walk upright too.
Not really. They interview me BECAUSE of my tools and development. They see what I am developing and thats the main reason they want to interview me.
I remember Apples excuse was that they didn't even fully support REST yet. Amazon interviewed me 3 different times, were completely confused and in the end , rejected because I don't have a degree... regardless of the fact I'm a founding team member. PayPal just couldn't find a team to put me on.
As the saying goes, it would be a comedy it it wasn't a tragedy:)
I created API I/O Abstraction, APIObject and API Chaining, show them working in Grails API Toolkit, am developing them out in spring-boot and have been interviewed by Amazon, Apple, Paypal, Netflix, Comcast... literally everyone but Google. But have yet to land a job. Mainly because from what I am told, my work is great but too cutting edge, just what they need but would require a rewrite, fantastic but not in the tools they want, etc etc.
I'm finding you can create tools that will change the world but even if everyone agrees that they would and that they need them, they may not be ready.
Yep this is true. I have stood by this and been harassed by corporations for doing this but said 'If you are going to sue, do it... but you can't be calling me up every night at 3am and not call that harassment'. No one ever sues because they are afraid of those facts being raised before a court and scrutinized. But as long as you stick to FACTS and show no opinion in those facts (treat it as journalism), you are fine.
Thats not the way corporations use it though. Here in the Bay, an Indian corporation was illegally importing Indian workers to do his IT work, Microsoft lays off employees here in the Bay and Seattle and them goes before congress asking for more HB-1 Visas, etc. It's a scam to get cheap foreign labor. And if the labor isn't up to par, they have one US employee training them all knowing he is going to get laid off once he is done.
The silly thing is... they NEVER hold these companies accountable. When have you ever heard Microsoft pushing a patch for Windows early or an extra update merely because a customer was 'upset'. And Redhat is actually pretty bad about support; they only support a VERY SMALL set of very old releases (vs Ubuntu which keeps their releases pretty up to date). The excuse is 'it might break something' which is a pile of BS since it wouldn't be in the core supported repo.
I would laugh if companies actually DID hold companies accountable because then no one would provide support. Its a silly house of cards that I call BULLSHIT on.
No... you blow off all meetings, say you are working from home and then show up three days later with a solution and look like a winner. That way they say 'leave him alone and don't bug him' and have everything run through a project manager.:)
Of course there is blow back when a C-level gets involved
For those who love how Groovy/Grails makes Java less verbose and its convention over configuration approach, I highly recommend Griffon. It can work with Swing, AWT, QT or whatever you want to use and is very clean, simple and easy to understand and is based on tried and true technologies and libraries.
I never made a decision for them. You are making a decison for them when you force it down their throat by installing it on their phone. You make a decision for people when you shove it in their mailbox, or put a pamphlet on their car. Now you make that decision to put in on their phone. I merely say 'let people come to their own conclusions on their own and ask their own questions'. You seem to think people need to have every religion shoved in their face.
Isn't atheism/agnosticism/secular humanism an answer too? in which case. why are you shoving all this other nonsense in their face? They already have a conclusion and you are assuming you need to force yours on them.It is best to assume your anser is right for you and let others come to their own PERSONAL answer.
How is that a false premise? All scientific proofs, arguments, evidence cannot show the existence of a deity and as akhams ravor clearly states, the simplest explanation is often the clearest solution. Religion is self proving and therefore self defeating. Science at least is object in its puruit of truth so it can find real answers whereas religious has no ability to be objective; at the end of the day if they find god does not exist, god will STILL exist.
A knotty problem? which problem is that? the problem that no one asked for bibles in those countries where people are going? The problem that no one asked to be converted? the problem that no one gives a crap about their superstitious ideas and religioun? Indeed... that is a knotty problem that requires us to start brainwashing immediately.
Or java, Groovy/grails, Scala, Python job. I mean seriously, any web dev job is going to be open source as IIS is only 14% of the market and no one does mono on Apche as there's no real argument for it.
Thank you for an (rare) intelligent response and an even more rare modding up one. I for one am intrigued in DART as well because i always wanted a compilable replacement to Javascript so my code wasn't constantly needing to be downloaded and compiled on the fly or was cached for everyone to view and copy. My only bitch is that I effectively have to rebuild chrome in order to try and run DART and do anything with it.
