Slashdot Mirror


User: flacco

flacco's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
1,611
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 1,611

  1. Re:Pink Martini on GNOME 2.0 Desktop Beta 3 Released · · Score: 2
    Donde estas, donde estas, Yolanda?
    Donde estas, donde estas, Yolanda?

    .... etc ....

  2. Re:Heres what we need to do folks on CBDTPA / SSSCA Won't Be Passed This Year, Say Leahy · · Score: 3, Funny
    A 30-second midday ad on a nationwide cable network in about 60 million homes runs only a few thousand dollars. Probably be seen in an average of 4 million homes, roughly.

    Are you kidding me?? Hell, I might pony up a few grand just to tell a bunch of people to kiss my ass on national TV. Well, as many as I could cram into 30 seconds, anyway.

  3. Re:it has the Opera browser? on Retail Sharp Zaurus Released · · Score: 5, Funny
    Tell them why their site sucks.

    http://sharpelectronics.com/global/ContactUsImprov eSite/1,1889,,00.html

    Oh, I already did. They should have an interesting read when they investigate why their http access error log is so large.

    Sharp website designer: "Hmmm, 404's everywhere. I wonder why someone keeps requesting a page named 'http://www.sharpelectronics.com/LEARN-TO-WRITE-CR OSS-BROWSER-SITES-YOU-WORTHLESS-LITTLE-MONKEY'..."

  4. Re:but on OpenOffice 641d Released, Next Stop: 1.0 · · Score: 2
    What he means is breaking up the 'soffice' binary into different binaries for the different applications, much as Word and Powerpoint come and 'winword.exe' and 'powerpoint.exe'. I think.

    Roger Dodger.

    641d startup time is down to about 12 secs on my system (Red Hat on a PIII500 with 256mb). A considerable improvement, but still kind of embarrassing I think. If you could cut that time in half by breaking out the separate apps, it would approach the acceptable range...

  5. Re:but on OpenOffice 641d Released, Next Stop: 1.0 · · Score: 2
    Miguel de Icaza [ximian.com] too has said that time is better spent on improving OpenOffice rather than working on say Gnumeric (which he wrote part of too).

    I could live with that - I use both. But - I apprecitae Gnumeric's lightweight start-up time. OpenOffice is still in the tens of seconds for me, while Gnumeric starts up in a few seconds.

    Maybe if they broke out the separate applications...?

  6. Re:Diehard IE User and I'm not switching on Mozilla Tree Closes for 1.0 · · Score: 2
    Well, since most sites are designed for IE5+ you must have some pretty slim pickins for sites to go see bub!

    "slim pickins"?

    "Bub"?

    OH MY GOD! ANN LANDERS READS SLASHDOT!

  7. Re:Let's buy our own senator on CBDTPA Finds A Champion In the House · · Score: 3, Funny
    I propose that we buy our own senator since Hollings [senate.gov] was bought for as little as $300,000 [opensecrets.org].

    God, you are so paranoid. Everyone knows that money is simply back wages from the entertainment industry to Hollings for doing the voice of Foghorn Leghorn for all those years.

  8. Re:Diehard IE User and I'm not switching on Mozilla Tree Closes for 1.0 · · Score: 2
    You can whine all you want about Webmasters not abiding by WWW standards and using custom extensions, but you know what? At the end of the day you still need to use IE to view their site.

    Well, no, not really. I can just view their competitor's site. Which is what I do.

    So I guess that as long as your business doesn't have any competitors, you don't have to worry about it.

  9. Re:Am I the only one on Sun Works With Apache Software Foundation · · Score: 1
    <crickets>

    </crickets>

    Oh come on now, that should be:

    <crickets/>

  10. Re:Advertising on private land on Gravestones Advertising Video Games? · · Score: 2
    - which is really a pretty good law, I think, since the last thing I want to see while driving down the street to my home is tampon ads in my neighbors' windows.

    If it were my neighbor, it would be douche-bags.

  11. Book was pretty good on Centuries-Old Longitude Clock Runs Again · · Score: 2
    ...but the author kind of flagged near the middle and half-heartedly over-dramatized some sections near the middle, to make it more lay-person-friendly, I think.

    Pretty interesting, nonetheless.

  12. Re:Nomenclature on Red Hat Explains ArsDigita Purchase · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    Congratulations, you've managed to make the exact same obvious joke that has been made every other time ArsDigita has been mentioned on /.

    Of course - and I got a couple points karma out of it. I thought everyone had signed up for that franchise? :-)

  13. Nomenclature on Red Hat Explains ArsDigita Purchase · · Score: 3, Funny

    I've always thought that "ArsDigita" would be a great name for a proctologist's practice.

  14. Re:Well well.. on Rubber Band Machine Gun · · Score: 2
    If you arranged the above in some special way, put a bullet in the nail loop, and some how used the L shaped steel like an arrow and a bow, you would be able to shoot a real amu.

