Slashdot Mirror


AMD Buys Pre-VIA Cyrix Media-GX Division

An anonymous reader writes "A long time ago, in what feels like a different universe, Cyrix created the first sub-$1000 PC based on a 2 chip solution called the Media-GX. Soon after National Semiconductor bought Cyrix, keeping the Media-GX team and selling the 686MX team to VIA. In the meantime, the Media-GX team have created the a series of single chip PCs, and a totally new CPU, the GX2. Now National Semiconductor is selling the division to AMD, which should give it a higher profile and better fab technology again." Reader jlouderb reminds us of National Semiconductor's Device Girls promotion, "a lame take-off on the Spice Girls," and points to coverage at eWeek of the purchase.

157 comments

  1. Old school by mao+che+minh · · Score: 5, Informative
    Speaking of old CPUs: Memory lane of old CPUs

    It even has a picture of the Media-GX in there.

  2. Device Girls by saskwach · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ugh, can't anyone appeal to common sense instead of sex drive? Make way for bad hardware related puns.

    1. Re:Device Girls by Tumbleweed · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hey, I wanna know where they are now. Where's the E! True Hollywood Story on the Device Girls? Are they in pr0n, yet? :)

      USB Spice
      FireWire Spice
      Gigabit Spice
      mini-ITX Spice

      Mmmmm.

    2. Re:Device Girls by lewiz · · Score: 1

      No, no!

      It's obviously ``Hard drive Spice'' ;)

    3. Re:Device Girls by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      BabyAT Spice!

    4. Re:Device Girls by Trigun · · Score: 1

      What about SCSI spice?

      If you ask me, they're all kind of scuzzy.

    5. Re:Device Girls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "What about SCSI spice?"

      Yeah, she was racked......

    6. Re:Device Girls by scotch · · Score: 1
      Ugh, can't anyone appeal to common sense instead of sex drive?

      What, are you new to the natural world? Your puritanical disapproval of sex is both unnatural and self-destructive. All things relate to sex. I for one appreciate the advertisers constant reminder that, yes, virginia, there is only one biological imperitive: to sire as many bastards as possible. Sex in advertising makes us aware of a products connection with sex, gives meaning to our consumerism impulses, and gives us hope in an increasingly assexual, nihilistic world.

      I say more sex in advertising! Especially hot girl-on-girl action.

      --
      XML causes global warming.
    7. Re:Device Girls by tuffy · · Score: 3, Funny
      USB Spice FireWire Spice Gigabit Spice mini-ITX Spice

      Don't forget PSpice.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    8. Re:Device Girls by saskwach · · Score: 1
      So...You don't mind being told that if you buy something from National Semiconductor you'll get laid? I would rather have a product be sold to me on its merits than on the merits of some models who get paid to pretend to want to have sex with me. It's just kind of insulting.

      This is not a puritanical disapproval of sex. I'm perfectly fine with sex, just not in advertising where the product is not sex related. Try to sell me a box of condoms with promises of a better sex life? Sure, go for it. Try to sell me a car, telling me it's likely to get me laid? Well, maybe...But electronics? Come on. Appeal to higher brain functions, please.

    9. Re:Device Girls by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      > Don't forget PSpice.

      Now _that's_ just gross.

    10. Re:Device Girls by scotch · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Appeal to higher brain functions, please

      The purpose of the higher brain functions is getting laid more often. Grandparent post was written tongue in cheek. Is your tampon interfering with your sense of humor?

      --
      XML causes global warming.
    11. Re:Device Girls by Zugok · · Score: 1

      why why why can't people see that SCSI is pronounced sexy and not scuzzy.

      --
      "I just can't sit while people are saying nonsense in a meeting without saying it's nonsense" J Watson, Sci Am 288:(4)51
    12. Re:Device Girls by WeblionX · · Score: 0

      'Cause it's not?

      --
      (\(\
      (=_=) Bani!
      (")")
  3. Yes but... by Sir+Haxalot · · Score: 0

    Typically Cyrix have made very poor CPUs, I doubt there top of the range chips would be able to beat a top of the range celeron, why would anyone want to buy them?

    --
    I have over 70 freaks, do you?
    1. Re:Yes but... by computechnica · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They were the first true 2-chip(CPU+Northbridge and a Southbridge) Computers for failed Information Appliance market (IE Audrey,Virgin Webplayer, ETc). Very small, cheap, and power effecient. I have a Webplayer that I modded to run RH as a Mp3 player and Digital picture frame with WiFi and it only uses 25 watts including monitor!!

    2. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      very true only a dipshit would want anything less than a P-4 3.9 Ghz processor and 4 gigs of ram...

      I can safely say that they dont WANT your kind of business.

    3. Re:Yes but... by computechnica · · Score: 1

      I just remembered I still have some crappy webplayer pics on my site. Enjoy

      Motherboard
      Slashdot on Virgin
      48meg Disk on Chip
      Overclockable

  4. lame? hardly... by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They certainly looked better than the Spice Girls. I bet they sounded better, too, though who cares about that. :)

    1. Re:lame? hardly... by KillerHamster · · Score: 1

      Just so they don't sound worse. THAT I care about.

    2. Re:lame? hardly... by evil-osm · · Score: 1

      They likly sounded like the Spice Girls being played on a Media-GX audio system :)

      (ugh!)

      --


      E.

      Never rub another man's rhubarb - The Joker
  5. Reminds me of something else... by goldspider · · Score: 4, Funny
    "Reader jlouderb reminds us of National Semiconductor's Device Girls promotion, 'a lame take-off on the Spice Girls,'"

    Am I the only one who thought of "Device Girls" as those unenlightened females who prefer various mechanical devices over us virile geeks?

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    1. Re:Reminds me of something else... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Am I the only one who thought of "Device Girls" as those unenlightened females who prefer various mechanical devices over us virile geeks?

      yes

    2. Re:Reminds me of something else... by leviramsey · · Score: 0, Troll

      Is it just me, or is your .sig a tribute to goatse?

    3. Re:Reminds me of something else... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Astute you are, friend!

    4. Re:Reminds me of something else... by Khakionion · · Score: 1

      As unenlightened as they are, apparently there's enough of them to create special editions of products just for them.

      --
      OMG! Wau!
    5. Re:Reminds me of something else... by Xerithane · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Am I the only one who thought of "Device Girls" as those unenlightened females who prefer various mechanical devices over us virile geeks?

