No, people aren't going to stop using fossil fuels as long as it improves their quality of life. And it would be fucking stupid to stop for any other reason.
If you are working around IT then you're probably not qualified to do your job. Because part of your job is working within the requirements of the business. IT's policies are driven by business requirements. Just because you aren't privy to every detail of every decision that has led to the policies in place doesn't mean that there isn't a sound business requirement behind them. Get over yourself.
Way to blame shift. Let me tell you, the cloud providers aren't going to provide SLAs that are any better than what the network providers provide. And what they provide is an agreed upon service availability and if they don't deliver, you can request to not have to pay for that period. Which may or may not actually cover your business loses due to the outage.
This is yet another difference between your IT department and your service provider. Your IT department actually has some idea of the urgency of the issue and what it means to your business. Your service provider only cares what it means to their business.
Business guys go to "the cloud" because they have no idea what IT is about. They have no idea even how to measure IT's performance. They have no idea how to even begin to describe their needs. The only reason they feel positive about "the cloud" is because "the cloud" has a staff that is responsible for nothing but customer care, i.e. sales. And the sales guy brings them a simple menu of services. And if your business is something that can be satisfied from a simple menu of services then let's hope that you are in some line of business that makes an actual physical product. If all you do is provide some kind of information service, then having simple IT needs means that you don't stand out and you're business is doomed.
Even if you want to accept that even a single existing example of some kind of "media" proves that that "media" is not dead, I cannot understand how anyone could possibly hold the idea that for every single type of "media" that ever existed there exists at least one sample. Really?
There is no "three strikes" law at the federal level in the US. There are multiple "three strikes" state level laws. But there are no state level copyright laws. So your post is kind of bs.
No that means that when the engine stops you plummet like a stone to earth. Unlike most helicopters which if they are unpowered and falling, the propellers will spin and provide some possibility of you not dying when you hit the ground. From wikipedia:
In helicopters and autogyros, autorotation refers to generation of lift by the main rotor when it is not being driven by an engine. Should an engine fail, a helicopter may be able to use autorotation lift to slow its descent and land in a controlled manner.
I think I'll trust the Google's opinion about the safety/security/availability of "The Cloud!" when one of two things happens:
1) Google turns out the lights in all their data centers and moves their entire operation into someone else's cloud service.
Or
2) Google is willing to trust their entire existence to the integrity of their cloud service. This means that Sergey, Eric, Larry, and all their employees turn over stock ownership. They hand over the keys to the buildings, the data centers, the networks, the IP, the airplanes, everything the very first time one of their staff sees a bit of data that belongs to a customer.
It's one thing to be able to say "I know the general principles of programming." It's something quite different to say "I am a C/Java/Javascript/Perl developer." Consider the situation where someone who is quite advanced in the the principles of programming, understands algorithms, etc. and they are writing up some javascript and they proceed to implement their own array manipulation methods ignoring that sort, slice, split, concat, etc. are all there for the taking. You've not only wasted a bunch of time, but your javascript versions are slower as the intrinsic methods are implemented in native code.
Regardless of principles and your desire to be a researcher, it actually matters that you know all of the features of the language you are tasked to work with so you don't waste time reinventing the wheel poorly.
You'd need to make sure that the provider is able to buy your business with cash, otherwise all those compliance statements mean nothing when they violate the relevant regulations. The government isn't going to allow you to waive your liability because somebody said they could meet your requirements.
Exactly which "natural rights" are you referring to here? Your right to get the product of someone's labor and investment without paying or something else?
If it's the "natural right" I mentioned, I'd be interested to know how many millions of dollars of your own money you've spent producing content to be given away.
You're absolutely right. Losers shouldn't be allowed to post negatives reviews just because it doesn't meet their unrealistic expectations. Of course the only way this is possible is for there to be zero anonymity and for review sites to refuse reviews that aren't accompanied by multiple forms of corroborating evidence.
