Slashdot Mirror


Retail Sharp Zaurus Released

Arminius writes "It looks like Sharp has finally released the Linux based Sharp Zaurus SL-5500 for retail sale. This thing is so awesome! Other than only being able to listen to mp3's thru my headphones only, this thing blows away my iPaq 3835! It even has Opera as the web browser. "

307 comments

  1. Doh by yasth · · Score: 1, Redundant



    To fully experience the Sharp USA site, you need to have Version 4 or above of Internet Explorer or Netscape Navigator Version 4.x. Download Internet Explorer

    In Moz .99+

    --
    I'd do something interesting, but my server can't handle a slashdotting.
    1. Re:Doh by yasth · · Score: 1
      In the comments.
      The Sharp-USA site uses DHTML and other advanced techniques supported by Netscape Version 4 and Internet Explorer Version 4 and above. We are in the process of upgrading so that Netscape Version 6 will be supported. We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused you.


      --
      I'd do something interesting, but my server can't handle a slashdotting.
    2. Re:Doh by Sinfamous · · Score: 1

      So what browser was Taco using that he was able to see the site? Why would he post a site that a large amount of /. readers can't see? I'm using Netscape 6.2.1 and I can't even view the Sharp site.

    3. Re:Doh by mojo-raisin · · Score: 1

      Taco prefers win XP so he can play games.

    4. Re:Doh by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      not true - I can surf that site nicely in Omniweb 4.1b under MacOSX 10.1.3.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    5. Re:Doh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Advanced?

    6. Re:Doh by gregfortune · · Score: 2

      Erm, Konqi works just peachy....

    7. Re:Doh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and lynx sort of works to.

    8. Re:Doh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I experienced this same thing with Galeon 1.2.. switched my useragent to IE 5 for NT or IE6 for Win98, but to no avail. Out of curiosity, I switched off javascript, and the site works just fine. Guess they're not just trying to prevent people from using certain browsers, but are going out of their way to block people who are trying to trick the servers, too.

    9. Re:Doh by Steev · · Score: 2

      Hmmm...works fine in Konqueror 3.0 RC3.

    10. Re:Doh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More likely they're checking it with Javascript, not the useragent field your browser gives the server.

    11. Re:Doh by javajeff · · Score: 1

      Netscape 6.2.2 did not work for me. I had to copy the link address and use IE.

      Regards,

      javajeff

    12. Re:Doh by intnsred · · Score: 1
      Below is the URL to give Sharp feedback about their web site:

      http://sharpelectronics.com/global/ContactUsImprov eSite/1,1889,,00.html

      Let them have it...

    13. Re:Doh by kilrogg · · Score: 1

      I can't even get to that feedback page to tell them they're blocking me cause they are blocking me! Oh well, who cares.

    14. Re:Doh by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 2

      You might note the entire blurb was from Arminius - CmdrTaco didn't even add a pithy comment this time. As has been pointed out a number of times before... Slashdot editors obviously don't check all the URLs submitted.

    15. Re:Doh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    16. Re:Doh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're rather silly considering that the site works fine if you disable javascript (as that is how they check the browser version)

    17. Re:Doh by Radical+Rad · · Score: 2

      I am using Netscape Communicator 4.78 under Linux and the pages do not work correctly for me.

      Why would I buy a handheld pc device from them that I can't even use to properly browse their website when I need tech support?

      They can take their microsoft centric website and shove it.

      'No Sharp for you!' - The Sharp Nazi

    18. Re:Doh by foofboy · · Score: 1

      A great chance to try out Internet Explorer under Linux, just for giggles. Works like a charm. Tee-hee

    19. Re:Doh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Opera has the ability to identify itself as a number of browsers, including IE 5 and 3 versions of mozilla. I tested it as IE, and it worked on the site.

    20. Re:Doh by SCHecklerX · · Score: 2

      welp, that's a sale lost from me, at least. Idiots.

    21. Re:Doh by sPaKr · · Score: 1

      There has been some talk about the browser detection script.. here it is available at http://sharpelectronics.com/navscript.js There are several problems with.. it is rather childish.

    22. Re:Doh by NuShrike · · Score: 1

      Same thing for www.kfwb.com

      Seems to be a slow shutout of other browsers on the web these days..

    23. Re:Doh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ok the whinning about the browser is really a waste of time, if anyone of you works for a large company of Sharps scale you would know that the people who do the web site and the people who do the cool PDA's and toys are probly in seperate states or even countires not to mention it takes forever to fix things like that in such a large red tape environment... i work for a very large bank and its the same way

    24. Re:Doh by spike+hay · · Score: 1

      Yes. I will upgrade to internet explorer from Opera. It has all sorts of exciting features that Opera doesn't.

      1. Exciting new errors!!!

      2. Longer loading times!!

      3. Doesn't support Jave!!!

      I'm upgrading right now!! Since IE is not available on Linux I will now reformat my hard drive.

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
    25. Re:Doh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So let them look at the AGENT tag and figure out that it is Opera and send the html that they do for Ie. But changing the AGENT string to pretend it is Ie is bad because web statistics are skrewed in Ie's favor giving M$ Nazi's better arguments to their bosses to write html that only views in Ie.

    26. Re:Doh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yup

      sharp = cmdrtaco = idiot; // widely known

    27. Re:Doh by mrjohnson · · Score: 1

      turn off javascript.... the site looks fine.

    28. Re:Doh by dxkelly · · Score: 1

      Opera works just fine if you tell it to say it's exploder.

  2. Thanks for nothing Sharp... by reaper20 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    and the page asks me to upgrade my browser to NS4+ or IE.

    Hmmm ... I really don't see Sharp seriously supporting this little Linux venture of theirs - yet another "Linux" product from a company that talks the talk, but doesn't walk the walk.

    1. Re:Thanks for nothing Sharp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because they are using linux it doesnt mean they are aiming the product at idiot kids who get their fun off of using shitty software so they can feel important. They are aiming this product at the general public and guess what the general public uses Internet Explorer or Netscape. So stop fucking whining, this wasnt made for the open source community of dorks.

    2. Re:Thanks for nothing Sharp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      how can they be more supportive than building a device based on Linux ?
      Would you bet on Linux as much money as Sharp is investing in this product ?

    3. Re:Thanks for nothing Sharp... by ttfkam · · Score: 2

      Folks who want the Sharp product because it runs Linux which I assume makes the price point lower due to (lack of) licensing issues. I'm willing to bet that the makers of Opera made a sweet deal to Sharp to include their browser for cheap.

      Maybe developers want it because the development is easier because of the Linux base and Java support? At any rate, the developer that would be most interested in the Zaurus is one which already has *nix code to port, is familiar with *nix, etc. For web content, it would definitely be easier to run Opera on the desktop for the purposes of checking URLs for correctness/compatibility before having to check them all on the Zaurus. Ditto for page developement (edit->save->reload).

      The target audience includes folks who use IE, but it also most assuredly includes users of Opera and other "alternative" browsers and users of *nix platforms.

      --

      - I don't need to go outside, my CRT tan'll do me just fine.
    4. Re:Thanks for nothing Sharp... by gregfortune · · Score: 2

      Dunno what browser you guys are using, but Konqi works fine..

    5. Re:Thanks for nothing Sharp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh get over yourself. Sharp never claimed to be a "Linux" company. When 98% of your customers are running Windows, what do you expect them to support, lynx?

    6. Re:Thanks for nothing Sharp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Supporting lynx is an indicator that they have real, well-structured content. I know lynx doesn't support some "advanced" features like , but those aren't essential for making accessible and aesthetically appealing pages.

  3. "Upgrade" my browser??? by sjbrown · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Too bad the site doesn't work under Galeon. When will these brain-dead web designers realize that they're just creating a bigger problem by trying to block browsers? Most of the time they don't correctly detect browser capabilities, causing users to misreport what kind of browser they're using.

    AARGH!

  4. it has the Opera browser? by dat00ket · · Score: 5, Funny
    Opera browser, huh?

    "To fully experience the Sharp USA site, you need to have Version 4 or above of Internet Explorer or Netscape Navigator Version 4.x."

    Great way to make the customer feel good about buying their product.

    1. Re:it has the Opera browser? by BlueGecko · · Score: 5, Funny

      If it makes you feel any better, they're also rejecting Mozilla and NS 6.2. So when you see you need Netscape Navigator 4.x, they apparently mean 4.x PERIOD, not 4.x or better.

    2. Re:it has the Opera browser? by Varitek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Tell them why their site sucks.

      http://sharpelectronics.com/global/ContactUsImpr ov eSite/1,1889,,00.html

      (you may have to turn off javascript to get there, of course)

    3. Re:it has the Opera browser? by ender81b · · Score: 2

      It would also help if they would learn how to code HTML

      Validate Check

      For those of you too lazy to look, something like 50 errors. Go Sharp.

    4. Re:it has the Opera browser? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you really want to see it, disable javascript. Yeah, it's stupid.

    5. Re:it has the Opera browser? by global_diffusion · · Score: 1

      On an upnote, this was commented out in their source:

      The Sharp-USA site uses DHTML and other advanced techniques supported by Netscape Version 4 and Internet Explorer Version 4 and above. We are in the process of upgrading so that Netscape Version 6 will be supported. We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused you.

      (I was looking for the "webmaster's" email).

    6. Re:it has the Opera browser? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod up! At least they know better and are trying...

    7. Re:it has the Opera browser? by lanner · · Score: 1


      My vote; Sharp sucks. What a way to meet my enthusiasm when going to look at their product. I guess I will just see it some other time instead.

      I can only hope that the Sharp webmaster's superiors are somehow informed of this incident. It makes their company look stupid in front of the technical crowd.

    8. Re:it has the Opera browser? by Aanallein · · Score: 1

      Since it's commented out, it suggests they once showed that notice to Netscape 6 users, but have stopped doing so. Which in turn suggests they are no longer even trying...

    9. Re:it has the Opera browser? by flacco · · Score: 5, Funny
      Tell them why their site sucks.

      http://sharpelectronics.com/global/ContactUsImprov eSite/1,1889,,00.html

      Oh, I already did. They should have an interesting read when they investigate why their http access error log is so large.

      Sharp website designer: "Hmmm, 404's everywhere. I wonder why someone keeps requesting a page named 'http://www.sharpelectronics.com/LEARN-TO-WRITE-CR OSS-BROWSER-SITES-YOU-WORTHLESS-LITTLE-MONKEY'..."

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    10. Re:it has the Opera browser? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you're cool. Retarded slashkiddies. Oi.

    11. Re:it has the Opera browser? by frankie · · Score: 2

      They should have an interesting read when they investigate why their http access error log is so large.

      This is a great idea, but they won't be impressed if all of the requests are from the same IP address in a single "visit". That's why I think we should all join in. Ten thousand separate IPs all hitting this link ought to get their attention...

  5. Damn browser compatibility! by fktup · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Sharp wants me to "upgrade" my browser from mozilla 0.9.9 to Internet Exploder or Netscape Navigator. I wonder if Opera is also antiquated :/

  6. Great... by redhatbox · · Score: 3, Funny


    Quoting from the spec page: "Edit text or e-mail effortlessly with a standard QWERTY keyboard."

    I searched and searched, but somehow couldn't find the option to purchase the 1-foot tall man add-on module to assist in data entry. I would have bought it, but the keyboard's so small... ;).

    1. Re:Great... by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      I've used the device, the keyboard's not bad at all! Here's a tip though: Drag your Super Nintendo out and get your thumbs warmed up.

      I want one. Compared to a Pocket PC, it doesn't feel like a Fisher Price 'My First PDA.'

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:Great... by jenkin+sear · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I can interest you in a twelve inch pianist? :)

      --
      What a strange bird is the pelican, his beak can hold more than his belly can.
    3. Re:Great... by redhatbox · · Score: 1


      "Perhaps I can interest you in a twelve inch pianist? :)"

      Only if your pianist can also play the world's smallest violin (while doing data entry on the Sharp Zaurus at 60 wpm). ;)

  7. forget it by mnordstr · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I seriously thought this might be something worth investing in, but "To fully experience the Sharp USA site, you need to have Version 4 or above of Internet Explorer or Netscape Navigator Version 4.x. Download Internet Explorer" on MZ .9.9 really made any kind of decision easy... Forget it.

  8. Sharp & Opera? by StuffYourReligion · · Score: 1

    Nice. They use Opera on the Zaurus, but try Opera to access their web site and see that their web developers aren't so open-minded:

    "To fully experience the Sharp USA site, you need to have Version 4 or above of Internet Explorer or Netscape Navigator Version 4.x."

    To "partially" experience the Sharp USA site, keep reloading this error page. It's all the experience they're offering.

    ...and of course they only have to link to download the Beastly Exploder.

    --
    I have no special gift, I am only passionately curious. --Albert Einstein
    1. Re:Sharp & Opera? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Face it OSS Twit, IE *is* better than that part timing piece of shit Opera. They used Opera because they wanted something cheap. And you pay for what you get.

    2. Re:Sharp & Opera? by mkoenecke · · Score: 1

      Excellent point. And Internet Explorer costs... uh, isn't that free? Oops.

      --
      TANSTAAFL
    3. Re:Sharp & Opera? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, Opera isn't OSS and it is a much better browser than IE is.

      Why?
      1) The ability to disable pop-up and pop-under windows.
      2) The ability to load multiple pages into a session and then save that session when you close Opera so when you open it again, all of your pages are right where you left them.
      3) Better adherance to the specifications outlined by the WC3.
      4) Mouse gestures.
      5) Runs on many more operating systems than IE.
      6) Small, fast and stable.

      Just to name a few.

      Why don't you learn something and strive for an understanding before you go flapping your gums?

