I think you'd have been better off if you simply banned the people who created tension rather than just saying no to moba. Common sense should tell you that if somebody is instigating physical conflict, then the person is at fault, not the topic.
You don't even need to get that far. The scientist compared them to "natural" plants, saying they grow better. That means they aren't natural, so the food religion will shun them just like GMO.
I'm not poor and I torrent. Though I also tend to pay for the highest speed internet tiers available. But admittedly, that's a habit I've carried over from when I was poor.
Those apps are only accurate if the person knows to look for and check other symptoms as well.
For example, influenza, kidney disease, and aortic dissection all produce basically the same symptoms, however each of them also have other symptoms that the patient probably won't look for, and an app probably won't ask them to look for, and even if it did, the person checking these symptoms might do it wrong.
And, a wrong diagnosis on any of these can have deadly consequences.
I think you misunderstood what is happening here. This is a business and marketing deal for Sprint. They get to hand out the first one for free and charge a lot for added services.
I'm somewhat inclined to think that there's probably a tax writeoff somewhere. That is, for each line that they give somebody for free, they might do something like claim that they "donated" whatever the regular price is, even though it doesn't cost them anywhere near that much. And given how shitty Sprint is, they could use all of the cost savings they can get.
As a man, I can tell you that this is not "joshing around guy talk". I've never met anyone who talks like this, ever.
I don't, but I've met people who do, and when they talk in public they tend to be very PC, social justice, anti-misogyny, etc, and overall they are very politically left leaning. In case you haven't met one of these, Bill Cosby is an excellent example.
Something about the government retaliating over a private organizations poor security seems off putting... even if it is about the election. It is sad that showing the truth and what politicians say to moneyed interests behind closed doors is seen as a danger to our democracy.
Nepotism, basically. They might frame it as a national security issue, but I highly doubt they would do the same for any other political party.
It would probably be a very bad thing if the safe harbor provision of the DMCA was repealed. However we could stand to lose the anti circumvention provision and the no linking interpretation.
(1) he chose alternative treatments (2) he died (3) therefore...he might have died in the same amount of time, or died earlier, or died later with conventional cancer treatments
Absolutely false. Read the link I posted, specifically this bit:
The condition might have been nipped in the bud if Jobs had acted right away. Jobs's cancer manifest in neuroendocrine tumors, which are typically far less lethal than the "pancreatic adenocarcinoma" that make up 95 percent of pancreatic cancer cases. Amri said neuroendocrine tumors are so "mild" that...
"In my series of patients, for many subtypes, the survival rate was as high as 100% over a decade...
However he figured alternative medicine is better and tried some stupid hippie vegetarian diet thinking it would work, and needless to say it didn't.
Jobs ultimately had a liver transplant, which meant that he gave it a TON of time to metastasize rather than having it removed.
Every business is invariably going to have a monopoly on something, especially when it comes to copyrighted works and patents, which are that way by design. Android is a mix of both.
As for whether Google has an overall market monopoly, yeah they likely do for web search (and smartphone platforms in most overseas markets, but not in the US.) However unlike what most people know as monopolies, there really isn't anything compelling end users to switch to it other than they just want to. And in the case of Windows at least, that requires the end user to actually go out of their way to do so, and there's no tie ins or anything like that compelling them other than they just prefer it over the competition. Sure, if you install chrome it defaults to Google search, but consider that on a default windows install if you open edge/IE and type in "download chrome", Microsoft's bing throws up a javascript overlay practically begging the end user to not do it, and yet it seems that most of them do it anyways.
Apple still makes features exclusive for its newer hardware. For example, when Siri came out, it would only turn on for newer devices, but people with jailbroken phones were still able to make it work anyways without any apparent issues.
Just because you don't understand the context, doesn't mean the debate doesn't exist. As is obvious from the content, it has nothing to do with Trump
Are you high? Here, let me quote it for you:
Desperate Donald, there's no point...in submitting posts as an AC. We all recognize your style, roll our eyes at the bigoted and desperate moron, then we move along.
I honestly doubt Trump gives a shit about slashdot, so you'd have to explain better how it's relevant in any context. Furthermore, some AC posts are pretty good, and sometimes there are good reasons for regular users to post as AC. I recall one time a self confessed pedophile posted as AC to explain that even though he was attracted to children, he had never attempted to have sex with one, which if you ask me is a sane thing to do because it doesn't matter whether or not one abuses children, if they confess to even thinking about that then their life is pretty much over, and for no good reason.
