Collecting? Then you are talking about presentation, not the actual content of those books. Could have all white pages inside for what matters
At least for me, the main reason i keep book is because i could read them again later, or give to another person. In both cases should not matter presentation (unless the person i give it is not as comfortable as me with the particular media on which i have it, of course). While i could find them, don't matter so much how look my library.
Sometimes content includes presentation, but not always content needs it. Most books in particular, as flow of words, of ideas, not of something physical, should be independent of presentation, so any way to transmit it, comfortably enogh for the receiver, should be equivalent, so either audio, reading in a cellphone, pdf, computer montior, printed book or wallscreen should be more or less the same.
There are some special books that pushes the possibilities of that media, that does some trick with the material, the pagination, what you should see at once in that physical form, etc. But for most of them don't matter that much how you "read" them.
World's most prolific patenter could be more accurate way to describe him. Not taking away his merit, but maybe in the past there was more people that invented more things, but as not documented or patented their inventons aren't taken into account.
They included how well they ranked in the acid test, but most of the article was about raw speed. But for "best" there are more criteria to take into account. Features, availability of extensions (specially the ones you in particular need), OSs where it runs, security, matters at the moment of making a choice. But at least is a good clue that opera and chrome are usually the fastest ones, safari and firefox aren't so far, and IE is the worst choice is speed is an important factor.
The main debatable test was the specific sites benchmarks one, as it could had measured in good part how much tuned for specific browsers are those sites, but if are the kind of sites you visit more, probably could notice the difference (at least, until that sites acknowledge that worth optimizing for webkit or gecko too).
In a war both sides are fighting... but so far, only the bot(net)s are attacking, and what the "attacked" front does efficiently is giving them more drones. Is not war, is harvest.
Aren't they distributing hostile flash videogames? Should all flash, silverlight, advanced html5 and java be blocked to avoid breaking the law?
Internet is the ultimate test to tell when some law is just stupid, and you don't need to be a "benevolent dictator" to have in your portfolio a lot of that kind of laws.
Words have several meanings, thinking on a word, specially in different contexts, could have different waves. So having something without different associations, like letters, can be used for this. But you could still can have "hotkeys" waves, that means something maybe abstract, or maybe very used, and have them as hotkeys.
And with 30second/letter times, using cellphone like assisted writting could be useful (and there you need "keys" to select which offered word anyway), or like this in a desktop environment.
You mean death penalty for writting a program? Is not murder, is not physically attack them to steal, its not even looking at pictures of naked children, probably the vast majority of them ever noticed that they had that installed. And the biggest component of the attack was getting thru a floor level big size window that the house maker left open so the owners could feel some air, they were practically invited to get in.
Think in drugs. There are a lot of drug addicts with withdrawal symptoms making trouble around, so you tax everyone to buy them new doses to keep them quiet for a few days. Of course, the ones giving that doses will have their daily profit that way, so is a good business, while fixing the problem is not.
Nostradamus predictions... each new researcher recover new data from that noise. (each word of this should be quoted, as almost none is what it mean).
Is risky to "fill in the blanks" or give your own (i.e. following a set of rules) meaning to noise, it will show things as you think they should be, and the exceptions will be missed or discarded.
That is 50-50 is good news if the sample was broad enough . Could be interesting to match that numbers with amount of users... could be a lot of those programs that their userbase coincide (or is even lower) with the amount of developers, and see how insecure are programs with more than 100,1000 or even more users (i.e. if the top 20 % of top safe applications have the 80 % or more of users,or the distribution is better than that).
The weakest component of a closed, safe door is the person that can open it from inside. The main vulnerability that introduces social networking sites is social engineering, in a way or another. Is pretty bad (or good) that they are open to the "real" world, and that could be influenced by the views of normal people, but add lack of privacy implied in some of those social networks, and a bit of malice, and bad things could happen.
It's just too predictable. The last time Microsoft surprised me was when they did something even worse than they use to do. Even comics villains are more dimensional than them.
Setting precedents opens the door to business opportunities. Just put a sign or whatever near very public and photographed places, and sue any publication that from now on include photos of those places because they are sharing your sign too. Even a grafitti could eventually do the work.
There are 5 well-known approaches: 3 good solutions, 1 acceptable solution that is slower than necessary and 1 bad approach that doesn’t really work. Microsoft appears to have picked the bad approach.
We are still talking here about the random selection of browsers, or something more broad?
Complementing the story about Passive-Aggresive wifi Hotspots, the new trend could putting them locked with password, and naming them ThePasswordIsXYZ9923. They are not open, but whoever wants to use them will be able to do it.
Slashdot Mirror
And the worst part is how similar is becoming to the spanish inquisition
Was Chuck Norris
Now we can begin our own "How many netbook owners does it takes to change a lightbulb" jokes.
