The cat woman is irrelevant. Can't get that through your head, can you? Whether she has a mental condition or not makes no difference. The point is (and again, stop trying to change the topic like a little boy caught with their hand in a cookie jar) you refuse to call Chelsea Manning by her legal name. Your excuse is stupid - "That's how I first knew him." That's the same excuse rednecks use to keep calling black people niggers - "That's how I first knew them."
I'm left eye dominant while being right handed,
Big shit. There are plenty of people who are left-handed, but right eye dominant. Like me. I don't consider that a problem.
As for the presumption of you being a man, women generally don't have much of a problem with transsexuals. It's a "guy" thing. Studies have shown in court that the men who most strongly resist anything outside the male sex/female sex divide are, deep down, repressed gays. Like you. You doth protest too much.
So, keep on being like the racists who insist on calling black people names, because to a transsexual it's the same damn thing. In the end, it doesn't matter, because you'll never meet me, and if you do, and you insist on publicly misgendering me, I will have you before the courts like I did 2 other times. You see, your opinion doesn't matter - you can tell it to the judge, you'll still lose, just like they did. The only exception the next time is I'm going to collect my $20k moral damages, just like others have done, instead of just a public apology. Time for bigots like you to pay up or shut up.
Well, if you really want to give the system a really hard shock, how else are you going to do it? Clinton will be 8 more years of more of the same (do you really want another Reagan-style president who can't remember what's going on in meetings?) Trump is an ass, but 4 years of the stupidity he'll bring might make voters actually get involved. It's not like he can do more damage than Bush 2 did.
Why would anyone with more than 1 brain cell not do some research before visiting a campus?
Now, the faculty were in on the scam, so why aren't the students suing their teachers asses for fraud?
They sought out people who thought that this was their only option,” a former Charlotte campus faculty member says. "[The students] were really trying to make a difference in their lives and trying to make a difference in their families lives," she says, adding that the campus reps saw them as "cash cows".
By the time most students realized how bad ITT was, it was too late. "The credits that they earned couldn’t be transferred anywhere," she explains. "They were stuck. They needed to graduate. It worked out for some people, and they were able to move on. But they were some of the few." (According to a 2012 Senate investigation of ITT, about 52 percent of students who enrolled in 2008 dropped out by 2010.) "I know a con when I see one."
You could not work there and not be aware that you were part of the scam. RICO for everyone involved. Sending 1,000 faculty to jail will send a message to the other crappy diploma mill scams, as well as alert the pubic, which seems to be sleepwalking.
Maybe being a little bit crazy is the only way. Khrushchev didn't bang his shoe on the podium - it was slipped to him in a paper bag. But everyone was so worried, thinking that the crazy russians might actually launch if given provocation, that it didn't happen. The US thought russia and tons of missiles when they only had 6. With only 6, and no crazy man at the helm, what do you think would have happened?
It's been going on for a lot more than 40 years. However, look at the decisions that have been made. You don't promote peace by giving arms to both sides so they can kill each other.
Not the best choice? Neither candidate is trustworthy, but Trump hasn't gotten a good portion of the world mired in failed countries at war. When it comes to war, Hillary is probably to the right of any previous president, including W.
If you have x86 code that works, but the customers now need it in a smaller form factor, there's two choices - use this, or spend time porting to arm, testing, debugging, etc. It may be cheaper overall to just use the old code, and it's certainly faster. This would also buy you time to port the code while still taking care of immediate customers, if there is sufficient demand. Code is not going to port itself.
No, your definition is too easily manipulated. If you pay 3 times what a company is worth, you don't suddenly create goodwill equal to 2/3 of all the company's value. Goodwill cannot be inflated that way to make a business worth more than it is. If the company sells off all it's assets the next day, it's not still worth 2x what was paid. Such accounting tricks will get you in trouble. You buy a business and it turns to crap the same day, you have to take a charge for impaired goodwill.
Um, no. 20%. You would get 25% if it were in the ascending direction.
Lets round if off. From $10 to $8, you subtract 1/5 (20%) of the value of $10. $10 divided by 5 = $20%. 10 - $2 (or 20% of the original $10 price) leaves $8.
