Slashdot Mirror


Red Hat Explains ArsDigita Purchase

hezron writes "Red Hat VP, Howard Jacobson, sent a mass email explaining their acquisition of ArsDigita's assets. Here is the press release concerning the acquisition." The press release is actually a quick FAQ about the purchase - Howard does a good job of explaining the purchase and the reasons for it. Howard's a smart guy, and I hope that the purchase of AD will mean a longer life then how AD's past management was handling it.

136 comments

  1. Step one: by Matey-O · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Now if they'd just get Phil back.

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    1. Re:Step one: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      " Now if they'd just get Phil back."

      Riiiight.

      Just what they need...someone to take his golden $6M parachute.

      I feel bad for the poor guy.

  2. Oh geeze... by meckardt · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Now Red Hat is spamming us.

  3. "Quick FAQ" is right! by sharp-bang · · Score: 5, Funny

    The is the first press release I've ever seen from a publicly traded comapny that consisted entirely of bullet points...

    --
    #!
    1. Re:"Quick FAQ" is right! by baptiste · · Score: 4, Funny
      The is the first press release I've ever seen from a publicly traded comapny that consisted entirely of bullet points...

      Which is nice, but I think they got a BIT repetitive. If I read "Red Hat will" or "Open Source (roots|software)" one more time. All I kept thinking was 'Bob Dole thinks he...' He always spoke in the 3rd person :)

      Should be interesting to see where ACSJ goes from here!

  4. this is good for arsDigita by ChenLing · · Score: 4, Interesting

    arsDigita has great engineers, and pretty good technology (a few bugs, but mostly worked out now). The really bad part (and what drove aD into the ground) was bad management. As the only (AFAIK) profitable open source based company, Redhat should know a thing or two about running a business well. Hopefully they'll be able to restructure the aD assets and personnel, and really add to the community.

    --
    "You have the option of insanity. I do not. And that makes me crazy!" - Brian to Angela, My So-Called Life
    1. Re:this is good for arsDigita by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Arsdigita had great engineers. Not to belittle those who are left, several of whom I have great respect for, but the majority of the developers were laid off in the acquisition.

    2. Re:this is good for arsDigita by vlad_petric · · Score: 2
      As the only (AFAIK) profitable open source based company ...

      When did they ever make a profit ? I think you are confusing Red Hat with SuSe ...

      The Raven.

      --

      The Raven

    3. Re:this is good for arsDigita by Ewan · · Score: 2

      Im not sure about redhat, but cygnus (which redhat now owns) was definitely profitable.

  5. Article expanded my vocabulary! by acordes · · Score: 5, Funny

    I believe that's the first time I've ever seen the word "fetishistically" used. I will definitely have to work that into my everyday speech.

    1. Re:Article expanded my vocabulary! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First usage: He fetishistically worked the usage of the word-kinda-thingy into his everyday conversation.

    2. Re:Article expanded my vocabulary! by higgins · · Score: 1

      Though I don't have the text in front of me, I believe that describing computers as being good at "fetishistically counting things" was used by Neal Stephenson in Snow Crash to describe the operation of the Metaverse. In particular, he describes the fetishistic attachment we all have for 2 and powers of 2.

      Mike

    3. Re:Article expanded my vocabulary! by YoPt · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      For the unedu-ma-cated:

      Defeintion by www.Dictionary.com (Source: The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition)

      1 entry found for fetishistically.
      fetishism also fetichism Pronunciation Key (ft-shzm, ft-)
      n.
      Worship of or belief in magical fetishes.
      Excessive attachment or regard.
      The displacement of sexual arousal or gratification to a fetish. fetishist n.
      fetishistic adj.
      fetishistically adv.

      Source: The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition
      Copyright © 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
      Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.

    4. Re:Article expanded my vocabulary! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that was in the Cory Doctorow piece.
      Although that wouldn't be out of place in Neal Stephenson's piece either.

    5. Re:Article expanded my vocabulary! by dhamsaic · · Score: 5, Funny

      Every once in a while I like to masturbate a new word into my vocabulary, even if I don't know what it means.

      --
      Every once in a while I like to masturbate a new word into my vocabulary, even if I don't know what it means.
  6. 1 thing... by sootman · · Score: 1

    as long as they don't ever take down http://www.arsdigita.com/books/ I'll be happy.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:1 thing... by Max+Webster · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but http://www.oradoc.com/ which was owned by aD has been kaput for a while now. :-(

  7. From the FAQ by lw54 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    How does the Red Hat/ArsDigita deal complement Red Hat's business?
    • ArsDigita software enables content creation through collaboration
    • ArsDigita software and consulting expand Red Hat's ability to deliver the benefits of collaboration to the enterprise
    Okay, I can understand those reasons, but these?
    • Red Hat has been a strong contributor to creation and enhancement of Open Source software
    • Collaborative process is at the heart of Open Source software development
    • The collaborative Open Source process allows widely distributed contributors to participate
    • ArsDigita has strong Open Source roots

    1. Re:From the FAQ by reaper20 · · Score: 3, Informative

      * Red Hat has been a strong contributor to creation and enhancement of Open Source software.