Hell, I've posted as AC myself to make some decidedly un-PC jokes that I just don't want associated with my regular identity here. And you know what? There's nothing wrong with that. Sure, some twats get offended, but that's their problem, especially the times when those posts get modded +5 funny.
You do know that there were dozens of more advanced routing prototocols developed in between the IP being created and the internet becoming mainstream right ? The most common was X.25 - and frankly if an X.25 network was the Mona Lisa then IP was the drawing on your fridge that your 3-year old did in crayon.
Either you're joking or you're on crack. If you reversed your logic (i.e. calling x.25 inferior) it would make a LOT more sense. X.25 has basically no modularity whatsoever, and in fact was created before the OSI model was even a thing, which means that the number of things you can use it for and its overall scalability is shit. X.25 furthermore isn't at all analogous to IP because the whole thing much more closely resembles a layer 2 protocol, only it happens to specify some details that would in today's terms be considered layers 1 an d3. Also, because X.25 specifies what the physical layer looks like (which was unreliable as hell) the vast majority of the specification is all about error correction. It's also for this reason that it's slow as shit.
In fact, you know what technology replaced X.25? Frame relay. And frame relay was considered slow, so it was later replaced by MOE and MPLS.
All those massive privately owned large-scale networks (mostly country-wide) which prolifirated in the 1980s under various governments and corporations had their own routing protocols, most made IP look primitive.
IP probably looks primitive to you because, unlike everything else you mentioned, it only has one purpose: Facilitating the transfer of information between networks. That's it. Everything else is handled elsewhere in the OSI model. In fact if you care to notice, IPv6 is even less complex than IPv4. The simplicity is an advantage, not a drawback.
It may sound insurmountable to build an entirely new network on the same cables that replaces the internet with something better but it really isn't
Dude you really have no idea what the fuck you're even talking about. I shouldn't have even bothered replying the second I saw you advocate X.25 as being somehow superior, but I had already typed it by the time I read this.
How can you possibly argue that I don't have anything? In terms of global incomes, I'm in the top 0.1% of income earners. I buy shit all the time on Amazon that, at the end of the day, I don't really need. Factory workers in China that work 16 hour days don't have even an eighth of the shit that I have. Granted they take much longer work vacations than I do, their hourly rate is much lower.
an economy that's fscking over the middle class and making them pay for everything
I think I fit the definition of the middle class (between my job and the rent I collect I make just north of $80k/year) and I don't feel like I am being made to "pay for everything", nor do I feel like I'm being fucked over in any way. The top 1% income earners pay 50% of all of the federal income taxes, and the bottom 80% (which I'm part of) barely pay 15%, so please do explain why you think I'm getting fucked over and/or how I am being made to "pay for everything."
It scares the crap out of me that here on Slashdot, a site with presumably smart people like engineers and programmers, so many people are defending and rooting for Donald Trump.
The post you replied to doesn't appear to be doing that. Though GGGP posts may have been, they were done by ACs, which could very well be the same ACs that post GNAA spam.
Besides, ones intelligence isn't inherently going to make them favor a particular candidate. That, and to be honest I think the whole presidential race is stupid anyways.
The thing is, *every* other web browser, including shitty IE, renders google maps really smoothly, except firefox. I've checked, all of the acceleration stuff is enabled.
Personally, I don't think it would be possible without sacrificing speed in a really bad way. You wouldn't be able to rely on things like summary routes, which means backbone routers would be considerably slower under the weight of much bigger and more complex routing tables (which also means that you probably couldn't rely on ASICs being practical either.) You probably couldn't rely on the existing prefix length (ipv6) or subnet mask (ipv4) system at all (which uses dead simple AND operations to calculate packet destinations.) You'd also by necessity have to go through a network discovery period, likely even on the client side like TOR has to do, each time you need to connect to a host.
Slashdot Mirror
I think you'd have been better off if you simply banned the people who created tension rather than just saying no to moba. Common sense should tell you that if somebody is instigating physical conflict, then the person is at fault, not the topic.
Actually at my place we're going SDWAN. And from what I can tell, it ultimately won't solve any problems other than offering slightly better uptime.
