Problem with Zope is that it's often installed behind Apache which serves as proxy/urlrewriter and so Netcraft may only see Apache some times. (it correctly detects Zope for my own website though)
For a time, at least, your software was modified to not use jaxml (my GPLed module) anymore, which is one of the solutions I indicated to your licensing officer. This is good behaviour, but it took a long time. Telling the contrary as you do above is a lie.
I'll double check that this is still the case.
As stated in the GPL, you're perfectly free to use your software internally if it uses my GPLed module.
People you redistribute your module to, are not allowed to link to my module, so your software can't run unless you modify it to not use my work anymore. That's all and that's very simple to understand.
Also if you really are the original author of the incriminated software, which I can't tell because you're anonymous here, I never received any answer from you but from both the licensing officer of UCSD and from a staff member who told me exactly "I'm not the author (that's XX YYY who has since graduated and pretty much disappeared)". Replace XX YYY with your own name, or ask me privately for the original thread if you're in doubt.
UCSD violated the GPL license and my copyrights on the jaxml Pyhon module during ten months. It was very difficult for me to make them comply, which they finally did.
> for if you do a good job and shrink your > expenditure, your budgets get cut, whilst habitual > overspenders get their budgets increased. Crazy, > huh?
> For most projects, such part-time distributed work > would be very hard to coordinate; the > independently-written parts would not work > together.
> Is this not what GNU started? Many projects > with part-time distributed workers? This is a > quote from RMS, stating that the development > model most open source projects now use would > be very difficult.
Not at all ! If you'd read below, he says that this problem is absent if people want to rewrite Unix this way, because all the interfaces are well known and so distributed work is doable.
Their behavior is not the one of the majority of people, that's all. Anyone is "mentally ill" if you choose the observer carefully.
Are they right or wrong ? Do they choose to live homeless or not ? Do they suffer from "real" physical/physiological problems ? Or are they only "different" ?
I thought we only "tattooed" pets, prisoners, jews, slaves, and now people who are/live "different".
What stupid people do you have at your top, who repeat history again and again without even noticing...
> Is this going to chase away companies adopting > Linux for use with their products?
If this is true, then it's not about companies adopting GNU/Linux for use with their products. Instead it's about companies stealing others' work and claiming its theirs. I don't think we will miss them if companies like this go away, or bankrupt.
Not "courriel polluant". In French, it's usually "Pourriel" which is a mix of "Pourri" (rotten), "Courriel" (email), and "Electronique" (electronic).
And "Pourriel" is really good IMHFO (In My Humble French Opinion).
At least it's better than the horrible "Tourne disque" they wanted us to use instead of "Disque dur" (which is the word-for-word correct translation of 'Hard Disk')
1 - Was already the case before with NT 2 - Web apps ? What is new with this ? 3 - You are joking. Nothing to do with.Net or thing s like that. It only depends on the TCP/IP (ICMP) protocol implementation, not on what is "above" the kernel 4 - Whoohoo ! 5 - Any link to a report with real numbers ?
Some impressive stats were posted to the mailing list.
It's main feature is that it's completely maintainance free, and that even dumb people can use it (I know, I am).
My personnal stats are 2 false positives actually (one from PayPal, one from a company I work with), 280 spams learnt (I told it they were spam), 2877 spam catched and 4354 innocent.
Slashdot Mirror
He, maybe B) is the result of A) and him having finally found his nose !
Problem with Zope is that it's often installed behind Apache which serves as proxy/urlrewriter and so Netcraft may only see Apache some times. (it correctly detects Zope for my own website though)
For a time, at least, your software was modified to not use jaxml (my GPLed module) anymore, which is one of the solutions I indicated to your licensing officer. This is good behaviour, but it took a long time. Telling the contrary as you do above is a lie.
I'll double check that this is still the case.
As stated in the GPL, you're perfectly free to use your software internally if it uses my GPLed module.
People you redistribute your module to, are not allowed to link to my module, so your software can't run unless you modify it to not use my work anymore. That's all and that's very simple to understand.
