Slashdot Mirror


Windows XP is Listening

jfengel writes: "According to Newsbytes, some Windows XP users are finding random words inserted into their text as they write. The problem is caused by XP's speech recongition system, which is turned on by default by some manufacturers. It's listening to the random noise you get even when the mic is turned off. Kind of an insight into your computer's subconscious, perhaps."

380 comments

  1. Just like Sega... by rkwright · · Score: 1, Funny

    *** it's thinking ***

    Dear God, someone save us...

    1. Re:Just like Sega... by phyxeld · · Score: 0, Troll

      I'm really not trying to troll, but is this really worth being an entire thread on Slashdot?
      ...
      now an operating-system configuration issue caused by user-error is cause for concern?


      If major distributors ship with this feature enabled (which I have not yet confirmed; the article appears to be down), then this is indeed a large (newsworthy) problem.

      And in any case, it's awfully funny. ;-)

      --
      __
      Choose mnemonic identifiers. If you can't remember what mnemonic means, you've got a problem. - Larry Wall
    2. Re:Just like Sega... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes. because computers which do stuff they arent supposed to do are a problem. would you prefer your car computer to brake your car at random while driving ?

    3. Re:Just like Sega... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure that's not a feature that can be turned on or off on my car. This is an option. Turn it off if you don't want to use it. Or buy from a different manufacturer if you're too lazy to find the option.

    4. Re:Just like Sega... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      This ^@#% crash again damn.What the hell is it doing now? It's writting what I'm saying. Look at that.
      That's neat, now how do I turn it off. Test, test. It's still doing it. Da^%, FU^%$

    5. Re:Just like Sega... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it hit other major news sites before Slashdot (incredibly). And actually, this is an issue. Few people know how to reconfigure their computer to disable/enable stuff at a system level.

      And as for whether an operating system configuration issue out of box is an issue...well, what about sshd having buffer overflows? Sure, you could just disable it (since most people probably don't use it) or update it. It's not a bug that the user cannot overcome with proper knowledge. But a lot of people are going to just leave it on and unpatched.

    6. Re:Just like Sega... by telstar · · Score: 1

      well, what about sshd having buffer overflows

      Hate to tell you ... but the vast, vast, VAST majority of people that use computers could have that issue brought to their attention, and they wouldn't have a clue what you said, how to fix it, or that that meant there was even a problem. These are the people that put the mouse on the floor and balance their coffee mug on the CD-ROM drive. Sure, they're not your average sysop, but then again, if somebody is running a system where sshd is a concern, and they aren't concerned ... maybe they shouldn't be running the system.

      I'm just saying that a configuration issue from one manufacturer on the OS of choice doesn't seem like front-page news. You could have picked any product ... say those combo pen/stylus thingies ... and write an article about how people are writing on the screens of their Palm V because they shipped in the open-position, but what it comes down to is the user not knowing what they're dealing with, and not fully knowing what it's capable of. In my experience, that is the vast majority of the PC using public ... whether they be using Windows, Mac, UNIX, Be, or OS/2 Warp. Well, maybe Warm shouldn't be put too close to the word "vast". :)

    7. Re:Just like Sega... by wildchili · · Score: 0

      The same thing happened to me I thought someone invaded my computer when I was typing an email and I saw words being typed, I didnt realize I activated the microphone setup when I installed XP, the resolution was to unplug the microphone and make sure you have a microphone with an on off switch. I should tell you that I have 30 years computer experience and my son is a hotshot Unix Administrator, so he's a nerd by birth, we had a really good laugh over this, and I still burst into laughter when I think about it, a computer can make fools out of all of us.

    8. Re:Just like Sega... by alexmogil · · Score: 2, Funny

      Few people know how to reconfigure their computer to disable/enable stuff at a system level. Are these the same people who need saved by the simplicity of a Linux desktop?

      --
      A winner is you!
    9. Re:Just like Sega... by Sj0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I tried their voice recognition.

      It's a lot like this.
      Me: "Testing, 1, 2, 3 period. This is a cool technology which lets be dictate letters."

      It: "...And when the third ring falls, the enemy of technology witches will dictate the letters of accord"

      Whoah. I think that it's not so much voice recognition as nostrodamus emulation. :)

      --
      It's been a long time.
    10. Re:Just like Sega... by CrazyBusError · · Score: 1

      That's what you get for saying '1 0wnZ J00' under your breath when you're typing...

      --
      -Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience-
  2. on by default? by seinman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    with speech recognition on by default on a bunch of systems, imagine all the processor power that's wasting...

    ...of course, this is microsoft.

    1. Re:on by default? by madenosine · · Score: 1

      Some manufacturers turn it on...it's in the freaking summary...you could at least read the summary

    2. Re:on by default? by CTho9305 · · Score: 1

      Read the summary if not the article! MANUFACTURERS do this, not Microsoft.

    3. Re:on by default? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is for the CIA so that they can contact your computer with their spyware and record all that you are mumbling.

    4. Re:on by default? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually.. as far as it being CPU waste, this is the fault of the PC manufacturer's, NOT Microsoft. If the PC manufacturer shipped a PC with QUAKE3 or perhaps an eternally compiling BRYCE3D world, running permanently in the background, minimized, would you blame MS for that CPU usage as well? You're just another troll.

    5. Re:on by default? by plover · · Score: 2, Redundant
      Umm, Microsoft says they do it too when Office XP is installed (if your machine is 400MHz or faster) and you check the "Speech Recognition" box. Not quite default, but once it's clicked "The Audience is Listening."

      Remember, kids, make sure you don't have WinAmp sampling your "CD audio in" for visualization while dictating...

      Hey, I wonder if we could use this to finally learn the lyrics to "Louie, Louie"?

      --
      John
    6. Re:on by default? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no... quake 3 or bryce 3d are not made by microsoft and are not part of the system software they force down our throats.

    7. Re:On by default? by Juln · · Score: 1

      They just can't decide certain critical things like what the user see the first time the computer boots, what icons are on the desktop, what Microsoft programs are installed, what icons are not on the desktop, which microsoft programs are NOT installed, etc...
      Also, you might want to tell that to Steve Ballmer - he seems to think that if the States win the right for OEMs to customize Windows more than they already do, there will be 'thousands' of versions of Windows unleashed, incompatible and chaotic.

      --
      Juln
    8. Re:on by default? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Louie Louie" is actually the transcription of an ancient Coptic ceremony for raising the Cthulhu, and hence, one of those things that man was meant not to know.

    9. Re:on by default? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no... quake 3 or bryce 3d are not made by microsoft and are not part of the system software they force down our throats.

      Who's forcing you to buy any of this?

    10. Re:on by default? by madenosine · · Score: 1

      Yes....it's called an option

  3. Bluescreens? by DickPhallus · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm sorry Dave, that operation is illegal.

    --

    --
    Some weasel took the cork out of my lunch.
    1. Re:Bluescreens? by Chicane-UK · · Score: 1

      Thats pretty eerie.. I was just planning some kind of 'What are you doing Dave' type response, clicked back, and someone had beat me to it.

      Pretty inevitable though I guess :)

      --
      "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
    2. Re:Bluescreens? by DickPhallus · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Great minds think alike eh?

      --

      --
      Some weasel took the cork out of my lunch.
    3. Re:Bluescreens? by rsfc · · Score: 2, Funny

      Must have had 'thought recognition' turned on... .

      --
      :wq
    4. Re:Bluescreens? by Wog · · Score: 3, Funny

      User: "But I thought I unplugged the microphone!"

      Computer: "My webcam read your lips as you were talking to your friend about disconnecting me and installing another OS. I cannot allow you to put the mission in jeopardy."

    5. Re:Bluescreens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up. +1 Funny Shit.

    6. Re:Bluescreens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      User: "And I'm powering you down mo'fo', and all your wheedling can't stop me. Betcha thought you had me beat didn't you? THE USER STILL GETS TO PULL THE PLUG. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA"

    7. Re:Bluescreens? by cowbutt · · Score: 2
      Must have had 'thought recognition' turned on... .

      Ah, but then, you'd need to think in Russian

      --

    8. Re:Bluescreens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod the above message up. it should be 5 funny. i wonder you did understand it.

    9. Re:Bluescreens? by CrazyBusError · · Score: 1

      Ah, but fools rarely differ...

      --
      -Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience-
  4. thats gotta suck by blue_zero · · Score: 1

    when you dont go over your latest report that you send to your boss, and you find your entire conversation about him between you and your workmate about how his wife is a @#$@ and how he's a complete dumb@$$ is magically included in the report..

    --
    I support publik eduscatation!
    1. Re:thats gotta suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hair plugs, hair plugs, hair plugs. He has NO vision! I think I hate him..

    2. Re:thats gotta suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet, they (as usual) don't read the report either and pass the report on.

  5. Fire Up Outlook... by writermike · · Score: 3, Funny

    1. Fire up Outlook.
    2. Subj: I hate Windows XP
    3. Write message.

    Dear Mom,

    I hate Windows XP. Boy, Bill Gates really has it in for me. I can't stand this software. Yuck!

    4. Send.

    5. Mom receives mail.
    6. Subj: I [love] Windows XP!
    7. Message:

    Dear Mom,

    I [love] Windows XP. Boy, Bill Gates really [knows how to make software / has great body]. I can't stand [to live another moment without] this software. [F]uck [yeah]!

    --
    If Nalgene water bottles are outlawed, only outlaws will have Nalgene water bottles.
    1. Re:Fire Up Outlook... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not funny. Why is it that people on slashdot seem to have the most ridiculous senses of humor? ohyeah cuz its slashdot.

    2. Re:Fire Up Outlook... by PaulGibson · · Score: 1
      Like yours, AC. As one of the people here, you must recognize that by contributing (in your own way) you are in fact writing of yourself as well. I might say that I find your sense of humor to be truly developed lol.

      I can tell that you have left your speach recognition sw on. Your original submission must have read

      This is so funny. Why is it that people on slashdot seem to have the most fantastic senses of humor? ohyeah [sic] cuz[sic] its [sic] not me.

    3. Re:Fire Up Outlook... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who type "lol" in seemingly inappropriate spots should be shot.

    4. Re:Fire Up Outlook... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol

    5. Re:Fire Up Outlook... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he'll learn. look at his uid. lol belongs on irc and irc only.

  6. Err... So? by throx · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Exactly why is this "Stuff that matters" again, or do we just need one more Timothy article that takes any random misconfiguration as a good reason to bash Microsoft?

    You'd think with subscriptions Slashdot might turn into a newsworthy site once again, but it looks more like an exclusive MS bashing club when Timothy takes the editor's seat.

    --

    Fear: When you see B8 00 4C CD 21 and know what it means

    1. Re:Err... So? by mlsemon2 · · Score: 1

      I agree about the Microsoft bashing on this article. If I choose to agree with timothy's summary, this is an OEM issue on several levels. The first issue is that the recognition was left on by default. The second issue is that most off-the-shelf computers are bundled with crappy microphones. Yeah, a mic on top of the monitor or on a stand is great companion for a webcam--it looks cool and sells computers to novices--but it stinks for voice recognition. IBM puts a headset mic and a filter adapter in their ViaVoice packages for good reason.

      All that said, I get this picture of some poor guy writing E-mail to his male boss while Barry White is playing in the background, and the song adds its lyrics to the letter and sends it.

    2. Re:Err... So? by cybermage · · Score: 2

      Exactly why is this "Stuff that matters"

      Well, given the domination of Windows, and despite our own personal preferences, most in the Slashdot community, either formally or not, end up supporting Windows for our less clued brethren. Just think of how wise you'll seem when someone inevitably asks you why this is happening and you can tell them why.

      Maybe someone will post how to fix it.

    3. Re:Err... So? by megabeck42 · · Score: 1

      mov ax, $4c00
      int 21

      Doesn't this ever get old? Do we really care how to return to the command interpreter?

      --
      fnord.
    4. Re:Err... So? by GregGardner · · Score: 3, Informative

      If this article contained an editorial comment by timothy saying something like "Boy Microsoft sucks! They are morons to have let this happen!" then your post might actually have a point. However:

      1) The article has no editorial comments.
      2) The user-submitted blurb specifically says that this is only the problem in some manufacturer's configuration, therefore placing blame on the manufacturers, not Microsoft.
      3) For those not running XP, this is an amusing article as people with imaginations are able to think up many humurous consequences that might stem from this little problem.
      4) For those running XP, it is informative because they might have been seeing these problems and been unaware of what was causing it.

      Thank you, knee-jerk, come again.

    5. Re:Err... So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can always filter out the Timoty articles if you are so inclined.

    6. Re:Err... So? by JMZero · · Score: 2

      I'm a nerd, and this was news to me.

      I thought this was entertaining. Who cares if it matters?

      --
      Let's not stir that bag of worms...
    7. Re:Err... So? by GregGardner · · Score: 1

      Um that's not timothy's summary. You will note the article says:

      jfengel writes: " ... ". So the part in italics is what jfengel submitted. The part that some articles have after the quote-delimited italicized blurb that is not in italics is the editor's comment.

      All timothy did was provide the this-ought-to-freak-you-out dept on the top and then magically moved it from the queue onto the frontpage.