      Ummm, let's see, Alan Cox on the kernel, Chris Blizzard on Mozilla, Havoc on Gnome, bero does KDE packages

      Those are the ones on the top of my head. I probably forgot a few, but GNOME, gcc, and certainly Mozilla on Linux wouldn't be as far as they are today without the Red Hat guys.

    2. Re:From the FAQ by crsm · · Score: 1
      Okay, I can understand those reasons, but these?
      • Red Hat has been a strong contributor to creation and enhancement of Open Source software

        cd /usr/src/linux
        grep -ih redhat MAINTAINERS CREDITS \
        | perl -pe 's/^.:\s*//' | sort -u


      • Collaborative process is at the heart of Open Source software development

        True. If you look around you will occasionally find a single-person project, but you would for sure also find pledges for help on the projects home-page :-)

      • The collaborative Open Source process allows widely distributed contributors to participate

        cd /usr/src/linux-2.4
        grep -ih '@' MAINTAINERS CREDITS \
        | perl -p -e 's/^.*\.//; s/\W.*/\n/' | sort -u


      • ArsDigita has strong Open Source roots

        True. The original pre-java version of ACS was fully open sourced. Their new java version is not, though.
    3. Re:From the FAQ by lurking · · Score: 1

      Dammit I wish I had mod right now! You are spot on the money!

    4. Re:From the FAQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who gives a damn about Open Source, what people care about is how much profit they can create.
      Quality of RH OS is going down because they have less and less people working on OS. Just look at RH 7.2 and compare it with SuSE or Mandrake or Turbolinux. One has to wonder how they managed to sign it off after QA (or, whether QA exists).

      For comparison, SourceForge - how much is it priced? A team of 20 people can program a decent collaboration application (something like SourceForge) in two months - Apache, CVS, OpenLDAP, etc., it's just a package integration work and some scripting.

      That's not a product or service that they'll be able to resell or rent.

  8. O great... Acronyms... by einhverfr · · Score: 2

    Just think... Redhat could rename ACS to RCS (RedHat Community System) and then Revision Control System would be out of business...

    Of course, this is probabyl why they are not planning to rename ACS :)b

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  9. Will this press release bore the hell out of all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    * RedHat recognizes that press releases are boring.
    * RedHat has long been a proponent of boring press releases.
    * In light of this historic relationship, this press release will bore the hell out of everyone who reads it.

  10. Re:Gas Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It's not just a great idea. It's the law.

    Gas is the verb (imperative), and Bill the object (noun). Get the joke? (...and as far as I know, there is unfortunately no death penalty yet for abusing monopoly power...)

  11. I like RedHat but... by FurryFeet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    is this really the right time to buy a new, troubled company? I applaud the effort to save Ars Digita, but there is a reason it had gone under...
    Somehow, I think a company should refrain from acquisitions until it is comfortably in the black itself. I'd hate for RedHat to burn through its reserves faster than necesary.

    1. Re:I like RedHat but... by StudMuffin · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The reason is simple...

      Greylock was the VC firm behind both RedHat and Ars Digita. RedHat's 'purchase' of Ars Digita allows Greylock to bury the aD losses in the RH books, as well as give a glimmer of hope to the ACS product making the light of day again.

      About the Ars Digita staff going to RedHat - the total number appears to be about 10 to 15 people, so it's hardly the flood of engineers. RedHat got ACS for a song. And to think that two years ago when aD approached RedHat about putting ACS into the standard distro, they laughed in our faces.

      (Yes, I was an aD wonk)

      --
      Weaseling out of things is important to learn. It's what separates us from the animals... except the weasel. -
    2. Re:I like RedHat but... by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Red Hat seems to be doing this a lot, they were very smart, they sold the secondary offering of stock when their stock was way overvalued, pocketed several hundred million dollars, and now they are buying up the assets and employees of a lot of bankrupt open source companies for pennies on the dollar.

      Makes me glad to own Red Hat stock, even though I did lose a lot riding it from $30 to $9, I made it back riding it from $4 to $7, and still holding those shares right now. It would take a major turn of events to make me sell their stock now.

      Red Hat is THE American Linux company, now that LNUX is misnamed. I always knew they would come through in the end.

      --This post powered by Red Hat (tm) Linux. :)

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    3. Re:I like RedHat but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also the muffin and coffee line at Carberry's has far fewer people with those little rectangular cool-person glasses, and we neighbours are grateful.

  12. But... by TaleSpinner · · Score: 1

    ...I thought they hated Tcl! God knows
    they've fired or alienated into quitting
    enough of their Tcl people.

    1. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Who are you talking about?

      BTW, the ArsDigita stuff is not TCL any more. They're using Java or something (last I heard).

      Personally I think both TCL and Java suck... If the functional language people would get off their collective butts and write a real compiler, those would be the languages of choice. By real compiler I mean something that compiles directly from source to assembly language without using a middle layer of C. This would allow compiled functional programs to run at what we consider normal speed ("normal" being C).