      Nope.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    6. Re:Reminds me of something else... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you're not the only one - Slashdot is awash in fucktards

  6. The /. Troll Howto 0.6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    This is version 0.6 of a troll HOWTO, sort of a companion piece to jsm's excellent troll FAQ. As a draft, comments and criticism are always welcome, if not appreciated :)
    Section 1 - Trolling techniques

    There are techniques used by successful trolls to elicit the maximum amount of responses from unthinking /.ers. This section is dedicated to explaining how to use these in the course of your trolls. Remember though, a great troll can break any or all of these and still be successful...

    * Timing

    Because you're posting as an AC, your troll will generally be ignored in favour of posters using their accounts, and so getting in early is essential. A good guideline is to get into the first 20 posts, so that people reading the article will see the troll before it is swamped out. One way of increasing the speed with which you get your troll into play is to prepare them beforehand, and then quickly customise them for the current article. This is easier than it sounds since /. typically repeats stories with small variations and runs lots of similar stories.

    Note that this is why Jon Katz stories are pretty worthless as trolling material - by the time you've found the article and prepared a troll there's already 50+ posts on it, most of them flaming Jon Katz anyway :)
    * Exposure

    Once you've got your troll in, you need people to actually read it. You also want replies - /.ers are more likely to read your troll if it starts a large thread. You also want to remember that some people have set their comment thresholds to values higher than 0 - to get the attention of these you either want to get your post moderated up (see Style, below) or get a reply which gets moderated up to 4 or 5, in which case your troll becomes visible to all.
    * Accounts

    An alternative to the time-honoured tradition of AC trolling is that of creating a troll account. This gives you the advantage of posting at 1 rather than 0, and slashbots are more likely to take you seriously, especially if you at least sound reasonable. If you do this, try to avoid posting stuff where it is obvious you're a troll under the account - post it anoymously instead - some slightly more canny readers actually check your user info before they reply. Not many though :)

    The ultimate goal of the troll account is to secure the +1 bonus, which is currently received once you hit 26 points of Karma. To get there, employ the techniques of karma whoring that we see every day on /. and watch the karma roll in. And of course once you get the +1 bonus, the world is your oyster in terms of /. Posts made at a default of 2 hit even those people with the threshold of 2, are more likely to get moderated up even further if they are at all coherent, and people tend to lose their critical thinking abilities in the face of the +1 bonus. Milk it for all it's worth.
    * Layout

    To get people reading it a troll needs to be easily readable. Make sure you break it down into easily digestible paragraphs, use HTML tags where appropriate (but always make sure you close them properly) and use whitespace appropriately.
    * Size

    Generally a troll shouldn't be too short, otherwise it'll get lost in the crowd. A workable minimum is a couple of medium paragraphs. Conversely, it shouldn't be too long, or no-one will bother to read it. Keep it to a happy medium.
    * Spelling

    Whilst spelling is important if you want the troll to be taken seriously, key spelling mistakes can draw out the spelling zealots, especially if you mis-spell the name of a venerated /. hero, like Linus Torveldes or Richard Strawlman (thanks dmg). Related to this is the use of the wrong word, explaining an acronym as being something it isn't or making a word into an acronym even when it isn't.
    * Subject

  7. Possible purpose by crow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Perhaps what AMD wants is not their CPU, but the stuff that they've integrated in with it to create a single-chip PC. In a year or so, we might see a single-chip system based on one of the AMD processors.

    1. Re:Possible purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      "single-chip PC".

      No.

      If you would RTFA, you would see that they are getting into the set-top box market. But why RTFA when you have to post early to get karma right!

    2. Re:Possible purpose by niko9 · · Score: 1

      A bit offtopic, but what I wanna know is, whatever happened to those 2 cpu's on one chip people were talking about a while back?

    3. Re:Possible purpose by RevRigel · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You can already get single chip systems based on their IA chips if you're doing embedded development: Kontron's X-Board, which just came out. We're using a Kontron PC/104 board with a standalone Geode on it right now and it's the most rock solid board I've ever used. The X-board is going to make our next revision incredibly small, low power, and inexpensive.

      Although, I have to wonder what this will do the ZFMicrosystems lawsuit against National. Basically, ZFMicro was started by the original founder of Ampro, which originated the popular PC/104 standard, and integrated a 586 processor core with a bunch of peripherals into the ZFx86, a neat little cheap (I have an MZ104 from Tri-m Systems that uses it. Squeezes a slackware distro into a 6.8MB file on a flash chip). Unfortunately, ZFMicro used National as their foundry and for some of their last-line development. So National got access to schematics and layout info for the chip, instead of just masks. National then proceeded to steal it and integrate the Geode proc they bought from Cyrix with some on-chip peripherals in the same way, and then put ZFMicro out of business by refusing to ship any more ZFx86s.

    4. Re:Possible purpose by swordboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Perhaps what AMD wants is not their CPU, but the stuff that they've integrated in with it to create a single-chip PC.

      Well... that is the only logical conclusion. ARM has taken the portable world because X86 compatibility isn't important there. It will be some time before AMD can afford to put an entire Athlon system on a chip but it will eventually happen. Now they just need to buy a graphics chip designer like AMD or nVidia.

      Can you imagine the bandwidth between CPU and video? A 2048-bit bus between video and CPU wouldn't be a problem if you put it all on the same chip, not to mention the reduction in latentcy with the memory interface.

      Maybe the nVidia/AMD relationship ala NForce is a sign of what is to come?

      --

      Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    5. Re:Possible purpose by Christopher+Bibbs · · Score: 1

      Actually, I don't think the "PC on a chip" idea conflicts with the making of thin clients and set-top boxes. It would lower assembly costs and allow them to get acceptable performance in a very small package.

    6. Re:Possible purpose by Cyno · · Score: 1

      Huh. I wonder how close this is to that AMD alchemy au1100 chip.

    7. Re:Possible purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      the die size would be huge and the yield would be almost 0. the technology to fab that just doesn't exist yet

    8. Re:Possible purpose by Dielectric · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not close at all, but interestingly they go after the same applications. The Au1x00 chips are MIPS cored, so they're not even close architecturally.

      I really have no good idea why AMD bought these jokers. Maybe AMD was infringing on NS's IP, and the results was that AMD just buys that part of NS?

      Damn, it's hot under this tinfoil hat.

    9. Re:Possible purpose by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Now they just need to buy a graphics chip designer like AMD or nVidia.

      AMD just needs to buy AMD, eh? I'll assume you mean ATI.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    10. Re:Possible purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey moron, try to pay more attention. And quit being such a butt licker while you are at it.