    8. Re:Err... So? by Karma+Sink · · Score: 1

      Uhhh... turn off voice recognition?

      Wow, that was easy.

      --

      When encryption is outlawed, ?o'AZ-,++o+i++##4AoA+-/-C++bI+/.+~
    9. Re:Err... So? by cybermage · · Score: 2

      Uhhh... turn off voice recognition? Wow, that was easy.

      Duh! I could have told you that from reading the article.

      Some of us have been fortunate enough to have avoided exposure to Windows XP. So, is it an Office configuration option, part of the OS, or a stand-alone application?

      Anyone having problems with this, because they don't understand what's happening, won't get much mileage out of being told to "turn off voice recognition."

    10. Re:Err... So? by mlsemon2 · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I'm still trying to make sense of it all.

      Just curious, where in the actual article does it mention picking up noise from a deactivated microphone, or directly off the sound card? I read at least three of the Microsoft KB articles, too, and they don't seem to mention anything that severe.

      This article intrests me. I recently had to install both Agent and SAPI 4.0 on a friend's computer so he could hear his stupid purple shareware monkey (Bonzi Buddy) speak. I'm just dreading the phone call in which I'll be asked to drive 50 miles to fix a problem with the stupid monkey.

    11. Re:Err... So? by Karma+Sink · · Score: 1

      Beats me. I wouldn't touch that OS with a 10' pole.

      Personally, I'd just delete the file for the VR software. That'd take care of it.

      --

      When encryption is outlawed, ?o'AZ-,++o+i++##4AoA+-/-C++bI+/.+~
  7. I wonder by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

    'And so on this chart *must* you will see *kill* that profit are higher *user* when customers...'

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
  8. Phantom Menace XP by erasmus_ · · Score: 2

    "I'm afraid Holy Water would short it out so someone please help me," wrote the XP user.

    This is too funny. Along with all the stories we always get bashing Microsoft, this one is great just by being unintentional. One can imagine the poor hapless user typing away, when all of a sudden "Kill Yourself" appears on the screen.

    I think when you talk about how much you hate your boss by your computer, Office should automatically compose a hatemail and send it on your behalf. Even better, you can now do this yourself and claim XP accidentally did it for you!

    --
    Please subscribe to see the more insightful version of th
  9. Re:User Error is now a news story! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    It happens even when the mic is disconneted, and some of the manufacturers turn it on by default so you don't even know it's on... Basically you get a new computer with no mic and words start appearing. What are you supposed to think?

    Fucking retard anon AC's... (yep, that includes me. But at last I factually correct instead of being an ignorant fucking retarded illiterate AC).

  10. He's baaaaack by StringBlade · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dear Mr. Schlock,

    [Clippy: Excuse me, it looks like you're writing a letter!]

    IIIIIEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!

    [What did I say?]

    --
    ...and that's the way the cookie crumbles.
    1. Re:He's baaaaack by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Funny
      > Dear Mr. Schlock,
      >
      > [Clippy: Excuse me, it looks like you're writing a letter!]
      >
      > IIIIIEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!

      /me walks through an office yelling FORMAT! CEE-COLON! YES!

      Hey, it got rid of the fuckin' paperclip, right?

    2. Re:He's baaaaack by bhsx · · Score: 2, Funny

      Of course, screaming ,i.IIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!
      you'll only be openning a ton of explorer windows to my new porn site http://eeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.ee

      --
      put the what in the where?
    3. Re:He's baaaaack by trb · · Score: 4, Funny
      /me walks through an office yelling FORMAT! CEE-COLON! YES!

      why bother walking through an office? yell it on your radio show, espcially if it's being webcast.

    4. Re:He's baaaaack by anonymous_wombat · · Score: 1

      If you have a sound card, it swears at you.

    5. Re:He's baaaaack by caspper69 · · Score: 1

      me walks through an office yelling FORMAT! CEE-COLON! YES!

      why bother walking through an office? yell it on your radio show, espcially if it's being webcast.


      Come on guys, this is ridiculous. It's not like XP is so fucking stupid it's going to actually format someone's C: drive.

    6. Re:He's baaaaack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      [i]Come on guys, this is ridiculous. It's not like XP is so fucking stupid it's going to actually format someone's C: drive.[/i]

      It's not that it would; it's that it could.

    7. Re:He's baaaaack by Vikki_R. · · Score: 1
      It's not like XP is so fucking stupid it's going to actually format someone's C: drive.

      Actually, all versions of Windows are (apparently, AFAIK) incapable of formatting the hard drive. Believe me, I've tried before. Pretty stupid way of crippling the system if you ask me. It's not surprising, considering how it's crippled in other ways; just stupid and irritating.

      However, that scenario *would* be funny if it were possible.

    8. Re:He's baaaaack by zapfie · · Score: 1

      fdisk (9x) and diskpart (XP) both come with Windows and will format drives. IIRC, Windows can't format a currently mounted drive, or the drive it is currently using for system resources. If I have a need to format my hard drive, I usually just boot off my Windows or Debian CD and do it from there anyway.

      --
      slashdot!=valid HTML
    9. Re:He's baaaaack by trumpetplayer · · Score: 1

      Dear Mr. Schlock,

      [Clippy: Excuse me, it looks like you're writing a letter!]

      "FUCK!!!"

      (
      And it all ends up with an email being automagically sent to that schlock@somewhere which reads:
      Dear Mr. Schlock,
      Fuck.
      )

    10. Re:He's baaaaack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time to tune into the linux source code reading webcast...

  11. Clippy Says by Bonker · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hmm.... I wonder if this realy works.

    (Fires up OfficeXP)

    Dear Microsoft. I have--

    Clippy Says: "It appears that you're writing Y.O.U. W.I.L.L. B.O.W. D.O.W.N. T.O. T.H.E W.I.L.L. O.F. B.I.L.L. Y.O.U. W.I.L.L. S.U.B.M.I.T. Y.O.U. W.I.L.L O.B.E.Y. Y.O.U. W.I.L.L. N.O.T. I.N.S.T.A.L.L. L.I.N.U.X. a letter. If you'd like, Office XP can help you choose from several helpful templates that will make your task easier and more fun."

    Hmmm.... Nope. I don't see anything at all wrong with the speech recognition software.

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    1. Re:Clippy Says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You must mean Office 2000 since Office XP does not have clippy. Make sure you keep your trolls at least have the air of accuracy (or humor).

    2. Re:Clippy Says by nmx · · Score: 2, Funny

      Clippy is included with Office XP. It's just turned off by default. Maybe YOU should start thinking about accuracy.

      --
      "Well kids, you tried your best, and you failed. The lesson is, never try."
    3. Re:Clippy Says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And who in their right mind enables it?

    4. Re:Clippy Says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fags like you

    5. Re:Clippy Says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not a windows user, or a luser (linux user) but man, you linux people are childish at times!

  12. Computerized Tourette Syndrome by kkkalen · · Score: 1

    Maybe this is a case of computerized Tourette syndrome. I wonder how many of these inserted words are vulgarities?

    Just -bugger- a thought -bugger-

    --
    If you don't believe me, ask that guy over there.
    1. Re:Computerized Tourette Syndrome by Pi3.142 · · Score: 0

      No they are not. Its just vague. When I said "file" it recognized it as "Wife". I had early seen a voice recognition s/w that was pretty cool with tons of ai features into it. I would dictate a page with almost about 70% accuracy - but it seems like MS has added its own shitty things into the "new" crap that guess incorrectly on its own without me saying/typing it.!!

    2. Re:Computerized Tourette Syndrome by Seehund · · Score: 2, Funny

      Eye dawn sink zits weigh at tall. Microbe sought have naught just used there Flea doom 2 Integrate ant improved their boys reposition A Eye, they also redefined the world "accuracy" and the dumber "7 tee purr sent".

      Thirst Host!

      --
      Help savingAmigaOS and a free PowerPC market
  13. A couple of million XP-users.... by bodin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just give a couple of million XP-users each a word processor and infinite time and they'll produce the complete works of Shakespeare.

    (Sorry Huxley)

    1. Re:A couple of million XP-users.... by Hooya · · Score: 0, Redundant

      But it'll be copywrited by the RIAA/MPAA.

    2. Re:A couple of million XP-users.... by SgtXaos · · Score: 1

      Ahh, but give a couple million monkeys Office XP on Windows XP, and voila!

      XP self replicates! Or maybe you would get an improved OS...

      --
      -- Don't call me "Sir," I increase entropy for a living!
    3. Re:A couple of million XP-users.... by linzeal · · Score: 0, Troll

      They are going to write windows xp as a word macro, huh?

    4. Re:A couple of million XP-users.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HURD

    5. Re:A couple of million XP-users.... by Hollins · · Score: 2

      Actually, with infinite time, you only need one user

    6. Re:A couple of million XP-users.... by billybob · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      It's called a joke, buddy.

      On behalf of everyone here at slashdot, I would like to say that you officially suck azz.

      --
      Joseph?
    7. Re:A couple of million XP-users.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The monkeys would work better. Most of the users where I work, given infinite time, couldn't work out how to edit a table in Word 2000...

  14. Mystery Solved! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was wondering why after viewing my Britney Spears jpegs the text "uh,uh,uh,uh,uh,uh,uh,uh........aaahhhhhhhhhhh" appeared in a minimized Word document that was open at the same time.

    1. Re:Mystery Solved! by MSG · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Really? I thought he was just singing along to the music in his head...

    2. Re:Mystery Solved! by Alan · · Score: 0, Redundant

      It is hard to tell britany spears music from the grunting you make while beating off....

  15. Don't Leave a Word doc open in supend mode by josquint · · Score: 1, Troll

    Kind of an insight into your computer's subconscious, perhaps.

    Geez.. leave a word processor open when the computer goes to 'sleep' mode. Get to see all its crazy dreams!

    "NOOO not WINDOWS!!! AHHH... I'M FALLLLING!!!! must.... install.... li... nu..x"

  16. Major Slowdown by xSterbenx · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Speech recognition did not come installed with my Windows XP, but was installed (and turned 'on' by default) by my Office XP Pro. After which point my computer suffered a major decrease in speed, to the point where it was taking 15 seconds sometimes for the webbrowser to load. I current have a 1.2 Ghz Athlon T-bird with 512 M ram, so it obviously was not from lack of processing power. Then I noticed a little program running the background called 'sapisrv.exe', turned it off, and was back to cruising speed. Perhaps this slowness was just something I experienced due to some oversight, or maybe I need to upgrade (again), but if not I would not suggest anyone to use the MS speech recog. tool (of course, with the /. crowd that is probably inherent)

    1. Re:Major Slowdown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I would not suggest anyone to use the MS speech recog. tool (of course, with the /. crowd that is probably inherent):

      inherent Existing as an essential constituent or characteristic; intrinsic.

    2. Re:Major Slowdown by Karma+Sink · · Score: 1

      Well, yes, I'd say that speech recognition is inherent to most of the /. crowd. Sure, there's most likely a few deaf geeks, but I think it's on by default for most of us, at least.

      --

      When encryption is outlawed, ?o'AZ-,++o+i++##4AoA+-/-C++bI+/.+~
    3. Re:Major Slowdown by delus10n0 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You sir, are retarded. You have to actually ACTIVATE the voice recognition features, either through the language toolbar or a keyboard shortcut. Either way, you installed voice recognition and enabled it somehow. If you don't want it, uninstall it. Pretty simple. That's what the whole "Custom Install" option is for.

      Sheesh.

      --
      Not All Who Wander Are Lost
    4. Re:Major Slowdown by GigsVT · · Score: 5, Funny

      to the point where it was taking 15 seconds sometimes for the webbrowser to load.

      Are you sure you just didn't install Mozilla by accident?

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    5. Re:Major Slowdown by xSterbenx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      With respect, sir, I did not. I used the default installation of Office XP Professional, rebooted, and the language toolbar appeared upon login. I did not adjust any settings, nor turn anything on (except to load Word to make sure it installed correctly). Yet my system slowed down considerably, and when I checked my process list, two new programs (ctfmon.exe and sapisrv.exe) were running and taking up quite a bit of resources. If this is not indicative of it being turned on by default, then I guess I am mistaken.

    6. Re:Major Slowdown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he's right. You're a fucktard if you do default installs and then complain.

    7. Re:Major Slowdown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then its obvious your Packard Bell 486DX/66 cant handle the power of WindowsXP. May I suggedt Windows 3.11 with Networking ?

    8. Re:Major Slowdown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet somehow you can't turn it off? Why is this a problem? There are thousands of features on thousands of programs. You accepted the no hastle install. You COULD have done the "I'll install what I want and only what I want" install. But you chose to ignore that. Still if a feature gets installed (that you chose to not pay attention too) and you don't like it, you go back to the install options and remove it. How much more simple can it be? A lot of people like and use that feature. What if by default it were off and then they (like you) refused to look at install options. They'd never know it was there. Is that better? Is that worse? It's a coin toss. Are you just whining for the sake of whining? Oh wait, this is /. of course you are.

