Why is this a strategy? Why are they doing this? Because they want the best code? Or because they want the best design? Is the result only dependant on the coders?
And whose fault is that? One can wonder why a single person is so hard to miss. Is he the only sane person or is everyone else fighting with each other? Two sides of the medallion.
Some people do not have the talent to create a class... They can change one, understand an existing one, but not create one. I work with several of these people. They lack creativity.
Yes really. So you fired 5 and hired 5 new ones. Either another few of the 95 remaing are bad too or your new hires are bad. Because next year you are about to fire from that pool.
Unless you say that 5% of the people turn bad by themselves every year.
And it really does not matter who pays for healthcare (or any other common cost post), whichever is more efficient. Taxes are bad only when it hides a government which is (more) inefficient (than businesses).
Ah... And fwiw also owned by Dice (when I looked into it). As far as I know there has always been a difference, per project, on how much hosting actually took place on SourceForge.
I am most interested in finding good stuff. Anyone can host a tgz.
There does not seem to be a comprehensive list of possible services a *aaS system may fulfill and risks that its service may be interrupted. To just mention the performance and testplatform risk does not really cut it.
So you do not really care about privacy, wether it be government (yours or others) or organised crime.
Privacy is a requirement for personal safety. Wether it is financial, physical or psychological safety. You give up your safety too easily and think it does not matter. I am fine with the first (for now) but not the second.
Slashdot Mirror
Why is this a strategy? Why are they doing this? Because they want the best code? Or because they want the best design? Is the result only dependant on the coders?
None, if you want proof of it.
And whose fault is that? One can wonder why a single person is so hard to miss. Is he the only sane person or is everyone else fighting with each other? Two sides of the medallion.
If I want to be near hot air I would be flying gliders in Australia instead of listening to marketing BS.
It is like a facial captcha, I guess.
I am missing checksums to verify the download. It seems sourceforge has the tendency to change stuff.
this...
Some people do not have the talent to create a class... They can change one, understand an existing one, but not create one. I work with several of these people. They lack creativity.
Oh, but that is my buddy you need to talk to... please hold.
Certificates change because they expire, too.
I did not dive into the subject, but how is it idifficult to run a few dns servers?
Yes really. So you fired 5 and hired 5 new ones. Either another few of the 95 remaing are bad too or your new hires are bad. Because next year you are about to fire from that pool.
Unless you say that 5% of the people turn bad by themselves every year.
The analogy is quite striking: There is no external goal, with meaning, that they can achieve. Ergo: There is no vision or ambition for the future.
And it really does not matter who pays for healthcare (or any other common cost post), whichever is more efficient. Taxes are bad only when it hides a government which is (more) inefficient (than businesses).
He should have installed a firewall.
Ah... And fwiw also owned by Dice (when I looked into it). As far as I know there has always been a difference, per project, on how much hosting actually took place on SourceForge.
I am most interested in finding good stuff. Anyone can host a tgz.
Funny how it is missing Freshmeat.net / Freecode.com.
Is one not allowed to show his opinion? And you conclude that to be it?
There are other means of learning than by trial-and-error.
There does not seem to be a comprehensive list of possible services a *aaS system may fulfill and risks that its service may be interrupted. To just mention the performance and testplatform risk does not really cut it.
Oh, you want a hard sell [Citation given]?
Yet your logic does not work very wel and is therefore falsified. Find a new theorem. Politician.
Darwinawards.com is always looking for new members.
And no website wants $1 when they can get $2. This is not about costs, it is about companies wanting to make profit.
So you do not really care about privacy, wether it be government (yours or others) or organised crime.
Privacy is a requirement for personal safety. Wether it is financial, physical or psychological safety. You give up your safety too easily and think it does not matter. I am fine with the first (for now) but not the second.
searchterms: why privacy matters