    4. Re:Sharp & Opera? by hkmwbz · · Score: 1
      As people have already pointed out, Opera is not open-source.

      Apart from that, Opera Embedded is superior to Pocket IE simply because it has the exact same core as the desktop versions of Opera. With Pocket IE, you get a less functional version of IE. With Opera, you get everything in one small package. The same support for HTML, CSS, etc.

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
  9. I thought we had gotten past the browser thing by Unruly · · Score: 1

    http://sharpelectronics.com/browser.html

    Apparently Mozilla 0.9.9 is not more current than Netscape 4.x -- bravo sharp, bravo indeed. At least Microsoft is trying to push something (their browser)...

    >:(

  10. Bad by Brontosaurus+Jim · · Score: 0, Troll

    Damn, this is kinda crappy. Sure it's nice that they put Linux on it, and Opera. But isn't linux about choice? They're locking you into to one browser, and the wrong on at that.

    Hello? There is already an Open Source Browser: Mozilla. just like there is an open source directory lister: ls. Any other tools are kind redundant, and a waste of time.

    It's really just that these companies don't really _get_ linux, and just see it as a viable medium to screw us consumers.

    I think we should amend the GPL and close the loopholes that allow open source software to be sold for money! They've been abused to long!

    1. Re:Bad by TeamFXML · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ummm.. Konqueror is available for the Zaurus here along with many other GPL utilities.

      Please do some research before painting with a broad brush.

    2. Re:Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think we should amend the GPL and close the loopholes that allow open source software to be sold for money!

      Typical /. Communist Thinking (TSDCT)

      Fuck you. You may love your mommy and daddies basement very much, but some of us have children and wives and aging parents. We'd like to make some money thank you very much.

    3. Re:Bad by CoolVibe · · Score: 2
      They're locking you into to one browser, and the wrong on at that.

      Well, actually, they try to lock you in 2 browsers, and somehow, Konq on my NetBSD/macppc displays the pages fine. No UserAgent tweaking. Maybe they fixed that 'problem' after seeing that browser-upgrade page being hit hard so much from this place?

    4. Re:Bad by Brontosaurus+Jim · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but where's Mozilla?

      My point is really that this sort of thing has gone on long enough... I'm tired of these half-assed linux implementations. If (god forbid) there was a Linux Corporation, they'd sue the hell out of the Zaurus for Dillution of Trademark. Since we can't sue em, the only recourse we have as consumers is to simply deny them any congradulations for their product.

      This device isn't pro linux, it's just contributing to Linux's non-homogeniuty. The average person will see this and thing _this_ is linux, even though it doesn't even run Mozilla.

      Ludicris.

    5. Re:Bad by spencerogden · · Score: 2

      How is a system without mozilla not a Linux system? It uses the linux kernel, what more do you want?

    6. Re:Bad by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

      Listen, this is just part of the natural evolution of software. If you're right, then it will fail, but perhaps a good quality will emerge into Linux gene-pool before it dies out. This this will continue and must continue or Linux will never improve. QED.

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    7. Re:Bad by Brontosaurus+Jim · · Score: 2

      If we ever want linux on the desktop, we all have to present a _unified_ front for the user. We can't have these semi-functional systems. My question for you is: How is a system that can't run mozilla equivelant to a linux system?

    8. Re:Bad by NotAnotherReboot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Opera has been proven to work GREAT as an EMBEDDED browser, while Mozilla is great, I'm not sure it is as good as Opera in the embedded marked. Just because it's open source doesn't mean it's better, even when you're using Linux.

    9. Re:Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You may love your mommy and daddies basement very much, but some of us have children and wives and aging parents. We'd like to make some money thank you very much"

      Typical /. Capitalist Thinking(TSCST)

      I'm sure you'd love to make tons of money, I bet you'd love it if you were living in a palace while everyone else's families were in the gutters. It would serve them right, wouldn't it? After how they treated you? Screw them. An eye for an eye right? Your American dream is another's American nightmare.

    10. Re:Bad by mocm · · Score: 1

      Ever thought about the fact that mozilla may be too large for the 16MB Rom. For the ipaq they are using dillo, so be glad that they include a usable browser. Although, I don't agree with theri choice of qt and java as developement platform, it probably
      made the most sense for them at the time.
      Following the corporate need to be able to blame someone, they went with Lineo, Trolltech and Opera in spite of the fact that they could have everything for free. At least it provides a good starting point for everyone who wants to get into Linux programming as well as for the experienced Linux user who will have no problem to get mozilla, X11 or whatever to run on the Zaurus.

      --
      ***Quis custodiet ipsos custodes***
    11. Re:Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well excuse us for trying to make a living. I'd laugh at you, if you weren't such a blood-soaked revolutionary.

      Face it, you're a tool of the reds, bent on bringing a hasty end to the human race, simultaionusly spouting views of freedom and equailty, and killing millions upon millions of innocents. Stalin anyone?

      I bet you have a picture of Her Furher Stalin in your dorm room. Yeah, 10 to 1 you're a college student, where the reds have a lot of professors on the dole. Lots of money goes to those that talk you into it. Some commies.

      You dirty bastards can't even keep a straight front. You have no idea what youre doing, except for providing for the bloody downfall of teh world.

      Maybe my dream is someones nightmare, but your dream is the worlds nightmare.

    12. Re:Bad by hackerhue · · Score: 2

      Hold on. Let me get this straight. First you say that Linux is about choice, and then you bash Sharp for using Opera instead of Mozilla?

      And what is wrong with selling GPL'ed software for money? Even the FSF does that.

      --

      To get something done, a committee should consist of no more than three persons, two of them absent.

    13. Re:Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The world is already a nightmare! You think the arabian conflicts are really about religion? Oil--->Money--->American Greed!

      And terrorism: People don't blow themselves up for no reason. We're destroying their lifestyles with cultural attacks, as well as military. If the world doesn't conform to our standards, then they must be terrorists.

      Our imperialistic dogma resembles that of the third reich.

      I bet you drive around in your gas-chugging car, polluting the airwaves, laughing at the homeless people as you splash water on them. You probably haven't questioned a thing in your life, you ignorant white trash. Go back to your trailer pig.

    14. Re:Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      polluting the airwaves

      LOL! Who do you think I am... Justin from N'Sync? I think you mean "air" dipshit.

    15. Re:Bad by nagora · · Score: 2
      There is already an Open Source Browser: Mozilla.

      Pity it's shit, slow, fat, and four years late. As you say, it's just as well we have a choice.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    16. Re:Bad by nagora · · Score: 2
      I'm tired of these half-assed linux implementations.

      I got tired of Mozilla's half-assed browser implementations some time ago.

      thing _this_ is linux, even though it doesn't even run Mozilla.

      So? Are you worried that people might think that there are high quality applications available for Linux?

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    17. Re:Bad by nagora · · Score: 2
      My question for you is: How is a system that can't run mozilla equivelant to a linux system?

      "Doesn't" is not the same as "can't". A system that can't run Mozilla is either not Linux or just less than 1Ghz+512M RAM. A system that doesn't run Mozilla is simply showing good taste.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    18. Re:Bad by Osty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Following the corporate need to be able to blame someone, they went with Lineo, Trolltech and Opera in spite of the fact that they could have everything for free.

      s/to be able to blame someone/to be able to have competent support without having to invest in the non-profitable area of building their own expertise or relying on the so-called "Linux community" (that may be fine for individual users, but no company with any regard for its own existence would rely solely on that community for support.)/. In other words, just because there are free (as in price) alternatives to those they chose, that doesn't mean there are no associated costs. The basic equation would be "if price(service contract) + price(licensing fees) < salary(programmer)*n + salary(support)*m + projected loss due to late market entry; then buy from Lineo/Trolltech/Opera; else DIY", where 'n' is the projected number of programmers necessary to duplicate any specific effort already done by companies such as Lineo or Trolltech that have not been made freely available and 'm' is the projected number of support personal. Both of these are above and beyond any current programmers or support employees.

    19. Re:Bad by mocm · · Score: 1

      Well, at least some of them were redundant, with all the work already done for the ipaq and an existing debian distribution for arm and familiar distribution for the ipaq.
      I am sure they overpaid, but that's their problem.
      In the long run, building (or even buying) their own expertise in the form of some competent programmers or only Linux savy consultants would probably save them money. But who thinks for the long run.
      What do they need Lineo and Trolltech for?

      --
      ***Quis custodiet ipsos custodes***
    20. Re:Bad by rusty+spoon · · Score: 1

      If it doesn't work out for Sharp then no-one else will try it for many years. The Linux advocates better get over to Sharp and show their support by spending some of that hard earnt cash. Trust me; If you don't then a Linux PDA will be a historic monument of failure.

    21. Re:Bad by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      Maybe he did mean "air". But if he meant airwaves, I think he was making an insightful point.

    22. Re:Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You can't run Mozilla on a PDA. Mozilla is a resource pig. It's not Sharps fault that Mozilla is a bloated pig. If you want to run Mozilla, get yourself a dual athlon, don't whine that your PDA, your toaster, and Microwave don't run it.

    23. Re:Bad by Osty · · Score: 1

      In the long run, building (or even buying) their own expertise in the form of some competent programmers or only Linux savy consultants would probably save them money. But who thinks for the long run.

      I don't buy it. I can see only two cases where that would be true.

      1. The first is when the recurring support and license costs, in total, would exceed the costs of hiring and retaining several employees (depending on the scope of the project, anywhere between 3 and 20 people may be needed), including projected raises and bonuses for these people, as well as reasonable benefits. I could see this scenario working, and it falls right into the equation I gave.
      2. The second scenario deals with one or more of the partner companies going under. If you're trying to hedge your bets against such a circumstance, then that means you believe such a thing is likely to happen to your potential partners, and thus probably shouldn't be considering them as partners anyway (alternatively, it means the market you've chosen is not sustainable, and you'll probably fold as well even if you keep everything in-house). Given that scenario, and assuming your company is still solvent, then it's trivial to hire the failed company's employees and purchase that company's IP. Speaking of the long-run, this will still turn out better -- If it were cheaper for your company to build your own expertise from the start, then you would have chosen that path to begin with. Assuming it's not, and you didn't, then this scenario only moves you from the licensing path to the internal expertise path. You've saved money in the long run, because for the amount of time you spent as a licensee, you saved the difference between the cost of being self-reliant and being a licensee. Now you're forced to become self-reliant, so you no longer save the difference, but you still have the past savings to show that over the long run money was saved.


      Now, obviously many companies don't run on this logic, but larger companies generally do, and Sharp is a larger company.

    24. Re:Bad by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      I know... Is a Windows box not a Windows box unless it can get 150 fps on Jedi Knight II at 1600x1200?

      And Mozilla is an awful browser. Galeon is a step in the right direction. I like my browsers to be just browser, not mail clients/newsreaders/gopher clients, though...and dillo fits nicely.

  11. Won't accept Opera? by young-earth · · Score: 2, Funny
    I tried clicking on the link in the story, and got

    To fully experience the Sharp USA site, you need to have Version 4 or
    above of Internet Explorer or Netscape Navigator Version 4.x. Download
    Internet Explorer

    The irony of this is that the Zaurus has Opera built in to it..
    1. Re:Won't accept Opera? by rusty+spoon · · Score: 1

      All this petty bitching about browsers. Sharp appear to have done a good job, let's hope the petty bashing of browser 'choice' on the PDA and petty limitations don't get in the way of Lunix zealots showing support for Sharps brave move.

      For goodness sake quit moaning about petty shit and get a look at the bigger picture.

  12. Do they even know that by fraczak · · Score: 1

    It's hard to believe. I think that they do not even know about their web page problem.

    I cannot send them an email because I cannot access the page, ... Catch 22.

    1. Re:Do they even know that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You guys are assuming that the web designers actually talk to Information Architects or have a functional spec for browser compat... they were probably hired as consultants and given very little direction and project specification.

      Besides most designers just dont take the time to actually LEARN HTML... silly, but true. So getting them to worry about your little used browser is a long-shot at best.

      I do this for a living and pride myself on at least TRYING to get the site owners to care about possible other browsers, yes even text browser you lynx guys :), alternate image texts and the like... they dont... no money in it.

      its gotta make them $$$ to support the minority browsers... they have too little vision.

  13. Works fine in Konq here on NetBSD/macppc... by CoolVibe · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Nuff said.. Maybe they fixed it?

    1. Re:Works fine in Konq here on NetBSD/macppc... by ttfkam · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Have you changed your browser agent string into making it think you have IE?

      Not that I'm saying for sure that you have (I'm not) but as a general message for the folks who read this post, DON'T CHANGE YOUR USER AGENT STRING! It only makes IE look more common than it already is. If all of the users of Mozilla, Opera and Konqueror pretend that they're IE, webmasters will have no idea that anyone other than IE users come to their site and be more inclined to write IE-only content.

      Can't see their site without changing the user agent string? This is where your principles come into play. Do you actually care about and support the "alternative" browsers or do you not really care at all. There is very little middle ground here. The choice is of course yours, but principles are not important while they are convenient. They are only important when you stick by them when they are significantly incovenient.

      --

      - I don't need to go outside, my CRT tan'll do me just fine.
    2. Re:Works fine in Konq here on NetBSD/macppc... by CoolVibe · · Score: 2

      FYI, No I didn't tweak any UserAgent stuff. It just displays. I even checked with tcpdump, and Konq sends his regular stuff (The normal Konq useragent string)

    3. Re:Works fine in Konq here on NetBSD/macppc... by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      this is a valid point - how does your browser identify itself? My Omniweb 4.1b gives this string "Mozilla/4.5 (compatible; Omniweb/332; Mac_PowerPC)". That's as close as I can get to the truth without being barred from half the web. Shouldn't ALL browsers identify as "W3C certified" ?

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    4. Re:Works fine in Konq here on NetBSD/macppc... by Jahf · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Current marketing reports already show IE (all versions totalled) to account for > 90% of the market. By changing your user-agent to look like IE, you just give it more weight in the market.