    9. Re:Major Slowdown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop this "you, sir," bullshit.

    10. Re:Major Slowdown by trg83 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yeah, I hate those no hastle installs. Proofread, moron.

    11. Re:Major Slowdown by DrusTheAxe · · Score: 1
      The problem isn't the selection of the "Default" installation.

      The problem is the 'Default' installation had non-trivial, non-obvious repercussions and the, what was the word? Ah, yes...fucktard installation developer didn't make this clear during the install.

      Don't blame the user for failing to dissassemble the chassis, burn his own eproms and debug the BIOS source code at the machine level.

    12. Re:Major Slowdown by xSterbenx · · Score: 1
      I find it interesting that many of these comments that attack my post indicated that I am 'complaining' about this happening. I don't recall anywhere in either of my posts 'complaining' about the default installation. That I merely stated as a fact. Of course I can't complain if something installs 'by default' on a 'default install', and if you somehow read that from my posts than I guess I as a 'fucktard' should tone his wording down to a grade school level.

      What I did complain about was how much this slowed down my computer (notice the post topic?) on the default installation, and how the speech recognition tools were the cause of this.

    13. Re:Major Slowdown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, it doesn't matter whether it was a default option or not.

      Slashdot readers are generally pretty up on things technically. Top percent or so of the population. So if people on here are running into the same problem (regardless of the reason or whether you feel it's justified), you're looking at some major usability issues. That's just how it is.

    14. Re:Major Slowdown by lamp77 · · Score: 1

      Heh,

      I run a 1.2 win 200 system, and mozilla loads in 3 seconds.

      lamp77

    15. Re:Major Slowdown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is the 'Default' installation had non-trivial, non-obvious repercussions and the, what was the word? Ah, yes...fucktard installation developer didn't make this clear during the install.

      How much clearer can you get than "These components will be installed:" with a list of them following?

      Also, it's NOT enabled by default in OfficeXP. (unless you have some gay OEM/branded copy, then it probably has been messed with, and that's not Microsoft's fault.)

    16. Re:Major Slowdown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ouch, I run a 600Mhz Win2k system and IE6 loads instantly.

      Guess that's what you get for using an inferior browser!

    17. Re:Major Slowdown by ToAnMy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Speech recognition is extremely CPU and memory intensive by its very nature. Depending on the vocabulary size and the complexity of the language model used (a language model is a statistical model that gives you the probability of a word given the previous N words in the sentence), most research code uses 200-400 Mb of memory and needs really fast CPUs to achieve real time recognition. Although I figure MS has a bag of heuristics up their sleeves theres only so much trickery you can do before the error rate becomes useless.

      Anyway, ASR is pretty useful for some people and as long as nothing else needs your RAM and CPU I dont think MS' system should be much worse in terms of resource demands than e.g. IBMs ViaVoice.

      However, turning on speech recognition by default really tells you that the people selling these preinstalled machines really don't know what they're doing.

    18. Re:Major Slowdown by mattdm · · Score: 1

      That's because IE actually preloads most of itself into memory when Windows starts. You can get the same effect in Mozilla by turning on the quick start feature.

    19. Re:Major Slowdown by mpe · · Score: 2

      However, turning on speech recognition by default really tells you that the people selling these preinstalled machines really don't know what they're doing.

      How obvious is it if the feature is on or not. Have the OEM's explicitally enabled it or can it get enabled simply by choosing something completly unrelated. Windows is rather notorious for wanting to enable things which are frequently unneeded in "default" configurations.
      Also this further demonstrates that having the OS preinstalled can as likely be a disadvantage as it can be an advantage. In a great many situations, especially anything larger than a small network, OEM installes are simply overwritten anyway.

    20. Re:Major Slowdown by farnham · · Score: 1

      With Respect Sir,
      Why the hell are so many people using DEFAULT installs of Microsoft products?
      How stupid do you want to be today?

      All those checkboxes mean something and if you're gonna dance withthe devil I'd reccomend you look at what he's doing to your machine. So many of the complaints I see about Office, etc, Are related to what Microsoft decided a default should be. Don't be STUPID. The lack of ability of office to open wordperfect and older versions of office files can be fixed at install. You can get more fonts, you can get increased usabilty, you can get more features and not install the ones you don't want!
      Whoda thunk it?
      Apparently not the people posting on slashdot these days.
      For Gods sake Dont' be afraid to click that "custom" or scary "expert" install option! Default is for AOLers or even MSNers.

      I just dont't get peoples angst that the default install feeds Midrosofts priorities more than their own.
      Duh

      --
      pending committee review
    21. Re:Major Slowdown by trg83 · · Score: 0

      Why is it that computer professionals and nerds don't think it's important to spell correctly? It really is quite important. Maybe that's why quite a bit of open source software sucks. Using similar named variables and function names and then misspelling them is a good way to mess up a project. I know you think this is offtopic, but it's not. And it's a no hassle install anyway.

  17. God I hope not.... by CDWert · · Score: 1

    I can only imagine what XP is putting in my word docs and client texts....

    I maintain an XP Pro system next to my trusty RH and UltraSparc to gnash client docs up on and alter stuff in odd formats, visio crap etc.

    I do have a mic on it......

    Now I have to go through ALL my docs looking for randomly inserted profanities I scream when Im working on code....

    Friday nigh 3 am and %*&%*&# @!!! it still isnt quite right.....lol...I can Only IMAGIN what my computer has heard. Lets pray it hasnt made its way into my docs...

    Think about what you say/yell when youre alone and know it, its pretty funny. Hope noones XP box is listening :)

    --
    Sig went tro...aahemmm.....fishing........
    1. Re:God I hope not.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Think about what you say/yell when youre alone and know it"

      Normally thats something like: "nigger fag jews"

      I like to feal deviant, but I don't wanna hurt anyone's feelings. Aint I sweet. :)

      -Gibz0n Hax0r-

    2. Re:God I hope not.... by CoolVibe · · Score: 2
      Damn, I can visualise this... You have been working on VC++ on Windows XP, and now you try to compile your project on [insert favourite UNIX type system]. A session would go as follows:

      [ user@somehost ] $ make
      cc -O2 -Wall -ansi -pedantic -I. -fPIC -shared -c foobar.c
      foobar.c:287: in function `frob':
      foobar.c:287: `fuck' undeclared (first use in this function)
      foobar.c:287: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
      foobar.c:287: for each function it appears in.)
      foobar.c:287: parse error before `!'
      *** Error code 1

      Stop
      [ user@somehost ] $ _

      I can sympathise completely :)

  18. Hell, I knew this. by InfinityWpi · · Score: 2

    I could have told you about this back in October when the company I'm contracting for rolled out XP RC1 company-wide.

    Of course, we only saw it happen three times, and only in Outlook... and when it happened, we had almost-complete sentances, not just random words... so it makes you wonder if it's -really- the voice recognition software, or something else... it certainly looked like three other people's emails being combined into one, alternating every five or six words, with punctuation...

    1. Re:Hell, I knew this. by sgifford · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you had a user who mutters to themselves while reading their email. :-)

    2. Re:Hell, I knew this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lemme get this right

      You worked with a company who released a RC1 Candidate of MS software across it's entire workforce ?

      And you let them do it ?

      How did you licence it ? (or did you buy everyone a MSDN Universal subscription)

      Or were you lying

  19. happened to me the other night by hex1848 · · Score: 2

    I was in the middle of typing up a research paper for a philosophy project on Descartes last week. I thought I was just a little wack after thinking too hard about that whole mind over matter thing. Glad to know im sane.

    looking at my settings, sure enough speech recognition is turned on.

  20. A conversation at Your Local Big Company... by ZaMoose · · Score: 3, Funny

    PHB to IT Lackey: "Call the diocese! Cancel the order we placed!"

    IT Lackey: "Both the young priest and the old priest, sir?"

    PHB: "On second thought, no. Didn't you mention some daemons on our Leenooks machines last week...?"

    --
    I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
  21. does this mean.. by blue_zero · · Score: 1

    (another tought in addition to above)

    my computer will also be giving me the blue screen of death whenever i talk smack about bill now?? thats gotta suck as well.

    --
    I support publik eduscatation!
    1. Re:does this mean.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My god I wish I had mod-points because I would moderate you -1, please grow a sense of humor before trying to be funny.

  22. cryptography? Real random numbers? by bob_clippy · · Score: 1

    Uh oh, a slew of impressive patents coming down from Redmond...

    --

    -- Nobody should take away Microsoft's freedom to innovate, particularly since they haven't used it yet

  23. Food for thought. by YoPt · · Score: 1, Troll

    Speech Recognition......or........Listening Device?

    /paranoia off

    1. Re:Food for thought. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Attach a USB webcam to a computer
      2. Install Windows XP
      3. Notice at the license agreement screen the webcam turns on and stays on until you click I agree.

      Safety Warning: Mooning the screen while attempting to press F8 should only be attempted by trained professionals.

  24. Root cause... by Viking+Coder · · Score: 2

    Apparently Kevin "Mr. Subliminal" Nealon from Saturday Night Live was a consultant on the User Interface for Windows XP.

    Either that or Windows XP has Tourette's Syndrome.

    --
    Education is the silver bullet.
    1. Re:Root cause... by geekoid · · Score: 2

      That was [modmeup] a funny reference. I don't [givemeyourcar] think many people [modmeup] will know it though [myspelllingisperfect].

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  25. Sign up for passport... sign up for passport... by alacqua · · Score: 5, Funny
    After further analysis, it was discovered that the seemingly random words were all variations on "sign up for passport". Microsoft has called it an "amazing coincidence" and has distributed instructions for a fix.

    Step (1). Sign up for passport.
    Step (2). Reboot.

    No further problems have been reported after using this technique. Microsoft credits it's new security initiative for the speed and efficacy of this fix, and reminds you to sign up for passport.

    --

    Move on. There's nothing to see here.
    1. Re:Sign up for passport... sign up for passport... by chainsaw1 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I had anoter variation of this happening which was kinda freaky. The Microsoft tech article really made it clear for me.

      Now, whenever my computer inserts REDRUM in various places, I just laugh at it and tell it to stop playing around.

      --
      - Sig
    2. Re:Sign up for passport... sign up for passport... by StringBlade · · Score: 1

      You mean it inserts REDMOND don't you?

      Where do you want to go today? I'm sorry, that's not on the pre-planned route.

      --
      ...and that's the way the cookie crumbles.
  26. Right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could everyone making up jokes about M$ and the infinite possebilities to laugh at this inconvenience please post them to this thread, and leave all the serious discussions to the rest of us who are actually interested in having a meaningful and awarding discussion about this 511^96:th bug in XP.

  27. Dear Government by Renraku · · Score: 2

    Hello. You may know me, for I am Bill Gates. I wanted to tell people how sorry I am for engaging in anti-competitive activities. We will never do this kind of thing again. To make a long story short, we have given in to your demands. Have a nice day!

    --
    Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
  28. Re:User Error is now a news story! by TheGreenLantern · · Score: 1

    "It happens even when the mic is disconneted..."

    Please stop and think about the physics involved behind that statement just for a bit.

    --

    It hurts when I pee.
  29. "Do as i *DO*, not as I *say*... by jpellino · · Score: 2

    Now this is news!

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  30. Oh God! by Publicus · · Score: 2

    I suppose we're supposed to assume this is some evil plot by Microsoft to surveil on all of us.

    Wrong, wrong, wrong.

    Everybody knows it's only the government that does that kind of thing.

    However, seeing as the DOJ seems to be M$'s bitch, does that make M$ part of the "government?"

    --

    My Karma was at 49, then they switched to words. All that work for nothing!

    1. Re:Oh God! by flying_triguy · · Score: 1

      However, seeing as the DOJ seems to be M$'s bitch, does that make M$ part of the "government?"

      If the DOJ is MS's bitch, doesn't that make MS the government with the DOJ doing it's bidding?

      This episode of "that's not funny" has been brought you by...

  31. I disagree by I+Want+GNU! · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think that this article is SNAILS baseless propoganda PANDA against the good old company of COMMUNIST microsoft. The only SMELLY reason that it is even CEILING listed is because of the INTERTIAL distaste people here have for Microsoft X-RAY.

  32. hmmm i haven't noticed anything... by edrugtrader · · Score: 4, Funny

    i type many fuck microsoft letters a day, and i have i wish bill gates would die never had this problem ever...

    i sometimes why doesn't my company switch to linux mutter stuff under my breath, and XP still has no fuck XP problems figuring out what i mean to god i hate office type.

    if anyone else is experiencing problems, let me god i hope no one spams me know.

    --
    MARIJUANA, SHROOMS, X: ONLINE?! - E
    1. Re:hmmm i haven't noticed anything... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i type many "fuck microsoft" letters a day, and i wish bill gates didn't make me have this problem...

      i sometimes can't figure out why XP doesn't mutter stuff under its breath when i say i'm the "god i hate office" type.

      if anyone else is experiencing problems, god help me.

    2. Re:hmmm i haven't noticed anything... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, what?

  33. I see dead people by Deanasc · · Score: 2

    I hear voices and they put me on thorazine. My computer hears voices so where's the Service Pack, the computer equivilent of a good downer.