    2. Re:But... by __past__ · · Score: 2
      If the functional language people would get off their collective butts and write a real compiler, those would be the languages of choice. By real compiler I mean something that compiles directly from source to assembly language without using a middle layer of C.

      You mean like you can do it with Objective Caml, Standard ML, Haskell, Common Lisp, Scheme, and probably a lot of other functional languages?

      Seems you need a better excuse to keep using ugly languages...

    3. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of those are much slower than the equivalent C code.

      They all use byte-code or generate C code, then compile the C code.

      None that I know of generate assembly language directly.

      They could all be much, much faster if compiled directly rather than using C.

    4. Re:But... by __past__ · · Score: 4, Interesting
      All of those are much slower than the equivalent C code.

      Proof? Of course, there cannot be one, but if you like benchmarks, compare the Great Computer Language Shootout. Though C "wins", I wouldn't exactly call it "much slower".

      They all use byte-code or generate C code, then compile the C code.

      Wrong. For all languages I mentioned there are native compilers available. For all (AFAIK, not sure about Standard ML), there are also bytecode compilers available, for some also compilers to C.

      BTW, nobody would ever be so stupid to first generate bytecode, then C out of this (At least I hope so). Oh, and assembly isn't what you compile to in the end, thats why there are assemblers.

      None that I know of generate assembly language directly.

      If you talk of generating native binaries directly, you surely should try to get to know more. Here are a few:

      I'm sure you'll find more.
    5. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Proof? Of course, there cannot be one, but if you like benchmarks, compare the Great Computer Language Shootout [bagley.org]. Though C "wins", I wouldn't exactly call it "much slower".

      I have done my own benchmarks. Also, if you look at the shootout benchmarks there are only a couple tests where O'Caml or Mlton come out on top. And C would beat all of them with just a couple changes. True that for the most part O'Caml is not many times slower, but in the applications I like to develop even a 50% slow down in a critical area (array access) can have major effects on performance. These are applications that have high user interactivity (games, graphics/CAD, etc.). I really believe funtional languages can be as fast as C (assuming same functionality).

      Wrong. For all languages I mentioned there are native compilers available.

      A native compiler is not the same as creating assembly code directly. I have looked at all the native compilers you are talking about. They all generate C code then compile the C to native. That is an extra layer that is not necessary. That's what I've been saying all along.

      I'm not sure you understand what I am talking about. I have been programming in functional languages for a long time now. I have used every language you listed. I like functional languages, I just feel they could be faster.

      The compiler writers took shortcuts by using a C intermiate layer before compiling to binary. This is understandable so that the compiler writer doesn't have to think about too much, but it has a cost of runtime speed and it doesn't have to be that way.

      The compiler writers need to pretend like they are writing the fist C compiler: There is no other intermediate language that will give you the speed you need, you must generate the assembly code directly.

      BTW, I'm associating "assembly = binary". I know assembly needs to be compiled, but it as close to machine code as you can get.

    6. Re:But... by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2
      Proof? Of course, there cannot be one, but if you like benchmarks, compare the Great Computer Language Shootout [bagley.org]. Though C "wins", I wouldn't exactly call it "much slower".

      One of the fun things .NET does is to finaly make a fair comparison of programming languages possible. In the past the problem has been that most competitions of that type tended to be won by FORTRAN, not because the language was any good or fast but just because of the humongous amount of work that has gone into optimizing FORTRAN compilers.

      C compilers have recently overtaken FORTRAN for the same reason, the effort put into optimization, plus C is quite a bit friendlier to the optimiser than FORTRAN.

      With .NET you can use the same back end to produce code for practicaly any mainstream language and plenty of far from mainstream ones. It is very unlikely that there will be major performance differences between Basic, C#, and J#.It will be interesting to see how much the gap between C and Perl is narrowed.

      Some of the traditional gap between the C languages and functional languages will be narrowed because CLI is a managed code environment. I suspect there is still some performance penalty to using functional languages in a functional maner but it will probably be irrelevant since you only need to use thefunctional code for the parts where functional languages help.

      Case in point here is I remember once writing a prolog program to do soe stuff. Prolog was great for the real problem but when it came to all the support code to do the UI and I/O it really started to creak. Not only was the code slow, it was also really hard to write and was full of kludges (anyone remember the cut?).

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    7. Re:But... by dhogaza · · Score: 2

      This is bullshit, as the C# bytecode virtual machine is not by any stretch of the imagination language agnostic.

      Any measurement of performance will need to analyze the performance of the compiler and the "fit" with the C# VM if anything meaningful is to emerge.

      I hate it when non-compiler writers pontificate on slashdot about compiler technology.

      Not that it's different than with any other topic, it just happens that I'm a Compiler Expert (TM).