Having played with it, it is very similar to Java's Groovy in alot of ways but the compilation of DART is so much of a pain that it will probably turn off alot of people until it gets built into Chrome. And the sooner the better.
Yeah their response on marijuana was just a blanket statement on ALL drugs stating about an addictive nature and drug rehabilitation; ok then, when are we going to rehabilitate our president for the time he smoked in college or all the senators when they hit the bong at the frat house? When are they all going to be rehabilitated? How about the voting public that never commits crimes to support their marijuana habit... when are they getting rehabilitated? Because, excuse the pun but this seems like a smoke screen. Marijuana is about as addictive as beer and about as harmful but can actual have medical purposes such as helping with anxiety or appetite in cancer patients (or the odd case of glaucoma). Making some sort of blanket stament on drug addiction does not really apply when having a discussion/discourse on marijuana as very few people have to go to Betty Ford for marijuana addiction screwing up their lives or causing them to sell everything they own to get their next ounce of marijuana. Its just a bullshit response
So how about we have a REAL discussion and talk about the REAL reason why... its the same reason you dont want gays to marry because you dont have the balls to make the change. You dont have the courage to commit. You know it doesnt make sense, you all went to college and hit the bong as senators and congressman but now you feel free to be hypocrites when even your constituency knows its harmless.
So what is it going to take to get a serious response especially from someone who smoked and became president??
I jumped onto Macs several years back because they were a nice platform for Java development but over the years I learned alot fo shortcomings that MAC has if you are a Java dev, open source advocate and just as a laptop in general:
1) 8 GB memory limit. This is what they tell you. This is what they support. This is their max in all their software... supposedly. You can look REALLY hard and find places that you can get upgrades to 16GB but if you are doing any VM'ing, graphics and/or heavy processing, 8GB's maxes out quick. And just to tell you how quickly, my wife actually got a new Macbook pro 2 weeks ago with 8GB of memory and it used 5GB with only a web browser open
2) not configurable. You can't change the battery and you can BARELY change the memory. They are working on fixing it so you cant even do that without bringing it in; they are switching to custom screws that no one sells screw drivers for and if you use existing screw drivers, you will strip the screws and make it so you can't fix or change out parts if they are broken.
3) HEAT!!! New mac book pro? 170 degrees in your lap when playing a youtube movie.
4) You dont own your media. Mac wants to index all your media, keep track of it, hunt it down and then make sure it doesn't work with anything if it doesn't recognize it. This isn't 100% true but they are dancing with media companies in that general direction and don't give a crap about consumers.
5) developers/open sources can go get screwed. Apple will gladly kick you off their app store and steal your ideas. Hell, they'll gladly kick you off the app store for arbitrary reasons. They have decided to tell Java developers to go get screwed. Macports breaks happily on updates and upgrades.
So if you are in IT or are a software developer, get a machine that allows you to do software development and just create a Hackintosh as a VM. But if you are a consumer that wants to consume, go grab a Macbook so you can look cool with all your hipster friends before you go out for drinks; I'll be home programming.
Slashdot Mirror
OH really? I interviewed at Netflix for an API Engineering position and had the API Manager tell me that what I had been developing on the side 'fixes alot of what we are having problems with'. They then didn't hire me but invited their entire development team to my talk the next week. I have done a talk at SpringOne 2014, been invited to talk to Mashery's development team twice and am considered the leader in API automation... but can't find work to save my life. Mind you... I'm 45 in the Valley as well. :)
The barest metal web language? seriously? maybe we have a different definition of 'metal'. If you are talking scripting languages, Groovy is going to kill everything because it's based on the JVM, can build Android apps, is used for Gradle builds, Spock and even Grails as well as shell scripting. The only thing it can't do is client side. And if you statically code it, it can even be FASTER than Java at times (believe it or not).
Why do we have to give corporations anything? The US is the one with a friggin army. Go in an sieze the friggin funds and tell them tough fuckin cookies. And at the same time cut back their HB-1 visas and start negotiations. They can either start moving jobs back and hiring LOCAL developers and LOWER C-level wages, or we are going to continue to play hard ball.