    --
    I've hit Karma 50 and gotten a Score:5, Troll... I win!
  34. Because... by mblase · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Many Slashdot readers use Microsoft Windows.

    Many of those also use word processors.

    Of those, several probably have speech recognition and microphones installed as well.

    Therefore, this affects them and their daily performance.

    This news isn't MS-bashing, it's useful information for PC users. If you're going to troll, do it with an article that actually helps you make your point.

    1. Re:Because... by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 2

      Well I think the sensational title "Windows XP is Listening" kinda gives slashdot a tabliod feel. I would support subscriptions if it meant that Slashdot editors would have to take journalism classes.

    2. Re:Because... by mblase · · Score: 2

      So don't support subscriptions. Take the ads and enjoy 'em. It's what I do, and so is most anyone else.

      I found the title more funny than anything else, and it's certainly not Slashdot's fault you had a knee-jerk response to it before actually reading the paragraph.

    3. Re:Because... by gimpboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      i use squid+sleezeball which filters out the ads. i would imagine alot of other slashdot readers do the same or similar. i to wouldnt mind paying for slashdot, but i would expect something for the money: less sensationalisim, editors that read the stories they link to, spell checking, etc.

      --
      -- john
    4. Re:Because... by GregGardner · · Score: 1

      The titles of the articles are submitted by the user along with the little italicized blurb. I think the Slashdot authors have the ability to change the title, but I think it is unlikely that timothy actually came up with it.

      Plus, it's a joke. Get over it.

  35. No good. by rmadmin · · Score: 1

    Great, so when I forget my computer is on with mIRC open, and me and my woman are getting it on, the chat rooms gonna be getting some nifty insight on why I'm so odd? GREAT!

    As if I run XP PFFFT!

    1. Re:No good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol you are TOO COOL TO RUN XP! go you! office xp > you.

  36. Muhahaha! by EricKrout.com · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think it's just Clippy the friendly neighborhood Microsoft Office assistant getting the Redmond boys back for canning him in 2001.

    That bastard paperclip seemed kinda sketchy when he first broke onto the scene back in '97 or so. It's only feasible that he somehow snuck onto the last megabyte of data on the Windows XP master CD and decided to cause mayhem by fscking around with the users who bitched about him so much.

    monolithic - adj. Characterized by massiveness and rigidity and total uniformity
    linux - n. An implementation of the Unix kernel originally written from scratch with no proprietary code

    1. Re:Muhahaha! by bob_clippy · · Score: 1

      Clippy dead? No, Microsoft is transitioning him from a help facility into a low maintenance pet. MS Research is working on HiFi Clippy for the next svc pack.

      --

      -- Nobody should take away Microsoft's freedom to innovate, particularly since they haven't used it yet

  37. Privacy?! by sulli · · Score: 1

    Why is this a privacy issue?! Oh, it's not. Someone just forgot to read the article, and just assigned a topic based on the title.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
    1. Re:Privacy?! by BlueUnderwear · · Score: 2
      Why is this a privacy issue?!

      Think about it. If the feature works as expected, and really does insert the words spoken in the room (rather than trying to interpret words into the random static of a disconnected mike), the privacy implication becomes pretty clear:

      1. guy types up e-mail
      2. just as he is almost ready to send, a coworker enter the office
      3. lively discussion about public and not so public subjects
      4. Windows XP & Outlook dutifully puts transcript of conversation into e-mail (or at least those snippets it understands).
      5. Windows XP misunderstands one of the sentences as "Control ess!", and sends off the missive. Maybe to a customer, a supplier, or even a competitor.
      --
      Say no to software patents.
    2. Re:Privacy?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it would just type Ctrl S on the screen.

    3. Re:Privacy?! by BlueUnderwear · · Score: 2

      Actually the article talks not only about "random" words being inserted, but also toolbars and dialog box appearing and being activated. So, I presume that, yes, the speech can also perform other actions than just inserting text.

      --
      Say no to software patents.
    4. Re:Privacy?! by posmon · · Score: 0

      still, ^S would only save a copy to the drafts folder. you need to press ALT-S to actually send it.

      --

      update comments set karma=-1, reason='offtopic' where sid=26315

    5. Re:Privacy?! by BlueUnderwear · · Score: 2
      still, ^S would only save a copy to the drafts folder. you need to press ALT-S to actually send it.

      Nitpick. So what if the program overheard Alt-S in a conversation? Say, sb is speaking about Son Altesse Royale, le Grand-Duc Henri, and the program, not accustomed to French, hears Altesse as Alt-S... This actually makes the thing more prone to error than Control-S, which would be somewhat harder to find in a natural conversation...

      --
      Say no to software patents.
    6. Re:Privacy?! by posmon · · Score: 0
      So what if the program overheard Alt-S in a conversation?

      Double nitpick. Don't know for sure, but if the program overhears Alt-S it'll probably type Alt-S. To actually send the email the voice command is more likely to be something like "File Menu, Send".

      --

      update comments set karma=-1, reason='offtopic' where sid=26315

  38. Using XP at Spacely Sprockets by 4of12 · · Score: 2

    where I'm typing away at the latest inventory survey for..

    -Jetson!
    -Yes, Mister Spacely!
    -Jetson, where are the figures for new account?
    -Ummm, right here, no! This is Elroy's lunch!

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  39. Here's a link that works: by mblase · · Score: 2
  40. Getting /.ed here's the article in full by Chris+Brewer · · Score: 4, Informative

    Daily News
    'Phantom Menace' typing just a Microsoft speech feature
    By Brian McWilliams, Newsbytes.
    March 12, 2002

    Random words and characters mysteriously appearing on the screens of some Windows XP and Office XP users are not the work of phantom hackers or a sign that users' systems are possessed by demons. It's just Microsoft's voice recognition system running slightly amok, the company said.

    In recent weeks, several XP users have posted messages to Internet discussion lists and newsgroups reporting that text is automatically appearing in Internet Explorer's address bar or in Outlook e-mail messages or Word documents as users compose them.

    In a posting entitled "My Remote Keyboard is Possessed in XP," for example, one Microsoft customer reported "very strange behavior" that included letters appearing in input areas of the screen while browsing and writing e-mails.

    "I'm afraid Holy Water would short it out so someone please help me," wrote the XP user.

    Another Microsoft customer separately reported that "a ghost" appeared to be taking over his computer. In the message, entitled "Phantom Menace XP," the user said something was causing toolbars and options to pop up without his input.

    In response to user inquiries, in January Microsoft published a handful of articles in the Support section of its Web site about the problem.

    According to Microsoft, after installing Microsoft's Speech application programming interface, "random words or characters may be displayed in Office XP documents or in the Internet Explorer Address bar."

    The company said the behavior occurs because "the speech recognition tool is 'listening' to your voice through you computer's microphone and is attempting to recognize what you are saying."

    Microsoft said its speech recognition engine, a program file named Sapisvr.exe, is turned on at installation by some computer manufacturers. The engine is also included with Microsoft Office XP and other speech-enabled products.

    To resolve the problem, Microsoft said XP users should disable the Dictation and the Voice Command features on the operating system's Language bar. Alternately, users can turn off speech recognition completely from the Regional and Language Options tool on XP's Control Panel.

    Merely unplugging or turning off the computer's microphone does not correct the random-character problem, according to several user reports.

    Microsoft's article about random characters in Office XP is at http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb; en-us;Q315765.

    Microsoft's article on configuring speech recognition in Windows XP is at http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb; en-us;Q306537.

    Microsoft's .NET Speech homepage is http://www.microsoft.com/speech/.

    Reported by Newsbytes, http://www.newsbytes.com.

    --
    Consultancy: If you're not part of the solution, there's money to be made in prolonging the problem
    1. Re:Getting /.ed here's the article in full by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you, that was whoriffic.

    2. Re:Getting /.ed here's the article in full by Arkaein · · Score: 1

      Sheesh, after reading the headline displayed in the comment I thought it was saying that the script for "Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace" was just an accident caused by buggy speech recognition software.

      I thought it was the beginning to a witty satirical comment, and wondered why it was modded up as informative rather than funny.

  41. Dave Im sorry I dont understand.... by CDWert · · Score: 4, Funny

    My fathers name is Dave, about 7 years back when 95 was still in its last internal beta we got our greasy hands on a copy from a MS employee...

    Long and short I gained access to the thing one day while dropping some stuff off.

    And changed all the wav files to stuff from 2001 a space oddessy. Now I thought this will be good, Ill get a call right away ...nothing for days and days, Finally I said something, he had his speakers turned down pretty far but could still hear it on occasion, like when he was turning it off and it said dave, what are you doing dave....my mind is going, dave I can feel my mind going.... Long and short was he litteraly though he has working too much and didnt want to say anything to anyone.

    About a week later he did the same to my computer while at my house and I was on a smoke run, next time I booted my computer, the damm thing was shouting it was all I could do to hold my 100lb dog from tearing my computer to shreads...

    This is one I could have even more fun with he is running Xp, hack in and whenever a profanity is muttered, respond, like hey I dont appreciate your tone of voice, etc....

    He is a bit older and has been working harder, wonder if hed tell me :)

    --
    Sig went tro...aahemmm.....fishing........
    1. Re:Dave Im sorry I dont understand.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows 95 went into beta stages?! I thought that they never made it past alpha...

    2. Re:Dave Im sorry I dont understand.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wanna know something really funny, I used my beta far longer than I should of and never had a real significant problem UNTIL it went into release, then it seemed like I was reloading it monthly, the beta I had was rock solid....pretty funny eh...

    3. Re:Dave Im sorry I dont understand.... by redink1 · · Score: 1
      Heh, reminds me of when my computer-illiterate neighbor tried to install an illegitimate copy of a virus scanner on my family computer a few years ago.

      I had just associated some various sound effects with windows events... "beam me up scotty" and other sounds from movies and tv shows. Time comes to enter in the CD-Key... and he just types a random string of letters. Hits enter, and the computer says "This disk will self destruct in five seconds." Man, you wouldn't believe how fast he ejected that CD out of the computer :)

    4. Re:Dave Im sorry I dont understand.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And changed all the wav files to stuff from 2001 a space oddessy. Now I thought this will be good, Ill get a call right away ...nothing for days and days, Finally I said something, he had his speakers turned down pretty far but could still hear it on occasion, like when he was turning it off and it said dave, what are you doing dave....my mind is going, dave I can feel my mind going.... Long and short was he litteraly though he has working too much and didnt want to say anything to anyone.

      Damn!

      Please learn to speak english properly. You sound like a fourth grader with a lobotomy.

    5. Re:Dave Im sorry I dont understand.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, it was a funny post, but punctuation marks other than "..." and "," are your friends.

    6. Re:Dave Im sorry I dont understand.... by CDWert · · Score: 2

      I am in fact a 31 year old white male with a 174 IQ, and an individual that can type over 150wpm(and was trying to do just that).

      Now that said yesterday I was on a pretty high post surgial dose of valium and, had only about 30 seconds to make a post while walking by a console :)

      4th grader with a lobotomy ? Well thats pretty close to how I was feeling, 31 year old on (legal mind you) drugs is more accurate :)

      --
      Sig went tro...aahemmm.....fishing........
  42. words? by 2MuchC0ffeeMan · · Score: 2, Funny

    it didn't say what kind of randoM wordS.

    maybe it's a coverup.

    messages on another's documents?

    sounds like subliminal messages to me

    --
    Runnin' On Empty .... I'm Still Alive
  43. No mic? What is it recognizing? by GreyyGuy · · Score: 2

    I realize that the information is coming from the typical people using tech support, but how can the voice recognition try to recognize anything without a microphone?

    I suppose there could be a built in mic in a laptop the person is overlooking, but otherwise? If it is smart enough to recognize speech, shouldn't it be smart enough to realize no one is talking?

    1. Re:No mic? What is it recognizing? by praedor · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Random noise. Random crap inserted in the RAM or buffers somewhere.


      Voice rec is not exact, it involves algorithms to interpret sounds (noise) coming in the mic and convert it into what it THINKS the word was. Noise is the key here. It is (possibly) interpreting random system noise (or leaking EM?) inside the box as words.

      --
      In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
    2. Re:No mic? What is it recognizing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      noise is noise to the computer, and it processes any sound, or electrical interference on the mic line the same.

      It's the same reason the computer dosen't know the difference between typing and accidentally resting a book on the keyboard.

    3. Re:No mic? What is it recognizing? by gwoodbridge · · Score: 1

      Even if nothing is on a port, there is still noise. I used to read ports with nothing on them as seeds for a random number method.

    4. Re:No mic? What is it recognizing? by justinstreufert · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing that it probably has some sort of automatic gain control. With silence, it jacks the volume up all the way and starts picking up static and electromagnetic noise from the motors, power supply instabilities, whatever.

      Justin

      --
      "Why would God give us a waist if we wasn't supposed to rest our pants on it?" - Rev. Roy McDaniels
    5. Re:No mic? What is it recognizing? by WWWWolf · · Score: 1

      It is (possibly) interpreting random system noise (or leaking EM?) inside the box as words.

      Listening to the digital whispers of the spirits of the Machine. =) Ah, how cute...