      --
      It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
  14. Sharpening Opera by StuffYourReligion · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, at least Sharp's web devs aren't too thorough in their browser bigotry, er... detection; Opera spoofing as IE works just fine (but identify as Mozilla 3.0, 4.76 or 5.0 and you're out of luck).

    --
    I have no special gift, I am only passionately curious. --Albert Einstein
    1. Re:Sharpening Opera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The average "web developer" is incompetent. Usually they are ignorant, other times just lazy.

      Even pages designed and tested for IE exclusively will look completely fucked up if you do something as radical as changing your defualt font size.

  15. I love mine! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I picked up one of these at Fry's a couple days ago and am very impressed with it so far. The form factor is very nice, and the Linux OS powering the PDA is very peppy (running on a 206 Mhz StrongARM, a very fast chip compared to the competition).

    What I love most about this PDA though is its openness. Need to get a file onto the PDA? Use NFS, scp, ftp, http, etc.. Want to develop an application for the PDA? Use Java, Qt, or C, all with open API's and no NDA nonsense.

    Some good places for more information:
    Zaurus Zone has some nice (but often too busy) forums. And of course the Sourceforge project for Zaurus.

    In short, I love this PDA. I will try to answer any questions people may have here about it.

    1. Re:I love mine! by Quickening · · Score: 1

      Lucky B_ Ordered mine the day they came out - March 26th. Still waiting.

      I can't find any reviews on the digital camera attachment. Have you heard anything?

      Also bot USB cradle and 802.11b attachment - hoping I could use a data-enabled cellular phone for other access...

      --
      tcboo
    2. Re:I love mine! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, It cost me nothing, Frys has less NAZI sale boys, i just dropped it into my jacket (after taking it out of the box) and walked out.

    3. Re:I love mine! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A very peppy processor that MATCHES the competition. Anyway.. you're obviously an idiot for purchasing ANYTHING from Fry's. Boycott Fry's.

    4. Re:I love mine! by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      206Mzh StrongARM? IIRC, that's barely faster than Apple's Newton, a PDA that's been around forever.

    5. Re:I love mine! by toriver · · Score: 1
      206Mzh StrongARM? IIRC, that's barely faster than Apple's Newton, a PDA that's been around forever.

      I seem to recall that being one of the reasons why it cost a fortune, too. Episode #x in Apple's continuing saga of "how to kill a product through pricing".

      I do wonder what would have happened if Sun had actually manufactured and sold the *7 SPARC-based PDA that the Green project (which begat Java) created...

  16. Other links by phr1 · · Score: 4, Informative
    I got the developer version of this machine for $199 at Java One last week. Specs and info are at developer.sharpsec.com.

    The thing is nice, though not the hacker's dream that I hoped for. For example, the apps are rough around the edges and source code for them doesn't seem to be available.

    My biggest gripe about the hardware is the stylus is too small. I'm using an iPaq stylus with it which is a lot better.

    Also, it's not clear whether there's audio input. There's a voice recorder program that says plug in a mono mic with 3.5mm plug, but there's only one jack that size and it's intended for stereo headphones. I've never heard of multiplexing a jack between headphones and a mic. I'll try it with a mic but I think the software and docs were written for some different piece of hardware.

    1. Re:Other links by jmorse · · Score: 2

      You have to plug into the headphone jack to record.

      --

      "You done taken a wrong turn."
      -Bill McKinney, in Deliverance
    2. Re:Other links by GrouchoMarx · · Score: 2

      I've got the Developer model (SL-5000d). Yes, the headphone jack and microphone jack are the same thing, I've tried it and the quality both ways is excellent. I don't know if it does full duplex, though, as I don't have the right equipment to plug into it to find out. If it is full duplex, though, a GSM CF card would make a highly interesting addition.....

      --

      --GrouchoMarx
      Card-carrying member of the EFF, FSF, and ACLU. Are you?

    3. Re:Other links by treke · · Score: 3, Informative

      The source for many of the applications (or at least the code they were based off of) is available from the QPE website. http://qpe.sourceforge.net

      There are two related project to improve the applications and replace closed source applications with open source equivalants: OPIE and Open Zaurus.

      For the time being OPIE will only run on Ipaqs, but OpenZaurus will be using it as the environment in the future

    4. Re:Other links by sl956 · · Score: 2, Informative
      For example, the apps are rough around the edges and source code for them doesn't seem to be available.
      OpenZaurus is a community version of the root filesystem / romimage for the Sharp Zaurus SL-5000d PDA (the developper version you could buy at LinuxWorld or JavaOne prior to the official launch of the Zaurus). The current release is beta 2.6 and it is fairly useable. A SL-5500 version will probably be released soon (there are very few hardware differences).
      On a side note, you should have a look on the Zaurus-general mailing list archive for all your questions about this fabulous PDA.

      Disclaimer : I'm probably biased as I bought one at LinuxWorld, and I'm in loooove with it. ;-)
    5. Re:Other links by Quickening · · Score: 1

      Here's the brochure, which is not blocked.

      --
      tcboo
    6. Re:Other links by RevAaron · · Score: 2

      My biggest gripe about the hardware is the stylus is too small. I'm using an iPaq stylus with it which is a lot better.

      Hold up here. The Zaurus has a *smaller* stylus than the iPAQs? Man! The iPAQ's stylus is too small, for me. Then again, I prefer a stylus that is the size of a real pen, not a toothpick. Like on the Newton. But I don't want to carry an extra stylus in my pocket, too high of a risk tha I'd loose it. Perhaps I use a PDA differently than most people, and that's why I prefer a real stylus... I actually take notes and write on a PDA, program, use it like a computer, not a hideiously overpriced organizer. To each her own! :)

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
  17. If you're using Opera ... by e1en0r · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you're using Opera, set it to identify itself as MSIE 5 and the Sharp site should work for you. It did for me.

    1. Re:If you're using Opera ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want a solution, NOT a woraround !!!

      No Sharp ...
      "There is a difference between knowing the path, and walking it"
      ( Morpheus - The Matrix )

    2. Re:If you're using Opera ... by PlaysWithMatches · · Score: 2

      Pretty stupid that it doesn't recognize Mozilla as being >= Netscape 4.x. You'd expect a bit more from these guys, seeing as they have a Java/Linux handheld out and all.

      --

      Mozilla's a nice operating system, but it needs a better browser.
    3. Re:If you're using Opera ... by Radical+Rad · · Score: 2

      Actually Mozilla is >= to Netscape 4.x in name only.

      It uses a significantly different Document Object Model so it's not merely a matter of sending the same codes to it that you would to Netscape 4.x.

      Navigator 4.x used a Netscape proprietary [LAYER] tag for DHTML while Mozilla conforms to the newer HTML specs.

  18. Upgrade Your Browser by e_n_d_o · · Score: 1, Troll

    Apparently Mozilla 0.9.9 isn't good enough to view sharpelectronics.com. They recommend I upgrade to MSIE 4.

    I let them know that my decision to purchase an SL-5500 is based solely on them letting me in with whatever browser I want to use. (I had to use Netscape 4.x to get to their feedback page) So far there has been no response.

    It's absurd to lock people out of a Web site based on browser-type in the hopes that folks using ancient ("third-generation") Web browsers are actually going to spend 17 hours downloading the latest version on their 14.4 modems.

    1. Re:Upgrade Your Browser by Radical+Rad · · Score: 2
      It's absurd to lock people out of a Web site based on browser-type in the hopes that folks using ancient ("third-generation") Web browsers are actually going to spend 17 hours downloading the latest version on their 14.4 modems.

      You're right. Anyone still using Netscape Gold 3.0 would almost certainly still be running some old 386sx/33 with 4MB of RAM. Can't be many of those left.

      So the "upgrade recommendation" is really something else isn't it?

      PS. I hope whoever marked your post as a troll gets spanked hard in meta-moderation.

  19. lovely pda... by xo0m · · Score: 1

    too bad they dont have that slide out qwerty for any of the microsoft based pocket pcs...

    1. Re:lovely pda... by RevAaron · · Score: 2

      The keyboard is just something to make up for the flaw of not having real HWR. I used to use a Newton 2100u for everything. I had a keyboard, but almost never used it. Why? A smallish keyboard (the Newton's was a lot bigger, and more useful than the Zaurus' kb) is a helluva lot slower than using real HWR like on the Newton, or CalliGrapher on a WinCE device. No, real HWR isn't character recognition like Graffiti or on the Zaurus.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    2. Re:lovely pda... by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      amen - I have found that almost no-one I meet has any idea how good the HWR was on the Newton. When I see Graffiti I despair at it's inadequacies. I still maintain that the Newton is the only computer that you can usefully use in the back of a taxi on a bumpy road. Apple's greatest missed opportunity - though I don't blame them for saving the company by killing it.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    3. Re:lovely pda... by RevAaron · · Score: 2

      They didn't save the company by killing it. It appears that Steve simply had some grudges, and generally thought it was worthless. Newton was spun off as a seperate company (Newton, Inc) and the MP2100 was finally turning a profit. Apple bought it back, and killed it. Hardly to save the company. :(

      I've been using an iPAQ 3150 to replace my Newton. Having CalliGrapher helps some, but the size of the screen, and general lack of consistency in PocketPC (man, I can't understand how people used WinCE 2!) really detracts from the experience.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    4. Re:lovely pda... by Psion · · Score: 2

      Bzzzt! Sorry, but I've been playing with my new SL-5500 and guess what? Handwriting recognition is one of five ways to get text into the unit. On-screen keyboard (in two flavors), pickboard, handwriting recognition, Unicode selection chart, and that wonderful hardware keyboard.

      And that isn't Graffiti that's being used for handwriting recognition, but a trainable algorithm that actually recognizes multi-stroke letters!

    5. Re:lovely pda... by RevAaron · · Score: 2

      Heh, bzzzt! Sorry! You're talking about character recognition, not handwriting recognition. It doesn't matter if it's Graffiti, Jot, something programmable, it's still just character recognition, not real *handwriting* recognition.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    6. Re:lovely pda... by Psion · · Score: 2

      Bzzt! Bzzt! And exactly what is the functional difference, hmm? You're not being forced to learn a new alphabet, it learns your particular style, and it keeps up very nicely. The only improvement would be the ability to recognize an entire string of characters at once, and I'd really rather not have to scroll back through an entire line of text to correct a single recognition error at the start of it.

      Once you get out of the Graffiti trap, the differences become trivial.

    7. Re:lovely pda... by RevAaron · · Score: 2

      There's a huge functional difference between writing an entire word and writing a character. You've obviously never actually used a real HWR recognition scheme. If you had a PDA capable of using one, I'd recomend one. Perhaps you have a friend with some surplus PocketPC toy, or a Newton to spare for a few weeks? The difference in writing speed between writing it down, char by char, rather than word by word is quite signifigant. The human brain can be trained to break words down into characters, but it's still a lot more natural and fluid to write words.

      I've tried many means of getting information into a computer using a pen: on screen keyboards, in Qwerty and Fital; Graffiti; Jot; various programmable single- or multiple-stroke means (no, it's nothing new) using various X11 programs, CharRecog, and Genie before I ever had the pleasure of using real *handwriting* recognition, on the Newton and CalliGrapher.

      I'm not trying to make you feel like you wasted your money on your Zaurus. You like it, that's great. It's just a shame that you're being held back by a lack of a better means for using the device, and that the device itself isn't being used to it's full potential.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    8. Re:lovely pda... by Psion · · Score: 2

      RevAaron, how else do you write a word other than by one character at a time? Maybe I slept through a class or two in grammar school, but as best as I can recall, there was no training in writing a whole word at once. (There may be a preconception bias at work here: I abandoned "cursive" handwriting ages ago because printing is more legible and precise. This is actually rather common in engineering and other tech-related industries. Now if you're trying to make a case for a system that recognizes cursive writing rather than printing, I'll concede that point, but you're still forming your words one-letter-at-a-time, connecting strokes and fancy swirls notwithstanding.)

      "...lack of better means for using the device..." That's what the keyboard is for. I've typed much faster than I could ever write for years, and although this pygmy wonder on the Zaurus is a little tough, I'm already getting a handle on touch-typing with it. This thing has five different ways to get information into it, I can even enter data one-handed while standing -- I'm not being held back from using it at all!

    9. Re:lovely pda... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somewhere along the way from you brain to your KEYBOARD, you started mistaking your opinion for reality. I personally hate to write, and about the only time I do anymore is to sign checks to pay bills. The "design flaw" (in my opinion) of all previous PDA's is the archaic utilization of some form of handwriting (be it words or graffiti) as the only means to get data into the device, which I hate. I love my little Zaurus, I might not type 80 wpm on it, but I can TYPE, which is what I like. (And I can tap-type, use the pick bar, or -ugh- write in the thing if I'm too lazy or its too inconvenient to slide open the keyboard.)

      It is annoying (again, in my opinion) that people assume their preferences makes a product have a "design flaw". Want handwriting, buy a device that you like that does a better job, and let people who want keyboards have keyboards - they aren't design flaws, it's diversity!

    10. Re:lovely pda... by xo0m · · Score: 1

      sure its diversity!!! now if only the diversity among qwerty handhelds applied to pocket pcs...

  20. They were selling these this past week @ Java 1 by Lysol · · Score: 2, Interesting

    for $299! Came with 802.11 wireless card as well. Would have been a nice 'toy', but hard to justify. My PalmVII just collects dust now.

  21. Actually for $199 by phr1 · · Score: 2
    The 802.11 card was $100 extra, not such a great deal. I bought mine for $199 without the card.

    Note that it's the developer version (SL-5000D) not the retail SL-5500D. The main difference I can notice is the dev. version has 32M of RAM and the retail version has 64M.