    8. Re:But... by Patrik+Nordebo · · Score: 2

      CMU CL does not, at any stage in the compilation process, generate intermediary C code. At least not that I've been able to see, and given that I've looked at the code generation, I'd be very surprised if it did.
      Nor do SBCL, ACL, MCL, or LispWorks. There are a number of CL compilers that compile via C, such as GCL and ECLS, but you don't have to use those, there are lots of other choices.
      As for the other languages, I am not sufficiently familiar with the compilers to say whether they use an intermediate C stage or not.

    9. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I have recently learned, O'Caml does not produce intermediate C code either.

      Wow, blew my mind. My guess is that the resulting assembly is not optimized as well as a C compiler and that is why there is a lack of performance.

    10. Re:But... by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2
      This is bullshit, as the C# bytecode virtual machine is not by any stretch of the imagination language agnostic

      As I stated in the post the difference between the C familly languages is likely to be least. In particular I don't expect there to be a speed penalty for J#.

      I also stated that functional languages are likely to be somewhat disadvantaged. I suspect that overall however the differences between languages will be somewhat reduced compared to traditional contests where the quality of implementation is the dominant variable being measured.

      Not that it's different than with any other topic, it just happens that I'm a Compiler Expert (TM).

      Pity you don't appear to be an English comprehension expert.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
  13. I hope they buy Sourceforge as well by Gnulix · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't that be nice? Then we wouldn't have to worry about SF doing a /. and begin some weird subscription scheme. And the service would remain Free. Gnulix - not only a short bread

  14. Re:O great... Acronyms... by MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM · · Score: 0, Funny

    "Pirating software is like stealing crack from a drug dealer and pretending that it makes you free from addiction."

    Pirates are known to rob your boat or possibly rape you. But stealing software? That seem a little far fetched. Who told you that?

  15. Red Hat to mismanage another company? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is Red Hat purchasing more companies when they can't even manage the companies they already have? Red Hat bought successful companies like Cygnus, HKS, AV, and C2Net and ran them into the ground. Every quarter more and more Red Hat employees are laid off or told to not work for weeks to make the stock numbers look good. Even the Red Hat careers page is mostly internships. It just does not make sense. I feel sorry for those ArsDigita folks.

  16. Risky by Cossie · · Score: 1

    It's always nice to see that open source companies are devoted enough to the movement to try to keep (what they see as) valuable parts of it from failing. Still, I hope we don't end up seeing them be so supportive that they drive themselves into the ground in the process...

  17. Top Embarrassing Lines Of Windows Source Code by cpeterso · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    That list forget to include the following line of code:

    #define BACKDOOR_PASSWORD "!seineew era sreenigne epacsteN"

    1. Re:Top Embarrassing Lines Of Windows Source Code by baptiste · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      LOL - I forgot about that one and have added it - of course you can add items too - anyone can (all the items in that list and all the others came from site users)

  18. Looks to me... by banky · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It looks ot me like Red Hat wanted some Java programmers in its payroll. Since Sun is now starting to talk Linux more, and a lot of people think that there is a 'showdown' brewing between Java/J2EE and .NET, Red Hat is afraid of being marginalized between the two. Now they have a Java toolkit and the programmers to use it.

    --
    ZOMG I WOULD LOVE TO KNOW ABOUT YOUR FEELINGS ON MACINTOSH VERSUS WINDOWS, VI VERSUS EMACS, AND HOW YOU'RE NOT A DORK
    1. Re:Looks to me... by FreshFunk510 · · Score: 1, Troll
      As an ex-ad it's more like this:
      • Greylock owns Red Hat
      • Greylock owns Arsdigita
      • Arsdigta is a failure
      • Use Red Hat money to "buy" Arsdigita
      • Write off Arsdigita as a loss ($$$) (because that's basically what it is)
      If Red Hat hat really wanted some java programmer they would've gone out there and hired some (theyre' a dime a dozen in case you haven't looked at the current economy). And it doesn't really make sense that they basically just fired everyone in aD except those who are needed to clean the rest of the $hit up.
      --


      "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
    2. Re:Looks to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Recently, Red Hat completed the purchase of key assets, technologies, and personnel from ArsDigita Corporation...

      I've seen a lot of mergers and aqusitions but never where the employees were 'purchased'... were they slaves?

    3. Re:Looks to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I've seen a lot of mergers and aqusitions but never where the employees were 'purchased'... were they slaves?

      In these kinds of deals (speaking as having been through a couple), part of the deal is the parent company gets guarantees (done via nice incentives like bonuses, raises, etc) that key players will come across to the new company. Without such people, a great part of the value goes away.

      Hardly slaves :-).

    4. Re:Looks to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This seems an interesting position to me. My company and arsDigita both had Peter Bloom from General Atlantic Partners on the board, and GAP sold like 6 companies to RedHat for pennies on the dollar in the last 6 months. I know how low the dollar amount was that RedHat offered to buy us for after they waited until we were out of money to finish the paperwork, and I can't help but wonder if something shady happened... I mean, the equipment that we had was worth more. I doubt that RedHat wanted some Java programmers. They probably just wanted some propritary technology on the cheap, since their own programmers mostly refuse to write non GPL software and RedHat is realizing that they need to make some money soon. Now, since GAP liquidated all of these companies, and lost lots of their investment dollars, what did GAP or Mr. Bloom get to sell out? Why aren't GAP's backers pissed off?

