Threats are a dime-a-dozen and no one takes them seriously.
What works is to get an actual lawyer to compose an email that actually originates from the law firm and/or send snail mail, on law firm letterhead, explaining why the scammer is suspect and asking for clarification.
Ask slashdot is turning into a basic support forum....
This thread is not "basic." I'm having random issues at work where "freemails" are just not making it to us and the comments here are teaching me much.
And, I have been working with email ever since Moby Dick was a minnow and stuff.
I have never had to work with Comcast, but what I do is call and tell the script reader that, "Yo... Bill said call here and tell you to escalate my problem." When they ask who Bill is, I just say, "Dunno, but I just spent 2 hours with him and he said call you and tell you it has to be escalated."
The banks are not the point of contact for the consumer... the retailer is. Banks AND retailers want the retailer to bear the cost so the retailer can pass it on to the consumer.
Consumers, in one form or another, will be responsible for breaches.
I work for a law firm and this will not work.
Threats are a dime-a-dozen and no one takes them seriously.
What works is to get an actual lawyer to compose an email that actually originates from the law firm and/or send snail mail, on law firm letterhead, explaining why the scammer is suspect and asking for clarification.
... with a wet squirrel than
Read the rest of this comment...
... when he launders his hand after taking a wee wee.
Snowden.
It's an asshole comment.
Ask slashdot is turning into a basic support forum....
This thread is not "basic." I'm having random issues at work where "freemails" are just not making it to us and the comments here are teaching me much.
And, I have been working with email ever since Moby Dick was a minnow and stuff.
I sure would be interested in reading Bennet's thoughts on this, especially if it were a 17 long paragraphs and stuff.
I have never had to work with Comcast, but what I do is call and tell the script reader that, "Yo ... Bill said call here and tell you to escalate my problem." When they ask who Bill is, I just say, "Dunno, but I just spent 2 hours with him and he said call you and tell you it has to be escalated."
Sometimes it works and stuff.
This.
Want some real fun?
Google, "support number for (gmail, or hotmail, or yahoo)" and get scammed.
I use Hosted Exchange Service and mail is weird sometimes with "freemail."
My solution is to tell management to tell their buddies to use the email that their ISP gave them.
Hell, AOL doesn't even bother sending bounce notices. Smart move, actually, because bounce message are a sink that provides zero income.
Right here:
"Exposing" communications isn't illegal.
So he can come on home, right?
I'm sorry, but you guys and gals are missing it.
Customers don't have the control panel.
This is carrier-side.
Be sure to tell Snowden.
DuPont does.
It's well known that you don't EVEN know that.
It's just as secure as everything else.
And more secure than the USPS VPN, certainly.
We had one back in the 1860s and that didn't update the VPNs and stuff.
I post a lot and read a lot so I'm posting this for you to read:
Get fucked.
... patch later.
This.
Law firm emails are protected by attorney–client privilege and medical emails are protected by HIPAA, for instance.
For another entity to expose those communications should fall under FCC jurisdiction.
Maybe it's an oxymoron.
Aren't you over this charade ...
Said the AC.
You're why the article is relevant.
Thanks for playing.
... I saw that on Amazing Race way before I saw this article.
I think we know who has dibs on GNOME.
The banks are not the point of contact for the consumer ... the retailer is. Banks AND retailers want the retailer to bear the cost so the retailer can pass it on to the consumer.
Consumers, in one form or another, will be responsible for breaches.
Not every early voyager.
Some couldn't return and expect to survive it.