    11. Re:Possible purpose by William+Tanksley · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If you remember the interview with Chuck Moore (of Forth fame) a while back, he was promoting a chip kinda like this. 25 CPUs all on one chip (5x5), with a grid of 18-bit busses, 5 each way, connecting them all to each other horizontally and vertically. He hadn't built any, but based on his previous chips at much larger scales, he was estimating about 2400MHz maximum bus input latency; with 10 independant busses, that means an upper bound of 10*2400M*18=432,000Mbps internal.

      Of course, that's all noise -- none of the chips would have time to do real work :-), nor to listen for any of that "information". But the sheer magnitude of the number is a bit staggering. But anyhow, yes, on-chip busses are pretty fun.

      Oh, latest rumor: he took the 25x page down because he'd found a buyer. Very little other info available.

      -Billy

    12. Re:Possible purpose by pantherace · · Score: 1
      Go ask IBM (Power4) or HP (PARISC) and be prepared to pay for it.

      Theoretically IA-64 will be getting this (and I will believe it when I see one. (and given how Intel keeps it's IA-64 related schedules I'll say 2032 perhaps)

      Damn Compaq for not letting us have alphas that way (The first mention of it being serious was alphas-just before compaq bought them and decided to milk the alpha users)

    13. Re:Possible purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Unfortunately, ZFMicro used National as their foundry and for some of their last-line development. So National got access to schematics and layout info for the chip, instead of just masks. National then proceeded to steal it and integrate the Geode proc they bought from Cyrix with some on-chip peripherals in the same way, and then put ZFMicro out of business by refusing to ship any more ZFx86s.

      Remember this next time somebody wants to outsource stuff to India/Phillipeans/etc.

    14. Re:Possible purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      estimating about 2400MHz maximum bus input latency

      What the heck does that mean? Latency isn't cyclic, and you don't have back-to-back latency either.

      with 10 independant busses, that means an upper bound of 10*2400M*18=432,000Mbps internal.

      So... is that supposed to be maximum throughput?

      This would all make sense if you meant "bus speed" instead of latency, but that doesn't make me want to trust your numbers, especially since the processor-to-processor maximum throughput sounds like a useless variable.

    15. Re:Possible purpose by finallyHasANickname · · Score: 1
      Damn Compaq for not letting us have alphas that way (The first mention of it being serious was alphas-just before compaq bought them and decided to milk the alpha users)

      "Milk"? Is that what you kids are calling it these days? Is "Milk" when you drop trou and make some grunting noises and exudate malodorous brown substance upon the object of that transitive verb? Don't get me wrong. I don't completely hate Compaq. It's just that I like everything Canadian (including their ever-threatened sense of independence up there, eh), and I think Compaq squandered the capabilities of what it drank up there (i.e., the great company, Digital Equipment Corp).

      Look. A close relative of mine works intimately with telecom hardware. Let's put it this way: He keeps a screwdriver and a VT100 emulator handy everywhere he goes. VT100. Ah. That was an invention from whom? From Digital Equipment Corp. Back in the day... (Now you are waking up again.) ...and the second fastest number cruncher on earth was the VAX, which was the open system platform while I was in college, challenging Unix for the ultimate in pissing contests.

      Now that I've completely alienated everyone...

      ...I had always drooled over the DEC Alphas. There seemed something magical when the clock rate was 200ish MHz, but they could demonstrably perform--what was it?--230ish million floating point operations per second. The thing was that I could never quite justify the price, yanno? :-/ Anyone else wanna contribute to this orgy of vague self pity and eulogy for the de facto dead company, DEC?

    16. Re:Possible purpose by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      "Can you imagine the bandwidth between CPU and video?"

      It actually doesn't matter much. The bandwidth of the AGP bus is used mostly for loading textures into the GPU; it's the memory bandwidth on the card that makes it fast. Now, a GPU/Memory integrated combo would be very interesting. Unfortunately, it would also be far more expensive than discrete memory.

    17. Re:Possible purpose by William+Tanksley · · Score: 1

      What the heck does that mean? Latency isn't cyclic, and you don't have back-to-back latency either.

      Sorry, I used the wrong word. I don't design chips (well, not since that one class in college) and don't know the terminology. I meant that each bus can accept new data 2,400,000,000 times every second.

      with 10 independant busses, that means an upper bound of 10*2400M*18=432,000Mbps internal.

      So... is that supposed to be maximum throughput


      Not in the sense I understand it; perhaps you might call it "maximum combined internal throughput", though.

      especially since the processor-to-processor maximum throughput sounds like a useless variable.

      The processor-to-processor maximum throughput is, of course, a constant, not a variable -- 2400MHz*18 bits = 43200Mbps. That's not a useless number; it's the actual speed that two adjacent processors within this chip can burst data to each other. This can become very useful when one of the processors is controlling a high-speed external device, such as an optical receiver at the end of an OC48 fiber. Maximum chip throughput would probably be half the chip-to-chip burst, since each processor would take one cycle to send the data and one to receive it (but that could be sustained indefinitely, so long as the bus being used for the two to communicate isn't being used by any other chips).

      By the way: The outer processors in the grid are connected directly to the pins, giving the 25x a programmable pinout. The originally designed configuration had a pinout that exactly matched a 4ns SRAM (and the software driver for talking to the SRAM in on-chip ROM), thus allowing the chip to hook up to the SRAM and use it with the addition of a bit of solder and a power hookup -- a nice trick.

      -Billy

  8. Arrgh by 4of12 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Please, do not revive the old jokes about mount and devices.

    We've all read the sigs about the subject.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
    1. Re:Arrgh by Shriek · · Score: 0

      Would jokes about umount and devices be ok?

    2. Re:Arrgh by finallyHasANickname · · Score: 1
      Please, do not revive the old jokes about mount and devices.

      But that parrot hurts so bad, and Natalie Portman's fresh grits were ready to eat by breakfast time, and a Beowolf cluster really really would be a fscking economical way to get the most out of whatever device she wants to mount... and, and, and

  9. National Semiconductor analog procs? by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

    What does this mean for National Semiconductor's analog processing business?

    --
    Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    1. Re:National Semiconductor analog procs? by stratjakt · · Score: 2

      "This deal makes sense for both companies," Halla said in a prepared statement. I"This allows National Semiconductor to focus on growing our core analog business and improving our returns. At the same time, AMD will be able to leverage the Geode technology through their existing manufacturing and marketing infrastructure."

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:National Semiconductor analog procs? by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

      Oops.. I RPOTFA, but guess I didn't get down that far. Thanks!