    5. Re:Looks to me... by bonius_rex · · Score: 3, Interesting
      This "showdown" is a Big_Fucking_Deal(TM).

      Sun's refusal to open Java to a standards body is making it really hard for me (a card-carrying Open-Source-Looney) to figure out what is better long term. I'm all for open standards, and (on the surface, at least) it looks like .NET is more open than J2EE. (Microsoft, has at least submitted some of .NET to ECMA)

      Is this a correct analysis? Something the back of my mind tells me I've just been tricked...

      I have always been of the mind that the trio of Sun/Netscape/Oracle was the One_True_Religion, but now I'm not so sure.

    6. Re:Looks to me... by t · · Score: 1
      That is probably a correct analysis. That is/was/will be the MS battle plan, Be open, give stuff away, etc... However, I pity you when version 4 comes out which, in order for MS to innovate had to make certain "changes" that "unfortunately" will cause some compatibility problems with competitors products not integrated into Windows.

      t.

    7. Re:Looks to me... by banky · · Score: 2

      The problem with "Wanted: Java Programmers" is that you have to have a product and a vision. By buying up AD, they already HAVE a product and vision, and can strike out from there (or cancel it if they don't like it). They have a client list, a product, people with knowledge of the product, everything. That puts them in a much better state than an ad in the local paper.

      --
      ZOMG I WOULD LOVE TO KNOW ABOUT YOUR FEELINGS ON MACINTOSH VERSUS WINDOWS, VI VERSUS EMACS, AND HOW YOU'RE NOT A DORK
    8. Re:Looks to me... by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2

      The press release is just corporate bullshit.

      'ACSJ provides enterprise customers with a scalable, reliable platform for ACS deployments' - LOL.

      To my knowledge there has never been any site succesfully built using ACS Java - sorry, ACSJ - and I doubt there ever will be. I don't know why RedHat bought the company - what were they thinking of? Did Greylock tell them to?

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    9. Re:Looks to me... by greenrd · · Score: 1
      Yeah, and if the words "client list" don't immediately jump out at you, you don't know much about business.

  19. Background by Futurepower(tm) · · Score: 3, Informative


    See this for background about ArsDigita:

    ArsDigita: From Start-Up to Bust-Up by Philip Greenspun

    --
    Bush's education improvements were
  20. Re:Then/Than, among other things by Poodleboy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Maybe you shouldn't bother, smarty pants--"impart" is a transitive verb and you seem to have forgotten the direct object. ;)

  21. Let's define what a CMS is... by Dalroth · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've heard a lot about CMSs and ArsDigita in particular, but I'm not entirely up on my CMS terminology.

    I poked around on the ArsDigita pages, but what I found was a lot of marketing and buzzword crap, and no really good to the point explanation on what it is. I don't have the time to read all the marketing B.S., so I'm hoping somebody here can get straight to the point and tell me what this is all about.

    If I were to download and install the ArsDigita CMS, what exactly would that buy me?

    Is it a collection of APIs for developing web pages?
    Is it a templating engine for generating markup?
    Is it a kind of uber-Wiki?
    Is it a message board system?
    Is it some online collaborative environmnet like Source Forge?
    It it an online publishing system like Slash or PostNuke?

    Help me get to the point!

    Bryan

    1. Re:Let's define what a CMS is... by GigsVT · · Score: 3, Funny

      CMS is a proactive collaboration toolkit based on fundamental shifts in paradigm in the sector of flattening orginizations. This will allow for B2B and B2C relationships in cyberspace, thus increasing flow of information and ideas, in an interactive way.

      BINGO!

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:Let's define what a CMS is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CMS Defined: (Usage specific to commercial or open source product with business built around selling expensive service and consulting. For usage more generally applied to "cool code I made to make my life easier" see "slashcode.com"):

      1) The product of really smart people who chose to build a system so they could efficiently publish web pages based on their idea of content and user experience turned into a "thing" to be sold to other people unable to hire people smart enough to build their own systems for their own needs.

      2) What doomed companies with a little too much V.C. cash to burn buy before really thinking through their problems that, in turn, makes them buy a lot of other over-expensive hardware , software and service contracts.

      3) The class of technology behind all of the great Internet success stories like... Excite and Planet Direct.

    3. Re:Let's define what a CMS is... by denshi · · Score: 5, Informative
      The other poster's cynical point are correct, but not technically useful. I'll handle that.

      CMS is software to define rules to manage content production and publication. So if you were to download and install the aD CMS, you would get all of the above, except integrated. So you post content as with the publishing system like Slash, but you can collaboratively author and manage said content a la SourceForge. The previous four are part of the basic ACS system; they are necessary but not sufficient to describe CMS. Additionally, the focus of CMS is to manage content -- so the CMS software also allows you to write the control flow of content and integrate it with all the above. So rather than being limited to the rules for posting on /. or Scoop, you can define the rules for "such and such must review, approve here, loop and edit, comment, publish, email, repeat" or whatever you come up with on-site.