You really need to review your history. The open office has been around for centuries, if not millennia.
Yes millenia... we were banging rocks together in open offices called caves. But eventually we became civilized and stopped feeding from open troughs and learned to walk upright too.
You have to sell yourself through your projects.
Not really. They interview me BECAUSE of my tools and development. They see what I am developing and thats the main reason they want to interview me. I remember Apples excuse was that they didn't even fully support REST yet. Amazon interviewed me 3 different times, were completely confused and in the end , rejected because I don't have a degree... regardless of the fact I'm a founding team member. PayPal just couldn't find a team to put me on. As the saying goes, it would be a comedy it it wasn't a tragedy :)
I created API I/O Abstraction, APIObject and API Chaining, show them working in Grails API Toolkit, am developing them out in spring-boot and have been interviewed by Amazon, Apple, Paypal, Netflix, Comcast... literally everyone but Google. But have yet to land a job. Mainly because from what I am told, my work is great but too cutting edge, just what they need but would require a rewrite, fantastic but not in the tools they want, etc etc. I'm finding you can create tools that will change the world but even if everyone agrees that they would and that they need them, they may not be ready.
Yeh and real tech cities like the Bay Area don't use .Net either though. Oracle, Pivotal, Sun, Spring, Groov, Grails... they all dominate here.
Yep this is true. I have stood by this and been harassed by corporations for doing this but said 'If you are going to sue, do it... but you can't be calling me up every night at 3am and not call that harassment'. No one ever sues because they are afraid of those facts being raised before a court and scrutinized. But as long as you stick to FACTS and show no opinion in those facts (treat it as journalism), you are fine.
Thats not the way corporations use it though. Here in the Bay, an Indian corporation was illegally importing Indian workers to do his IT work, Microsoft lays off employees here in the Bay and Seattle and them goes before congress asking for more HB-1 Visas, etc. It's a scam to get cheap foreign labor. And if the labor isn't up to par, they have one US employee training them all knowing he is going to get laid off once he is done.
The silly thing is... they NEVER hold these companies accountable. When have you ever heard Microsoft pushing a patch for Windows early or an extra update merely because a customer was 'upset'. And Redhat is actually pretty bad about support; they only support a VERY SMALL set of very old releases (vs Ubuntu which keeps their releases pretty up to date). The excuse is 'it might break something' which is a pile of BS since it wouldn't be in the core supported repo. I would laugh if companies actually DID hold companies accountable because then no one would provide support. Its a silly house of cards that I call BULLSHIT on.
No... you blow off all meetings, say you are working from home and then show up three days later with a solution and look like a winner. That way they say 'leave him alone and don't bug him' and have everything run through a project manager. :)
Of course there is blow back when a C-level gets involved
Take managers out of the equation and work gets done. Pretty simple.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Fill the room with breasts. Attached to beautiful coeds. You won't hear a thing.
I'm sorry I cant hear you, I have breasts on my ears.
DAMN KIDS! get those breasts off my lawn!
For those who love how Groovy/Grails makes Java less verbose and its convention over configuration approach, I highly recommend Griffon. It can work with Swing, AWT, QT or whatever you want to use and is very clean, simple and easy to understand and is based on tried and true technologies and libraries.
I never made a decision for them. You are making a decison for them when you force it down their throat by installing it on their phone. You make a decision for people when you shove it in their mailbox, or put a pamphlet on their car. Now you make that decision to put in on their phone. I merely say 'let people come to their own conclusions on their own and ask their own questions'. You seem to think people need to have every religion shoved in their face.
Isn't atheism/agnosticism/secular humanism an answer too? in which case. why are you shoving all this other nonsense in their face? They already have a conclusion and you are assuming you need to force yours on them.It is best to assume your anser is right for you and let others come to their own PERSONAL answer.
How is that a false premise? All scientific proofs, arguments, evidence cannot show the existence of a deity and as akhams ravor clearly states, the simplest explanation is often the clearest solution. Religion is self proving and therefore self defeating. Science at least is object in its puruit of truth so it can find real answers whereas religious has no ability to be objective; at the end of the day if they find god does not exist, god will STILL exist.