  22. Supports only Windoze Media files?!!?! by anticypher · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Not that the site likes my browsers all that much[netscape4.78 or IE4.0 on slowlaris], but from poking around it seems to only play Windoze Media files, but not .wav, mp3, or any other kind of audio file. Synch is proprietary, and the only synch agents run on windoze, etc.

    There may be some linux on this, but it seems to be completely crippled as a walkman/rio replacement. There are a ton of other limitations, and no mention of linux pretty much anywhere on the official site.

    Until I see some glowing reviews from independent sources, I'm sticking with pencil and notebook :-)

    the AC

    --
    Hemos is like...sci-fi fans;he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on
    1. Re:Supports only Windoze Media files?!!?! by mocm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just use madplay, ssh, rsync or whatever other Linux/Unix tool you like.
      They probably don't mention them because they think people (i.e. Windoze user) might get confused.
      Have a look at linuxdevices.com for reviews.

      --
      ***Quis custodiet ipsos custodes***
    2. Re:Supports only Windoze Media files?!!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, did you actually look at the product at all? Not only doesn't it play Windows Media files, it plays MP3, wav, mpeg, etc.

      And yes, it syncs for windows and all the sync software is for windows. If you dig around the web a little, you can get the linux version. Does that suck? Yes. Is it better than nothing? Yes.

      Tired of freakin idiots who don't read... sigh.

    3. Re:Supports only Windoze Media files?!!?! by GrouchoMarx · · Score: 3, Informative
      WMA? No, the Zaurus plays mp3, wav, and mpeg-4/DivX video files. No, it doesn't do Ogg yet, but I understand someone is working on it.

      As for a review, I wrote a long review of the SL-5000d (the developer edition of the SL-5500) back in January. Linkage below.

      http://www.infosync.no/show.php?id=1292

      --

      --GrouchoMarx
      Card-carrying member of the EFF, FSF, and ACLU. Are you?

  23. IE and doc. Sharp has a lot to learn by mocm · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Not only do they require IE to access their web site, they also sent me a .doc file to apply for the
    Zaurus developer program. Well, I wrote them an e-mail and explained that it was strange to require a Linux developer to read and fillout a proprietary M$ document. After 2 weeks they resent it as PDF.
    So maybe we should just ask them politely to change their web site's policy regarding browsers, so that they may reach a larger portion of potential buyers of the Zaurus.
    After all, it should be made clear that web sites should be writen according to standards and not so that just some browser can display them.

    --
    ***Quis custodiet ipsos custodes***
    1. Re:IE and doc. Sharp has a lot to learn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about the 500 other posts that have already bitched about them not supporting Mozilla.

    2. Re:IE and doc. Sharp has a lot to learn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this redundant? Obviously the person who modded this as redundant didn't even read the post.

    3. Re:IE and doc. Sharp has a lot to learn by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 2

      What was *not* redundant was the fact that the developer application was in *.doc format. It does rather seem that Sharp isn't targeting us at all.

  24. Available at Fry's Electronics. by e_n_d_o · · Score: 3, Informative

    The SL-5500 is on display at Fry's Electronics (I saw it in Fountain Valley, CA).

    If you buy one there, don't let them make you suffer the Final Indignity.

    1. Re:Available at Fry's Electronics. by cosyne · · Score: 1

      If you buy one there, don't let them make you suffer the Final Indignity

      OT, but you don't have to stop for them to count the number of objects in your bag which are beyond their comprehension (wow, that's a lot of little microchip thiniges). I'll usually cooperate if the person is standing around, but i refuse to wait in line for this "service" so if they're busy "helping" other customers i just walk through. Of course if you didn't pay for something it becomes theft once you go through the door and then they can stop you...

  25. Blocking Netscape 6; hyp-Opera-sy by yerricde · · Score: 2

    They are aiming this product at the general public and guess what the general public uses Internet Explorer or Netscape.

    You said Netscape? Sharp blocks Netscape.

    I am using the web browser whose codebase will become either Netscape 6.3 or Netscape 6.5. For practical purposes, I am using Netscape, even though it has an M instead of an N in its throbber.

    My neighbor is using a web browser with the same codebase as the one that Sharp ships with its device. He is using Opera. How hypocritical of Sharp to make a web site that its own device cannot access.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Blocking Netscape 6; hyp-Opera-sy by Daimaou · · Score: 1

      I am using Opera and am able to access their site just fine.

    2. Re:Blocking Netscape 6; hyp-Opera-sy by hkmwbz · · Score: 1
      "How hypocritical of Sharp to make a web site that its own device cannot access."

      It can't?

      Anyway, how is this hypocrisy? It is only hypocrisy if they criticize others of something they are doing themselves.

      But are they actually doing that?

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
  26. I got there with Opera... by r2ravens · · Score: 2

    ... reporting itself as MSIE 5.0.

    (Rant on) What if I don't want to "fully experience the Sharp USA site"? What if I just want some damn information? And I can read... imagine that, you don't have to put up all kinds of pretty little pictures so I know what you're trying to say. Yeah, yeah, I know, use lynx. Actually I often do. (Ok, rant off)

    The product looks pretty slick. I'd want some hands-on time (would that be "thumbs-on time"?) before I gave up TRGPro. My next PDA with probably be the Handera anyway. I don't need color or to be able to play MP3s. It's a PDA, not a laptop.

    That being said, I do like the option of the thumboard for input, but I can live without it.

    --
    War is Peace. Freedom is Slavery. Ignorance is Strength. - George Orwell or George Bush?
    1. Re:I got there with Opera... by Ravagin · · Score: 2

      Aye. Best part is, NS4 reads the site just fine.

      What if I just want some damn information?
      Which is why they should just _switch off_ whatever styles or code make it not work on non-ie when a non-ie loads it. That leaves the material readable but not fancy. It's just courtesy.

      --

      Karma: T-rexcellent.

    2. Re:I got there with Opera... by FFFish · · Score: 1

      Or, instead of Lynx, browse using Opera with graphics/javascript/etc turned off. If your PDA Opera is like the Windows one, the "G" key toggles graphics instantly.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    3. Re:I got there with Opera... by RevAaron · · Score: 2

      I don't need color or to be able to play MP3s. It's a PDA, not a laptop.

      Heh. The reason I don't bother with Palm OS devices is that I want more than an electornic organizer and toy. To each her own, I suppose. :) (Color is an annoying waste of battery, though. )

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
  27. Re:Is this true? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

    yep - 101 (no, not binary) years old. life didn't owe her anything else. see how long you can go when you live in the very acme of luxury?

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
  28. Powerful, Flexible, Mobile. by let+the+storm · · Score: 1

    (Moderators: read both links in write-up completely before attempting to mod this post.)
    Blow-by-blow:

    The Sharp Zaurus SL-5500 combines state-of-the-art Sharp technology and Sharp innovation,
    mmmmm, pointy...

    ...to deliver a unique and compelling PDA solution
    a) it's the only one like it, b) you need it...

    The Sharp Zaurus SL-5500 offers everything from mobile communications to mobile multimedia;
    All in a convenient portable form.

    keyboard integration and dual expansion [slots] deliver one of the most versatile and flexible PDA solutions on the market today.
    Ooooh, versatile and flexible. Next to that and the mobile multimedia and the mobile communications that make it a unique and compelling PDA solution, my only question is,

    What's it do?

    (beyond the palm stuff, obviously)
    --
    m iso socially aware artistic geek pen-pal, m or f, in '1337 edu. jazz, poetry a must.
    email me (click my user info for addy) if you're interested.

  29. Upgrade your browser by Pellelelle · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Unfortunately Sharp won't give me information on their new Linux product since I'm using Mozilla...

  30. Browsers being turned away: by Aanallein · · Score: 1

    As 'a few' people have already noted before now, non IE and NS 4.x browsers are being turned away. A "tech evangelism" bug for Mozilla has just been filed. (bug 134431 - ooh, palindrime bug).
    Guess the evangelism guys will soon tear into Sharp and get them to fix this. :)

  31. Stop whining about the browser by Ho+Kooshy+Fly · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Look man, evaluate the product not their web site. You can still go get specifications for the Zaurus just run Netscape and be a little forgiving. And don't be such arses when it comes to their choice of Opera. Opera is lightweight and has already been used in many embedded products and has itself been proven. No doubt it was a ignorant thing but the product has some good qualities. I picked up mine and have the 802.11b CF card and it is amazing. Don't knock till you try it and talk about merits and faults of the product not advetisments. Ho

    1. Re:Stop whining about the browser by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      What if we do not have Netscape 4.7x installed or any version of Netscape? On my current computer the only browser I have is Mozilla. For everything so far, it has worked fine. Of course I do find it interesting that other sharp websites work fine with Mozilla.

      In fact here is the Zaurus Website.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    2. Re:Stop whining about the browser by SCHecklerX · · Score: 2
      Look, man, I don't have Netscape 4.x installed here, let alone any Micro$loth products. They lost a potential sale because I can't even look at their product. Idiots.

      What really kills them is the fact that they are selling a linux-based product, yet turning away probably the most popular browser on linux today (that would be mozilla).

  32. yeah well... by ainsoph · · Score: 2

    It might have an Opera web browser, but I have the latest Mozilla and Galeon and it tells me to upgrade.

    YAY sharp!

  33. Taco never ran linux in his life by HanzoSan · · Score: 2

    I have XP and Linux, that has nothing to do with using IE, people who use IE usually dont have alot of experience with open source, linux, or anything of the sort.

    I'm betting taco is an IE using Windows only kinda guy.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:Taco never ran linux in his life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm betting you pirated XP.

    2. Re:Taco never ran linux in his life by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 2

      I use XP but I chose mozilla over IE because I can't do without tabbed browsing.

      graspee

  34. Bitch and Whine.... by NetJunkie · · Score: 2

    I'm sure this device wasn't designed yesterday and frankly Mozilla wasn't ready for production until recently. On the other hand Opera has been going strong for a long time and has a proven track record. Sure, Mozilla may have been just great on your box, but that doesn't mean it would have done well on a handheld.

  35. No browser probs here by gregfortune · · Score: 2

    Dunno what all the crap about browser problems is, but I'm getting in, and have been getting in, just fine with Konqueror 2.2.1.

    User Agent String: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/2.2.1; Linux; en_US, en)

    So, what's up? Does Mozilla send something radically different?

  36. Wish it were here... by tumutbound · · Score: 1

    Still not available in Oz! amazon shows shipping to US addresses only :-(

    1. Re:Wish it were here... by jmorse · · Score: 2

      Watch for these on eBay. I'll be posting my extra one in a day or two.

      --

      "You done taken a wrong turn."
      -Bill McKinney, in Deliverance
  37. Likely Mozilla simply isn't lightweight enough by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 3, Informative

    Opera has the embedded market outside winceworld almost entirely to themselves. The browser is turning up in all sorts of phones and other devices.

    This isn't because they've got some sort of monopoly, it's because they produce a well engineered, well targetted product.

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  38. Their lame Javascript. by thesolo · · Score: 5, Informative

    here is the little piece of code on Sharp's that is preventing Moz from entering. Why they would even do this is beyond me.

    //BROWSER DETECTION for 3
    var threeNum = navigator.appVersion.substring(0,1)
    if (parseInt(threeNum) location.pathname = "/browser.html";
    }


    If you really want to see the Sharp site, turn off Javascript in Moz for Navigator, and you're in.

  39. Notice "Download Internet Explorer" by HanzoSan · · Score: 2

    They are trying to switch Netscape users to Internet Explorer and i bet Microsoft paid them to do it.

    You dont see a Link to download Netscape.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
  40. Mozilla workaround by BlueFall · · Score: 1

    If you turn off Javascript in Mozilla, it looks like you can load the page...

  41. Hardware specs.... by R3 · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...seem to be very similar to those of the standard PocketPC PDAs:

    -3.5'' Reflective TFT LCD Screen 65,536-colors
    -Front light
    -240 x 320 pixel high-resolution color screen
    -Built in SD and Compact Flash(TM) Card Expansion Slots
    -206 Mhz Inte®l StrongARM® Processor
    -64MB of memory
    -Rechargeable Replaceable Li-ION Battery
    -MPEG-1/MP3 Player
    -12 Navigation Keys, Programmable Quick Buttons

    Looks almost the same as iPaq 38xx series, plus some interesting extras (replaceable battery, both CF and SD slots).

    It will be interesting to see how well it will fare on the market, considering it is a bit cheaper than iPaqs and Jornadas, but still more expensive than Palms....

  42. Here's a sample letter by yerricde · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I just guessed the address webmaster@ because it's common for administrators of web sites to use this address. Even if it isn't, a competent postmaster will see the flood of bounces from webmaster@ and set up the appropriate forwarding.

    Here's the letter I sent:

    To: webmaster@sharpelectronics.com
    Subject: Blocking web browsers is counterproductive

    By blocking Netscape 6, you're throwing away
    potential sales.

    Many of the people who would buy your Sharp Zaurus
    PDA are the same people who use more recent
    browsers such as Netscape 6.2. If you track
    Referer:, look in your server logs for hits coming
    from a site called slashdot.org. Many of
    lashdot's readers use Mozilla, an open-source web
    browser that's essentially identical to Netscape
    6.x. Users of Netscape 6 and Mozilla would prefer
    even a text-only information page to the empty page
    you are providing.

    Heck, you block Opera, the very browser built into
    the PDA. This strikes me as highly hypocritical.

    Please remove the browser blocks.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Here's a sample letter by Radical+Rad · · Score: 2
      That's a pretty good idea!

      But you'd better cc: postmaster@sharpelectronics.com and sales@sharpelectronics.com and support@sharpelectronics.com just to be sure somebody sees it.

      And contrary to what another post said, Netscape 4.x does not work correctly. I have it open right now and the DHTML is not displaying correctly so the asses never even tested it. But at least it didn't send me to the 'convert to ie' page.