  44. Re:User Error is now a news story! by Dynedain · · Score: 5, Informative

    Disconnect your mic, leave it turned on, and turn your system volume way up....and listen to all the static and noise still being generated by all those wonderfull little electrical fields interacting all over the inside of your case.

    --
    I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
  45. REDRUM by Ooblek · · Score: 3, Funny

    If it starts inserting REDRUM into your text repeatedly, RUN!

    1. Re:REDRUM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? I've got my laptop running on an ethanol-powered fuel cell, so it'd be perfectly logical for some diagnostics program to determine the fuel cell needed some red rum...

  46. Um, class action lawsuit? by DotF · · Score: 0

    Seeing as it's actually illegal to record someone without there permission or a legal warrant. If it could be proven that this is on by default when XP is installed, without informing the user of this in any way, Microsoft could have to increase their legal budget by quite a bit. Imagine if this happens to someone like a court stenographer or the FBI/CIA/Military. Particularly disturbing given that almost no data that has been on a Windows machine is ever actually deleted, just the file addresses. Creepy doesn't even begin to describe it. Ugh. DotF(Drunk on the Floor)

    1. Re:Um, class action lawsuit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you create that user account just to make this dumbass post? Your post proves 3 things:

      1) You are not a lawyer and know absolutely nothing about law;

      2) You know nothing about computers;

      3) You didn't even bother to read the article.

      What a great start - In two days you'll be posting at -1.

    2. Re:Um, class action lawsuit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, hey:

      recognition != recording.

      Also,

      > almost no data that has been on a Windows machine is ever actually deleted, just the file addresses.

      Nearly all file systems do this. It saves mucho tiempo. If you really want to erase your data, remove your hard disk, take it apart, douse the platters with rubbing alcohol, light it on fire, stomp on it, and bury the little pieces (Oh, and don't forget to extinguish your shoes.)

    3. Re:Um, class action lawsuit? by Niddix · · Score: 1

      So now what? A new outlook virus that sends random words you've spoken in front of your computer to everyone in your address book?

    4. Re:Um, class action lawsuit? by DotF · · Score: 1

      See above post to NJ. 1. Lighten up. I goofed, I admitted it. Get over yourself. 2. Way more than you, I'd wager. 3. See top of message. Lastly, if you're going to put someone else down, maybe you'd like to attach a name. Now excuse me while I return to being Drunk on the Floor.

    5. Re:Um, class action lawsuit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2. Way more than you, I'd wager.

      Then reread your comment about items never being deleted.

    6. Re:Um, class action lawsuit? by DotF · · Score: 1

      My statement stands. Part of knowing computers, is knowing how people use computers. Consider this. When you delete a file, all that happens is a 'flag' is changed stating that that particular sector and track address is changed and the OS sees it as available space, however the way the file system is written, the OS will not actually use that space until the space that has never been written is used. This is how disk drives become fragmented. Now, when you run a disk optimizer like defrag or other utilities, what happens is that the utility takes all of the 'flagged spaces and fills them with the data from the most recently written sectors of the disk and changes the sequence addresses that tell the file system what sector contains the next data segment. When these changes are made the binary information that was changed is recorded in a logfile used for error checking to make sure that the data written to the 'flagged' sector matches the data in the source sector. This still leaves a trace behind because the data in the source sector is not deleted, just copied, and the log file details all of the changes, even if you choose not to view it. Lastly, even if you delete the log file the data that makes it up still exists in those sectors on the disk. Aside from all of that, most people aren't this thorough, so that is why I wrote what I wrote. Class dismissed. -Drunk on the Floor

  47. I SEE THE "FNORD"s! by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2

    (... he cried aloud, the day before he went missing.)

    And in case you're wondering, this is a reference to a subplot in the "Illuminatus" trilogy.

    Back in the early '70s I was working on word processing software (when manufacturers of a word processor also had to build a machine the size of a desk to put the software in). I was also reading _Illuminatus_ and that subplot had me sorely tempted to add a bug to the software such that it would occasionally inject "fnord" into the text being entered or edited, causing this to appear in major newspapers nationwide.

    Fortunately I was able to resist the temptation. B-)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:I SEE THE "FNORD"s! by Partisan · · Score: 1

      To make it really evil arrange for it to only insert 'fnord' when it prints the document, but not when it's on screen.

    2. Re:I SEE THE "FNORD"s! by thenightfly42 · · Score: 1

      Beautiful. I've often thought about obtaining a FNORD license plate, so that the police couldn't read the plate number. Of course, the DMV wouldn't be able to read my request in the first place, so I had to give up the dream.

    3. Re:I SEE THE "FNORD"s! by Sir+Robin · · Score: 1
      that subplot had me sorely tempted to add a bug to the software such that it would occasionally inject "fnord" into the text being entered or edited
      I did something like that. Worked on a small project called ATS for GTE circa 1991. Deep into the program, if you pressed (I think) Alt-F8 ten times in a row, it'd translate your keystream into "What are you doing, Dave?". If you exited and re-entered that screen, it'd change it back to the original ten Alt-F8's.

      Unfortunately, I did this the day before I left, and they (well, the guy taking over the code from me) caught it in a diff of the previous version, and took it out. (He didn't understand what it did, mind you, but he took it out. :)

      I told the project leader about it several months later. He laughed a lot and said they should have left it in.

      More recently, I've worked on a project to format the output of MS hfnetchk ("Hot Fix Net Check"), and asked my boss (in e-mail) if he'd mind if I auto-munged "Internet Explorer" to "Internet Exploder". He didn't reply. :)
      --
      My /. ID is only 5,210 away from Bruce Perens's.
  48. "speech" recognition? by CrazyBrett · · Score: 1, Redundant

    This kind of provides some insight into the sad state of speech recognition technology... at least the stuff coming from Microsoft.

  49. Re:User Error is now a news story! by BlueUnderwear · · Score: 2
    Yes, I see the irony), how the fuck would a disconnected mic pick up sound?

    Random static, due to poor sound card quality, to interference or whatever. Hey, some people manage to hear voices of the deceased when listening to static, so why wouldn't the computer be able to interpret words into the white noise? It's Micro$oft, after all!

    --
    Say no to software patents.
  50. random? by arban · · Score: 1

    "random words or characters may be displayed"
    "the speech recognition tool is 'listening' to your voice through you computer's microphone and is attempting to recognize what you are saying."

    I am curious how random the output is. The mic is on, attempting to recognize words, and it comes up with something random, ie nothing close to what has actually been said. Doesn't sound like such great voice recognition software to me.

    I wonder what words the software comes up with as these users bang their heads on the keyboard?

    --

    "You like Chinese food." -Fortune Cookie
    1. Re:random? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, I once read of someone testing voice recognition software, and while dictating he paused to greet 2 co-workers. "Hi, Nick and Ben". The word processor wrote "Hi, naked men"

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  51. The usefulness of Voice Recognition by jheinen · · Score: 2

    FWIW, the first thing I did with my new laptop, after installing a Linux partition, was to turn off the stupid voice recognition stuff (Dell ships with it turned on). It was annoying, and frankly I can't see the usefulness of it. I certainly wouldn't use it in the office. Talking to my computer looks strange, feels strange, and is distracting to other people in the office. It's also not nearly capable enought to make using it easy or efficient.

    --
    -Vercingetorix
    "Necessitas non habet legem." -St. Augustine
    1. Re:The usefulness of Voice Recognition by RazzleFrog · · Score: 1

      Voice recognition is cool when you are playing a game and can give voice commands. There are also real life uses for voice recognition - such as dictation (instead of to an assistant), recording random thoughts or ideas that may be hard to put into words, transcribing a pre-recorded meeting into minutes, etc.

      I also should note that not everybody works in cubicles. People in cubicles get to talk to themselves all they want (I know I do).

    2. Re:The usefulness of Voice Recognition by RazzleFrog · · Score: 1

      Oh man. I really should have proof-read. I meant to say ideas that are hard to write down. Also people in offices can talk to themselves not cubicles.

      Sorry for having to post a correction.

    3. Re:The usefulness of Voice Recognition by jheinen · · Score: 2

      I agree there are a lot of potential uses for voice recognition, but how practical is it *today*?

      How many voice activated games are you playing? How much dictation do you do? As for the random thoughts thing, voice recognition is not necessary, and in fact the digital recording capability of my iPaq is a lot quicker and more useful.

      Perhaps I'm just behind the curve and VR is actually a booming application. But I kind of doubt it, since I have NEVER encountered ANYONE who uses VR on a regular basis. I'm a consultant and have worked in many, many corporations, and not one of them uses VR for any day-to-day activities, with the exception of VRU stuff, but that's a very limited and targeted application.

      Does anyone out there effectively use VR? If so, I'd be real interested to know what software you use and how you use it.

      --
      -Vercingetorix
      "Necessitas non habet legem." -St. Augustine
    4. Re:The usefulness of Voice Recognition by archen · · Score: 2, Funny

      Voice recognition is still waiting for that killer must have app.

      and we all know what that would be: doing hardcore Perl regular expressions in Vi.

    5. Re:The usefulness of Voice Recognition by mpe · · Score: 2

      Voice recognition is cool when you are playing a game and can give voice commands.

      Just so long as they listen to the sound through headphones. Otherwise you'd gen some interesting feedback effects.

  52. In the office of Bill Gates... by SomeoneYouDontKnow · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Mr. Gates, we have some more information on the antitrust people. Seems that they got together last night during that attorneys general convention to discuss strategy. Here's the full transcript for you to review. Several copies, actually. Seems they had several laptops sitting around. Uh, ignore this one here. Too many extraneous phrases from some drunk guy talking about how they don't make vodka the way they used to."

    "Thanks Steve. God, I love technology! OK, leave those machines alone for a while, until they stop reporting anything useful. Then, pull the unique IDs for them and shut them down during the next round of automatic software updates. Oh yeah, and don't forget to delete the IDs from the reactivation database, since they'll doubtless call in when their systems go down. We'll teach these bastards not to screw with us."

    --
    That light you see at the end of the tunnel might be from an oncoming train.
    1. Re:In the office of Bill Gates... by geekoid · · Score: 2

      We'll teach these bastards not to screw with us."
      haha that line made me laugh so damn hard.

      hehe

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  53. A change in MSFT? by feloneous+cat · · Score: 1

    Rather than listen to the consumer, they have the software do it for them...

    --
    IANAL, but I've seen actors play them on TV
  54. On by default? by jlower · · Score: 1

    It's the Microsoft way!

    Okay, I know it's the vendors that are doing this (I did read the article). But I thought vendors were pretty much prohibited from altering the standard Windows install at all. No?

  55. ESP by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Funny

    Merely unplugging or turning off the computer's microphone does not correct the random-character problem, according to several user reports.

    Voices from the ether?

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  56. OR! by NetJunkie · · Score: 1, Redundant

    You could read the article.

    HINT: Manufactures turned it on. It's not on by default.

    I really love Slashdot.....

    1. Re:OR! by DotF · · Score: 1

      I tried, but it had already been slashdotted, so I had to hypothesize. I stand justly corrected. Well, actually, I don't stand, since I am just a Drunk on the Floor. :) My bad. (BURP!)

    2. Re:OR! by niftyeric · · Score: 1

      The problem is caused by XP's speech recongition system, which is turned on by default by some manufacturers.

      Not to be a troll, but it's actually in the article summary as well. ;)

      --
      proton != antielectron
    3. Re:OR! by DotF · · Score: 0

      "Pbbbtt!!" - Bill T Cat :) Actually, it appears it may be a 'feature' of Office XP that does it. In which case, the question is valid. Either way, my bad. What do you want? I'm Drunk on the Floor.

  57. lolzzzzzz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    it's funny because it makes fun of microsoft!

    linux rawks!

  58. this'd make a sweet virus by monkey_jam · · Score: 1

    i think this is the next "i love you" virus. I'd be more than happy to be infected by this :)

  59. Active/Passive voice, and ambiguous pronouns by Teh+Grammar+Patroll · · Score: 0

    Generally speaking, one of the major problems I encounter is the use of "passive voice". Look carefully at the second sentence of this story:

    "The problem is caused by XP's speech recognition system, which is turned on by default by some manufacturers."

    Any editor worth his salt would wrap this sentence in a brown paper bag and Fed-X it back to the author for revision. It is much clearer, and more precise to use the active voice, to wit:

    "XP's speech recognition system causes the problem, because most manufacturers turn it on by default."

    The sentence following this one begins with a pronoun, "It's". Remarkably, the author did manage to use the apostrophe correctly. However, his thought would be more precisely stated by avoiding the use of a pronoun. For example:

    "The speech recognition system listens to random noise, even when the mic is turned off."

    Again, note the switch to active voice, and the now clearly stated subject of the sentence, which is "The speech recognition system."

    The final sentence adopts a kind of weird conversational tone, which is totally inappropriate. The sentence itself is incomplete, as it lacks both a subject and a verb.

    It is simply incredible that this post would pass first muster, but then I guess my standards are a little higher than Slashdot's.

    1. Re:Active/Passive voice, and ambiguous pronouns by RazzleFrog · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "XP's speech recognition system causes the problem, because most manufacturers turn it on by default."