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
  10. IBM going to buy AMD? by useosx · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This story reminded me of an article from the Register about how some analysts think IBM will eventually buy AMD. Didn't IBM used to sell Cyrix chips or something?

    1. Re:IBM going to buy AMD? by computechnica · · Score: 1

      IBM owned the FAB that produced Cyrix chips, the same way they own the FABs that make PowerPC CPUs. AMD has two of best FABs in the world at Dresden and Houston. It would give as much capacity as Intel who owns FABs in third world countries.

    2. Re:IBM going to buy AMD? by gatkinso · · Score: 1

      Intel FAB's

      Chandler, Arizona
      Santa Clara, CA
      Colorado Springs, CO
      Leixlip, Ireland
      Jersusalem, Israel
      Qiryat Gat, Israel
      Houston, Mass
      Hillsboro, Oregon

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    3. Re:IBM going to buy AMD? by computechnica · · Score: 1

      So why do most Celerons and Pentium 4s say MALAYSIA,Costa Rica, Phillipines on them? Maybe thats just where they are packaged?

      I wonder if the next version of Winblows will say MADE IN INDIA on a little oval sticker on the bottom? :^)

    4. Re:IBM going to buy AMD? by bikegeek · · Score: 1

      Actually, the fabs are in Dresden and Austin; there is no Houston fab. The AMD CPUs are all manufactured in Dresden these days as the Austin fab has switched over to doing memory (flash). Packaging is over in Asia (Singapore and Malaysia mainly).

      --
      "Make it idiot-proof and someone will make a better idiot." - Unknown Author
    5. Re:IBM going to buy AMD? by gatkinso · · Score: 1

      Assmebly and test sites:

      San Jose, Costa Rica
      Shanghai, China
      Kulim, Malaysia
      Penang, Malaysia

      http://www.intel.com/pressroom/kits/manufacturin g/ manufacturing_at_a_glance.pdf

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  11. Lemme guess.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are either, gay or one of the uglier than hell femenists that can't get laid and decides to whine constantly about "femenist issues"..

    Am I right? Which one?

    1. Re:Lemme guess.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry to disappoint, but I'm actually a male geek in a good relationship with (gasp) a girl. I happen to think that marketing is better when it targets the head on top of the consumer's shoulders...And yes, I disapprove of the objectification of women in modern society, but that's a pretty big cliche. Anyhow, are you an overweight greasy code monkey who has to look at computer ads to get off?

    2. Re:Lemme guess.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Translated:

      My girl is a frigid porker and sexuality makes me nervous and frustrated.

  12. What AMD needs to buy is... by notetoi · · Score: 2

    a chipset company, and/or a motherboard company, and someone to clarify the cpu naming mombo-jumbo! Confusion is not the way to compete!

    (offtopic, I know, just venting)

    1. Re:What AMD needs to buy is... by theendlessnow · · Score: 2, Funny

      ... Intel. That would certainly solve many of their problems.

    2. Re:What AMD needs to buy is... by Hoser+McMoose · · Score: 2, Insightful

      AMD seems to be finally starting to take chipset design somewhat seriously, plus they finally got a decent third party chipset manufacturer a couple years ago when nVidia signed on. I don't think that they need to make motherboards themselves, but I do believe that they should contract one of the Taiwanese companies to make AMD-branded motherboards.

      As for AMD's naming scheme though, I rather like how they are doing things with the Opteron. It's VERY simple but also much more descriptive than using MHz/GHz to describe a chip. You have three numbers, first represents how many of these chips you can pack into a single system (1, 2 or 8), the second represents the core revision (currently only version '4', which I guess is a rather random number to start with), and the last represents relative performance within that core version (0, 2, 4 and now 6).

      Personally I find that much easier and less confusing than just MHz. Take Intel's Pentium 4 for example. There were 3 different versions of the 2.0GHz P4 and now 3 different versions of the 2.4GHz chip. The 3.06GHz P4 is faster than one version of the 3.0GHz P4, but slower than the other version of the 3.0GHz P4. To differentiate all these different versions Intel just sticks letters like 'A', 'B' etc. at the end of the clock speed in a fairly random manner. For the 2.0GHz vs. 2.0A chip, the 'A' referred to having more cache and lower power consumption. For the 2.4GHz vs. 2.4B vs. 2.4C chips it's all bus speed (400MHz vs. 533MHz vs. 800MHz). Of course, Intel REALLY out did themselves back with the old 600MHz PIII, where they had no less than 6 different versions of the chip! What's worse, a socket PIII 600MHz chip was NOT the same chip as a Slot 1 PIII 600MHz, but rather the same as a PIII 600E.

      Long story short, using MHz/GHz to name chips is VERY confusing in this day and age. Things like cache size, I/O bandwidth and memory bandwidth are of major importance, while clock speed plays only a limited role in many situations.

  13. Device Girls! by Sean80 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'd go online with them any day! Reeeeoow!

    1. Re:Device Girls! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is the lame parent post interesting? Seriously. The laziness of the moderators knows no bounds: just imagine, for some moderator, that was the best use of one his precious mod points.

  14. In a galexy far, far away by 7x7 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I bought a montherboard with a 166+ 686 CPU from Cyrix. It worked better and lasted longer than the Gateway pentium 166 boxes we had at work. Alas, my rommate spilled a pot of coffee on the bugger and it died with a POP, a SNAP and a SIZZLE. From what I learned, there were two versions of that chip. Version 1 overheated a lot, but if you kept it cool it was fine. Verion 2 didn't overheat, but flaked and flaked and flaked until you wanted to beat it with a bat. My sis wanted a box and I got her a $199 PC with a Cyrix MII 333 chip a few years later. Mistake. 'nuf said. End of my Cyrix experience.

    1. Re:In a galexy far, far away by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Thats funny, we still have gateway 166 boxes here, and they're all still working just fine.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:In a galexy far, far away by Mr.+Frilly · · Score: 1

      I had one of those Cyrix 166 CPU's. They actually ran at 133 MHz....

      It was a very inexpensive chip, which was great as I was an undergrad, and it gave reasonably good performance for the time.

      It was also the first CPU I'd ever owned that needed a cooling fan. Not believing a CPU really needed its own fan, I opened up the case, booted the system, and tried stalling the CPU fan with my thumb while the OS was running. At least in my case, the computer could run for only a matter of seconds before hard stalling..... That processor was very sensitive to heat.

      Anyway, I bought a better fan for the thing, and ran the computer for 5 years without any crashes. Just had to keep the thing cool and it was fine.