I doubt that. My refusal to respond to circumstances outside my control cannot constitute duress, otherwise patients would just say "I only signed in order to get treatment, I would never have agreed to pay this much otherwise."
What amazes me is that people who choose to retaliate with criminal actions, and those who cheer them on, don't seem to be able to anticipate the results of their behavior. Events like this are why network connectivity becomes regulated.
You're probably right. After the initial attacks, the investigators have been there collecting evidence. The difference between Sony being the victim of a crime and the hackers committing crimes has significant ramifications. I expect that there will be a number of people who spend some time getting sodomized in federal prisons around the world followed up by the inability to ever hold a job in the IT industry, ever get any credit, ever hold a job of any trust, or ever accumulate any money as anything they earn over a certain bare minimum will be taken by the courts to pay their multi-million dollar fines.
Not to mention the possibility of some back alley arrangements leading to some real bodily harm in countries with less robust legal systems.
Don't forget the possibility that you may already have UID's of 1000 on your systems. So simply doing the find commands that several people have recommended is asking for some asshurt.
If they were concerned about the carbon footprint couldn't they have just bought the offsets and stayed home? Actually the whole idea of carbon offsets is just bullshit. I wonder if they worry about a new era Martin Luther who will show what a mockery their Indulgences really are?
Even more to the point, how exactly is their whereabouts being tracked this way any different than their effort of tracking and selling the activities of every single person who ever uses the internet? Seems perfectly fine to me for them to have their travels publicized and mocked as appropriate.
There is Ghz spectrum between say, 2.4 and 3.4 Ghz, which seems limited. So you might break it out into 1 mhz bands, giving you 1,000 usable frequencies. Or break it more finely,into.1 mhz bands giving you 10,000 usable, or.01 giving you 100,000 frequencies, or...
Before you continue slicing your frequencies into narrow and narrow bands, maybe you should look up how much bandwidth 10 KHz will provide for data communications. It'll surprise you.
Slashdot Mirror
Move? He'd be lucky if that's all that happens. He's unlikely to ever get a job of any significance again. Would you want this guy working for you?
No, people aren't going to stop using fossil fuels as long as it improves their quality of life. And it would be fucking stupid to stop for any other reason.
If you are working around IT then you're probably not qualified to do your job. Because part of your job is working within the requirements of the business. IT's policies are driven by business requirements. Just because you aren't privy to every detail of every decision that has led to the policies in place doesn't mean that there isn't a sound business requirement behind them. Get over yourself.
Way to blame shift. Let me tell you, the cloud providers aren't going to provide SLAs that are any better than what the network providers provide. And what they provide is an agreed upon service availability and if they don't deliver, you can request to not have to pay for that period. Which may or may not actually cover your business loses due to the outage.
This is yet another difference between your IT department and your service provider. Your IT department actually has some idea of the urgency of the issue and what it means to your business. Your service provider only cares what it means to their business.
Business guys go to "the cloud" because they have no idea what IT is about. They have no idea even how to measure IT's performance. They have no idea how to even begin to describe their needs. The only reason they feel positive about "the cloud" is because "the cloud" has a staff that is responsible for nothing but customer care, i.e. sales. And the sales guy brings them a simple menu of services. And if your business is something that can be satisfied from a simple menu of services then let's hope that you are in some line of business that makes an actual physical product. If all you do is provide some kind of information service, then having simple IT needs means that you don't stand out and you're business is doomed.
Even if you want to accept that even a single existing example of some kind of "media" proves that that "media" is not dead, I cannot understand how anyone could possibly hold the idea that for every single type of "media" that ever existed there exists at least one sample. Really?
There is no "three strikes" law at the federal level in the US. There are multiple "three strikes" state level laws. But there are no state level copyright laws. So your post is kind of bs.
It's also a great way to launder money.
Yes, watch slashdot externalize costs and internalize profits.