You don't even need to get that far. The scientist compared them to "natural" plants, saying they grow better. That means they aren't natural, so the food religion will shun them just like GMO.
I'm not poor and I torrent. Though I also tend to pay for the highest speed internet tiers available. But admittedly, that's a habit I've carried over from when I was poor.
Verizon has spent $15 billion on FIOS.
Damn, that's enough to pay the administrative costs alone for social security for two years.
This is why I decided to be a network engineer. You can outsource everything, but if your network is down, what are you going to do?
Sure, I could probably make more as a developer, but meh, I'm happy with my current salary.
Especially not this one.
Those apps are only accurate if the person knows to look for and check other symptoms as well.
For example, influenza, kidney disease, and aortic dissection all produce basically the same symptoms, however each of them also have other symptoms that the patient probably won't look for, and an app probably won't ask them to look for, and even if it did, the person checking these symptoms might do it wrong.
And, a wrong diagnosis on any of these can have deadly consequences.
I think you misunderstood what is happening here. This is a business and marketing deal for Sprint. They get to hand out the first one for free and charge a lot for added services.
I'm somewhat inclined to think that there's probably a tax writeoff somewhere. That is, for each line that they give somebody for free, they might do something like claim that they "donated" whatever the regular price is, even though it doesn't cost them anywhere near that much. And given how shitty Sprint is, they could use all of the cost savings they can get.
As a man, I can tell you that this is not "joshing around guy talk". I've never met anyone who talks like this, ever.
I don't, but I've met people who do, and when they talk in public they tend to be very PC, social justice, anti-misogyny, etc, and overall they are very politically left leaning. In case you haven't met one of these, Bill Cosby is an excellent example.
Something about the government retaliating over a private organizations poor security seems off putting... even if it is about the election. It is sad that showing the truth and what politicians say to moneyed interests behind closed doors is seen as a danger to our democracy.
Nepotism, basically. They might frame it as a national security issue, but I highly doubt they would do the same for any other political party.
It would probably be a very bad thing if the safe harbor provision of the DMCA was repealed. However we could stand to lose the anti circumvention provision and the no linking interpretation.
In both cases, trademarks and locations would be something they hold a monopoly on.
Correlation is not causation.
(1) he chose alternative treatments
(2) he died
(3) therefore...he might have died in the same amount of time, or died earlier, or died later with conventional cancer treatments
Absolutely false. Read the link I posted, specifically this bit:
The condition might have been nipped in the bud if Jobs had acted right away. Jobs's cancer manifest in neuroendocrine tumors, which are typically far less lethal than the "pancreatic adenocarcinoma" that make up 95 percent of pancreatic cancer cases. Amri said neuroendocrine tumors are so "mild" that...
"In my series of patients, for many subtypes, the survival rate was as high as 100% over a decade...
However he figured alternative medicine is better and tried some stupid hippie vegetarian diet thinking it would work, and needless to say it didn't.
Jobs ultimately had a liver transplant, which meant that he gave it a TON of time to metastasize rather than having it removed.
It was his own fault.
http://gawker.com/5849543/harv...
Every business is invariably going to have a monopoly on something, especially when it comes to copyrighted works and patents, which are that way by design. Android is a mix of both.
As for whether Google has an overall market monopoly, yeah they likely do for web search (and smartphone platforms in most overseas markets, but not in the US.) However unlike what most people know as monopolies, there really isn't anything compelling end users to switch to it other than they just want to. And in the case of Windows at least, that requires the end user to actually go out of their way to do so, and there's no tie ins or anything like that compelling them other than they just prefer it over the competition. Sure, if you install chrome it defaults to Google search, but consider that on a default windows install if you open edge/IE and type in "download chrome", Microsoft's bing throws up a javascript overlay practically begging the end user to not do it, and yet it seems that most of them do it anyways.
Apple still makes features exclusive for its newer hardware. For example, when Siri came out, it would only turn on for newer devices, but people with jailbroken phones were still able to make it work anyways without any apparent issues.
Just because you don't understand the context, doesn't mean the debate doesn't exist. As is obvious from the content, it has nothing to do with Trump
Are you high? Here, let me quote it for you:
Desperate Donald, there's no point...in submitting posts as an AC. We all recognize your style, roll our eyes at the bigoted and desperate moron, then we move along.