    3. Re:In a galexy far, far away by gangibson · · Score: 2

      If by "version 2," you mean the 6x86L/PR166, that was my first Pentium-oid (i.e., not 486) CPU! Initially, I was quite pleased by it. Of course, as I started dabbling with 3d graphics (ok, ok, Quake), I quickly found the CPU's major shortcoming: really poor FPU performance. Anyway, I wanted to say that I had no trouble with its stability. No "flaking," no urges to beat it with a bat. Well, no stability-related urges to beat it with a bat... Good times, good times.

    4. Re:In a galexy far, far away by 7x7 · · Score: 1

      I just went through that site and looked up the two chips I had and they verified it all.

      The first Cyrix 166+ worked fine if you kept it cool.

      The first MII 333 was a flake.

      Those Pentium 166 boxes ran fine and solid, no argument there, but the Cyrix was a bit snappier. At least until the coffee...

    5. Re:In a galexy far, far away by 7x7 · · Score: 1

      I never actually owned the 2nd gen 166 (6x86L), but had a few friends who didn't like it. I remember something about a recall on the first one, and they got the L in return. Yeah, they weren't much good for 3d stuff, but they were great for most other stuff.

    6. Re:In a galexy far, far away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had one as well for 4+ years, and the only problem I had was it wouldn't run "KidPix" paint program for my daughter.

      I still have a Cyrix 6x86 PR200 machine that I bought for $20. It's running Mitel's E-Smith SME server to run my home LAN. Rock solid so far.

    7. Re:In a galexy far, far away by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Version 2 you must mean the 6x86L? The 6x86L was a dual voltage chip like the Pentium MMX, and finding motherboards was a bit tough. They were solid, though I did see some OEMs put the thing on 3.5V that the 6x86 was rated for, that probably caused some problems.

      I had a PR200+ version of it. It ran nice and cool. It wouldn't overclock (I think it was more the motherboard's fault, because the only way to overclock the sucker would be to run the bus speed at 75Mhz instead of 66Mhz, and I had cheap ram). However for a while I ran the core at 2.5V instead of 2.8V and ditched the fan. Nice and quiet.

      I do agree the FPU unit sucked hard. Playing a mp3 file would take 50-65% CPU utilization and made the computer pretty much useless for doing anything else while it played.

    8. Re:In a galexy far, far away by Omestes · · Score: 1

      Though I remember that back in the day Cyrix was the... uh... crap parts for lack of better words. We used to sit around making fun things running cyrix chips/mobos. We used to SERIOUSLY beat on them and their parts. I had an old BBS running on a pc with the cyrix 166, ran okay, but had heat problems, was kinda unstable, not very good for a 5 node BBS. But it was a bargain box, and it's hard to tell what is being crappy, the cyrix chip, or the crappy mobo.

      IMHO you get what you pay for. You buy a cheapo PC you get crap in the end. If you want to scimp out of paying for a real PC, then DON'T buy one. But I guess there will alway be a place in the market for the crap part market, like Cyrix and ECS.

      I just hope that AMD doesn't get any ideas from them and start making bad chips for cheaper. So far AMD has been very cost effective, making superior chips cheaper, that use less power and make less heat. but if they start just going for ONLY the cheap like Cyrix did i have a feeling I'm going to become an Intel guy (like there is a damn choice).

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    9. Re:In a galexy far, far away by finallyHasANickname · · Score: 1

      (Sniffle.) Going down memory lane, hmm? Awwww. I lost my C++ cherry at 10 MHz on a Cyrix-equipped AT clone. It was in a butt-ugly greenish beige box from Northgate Computer. The turnkey machine was the precursor to the M1A1 Abrams tank, man. You could put an office staff on top of one of them things. The "tin" must have been like 14 guage. Anyway, the chip had no math coprocessor. It looked so cute sitting in the QFP square (68 pins???? maybe the next size bigger), and you could actually look at it and touch it. There was no fan or big ole' heat sink covering it up.

    10. Re:In a galexy far, far away by WoTG · · Score: 1

      I had a PR200+ too. When MP3's became important to me for background music, I ended up 'upgrading' to a 2nd hand Pentium 166 MMX CPU. It was moderately slower for office and web, but at least playing an MP3 only cost 10% CPU. So it netted out to be a better system.

      Unfortunately, I've got unpleasant memories of that PC, but that was mostly the motherboards fault - a PC Chips special. =) Last time I ever let the store pick the parts!

  15. Re:* News Flash * News Flash * News Flash * by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's the funniest troll I've seen in years

  16. Better Device Girls image by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    For what it's worth, Google is your friend


    1. Re:Better Device Girls image by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why is there a screaming monkey standing in the middle?

    2. Re:Better Device Girls image by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      why is there a screaming monkey standing in the middle?

      That's a negro you insensitive racist pig.

  17. AMD Using Geode to Lower Opteron/Athlon64 Power by reporter · · Score: 5, Insightful
    AMD is buying the 80x86 division of National Semiconductor (NSM) in order to obtain the embedded 80x86 technology and employee talent for lowering the power consumption of Opteron and Athlon64. The AMD 80x86 processors have generally run hotter than Intel 80x86 processors. Since AMD is in a brutal competition with Intel for marketshare, AMD must quickly improve its competitive position.

    AMD will not use the 80x86 division of NSM to create a 80x86 embedded processor. 80x86 chips fare poorly in the embedded market, which is dominated by ARM.

    1. Re:AMD Using Geode to Lower Opteron/Athlon64 Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      wow that is utter bullcrap.

      ARM processors are very tiny nitche of the embedded market. Most embedded systems use 68HC Motorola processors and if they need more power X86 Based because of the flexibility of RTDOS and RTLinux.

      Go ahead, fine me a PC-104 ARM based board. gee why does most of the embedded system tha mean a damn like industrial control/ flight systems and automation NOT use ARM??

      because embedded = a whole helluva lot more than the crappy PDA toy market.

    2. Re:AMD Using Geode to Lower Opteron/Athlon64 Power by evilviper · · Score: 2, Informative
      The AMD 80x86 processors have generally run hotter than Intel 80x86 processors.

      That's just not true anymore... As of about the P4 days, Intel has been using just as much power, and putting off as much heat as equivalent AMD processors.