Also if you really are the original author of the incriminated software, which I can't tell because you're anonymous here, I never received any answer from you but from both the licensing officer of UCSD and from a staff member who told me exactly "I'm not the author (that's XX YYY who has since graduated and pretty much disappeared)". Replace XX YYY with your own name, or ask me privately for the original thread if you're in doubt.
Thank you for reading, anyway.
Really great novel !
Thanks for the link.
> This last effort could lead to the eTRON chip
etron in French means shit.
reading the article is more funny now, isn't it ?
The fact is that I had no problem (at all) with the developpers, but with the licensing officer !
I understand your point of view anyway.
UCSD violated the GPL license and my copyrights on the jaxml Pyhon module during ten months. It was very difficult for me to make them comply, which they finally did.
They suck !
> for if you do a good job and shrink your
> expenditure, your budgets get cut, whilst habitual
> overspenders get their budgets increased. Crazy,
> huh?
Not crazy at all. It's just like in France !
There : http://www.stallman.org/rms.jpg
Yes weare. It will take some more time, that's all.
> For most projects, such part-time distributed work
> would be very hard to coordinate; the
> independently-written parts would not work
> together.
> Is this not what GNU started? Many projects
> with part-time distributed workers? This is a
> quote from RMS, stating that the development
> model most open source projects now use would
> be very difficult.
Not at all ! If you'd read below, he says that this problem is absent if people want to rewrite Unix this way, because all the interfaces are well known and so distributed work is doable.
How large is this in Libraries of Congress ?
No, it's there :-)
> I'm sure that HP has the right infrastructure and
> skills to do this job right
Yes they have. But they probably also have a good contract with some company which prevents them from doing exactly that.
try ReportLab from http://www.reportlab.com
It's a Python library to generate PDF files.
I think I've seen some support for barcodes there.
Thanks to all for the explanations !
I meant that ionic propulsion is not a solution to send people there if the ones who got there 30 years ago had a three days trip...
But I'm not a rocket scientist
Is the "15 months" trip due to the ionic propulsion method ?
I believed that "traditionnal" engines could send people on the moon in two days.
Anyone can explain ?
Just send them this :
http://www.smellypoop.com
"mental illness" means NOTHING especially here.
Their behavior is not the one of the majority of people, that's all. Anyone is "mentally ill" if you choose the observer carefully.
Are they right or wrong ?
Do they choose to live homeless or not ?
Do they suffer from "real" physical/physiological problems ?
Or are they only "different" ?
I thought we only "tattooed" pets, prisoners, jews, slaves, and now people who are/live "different".
What stupid people do you have at your top, who repeat history again and again without even noticing...
> Is this going to chase away companies adopting
> Linux for use with their products?
If this is true, then it's not about companies adopting GNU/Linux for use with their products. Instead it's about companies stealing others' work and claiming its theirs. I don't think we will miss them if companies like this go away, or bankrupt.
Not "courriel polluant". In French, it's usually "Pourriel" which is a mix of "Pourri" (rotten), "Courriel" (email), and "Electronique" (electronic).
And "Pourriel" is really good IMHFO (In My Humble French Opinion).
At least it's better than the horrible "Tourne disque" they wanted us to use instead of "Disque dur" (which is the word-for-word correct translation of 'Hard Disk')
1 - Was already the case before with NT .Net or thing s like that. It only depends on the TCP/IP (ICMP) protocol implementation, not on what is "above" the kernel
2 - Web apps ? What is new with this ?
3 - You are joking. Nothing to do with
4 - Whoohoo !
5 - Any link to a report with real numbers ?
Dspam (http://www.networkdweebs.com) rocks !
Some impressive stats were posted to the mailing list.
It's main feature is that it's completely maintainance free, and that even dumb people can use it (I know, I am).
My personnal stats are 2 false positives actually (one from PayPal, one from a company I work with), 280 spams learnt (I told it they were spam), 2877 spam catched and 4354 innocent.
I guess this was on purpose, but maybe I'm wrong...