We do not know the name, but it was not a guy. It was a gal.
She languished at the encampment, be it hut or cave, as the seasons came and went, and had access to a varying amount of small objects.
As she laboured in her primitive lab, she had the intelligence, experience, opportunity and motive to experiment with combinations of adaptations and stumbled, early on, upon the idea that rolling was more efficient than dragging or pulling.
I use FF in private window, using DuckDuckGo as the search engine, and FF is loaded up with NoScript, uBlock Origin, AdBlock, Facebook Container, NoMiner.
--
I religiously perform the following steps before and after using FF:
In most cases, the operators were aware that the unit was upset and made adjustments.
In several cases, the alarm was for very serious conditions.
Safety measures/guards/alarms exist because of human learning.
We didn't have false positives.
We had operators who were inconvenienced, much like the persons who will not practice due diligence by keeping their goddam hands on the steering wheel, even when warned to do so.
The operators stuffed red rags into the alarm horns and, sure enough, 8 people died on a unit where instruments showed there was sufficient time to get out of harm's way had the sound not been muffled.
I remember my dad pulling the wire of the "ding, ding," of the lap belt warning.
People take batteries out of smoke detectors.
I think the answer is for the goddam artificial intelligence to be fucking intelligent.
Until then, don't beta test the goddam thing in production.
Since then, [Trump's tariffs] many economists have publicly disagreed that raising tariffs so sharply will improve the economy, as Trump asserts it will. In particular, experts have pointed to the failure of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act, passed in June 1930, to protect U.S. industries with tariff increases.
Slashdot Mirror
Why?
One reason is enough, isn't it?
More reasons would only reinforce the one.
Bell curves have two "wrong ends," if we define "wrong," as the fringes at some distance from the peak, or "norm."
More actually, Christians do not worship Jesus.
Jesus himself, like Muhammad, forbade it.
That explains the Muslim prohibition of paraphernalia relating to his likeness and the use of the name, Allah.
That also explains the phrase, "In Jesus' name , we pray."
I can testify to this:
I was tickled pink when my firewalls embraced Linux.
Windows shops are goddam near impossible to protect from the bad nasties and, configured properly, Linux continued to become hardened over time.
Exactly.
And just how hard is it for mankind to make a fucking ball cap?
That was certainly achieved well before the wheel.
The brand names proposed above refer to TYRES, not wheels.
The brand, "Boring," applied to an invention preceding the wheel by millennia, is an idea that's slicker'n deer guts on a door knob.
We do not know the name, but it was not a guy. It was a gal.
She languished at the encampment, be it hut or cave, as the seasons came and went, and had access to a varying amount of small objects.
As she laboured in her primitive lab, she had the intelligence, experience, opportunity and motive to experiment with combinations of adaptations and stumbled, early on, upon the idea that rolling was more efficient than dragging or pulling.
The spectra you are alluding to are two dimensional along an x-y axis, in a bell curve that does not support your negativity.
People jumped from the God of Abraham to prophets Jesus and Mohamed and it isn't going well, so there's a precedent of the United States and stuff.
And Al Gore rhythm?
He, and guilty feet, ain't got no rhythm.
Google wants to be a bitch, too.
Data prostitution pays well.
If you have credentials, please present them.
WHO is including all of the planet.
Most children ...
Where did you get data on more than 50% of the children on the planet?
How do your findings include children without parents?
What does your study say adult gaming addiction?
Also, role playing is actually a way to teach.
Role models do it all the time.
Warner is not a startup with little brand recognition.
That same, "Think of the exposure," defense didn't work with the Disney franchise, either.
You and I are in agreement on that.
My goal is to separate that from aggressive, proactive cyber attacks on the part of the US.
They can't do that.
And my point is: While the US sucks the big one on hacking, they are also lousy gatekeepers.
It's incompetence all the way down.
I use FF in private window, using DuckDuckGo as the search engine, and FF is loaded up with NoScript, uBlock Origin, AdBlock, Facebook Container, NoMiner.
--
I religiously perform the following steps before and after using FF:
I run a batch file with the following commands ...
--
taskkill /f /im iexplore.exe /f /im firefox.exe /f /im chrome.exe /f /im MicrosoftEdge.exe /f /im MicrosoftEdgeCP.exe /auto
taskkill
taskkill
taskkill
taskkill
RunDll32.exe InetCpl.cpl,ClearMyTracksByProcess 4351
cd\
cd C:\Program Files\CCleaner
ccleaner
exit
--
I have CCleaner remove everything, including all cookies.
Then I run ATF-Cleaner.
My expertise with TOR is torrible.
In an experiment, I used the Tor browser to log in to a burner Facebook account and those bastards downed it handsomely.
They wanted phone numbers, photo-ID, and that shit.
Also I got geoblocks at some sites. "This content is not available in your country."
Tor is great for porn sites, nut it's slow.
That's leaks , not cyber attack.
Pay attention.
Your example highlights incompetency.
Additionally, hackers extant to the US have grabbed the good shit crom CIA and NSA, right?
No.
I was an instrumntman there.
In most cases, the operators were aware that the unit was upset and made adjustments.
In several cases, the alarm was for very serious conditions.
Safety measures/guards/alarms exist because of human learning.
We didn't have false positives.
We had operators who were inconvenienced, much like the persons who will not practice due diligence by keeping their goddam hands on the steering wheel, even when warned to do so.
We did have
How's that working for the ex-Google employees who refused to work on gubmint programs?
Been there.
Texaco refinery, Port Arthur, Texas.
The operators stuffed red rags into the alarm horns and, sure enough, 8 people died on a unit where instruments showed there was sufficient time to get out of harm's way had the sound not been muffled.
I remember my dad pulling the wire of the "ding, ding," of the lap belt warning.
People take batteries out of smoke detectors.
I think the answer is for the goddam artificial intelligence to be fucking intelligent.
Until then, don't beta test the goddam thing in production.
... can't get rid of Kaspersky.
US Government Can't Get Controversial Kaspersky Lab Software Off Its Networks
... than what?
We hear about Russia, China, Ukraine ...
What has the US ever done?
... that would take science and money.
Sorry.
Since then, [Trump's tariffs] many economists have publicly disagreed that raising tariffs so sharply will improve the economy, as Trump asserts it will. In particular, experts have pointed to the failure of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act, passed in June 1930, to protect U.S. industries with tariff increases.
... patented the method.
Then SCOTUS would have us pay royalties.
But titties on babies.