      In fact, comparing an Intel P4 2GHz to my AMD XP 2000+ was interesting... It looks like the AMD chip gives off less heat, and also has a maximum operating temperature that is 20C degrees greater than the P4. That doesn't bode well for Intel.

      http://users.erols.com/chare/elec.htm
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:AMD Using Geode to Lower Opteron/Athlon64 Power by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Not only that but my Athlon XP uses 44 watts, and supposedly Athlon 64 will consume 40 watts or less. So AMD is becoming more power-efficient.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:AMD Using Geode to Lower Opteron/Athlon64 Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact, comparing an Intel P4 2GHz to my AMD XP 2000+ was interesting... It looks like the AMD chip gives off less heat, and also has a maximum operating temperature that is 20C degrees greater than the P4. That doesn't bode well for Intel.

      And it runs a 600 MHz less. DOH! I don't think that has anything to do with it...

    5. Re:AMD Using Geode to Lower Opteron/Athlon64 Power by SiMac · · Score: 1

      And has the same speed, so the MHz rating is irrelevant...

    6. Re:AMD Using Geode to Lower Opteron/Athlon64 Power by Hoser+McMoose · · Score: 2, Informative

      AMD chips have not generally run any hotter than their Intel counterparts. Occasionally one of the other might consume more power, but they tend to switch order. Right now Intel is quite firmly in the "hot seat" so to speak. Top-end P4's are consuming over 80W of power, while the top AthlonXP chips are only using about 65W of power and the Opteron uses less (though it's exact power consumption is currently undocumented). Back when the Athlon was competing with the PIII, the Athlon consumed more power. Before that the AMD K6-2/K6-III chips consumed less power than comperable PII/Celeron chips, however the K6 chip consumed more power than the Pentium MMX.

      In all though, I'm really not sure what AMD is after with this purchase. They already have a line of embedded x86 processors (which DO have a very good use in the embedded market in that they are by far the easiest chips to develop for and can often use a lot of existing software instead of requiring companies to develop their own). They might be looking to take some of the video/sound/etc technology embedded in the Geode chip and add it to their own embedded line. However, AMD has mostly discontinued their line of embedded x86 chips in favor of their new Alchemy line of MIPS chips. Maybe their buying the Geode as a sort of replacement for their old embedded x86 chips but kind of starting that whole division again from scratch? Or maybe they're hoping to glue some of the technology from the Geode onto the Alchemy chips? I don't know.

    7. Re:AMD Using Geode to Lower Opteron/Athlon64 Power by mvdw · · Score: 2, Informative
      Go ahead, fine me a PC-104 ARM based board. gee why does most of the embedded system tha mean a damn like industrial control/ flight systems and automation NOT use ARM??

      What, like this?

  18. Mod down, goatsex link by msgmonkey · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The trollers are out in force today it seems.

  19. lame take off of the spices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but boobies are boobies.

  20. This headline has so many acronyms... by Savatte · · Score: 3, Funny

    that with a few changes, it would be as if somebody forgot to turn caps lock off.

    1. Re:This headline has so many acronyms... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, I doubt it would even pass slashdot's normal comment lameness filter...

  21. Layoffs at National by aSiTiC · · Score: 1
    Recently National let go of almost all their wire-less design groups [news.com.com story].

    In that article National mentions the sub-$1000 PC business as one of their main areas of further interest. With this sale of the Geode, etc... I wonder how many more could be laid off and where National is looking for the future?

  22. Hmmm interesting moderation. by FreeLinux · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Let's see: AC posts goatse link and gets modded +2 Informative!!! Now one must ask, are the trolls the problem with Slashdot or is it moderators that don't even read the comment befpre moderating?

  23. If ya wanna be my lover by aardwolf204 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ya gotta be compatible

    --
    Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
  24. Stating the obvious? by hndrcks · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Does AMD's purchase of low-power technology have anything to do with this?

    --
    Everyone will start to cheer when you put on your sailin' shoes.
    1. Re:Stating the obvious? by Hoser+McMoose · · Score: 1

      Doubt it. The PDA in question in that article is based around the AMD Alchemy line of MIPS chips. The Geode processor that AMD is buying from National Semi is based around an x86 chip.

  25. Device Girls?! by bersl2 · · Score: 1

    What was National Semiconductor trying to tell us? That the Device Girls had some "powerful hardware?" No thanks, I think I'll pass. It would have made me feel bad about my own puny hardware.

  26. ^^^^ Homo, for sure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm actually a male geek..... I disapprove of the objectification of women in modern society....

    You sorta exposed yourself there, swifty.

    1. Re:^^^^ Homo, for sure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry if you folks are all so unstable in your sexuality/homophobic that you have to treat women like trash just so nobody suspects you.

  27. Reader jlouderb reminds us of .... by stratjakt · · Score: 0, Troll

    ... his homosexuality.

    Who the hell complains about a handful of cute chicks at a trade show?

    There's always the Apple booth and your local LUG.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  28. Ding! Ding! Ding! ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... And we have a WINNER!!

  29. Re:WARNING! TUBGIRL LINK IN PARENT! by gnuadam · · Score: 1

    There is no tubgirl. Worry not.

    --
    You say :wq, I say ZZ. Why can't we all just get along?
  30. still got one, fried another by carelessness. by twitter · · Score: 1
    They were sensitive to heat. I bought two as an undergrad and used them for simple FORTRAN CFD. They ran much better under Red Hat 6 than they did under Windblows, but excesive heat and humidity could bring them down.

    I still have one configured as a simple dialout box. It works well and shares dialup service with an ethernet card.

    The other, I may have fried. The new XFree86-4 stuff pumped it's video to 90 Hz! This is far in excess of the orignial specs. I put in antoher cooling fan for the second chipset, but shorted 12 while it was running. I have not fooled with it since, but it did not come back. It may be that I fried the board, it may be that I fried the power supply. One day, I'll check it out again. Today, I don't really need it.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  31. Re:The early days of 586/related were interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod parent up. It's not a troll!

    That link was quite informative. I don't know why anyone would mod you down.

  32. Competition for VIA EPIA? by Stonent1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This looks like it could directly compete with the EPIA Mini-ITX. I don't know what the fastest media gx core is, but it would be cool if AMD released a Mini-ITX board based around it. Especially if it could be done cheaper than the VIA board.

    1. Re:Competition for VIA EPIA? by ethehot · · Score: 1

      that would absolutely be worth seeing, but i dont see competition on mini-itx anytime soon, expecially now with the new nemiah core out its gonna take a while to develop something comparable i guess, also talking about price. Btw my home gw/fw's been running off an Epia-M for months now, rock stable as ac/dc with quite a lot of traffic and users, and what about padlock! gonna take a while.... go mini-ITX!