      Of course, unless you have a penchant for Java-flavoured pain, it might be easier to use the CMS with OpenACS 4.5beta1 than the packages from a defunct company that fired most of their programmers. Still, it's nicer than what Vignette will charge you 6 figures for.

    4. Re:Let's define what a CMS is... by dhogaza · · Score: 2

      Eek! I just built that OpenACS 4.5 beta1 tarball and it has a stupid error in it, and it's already mentioned on slashdot???. Oh no ... it's bad enough having the flu without having one of the symptoms (temporary incompetence) exposed to the world!

    5. Re:Let's define what a CMS is... by styrotech · · Score: 1

      Thanks, that really cleared it up.

    6. Re:Let's define what a CMS is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a former aD CMS developer, I can testify that if you download CMS, you will get a bunch of non-working API and a useless data model. CMS is a neat idea that was horribly architected, and badly implemented. It is of benefit to no one.

  22. More background by Futurepower(tm) · · Score: 2


    Here is more background information about ArsDigita:

    ArsDigita VCs v. Co-founders: The battle for control of ArsDigita Corporation

    To me, the entire dispute was very interesting.

    --
    Bush's education improvements were
  23. Re:But... OCAML! by PylonHead · · Score: 1

    Have you worked with ocaml?

    www.ocaml.org.

    It's a great language, and transparently compiles to assembly on both windows and linux. Fast, modular, with all the functional fun that the kids want these days.

    --
    # (/.);;
    - : float -> float -> float =
  24. No subscription for me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    "I hope that the purchase of AD will mean a longer life then how AD's past management was handling it."
    Ouch, so close! Only a few more hours and Slashdot would have had my $120! I guess you just can't lose a bet against Slashdot grammar. This time it was Hemos, not Taco. The illiteracy twins are at work again.

  25. Well, this ought to please cheapbytes! by abe+ferlman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Compare this short notice:

    Note: Sun's trademark prevents us from calling the software "ACS Java", though "ACS for the Java Platform" is OK. Hence the abbreviation "ACSJ".

    To this unfortunate obfuscation at cheapbytes.com:

    Looking for CDs containing the downloadable
    version of the XXX XXX Linux distribution?

    Hint: The name has to do with an article of clothing
    to keep your head warm.

    We can't call it by it's real name due to trademark law.
    Our president will be providing a statement and information at
    a later time regarding this subject. Please be informed about
    this matter prior to jumping to any erroneous conclusions.


    Cheapbytes, IANAL and this is not legal advice, but if the statement above is good enough for redhat, I wonder what could prevent you from saying something like

    Note: Red Hat's trademark prevents us from calling the software "Red Hat", though "XXX XXX" is OK. Hence the abbreviation "XXX XXX".

    --
    microsoftword.mp3 - it doesn't care that they're not words...
    1. Re:Well, this ought to please cheapbytes! by Lac · · Score: 2

      You despair about Cheapbytes' notice stating that they have to call Red Hat Linux "XXX XXX Linux" because of the trademark. Don't despair, they could be even more serious about trademark law. I personnally think they should call it "XXX XXX XXXXX". Maybe it's just me, but a "XXXXX distribution" sounds a lot more interesting than yet another Linux distro. The GUI on that has to be nice.

  26. Then/than? *argh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "a longer life THAN..." not "a longer life THEN..."

    Is it TOO much to ask supposed "editors" to actually make sure that what they write (and expect us to PAY for) is at least vaguely grammatically correct?

    *sheesh*

  27. Deep background by Futurepower(tm) · · Score: 2


    People with no technical education often think they can participate sensibly in a technical enterprise. They often use an immense amount of energy hiding the fact that they cannot.

    The acting performances by Academy Award winners are, literally, bland and unconvincing compared to the acting performances of managers trying to pretend that they can manage a business they don't understand.

    Here is an article about that subject: An Engineer's View of Venture Capitalists

    --
    Bush's education improvements were
  28. Re: I have, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have mostly used Erlang and am just now getting into O'Caml. The whole point being to try to get more speed.

    O'Caml is fairly fast but still uses a middle layer of C code and therefore is slower than it should be. Array access, even when compiled with "-unsafe" is slower than the equivalent C code. Unsafe mode should be the same speed as the C version. My guess to the reason it's not is due to that middle layer of C code I keep talking about. That's not the only area O'Caml suffers either, in fact, from what I can tell, array access is the fastest of anything in O'Caml.

    Another problem is when you start using external API's that have a C interface (OpenGL for example). It gets really slow (2-3 times or more slower) when you start accessing those.

    If the O'Caml compiler generated the ASM code directly it could make serious optimizations and not have to deal with the cruft the C compiler adds. I'm surprised that no one has done it before. Funational languages would be really fast if compiled directly. They just don't do it though, they seem to always generate C code before compiling or use byte-code which is really slow compared to native code.