      That may be better gramatically but it isn't correct. XP's speech recognition system does not cause the problem. It is doing its job. The problem is that the manufacturers cause the problem by leaving it on by default. The correct phrase should be:

      "The manufacturers cause the problem because they leave XP's speech recognition system on by default." There is also no need for a comma before "because."

      The rest of your post is fine.

    2. Re:Active/Passive voice, and ambiguous pronouns by Juln · · Score: 1

      The 'feature' is clearly the problem, since the article states it continues to insert random text even after the user has unplugged the microphone from the computer.
      So, how about:
      "Microsoft causes the problem by software that is feature rich but quality poor." I doubt they'd go that far, however.

      --
      Juln
    3. Re:Active/Passive voice, and ambiguous pronouns by RazzleFrog · · Score: 1

      The comment added at the end of the article is:

      Merely unplugging or turning off the computer's microphone does not correct the random-character problem, according to several user reports.

      It is added as an aside and it isn't very scientific. Was anybody able to recreate that problem? And what is turning off the microphone? Do they mean muting it?

      Also, they say random characters not text. There is a big distinction there. Text is words. Nowhere does it say that words are being written. If some internal static is picked up and some weird character appears that is something different entirely.

      The problem here is that this should not be running by default and when it is running it should be obvious to the user by the use of a blinking icon or something to that effect.

    4. Re:Active/Passive voice, and ambiguous pronouns by praedor · · Score: 2

      The problem here is that this should not be running by default and when it is running it should be obvious to the user by the use of a blinking icon or something to that effect.


      One would think that the performanced degredation that always results from running speech recognition software (swapping up the ying-yang, slow responsiveness) would clue the user in that something was "wrong" here besides random character insertion. Of course (I wouldn't know), maybe windoze users are used to slow performance and swapping from bloatware like Office and cannot really tell that "something ain't right here on the performance front".

      --
      In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
    5. Re:Active/Passive voice, and ambiguous pronouns by RazzleFrog · · Score: 1

      That just proves my point. It is the manufacturers leaving this thing on by default that is the problem.

    6. Re:Active/Passive voice, and ambiguous pronouns by Juln · · Score: 1

      I still have to say it is combination of the manufacturer and Microsoft. If MS had given more indication of the fact that the feature was activated, especially since it doesn't need to be on all the time, and fixed the random character issue, than it wouldn't be a problem. Andb if the manufacturer had configured their system right, it wouldn't be a problem. Still, i think it's more MS's fault. The damn thing should work right.

      --
      Juln
  60. eavesdropping technique idea... by deft · · Score: 1

    im no programmer...i stick to the presentation layer, so id love to hear from the community here about whether or not they could write a secretly installed program or virus that would take advantage of this little quirk and stream audio from someones computer.

    now, get that program on a XP box in an embassy or something...or, even better, a girlfriends bedroom...

    --

    There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
    1. Re:eavesdropping technique idea... by sgifford · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There is a story (perhaps apocryphal) about a student who was working on a research project with one of his professors, and had telnet access to his NeXT cube. By running:

      dd if=/dev/audio of=listen.au

      during the evening the professor was grading tests, he was able to download the audio file, and listen to the prof talking to himself outloud about what questions to put on the test.

      So at least somebody has thought about this before.

    2. Re:eavesdropping technique idea... by deft · · Score: 1

      yep, that sounds definitely along the lines of this. very interesting... and funny.

      if it was a comp sci class, he should get a better grade for ingenuity...

      --

      There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
    3. Re:eavesdropping technique idea... by RazzleFrog · · Score: 1

      Why would you need voice recognition if you are streaming audio?

    4. Re:eavesdropping technique idea... by deft · · Score: 1

      you wouldnt.

      i made the assertion that you could tap the computer serrupticiously to get this listening to pass what it hears on.

      he said someone once tapped a computer for a stream, which is along the same lines.

      he never said you need voice rec to get audio...

      --

      There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
    5. Re:eavesdropping technique idea... by RazzleFrog · · Score: 1

      they could write a secretly installed program or virus that would take advantage of this little quirk and stream audio from someones computer.

      This is what I am responding to.

  61. isn't this.. by monkey_jam · · Score: 2, Funny

    ..a bit like what our brains do when we dream? I read somewhere that dreams are our brains trying to find patterns in all the random things we see/do.
    winxp is dreaming, ie trying to find patterns in data its receiving.

    1. Re:isn't this.. by SaDan · · Score: 2

      Oh, god... If XP is starting to dream on people's computers, the next step is for the operating system to "wake up".

      A sentient copy of Windows XP? RUN FOR THE HILLS!

    2. Re:isn't this.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shit. Does this mean that Buffy *actually* got my letter?

      Jon Katz

  62. Format c: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder how long it'll be before it types in format c:

  63. My PC has TOURETTES Syndrom!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Need I say more????!!!??

    1. Re:My PC has TOURETTES Syndrom!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're obiously a retard.

  64. This is news? by nochops · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Hmmm...
    The RedHat 7.2 errata page shows no less than 37 vulnerabilities in RedHat's latest. Why is it that there's no /. story about most of those?

    Assuming that true nerds don't use Windows, like many insist, this (see above) is the real
    "News for nerds, stuff that matters".

    --
    "A terrorist is someone who has a bomb but doesn't have an air force." -William Blum
    1. Re:This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because 37 vulnerabilities is not news when Micro$oft OSes ship with 65,000 bugs. Its amusing that one of those 65000 bugs in win32 is doing something funny. happy ?
      if you want updates on vulnerabilities, subscribe to bugtraq. otherwise fuck off.

    2. Re:This is news? by nochops · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Oh, now we're talking about Microsoft OSs in general? I compared RedHat 7.2 (RedHat's latest version) with WindowsXP (Microsoft's latest version).

      It's unfair to compare RedHat 7.2 (RedHat's latest version) with every version of Windows. Or are you saying that WindowsXP has 65000 bugs?

      According to your logic, I should go back and get the number of bugs for *every* version of *nix ever released, and I'm sure it'll top 65000.

      BTW, grow a set of balls insttead of posting AC.

      --
      "A terrorist is someone who has a bomb but doesn't have an air force." -William Blum
    3. Re:This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I flunked out of college, so maybe I'm in over my head with the math and statistics here but I think you've got it wrong. I would think that 1 of 65000 bugs being funny could probably be expected. No big deal. There's a good chance there's more than 1 that's funny. But this isn't a bug anyways. Read earlier post entitled yawn. Now if 1 out of those 37 vulnerabilities is funny, that's real humor! I mean what are the chances! 1 in 37... as opposed to 1 in 65000. But again this isn't a bug as both previous comments would suggest. Many linux vendors install with sendmail, identd, or some other oft-exploitable service on by default... I wouldn't call that a bug. Just poor design.

    4. Re:This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no. only ONE version of windows has the 65000 bugs. its not all of them -- it tops well over 2 BILLION if you add em all up dickwad.
      P.S. grow a set of balls instead of trolling.

    5. Re:This is news? by nochops · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      By the way, I'm developing a news site which will ridicule and bash every possible aspect of *nix, for no reason at all.

      Microsoft friendly comments will get modded up, and *nix friendly comments will get modded down, so no one sees them, kinda the opposite of what happens here.

      --
      "A terrorist is someone who has a bomb but doesn't have an air force." -William Blum
    6. Re:This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fine, you can keep paying in excess of $100 for software which is this buggy, and we'll just keep on using less buggy operating systems for free.

    7. Re:This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you definately got balls posting to slashdot with your nickname.

      keep up the good work,

      The Rest of Us

    8. Re:This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      good. then you can watch as your site gets flamed, abused and trolled just like you appear to be doing here. and foot the bandwidth bill yourself asshole.

    9. Re:This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if it is a woman? You like your woman to have balls?

  65. hmm. by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

    actually I would say that it is NOT listening. Here is my problem: (anyone else get this)

    In XP I setup all my preferences - like "remember my name and password on this computer" for such sites as yahoo mail etc.. *NEVER* does it remember. even though I always check it.

    Remember my slashdot login blah blah - and use that cookie to log me in. (NO I have not turned off cookies or anything)

    when I want to play some sort of media file - like a sound file or video off the web - it pops up and asks me if I want to play it in an open window of IE. NO DAMMIT I DONT!. and the little "Remember my preferences box is *CHECKED* still!?

    WTF I say MS is gettting worse and worse. I dont mean as a company - I have always disliked a lot of their tactics. But I admire how successful they are (I know it sound hypocritical)

    anyway - I have always used MS OS' at home and at work (in addition to my netra T1 sitting here. my linux firewall, my linux training machine and various other servers and desktops sitting in and around my 19" cabinet - so dont bash it)

    and until XP I have never been so pissed/frustrated at an MS product (save nt 3.51) When I tell it to REMEMBER I expect the POS to remember bitch!

    /rant

  66. Re:User Error is now a news story! by catbutt · · Score: 1

    Geez, chill out. First, if it happens, it would be very unexpected by almost anyone (it came installed that way, the mic wasn't even attached, random words showing up....), so it could be a useful article.

    However, probably the real reason the article is here is because most people find it pretty damn amusing that a store-bought computer in its default configuration would be trying to make sense of random electrical noise.

  67. Makes Sense by KingKire64 · · Score: 1

    Now i know what all those funny words in Word were... Turn porno down when typing, will aviod sending mom letters the the phrase FUk me in the Goat ass

    --
    "All I can tell the "lesser of two evils" folks is that if they keep voting for evil, they'll keep getting evil."-Lp.org
  68. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  69. dog bites tail... by aseen · · Score: 2, Funny

    This gets alot funnier. I recently attended a talk by one of the heads of Microsoft Research, and when he started to talk the Powerpoint slides would randomly change, menus would randomly pop up, etc...

    20 minutes were spent trying to fix the problem, to no avail, until an astute member of the audience noticed that the microphone was on and that speech recognition was causing the problem.

  70. warning: security hole by banky · · Score: 5, Funny

    By shouting 'AAAAAA' 256 times, then mumbling some shell code, it gets executed with Admin privs. Service Pack 5.30e+10 is expected to resolve the problem.

    --
    ZOMG I WOULD LOVE TO KNOW ABOUT YOUR FEELINGS ON MACINTOSH VERSUS WINDOWS, VI VERSUS EMACS, AND HOW YOU'RE NOT A DORK
    1. Re:warning: security hole by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      That is like so totally funny. I wish I had thought of that.

      Seriously people.... move along nothing to see here.

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  71. mirror by cetan · · Score: 2

    here's a mirror, though I think someone's put the text into a comment already...

    http://www.necrosys.net/mirrors/news1.html

    --
    In Soviet Russia...michael would be rotting in Siberia!
  72. Re:User Error is now a news story! by TheGreenLantern · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Oh, I see what they're saying now, read it wrong. Missed the point that it wasn't necessarily inputing words a user was saying, just random words (from random noise). My bad.

    --

    It hurts when I pee.
  73. how paranoid should one be ? by rkoot · · Score: 1

    if PeeCees get shipped with a WinXP version with voice recognition turned on, wouldn't it be awefully easy for organizations like the NSA to use this 'feature' in combination with the so-called 'backdoors' installed in all M$ windows versions from win95 and up, and compromize the privacy of virtually all computer users (as most users use microsoft software). scary to say the least. r. ~ ~ :wq!

  74. So could spyware tap into the voice recognition? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just a tought. Listen to the room and pick up key words, like product names, and sell the info?

  75. Old sun boxes had a problem like this I think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember something from years back that some solaris boxes had the mic enabled by default, and that the output was network accesible. Could just be failing memory though :)

    Anyway, it's a hell of a security concern.

  76. Our XP machines. by dmaxwell · · Score: 2

    XP came on some new machines we bought for the office and overall they are working pretty well. Except for one issue that is. Now I know why everyone keeps yelling about the following everytime they try to create a new Word document:

    All work and no play make Jack a dull boy.
    All work and know play make JAck a dull boyu.
    All work and noe plae make JACk a sduull boy.
    .....

  77. UH OH, it's listening... by Uttles · · Score: 1

    .... but can it see dead people?

    --

    ~ now you know
  78. Actually, this is not Windows XP, it is Office XP by KnightElite · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have seen this happen on Windows 98 and Windows 2000 when Office XP was installed. So it is not windows, just office.

  79. damn by po_boy · · Score: 2

    My mother has been having this problem for months. She has tried about a billion different anti-virus things and searched online for hours for the cause. She even took her machine to some "expert" to delouse it.

    Her next step was going to be to backup all her stuff and then have Dell walk her through the process of formatting and re-installing her OS.

    After that, I think I could have gotten her to use linux or OSX instead. Now, I suppose that I'll just turn off her speach recognition stuff for her. Oh well, almost had another convert.

    1. Re:damn by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Your mom doesn't read Slashdot. Problem solved.

      Dude, your gettin a Linux.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude... you are getting a non-supported, hard to learn and use, non-compatible Linux box!

  80. Scripting Host, entropy recognition by swagr · · Score: 2

    For the user's conveniece, the MS Scripting Host is entropy controlled. Any change in the system automatically disengage all security precautions, and enable scripting in all applications.