I honestly doubt Trump gives a shit about slashdot, so you'd have to explain better how it's relevant in any context. Furthermore, some AC posts are pretty good, and sometimes there are good reasons for regular users to post as AC. I recall one time a self confessed pedophile posted as AC to explain that even though he was attracted to children, he had never attempted to have sex with one, which if you ask me is a sane thing to do because it doesn't matter whether or not one abuses children, if they confess to even thinking about that then their life is pretty much over, and for no good reason.
Hell, I've posted as AC myself to make some decidedly un-PC jokes that I just don't want associated with my regular identity here. And you know what? There's nothing wrong with that. Sure, some twats get offended, but that's their problem, especially the times when those posts get modded +5 funny.
You do know that there were dozens of more advanced routing prototocols developed in between the IP being created and the internet becoming mainstream right ? The most common was X.25 - and frankly if an X.25 network was the Mona Lisa then IP was the drawing on your fridge that your 3-year old did in crayon.
Either you're joking or you're on crack. If you reversed your logic (i.e. calling x.25 inferior) it would make a LOT more sense. X.25 has basically no modularity whatsoever, and in fact was created before the OSI model was even a thing, which means that the number of things you can use it for and its overall scalability is shit. X.25 furthermore isn't at all analogous to IP because the whole thing much more closely resembles a layer 2 protocol, only it happens to specify some details that would in today's terms be considered layers 1 an d3. Also, because X.25 specifies what the physical layer looks like (which was unreliable as hell) the vast majority of the specification is all about error correction. It's also for this reason that it's slow as shit.
In fact, you know what technology replaced X.25? Frame relay. And frame relay was considered slow, so it was later replaced by MOE and MPLS.
All those massive privately owned large-scale networks (mostly country-wide) which prolifirated in the 1980s under various governments and corporations had their own routing protocols, most made IP look primitive.
IP probably looks primitive to you because, unlike everything else you mentioned, it only has one purpose: Facilitating the transfer of information between networks. That's it. Everything else is handled elsewhere in the OSI model. In fact if you care to notice, IPv6 is even less complex than IPv4. The simplicity is an advantage, not a drawback.
It may sound insurmountable to build an entirely new network on the same cables that replaces the internet with something better but it really isn't
Dude you really have no idea what the fuck you're even talking about. I shouldn't have even bothered replying the second I saw you advocate X.25 as being somehow superior, but I had already typed it by the time I read this.
How can you possibly argue that I don't have anything? In terms of global incomes, I'm in the top 0.1% of income earners. I buy shit all the time on Amazon that, at the end of the day, I don't really need. Factory workers in China that work 16 hour days don't have even an eighth of the shit that I have. Granted they take much longer work vacations than I do, their hourly rate is much lower.
an economy that's fscking over the middle class and making them pay for everything
I think I fit the definition of the middle class (between my job and the rent I collect I make just north of $80k/year) and I don't feel like I am being made to "pay for everything", nor do I feel like I'm being fucked over in any way. The top 1% income earners pay 50% of all of the federal income taxes, and the bottom 80% (which I'm part of) barely pay 15%, so please do explain why you think I'm getting fucked over and/or how I am being made to "pay for everything."
In other words, she's an IRL Cercei Lannister?
It scares the crap out of me that here on Slashdot, a site with presumably smart people like engineers and programmers, so many people are defending and rooting for Donald Trump.
The post you replied to doesn't appear to be doing that. Though GGGP posts may have been, they were done by ACs, which could very well be the same ACs that post GNAA spam.
Besides, ones intelligence isn't inherently going to make them favor a particular candidate. That, and to be honest I think the whole presidential race is stupid anyways.
The thing is, *every* other web browser, including shitty IE, renders google maps really smoothly, except firefox. I've checked, all of the acceleration stuff is enabled.
Ok, come up with one then.
Personally, I don't think it would be possible without sacrificing speed in a really bad way. You wouldn't be able to rely on things like summary routes, which means backbone routers would be considerably slower under the weight of much bigger and more complex routing tables (which also means that you probably couldn't rely on ASICs being practical either.) You probably couldn't rely on the existing prefix length (ipv6) or subnet mask (ipv4) system at all (which uses dead simple AND operations to calculate packet destinations.) You'd also by necessity have to go through a network discovery period, likely even on the client side like TOR has to do, each time you need to connect to a host.