    2. Re:Here's a sample letter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New lashdot story by Mistress Taco:

      New leather cat o' nine tails at reasonable price

  43. and once you've bought it... by Capt.+Beyond · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You can grab enhanced versions of some of the apps, http://opie.handhelds.org

    wait till Open Zaurus rom has been released
    http://openzaurus.sourceforge.net

    and or roll your own rom and flash away...
    :D

    --
    -- "Perceptions create reality. By changing your perceptions you change your reality."
  44. slashdot effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    is blocking browsers their way of avoiding the slashdot effect?

  45. Threw away a potential sale. by JaguarsRevenge · · Score: 1

    I *was* actually really considering getting one of these. Not any more!

    1. Re:Threw away a potential sale. by jonnythan · · Score: 1

      You won't buy it because whoever Sharp hired to do their web page doesn't support Mozilla? It seems to work fine on Konq and Netscape 4.x, both of which are available on linux.

      If the decisions of a company's hired web page designer affect whether you buy products from the company, get your head out of your ass.

      When did you last buy a cd, a magazine, pay for cable, or watch a movie?

    2. Re:Threw away a potential sale. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A company's web site is an indicator of how management views customers. Bad sites are a very good reason to avoid companies. It's usually not just the site that's bad, but the entire customer service and support that sucks.

      I'd rather have my head up my ass than bend over for Sharp to fuck my ass, as you seem to prefer.

    3. Re:Threw away a potential sale. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, in order to drive on this road you need to own a BMW.

      What would you say to that - BMWs are available?
      Not everybody wants (nor can afford) a BMW. It's
      bloody road! Why do I need a BMW to drive on it anyway??

      Ultimately, the company makes the decision, not the
      peons who implement it.

  46. Works Fine With Mozilla, too... by blazerw11 · · Score: 1

    It WOULD work perfectly with Mozilla. Sharp is stupidly and ignorantly not allowing Mozilla based browsers.

    This story is supposed to be about their new Linux product, but since they are a boneheaded beauracracy(sp?), we can't talk about the new handheld. We can't even read about it.

    Buy an ipaq and install Linux on it.

    --
    A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices. -- William James
  47. I got mine two days ago by jmorse · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is a great little machine. Embedix 2.4 with both CF and SD/MMC slots (the DRM on the SD is not enabled on the Zaurus). The screen is pretty good (320 x 240) and the apps run very smoothly with 64MB of memory. About 30 people her ein my ofice bought the developer edition at JavaOne, and they're all a bit jealous now. Of course, I did pay a whole lot more than they did.



    I was a bit dissappointed that there's no GUI bash shell on the consumer edition (there was a Qt app shell on the developer edition). I suppose that can be remedied with a software install, but I haven't found the installer yet. It works well with the Linksys WiFi card...but the battery life goes straight down the tube when you're surfing.



    Overall, I'd say it's a very good unit. The Embedix platform has a great chance to overtake PalmOS. I can't wait to see these things evolve over time. I hope they take a cue from Sony and improve the screen res, add nice metal cases, and add a remote control for the audio.

    --

    "You done taken a wrong turn."
    -Bill McKinney, in Deliverance
    1. Re:I got mine two days ago by fitsnips · · Score: 0

      The shell is one the cd that came with it.

      I love mine, also the SMC 2642W cf card does not block either anything up top. Also if you are in the valley computer micro has these and the D-link cf 801.11 cards. Frys only has one card that blocks every thing up top.

      --
      I am a republican not by choice, but rather by lack there of.
    2. Re:I got mine two days ago by Samus · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've had mine for a little over a week now. You can get the bash shell by copying the .ipk files on the install cd. I think the directory is applications. There is a file manager and also some program to run their digital camera CF-plugin. Also tell your friends with the developer version to pick up a couple cf cards or I guess SD would work and search around on http://zauruszone.com's forums for RAM upgrade. It isn't really an upgrade but moves a lot of the stuff in the ROM to a CF card and gives you almost as much RAM as the consumer version.

      --
      In Republican America phones tap you.
    3. Re:I got mine two days ago by davidhedbor · · Score: 1

      Just download the apps from Sharp's My Zaurus site (where they have the terminal and file manager). Even better, download the enhanced OPIE version from their feed (be careful with installing too much OPIE stuff though - might break things).

  48. Web Programing Idiocy 101 by yebb · · Score: 1

    // Lets deliberately make this page inaccessable to all but two browsers.
    if ( (navigator.appName == 'Microsoft Internet Explorer') || (navigator.appName == 'Netscape') ) {
    displayPage();
    }
    else {
    youMustHaveAnOldBrowser();
    }

    morons.

  49. iPAQ fizzles, Zaurus sizzles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can only concur. After seeing my boss's Zaurus, I'm sorry that I popped for an iPAQ. I'm not usually prone to techno envy, but ... The Zaurus will blow your mind! It has just about everything I wanted. Highly recommended. Now if I can only unload my iPAQ on ebay.

    1. Re:iPAQ fizzles, Zaurus sizzles by mocm · · Score: 1

      Have a look at handhelds.org and their link to OPIE.
      Soon you will be able to run the same system on the ipaq. After all they have the same CPU and the linux support for the ipaq hardware is just as good as for the Zaurus (kernel wise and GUI wise).

      --
      ***Quis custodiet ipsos custodes***
    2. Re:iPAQ fizzles, Zaurus sizzles by jmorse · · Score: 2

      Or you can put Embedix on it:
      http://www.handlelds.org.

      --

      "You done taken a wrong turn."
      -Bill McKinney, in Deliverance
    3. Re:iPAQ fizzles, Zaurus sizzles by treke · · Score: 2

      Soon? I'm running it now. There are some items that are Zaurus only, but there are also some OPIE only features. You dont get to run Opera (unless you manage to get your hands on a copy), but Konquerer is available

  50. Complain a little by JaguarsRevenge · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's where to go to to make a "formal" complaint abot Netscape/Mozilla/Opera being blocked.

    http://sharpelectronics.com/global/ContactUsImpr ov eSite/1,1889,,00.html

    1. Re:Complain a little by blindbat · · Score: 1

      Mozilla users can't use that page either!

  51. Re:Doh. === be Sharp by bstadil · · Score: 2, Funny

    Notice the little comment above the Upgrade your Browser blurb it says:

    "Be Sharp"

    Apparently not

    --
    Help fight continental drift.
  52. Okay, use Netscape... by bc90021 · · Score: 4, Informative

    (Yes, I know, they should allow all browsers, but who really thinks here that the Sharp Zaurus team made those web pages? Anyone here ever work in a real company? The web page people are very often *not* the hardware (or even software) development people.)

    Okay, now that we're past that, the Zaurus is a kickass little PDA. (I've had the Developer's Version for months now.) Some things to note:

    * Runs any Linux app that can be (re)compiled for a StrongArm processor. Currently running are:
    Python
    Perl
    SSH
    Telnet
    Konqueror
    Opera
    Seminole Web Server
    Jikes
    BitchX
    NMap
    ...and others, just to name a few.

    * The handwriting recognition isn't that bad. It requires you to train the device for certain characters if you want your own handwriting to work, but that doesn't take much time.

    * IBM MicroDrives work with no problem. I have a 340MB version, and several other Zaurus owners have reported the 1GB version working. (Though they drain the battery quickly.)

    * The keyboard is really easy (and actually kinda fun) to use!

    * The synching for Windows should be up to snuff by now. Someone has already patched the 2.4.x kernels to allow USB networking over Linux in order to connect it to a Linux box, so it is now Linux friendly. :)

    * The "Word Game" that comes with it (like Scrabble) has been very addicting!

    * It is easily 80% of the size of a typical WinCE handheld, and includes two expansion slots (one CF and one SD) by default.

    * It has Java, so you can write Java apps for it.

    * The UI has been greatly improved, and the Zaurus people have taken very seriously feedback from the developers who have had the Developer's model.

    Overall, once you get past the web browser thing, you'll find that with the possible exception of the price (which, incidentally, is similar to other high-end PDAs), it's a kickass little device.

  53. Sharp "we are proprietary" Zaurus by mmusn · · Score: 2, Flamebait
    When I visit their site with Mozilla 0.9.9, I get an error message that they only support IE and Netscape4. And for their handheld, they chose a window system that excludes most open source toolkits from co-existing on the same screen.

    Looks to me Sharp is trying to milk open source for its advertising value, but somehow they just don't get it.

    Thanks, but I'll have a look at the new Sony instead. Commercial developers don't have to pay money to develop for the Sony, and it's a cool piece of hardware anyway.

    1. Re:Sharp "we are proprietary" Zaurus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and sony is so fucking open source ...
      You are so pathetic it is not even funny.
      BTW. Who gives a fuck about you.
      Judging by your post, you are fucking poor idiot who woudn't shell a buck for any kind of software or hardware anyway.

    2. Re:Sharp "we are proprietary" Zaurus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And PalmOS is just overflowing with various open source toolkits, is running latest builds of Mozilla ...

      Man, sometimes people are so stupid it is not even fun trying to expose their idiocy.
      Yep, you belong to that group...

  54. Bugzilla by petard · · Score: 3, Informative

    Bugzilla says:

    "Sorry, links to Bugzilla from Slashdot are disabled."

    --
    .sig: file not found
  55. How to make your browser work by bahamat · · Score: 1

    Ok, I came into this discussion late, but if you're using something other than IE just turn off JavaScript.

    Happy surfing.

  56. How do you use the voice recorder? by phr1 · · Score: 2
    It looks like the unit has no internal speaker.

    Do you have to plug in the mic, record, then unplug the mic and plug in a headphone in order to listen to what you recorded? What a pain, if true. I wonder if you can use a Y adapter to plug in the headphone and mic simultaneously (even if you can't use them full duplex--I don't see how you could).

    I begin to wish they'd left out the slide-out keyboard and put in normal audio hardware (built in mic and speaker plus the jacks). The keyboard is a little faster to enter text with than the on-screen keyboard, but the keys are stiff enough that it's more effort, so I use the on-screen one.

    1. Re:How do you use the voice recorder? by antv · · Score: 1

      There are single-jack headphones. Mine works fine with cell-phone headset+adapter, both from Radioshack.

      --
      Obama 2012: our incompetent asshole is slightly less of an incompetent asshole than the other incompetent asshole !
    2. Re:How do you use the voice recorder? by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 2
      You can use your headphones as a mic and speaker. When recording, talk into the left channel speaker.

      <BLATENT PLUG>
      Or, you can build this speaker/mic hack with a few cheap parts.
      </BLATENT PLUG>

  57. Re:If you're using Opera ...NO NO NO by bstadil · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I hope most folks are like me and refuse to set the Opera browser to anything other than Opera. We will never get rid of this IE only crap if we use workarounds. ITs off topic I know but I am at the max so mod me down. Wish Slashdot had a Meta Mod function, that you could set since often very interesting side discussion emerge that the Newbees proudly mod down as Off topic.

    --
    Help fight continental drift.
  58. My best guess by brokeninside · · Score: 1
    They probably use the same combination 1/8" jack that most cell phones use for headsets.

  59. Not true... by gregfortune · · Score: 2

    Not true. Identifying as Mozilla 5.0 works fine with Konqueror

    1. Re:Not true... by StuffYourReligion · · Score: 1

      Read my post more carefully: I was talking about Opera

      =)

      --
      I have no special gift, I am only passionately curious. --Albert Einstein
    2. Re:Not true... by gregfortune · · Score: 2

      Erm... We're both talking about a user agent value right? So, it's just parsed as text, right? So it really doesn't give a damn if I'm using Konqueror or I'm using Opera if the user agent string is the same, right? So if it picks up Mozilla 5.0 from your user agent string and does not allow you in, it should do the same to me, right? So what are you talking about anyway? It's clearly not Mozilla 5.0 in the string that's triggering the failed entry.

  60. Notice the only link on that site is for IE? by HanzoSan · · Score: 2

    Its called advertising.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
  61. Galeon: How to view Sharp web site using Galeon by rkswamy · · Score: 3, Informative

    I found this in the Galeon FAQ, I set mine to "Netscape/4.0" and it works but only if I turn on Javascript. The ridiculous thing is that Netscape 4.78 which is *allowed* to see the page does not actually render it correctly while it looks perfect in Galeon!

    --------

    How can I change the User Agent string that galeon uses?

    This feature is already implemented. It is not in the UI because there was a mozilla bug that made galeon to crash at startup with some strings.

    You can set the user agent from the command line using GConf:

    1. To get the current user agent:

    gconftool -g /apps/galeon/Advanced/Network/user_agent

    2. To set the user agent to XXX:

    gconftool -s /apps/galeon/Advanced/Network/user_agent --type=string "XXX"

    3. To restore the default user agent:

    gconftool -s /apps/galeon/Advanced/Network/user_agent --type=string default

  62. Re:Defend against the Slashdot Effect! by abhinavnath · · Score: 1

    Worried your precious website will be overrun by hordes of ravenous, pillaging Linux geeks? Just block any weird, uncivilized, nonstandard browser. That'll show them.

    "In the heart and soul of the Universe, there is a reason."

    --
    My other sig is also a .Porsche
  63. My Z (Zaurus) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Z has two expansion ports, a CF port and SD port. It has an IR port
    that can connect to my Nokia cell phone and treat it like a modem.

    Originally Compact Flash was only for memory cards, now there are cameras,
    ethernet, modems, wireless modems, wireless ethernet, 1GB hard drives (5GB
    coming soon).

    The Secure Digital port currently only has memory cards, but all the other
    goodies are coming within the year.

    I got a 128MB SD card and a 802.11b CF card.

  64. I've never heard of a stereo cell phone headset by phr1 · · Score: 2

    and I don't think you can plug a headphone into a cell phone. The plug is the wrong size. Interesting thought though.

