You're either being deliberately obtuse or intellectually dishonest. Premiums have increased every. single. year. since its inception and have more than doubled since 2013. So, sure, "bro," whatever.
No trolling here! My point is that "hate speech," as currently defined, is little more than a toddler-like mentality that says "I don't like it so it should be banned." I'm not saying that people don't say hateful things. I'm saying that if you agree with banning speech that you disagree with, then you stand against the first amendment.
And when the intelligensia become the fascists? People will see through that bullshit (and are), want to stop subsidizing it via taxes, and be called anti-intellectuals for their trouble.
It's hilarious to see the people who say "the U.S. military can't be stopped!" are the same ones who will also say "the military suxors, they haven't won a war since the 40's!"
Slashdot Mirror
I'm told that the applicable Woke Rule is "healthy at any size!" This is separate from the "obesity crisis" because shut up.
Considering what's taught in colleges and the circus that was the latest SCOTUS confirmation, he's not far wrong.
Did they also have Pac-Man stop to ask why the ghosts hated him?
"Aw, fuck it, let's be evil."
The plaintiffs are also concerned Trump might use the alerts to spread disinformation because IPAWS doesn't regulate the content of the messages.
Sounds like they're asking for prior restraint, something that the courts frown quite deeply upon.
Sounds like Rep. Johnson was on (to) something!
Just as "Comcast" is now "Xfinity" and for much the same reason.
The video is pretty widely available; just because Breitbart has it doesn't mean it's not real.
To me, "ends" means the nice crispy bits from a smoked piece of brisket.
This is exactly why Trump's election was a surprise. A majority of his voters stayed silent because they didn't want to be harassed or lose their job.
If you listen to feminists about how frail and fragile women are, you'd think they were arguing for the patriarchy.
You're either being deliberately obtuse or intellectually dishonest. Premiums have increased every. single. year. since its inception and have more than doubled since 2013. So, sure, "bro," whatever.
Kinda like how all of the major hikes in the ACA were timed to happen a month or two after elections. Weird.
We punish those who commit abuses. We tend to not ban things that can be abused.
Searching camera feeds based on physical human traits. Quelle horror.
Am I the only one who initially read that as "Thanos"?
You fool! It's only bad when Americans hunt cute furry things or choose humans over animals.
About a sixth of the "good" that People Who Are Better Than You do.
"Everything within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state." --Benito Mussolini
No trolling here! My point is that "hate speech," as currently defined, is little more than a toddler-like mentality that says "I don't like it so it should be banned." I'm not saying that people don't say hateful things. I'm saying that if you agree with banning speech that you disagree with, then you stand against the first amendment.
How do you catch something that doesn't exist?
And when the intelligensia become the fascists? People will see through that bullshit (and are), want to stop subsidizing it via taxes, and be called anti-intellectuals for their trouble.
Yeah! Just like how we sue Honda for drunk drivers! Oh wait...
It's hilarious to see the people who say "the U.S. military can't be stopped!" are the same ones who will also say "the military suxors, they haven't won a war since the 40's!"
...founding fathers of a number of allies, such as South Africa.
Who, coincidentally enough, is going through a simultaneous gun confiscation and land grab.