The same reason conservative members of Congress don't want to close Gitmo and transfer the prisoners to the mainland: 'murica wants to confront, fight, and destroy terrorism...somewhere else but not here.
The iPods are on life-support - they don't make Apple much money anymore but Apple keeps them around because there's still a tiny demand for them.
That's true but the funny thing is that that "tiny demand" was well over a billion $$ in revenue in the past year. Funny how that much money is considered tiny...for Apple, anyway.
Nah. I bought mine when I noticed Apple had discontinued it but before the Media caught on (thus avoiding the high prices). I bought it because I have more than twice this iPod's 160GB of music and wanted the elbow room that my iPhone couldn't give me. I figure my iPod Classic will give up the ghost around the time I get my new 512GB iPhone X.
Your CEO cares enough about the search engine setting in browsers to be pissed off but isn't smart enough to know how to change it? Sounds like a fascinating company...
Recall that the first Republican President waged the country's bloodiest war to prevent the central government's domain from shrinking. The war turned a federation of sovereign states into a compulsory chain of provinces.
Have you always been a southern apologist jerk-off or was it something you picked up in college?
Not force other search engines to license it but allow them to license it, likely for free. By patenting it themselves, Disney can give it away to all search engines and make sure no one search engine has a monopoly on this anti-piracy technology. If you squint really hard, you can see a resemblance to the GPL there...if I'm right.
Is that really the best you have? We shouldn't spend money fighting global warming because then we won't be able to end starvation and stamp out malaria and prevent a big asteroid from slamming into the earth? Really? Only a sociopath.could say that with a straight face.
So you say. Please provide references for your really interesting assertion, otherwise I'll have to believe that you're talking out of your partisan ass.
Slashdot Mirror
Who, exactly, says there has been no warming in the last 20 years and is calling this a "warming hiatus?
You have an interesting hypothesis. I look forward to your evidence supporting it. The other side has already weighed in on it, though.
Nice try. Kennedy took the top tax rate down from 91% to 70%. He also got Congress to pass his economic agenda, which included:
Still think he'd be welcomed by today's Republican Party?
Yeah, and the Democratic president waited until *after* the Democrats lost power in the legislature before proposing it.
So you don't want the President to propose anything because he should have done everything already?
Whoops, you forgot to deny you have an agenda. For your next internet search, look up "straw man".
Funny how your searches of the whole internet only return links to a denier site. With your next search you should look up "confirmation bias".
I take it you were not even alive in the 1960's and 1970's...
I was and you're full of crap. Funny how to you don't link to "plenty of media articles on the subject", eh?
...tree hugging, PETA loving, EPA driving anti-humanitarian ones...
Whoops, your agenda is showing.
Both are clearly claiming there is no global warming since 1997.
I'm sorry but did I miss the part where recorded history started in 1997?
Ah, the Pebble. Relive the graphics of the original Game Boy...on your wrist!
I remember watching an interview of Steve saying how they put everything into the iPhone, almost as a last shot of reviving Apple.
Huh? By the time Apple introduced the iPhone, they had already grown bigger than Dell. What is this "reviving" of which you write?
The same reason conservative members of Congress don't want to close Gitmo and transfer the prisoners to the mainland: 'murica wants to confront, fight, and destroy terrorism...somewhere else but not here.
The iPods are on life-support - they don't make Apple much money anymore but Apple keeps them around because there's still a tiny demand for them.
That's true but the funny thing is that that "tiny demand" was well over a billion $$ in revenue in the past year. Funny how that much money is considered tiny...for Apple, anyway.
Nah. I bought mine when I noticed Apple had discontinued it but before the Media caught on (thus avoiding the high prices). I bought it because I have more than twice this iPod's 160GB of music and wanted the elbow room that my iPhone couldn't give me. I figure my iPod Classic will give up the ghost around the time I get my new 512GB iPhone X.
Hellman's invalided their own complaint, by their prior use of "mayo" for non-egg-producting-containing spreads.
Or: Hellman's validated their own complaint by halting use of the term "mayo" for any of their own products that do not contain any "egg product"?
Your CEO cares enough about the search engine setting in browsers to be pissed off but isn't smart enough to know how to change it? Sounds like a fascinating company...
Recall that the first Republican President waged the country's bloodiest war to prevent the central government's domain from shrinking. The war turned a federation of sovereign states into a compulsory chain of provinces.
Have you always been a southern apologist jerk-off or was it something you picked up in college?
Debating for Wingnuts, Rule #1: Use openly biased, unreliable sources (preferably both).
Did the oil and gas companies need government money to get started?
Yes.
Do you actually expect to be taken seriously when you cite cnsnews.com as a source? Really?
Who gives a shit.
You do since you bothered posting here.
Not force other search engines to license it but allow them to license it, likely for free. By patenting it themselves, Disney can give it away to all search engines and make sure no one search engine has a monopoly on this anti-piracy technology. If you squint really hard, you can see a resemblance to the GPL there...if I'm right.
But it's not so much that I don't want to pay; I've always paid my way. I just don't like the price that you name.
So what is your price?
Is that really the best you have? We shouldn't spend money fighting global warming because then we won't be able to end starvation and stamp out malaria and prevent a big asteroid from slamming into the earth? Really? Only a sociopath.could say that with a straight face.
So you say. Please provide references for your really interesting assertion, otherwise I'll have to believe that you're talking out of your partisan ass.