Neither would I, but people were saying "It can't run Windows 10" when it says right in the title that it can.
BTW, Windows IoT core also runs on x86 hardware, as well as Pi 2 &3, MinnowMax, and Dragonboard. Headless requires 256 meg ram, double with a display. 400mhz and up cpu.
Again, bullshit. I checked yet again, and ALL Up1 stock on their web site (the link is in the article) is sold out, including the blue and the -orangey-red.
There might still be some left elsewhere, such as Amazon. You would have known this if you had actually clicked through to read the article, because it gives Amazon as an example of where there might still be some left in the channel, but that doesn't change the fact that Jawbone's online store has NO Up1 for sale.
Keeping stock on hand is part of customer service. That has both a cost and a value. It makes up part of the value of good will that's on the books. Crappy service impairs the value of that good will, forcing the business to write down a portion of it, and possibly triggering loan covenants.
And if they know the value is impaired and don't write it down, they can have their ass sued off by investors, especially those who buy shares after it should have been written down. The SEC doesn't like companies not disclosing their true financial condition to investors.
Uber has a lot more cash to draw down on. At the last round of funding, Jawbone and the investors settled on a total value of the company of $1.5 billion, so there's only $500 million left to issue stock against. This is not speculation, it's fact - numbers anyone can run in their heed. When valuation stood at $3.3 billion, there was much more margin ($1.8 billion in all) left to play with and issue equity against.
Am I an investor? Ha - I don't gamble, so no. Maybe you are one of their shills, trying to keep the value from going down even further. I wonder if some of those loans they got were conditional on the value of the company. That's how banks do it even for long-established profitable businesses.
Much smaller form factor while maintaining x86-64 compatibility. You wouldn't want to stuff your laptop into an access point. Too damn big. A TV? probably not. Just adds weight and complexity and power draw and cost and maybe putting the whole device over the edge in terms of passive heat dispersion, so needing a fan like those DLP TVs. Noisy buggers.
Both the UK and Israel have passed laws allowing it. No politician has been jailed over this. Both France and Canada tried to pass laws revoking citizenship from dual nationals, and there's no legal reason at the UN level why it can't be done if the person isn't left stateless (ie. they have citizenship elsewhere).
Also, there's no such thing as laws that are perfectly natural. And what the law giveth in the big print, it frequently taketh away in the small print, so there's legal precedent that laws can be conditional, because the vast majority of the time, they have conditions attached. By extension, that would include the laws granting citizenship if a country so decides, because a country is sovereign with respect to its' laws.
Obviously if it's not in the constitution, it's not a constitutional right. Just ask the slaves before the 13th amendment. The very beginning doesn't say citizens or persons, it says
we hold these truths to be self-evident,that all men are created equal
Very easy to argue that if they had wanted to include women, they would have said so, especially since women were not considered equal in many ways, including voting, same as they had to add the 13th amendment because "all men" wasn't necessarily meaning "including blacks, Asians, or native Americans, or a whole bunch of other people.
It took the 19th Amendment just to guarantee the right for women to vote.
The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
If women had been included in the original, the 19th wouldn't have been necessary. And the 19th did not go beyond voting as far as constitutional guarantees are concerned. It would have been easy to take out the words "to vote" and have a clearer and broader constitutional right to equality.
You'd be wrong. If you thought about it, even nicotine manages to get into the bloodstream and through the blood-brain barrier. If the various toxins didn't get elsewhere in the body, it would be kind of hard for them to cause pancreas, bladder, kidney, cervix, and stomach cancer, and acute myeloid leukemia (bone marrow cancer), or to show up in the urine.
Reaching for the lawyer's number would appear, n this case, somewhat justified
Why? You say every single one is in stock, and that you checked it yourself, which is easily verifiable (and I did). Besides, they're more likely to need a lawyer to help sell the business or do a prepackaged bankruptcy.
Its also why, you should probably have capable editors
How about capable trolls? You certainly don't fil the bill.
Slashdot Mirror
The cat woman is irrelevant. Can't get that through your head, can you? Whether she has a mental condition or not makes no difference. The point is (and again, stop trying to change the topic like a little boy caught with their hand in a cookie jar) you refuse to call Chelsea Manning by her legal name. Your excuse is stupid - "That's how I first knew him." That's the same excuse rednecks use to keep calling black people niggers - "That's how I first knew them."
