Recalls are just par for the course in the auto industry. This is a tiny one. But for a company that is racking up debt and burning capital, cash flow is vital and recalls are draining $$ that are needed for growth. A large safety recall, if it were to occur, is a bigger risk for them than the large auto makers..
For someone who railed against the "mainstream media", it's surprising that Trump would support a policy allowing the largest media companies to become even larger.
It has zero to do with news. Its an outdated policy that was created back when local was one of the only, if not only choice. It makes no sense today, most people have options.
The 'hearings' you speak of were just a political mess. We all know why Lerner took the 5th, because that removed ties and prevented proof that there was a white house connection. No, they never showed they treated both parties equally, those were claims made by dems that you soaked up. And you don't plead the fifth when there is nothing to hide. I see you are well schooled and have bought in to the excuses though. That tells me you are not worth talking to on these topics.
Personally, I have no problem with any president not releasing visitor logs. They should be released to legitimate investigative efforts when there is good reason (as was agreed by the court in the Obama case). There are too many people 'out to get' one side or the other, and anyone who visits becomes a political target.
I thought non-poaching agreements were found to be against the law.
Such agreements between two companies are generally not legal, but no-compete clauses or similar wording in employment contracts that limits and employee from taking talent with them if they leave are not necessarily covered by that same ruling.
You make hard work of ignoring that Obama DID argue against releasing them, and part of that argument was that it would serve no purpose.I suppose my paraphrase give you enough excuse for dismissal and denial. Of course we all know he just wanted to cover up connection to the IRS scandal, of which Lerner had to plead the fifth for obvious reasons. I'm sure that was all fine with you though. The point is the hypocrites who didn't make a peep when O didn't want them released.
He argued the case against Sloan who maintained “White House visitor records have proven of enormous value to the public" and lost. Maybe you just forgot. Here is just one of the many stories about it to help you remember.
It's wrong on every level. When your big idea is to maintain your cartel status by regulating the competition at every government level it's obvious that your competition is onto something and you are morally and intellectually bankrupt.
The regulations in existence didn't come at the behest of the hotel industry. But now they they must operate under them, they SHOULD use them to protect themselves. Why would they agree to operate under those regulators while a growing competitor doesn't have to?
If you don't like the regulations themselves, then tell us which ones to get rid of and why.
"It doesn't really matter if either of these new magnets proves useful in the future. The ability to rapidly predict their existence is a major coup and will be invaluable to scientists making drinking wagers moving forward."
It is an important consideration that those that seek a second opinion often have reason to. It can be that the first doctor is uncertain, or the patient senses it, or the diagnosis doesn't seem right. It is not uncommon for doctors to recommend a second opinion when they are not sure or to make certain before treatment is started.
The next questions is, how often is the first doctor's diagnosis correct?
My best friend had a TRS-80. We spent a lot of time on it. I moved 10 miles away so it was harder to get to his place. I would write programs (mostly games) on code paper then call him and read them to him over the phone as he entered them, then get the hear him describe the output.
You literally have to read it over a couple of times to grasp that the article is really about President Obama's spying and has nothing to do with Trump.
Some might not want to remember who was in office in 2016.
Practicing BDSM is a personal choice made by consenting adults.
Is it always that simple? What if one of those 'consenting' adults is a disturbed or mentally ill person, maybe one that had suffered many cruelties in their childhood or some other trauma that affected their self importance?
Tesla guarantees resale value for the first few years too, so the used market will never offer cars for less than Tesla will buy them back for. Since Tesla's offer is average for a luxury car, the private resale value will always be above average.
Which really has nothing to do with the topic at hand. You may want to read the fine print of the Tesla 'guarantee' before you tout it.
Slashdot Mirror
Recalls are just par for the course in the auto industry. This is a tiny one. But for a company that is racking up debt and burning capital, cash flow is vital and recalls are draining $$ that are needed for growth. A large safety recall, if it were to occur, is a bigger risk for them than the large auto makers..
For someone who railed against the "mainstream media", it's surprising that Trump would support a policy allowing the largest media companies to become even larger.
It has zero to do with news. Its an outdated policy that was created back when local was one of the only, if not only choice. It makes no sense today, most people have options.
It says it will produce torque from the fuel cells. You don't get torque from fuel cells.
Please Mr. Summary writer. You are not getting torque from a fuel cell stack. That's the job of the motor.
