It was a British aerospace engineer Roger Shawyer, who founded the company Satellite Propulsion Research Ltd (SPR) (UK) in the year 2000 to develop his invention (wikipedia)
But you know, whatever keeps the US relevant.
"Even if this doesn't give us faster-than-light communications"
You acknowledge communications are impossible using QE pairs (which is correct as passing information via entangled particles is not possible)
"Imagine a submarine with one of a pair of particles in a transmitter. Wiggle (bounce, or whatever) that particle and watch its partner on land. You now have a comm link"
Then you go on to contradict yourself by discussing communications using QE particles, which is not possible.
It's also *not* proving a negative as there is no proof of absence involved here.
I think you missed the whole meaning of "can't be used to send information". You acknowledge this at the start and then decide to ignore it at the end.
NASA and ESA plan a project together... NASA then pulls out due to "funding cutbacks" leaving ESA in the shit and then does a u-turn and decides to do it alone
No, nature is following physics and mathematics not sacred geometry. Sacred geometry is only a construct of the human brain. Nothing more, nothing less. It's ok, I'll assume you've not had your lithium yet.;)
Explain what exactly? Why natural selection took a certain specific path that represents the Fibonacci sequence? I'm sure you can Google that for yourself.
What a drama queen. I think you know that later versions of an OS do intend to fix problems of earlier versions. I'd also guess you know that Google are not going to go out of the way to help you to install older versions of an OS more than providing images.
It's less about knowing, it's just that we've changed that labelling to consider those stars part of our galaxy. Just like we didn't suddenly discover Pluto just because it was relabelled as a minor-planet
as is iObit's software that has frequent updates that force you to download and install from scratch each time.. while you carefully look for opt outs each time.
Because to wont stay regular and privileged for long.. They will move the goalposts to poor and regular... but we'll still pay the premium for the upper tier. We ALL lose.
Slashdot Mirror
Seriously.. "Particle physics is like dots and stuff"
Just shows the state of the US when they hate human liberty unless its by the gun.
Who said 4k?
Already can with my GTX 980
Cancer... thats what happens.
Pixel art games are more popular now than they have been since the 1980's.
Anyone who asks this question (again) really has no clue about what desktop applications are beyond word processors and spreadsheets.
Why don't they just sit at the back of the class and just listen while real companies launch mobile OSs
It was a British aerospace engineer Roger Shawyer, who founded the company Satellite Propulsion Research Ltd (SPR) (UK) in the year 2000 to develop his invention (wikipedia) But you know, whatever keeps the US relevant.
"Even if this doesn't give us faster-than-light communications"
You acknowledge communications are impossible using QE pairs (which is correct as passing information via entangled particles is not possible)
"Imagine a submarine with one of a pair of particles in a transmitter. Wiggle (bounce, or whatever) that particle and watch its partner on land. You now have a comm link"
Then you go on to contradict yourself by discussing communications using QE particles, which is not possible.
It's also *not* proving a negative as there is no proof of absence involved here.
I think you missed the whole meaning of "can't be used to send information". You acknowledge this at the start and then decide to ignore it at the end.
about iDevice users
Let the latest round of wanking begin
NASA and ESA plan a project together... NASA then pulls out due to "funding cutbacks" leaving ESA in the shit and then does a u-turn and decides to do it alone
There is no strict definition, but the most commonly used one is: A moon is never the larger mass and the larger mass has to be a planet.
isn't that how the corruption in America works?
No, nature is following physics and mathematics not sacred geometry. Sacred geometry is only a construct of the human brain. Nothing more, nothing less. It's ok, I'll assume you've not had your lithium yet. ;)
Explain what exactly? Why natural selection took a certain specific path that represents the Fibonacci sequence? I'm sure you can Google that for yourself.
So play other games... whats the problem here?
What a drama queen. I think you know that later versions of an OS do intend to fix problems of earlier versions. I'd also guess you know that Google are not going to go out of the way to help you to install older versions of an OS more than providing images.
It's less about knowing, it's just that we've changed that labelling to consider those stars part of our galaxy. Just like we didn't suddenly discover Pluto just because it was relabelled as a minor-planet
Nature follows the rules of mathematics.. NOT sacred geometry.
as is iObit's software that has frequent updates that force you to download and install from scratch each time.. while you carefully look for opt outs each time.
Because to wont stay regular and privileged for long.. They will move the goalposts to poor and regular... but we'll still pay the premium for the upper tier. We ALL lose.
Yes.. but an explosion has a center and expands into something.. Both of which don't exist for the big bang.