  33. Good tech by afidel · · Score: 3, Funny

    I remember Alan Cox stating that he was using a Media-GX based system to write and test the soundblaster layer for linux because the media-GX was a better fit to the SB standard then any of Creatives then current chips. He reasoned that if he could get closer to the origional standard then most clones would work, and aparantly he was right =)

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    1. Re:Good tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad the driver for the original Windows Sound System stopped working when he got his hands on it.

  34. Slashdot World Events Futures Quotes: +1,Patriotic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic


    Cheney seeks asylum in France by Nov. 2004 120.00 +2.30

    Blair hosts Do You Want To Be A Millionaire by Jan. 2004 98.65 -3.05

    G. W. Bush indicted for tax fraud by Oct. 2003 111.45 +0.34

    Saddam Hussein disovered in Cheney's bunker by Sept. 2004 99.00 +0.89

    Cheney seeks asymlum in Afghanistan by Sept. 2004 101.23 -0.67

    Rumsfeld plays Dr. Strangelove in Dr. Strangelove II 100.00 -0.93

  35. The Geode Sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My company uses the Geode in a shipping, and important, product. And we have had nothing but trouble with this chip (it has made my life hell on and off for most of two years now). The biggest complaint is that it has no background debug capability. There is no way to debug this chip. How do they (Cyrix/Via/Nat'l/AMD) debug it? They don't, effectively. They just run some programs on it, and it seems to run OK. It does NOT run OK. From experience.

    Oh, and just disbelieve the specs. They lie like a cheap rug. For example, when it says it runs at 1.8v core volage, what they really mean is that it runs at a 2v core voltage- or maybe 2.1v. Something like that, they're not real sure. And they claim to match a 266Mhz Pentium- another lie. I strongly suspect this sucker is a 486 with the Pentium instructions added (no MMX). Certainly judge performance accordingly.

    IMHO, AMD screwed up buying this chip. They would have been better off taking the K5 or K6 cores, shrinking them onto 130nm process, tossing the north and south bridges on chip as well (plus a background debug module, please!), and saved themselves the money.

    1. Re:The Geode Sucks by Jameth · · Score: 1

      Well, they may have been going for the IP and the tech involved in the chip as well. They may scrap it, then make something similar that doesn't suck, especially if there are patents involved.

      If Media-GX is the only single-chip computer really out there, there most likely are some patents in it.

  36. Most stable, works with any card, best system ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Is an AMD K6-III (not K6-III+) 400 MHz 2.0 v processor, on an FIC VA-503+ mother board, which runs a VIA chip set, of course.

    In terms of uptimes on my samba file server and NAT box, in terms of working with whatever card I shoved in it (BIOS upgrades for the newer stuff, of course), in terms of working with cheap shitty memory (after slowing the PC-100 RAM to 95 MHz), it just works. I have a stacks of junk Intel shit that works great until I actually wanted to put a Promise RAID card in it, works great until except you can't put a PCI video card in the first PCI slot, it has to be the second, works great except that it doesn't work great. It sucks.

    The ABIT KT7 with an Athlon or Duron approached the VA-503 / K6 combo in flexibility. I like those. Above that, getting into the 2 GHz and up boards and chips, nothing stands up to my standard of "working". Anytime you try to do something slightly weird (plug in several USB cards, and use the built-in, to load dozens of USB key chains at once with demo crap to be passed out as doorprizes at a conference, for example) something just doesn't work, you start fiddling, and next thing you know it is 7 pm and you are calling you wife telling her not to expect you in before midnight.

    People at work make fun of my bench with 4 VA-503+'s in their ancient AT cases, and my stack of spare 503 boards in cardboard boxes. But they don't complain when I get shit done on time.

    I'm looking forward to the next really reliable setup. What I would like to do is discover a cheap mini-ITX with that slow-ass VIA C3 chip on it that was cheap and low powered enough that I could just have dozens of them, esentially haveing a separate computer for each little task. I doubt it however. It just shifts a lot of problematic issues over to the network configuration.

  37. Ireland? Israel? Third World? by meehawl · · Score: 3, Interesting
    It would give as much capacity as Intel who owns FABs in third world countries.
    Next time you're visiting the Intel fabs in Ireland or Israel, why not loudly let some local people know your opinion of their countries as "third world"? Don't worry about healing your extensive injuries afterwards though, because both these countries have an amazing, free healthcare system that makes the US look, well, kind of "third-worldish".

    Where are the world's Fabs?
    --

    Da Blog
    1. Re:Ireland? Israel? Third World? by computechnica · · Score: 1

      Thanks for all the good info.. I stand very well corrected ;^P

    2. Re:Ireland? Israel? Third World? by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      ...both these countries have an amazing, free healthcare system...

      Wow, there's free healthcare out there? Who's giving it away?

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    3. Re:Ireland? Israel? Third World? by meehawl · · Score: 1
      the State may print money, but it does not create wealth.
      The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. -- John Kenneth Galbraith
      --

      Da Blog
    4. Re:Ireland? Israel? Third World? by autopr0n · · Score: 1

      because both these countries have an amazing, free healthcare system that makes the US look, well, kind of "third-worldish".

      Well, in the case of Israel they probably need it. And I think a lot of people might class Malaysia as a 3rd world nation, which is where they make a lot of their consumer desktop chips (although I heard they had to move back to china as the Malay plant wasn't able to cope with the newer dies sizes)

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  38. Not just video! by MarcQuadra · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But there's more! it's not just video on the CPU, it's the north AND south bridges! The CPU, GPU, memory controller, PCI controller, and who-knows-what-else are on this bad-boy! I've been wanting this sort of thing for a long time!

    I understand that the price will be longer development cycles and raw performance, but there are a LOT of uses for machines based on this type of thinking. Imagine how inexpensive PCs based on this type of thing could get, and how little power they would require! If managers get their heads around the idea of centralized computing again (as they should in the office) we're going to see huge demand for inexpensive fast-enough graphical terminals.

    --
    "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
    1. Re:Not just video! by finallyHasANickname · · Score: 1
      I understand that the price will be longer development cycles and raw performance, but there are a LOT of uses for machines based on this type of thinking. Imagine how inexpensive PCs based on this type of thing could get, and how little power they would require!

