Well, if every keystroke by every visitor in your "live search" box generates a server request.... You know, you asked for it!
Re:You don't have to burn wood -- people will do.
on
Archimedes Death Ray
·
· Score: 1
Yeah, Mythbusters should set up another experiment where they are placed _on_ the ship and try to look at the mirrors! They might get a good tan as well.
Actually, for 99%+ of people I guess the formula would be: "Want me to pay 10x more attention? Pay me _3x_ more." But then there's that new luxury car and a boat I need as a CEO... Hmm, tough call. NOT!
You can as well ban "software development" as a trade. After all - WTF? You get what you pay for. I say that your average "in-house" enterprise software system has complexity no less than Toyota Camry or something. The difference being that software would be developed by 1-10 men during a year or two whereas any other _industrial_ design costs (both in $$$ and "man/hours") much, much, much bigger. But who cares? Get back to coding, you idiots!
I may be stupid, but how does it "add a new layer"? If Apple is to buy a very substantial amount of Samsung flash chips (40%?) then what's in it for Samsung to sell it at "below-market prices"?
Also - WTF is "below-market prices"? I believe that does not mean that Samsung is gonna sell it at below the cost to produce, no?
But puhhhlease, don't put MySQL performance based on MyISAM and feature set based on InnoDB! Stick to either one. BTW - last I checked for myself, Firebird was beating _even_ MyISAM for raw speed on simple queries for local engine. Something I did not expect. Oh, yeah! When comparing performance please include results for local engine AND over-the-LAN performance. Different beasts have different protocol issues that show up when using "real" LAN and may be masked when using "local" engine mode. For example, MySQL has very simple and LAN-friendly protocol. Unlike Firebird, but it's still ok. And MSSQL, EG, has very, very serious issues when used for lots of "simple" queries.
This is not specific to animation. Applies to live action movies too. Believe me - you don't want to know how they "dub" US (for example) movies here. Actually - for anime this is much less of a problem because (unlike US animation) they aren't anal about lip-sync'ing at all. Which is a good thing IMO - I'd rather have them working on a story, character design etc.
Sure! But the interesting question, IMHO, is _how_much_ more difficult it would be? If both hashes are "patchable" then what would be the difficulty to find a method to make _both_ hashes match simultaneously? (I'm not a cypherpunk, anyone?)
(sigh) Insightful, my ass... Checksums are NOT reversible. The main trick here is to replace one file with another and leave the hash/checksum the same by patching the fake file. (For practically every file format there exists a spare space where this patching could be done.)
Slashdot Mirror
Uncyclopedia?
http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Slashdot
Well, if every keystroke by every visitor in your "live search" box generates a server request.... You know, you asked for it!
Yeah, Mythbusters should set up another experiment where they are placed _on_ the ship and try to look at the mirrors! They might get a good tan as well.
Actually, for 99%+ of people I guess the formula would be: "Want me to pay 10x more attention? Pay me _3x_ more." But then there's that new luxury car and a boat I need as a CEO... Hmm, tough call. NOT!
You can as well ban "software development" as a trade. After all - WTF? You get what you pay for. I say that your average "in-house" enterprise software system has complexity no less than Toyota Camry or something. The difference being that software would be developed by 1-10 men during a year or two whereas any other _industrial_ design costs (both in $$$ and "man/hours") much, much, much bigger. But who cares? Get back to coding, you idiots!
And _when_ they come out with that, what "excuse" will you have next? (Just curious)
I guess when RIM counter-sues NTP (and wins of course) the NTP's CEO should be made selling his organs to pay for damages. That would only be fair.
As opposed to...?
I may be stupid, but how does it "add a new layer"? If Apple is to buy a very substantial amount of Samsung flash chips (40%?) then what's in it for Samsung to sell it at "below-market prices"?
Also - WTF is "below-market prices"? I believe that does not mean that Samsung is gonna sell it at below the cost to produce, no?
At those prices, why bother printing at home?
Mainly because it's fun. Some people like to tinker with their cars. Some like to print their photos at home.
Hey - they can do a lens head with lenses on both sides and make the head "rotatable". Should I patent that?
Steve Ballmer killed the psychologist! He killed the fucking guy! He did it before and he will do it again!
/me ducks
I guess it's a result of excessive "kancho". (You can read about it here: http://www.outpostnine.com/editorials/teacher.html )
Wow!.. Can anyone say RTFA?! Gives a whole new meaning to "FA" part (and "A" does not stand for "article" here, I tell you). [shocked]
1. Resolution
2. No need for backlight
3. Needs power only to _change_ image, not to hold it
Anyone care to explain how this is any different to "protection" scheme used (or rather, un-used) in SD/Secure_Digital cards?
Is that you?
http://www.japundit.com/images/GirlyMan.jpg
But puhhhlease, don't put MySQL performance based on MyISAM and feature set based on InnoDB! Stick to either one. BTW - last I checked for myself, Firebird was beating _even_ MyISAM for raw speed on simple queries for local engine. Something I did not expect. Oh, yeah! When comparing performance please include results for local engine AND over-the-LAN performance. Different beasts have different protocol issues that show up when using "real" LAN and may be masked when using "local" engine mode. For example, MySQL has very simple and LAN-friendly protocol. Unlike Firebird, but it's still ok. And MSSQL, EG, has very, very serious issues when used for lots of "simple" queries.
This is not specific to animation. Applies to live action movies too. Believe me - you don't want to know how they "dub" US (for example) movies here. Actually - for anime this is much less of a problem because (unlike US animation) they aren't anal about lip-sync'ing at all. Which is a good thing IMO - I'd rather have them working on a story, character design etc.
We are talking anime here. It would've been "perversion" if "sexy friend" had no neko-no-mimi ;)
Hmmm... So many opportunities I see now!
:)
Sure! But the interesting question, IMHO, is _how_much_ more difficult it would be? If both hashes are "patchable" then what would be the difficulty to find a method to make _both_ hashes match simultaneously? (I'm not a cypherpunk, anyone?)
Oh, here's their CRC function:
BYTE CRC(BYTE *p, size_t sz)
{
BYTE res = 0;
while (sz--) {
res ^= *p++;
}
return res;
}
// I wish I were kidding.. Not in MS's code though, but I've seen exactly this.
(sigh) Insightful, my ass... Checksums are NOT reversible. The main trick here is to replace one file with another and leave the hash/checksum the same by patching the fake file. (For practically every file format there exists a spare space where this patching could be done.)