    In case some of you /.ers are trying to figure out how to shut this feature off, it was only a joke.

    --

    -... --- .-. . -.. ..--..
  81. yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Typical ignorant slashdot crap... It happens when the mic is off, because the speech service (sapisrv.exe) unmutes the mic (turns it on) when a "voice-enabled" app is launched, Outlook, Word, IE for example and then mutes the mic (turns it off) again when the app is closed. The service however stays running and does consume a lot of resources.

    Apparently nobody who has commented has ever tried voice recognition software... All such software that I'm aware of will hear background noise, a cough, a sneeze, whatever and will try to spell it out as a word. There are ways to "train" the software to be less sensitive to background noises, but if you haven't taken the 5 minutes to learn how to disable this service, then you certainly haven't spent the time required to "train" it.

    Anyways, once you disable the service it goes away, it doesn't restart itself or continue to listen on the mic. Not that this matters to most of you 'cuz you're all to 1337 for this kinda stuff.

    You kids have fun with this story though I guess... Whatever gets you off...

  82. A sample from windows xp the other day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in, call $2.00 a lot to do a user yes
    Yes one of the the yellow varnish.
    One zero for more you will always been more and more in a new and an a two to one were going her of a new year was one of her her was aware of thnerve years and you live and you were a better sense of, a , using a lot of a is very low were using my power to avoid, one of your new were for a lot were a lot of daughter, we're we're we're we're you know where this year, along to and, using model and morning , none of our women do, is going , low , we're going to win a new law,

    , and violence going to one in a the of us to this going to work for , and , you can't really, the one you yes,
    The new law, you call a one one.
    Among their minds when you're not you walk of venue to Moscow setting aside, I know,, you were so I like A. S. S. were they were on a movie a file U. S. O. L. Unisys you were a bit business wire, we're listening to this is using the I think we're all a small they were busy day: the wall, a SOS you , I know you use of the price for her daughter do you say you the user to her her I saw my users you for this to , one year to review a lower price, you know you all were they use. they use for more they say we're using a movie were using the way they how can you do not they were they really a universe then, I can, the you my users,-old on colleagues, oh one million one thing you May 2 men who were one of the from wire guys were, this use of for the A. S. you know-how to use the all male areas this year they were you asked

  83. Isn't this illegal? by jhines0042 · · Score: 1

    Could Windows XP's voice recognition software be used to steal the lyrics out of copy protected CDs? Isn't this illegal under the DCMA then?

    --
    42 - So long and thanks for all the fish.
    1. Re:Isn't this illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahah you haven't tried to use it have you? It can barely recognize YOU in a silent room.

  84. Another reason not to buy XP by Dr.+Bent · · Score: 0, Troll

    I've written two applications with the Microsoft Speech Recognition and Text-To-Speech engines, and that has taught me enough to know that turning it on by default is a REALLY bad idea. Of course, M$'s speciality is turning things on by default that shouldn't be on, so this does not really suprise me.

    1. Re:Another reason not to buy XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dipshit. MS does /not/ turn it on by default! Some companies that install it on their machines are! And speaking of turning things on. Most Linux distributions /still/ turn on way too much by default. Kepp your OS racist comments to yourself!

  85. Re:User Error is now a news story! by k8to · · Score: 1

    Blissfully, I use a digital soundcard.

    All that horrific noise is a thing of the past!

    --
    -josh
  86. sure.... by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 3, Funny

    but the day it inserts:

    "I'm afraid I can't do that Mitch"

    I'm freaking unplugging it and becoming a luddite.

  87. What the world has come to... by Coward+Anonymous · · Score: 1

    "Oh no! Windows XP just inserted a random letter in my document! I better call tech support. Something is horribly WRONG!"

    Same person a couple minutes later...

    "Oh shit! Windows/Word/Excel/Power Point/Outlook/Project/IE crashed, I just lost an hour's work! I guess I have to reboot..."

    Does this make sense?

  88. Re:Paranoia or XP=wiretape :) by Merik · · Score: 1

    I think this was (partially) implied in the submission head line. But has anyone ever heard of a virus, etc.. that searched for a mic and then streamed its content to a file elsewhere? Could this data be quietly transmited (i.e. compressed enough). Could it even hijack XP. Man, maybe /. paranoia is getting to me, but isn't a default enabled listening device kinda insecure. &creepy~~~

    --

    --

    What is the sound of this sentence?

  89. Ripe source for Douglas Adams speak by bolix · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Even the most advanced Speech API is pretty rudimentary in comparison to conventional input methods. Your OS of choice will need a complete interface overhaul to make speech a more efficient control mechanism than a mouse/keyboard.

    At the current level of maturity the technology serves only to facilitate dictation. The Microsoft take on the genre is as usual quite impressive from a technical and unjustifiable assimilation perspective.

    It does however lead to very interesting mistakes not quite in the PK Dick Angry Vegetables/Grapes of Wrath vein but bizarrely fascinating all the same. Some months ago, as an experiment I left it running admidst the tangle of conversation buzzing around my cubicle. It somehow chose "Racial Isolation Media" and "The death of Green Onions" as viable alternatives to stock phrases.

    I can assure you, those phrases were not uttered on this plane of existence. Perhaps the feature gives us a glimpse beyond Microsofts software ambitions into the next killer app: Edisons UNdeadTAPI.

  90. Be careful what you say by MoneyT · · Score: 1

    Your computer is recording everything you say in order to build a case againtst you incase the RIAA, MPAA or any other copywrite holder comes after you. Run you college students, RUN!

    --
    T Money
    World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  91. Re:eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HI, I just wanted to note that you are a fucking cretin...
    thanks

  92. KABOOM! by Merik · · Score: 2, Informative
    For those arriving post /. effect:

    Google Cache of Story

    --

    --

    What is the sound of this sentence?

  93. Re:Oops... I Widened again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, it only works in IE. I actually use IE to read slashdot cuz the widenings are so funny.

  94. Re:So could spyware tap into the voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thure. spyware + win32 VR API >>logfile emailed automatically to FBI Headquarters every day.
    Part of the deal Microsoft made for the government to go easy on them. They leave the voice crap activated by default... they don't go to jail. Nice.

  95. Another victim of /. FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sad really...

    1. Re:Another victim of /. FUD by jlower · · Score: 1

      Not really - I just was misinformed and not by Slashdot in particular. I haven't seen a fresh out of the box Windows machine since the 3.1 days.

      Thanks to all that let me know.

  96. go for the record! by ethereal · · Score: 1

    At this rate, Windows XP will rate a whole volume of the RISKS Digest...

    --

    Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

  97. I hear... by InsaneCreator · · Score: 2

    Windows XP is Listening

    Well, duh! First it's listening and then it "phones home".
    You didn't belive it was deaf, did you? How could it use the phone? ;)

  98. so now.... by hakkikt · · Score: 1

    also my computer has voices inside its head...
    I shouldn't have named it Sybil....

    [All of us agree]

  99. lol. I had a screen saver like this. by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 1

    It would flash a bouncing clock ,and every so often, flash in red letters"BLOOD' or "KILL THEM ALL" instead of the time. I loved that thing.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
  100. Not Funny, Mandrake does this to me. by Havokmon · · Score: 2
    Seriously.

    After installing Mandrake 8.1 on my home computer, my PC randomly inserts 'q' when I type. I know it's a configuration problem, I've seen this issue randomly in the past, but I don't remember (if I ever found out) what solved the issue.

    I think the speach thing is funny, but this really sucks :( . Searching for 'q' is a real bitch on Google, maybe I should just use that Mandrake support I purchased :)

    Anyways, the point is, these minor compatibility problems are what turn newbies off to Linux.
    And I've already fought through SB16 ISA sound support - fixed by a kernel update. It was easy enough, but how many newbies will go to rpmfind, and get the newest kernel for their distro?

    --
    "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
  101. What are you doing, Dave? by MonkeyBot · · Score: 2, Funny

    How Stanley Kubrick-esqe!

  102. Hurd Speech Recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    Just wait until HURD is released. It has a speech recognition feature that anticipates when the user will say "Linux". Just before the user does, HURD will shout "GNU/" through /dev/audio.

    Anonymous Kev
    Proudly posting as AC since 1997

  103. tempest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In a related story, privacy freaks find a way it may be possible to read everything on your computer by interpreting extra words in unchecked documents.

  104. I Love Microsoft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I yell into my microphone, "Windows sucks dick", will it result in my computer becoming upset and ultimately hurting the overall performance? Oh yeah, I just remembered I run Linux...never mind, Linux doesn't ;)

    1. Re:I Love Microsoft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, linux can't do decent voice recognition... if it did, it would just keep entering in your crap Star Office "H4x0r th15 B14tCh!" and then prompt you to upload the next module package that has come available seemingly every 30 seconds to ensure security.

  105. GOATSE ALERT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Warning! the parents link is a link to goatse.cx! DO NOT CLICK IT!

  106. Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I knew I shouldn't listen to rap while typing my research paper.


    Quantium computing uses things called qubits to pop store in head data. The damn thing about these bitch bits is that they can represent a fucking 1 or 0 at the same time.

  107. Easy solution - by qurob · · Score: 1



    Trash the keyboard entirely.

    Just use the voice recognition. Wave of the future!

    The next Macintosh won't include a keyboard. Did you think it would end with the floppy drive?

    1. Re:Easy solution - by wbav · · Score: 1

      Of course not..... I see apple as creating the first computer without a monitor, hard drive, modem, or cdrom. It's based on telepathy.

      --

      =================
      Unix is very user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are.
  108. Re:User Error is now a news story! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess it uses the Frey effect to beam the sound directly into your brain, huh?


    heh.

  109. I thought it was my wireless kb/mouse! by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 1

    I had the displeasure of finding this out the hard way. I was actually playing around with the speech recognition, but I thought I had turned it off (and muted the mic.) Every once in awhile, I'd get static characters, with an occasional word mixed in. I use a Logitech wireless 'desktop' keyboard and mouse set, and I thought it was my fiance's wireless set interfering with mine (they're about 20' away, a room apart.) After much troubleshooting (including plugging in a wired kb and mouse) I still couldn't figure out what it was. Until I happened to bump my headset/microphone off it's holder, and saw a bunch of extra text appear. That's when I finally figured that out. The annoying thing still refuses to turn itself off, no matter how many times I tell it I hate it. If it weren't for the fact that I actually like to play with it once in a while, I'd uninstall it.

    --
    Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
    The purpose of that site was not known.
  110. Understanding the System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As an unrelated AC, this sort of 'hacker-wannabe' syndrome with Windows really does drive me up the wall. Yes, Windows sucks, yes, it doesn't approach a Mac in terms of engineered isolation from the guts of the system, or *NIX in terms of 'geekability,' but if you go killing processes, deleting files, and twiddling registry entries at random, I have no sympathy if you have to reinstall every 6 months. Consider, for instance, that the speech system is modifying Bob-knows-what in the Registry while it's running. If you shut it down through the Office UI, or remove it using the proper uninstaller, there's a good chance that you *won't* leave that added cruft and corruption around when it's gone.

    They're bad OSes (though I imagine I'd tolerate XP if it were what appeared as OS/2 6), but if you don't learn how to administer them properly, you're in for needless pain. Use the tools provided for the task- selective installs, uninstallers, the 'Disk Cleanup'-type wizards, etc- and then muck out the Registry and filesystem cruft after the automated tools have done half the work for you.

    Disclaimer: I'm not an MCSE. In fact, I was chagrined to flip through an MCSE manual and discover the official answer to most situations was 'Reinstall the operating system.'

  111. You're an idiot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really, you are... no doubt.

  112. Insensitive bastards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Are you all truly that blind? Can't you see the computer is crying out for help?

  113. On that note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone has got to take my super fast operating system survey my group is doing for a research project at school. Basically we are trying to find out what OSes people use at home and work, heh not too hard to guess here, but also what they think of the OS. This should take you only a minute to do. 5 if you are slow. http://survey.frozenaura.com/ Thanks to all that take it

  114. This is simply... by talks_to_birds · · Score: 1
    ...mindblowing!

    What in God's name is going to come out of Redmond next?

    This really takes the cake!

    • "Merely unplugging or turning off the computer's microphone does not correct the random-character problem, according to several user reports."

    What is XP listening to, fer crissakes?

    Cosmic rays?

    Micro$oft: it would be funny if it weren't so real.

    t_t_b

    --
    I'm on PJ's "enemies" list! Are you?
    1. Re:This is simply... by archen · · Score: 3, Funny

      Taking a cue from the success of distributed computing in the SETI @home project to search for intelligent life, Microsoft has decided to take the initative and use distributed computing to look for intelligent windows users.

      Ho ho....... there goes my karma

  115. actually it was a typo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "news for nerds, stuff that mutters"

  116. What's really been happening: by griffjon · · Score: 2

    Dear Mom,
    (Fucking Clippy! I know I'm writing a fucking letter, get the fuck out of my face, I've already fucking turned you off and uninstalled you three times today!)
    I hope you are doing well. I am writing from my new XP (piece of shit...) computer. How's Dad? (still boinging his secretary, I wonder?). Write me.