  65. Z vs iPAQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Z = $499
    iPAQ = $499, $600, $650

    Z = Linux kernel 2.4.6 plus Qtopia GUI
    iPAQ = Microsoft Pocket PC 2002

    Z = 16 bit color - 65536 colors
    iPAQ = 12 bit color - 4096 colors ($499 model)

    Z = 64MB ram, 206Mhz StrongArm
    iPAQ = 64MB ram, 206Mhz StrongArm

    Z = SD and CF
    iPAQ = SD only
    - Requires expansion pack for CF ($40)
    - Need to use "sleave" with CF cards
    - Other expansion packs are > $100

    Z = Trainable handwriting recognition (Use Palm gestures if you want)
    iPAQ = Not trainable

    Z = Linux based, with SWEET gui (QTopia)
    - Many applications already available
    - Very active user community, mailing lists, wikki
    - bash
    iPAQ = MS Pocket PC
    - You can install Linux, procedure is hard
    - Your purchase still counts as MS sale ups market share

    Z = Very cool and useable built-in keyboard
    iPAQ = 3rd party external keyboard $100

    Z = No built-in speaker, must use headphone and/or mic
    iPAQ = built-in crappy speaker

    Z = Builtin integrated Java
    iPAQ = No Java

    Z = Desktop software for Windows, Mac, Linux
    iPAQ = Desktop software for Windows

    Z = Included browser is Opera, Konqueror available
    iPAQ = Pocket IE

    1. Re:Z vs iPAQ by RevAaron · · Score: 3, Informative

      ...Or you could buy an iPAQ 3150... 206 MHz CPU, 16 MB RAM, 320@240 B&W scren and a CF sleeve including a 128 MB card for $200. Perfect for someone who doesn't want to waste a $500+ on a Zaurus or a higher-end iPAQ.

      And you can still install Linux, and run OpenZaurus on it, if you want to settle for a substandard Linux distro on a PDA.


      Z = Trainable handwriting recognition (Use Palm gestures if you want)
      iPAQ = Not trainable


      Not quite. The Zaurus has trainable HWR, yes. But the iPAQ has many recognizers available, some trainable. Including Transcriber and CalliGrapher, which are real handwriting recognition, not just the crappy *character* recognition that comes with the Zaurus. Until Palm OS or Linux/PDA gets real HWR like the Newton, or CalliGrapher, there's no way I could rationalize spending $500 on what amounts to be just a toy.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    2. Re:Z vs iPAQ by Toxxy · · Score: 2, Informative

      In your scattershot approach to explaining why the iPAQ (one of many Microsoft Pocket PC organizers) is inferior to the Zaurus, you've managed to glaze over many details.

      The baseline iPAQ unit is $399, not $499. More robust models are available for people who want extra. The prices are $499 and $599 for the 3765 and 3835 respectively. If you want to purchase a Zaurus unit, you're stuck at the $499 pricepoint and cannot get any more or less advanced units, no matter what.

      The Zaurus's display has 16-bit color and iPAQ's unit at the same price has 12-bit color. I defy anyone to show me a difference between the screens that I can clearly and distinctly notice.

      You listed the iPAQ as having 64 MBs of memory. You neglected to mention that it also has a 32 MB flash rom.

      When you said the iPAQ has SD memory expansion, you were thinking of a different model than the rest. The iPAQ's $499 model (the unit you chose to use for all the other comparisons) has no expansion built in. The extra sleeves available for it enable you to use CompactFlash cards as well as PCMCIA (laptop) cards. There is also an expansion sleeve available for holding two PCMCIA cards. With the Zaurus, you are locked into CompactFlash and the comparitively useless SD card. Sure, it's a little bit extra, but I'll stick with my PC card expandibility.

      I cannot fathom how you came up with the idea that the iPAQ has weak input options. For input options, you can write in your regular handwriting, full sentences at a time. Through a single tap you can access an absurdly powerful handwriting configurator, which allows you to set up how you write each letter. Just for the letter A alone, it supports three different ways to write it in uppercase as well as five different ways to write it in lowercase. This is available for all letters and numbers and all the types of punctuation you see on your qwerty keyboard. If you're not comfortable with that, you can use graffiti strokes to enter your text (supporting ALL popular Palm strokes), or -- if you're so inclined -- an onscreen qwerty keyboard. Microsoft put a lot of effort into their text input options, and I am amazed that all you could say about it was "Not trainable."

      "SWEET gui"? I'm supposed to be excited about it because it's... "SWEET"? Is it also TUBULAR? The fact that "many applications" are available is true for both units, if not moreso for the Pocket PC, considering it's been around for about 3 years and is currently available on seven devices that I can immediately think of. I see you also mentioned that it comes with Microsoft Pocket PC and that it is difficult to install Linux on it. I would dare say that Pocket PC handhelds are a lot more accepting of Linux than this Linux handheld is of Pocket PC. Now who's strictly controlling what software is run on their hardware?

      Zaurus's built-in keyboard is nothing amazing. I would strain myself to describe it as being "very cool." There is a full-sized keyboard available for the iPAQ for $100. There are others, too. I have not seen any such accessories for the Zaurus. I personally cannot bear to use a keyboard that is anything less than full-sized, and for hardcore data entry and command line usage, I find it ironic that a product running on Linux cannot accomodate me.

      You are also correct in mentioning that the Zaurus does not come with a microphone or speaker, and the iPAQ comes equipped with both. And in what universe is having Opera built in as the main browser a selling point?

      You are comparing apples to oranges. The iPAQ is just one of many Pocket PC solutions available. If you're really looking for some stiff competition, take a look at Audiovox's Maestro, which blows the doors off anything near it its price point. Or maybe even the HP Journada 568.

      We now return to your regularly scheduled group Linux masturbation.

      --

    3. Re:Z vs iPAQ by flux4 · · Score: 1
      Z = Desktop software for Windows, Mac, Linux
      iPAQ = Desktop software for Windows
      According to Sharp's FAQ, desktop software exsists only for various flavours of Windows. Am I missing something?
    4. Re:Z vs iPAQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well put. But I have some questions for you Ipaq owners out there.

      WHEN HP buys Compaq and quits making the Ipaq in favor of the Journada, what will you compare it to?
      Will they keep making parts/accessories for it?

      If PocketPC 2004 comes out, will it work on your old system?

      Lastly, about the color. I agree on those built in screens you wouldn't be able to tell the difference, but if you hook up an external monitor; say to give a presentation, you will notice a HUGE difference. 4096 colors is nice, but the human eye can distinguish over 2 million different colors.

      Steve Michael
      smichael@netcapade.net

    5. Re:Z vs iPAQ by Samus · · Score: 1

      I suppose that Sharp could come out with a sleeve like device for the Z. The sleeve on the iPAQ fits into the spot where the cradle connects IIRC. The Z has something similar. My main complaint about those sleeves is that as soon as you add one it starts making the thing huge. When I first saw the belt pack thing I practically laughed my ass off. It made me picture a bunch of Revenge of the Nerd style people walking around with these big protrusions coming from their hips. I believe its Toshiba that offers a CF and SD built in at a reasonable size. That makes sense. Especially if you've actually seen how big the double PCMCIA sleave makes the thing. A wireless card and CF card make it weigh as much as one of those ultra light laptops and it ends up being roughly the size of a brick. My Z fits in my pants pocket almost as comfortable as my old handspring. There is no way in hell an iPAQ with a sleeve would fit in my pocket. The only way that thing is a PocketPC is if it brings its own MS Pocket.

      --
      In Republican America phones tap you.
    6. Re:Z vs iPAQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "explaining why the iPAQ (one of many Microsoft Pocket PC organizers) is inferior to the Zaurus"

      There was no conclusion drawn, the facts speak for themselves though.

      Pricing info:
      http://www.compaq.com/products/handhelds/po cketpc/ index.html

      The fact is that the Zaurus is 30-50% cheaper than a comparble Pocket PC.

      Flash Rom:
      32MB on the Pocket PC devices. What does this mean? That Windows, in whatever random flavor of month, is still bloated and heavy weight? That isn't something I would brag about.

      Keyboard:
      Get a keyboard for your iPAQ and it raises the cost 20%-30%, plus it is external, yet another thing to carry around in additional to your portable.

      Other devices you mention:
      Maestro = much less hardware than Z, not comparable
      Journada 568 = 20% more expensive, for less hardware than the Z. Bump that to 40% when you add the accesories to make it equal. Basically, like an iPAQ.

      The dump MS weenies are feeling the heat on all fronts.

    7. Re:Z vs iPAQ by cjsnell · · Score: 2


      I'd like to add that the 3rd-party keyboard available for the iPAQ is a PEICE OF HORSE PUCKY. I had that damned thing for about half an hour before returning it. The key response is horrible and the damned thing comes detached from the iPAQ if you bang hard on keys like I do. The lack of a decent keyboard was the entire reason that I sold my iPAQ for about 40% of what I paid for it on eBay. :(

    8. Re:Z vs iPAQ by hkmwbz · · Score: 1
      "And in what universe is having Opera built in as the main browser a selling point?"

      It is a very strong selling point, seeing as the specs for Opera Embedded are exactly the same as the desktop counterpart. Opera 5 Embedded has the exact same core as Opera 5 Desktop. It has the exact same support for HTML, CSS, etc.

      Pocket IE is basically a less functional version of desktop-IE in every respect. It support less and generally does a worse job at everything. Except being small and less functional, of course.

      This is why Opera is not only a strong selling point for the device. Opera also has a strong selling point to other device manufacturers, since they basically get the same thing as the desktop version if they decide to go with Opera.

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
    9. Re:Z vs iPAQ by scm · · Score: 1

      I run Linux and Qtopia on my ipaq...

      http://qpe.sourceforge.net/ipaq.html

      (of course, I did pay for the CE license...)

    10. Re:Z vs iPAQ by Toxxy · · Score: 1

      I appreciate the enthusiasm with which you seem to hold these personal organizers, but I'm curious about a few of your statements.

      How big the operating system is not an issue with the flash rom. Windows ("whatever random flavor of the month"? I can only think of one wide-spread operating system that has daily builds available) can be as large as it wants, and if it has more built-in software and sacrifices storage to it, I wouldn't mind. But I'm getting the best of both worlds here. Not only does it have a wide variety of built-in software, I also am not taking it out of my storage.

      Regarding the keyboard options, for a product running Linux, there's no way I'm going to use that ridiculous built-in keyboard. Again, I find it ironic that a device running command-line Linux does not have a full-sized keyboard available for it. At least with the iPAQ, I have the option to elect to use a full-sized keyboard. With the Zaurus, I'm locked into coding with a toothpick. Maybe you've got skinny fingers?

      I am surprised at your comments on the Maestro. Much less hardware? It has 32 MBs less of memory. I can buy a tiny piece of 32MB MMC memory for $30 full retail. I get the feeling I'm missing something when you say "much less." Even after spending the extra $30, I'm spending less and getting a more powerful system.

      And on the Journada, I'll agree with the fact that it's more expensive, but again, I'm not sure what this "less hardware" you speak of is.

      And whatever a "dump MS weenies" is, the only front we're discussing here is personal organizers, a very small part of Microsoft's (MS weenies = Microsoft weenies?) market. And even taking that into consideration, the Zaurus is scarecly competition, and more of a Linux fanboy toy. imho, of course.

      --

  66. Re:Is this true? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

    current affairs not a hobby of yours then?

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
  67. [OT] A shame that the web don't support Mozilla by CondeZer0 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Hi, here is what I wrote, just in case anybody finds it
    useful, BTW, I thought that the Zaurus was pretty cool,
    and was thinking of maybe buying one, you can be sure that
    now I will think it twice before doing so... I'm really
    pissed of...

    And for some one who said that it was the fault of the web
    designer and not the company itself, a company should take
    care that *his* web site follows the web standards and
    support all platforms and browsers, of course they are
    free to don't do it, but then they will piss off people
    like me that instead of promote their cool products will
    spread as much bad press for them as possible...

    - -

    To: webmaster@sharpelectronics.com
    Subject: Can't access sharpelectronics.com with Mozilla, Netscape 6 or Opera

    Hi

    I was interested in the new Sharp Zaurus SL-5500,
    but my access was denied to sharpelectronics.com
    using any of the following browsers available for
    my platform(FreeBSD): Mozilla, Netscape 6 and Opera.

    Internet Explorer and Netscape 4.x don't exist for my
    platform, so I'm completely unable to access the your
    site.

    Please, fix your site so it's accessible by any
    browser that follows the web standards(http://w3.org)

    Thanks

    \\Uriel

    - -

    And don't forget to report this kind of problems at
    http:\\bugzilla.mozilla.org as "Evangelism" bugs,
    visit http://mozilla-evangelism.bclary.com/ for more
    info...

    And here is the bug for "http://www.sharp-usa.com/"
    (that seems like it's the same as sharpelectronics.com):
    http://bugzilla.mozilla.or g/show_bug.cgi?id=63915

    Best wishes

    \\Uriel

    P.S.: And I know that seems that Konkeror is supported, and
    that I can change the user agent, but I shouldn't need to do
    that! If a web site follows the w3c standards it should work
    on all browsers that also follows the standards, and
    there is no excuse to not follow the standard, period

    --
    "When in doubt, use brute force." Ken Thompson
    1. Re:[OT] A shame that the web don't support Mozilla by Profane+Motherfucker · · Score: 0

      Oh for fucks sake. When will we move beyond such trivial fucking issues? I guaranfuckingte that half the people doing the most bitching aren't even interested in the fucking PDA because it's an overprice piece of shit.

      This whole cocksucking thread is nearly fucked innundated with a whole bunch of whiny posts pissing and moaning about how the fucking page of an over fucking priced handheld can't be rendered in a fucking alternate browser.