I'm left eye dominant while being right handed,
Big shit. There are plenty of people who are left-handed, but right eye dominant. Like me. I don't consider that a problem.
As for the presumption of you being a man, women generally don't have much of a problem with transsexuals. It's a "guy" thing. Studies have shown in court that the men who most strongly resist anything outside the male sex/female sex divide are, deep down, repressed gays. Like you. You doth protest too much.
So, keep on being like the racists who insist on calling black people names, because to a transsexual it's the same damn thing. In the end, it doesn't matter, because you'll never meet me, and if you do, and you insist on publicly misgendering me, I will have you before the courts like I did 2 other times. You see, your opinion doesn't matter - you can tell it to the judge, you'll still lose, just like they did. The only exception the next time is I'm going to collect my $20k moral damages, just like others have done, instead of just a public apology. Time for bigots like you to pay up or shut up.
Well, if you really want to give the system a really hard shock, how else are you going to do it? Clinton will be 8 more years of more of the same (do you really want another Reagan-style president who can't remember what's going on in meetings?) Trump is an ass, but 4 years of the stupidity he'll bring might make voters actually get involved. It's not like he can do more damage than Bush 2 did.
If at least one student isn't being held back per class every year there's something wrong.
Why would anyone with more than 1 brain cell not do some research before visiting a campus?
Now, the faculty were in on the scam, so why aren't the students suing their teachers asses for fraud?
They sought out people who thought that this was their only option,” a former Charlotte campus faculty member says. "[The students] were really trying to make a difference in their lives and trying to make a difference in their families lives," she says, adding that the campus reps saw them as "cash cows".
By the time most students realized how bad ITT was, it was too late. "The credits that they earned couldn’t be transferred anywhere," she explains. "They were stuck. They needed to graduate. It worked out for some people, and they were able to move on. But they were some of the few." (According to a 2012 Senate investigation of ITT, about 52 percent of students who enrolled in 2008 dropped out by 2010.) "I know a con when I see one."
You could not work there and not be aware that you were part of the scam. RICO for everyone involved. Sending 1,000 faculty to jail will send a message to the other crappy diploma mill scams, as well as alert the pubic, which seems to be sleepwalking.
Maybe being a little bit crazy is the only way. Khrushchev didn't bang his shoe on the podium - it was slipped to him in a paper bag. But everyone was so worried, thinking that the crazy russians might actually launch if given provocation, that it didn't happen. The US thought russia and tons of missiles when they only had 6. With only 6, and no crazy man at the helm, what do you think would have happened?
It's been going on for a lot more than 40 years. However, look at the decisions that have been made. You don't promote peace by giving arms to both sides so they can kill each other.
Both sides do it. So what's your point?
Not the best choice? Neither candidate is trustworthy, but Trump hasn't gotten a good portion of the world mired in failed countries at war. When it comes to war, Hillary is probably to the right of any previous president, including W.
If you have x86 code that works, but the customers now need it in a smaller form factor, there's two choices - use this, or spend time porting to arm, testing, debugging, etc. It may be cheaper overall to just use the old code, and it's certainly faster. This would also buy you time to port the code while still taking care of immediate customers, if there is sufficient demand. Code is not going to port itself.
No, your definition is too easily manipulated. If you pay 3 times what a company is worth, you don't suddenly create goodwill equal to 2/3 of all the company's value. Goodwill cannot be inflated that way to make a business worth more than it is. If the company sells off all it's assets the next day, it's not still worth 2x what was paid. Such accounting tricks will get you in trouble. You buy a business and it turns to crap the same day, you have to take a charge for impaired goodwill.
She would set a precedent that would be useful elsewhere.
Um, no. 20%. You would get 25% if it were in the ascending direction.
Lets round if off. From $10 to $8, you subtract 1/5 (20%) of the value of $10. $10 divided by 5 = $20%. 10 - $2 (or 20% of the original $10 price) leaves $8.