    Also known in 1950's and early 1960's on the streets of the USA as "zip guns". Pretty popular with the gangs back then. Basically a tube that you put a bullet in, then use the rubber band to power a makeshift firing pin.

  15. Re:Well well.. on Rubber Band Machine Gun · · Score: 5, Funny
    No one will EVER blieve me, but I was ROBBED with a rubber band gun.

    I'll bet he said: "Gimme your wallet, and make it snappy."

  16. Re:Just to annoy the RIAA on Server Naming Conventions? · · Score: 1, Troll
    You rated the post yourself by not checking "No Score +1 Bonux"

    You learn something new every day. Just what is the purpose of "No Score +1 Bonus"? I've always ignored it.

  17. Re:Just to annoy the RIAA on Server Naming Conventions? · · Score: 2
    Did you know that the disco music from the Annette Haven movie "Barbara Broadcast" is the music they used later as the "Peoples Court" theme?

    Fascinating... interesting too that the Annette Haven movie has more integrity than People's Court.

  18. Well, what do you know. on Windows XP is Listening · · Score: 4, Funny

    Microsoft IS listening to its customers!

  19. Re:Just to annoy the RIAA on Server Naming Conventions? · · Score: 2, Funny
    To cap it off, play an MP3 rip of some cheesy '70's porn music that you downloaded without paying!

    (That's strange when your first mod is "-1, Overrated". How can it be overrated if it hasn't been rated yet? Maybe it was done by someone who reflexively mods down anything to do with stealing music?)

    Like I said - WITHOUT PAYING! Why pay when you can get music for free off the Internet? There are always new ways of doing it, the record companies and the RIAA can NEVER keep up! Kazaa, AudioGalaxy, Gnutella, IRC - if there are any impressionable youngsters reading this post: MUSIC IS FREE! Why pay when the corporations get all the money anyway? The music-maker hardly gets ANYTHING! Why slave away at Cinna-buns for three hours to pay for a half-ounce piece of plastic when that money is just going to pay for another cigar for the totally rich and greedy music company executives anyway? And so many people are doing it (especially the *cool kids*) that you'll NEVER get arrested! The days of paying fifteen bucks for a CD are as dead as the stove-pipe hat, monocle and vest-pocket watch! Everything is free, Free, FREE! Act now before they encrypt music, then you'll NEVER be able to get free music again! So hurry up and stock up NOW NOW NOW!

  20. Re:Namespaces matter on Server Naming Conventions? · · Score: 2
    With 8 characters, you have over 20 million possibilities.. However, realistically memorable phrases under 8 characters is considerably less. Further, ones that fit a theme even more so..

    That's why I name all of our machines using that pygmy click-language.

  21. Re:DNS? on Server Naming Conventions? · · Score: 2
    You can always just use whatever hostname seems logical, disable all the NetBIOS shit on the windows boxes, and then setup and internal DNS server to resolve the names.

    Not always. If you're part of a global organization, you might have leeway in choosing names for your division but not in altering the network configuration.

  22. Re:Just to annoy the RIAA on Server Naming Conventions? · · Score: 2, Funny
    more fun is when segments crash..."Britney an J-Lo are going down on us again."

    To cap it off, play an MP3 rip of some cheesy '70's porn music that you downloaded without paying!

  23. Re:Element names work well for a small low-order n on Server Naming Conventions? · · Score: 1, Funny
    At my last job, we had ~40 machines in the low order of a class C. We named them after the elements in the periodic table. This gave us an easy naming scheme, and also served as a last-resort DNS system, as the last digit in the machine's IP number was the atomic weight of the element. It was pretty clever.

    Yeah, if you're the admin for the local chemistry geek's club. JAYsus.

  24. Don't get hung up on meaning. on Server Naming Conventions? · · Score: 2
    I'm not sure it's a good idea to use meaningful names. You might want to change (or augment) the function your server provides, then you have to change the name if you want to remain consistent. Or, if your server provides multiple functions, what do you do?

    If you're feeling playful, how about: starsky, hutch, huggybear, kotter, fonzi, richie, potsie, baretta, oscar, felix, etc.

    If not: myco0001, myco0002, etc.

    You can always assign aliases for functional purposes: mail, news, www, ftp, etc.

  25. Re:is software akin to solid state machinery? on Washington State Debates Taxing Software Creation · · Score: 2
    Or, why not try this...

    How about this: Massive inheritance taxes.

    We often hear that the US is (in theory) a meritocracy: be smart, work hard, and you too can be wealthy. In practice the US is essentially a dynastic plutocracy.

    Massive inheritance taxes would not only fund the treasury in a way consistent with our ideology of "merit", it would reduce the gap between rich and poor, and reduce resentment between classes. It's hard to fault a rich guy who has worked honestly to create his wealth; it's easy to dislike a guy who inherited his wealth.