Perhaps there are simply no Google employees named Ruth. But that's not important now. The inspiration for my comment starts at about 40 seconds or so.
He never approved my comment or provided any feedback.
And so to you the only reasonable explanation is that he read your comment and covered it up, secure in knowing that no one else could catch that error, even though (assuming it's true) it would be obvious to millions of people.
Comments "awaiting moderation" are often never read by anyone and simply fall into a bucket. If they get moderated at all they can easily be inadvertently flagged as spam along with dozens and dozens of other actual spam comments.
Trust and loyalty, loyalty and trust. Our two real assets are trust and loyalty...and ruthless efficiency. Our three real assets are trust, loyalty, and ruthless efficiency...and an almost fanatical devotion to the Pope. Our four...no...Amongst our assets...amongst our assetry...are such elements as trust, loyalty... I'll come in again.
What is the "consideration" given to the patient, in exchange for giving up copyright?
I thought about that too, but I just assumed the company that created the contract also addressed that issue. Maybe "these are my fees, but the agreement gives you a 10% discount," or something like that. If consideration was not addressed by that company it'd be pretty darn stupid.
As a youngster I was once ridiculed for writing "keep a tight rein on it." Scarred me for life. Or maybe for two minutes. But obviously I haven't forgotten it.
How about using it against someone besides some poor schmuck found with a roach in the ashtray? Beats the hell out of giving the bastard free room and board...
Yes, because making it profitable to arrest someone is such a good idea. What could possibly go wrong?
Any terrorist with a simple grasp of binomial theory could work out the number of terrorists to send through the gate necessary to achieve a 90% confidence that one of them gets through with the bomb
So your theory is that the more bombers you have the less likely you get caught? Interesting. You think that once they found a bomb they would say something like "Well I'm glad we caught that guy! Everybody else enjoy your trip! Bon Voyage!"
The sentence does not say it was surprising that they released a tablet. It says "the Surface tablet." In other words, the product as it is was a surprise, not that it was a tablet.
Someone should invent a thing where you can tell it what you want to find out and it would look in a catalog of information that it had compiled. On the internet. I'll bet that would be popular.
I think your question-to-statment ratio in that post was way out of whack, leading to a -1, This Guy's a Loony moderation. Just speculating, of course.
Electric cars add a level of indirection. There are various ways to produce electricity, and as the economics change the production can be adapted without affecting the "client." Surely programmers and developers shouldn't even be arguing about this.
Even the 3 cents per $100 quickly adds up. It would kill liquidity and widen spreads. You're addressing one problem by creating a new and more damaging one.
Slashdot Mirror
Perhaps it's due to the interference of a tinfoil hat, but we cannot read your mind. You must actually write down any questions you wish to pose.
Perhaps there are simply no Google employees named Ruth. But that's not important now. The inspiration for my comment starts at about 40 seconds or so.
That's nearly seizure inducing.
And so to you the only reasonable explanation is that he read your comment and covered it up, secure in knowing that no one else could catch that error, even though (assuming it's true) it would be obvious to millions of people.
Comments "awaiting moderation" are often never read by anyone and simply fall into a bucket. If they get moderated at all they can easily be inadvertently flagged as spam along with dozens and dozens of other actual spam comments.
Trust and loyalty, loyalty and trust. Our two real assets are trust and loyalty...and ruthless efficiency. Our three real assets are trust, loyalty, and ruthless efficiency...and an almost fanatical devotion to the Pope. Our four ...no...Amongst our assets...amongst our assetry...are such elements as trust, loyalty... I'll come in again.
Nobody did.
One of the key defenses to posting critical reviews is they are opinions, not merely facts, though of course they may contain facts.
I thought about that too, but I just assumed the company that created the contract also addressed that issue. Maybe "these are my fees, but the agreement gives you a 10% discount," or something like that. If consideration was not addressed by that company it'd be pretty darn stupid.
And I'll be 93. They won't need any fancy technology to know I'm looking for Depends, Geritol*, and "Get Off My Lawn" signs.
*Do they even make Geritol anymore?
The target in this case seems to have been "the water," so not exactly something to brag about. Maybe if they had somehow missed...
ibrahim Balic is apparently responsible for the breach (by his own admission).
And old Blaise would spin in his grave if he knew you were attempting to apply it to that notion of yours.
As a youngster I was once ridiculed for writing "keep a tight rein on it." Scarred me for life. Or maybe for two minutes. But obviously I haven't forgotten it.
Yes, because making it profitable to arrest someone is such a good idea. What could possibly go wrong?
So your theory is that the more bombers you have the less likely you get caught? Interesting. You think that once they found a bomb they would say something like "Well I'm glad we caught that guy! Everybody else enjoy your trip! Bon Voyage!"
The sentence does not say it was surprising that they released a tablet. It says "the Surface tablet." In other words, the product as it is was a surprise, not that it was a tablet.
There are no pixels to access if you missed the picture while waiting for the camera to get ready.
Good point.
"When the sun's defective, wear reflective." No, that's no good.
"When the sun's not detected, make sure you're reflected." That's better.
(And of course right out is "If you're not reflected, the mourners will be genuflected." It's not even a good rhyme.)
Someone should invent a thing where you can tell it what you want to find out and it would look in a catalog of information that it had compiled. On the internet. I'll bet that would be popular.
You are delusional. You really think they will use fighter planes intercept a flight just to arrest this guy?
If you have a genuine solution to that problem you could write your own ticket.
When I make Skype calls it shows me who I'm talking to. Therefore....
I think your question-to-statment ratio in that post was way out of whack, leading to a -1, This Guy's a Loony moderation. Just speculating, of course.
Electric cars add a level of indirection. There are various ways to produce electricity, and as the economics change the production can be adapted without affecting the "client." Surely programmers and developers shouldn't even be arguing about this.
Even the 3 cents per $100 quickly adds up. It would kill liquidity and widen spreads. You're addressing one problem by creating a new and more damaging one.