Look man, we are trying to boil it down to a mostly unimportant single number and then declare which is better! Your absurd idea of a series of difficult and useful comparisons is just plain crazy-talk.
As someone who has lived for a long time in several non-English speaking countries, I can tell you that many don't bother to learn much of it after arriving, either. It's baffling.
"It's not as much fun" is a pretty tepid argument against self-driving cars. "Of course they'll be better in every other way. But think of the fun!" Just as there are places you can go ride horses today, there will be places where you can go drive a car.
despite the fact he almost certainly has never heard of it before or had any reason to think it was faked.
So then your notion is that it's perfectly reasonable to believe that a World Cup will suddenly be held starting the very next day. Are the teams frantically packing their bags and rushing to the airport in order to make the opening kickoff?
Basically, you're saying humans should be more rational than we are. But we're not. We could barely form civilization, and it's not yet clear that we can maintain it.
Years ago Volvo invented and patented the three-point seat belt. But they found it to be such a boon to safety that they gave it away without royalties. Today, "pedestrian detection" costs extra?
We know that your average principal has to check the school policy manual to figure out which leg to put in the trouser first. And then they mess it up half the time anyway.
It might be as much as 3/4, as they also have to get the front/back oriented.
the end user wouldn't notice or care about the electrical cost increase of 1-2 dollars a month. What they will notice is a subsidized or free device that can do things that other devices cannot do.
If it's possible to offer some compelling new service for 1-2 dollars per month, why not just charge that directly, instead of the Rube Goldberg method?
Oh stewardess, I speak racist. He said: Such a group of people I despise. The powers that be want the people to view any incident not in terms of the individual, but rather that person's group, as it is easier to control by group or type rather than many separate and rational individuals.
Slashdot Mirror
Here's a good rundown of the story.
And if you do test your code, you still don't know. But you'll catch some of them.
Look man, we are trying to boil it down to a mostly unimportant single number and then declare which is better! Your absurd idea of a series of difficult and useful comparisons is just plain crazy-talk.
As someone who has lived for a long time in several non-English speaking countries, I can tell you that many don't bother to learn much of it after arriving, either. It's baffling.
Despite what the summary says, he didn't create the problem. He recognized it and took a position. He may not be a good guy, but it wasn't stealing.
"It's not as much fun" is a pretty tepid argument against self-driving cars. "Of course they'll be better in every other way. But think of the fun!" Just as there are places you can go ride horses today, there will be places where you can go drive a car.
Statistically, yes it is. 23 year old males are total idiots when it comes to their safety.
So then your notion is that it's perfectly reasonable to believe that a World Cup will suddenly be held starting the very next day. Are the teams frantically packing their bags and rushing to the airport in order to make the opening kickoff?
Dictators don't ask.
Basically, you're saying humans should be more rational than we are. But we're not. We could barely form civilization, and it's not yet clear that we can maintain it.
There's litigation insurance that covers losses on suits the policy holder initiates?
You can't be in the 1% without the other 99.
Years ago Volvo invented and patented the three-point seat belt. But they found it to be such a boon to safety that they gave it away without royalties.
Today, "pedestrian detection" costs extra?
Until Uber came along, buying taxi medallions had been a quite good investment. They're crashing now, though.
Is your wife a vegetable?
Become Chief Design Officer.
At night, while your children are sleeping, it will whisper ads into their ears.
It might be as much as 3/4, as they also have to get the front/back oriented.
A more cynical person would find that to be +5, Funny.
It's funny that those living way out in the suburbs are "the poor".
That's exactly what this already is. It's as if there were a toll booth every mile, collecting 1.5 cents.
If it's possible to offer some compelling new service for 1-2 dollars per month, why not just charge that directly, instead of the Rube Goldberg method?
I've been beta-testing the iAnal, and let me tell you, those rounded corners really pay off.
Not disbarred for this, disbarred for their previous shenanigans. .
Oh stewardess, I speak racist. He said:
Such a group of people I despise. The powers that be want the people to view any incident not in terms of the individual, but rather that person's group, as it is easier to control by group or type rather than many separate and rational individuals.