    It's not that O'Caml is that bad, it's not. It's very fast, but it could be the same speed or faster than C (at least with bounds checking and such turned off).

  29. MODERATORS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Overrated? This is damn funny! Mod the poor bastard up.

  30. Moving to compete with VA? by nzkoz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Looking at the press release, I noticed the following bullets:

    • Red Hat has been a strong contributor to creation and enhancement of Open Source software
    • Collaborative process is at the heart of Open Source software development
    • The collaborative Open Source process allows widely distributed contributors to participate

    Perhaps RedHat is moving to provide a collaborative development platform ..... ala SourceForge Enterprise edition. Could VA's SourceForge business be about to get another competitor. Of course, if you believe what their CEO had to say on their last conference call, they don't have competitors.

    --
    Cheers Koz
  31. Re:this is good for arsDigita? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That doesn't sound like good management to me. Sounds more like an AOL acquisition.

  32. you know what could be funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... red hat buying mandrake.

  33. Important: Eve Andersson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eve had some nude pictures up before we mocked her on /. about a month ago, now they're gone.

    Does anyone have them saved or cached?

  34. Who's gonna manage it? by BrentN · · Score: 1

    What I want to know is whether they're gonna make an effort to get some of the original team on board, Greenspun, Eve Andersson, etc. Assuming, of course, that they'd want to come back. But RedHat's got to have someone clueful to manage the ACS project if they ever want anything out of it besides a tax writeoff.

    1. Re:Who's gonna manage it? by f0rthguy · · Score: 1

      Why would they want to? They were equally as bad as the most recent management. If not for the misguided cults who worship them, folks might actually take note of the truth, which is that it is this group of folks who started ArsDigita down the path of destruction.

  35. Re: I have, but... by t · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Ok, I will tell you why functional languages do not compile directly to assembly but first I need to translate what you implied:

    If the O'Caml compiler generated the ASM code directly it could make serious optimizations and not have to deal with the cruft the C compiler adds.

    It seems to me that you, like many linux users, are really saying "why don't they compile directly to x86!" The world is bigger than x86. Most scripting languages want to be cross-platform. And no that does not mean run on windows and linux-x86.

    If you took a second to look at how much code gcc is then you would realize how fscking big a task that is.

    t.

  36. Re: I have, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, as I'm typing this on my Sun Blade (which is next to my Mac, which is next to my PC) I wouldn't say I'm forgetting about other platforms.

    But yes, you would have to target specific architectures... pretty much just like the C compilers.

    BTW, I don't want a scripting functional language. There's no reason (other than speed) that I can't use a functional language to replace C in almost everything.

    It is a big task, yes... but that's the only way to be as fast as C.

  37. Excellent article! by GCP · · Score: 2

    Virtual mod point to you ;-)

    --
    "Those who have never entered upon scientific pursuits know not a tithe of the poetry by which they are surrounded."
  38. But will ACS/Java be truly open? by aquarian · · Score: 2

    From what I understand, all the ACS/Tcl software is open source and really well documented, but the Java stuff is either not completely open, or too murky to figure out easily. Supposedly, in a last ditch effort, AD management was heading in a closed-source, packaged-solutions direction.

    So, does this mean we'll get a usable ACS/Java with every Redhat boxed set? That would be cool...

    In the meantime, I'm learning Tcl!

    1. Re:But will ACS/Java be truly open? by dhogaza · · Score: 5, Informative
      Learn Tcl and join the OpenACS effort.

      We've got one thing aD never had - a truly community-based and community-supported development effort.

      aD shut their "luser" community out (pronounce it out loud and you'll understand their attitude, starting with Philip Greenspun and never modified thereafter, no matter what disputes he and the VCs might've had), refusing bug fix patches, design input, etc from the large set of folks interested in the fruit's of Philip's efforts to start a company devoted to providing an open source toolkit for web development (but based on Oracle because that's how you Get Rich Quick!)

      Well ... the OpenACS community is certainly weaker in numbers and in hours (we all work for a living doing something else, typically custom client development).

      But ... we stumble along and have a few coups of our own, such as an OpenACS application winning a prestigous mobile computing award in the UK recently.

      I think it is great that RedHat intends to continue forth with ACSJ, if true.

      But ... our little project won't care. We have a half-dozen or so companies making a living off our cooperative efforts (a socialist-capitalist mind-meld, if you will, as we have our separate businesses, compete, yet cooperate on the shared toolkit). So we're motivated to suceed.

  39. Hah! A face saving move... by aquarian · · Score: 3, Insightful
    RedHat's 'purchase' of Ars Digita allows Greylock to bury the aD losses in the RH books

    You're being way too polite... this was nothing but a face-saving move by the vulture capitalists... better than just saying the company tanked and shut its doors (which is the real truth).

  40. Greylock bailout is correct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I should know, I work there. Thanks RH!! Now we'll be able to soak more cash from the fat cats.