The 'hearings' you speak of were just a political mess. We all know why Lerner took the 5th, because that removed ties and prevented proof that there was a white house connection. No, they never showed they treated both parties equally, those were claims made by dems that you soaked up. And you don't plead the fifth when there is nothing to hide. I see you are well schooled and have bought in to the excuses though. That tells me you are not worth talking to on these topics.
Personally, I have no problem with any president not releasing visitor logs. They should be released to legitimate investigative efforts when there is good reason (as was agreed by the court in the Obama case). There are too many people 'out to get' one side or the other, and anyone who visits becomes a political target.
I thought non-poaching agreements were found to be against the law.
Such agreements between two companies are generally not legal, but no-compete clauses or similar wording in employment contracts that limits and employee from taking talent with them if they leave are not necessarily covered by that same ruling.
You make hard work of ignoring that Obama DID argue against releasing them, and part of that argument was that it would serve no purpose.I suppose my paraphrase give you enough excuse for dismissal and denial. Of course we all know he just wanted to cover up connection to the IRS scandal, of which Lerner had to plead the fifth for obvious reasons. I'm sure that was all fine with you though. The point is the hypocrites who didn't make a peep when O didn't want them released.
He argued the case against Sloan who maintained “White House visitor records have proven of enormous value to the public" and lost. Maybe you just forgot. Here is just one of the many stories about it to help you remember.
http://pamelageller.com/2013/0...
Did anyone feel it was ever "open" ?
The O admin kept telling us those logs were useless and inaccurate anyhow.
So those anti-regulation Republicans will shun this, right?
They'll be glad to get rid of some of the regulations. I don't think they are as interested, one way or the other, in picking who they apply to.
Lobbyist in the hotel lobby.
Those leaked documents were found just sitting there in the hotel lobby.
It's wrong on every level. When your big idea is to maintain your cartel status by regulating the competition at every government level it's obvious that your competition is onto something and you are morally and intellectually bankrupt.
The regulations in existence didn't come at the behest of the hotel industry. But now they they must operate under them, they SHOULD use them to protect themselves. Why would they agree to operate under those regulators while a growing competitor doesn't have to?
If you don't like the regulations themselves, then tell us which ones to get rid of and why.
"It doesn't really matter if either of these new magnets proves useful in the future. The ability to rapidly predict their existence is a major coup and will be invaluable to scientists making drinking wagers moving forward."
fixed that
It is an important consideration that those that seek a second opinion often have reason to. It can be that the first doctor is uncertain, or the patient senses it, or the diagnosis doesn't seem right. It is not uncommon for doctors to recommend a second opinion when they are not sure or to make certain before treatment is started.
The next questions is, how often is the first doctor's diagnosis correct?
We don't know what the CEO said. Only what one person claims he said.
My best friend had a TRS-80. We spent a lot of time on it. I moved 10 miles away so it was harder to get to his place. I would write programs (mostly games) on code paper then call him and read them to him over the phone as he entered them, then get the hear him describe the output.
You literally have to read it over a couple of times to grasp that the article is really about President Obama's spying and has nothing to do with Trump.
Some might not want to remember who was in office in 2016.
for $20-$30k you can get basically free electricity. >
Whoodathunkit!
Once you go dark, you'll never go bark.
...what? No one told us what "dark mode" is supposed to MEAN. Autism, much, subby?
Its to view videos from the dark web, of course.
Since when did selling a car in just under 3 months qualify as quick?
Hah. I sold my old 99 rusty Silverado pickup last year in 3 days.
Practicing BDSM is a personal choice made by consenting adults.
Is it always that simple? What if one of those 'consenting' adults is a disturbed or mentally ill person, maybe one that had suffered many cruelties in their childhood or some other trauma that affected their self importance?
It's a prototype and TFA says it only has 1kg of material so it would be fairly small. This thing is producing a lot of water for 1kg.
It also say 'spread in to a thin sheet'. So it would be huge. And why do you consider it a 'lot of water' for 1kg?
Tesla guarantees resale value for the first few years too, so the used market will never offer cars for less than Tesla will buy them back for. Since Tesla's offer is average for a luxury car, the private resale value will always be above average.
Which really has nothing to do with the topic at hand. You may want to read the fine print of the Tesla 'guarantee' before you tout it.
I see you completely don't get it. Its OK, you don't need to.