A knotty problem? which problem is that? the problem that no one asked for bibles in those countries where people are going? The problem that no one asked to be converted? the problem that no one gives a crap about their superstitious ideas and religioun? Indeed... that is a knotty problem that requires us to start brainwashing immediately.
Or java, Groovy/grails, Scala, Python job. I mean seriously, any web dev job is going to be open source as IIS is only 14% of the market and no one does mono on Apche as there's no real argument for it.
What's that?>/a>
I think it's something like Pray for a man and you save him once. Teach him to pray for himself and you save him for a lifetime.
actually its more like 'pray for a man and he easily ignores you, brainwash a man and he will pray with you'
simple answer... no. And groovy is easier to read and code.
Thank you for an (rare) intelligent response and an even more rare modding up one. I for one am intrigued in DART as well because i always wanted a compilable replacement to Javascript so my code wasn't constantly needing to be downloaded and compiled on the fly or was cached for everyone to view and copy. My only bitch is that I effectively have to rebuild chrome in order to try and run DART and do anything with it.
Having played with it, it is very similar to Java's Groovy in alot of ways but the compilation of DART is so much of a pain that it will probably turn off alot of people until it gets built into Chrome. And the sooner the better.
Yeah their response on marijuana was just a blanket statement on ALL drugs stating about an addictive nature and drug rehabilitation; ok then, when are we going to rehabilitate our president for the time he smoked in college or all the senators when they hit the bong at the frat house? When are they all going to be rehabilitated? How about the voting public that never commits crimes to support their marijuana habit... when are they getting rehabilitated? Because, excuse the pun but this seems like a smoke screen. Marijuana is about as addictive as beer and about as harmful but can actual have medical purposes such as helping with anxiety or appetite in cancer patients (or the odd case of glaucoma). Making some sort of blanket stament on drug addiction does not really apply when having a discussion/discourse on marijuana as very few people have to go to Betty Ford for marijuana addiction screwing up their lives or causing them to sell everything they own to get their next ounce of marijuana. Its just a bullshit response So how about we have a REAL discussion and talk about the REAL reason why... its the same reason you dont want gays to marry because you dont have the balls to make the change. You dont have the courage to commit. You know it doesnt make sense, you all went to college and hit the bong as senators and congressman but now you feel free to be hypocrites when even your constituency knows its harmless.
So what is it going to take to get a serious response especially from someone who smoked and became president??
I jumped onto Macs several years back because they were a nice platform for Java development but over the years I learned alot fo shortcomings that MAC has if you are a Java dev, open source advocate and just as a laptop in general: 1) 8 GB memory limit. This is what they tell you. This is what they support. This is their max in all their software... supposedly. You can look REALLY hard and find places that you can get upgrades to 16GB but if you are doing any VM'ing, graphics and/or heavy processing, 8GB's maxes out quick. And just to tell you how quickly, my wife actually got a new Macbook pro 2 weeks ago with 8GB of memory and it used 5GB with only a web browser open 2) not configurable. You can't change the battery and you can BARELY change the memory. They are working on fixing it so you cant even do that without bringing it in; they are switching to custom screws that no one sells screw drivers for and if you use existing screw drivers, you will strip the screws and make it so you can't fix or change out parts if they are broken. 3) HEAT!!! New mac book pro? 170 degrees in your lap when playing a youtube movie. 4) You dont own your media. Mac wants to index all your media, keep track of it, hunt it down and then make sure it doesn't work with anything if it doesn't recognize it. This isn't 100% true but they are dancing with media companies in that general direction and don't give a crap about consumers. 5) developers/open sources can go get screwed. Apple will gladly kick you off their app store and steal your ideas. Hell, they'll gladly kick you off the app store for arbitrary reasons. They have decided to tell Java developers to go get screwed. Macports breaks happily on updates and upgrades. So if you are in IT or are a software developer, get a machine that allows you to do software development and just create a Hackintosh as a VM. But if you are a consumer that wants to consume, go grab a Macbook so you can look cool with all your hipster friends before you go out for drinks; I'll be home programming.