      And this fucking post is the most highest rated motherfucker in the thread. It has nothing to do with the goddamn fucking pda. The article should have read:

      Sharp's webpage not viewable in Mozilla
      from the lets-send-a-fuckload-of-form-letters dept
      BTW, they are also selling a PDA. I just happened to reboot to play the Sims, and used IE. I wasn't using linux at this time.

      Where's the obligatory psychotic motherfucker using lynx? What about that poor motherfucker? He can't look at at least 95% of the shit out there. BRING BACK GOPHER! We won't have this motherfucking issue anymore. I'm going fucking nuts here with all this Slashdot bullshit crashing around. You'd think that this was some sort of fucking genocide or a declaration of fatwa on Linux. Do I have to be so fucking pedantic as to point out that most bitches use IE? Look, no fucking slam here. This motherfucking is shooting straight (from the hip) but for jesus fuck's sake, it is a pretty fucking popular browser that has a ton of fucking tit ass enhancements.

    2. Re:[OT] A shame that the web don't support Mozilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This is an excellent reason to use Galeon. If you skimmed through the slashdot comments to find that javascript is what is tripping Sharp's website and causing the error, then you could have quickly turned it off under the settings menu and clicked the back button to read about the product. Meanwhile in a different tab you might be commenting on the slashdot window or learning how to get your mousewheel working by editting /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 so the InputDevice section looks something like:
      Section "InputDevice"
      Identifier "Mouse0"
      Driver "mouse"
      Option "Device" "/dev/mouse"
      Option "Protocol" "IMPS/2" # This works with my logitech and ms mousewheel mice.
      Option "Emulate3Buttons" "off"
      Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5" # I think this is also important
      EndSection
    3. Re:[OT] A shame that the web don't support Mozilla by alexander+m · · Score: 1
      > Where's the obligatory psychotic motherfucker using lynx?
      (*cough*) that would be me.

      i only run it in a corner of the screen at work for a couple of news sites like the register... nobody believes that a command prompt counts as the web so i'm left in peace. surprising how many sites it works with actually! :P
  68. Where to find Zaurus software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Check out www.myzaurus.com and www.thekompany.com/embedded for the most available stuff.

  69. what the crap? by Gavitron_zero · · Score: 0, Troll
    I can't believe this thing doesn't have a firewire interface...

    Let's fill it up via USB and have it take 10 million hours because USB is bum... stupid.

  70. Oh, they know it allright... by Svartalf · · Score: 2

    Numerous people, some from Mozilla.org, have been sending them e-mails and feedbacks from their website telling them about the problem. They've been told this off and on for something like two months now.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  71. Price? by The+Pi-Guy · · Score: 1

    And... this little sucker retails for......??

    I know the dev edition is $200 which seems like an awesome price for a color PDA, but whatzit gonna cost me at Best Buy?

    --j

    1. Re:Price? by wholesomegrits · · Score: 1

      $500 assraping dollars. The fucker is spendy.

      --
      No sig is worth reading.
  72. Interesting machine by stevarooski · · Score: 3, Informative
    A friend of mine got the developer version of this PDA and was showing it around. My impressions based on this brief preview were as follows:

    The good:
    • Excellent screen. Sharp and great response.
    • Good suite of apps. I didn't get to test the MPEG and MP3 players, but I liked what I saw otherwise.
    • Good 'heft'. . .the unit felt solid in my hand, and appeared well made.
    • Its ZIPPY! The OS has been well tuned for this device, and there's more than enough power under the hood.
    The bad:
    • I really, REALLY don't like the slide-out keyboard!! I can understand why it's included, but the buttons are tiny and it seems useless for anything except painstaking data entry where accuracy is absolutely essential. If I was going to type on a pda, I'd get a portable fold-out keyboard like they have for the palms.
    • As was mentioned previously, the stylus IS a bit small for those with larger hands. Reminds me of using a pencil thats been sharpened too much.
    Overall, the appeal of this device for me is the OS, not the hardware. Its a nice unit and should really help the 'linux is ready for mainstream use' cause, but the ability to ssh into a server from my pda sounds great. I don't know if I will buy one, but were I shopping for a PDA I would consider this unit carefully.
    --

    - - - - - - - -
    Don't worry, being eaten by a crocodile is just like going to sleep in a giant blender.
    1. Re:Interesting machine by GeorgieBoy · · Score: 2

      "I really, REALLY don't like the slide-out keyboard!! I can understand why it's included, but the buttons are tiny and it seems useless for anything except painstaking data entry where accuracy is absolutely essential. If I was going to type on a pda, I'd get a portable fold-out keyboard like they have for the palms."

      I have to say this is the one feature I like with this device (I've been developing for them since last fall). I can "type" much much faster than I can write graffiti or other recognition types, and I can do graffiti quite quickly on a palm device. I have big thumbs and I can still type on the Zaurus with them, with very high accuracy.

    2. Re:Interesting machine by Psion · · Score: 2

      Oh, I have to disagree about the keyboard. I've had my new SL-5500 since Thursday night, and although I worried at first about the tiny buttons, I soon realized that they work better than I feared. I've gotten up to around 15 wpm on it and I'm close to being able to touch type lower-case letters already. Uppercase and numbers will take longer, of course.

  73. Keyboard by zzzmarcus · · Score: 1

    I've used a Psion Revo (Diamond Mako) for a couple years now, and I'm still wondering why (especially now that Psion has left the handheld market) no one has made something similar to their keyboard. I can touch type on the Revo at faster than 50wpm, I can't imagine being able to do that on the Sharp Zarus. Until something as good as (or better) than the Revo keyboard comes along, I'm sticking with it.

    It uses Opera as it's browser also, and can run Java applets along with a host of other features still uncommon on most Palm/Pocket PC handhelds.

    1. Re:Keyboard by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      I think that Psion's wonderful slide-out design is patented - it'd only make sense. Have you ever seen the keyboard on the Series 7 / Netbook? Brilliant.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
  74. Javascript Browser Check. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    So, yet another idiot art student, calling himself a "graphic designer", likely using a drag-n-drop webpage assembly tool, decides that it's in Sharp's best interest to use DHTML, etc., to promote their product. And that customers using browsers that do not support DHTML are worth "throwing away" for all the cool features that using DHTML on the website gives him. Oh, and assume that it is also somehow better to turn users completely away rather than not show them some extra rollovers and dhtml that may not work in their browser. Multiply the price of this unit times the number of pageviews they just lost from the tech-loving, mozilla-using slashdot crowd (one of their primary target audiences), and give that figure to his boss. I wonder what would happen?

    Ok, let's assume that that money does not matter. Let's assume that the retarded notion that blocking non-conformant users is indeed the right thing to do.

    So how does this idiot implement this solution? By running an incomplete Javascript check against the browser version number.

    So, he has successfully excluded people using browsers that:
    • do not support DHTML AND
      do support javascript AND
      do not have javascript turned off AND
      match the incomplete list of working browsers.

    But he has NOT excluded people using:
    • ANY browsers with broken DHTML that have javascript turned off
    • ANY browsers with broken DHTML that do not support javascript either
    • AND browsers with working DHTML but do not exist in his feeble, incomplete list of supported browsers


    If it were really the case that nonconformant users should be turned away, he hasn't even succeeded in blocking the right people.

    He's only blocking a good portion of the people who are interested in the product.

    Makes me feel good to be "just a coder" who can't do UI to save his life when I'm around pompus, pretentious "web designers" who think they know how the Web works. That these pretentious no-talent jerks get paid anything more than $15k per year to call themselves "web designers" astounds me.
  75. Better Link - works with Mozilla by rawg · · Score: 1

    Here is a better link that works with Mozilla.

    www.sharpplace.com

    --
    The above is not worth reading.
  76. Dev Unit New Price by gppstef · · Score: 1

    It seems the dev unit, the one with 32mb RAM instead of 64mb is now $399 instead of $199. Not quite the price break as before, but still a bit cheaper. If I am in error, please correct me, as I wouldn't mind one of the $199 units =)

  77. Now you've got me thinking... by redhatbox · · Score: 2, Interesting


    Darn it all, now I'm gonna have to go buck wild with /. story linking :). A few searches on stuff I remembered from recent history yield:

    More Ergonomic Keyboards - Basically bemoaning the woes of uncomfortable keyboarding among us geeks, which leads us on to:

    Thumbs Are the New Fingers for GameBoy Youth - Your point, illustrated as well as can be :). I suppose those fortunate enough to members of the video game generation will reap their rewards. Still, improvements might be on the way:

    Virtual Keyboard a Reality - This would be my pick for an acceptable solution/workaround. Supporting such devices shouldn't be too difficult, seeing as how the Sharp device is running a Linux variant anyhow.

    Just a few thoughts, mixed with gratuitous linkage...

  78. When available for Europe? by Kemuri · · Score: 1

    Anyone heard about availability in Europe?
    I need this badly.

    Btw, all Sharp pages are "crap" and sending email is a pain.. But nevermind this reaction, it's the fallout of me bing very upset.. you know..

    Kemuri

    1. Re:When available for Europe? by chyn · · Score: 1

      Depends on where you are--they are available in Germany.

      There was one on display at the Saturn Store in
      Duesseldorf. IIRC, the price was around 699 Euro. Too bad it was password locked.

      Guess that 16% VAT really does make a difference.

  79. Sharp Global Website by webgiant · · Score: 1

    Sharp's global website is listed as
    http://sharp-world.com/index.html. Ironically, no email addresses listed for contacting them, but their Global website does list an 800#:

    NORTH AMERICA - U.S.A. - SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION

    For the location of your nearest Sharp Authorized Service Station or for information about Sharp product,call toll-free 1-800-237-4277 / 1-800-BE SHARP (within U.S.A.)
    There is of course another sentence extolling the virtues of the aforementioned "Linux users need not come here" Sharp-USA website.

  80. Probably been said already but.... by Daimaou · · Score: 1

    ...just in case, you CAN access Sharp's site with the Opera browser. The Opera browser is detected as an IE 5 browser and therefore does NOT cause any problems.

    I wish people would actually try accessing the site with Opera before going off about how dumb Sharp is to bundle the Opera browser with their Zaurus PDA and then not support it on their web site, since they do.

    1. Re:Probably been said already but.... by alexander+m · · Score: 1

      only if you "pretend" to be IE, and what opera user wants to do that?

      the problem is that their browser facism script uses the giveaway amateur method of detection (user agent string parsing) rather than the more effective and future-proofed DOM property checking. it's poor web design, nothing more. their dhtml is riddled with it...

      having just developed a stack of modular cross-browser cross-platform javascript/dhtml libraries for a web application at work, i can say that all it requires to be standards compliant, and kind to your users, is a little thought and consideration up-front... pays dividends in the long run.

      patronising your viewers with "upgrade to netscape 4" messages isn't really the way to go.

  81. How fragile is the display? by Kaiwen · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Per the website this thing uses a color reflective TFT display, apparently similar to the iPAQ, which scares me a bit. I've gone through two iPAQs. The first display broke when I dropped it. Despite being much more careful with the second, I took it out of my jacket pocket one day and found the display cracked anyway -- despite its being kept at all times in a custom case with protective cover.

    If the 5500 uses the same screen, I don't think I'm interested.

  82. 802.11b ? VoIP ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it compatible with any 802.11b Wi-fi CompactFlash
    cards ?

    Can one run any VoIP application on it ?
    linphone ? GNOME meeting? rat ? ohphone ?
    speakfreely ?

    Kubus

  83. Working link by vanguard · · Score: 2
    --
    That which does not kill me only makes me whinier
  84. "Blows the IPaq Away"? by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 2

    Blows the IPaq away, huh? Other than the two-slots, Linux OS and mini-keyboard this seems to be exactly the same as the IPaq. And, yes, you can load REAL linux with REAL X-Windows on the IPaq.

  85. Porting BSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's get together and port BSD to it!

  86. PDA's of the future... by nemiak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My dream PDA :-

    .. runs Linux and supports Java

    .. will interface with my desktop & notebook PCs via wireless ethernet

    .. has trainable handwriting recognition and voice control with voice->text capabilities

    .. will open my garage door, (dis/en)able my home security system & replace my tv & stereo remote controls

    .. contains an integrated multiband cell phone

    .. has an integrated GPS

    nearly there!

    1. Re:PDA's of the future... by josepha48 · · Score: 2
      and is completely secure and would note get hacked ;-)

      On another note, I cound't see this site, it said I had to upgrade my browser. To nextscape 4. Funny I'm running mozila 9.9, what the f***!

      --

      Only 'flamers' flame!

  87. I really really want one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can anyone give me $499 to purchase one?

  88. Re:Notice "Download Internet Explorer" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RUN!! RUN!!! The black helicopters are coming!! The black helicopters are coming to make the sky fall!!!

  89. This thing is AWESOME!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I immediately threw away my iPaq! This product rocks seriously! You have to give it a try to understand it!

  90. Xscale CPU? by Deslock · · Score: 1

    Looks cool, but with 400 MHz X-Scale PDAs coming out within months, I'm not too excited about a device based on the 206 MHz StrongARM CPU.

    Any word on when/if Sharp is going to release a version with an X-Scale CPU?

  91. Zaurus battery life? by CommanderRamius · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just wondering how long the Zaurus last. My Palm can go for weeks constantly used but my Yopy needs a recharge every 4 hours of heavy use (play Mp3, mpeg, use calender, etc) How long is the Zaurus' battery life? Or the IPAQ for that matter? Is it worth it to have a color PDA only to recharge every 6 hours or so?

    --
    Captain of the USS Red October Starfleet Command
    1. Re:Zaurus battery life? by Psion · · Score: 2

      For all of it's virtues (I've had mine since Thursday night and loving every moment), this sucker drinks batteries faster than juice boxes in the desert. Rule #1: reduce settings on sound and light. Rule #2: get extra batteries and chargers. Under heavy use, my SL-5500 seems to last about six or seven hours before it needs a recharge. Note that I have not yet placed a wireless network card in it yet, which I expect to reduce time between recharges by another hour.