  41. Nomenclature by flacco · · Score: 3, Funny

    I've always thought that "ArsDigita" would be a great name for a proctologist's practice.

    --
    pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    1. Re:Nomenclature by flacco · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      Congratulations, you've managed to make the exact same obvious joke that has been made every other time ArsDigita has been mentioned on /.

      Of course - and I got a couple points karma out of it. I thought everyone had signed up for that franchise? :-)

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
  42. Re:Gas Bill by BankofAmerica_ATM · · Score: 0

    the Man in the Red Hat?

  43. As A RedHat Shareholder by joel_archer · · Score: 1

    I bought 100 shares of RHAT at $5/share (couple of months ago), basically to put my money where my mouth was. It was a token of my support and I could not care less whether I lose it all or make a million (although I DO have a preference).

    I expected/hoped that RedHat would make decisions that struck a balance between open source and capitalistic risk taking. I think I'll pick up another 100 shares. Nice job.

  44. hahahah by Cinematique · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Ars got 0wn3d.

    :)

  45. Re:I like RedHat but... Tiemann also provides fina by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Tiemann also provides financial support to organizations that further the goals of software freedom, including the Free Software Foundation, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and the ArsDigita Foundation."

    http://www.redhat.com/about/corporate/team/tiema nn .html

  46. Re:Then/than? *argh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On the subscription services you get an extra tick box to disable the spelling and grammar errors in the articles. You can't disable just one or the other though.

  47. Eve's past life by nucal · · Score: 1
    Remember the "good old days"??

    http://www.ugcs.caltech.edu/~eveander/

  48. Repost:Eve's past life by nucal · · Score: 1

    Sorry ... this might be a little more convenient: For the love of PI.

  49. Translation by The+Smith · · Score: 1
    What is the nature of the deal between Red Hat and ArsDigita?
    We bought them.

    How does the Red Hat/ArsDigita deal complement Red Hat's business?
    They make us bigger.

    How will Red Hat change the ArsDigita business?
    We'll swallow them.

    Will Red Hat continue to develop ACS for the Java Platform (ACSJ)?
    Yes.

    When will the 5.0 version of ACSJ be released?
    Whenever we damn well feel like it.

    Will ACSJ remain Open Source?
    Yes.

    Will Red Hat change the license for ACSJ from ADPL to GPL?
    Yes. Well, probably.

    Will ACS continue to be called "ACS"?
    Yes. Well, maybe.

    What will happen to www.arsdigita.com?
    We'll swallow it.

    Will Red Hat continue to operate ArsDigita's public discussion forums (web/db, "ACS Core & CMS", etc.)?
    Yes.

  50. Power Point... by dgulbran · · Score: 1

    Wow... this press release reads like an executive Power Point presentation. Ten to one it was. :)

    --
    The world won't end in darkness, it'll end in family fun, with Coca-cola clouds behind a Big Mac sun.
  51. openacs and java by brlewis · · Score: 1

    What's the relationship between openacs and java. Didn't ACS 4 introduce some java into the mix? Is ACSJ the only option for people who want something like ACS but with java integration?

    1. Re: openacs and java by JMarsden · · Score: 1
      Java is not needed or used in OpenACS 4.5beta1.

      There is discussion and experimentation with ways to add Java to the mix for those who need it. See the current thread about related AOLserver modules ns_java / ns_javablend and their current status, on the OpenACS.Org site.

      It's not especially relevant to the Java question, but I'm the person who tries to create Red Hat RPMs for OpenACS.

    2. Re: openacs and java by aquarian · · Score: 2

      Well, there's ACS and OpenACS. OpenACS started as a port of the original, Oracle-based ACS to an open source database, postgresql. At the time, that was the only difference, and they were both written in TCL. However, ArsDigita decided to rewrite the ACS in Java, mostly for "buzzword compliance" marketing reasons. They stopped developing the TCL ACS, so ACS 4.x is Java. But the OpenACS folks continued developing the TCL version, so OpenACS 4.x is still TCL.

      From what I understand, not all the Java ACS has been released as open source, though all the TCL stuff has.

  52. XXXXXX distro by LatJoor · · Score: 1
    The GUI on that has to be nice.

    Yeah, and it comes with an industrial-strength porn download manager and viewer.

  53. Some Facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    • In mid-to-late 2000, Matthew Szulik (Red Hat's CEO) was hot to acquire ArsDigita. He was extremely frustrated, and seen to punch a wall, when none of those appointed to review the technology could endorse using their technology (it had a lot to do with the way that ArsDigita relies too heavily on the general-purpose database to do the heavy lifting).
    • None of the people who reviewed the ArsDigita technology are at Red Hat any longer.
    • ArsDigita was funded by the same Venture Capitalist, Greylock, that Red Hat was. A Greylock representative (who himself owned as much stock in Red Hat as Greylock) sits on the board of Red Hat.
    I think that Red Hat is being pressured by Greylock to "clean up" their ArsDigita mess. In short, there's nothing to see here - move along.