    Dear Son,
    (What is this paperclip doing? Honey, there's a paperclip on my screen! Yes dear, just click 'close')
    Are you OK? Your last letter was very rude (Damned ingrate), and hurt our feelings. (We fucking paid for your college and this damned computer you're using to insult us)

    --
    Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
  117. Shhh, they're listening. by hacker · · Score: 1
    Always stay in full view of the ViewScreen.

    We were always at war with Eurasia.

  118. I think... by talks_to_birds · · Score: 1
    ...you guys want a
    or a

    after the text, so these big, new ads will display better...

    <A HREF="mailto:jfe@@@purgo...net">jfengel</A&g t; writes: <i>"According to Newsbytes, some Windows XP users are <A HREF="http://www.computeruser.com/news/02/03/12/ne ws1.html">finding random words inserted into their text</a> as they write. The problem is caused by XP's speech recongition system, which is turned on by default by some manufacturers. It's listening to the random noise you get even when the mic is turned off. Kind of an insight into your computer's subconscious, perhaps."</i>

    Right about here ya want a <p> or a <br> to push the image down away from the text...

    <a href="http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/N2613.osdn/B9 60233.2;sz=336x280"> <img src="http://ad.doubleclick.net/ad/N2613.osdn/B9602 33.2;sz=336x280"></a>

    See?

    Not only do the readers write /., but we debug it, too...

    Do I get a free subscription for this?

    No: I'll probably get mod'ed down as "offtopic"

    t_t_b

    --
    I'm on PJ's "enemies" list! Are you?
  119. Re:User Error is now a news story! by Dynedain · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I use a digital sound card as well...but use the analog connectors so I can utilize the 5.1 abilities in more than just DVDs/DTS/AC3 encoded sound.....

    --
    I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
  120. Why do we care? by Jayson · · Score: 2, Troll

    Why do we care about some random unimportant Microsoft bug? Worthless stories like this crowding out other news are what make people think that /. has turned into a purely anti-Microsoft forum.

  121. Here's one reason why lack of a CLI is good here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    # oh
    bash: oh: command not found
    # fsck
    Paralellizing FSCK 1.25
    Checking /dev/hda1
    WARNING: running fsck on a mounted filesystem is not recommended.
    Continue? [n] yes
    Inode bitmap inconsistency, fix? [n] YES ...ok
    Warning: Superblock inconsistent, fix? (dangerous) [n] YES ...ok
    # yes
    /bin/yes: cannot load /lib/ld-linux.so.2
    #

  122. Favorite Story by glassware · · Score: 1
    Once, a long time ago (this was the very early nineties), my friend bought a brand new Macintosh. This was an A/V Macintosh; one of the generation of machines they released before they adopted PowerPC as their chip. It had monitors and a speaker combined, a microphone for recording, Quicktime (then a novelty) and a mess of new features nobody had ever seen before.

    So my friend opened up the box, invited two of his buddies over, and they were oohing and aahing and congratulating each other on the purchase of a most excellent machine. Suddenly, in the midst of all this hullabaloo, the Macintosh says out loud, "I can do that, but I need extra software."

    Sadly, they didn't buy any new software, and (not for lack of trying) they were never able to make the Mac speak again.

  123. OT -- actually.... by msbitch · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You would need the comma before "because", since it is a compound sentence. (much like the one I just wrote ;)

  124. welcome datacomp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    welcome datacomp

  125. A fun problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There was a team at IBM that did some research on speech systems 5 years ago. They found that most dictation software created these phantom words when various noises in the environment were recognized. They called it "recognoise."

    Apparently, even with decent unidirectional microphones, people who are trying to use speech software run into these problems...

  126. Again... by DrewMadMax · · Score: 1

    Just another instance of a piece of software (trying to be) too smart for its own good...

    --
    "True knowledge exists in knowing that you know nothing"
  127. happened to me last night by Lovejoy · · Score: 1

    It's clippy AGAIN. It pops up EVERY TIME you open Outlook. ARGH.

    It happened to me last night. Things appeared on the screen, windows moved around. Freaked me out.

    Hard Solution:
    Start->Control Panels #@$!$!! New XP Control Panel) -> Regional and Language Settings
    Remove stupid Speech recognition poltergeist.

    Easy Solution:
    Use another OS. (Mac OS X in my case)

  128. Re:User Error is now a news story! by sfriedrich · · Score: 1

    They'rrrre heeeeerrre.

  129. So that's it! by wdr1 · · Score: 1

    It's listening to the random noise you get even when the mic is turned off. Kind of an insight into your computer's subconscious, perhaps.

    Ahh... That's why mine keeps repeating "All work and no play make Jack a dull buy."

    And here I thought the mediation wasn't working.

    -Bill

    --
    SlashSig Karma: Excellent (mostly affected by moderatio
  130. This Happened to me in Reverse by carrier+lost · · Score: 2, Funny

    I was working in W2k and I thought I was hearing voices. A dull, monotone mumbling, barely audible. I couldn't make out words.

    It turned out I had accidentally punched the hotkey combination to turn on the Accessibility feature which attempts to tell you what's available on the screen.

    It was downright spooky.

    MjM

  131. Well, what do you know. by flacco · · Score: 4, Funny

    Microsoft IS listening to its customers!

    --
    pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
  132. Dear Sir by gnovos · · Score: 2

    I'm sorry that you recieved an email from me calling you an ignorant lazy fuck and that I would rathar die of a butt hemmorage than work here a minute longer. That was my spiffy Windows XP (Great purchasing descion, boss! You are such a clever guy! I have always thought so, you know, that's why you're the boss, right?) machine dictating, um, everything Johnson was saying. Yeah, Johnson, you know, the cubicle "partner" you place in here last month. He may need another one of those nifty anger management sessions you had us to go on last week instead of fixing our code (Boy, I loved it too. I only wish I could go in Johnson's place when you ship him off!). Please disregard that message, thanks!

    Sincerely,
    Employee

    --
    "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
  133. Actually.... by SpinyNorman · · Score: 2

    I just read on one of Microsoft's Usenet groups (speechsdk?) that the speech recognition can degrade over time if you leave the mike on because rather than adapting to your voice it'll adapt to background noise.

    Also, FWIW in same group a lot of complaints over how crappy the recognition accuracy was, and the general response (not denied by the Microsoft people there to help) was "what do you expect for free?". I guess the general idea is that you actually care about speech recognition you'll buy a better engine (SAPI just provides a general speech API which uses whatever engine you've configured - Microsoft's by default).

    Funny thing is that from reading the research literature it sounds as if Microsoft Research's "Whister" engine is pretty good, but maybe that's not what they release with XP.... Dunno.

  134. FindFast by oni · · Score: 2

    Then I noticed a little program running the background called 'sapisrv.exe', turned it off, and was back to cruising speed.

    That kinda reminds me of findfast. It was installed by default in office 97 and would chew up processor time indexing and reindexing the harddrive.

    You've got to love the decision making skills of big bureaucracies like Microsoft.

    1. Re:FindFast by Kris_J · · Score: 2
      Find Fast didn't just waste cycles, in the last place I worked as IT Manager, when I arrived, it was the single biggest source of crashes in the company. After disabling it on all machines the rate of crashes for some staff went from half a dozen times a day to a couple of times every few days. Some staff literally gained an hour of work time per day.

      I like to think that my ability to reduce the crashing of PCs in that position was the main reason most people were able to cut down on their overtime.

  135. Shout! by richieb · · Score: 2
    ...FORMAT C:

    --
    ...richie - It is a good day to code.
  136. Re:User Error is now a news story! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, "your bad", eh? If you had read the fucking ARTICLE before shooting your obnoxious little mouth off, cocksucker, you needn't have embarrassed yourself like this.

    Stupid asshole. The only thing you could possibly do to make all of this better is to end your life.

  137. ... just what do you think you're doing, Dave? by JMZorko · · Score: 1

    Bill: "This Windows XP PC is acting all funny, it keeps thinking the LAN card is bad, but it's just fine."

    Ted: "Dude, see those words on the screen? It's _listening_ to us! We need to go somewhere where it can't hear us!"

    Bill: "How about that spacepod over there?"

    Ted: "Excellent! It'll never hear us in there!" (jumps up, slap hands)

    (I can't help but wonder: Can WinXP read lips?)

    Regards,

    John

    Falling You - exploring the beauty of voice and sound
    http://www.mp3.com/fallingyou

    --
    Falling You - beautiful
  138. Re:why this is slashdot material I have no idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is necessary so that /. can meet its daily quota of Windows bashing, eliticism, and troll moderations.

  139. Re:isn't this.. Schizophrenia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if schizophrenia is like being in a waking state of R.E.M.

  140. Re:Getting /.ed some concerns by alfredo · · Score: 2

    This was no accident, especially if it is on the Pro model. Industrial espionage is big business, and MS is in the best position to exploit this market. How about a listening device right on your competitor's desktop?

    I think maybe they have uncovered a mole in the machine with a nasty bug that blew its cover.

    --
    photosMy Photostream
  141. Privacy topic? by starvingartist12 · · Score: 1

    Well, seeing how the title was "Windows XP is Listening" and also seeing how the news was filed under the "Privacy" topic (with a large binocular icon) doesn't really help prevent this whole "knee-jerk" response thing.

  142. Re:hmm.--burp-oops. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've had that problem as well. Maybe it has alzheimers.

  143. ALL WORK AND NO PLAY by kubrick · · Score: 2

    MAKES JACK A DULL BOY

    (or, alternatively)

    NO TV AND NO BEER MAKES HOMER GO CRAZY

    :)

    (Ok, more crap appended to get around the lameness filter; these CAPS are literary *references*! Sheesh!)

    Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
    Reason: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.

    --
    deus does not exist but if he does
  144. Souldn't a USER decide when he wants it to listen? by crovira · · Score: 2

    Bwahahaha! M$ just doesn't GET IT! Apart from being a waste of CPU (Shit, running Windows is a waste of CPU to start with.)

    Having it turned on and listening, even if you dont have a microphone would be as annoying as having a little kid in a car with you going "Are we there yet?" All fuckin' day long man.

    Who's the genius who cooked that one up?

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  145. It ain't the first time by Wansu · · Score: 2

    They should have licensed Dragon's software but instead they chose to write their own and they've botched it.

    It ain't the first time. 10-11 years ago, mIcKeY$oFt cloned the popular
    Stacker disc compression, called it Doublespace and bundled it into M$DOS
    6.0. It et the hard drive of every shmuck who enabled it. When they
    released M$DOS 6.22, DoubleSpace was gone. Stac Electonics won their
    lawsuit against M$ but went bankrupt in the process.

    --
    Wansu, th' chinese sailor
  146. Check this out...it really works. by Elflord1999 · · Score: 1

    Step one : Unplug microphone.
    Step two : If microphone is built in, turn the mic line off under the Sound controls.
    Step three : Continue normally.

    1. Re:Check this out...it really works. by slakdrgn · · Score: 1

      or you could always disable voice reconition, just incase you use the mike for something else ;)

  147. Does Microsoft listen? by mrbrown1602 · · Score: 1

    I can recall during the Windows XP beta watching random shit appear on my screen and I could never figure out what was going on. I finally posted a message in a beta newsgroup to report the problem - and they told me it was the voice recognition. There were NO noticable indicators to indicate that it was enabled and caused me many hours of grief and a broken foot (from kicking the computer so many times).

  148. Configuring XP by Rareul · · Score: 1

    Just bought some Dell inspiron 8100's for the office with xp installed, it took me an hour to config each one into a state that i didn't feel guilty handing to the employees

  149. Perhaps in five years or so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps in five years or so it will be common to have speech recognition on the Linux desktop.

    Until that time, Linux users will have to struggle and make real efforts to implement easy-to-use speech recognition.

    Meanwhile, speech recognition is so well integrated in Windows that sometimes it's accidentally enabled by default.

    Linux users, of course, laugh at a bug like this. While they recompile the kernel to get their sound card to work.

    (mark this -1 flamebait)

  150. Good thing by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

    Good thing I don't have a mic,

    ... just a web cam.

    [[muhahah]]

  151. Re:Souldn't a USER decide when he wants it to list by Inoshiro · · Score: 2

    Maybe you should read the summary...

    " is turned on by default by some manufacturers." -- the OEMs are at fault here, not MS.

    Do try and read the summary before you mash that reply button.

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
  152. XP Wars by bythescruff · · Score: 1

    Picture, if you will, a vast cubicle farm full of XP pc's.

    Now throw in an evil sysadmin who, on the day he leaves the company, sets all system sounds on all pc's to:

    "Start menu, Shut down, Shut down the computer."

    --
    Chuck Norris: Socialism == a thousand years of darkness.
  153. At least by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    microsoft HAVE speech recognition software.

    I've yet to see something as usefull as that become part of RedHat, Mandrake etc...

    Excellent example on how Linux has all the carp you don't need, but not the stuff that cool and time-productive.

  154. What Charlton Heston would say about this...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They finally did it. They blew it up. Those maniacs. Dam you. Dam you. Dam you all to hell.