Write an email. Put it someplace where it can be found, but won't be unless directed to (on a web server, in your desk, on your hard drive, etc.) Don't let anyone see it, but put it in your will. Assuming you have family members who love and care about you, there should be no problem.
The point is that one 300GB drive is pretty pointless, unless it's in your 1U rackmount. Maybe if you need terabyte, it makes sense, but the average buyer probably doesn't need more than 300GB.
Wireless networking is fairly low power. It's not going to create near the amount of energy of a microwave, which operates just slightly higher on the spectrum. Should we illegalize microwaves in schools too?
Saying "NAT as a security tool is the network equivalent of Security through Obscurity, and is just as flawed" is like saying that a key is not a security tool in a house with windows, since I can break the windows to get in.
NAT makes an attack on the inside of the network substantial more difficult. It doesn't prevent an attack through email, but it's only one part of a proper consumer security toolkit, which should include some form of antivirus software as well. It does prevent MSBlaster, and not just through obscurity, but because it's physically impossible to attack the vulnerability.
In addition, a system on a network with NAT can indeed act as a server. It just requires the user to be aware that he/she is setting one up.
If you use SSL-encrypted SMTP on the server and client, and the recipient uses SSL-encrypted POP3/IMAP, you're secure anyway. This method requires just as much, if not more, setup than that method.
The first thing I thought of when I saw this is that it might be useful for profiling complex algorithms. You might be able to get a general idea of how many times you were missing the cache, etc.
Of course, a cache miss indicator would be a lot more useful, but this might do something.
That SCO will have to remove any BSD-licensed code from their Unices? (And I'm sure there is some.)
Just get a subscription to Wired
on
The Diamond Age
·
· Score: 1
Every single month, I look forward to getting my copy of Wired. I don't look forward to seeing the same stories posted on Slashdot one or two days afterward. It doesn't really excite me.
I agree; we need something that's designed from scratch to compile. However, we do have a few options already. Most notably, there's perlcc, which compiles Perl into C code and then compiles that into machine code.
From what I've read, the only evolutionary reason to have sex is protection against other organisms. Here, we don't need to do that. Of course, I could be wrong, but that's what I've read. If anyone has a better explanation for sex, please let me know.
Either way, in this circumstance, it completely fucks up the poem, so we might want to do without it.
Slashdot Mirror
Write an email. Put it someplace where it can be found, but won't be unless directed to (on a web server, in your desk, on your hard drive, etc.) Don't let anyone see it, but put it in your will. Assuming you have family members who love and care about you, there should be no problem.
It's off by default. Turn it off and pay the consequences.
The point is that one 300GB drive is pretty pointless, unless it's in your 1U rackmount. Maybe if you need terabyte, it makes sense, but the average buyer probably doesn't need more than 300GB.
120GB 5400RPM drives at $80 a piece x 4 = $320
+ $100 for a RAID 5 controller
You get 360GB of space, it's faster, it's more reliable, and it costs the same price.
Can you do me a favor?
Just by accident one time:
DELETE FROM call_list
Thank you.
Wireless networking is fairly low power. It's not going to create near the amount of energy of a microwave, which operates just slightly higher on the spectrum. Should we illegalize microwaves in schools too?
Look at the list of previous winners. It's usually a long time before a Nobel prize is awarded.
Definitely wouldn't surprise me.
But I've always been a fan of the CharisMac Firewire Dino.
It's called yum.
I use it on all of my machines. It works very nicely.
Saying "NAT as a security tool is the network equivalent of Security through Obscurity, and is just as flawed" is like saying that a key is not a security tool in a house with windows, since I can break the windows to get in.
NAT makes an attack on the inside of the network substantial more difficult. It doesn't prevent an attack through email, but it's only one part of a proper consumer security toolkit, which should include some form of antivirus software as well. It does prevent MSBlaster, and not just through obscurity, but because it's physically impossible to attack the vulnerability.
In addition, a system on a network with NAT can indeed act as a server. It just requires the user to be aware that he/she is setting one up.
From the PGPi website, including the source.
Might not work on newer hardware, but it's still available.
If you use SSL-encrypted SMTP on the server and client, and the recipient uses SSL-encrypted POP3/IMAP, you're secure anyway. This method requires just as much, if not more, setup than that method.
The first thing I thought of when I saw this is that it might be useful for profiling complex algorithms. You might be able to get a general idea of how many times you were missing the cache, etc.
Of course, a cache miss indicator would be a lot more useful, but this might do something.
North Korea is in the Middle East?
I always knew the facts they were feeding us in school were bullshit!
That SCO will have to remove any BSD-licensed code from their Unices? (And I'm sure there is some.)
Every single month, I look forward to getting my copy of Wired. I don't look forward to seeing the same stories posted on Slashdot one or two days afterward. It doesn't really excite me.
Does it take that much longer to do php.net/function_name ? It's only a few extra characters, and it'll work in any browser.
And has the same speed, so the MHz rating is irrelevant...
Even with the compiling, it takes less time to install some stuff (eg nmap) than it would take to locate the relevant .rpm.
Not with something like Debian's apt-get (fine, it's not RPM), yum, or Red Hat's up2date.
Not everyone is the same person. Perhaps he should realize this.
I agree; we need something that's designed from scratch to compile. However, we do have a few options already. Most notably, there's perlcc, which compiles Perl into C code and then compiles that into machine code.
From what I've read, the only evolutionary reason to have sex is protection against other organisms. Here, we don't need to do that. Of course, I could be wrong, but that's what I've read. If anyone has a better explanation for sex, please let me know.
Either way, in this circumstance, it completely fucks up the poem, so we might want to do without it.
Well, you know, there's a picture of a device (albeit a crude one) using the chip there, so I'd say the chip is a reality.
It's just that the mod_perl code must run on 1.3, since mod_perl on 2.0 isn't there yet.
images.slashdot.org has run 2.0 since before the original 2.0 release announcement was posted. See the Netcraft page.