No that means that when the engine stops you plummet like a stone to earth. Unlike most helicopters which if they are unpowered and falling, the propellers will spin and provide some possibility of you not dying when you hit the ground. From wikipedia:
I think I'll trust the Google's opinion about the safety/security/availability of "The Cloud!" when one of two things happens:
1) Google turns out the lights in all their data centers and moves their entire operation into someone else's cloud service.
Or
2) Google is willing to trust their entire existence to the integrity of their cloud service. This means that Sergey, Eric, Larry, and all their employees turn over stock ownership. They hand over the keys to the buildings, the data centers, the networks, the IP, the airplanes, everything the very first time one of their staff sees a bit of data that belongs to a customer.
Or, you know, POTS. The doorbell isn't mobile, it is not going anywhere.
It's one thing to be able to say "I know the general principles of programming." It's something quite different to say "I am a C/Java/Javascript/Perl developer." Consider the situation where someone who is quite advanced in the the principles of programming, understands algorithms, etc. and they are writing up some javascript and they proceed to implement their own array manipulation methods ignoring that sort, slice, split, concat, etc. are all there for the taking. You've not only wasted a bunch of time, but your javascript versions are slower as the intrinsic methods are implemented in native code.
Regardless of principles and your desire to be a researcher, it actually matters that you know all of the features of the language you are tasked to work with so you don't waste time reinventing the wheel poorly.
You'd need to make sure that the provider is able to buy your business with cash, otherwise all those compliance statements mean nothing when they violate the relevant regulations. The government isn't going to allow you to waive your liability because somebody said they could meet your requirements.
Or you could not buy the product. Every price is reached by two parties agreeing, not by one party deciding and the other being coerced to pay.
Exactly which "natural rights" are you referring to here? Your right to get the product of someone's labor and investment without paying or something else?
If it's the "natural right" I mentioned, I'd be interested to know how many millions of dollars of your own money you've spent producing content to be given away.
Ship yourself via overnight air.
Since you started the game, are you posting as a doctor or lawyer? Or are you the idiot?
You're absolutely right. Losers shouldn't be allowed to post negatives reviews just because it doesn't meet their unrealistic expectations. Of course the only way this is possible is for there to be zero anonymity and for review sites to refuse reviews that aren't accompanied by multiple forms of corroborating evidence.
I doubt that. My refusal to respond to circumstances outside my control cannot constitute duress, otherwise patients would just say "I only signed in order to get treatment, I would never have agreed to pay this much otherwise."
What amazes me is that people who choose to retaliate with criminal actions, and those who cheer them on, don't seem to be able to anticipate the results of their behavior. Events like this are why network connectivity becomes regulated.
You're probably right. After the initial attacks, the investigators have been there collecting evidence. The difference between Sony being the victim of a crime and the hackers committing crimes has significant ramifications. I expect that there will be a number of people who spend some time getting sodomized in federal prisons around the world followed up by the inability to ever hold a job in the IT industry, ever get any credit, ever hold a job of any trust, or ever accumulate any money as anything they earn over a certain bare minimum will be taken by the courts to pay their multi-million dollar fines.
Not to mention the possibility of some back alley arrangements leading to some real bodily harm in countries with less robust legal systems.
Don't forget the possibility that you may already have UID's of 1000 on your systems. So simply doing the find commands that several people have recommended is asking for some asshurt.
If they were concerned about the carbon footprint couldn't they have just bought the offsets and stayed home? Actually the whole idea of carbon offsets is just bullshit. I wonder if they worry about a new era Martin Luther who will show what a mockery their Indulgences really are?
Even more to the point, how exactly is their whereabouts being tracked this way any different than their effort of tracking and selling the activities of every single person who ever uses the internet? Seems perfectly fine to me for them to have their travels publicized and mocked as appropriate.
Before you continue slicing your frequencies into narrow and narrow bands, maybe you should look up how much bandwidth 10 KHz will provide for data communications. It'll surprise you.