Collecting? Then you are talking about presentation, not the actual content of those books. Could have all white pages inside for what matters
At least for me, the main reason i keep book is because i could read them again later, or give to another person. In both cases should not matter presentation (unless the person i give it is not as comfortable as me with the particular media on which i have it, of course). While i could find them, don't matter so much how look my library.
Sometimes content includes presentation, but not always content needs it. Most books in particular, as flow of words, of ideas, not of something physical, should be independent of presentation, so any way to transmit it, comfortably enogh for the receiver, should be equivalent, so either audio, reading in a cellphone, pdf, computer montior, printed book or wallscreen should be more or less the same.
There are some special books that pushes the possibilities of that media, that does some trick with the material, the pagination, what you should see at once in that physical form, etc. But for most of them don't matter that much how you "read" them.
World's most prolific patenter could be more accurate way to describe him. Not taking away his merit, but maybe in the past there was more people that invented more things, but as not documented or patented their inventons aren't taken into account.
They included how well they ranked in the acid test, but most of the article was about raw speed. But for "best" there are more criteria to take into account. Features, availability of extensions (specially the ones you in particular need), OSs where it runs, security, matters at the moment of making a choice. But at least is a good clue that opera and chrome are usually the fastest ones, safari and firefox aren't so far, and IE is the worst choice is speed is an important factor.
The main debatable test was the specific sites benchmarks one, as it could had measured in good part how much tuned for specific browsers are those sites, but if are the kind of sites you visit more, probably could notice the difference (at least, until that sites acknowledge that worth optimizing for webkit or gecko too).
Probably thats why is a new kind of matter: don't matter.
In a war both sides are fighting... but so far, only the bot(net)s are attacking, and what the "attacked" front does efficiently is giving them more drones. Is not war, is harvest.
Blame Canada
Aren't they distributing hostile flash videogames? Should all flash, silverlight, advanced html5 and java be blocked to avoid breaking the law?
Internet is the ultimate test to tell when some law is just stupid, and you don't need to be a "benevolent dictator" to have in your portfolio a lot of that kind of laws.
And with 30second/letter times, using cellphone like assisted writting could be useful (and there you need "keys" to select which offered word anyway), or like this in a desktop environment.
You mean death penalty for writting a program? Is not murder, is not physically attack them to steal, its not even looking at pictures of naked children, probably the vast majority of them ever noticed that they had that installed. And the biggest component of the attack was getting thru a floor level big size window that the house maker left open so the owners could feel some air, they were practically invited to get in.
Tell that to their victims and their will go in person, or hire well provided porn actors for that.
Should be no reason to be running anti-virus nowadays, if were taken years ago as Essential Security to not run Microsoft.
Think in drugs. There are a lot of drug addicts with withdrawal symptoms making trouble around, so you tax everyone to buy them new doses to keep them quiet for a few days. Of course, the ones giving that doses will have their daily profit that way, so is a good business, while fixing the problem is not.
Susan Blackmore has written more than a bit around it, and her TED talk about this and the future is pretty interesting.
Nostradamus predictions... each new researcher recover new data from that noise. (each word of this should be quoted, as almost none is what it mean).
Is risky to "fill in the blanks" or give your own (i.e. following a set of rules) meaning to noise, it will show things as you think they should be, and the exceptions will be missed or discarded.
That is 50-50 is good news if the sample was broad enough . Could be interesting to match that numbers with amount of users... could be a lot of those programs that their userbase coincide (or is even lower) with the amount of developers, and see how insecure are programs with more than 100,1000 or even more users (i.e. if the top 20 % of top safe applications have the 80 % or more of users,or the distribution is better than that).
The weakest component of a closed, safe door is the person that can open it from inside. The main vulnerability that introduces social networking sites is social engineering, in a way or another. Is pretty bad (or good) that they are open to the "real" world, and that could be influenced by the views of normal people, but add lack of privacy implied in some of those social networks, and a bit of malice, and bad things could happen.
Reading studies that attacks violent video games makes you more aggresive. If we are going meta, lets go all the way.
It's just too predictable. The last time Microsoft surprised me was when they did something even worse than they use to do. Even comics villains are more dimensional than them.
Setting precedents opens the door to business opportunities. Just put a sign or whatever near very public and photographed places, and sue any publication that from now on include photos of those places because they are sharing your sign too. Even a grafitti could eventually do the work.
There are 5 well-known approaches: 3 good solutions, 1 acceptable solution that is slower than necessary and 1 bad approach that doesn’t really work. Microsoft appears to have picked the bad approach.
We are still talking here about the random selection of browsers, or something more broad?
Complementing the story about Passive-Aggresive wifi Hotspots, the new trend could putting them locked with password, and naming them ThePasswordIsXYZ9923. They are not open, but whoever wants to use them will be able to do it.