How do I stop videos from playing automatically in my News Feed? I guess they were too stupid to search for "How do I stop videos from automatically playing on Facebook". Then again, they're on Facebook all the time, so ...
Up1 is NOT in stock. Stop lying. It's boring.
Neither would I, but people were saying "It can't run Windows 10" when it says right in the title that it can.
BTW, Windows IoT core also runs on x86 hardware, as well as Pi 2 &3, MinnowMax, and Dragonboard. Headless requires 256 meg ram, double with a display. 400mhz and up cpu.
Again, bullshit. I checked yet again, and ALL Up1 stock on their web site (the link is in the article) is sold out, including the blue and the -orangey-red.
There might still be some left elsewhere, such as Amazon. You would have known this if you had actually clicked through to read the article, because it gives Amazon as an example of where there might still be some left in the channel, but that doesn't change the fact that Jawbone's online store has NO Up1 for sale.
Keeping stock on hand is part of customer service. That has both a cost and a value. It makes up part of the value of good will that's on the books. Crappy service impairs the value of that good will, forcing the business to write down a portion of it, and possibly triggering loan covenants.
And if they know the value is impaired and don't write it down, they can have their ass sued off by investors, especially those who buy shares after it should have been written down. The SEC doesn't like companies not disclosing their true financial condition to investors.
Uber has a lot more cash to draw down on. At the last round of funding, Jawbone and the investors settled on a total value of the company of $1.5 billion, so there's only $500 million left to issue stock against. This is not speculation, it's fact - numbers anyone can run in their heed. When valuation stood at $3.3 billion, there was much more margin ($1.8 billion in all) left to play with and issue equity against.
Am I an investor? Ha - I don't gamble, so no. Maybe you are one of their shills, trying to keep the value from going down even further. I wonder if some of those loans they got were conditional on the value of the company. That's how banks do it even for long-established profitable businesses.
Much smaller form factor while maintaining x86-64 compatibility. You wouldn't want to stuff your laptop into an access point. Too damn big. A TV? probably not. Just adds weight and complexity and power draw and cost and maybe putting the whole device over the edge in terms of passive heat dispersion, so needing a fan like those DLP TVs. Noisy buggers.
Both the UK and Israel have passed laws allowing it. No politician has been jailed over this. Both France and Canada tried to pass laws revoking citizenship from dual nationals, and there's no legal reason at the UN level why it can't be done if the person isn't left stateless (ie. they have citizenship elsewhere).
Also, there's no such thing as laws that are perfectly natural. And what the law giveth in the big print, it frequently taketh away in the small print, so there's legal precedent that laws can be conditional, because the vast majority of the time, they have conditions attached. By extension, that would include the laws granting citizenship if a country so decides, because a country is sovereign with respect to its' laws.
we hold these truths to be self-evident,that all men are created equal
Very easy to argue that if they had wanted to include women, they would have said so, especially since women were not considered equal in many ways, including voting, same as they had to add the 13th amendment because "all men" wasn't necessarily meaning "including blacks, Asians, or native Americans, or a whole bunch of other people.
It took the 19th Amendment just to guarantee the right for women to vote.
The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
If women had been included in the original, the 19th wouldn't have been necessary. And the 19th did not go beyond voting as far as constitutional guarantees are concerned. It would have been easy to take out the words "to vote" and have a clearer and broader constitutional right to equality.
You'd be wrong. If you thought about it, even nicotine manages to get into the bloodstream and through the blood-brain barrier. If the various toxins didn't get elsewhere in the body, it would be kind of hard for them to cause pancreas, bladder, kidney, cervix, and stomach cancer, and acute myeloid leukemia (bone marrow cancer), or to show up in the urine.
I'd think they're the ones most likely to watch the whole thing. Nothing better to do ... :-)
Taking total seconds watched but excluding those that were not really watched, divided by the total that were not excluded, is accurate.
Reaching for the lawyer's number would appear, n this case, somewhat justified
Why? You say every single one is in stock, and that you checked it yourself, which is easily verifiable (and I did). Besides, they're more likely to need a lawyer to help sell the business or do a prepackaged bankruptcy.
Its also why, you should probably have capable editors
How about capable trolls? You certainly don't fil the bill.