It is cheaper, better and easier to dispose of the waste. I agree with you, but can we avoid using the word 'dispose'? Can we all agree that it's really just 'sweeping under the carpet'?
2. The receiving user must have downloaded the XNA Framework runtime environment for the Xbox 360 3. The receiving user must have XNA Game Studio Express installed on their own development PC
Ew. I remember people espousing Java as THE programming language of the future... but those runtime libraries, eh? Where is all the (consumer) Java software today? (Notwithstanding Azureus).
I'll give it a looksee but C++ is still way more attractive to me for GD. Web on the other hand...
(which must amount to literally millions of pages).
Actually the true number of pages on the subject has been grossly over-estimated, and most of the pages on the subject were written inadvertantly by people writing about other things. Strange but true.
The thing that causes me discomfort when using a computer for long periods is shoulder tension from suspending my arms and hands in place over my keyboard. This screen will free up your shoulders to move. Besides I think that if it takes a little more physical effort to use it's a good thing.
As long as you could freely adjust the angle and position of the screen I bet you wouldn't need as many micro-breaks.
I could be wrong, but I thought the concept of 'Irreducible Complexity' in the context of Intelligent Design came out of a thought experiment: Consider an organism with several parts that work in unison. If the organism requires all those parts in order to function, how could evolutional process gradually build the organism from molecules?
At the very least someone could establish communication with the patent office, pointing out that Slashdot vast living database of tech tidbits. If a patent office worker had a column on Slashdot asking for examples of prior art where he/she couldn't dig any up, there would be no problems..?
i think the article expained a slightly different method:
"Krister Wolff and Peter Nordin of Chalmers University of Technology built a robot with wings and then gave it random instructions through a computer at the rate of 20 per second. "
what i understood was that the technicians were feeding it instructions themselves, rather than the robot generating it's own possible instructions.
so it wasn't actually _working out_ how to solve the problem, it was essentially asked to try different things and decide whether they helped.
i'd like to see a robot generating new trials for _itself_ and _then_ eliminating the less helpful ones - this would then be a model of animal learning, which would get me really excited! with an exclamation mark! that's pretty excited.
but correct me if i'm wrong:)
Re:The only problem is this: Culture
on
A New Kind of War
·
· Score: 1
are you saying that the rest of the world is not a cesspit of drugs and violence?
if they write the show from the right perspective it could be really interesting. the writers would have full freedom to do whatever they like to the characters, just to see how they react...like the simpsons really.
a live action show where we follow all the regular sitcom shite (the characters interact by themselves in the game don't they?), but with a hand zooming around which can do fun things, like;
Click->Turn Off TV->Argument Ensues->Someone Gets Punched;
or perhaps Click->Remove Toilet->Soggy Carpet->People Get Evicted. stuff like that.
i think it could be fun to watch...that is, of course, assuming the TV executives are interested in making a really good show that doesn't piss all over the game.
Slashdot Mirror
No, please don't come here. It's fine the way it is. You're not missing anything anyway, honest.
2. The receiving user must have downloaded the XNA Framework runtime environment for the Xbox 360
3. The receiving user must have XNA Game Studio Express installed on their own development PC
Ew. I remember people espousing Java as THE programming language of the future... but those runtime libraries, eh? Where is all the (consumer) Java software today? (Notwithstanding Azureus).
I'll give it a looksee but C++ is still way more attractive to me for GD. Web on the other hand...
(which must amount to literally millions of pages).
Actually the true number of pages on the subject has been grossly over-estimated, and most of the pages on the subject were written inadvertantly by people writing about other things. Strange but true.
The thing that causes me discomfort when using a computer for long periods is shoulder tension from suspending my arms and hands in place over my keyboard. This screen will free up your shoulders to move. Besides I think that if it takes a little more physical effort to use it's a good thing.
As long as you could freely adjust the angle and position of the screen I bet you wouldn't need as many micro-breaks.
Mine has a kind of leprous growth.
I could be wrong, but I thought the concept of 'Irreducible Complexity' in the context of Intelligent Design came out of a thought experiment: Consider an organism with several parts that work in unison. If the organism requires all those parts in order to function, how could evolutional process gradually build the organism from molecules?
Is this the same as your definition?
> If He wants to violate non-contradiction He can.
No he can't. Yes he can. So can I.
'Specially given how much they cost.
good record with Sci-Fi? take E.T and Gremlins - two movies with cool ideas that could have been scary. and look what he came up with.
At the very least someone could establish communication with the patent office, pointing out that Slashdot vast living database of tech tidbits. If a patent office worker had a column on Slashdot asking for examples of prior art where he/she couldn't dig any up, there would be no problems..?
we've got 'em in new zealand. for about...15 years? at least?
Why did you make me think of this?
Yes, food *is* a bad example. It sells itself.
You just have to LOOK at a range of food and you know what you want.
"But the growth of broadband is lagging. " i wonder if John B. Judis even realised the pun here ;)
i think the article expained a slightly different method: "Krister Wolff and Peter Nordin of Chalmers University of Technology built a robot with wings and then gave it random instructions through a computer at the rate of 20 per second. " what i understood was that the technicians were feeding it instructions themselves, rather than the robot generating it's own possible instructions. so it wasn't actually _working out_ how to solve the problem, it was essentially asked to try different things and decide whether they helped. i'd like to see a robot generating new trials for _itself_ and _then_ eliminating the less helpful ones - this would then be a model of animal learning, which would get me really excited! with an exclamation mark! that's pretty excited. but correct me if i'm wrong :)
are you saying that the rest of the world is not a cesspit of drugs and violence?
a live action show where we follow all the regular sitcom shite (the characters interact by themselves in the game don't they?), but with a hand zooming around which can do fun things, like;
Click->Turn Off TV->Argument Ensues->Someone Gets Punched;
or perhaps Click->Remove Toilet->Soggy Carpet->People Get Evicted. stuff like that.
i think it could be fun to watch...that is, of course, assuming the TV executives are interested in making a really good show that doesn't piss all over the game.
hey, _I_ trust them. don't you?