      Yeah. But that makes me wonder if that super duper closure of architecture wouldn't wind up inspiring someone to corner the market and play jealous pranks like SCO and Microsoft do in the system software space? Throughout the past several years when people were singing praise hymns to the improved cell phones, I always failed to get a boner. Where is the API? Where is the community? Where is at least the port for doing things? For quite a few generations of "amazing" cell phones, you were allowed the microphone, the speaker, the battery contacts, a dozen pushbuttons, and the rights to say wow and to pay technoparanoiacs royalties. Now if an ornery cuss like Scott McNealy were in charge of such things... ;-)

    2. Re:Not just video! by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

      Well there would certainly be something of a price to pay for more integrated machines, but considering that Linux is part of the march towards lower cost and more customized computing, I think we would be included rather than shut out of the emerging market. Who wants to make $100 computers if they only run MS or proprietary (expensive to develop and not interoperable) operating systems?

      I also think that here's a balance to seek, right now PCs are total beasts, there's nothing elegant about a modern motherboard, it's all a bunch of high-power chips slapped together heating up offices and costing fortunes in capital outlays. If it means having to bite the bullet and accept that not everything will be as open or as commodity-based, but it will yield a more streamlined, elegant, and effective computing platform as a whole, that's a bullet I'd like to get my teeth around.

      But as I said before, Linux and OSS could be a PART of that future by providing an inexpensive yet full-featured OS and tools for it. The designers of these computers would have only to gain by using Linux, they could sell their devices with OSS on them at a decent profit and their development input (drivers, mostly) would only be applicable to the hardware they make money on, there would be no 'penalty' for releasing their I.P. because it only applies to their own product.

      --
      "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
  39. Re:This just in....!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    uh... AMD, VIA, Cyrix and "whatever else" as you call it, they've all been making processors that work right out of the box for 1/2 to 3/4 the price of the main brands for a long while. AMD's have been reliably better than cyrix's, but thats why nobody uses cyrix's in the mainstream.

  40. good for AMD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe now they can prepare for when prescott comes out, because the opteron is just barely beating the p4-c, imagine when the p5 comes out, gonna be hell for amd

  41. Re:This just in....!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This just in...!!!

    You're either a moron or a troll.

    On second thought your post is so utterly stupid you're probably both!

  42. memories by 514x0r · · Score: 1

    the first machine i bought with my own money was a 486dx2/66 with a cyrix chip.....ah the memories....
    the last i saw it it was still working as a proxy server at my last job.

    --

    !(^((ri)|(mp))aa$)
  43. Huh by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    AMD is capable of making their own motherboards and chipsets, and usualy does when they come out with new CPUs. But they don't ship them for very long, figuring that it's better to have the taiwanese board and chipset makers on their side, as allies.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  44. Offopic!? by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    crazy on-crack moderators, why... well... actually that was kind of off topic. oh well. Topicality is the bane of human existence. We aren't little robots who live only to discuss narrowly defined fields at the appropriate time. Humans need to laugh, to joke, and to love, and promote products in inappropriate venues.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  45. when are we getting a sub-$999 Mac? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "A long time ago, in what feels like a different universe, Cyrix created the first sub-$1000 PC based on a 2 chip solution called the Media-GX."

    and we're still waiting for a sub-$1000 Mac (or at least a sub-$999 Mac).

  46. maybe a downside of a higher clockspeed? by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    The p4 is designed for a insane clock speeds, but CMOS chips dissipate no power until the clock changes. The faster the clock speed, the more energy it uses. Designing with a low clock speed/performance ratio could probably yield lower power use. Hmm...

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:maybe a downside of a higher clockspeed? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Designing with a low clock speed/performance ratio could probably yield lower power use.

      Which is what Intel does for their Mobile processors...

      Yet, despite the fact it is only 1.6GHz, the Pentium M performs just as well as the 2.2GHz Pentium 4.

      http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=3997 (bottom of page)

      I still don't know why Intel doesn't use the same technology in their desktop processors, or why no motheboard makers have yet made a mobo that accepts laptop processors (but would otherwise be a normal desktop mobo).
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  47. Um... by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    Via already does this with their EIPA chips, built in video and everything, IIRC.

    I wouldn't be suprised if NVida comes out with a high performance system though, with their expansion into chipsets.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Um... by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

      No they don't. I have an EPIA-platform machine in front of me right now, the CPU, north and south bridges, and various I/O chips are all seperate. The EPIA is just a regular PC motherboard crammed onto a small form-factor with a VIA CPU strapped onto it, no 'integration' whatsoever.

      --
      "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
  48. Re:Straight answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Hey, maybe you can answer something I've been wondering about.

    Just what the fuck is the deal with FAKE PORN? (Warning: this link is to porn, sort of. And sort of not.)

    Why is this type of porn made? Is it some kind of legal trick?

  49. Re:* News Flash * News Flash * News Flash * by Shriek · · Score: 0

    I will remain malnourised, thank you.

  50. I think... by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    It's made for non 'hardcore' mags like penthouse or something, which are sold at gas stations and the like. If they have really hardcore stuff they might loose the ability to sell in lots of locations. I think a lot of times porn like that is scanned from old magazines or something, because I have no idea why you would ever make porn like that for the 'net.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  51. The good side by The+Eye+of+the+Behol · · Score: 0

    AMD has been gaining some ground against Intel for quite a while now, it is good to note that from a business point of view, this integration of the two companies will produce products even cheaper than they are now.

    --
    ----- Friends, l33tists, l4m3z0rs! Lend me thy keyboards.
  52. Device girls? WAIT A MINUTE!!!! by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    Where is Ginger Device?

    There are imitations of Baby, Scarry, Sporty, and Posh. WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON. I want Ginger Device!!!!!!!

    I sure would like those ladies to give me a little personal demonstration on I/O, packets, mounting, and of course FSCK!!!!!

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  53. AMD by appler · · Score: 1

    Don't AMD me, you silly bastards. AMD my Cyrix MediaGX 150MHz processor back to life!

  54. Making too much out of this... by WoTG · · Score: 1

    I suspect many here are reading far too much into this news. Nat. Semi. was trying to sell this unit to shed costs, i.e. it probably wasn't (very) profitable. Thus, the asking price probably wasn't for very much cash. Who knows, they might even have gotten stock instead. Details weren't disclosed today, so there's no way to prove this either way, yet.

    In contrast, with Geode under AMD's control, there's a reasonable amount of overlap with AMD's Alchemy unit. They will be able to shed a lot of overhead in salaries and facilities. So maybe the Geode group breaks even or makes a small profit for AMD.

    Overall though, it's probably not an earth shattering development. Now if it had been Transmeta, it might be a different story... fast-tracked ultra-low power x86-64 laptops and blades... hmmmm.

  55. heat / overclocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    does anyone know how hot these all-in-one chips are going to get?
    what are the over-clocking rates (percent possible befor fry)?

    would be cool to see a chip with built in coolers instead of adding one externally ;)