      Fortunately, the battery packs are small -- about the size of a fat CF card. I plan on getting two or three extras and keeping them around for emergency use. The unit also can be recharged with IPAQ power accessories, so I have a selection to choose from.

  92. Netscape 6.1 Netscape 4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The site also rejects Netscape 6.1

  93. Web Server Stops Serving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They also can't keep their web server running longer than a week. Oooh, it's crippled by Microsoft's officially irresponsible software.

  94. phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm one of the few computer geeks who doesn't own a pda. Add a phone to this and I'm sold. No need to wear a Batman-like utility belt, everthing in one device. I think there are some devices like that which are emerging, but if it doesn't run Linux, it's CRAP.

  95. stupid motherfcukers by vlad_rodionov · · Score: 1

    Blocking mozilla .99?? I somehow doubt it works with N4 but wont with the lates mozilla. Hell I'm not gonna buy windows or install kde bloat just to "fully expreince" their site.

    --

    USA-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
  96. This is what I told them--- by MasterBlaster · · Score: 1

    I told them why it sucks:

    "I wanted to look at your page to see where I could buy a Zaurus, then I found out you don't do business with "my type."

    It seems rather silly to ban someone from looking at your site just because they don't use MSIE. If I disable javascript so you don't know that I am using the "wrong" browser, Netscape seems perfectly able to display your page.

    I may consider coming back or buying Sharp products in the future when you fix your web site but I am concerned this serious lack of judgement in the design of your web site may reflect on the design of your other products. This certainly concerns me enough to avoid any impulse purchases of your products in the future."

    If they get enough notes like this maybe they will do something about it. You can whine all you want to but when you let a business know you came ready to spend money and had a door slammed in your face, they do notice.
    And think, I almost bought one of these things without knowing anything about it. I meant what I said in my note to them. Any future purchases of Sharp products for myself or my company will receive very serious scrutiny.

  97. Here's what happened by MasterBlaster · · Score: 1

    Sharp found out they were being targeted by the same /. hackers that brought down the entire internet in Nigeria just last week.
    For their own protection they decided to allow access only to Microsoft browsers to eliminate the "bad element" that openly opposes Bill's legitimate right to control the world and stupidly refuses to use MS products.
    So far it has worked. A few have discovered they can circumvent Sharp's security by turning off javascript but then got bored and returned to /. to tell stories of their adventures.

  98. To test drive a zaurus online go to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ssh -l guest zuarus.itslinux.org -p 7000
    Password is linux111

  99. Another letter. by Lethyos · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I think it's important that we all write and hammer this company and make them accept the very open standards and technologies they're selling!

    To: webmaster@sharpelectronics.com
    Subject: Your Website Baffles Me

    Dear Webmaster,

    I am highly surprised that you are offering a Linux-based PDA on a web site that blocks open source browsers and even recommends (or requires?) a Microsoft product. I am trying to view http://www.sharpelectronics.com/ using Galeon (which uses the Mozilla engine, and is Mozilla for all intents and purposes, but with only a lighter interface) to read about this great product. It is highly ironic that you could not view this web page with the very product the page is meant to promote.

    I have been very excited and enthusiastic about the Sharp Zaurus and have been looking forward a purchase. Now I'm afraid I cannot hold much faith in a company that puts no stock in technologies (open source software) that act as a crucial component to their product. I will be happy to reconsider if the web site is designed and implemented bias-free, with open standards in mind (such as those used by the Zaurus itself).

    Thank you for your time.

    Who knows? Maybe we'll get a special offer for our toils to keep us as customers. :)
    --
    Why bother.
  100. Test out the Zaurus online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ssh -l guest ober.itslinux.org -p 7000
    Password is linux111
    Ober

  101. Disable Javascript by YoDave · · Score: 1

    You can get in with Mozilla by disabling javascript.

  102. Re:Z vs iPAQ: No Speakder???? On a PDA??? by PhotoGuy · · Score: 2

    PDA Stands for Personal Digital Assistant. One of the key things such an assistant needs to be able to do is remind you about appointments and other things. And the Zaurus doesn't have a speaker???

    From the user manual: "Volume setting allows you to adjust the volume of the stereo headphones to listen to the Media Player and Voice Recorder files, or the alarm, keyclicks, and screentaps." So no tactile feedback, no reminders, no nothing, without headphones. Man, they blew it on this one feature. I'd probably buy one, otherwise. The poor mute little beast.

    If this is true, it has to be one of the first units that ever billed itself a PDA, that did not have a speaker on it. I'm not about to wear my earphones all the time to be reminded of things.

    Can someone at least tell me that this thing can go "beep beep beep"? If not, doesn't anyone else see this as a showstopper, despite all of it's other coolness?

    (Heh, heh, heh, I smell a Microsoft conspiracy; hey, Sharp, we won't cancel your PocketPC licenses for your other products, as long as you severly cripple your Linux Zaurus in a non-obvious way :-)

    -me

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  103. WHO IS BIGGER IDIOT SHARP OR /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DUH YOU NEED IE TO BROWSE TO THIS WEB PAGE

    DUHH!!!!!

    HERE IS A LINK TO MICROSOFT IE

    DUHHH!!!!!

    just because of this i will never buy any sharp products for the rest of my life

    and yes, slashdot reporters are nothing but a bunch of idiotic windoze lamerz who play with their windoze games and IE browserz all day long.

  104. Re:Z vs iPAQ: No Speakder???? On a PDA??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    It does have a built-in buzzer/beeper.

  105. A good enough reason not to get it. by MortisUmbra · · Score: 1

    "It even has Opera as the web browser."

    --

    "The saddest words of mice and men, are not those which were, but should have been."
  106. Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sharp used open source software because it's there, and it's technical capablities. If they wanted advertising, they would have gone for Palm or Pocket PC. They get no additional sales from the *masses* if they advertised open source.

  107. Perhaps... by Svartalf · · Score: 2

    Considering that Sharp's let the info out sufficient to roll your own distribution (not reccomended for the novice) and that there is people already about working on doing the same- it could be considered superior to the iPaq because you can have all the slots, the keyboard and all that the current iPaq distributions bring to the table. The ONE thing that the Zaurus brings to the table that buying an iPaq doesn't offer is that you don't end up paying for a WinCE license (and thereby making it a little cheaper...)

    Since it IS cheaper, has a keyboard built in (no need to buy an external one) with no need for a papoose type dock for slots, etc. I'd say that if it had the same performance and could be done up the same way as the iPaq as far as Linux distributions go, well, the Zaurus wins by leaps and bounds.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  108. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  109. not mozilla compliant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i would like to say that the site won't load with mozilla 0.99 so much for supporting open source, and no im not going to download IE to see this thing

  110. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  111. Incompetent web designers by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

    Given that accessability is the higest value for most sites (I mean, come on, no one is going to go back daily to Sharp's website because the design look kicks butt), why are so many high-priced developers completely incapable of making webpages that work for everyone?

  112. Complaining sometimes works by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

    I've complained to Dell and Compaq about unnecessary use of Javascript and both were fixed -- Dell actually took things really seriously and even had a user experience person email me with questions. I was deeply impressed.

    OTOH, Logitech's web team sucks. I love Logitech mice (the alternative is MS), and since they churn out new models at some ungodly rate, I like to check their website periodically for tech info and a photo of each model. The problem is that the whole stupid site uses Javascript. I emailed their web team twice, and the only thing they did was added text saying "This site may not work properly without Javascript enabled".

    If my next mouse isn't a Logitech one, it will be entirely because of the web team and how annoying it is to get simple information on their product line rather than because of product quality -- I've always been quite pleased with Logitech.

  113. Installing Linux on Ipaq 3150 by phr1 · · Score: 2
    Are there detailed instructions anywhere on how to do this? Last I checked, the standard Familiar distribution didn't work on the 3150 and you need to build a custom kernel. I have a 3150 that I bought with the intention of installing Linux but never got around to it because it was such a pain in the neck. I just got a Zaurus SL5000D (the developer version of the 5500D) for $199 at Java One so the Ipaq is less interesting now, but it would still be good to get rid of that damn WinCE.

    Thanks.

    1. Re:Installing Linux on Ipaq 3150 by RevAaron · · Score: 2

      See this.

      If you want to get rid of that 3150 for cheap, shoot me an email... I could always use a backup for developing my own WinCE/Linux replacement.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
  114. Yes, it makes sounds by phr1 · · Score: 2
    It has a fairly loud buzzer/beeper for alarms and stuff. I agree that a speaker would have been better, and I'd have also liked a built-in mic, but for the purposes you mention the beeper works ok.

    I don't think a Palm Pilot has a speaker (as opposed to a beeper) either, FWIW.

    1. Re:Yes, it makes sounds by PhotoGuy · · Score: 2

      Another essential purpose that PDA's have come to serve for me is for quick voice memos (which I eventually transcribe when I'm not driving, or otherwise unable to write). Again, without a built-in mic, it's still problematic. I might pick one up anyway for the coolness factor, but I'll probably wait until someone hits it with a cool Linux PDA with the right hardware features (at least on par with the CE units).

      -me

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  115. errors in your post by phr1 · · Score: 2
    If you want to purchase a Zaurus unit, you're stuck at the $499 pricepoint and cannot get any more or less advanced units, no matter what.

    Actually there's the developer version with 32MB instead of 64MB of ram. I just got one for $199 at the Java One conference where they were selling them. I think they're more over the web, but still less than $499.

    You listed the iPAQ as having 64 MBs of memory. You neglected to mention that it also has a 32 MB flash rom.

    The Zaurus also has flash rom, I'm not sure how much but probably a comparable amount.

    With the Zaurus, you are locked into CompactFlash and the comparitively useless SD card. Sure, it's a little bit extra, but I'll stick with my PC card expandibility.The SD card isn't useless. It lets you put expansion flash (128 MB SD cards are available) in the SD slot and have the CF slot free for a modem or network card, without needing any bulky sleeves. The iPaq sleeve system is kind of cool but if you use the full sized PCMCIA version (especially the two slot one) and the external keyboard, you're heading toward the bulk of a small laptop. I just don't see much point to that.

    You are also correct in mentioning that the Zaurus does not come with a microphone or speaker, and the iPAQ comes equipped with both.

    I think it's unfortunate that the Zaurus has no mic or speaker, however it has a mic input port which the iPaq lacks. The iPaq's internal mic is not very good and it's a real deficiency that you can't use an external mic with the iPaq. The Zaurus lets you use an external mic including a cellular phone headset mic. If you want to do speech processing applications (that's why I bought the Z and the iPaq) then a headset mic is a better input method than having to hold the PDA up to your face to talk into it. So I'd have to say the Z's approach is (for my purposes) preferable to the iPaq's. Of course I'd prefer to have a built-in mic and speaker and external jacks, but if I have to choose one or the other, there's a fairly good argument for external-only.

  116. Thoughts on the developer version by number6 · · Score: 1

    I've been using the developer version for the last month or so, and it is quite a nice PDA. It plays MP3s and MPEGs (though MPEG playback is a bit slow - I'd say about half the fps of the iPAQ WinCE player). The voice recorder works through the headphones - one headphone (the left I think) becomes the microphone. Don't ask me how this works...

    Screen is good. Keyboard isn't brilliant, but under some circumstances is a lot better than using the stylus. Handwriting recognition is fully configurable. I haven't had problems with the size of the stylus.

    My biggest gripe is battery life - it's too short. Playing MP3s off an IBM microdrive only lasts ~80mins or so. Without the microdrive, it's longer, but it's only rated at 3.5hrs. It's not long enough to play MP3s to work, use it at work occasionally, then MP3s back home (I currently have a 3-4 hr commute each day).

    The IR port is perfectly located on the left hand side (unlike the iPAQ, which has it on the top). This means I can stick the Zaurus and my mobile phone in my left hand (the phone has an IR port on the right), use the stylus with my right hand, and browse the web/download email while walking around (useful while waiting for a train).

    Opera is nice, but the version I have doesn't have an option to switch off image download. The Opera on my Psion does, and this really speeds up web browsing. Tabbed browsing would also be nice. Lack of both of these means pages are slow to download, and you can't be reading another page while waiting for the next to download etc.

    Despite the odd downside, I like it.

    --
    I'm a number, not a free man!
  117. The new Sony Clie is cool too! by Choron · · Score: 1

    Sony just released a new PDA in Japan named Clie PEG-NR70 that may be even cooler than the Zaurus, even though it's not running Linux, but Palm compatibility means lots of cool software too !

    You got an flippable keyboard with much bigger keys (the Zaurus ones are really tiny, I can tell you for I own one myself), and all the usual cool stuff (MP3 player, optional camera, acts a universal remote control, ...).

    It sells for about US $500 in Japan, and no planned US release I could see...

    --
    "Naughty, naughty, naughty, you filthy old soomka !"
  118. Re:Walking On Broken Glass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, the anonymous poster (I post to /. at least 3000 times a day) steal this FP leaving many orphan to starve and live on the dregs of latter posts.

  119. http://sharpelectronics.com/browser.html?fuck_you_ by Big+G · · Score: 1

    http://sharpelectronics.com/browser.html?fuck_you_ and_your_ignorant_IE_NN_requirement

    Let's see if we can float to the top of their usage reports. :)

  120. But Sharp still hasn't fixed its website by njdj · · Score: 1

    The web page that Sharp dedicates to its handheld is here

    But if you're using a typical Linux browser and go to this page, all you'll see is a statement that you have to use Netscape or MSIE, with a link to where you can download MSIE.

    While Sharp is shitting on the web community like this, I personally will not buy anything from Sharp. There is no valid excuse for it. Sharp's excuse is probably that their web site was built by a college dropout who seemed to be a geek and was real cheap - but that's not a valid excuse.