Heh, I spent ages looking at your comment... did you mean 50,000 MS Word documents, each 200 A4 pages - in which case that's a _lot_ of typing. Or did you mean 200 A4 pages in total, in which case each word document is only 1 line long.
I got your meaning in the end though, you meant 'words' heh.
I get most of your points (and reluctantly agree), but not sure whether the performance part is legitimate - it seems unlikely that the marshaling interface is going to have any significant impact.
I work with lasers - and everyone that I've met in this field has had exactly one accident with the laser and partially blinded themselves temporarily or permanently in some way.
Myself, I shot myself in the eye with a 432nm (blue) pulse laser. After injections in the back of the eye, I was thank goodness okay a few days later.
You haven't tested that everything will fall down, therefore it's not a fact. All you can say is that you tested some objects, and those objects appeared to fall.
However, we agree. I agree that presenting gravity as a theory and not fact is just as solid ground as demanding that darwinism is presented as theory and not fact.
I was responding to the post that demanded that darwinism is presented as fact when it shouldn't be. I was responded that then everything should be presented as theory and not fact.
Hmm, he's anti-social because nobody listens to him and yet he's usually right. I don't remember when he said something won't work then it does though. I only remember one episode where he was really wrong and that was the one where he nearly destroys the galaxy.
Especially in the first season though he says something, nobody listens to him, then he turns out to be right.
While I would have to check your info, you do have a thought provoking conclusion.
I do remember though that as a kid the science fiction section at my library was far too small. Maybe you are looking back to the past with rose tinted glasses?
Slashdot Mirror
Heh, I spent ages looking at your comment... did you mean 50,000 MS Word documents, each 200 A4 pages - in which case that's a _lot_ of typing. Or did you mean 200 A4 pages in total, in which case each word document is only 1 line long.
I got your meaning in the end though, you meant 'words' heh.
How do you know that there is "additional information" (whatever that means, you haven't defined it) in a living thing?
Thanks!
I get most of your points (and reluctantly agree), but not sure whether the performance part is legitimate - it seems unlikely that the marshaling interface is going to have any significant impact.
> Nobody has ever shown how new information can be generated by the sole interaction of energy and matter through time.
What about a snow flake? A fairly complex beautiful structure made from quite a simple process with simple ingredients.
I suspect though that you don't know what you mean by "new information". Try to define it as best you can, and I'll give you simple counter examples.
Hi,
A serious question - when is using SQL server the right tool for any job? Or was it because that's what the client wanted/knew?
Wow, do you think you could be just a little bit more polite next time?
I work with lasers - and everyone that I've met in this field has had exactly one accident with the laser and partially blinded themselves temporarily or permanently in some way.
Myself, I shot myself in the eye with a 432nm (blue) pulse laser. After injections in the back of the eye, I was thank goodness okay a few days later.
And what about those that do kill you? Look at the list of toys in the article - most of them killed several people at least.
You mean software fake-hardware raid. If it was truly hardware raid, then the OS wouldn't even see it as raid - just one disk.
Another good example though is if your disks are SATA drives
It broke your websites because it was parsing them badly, or because you had shitty html code?
which was pretty what my attempt at satire was getting at to the post I replied to
You haven't tested that everything will fall down, therefore it's not a fact. All you can say is that you tested some objects, and those objects appeared to fall.
However, we agree. I agree that presenting gravity as a theory and not fact is just as solid ground as demanding that darwinism is presented as theory and not fact.
I was responding to the post that demanded that darwinism is presented as fact when it shouldn't be. I was responded that then everything should be presented as theory and not fact.
I think that makes it an excellent example.
You don't see people complaining that the laws of gravity are taught as fact at school.
And I demand that gravity is presented as a theory and not fact.
Why don't you campaign against that? All those teachers teaching that things fall down as fact
Hmm, he's anti-social because nobody listens to him and yet he's usually right. I don't remember when he said something won't work then it does though. I only remember one episode where he was really wrong and that was the one where he nearly destroys the galaxy.
Especially in the first season though he says something, nobody listens to him, then he turns out to be right.
Haha, I love McKay. He's thinks everyone around him is stupid in comparison to him. And frankly, he's right.
If I was as smart as him, I'd turn out the same way. Cynical about everyone else.
"pretty much everyone who can hold a gun is our friend."
:-)
mmm, wait a few episodes
Ah okay, sorry.
And poor show on your behalf for letting them get away with it.
Get off your lazy ass and send a letter to oftell about it.
It's people like you that just roll over that encourages them to do this.
Good grief, there's 3 answers so far and all use 2 significant figures for their data, yet quote the answer around 10 significant figures!
Don't forget that the UK gave lots of patents to America to help it out during ww2 as well.
While I would have to check your info, you do have a thought provoking conclusion.
I do remember though that as a kid the science fiction section at my library was far too small. Maybe you are looking back to the past with rose tinted glasses?
What makes Britain a conformist society?
Surely the conservative would replace the bulb quickly to put things back the way they are.
The liberal would seek to embrace the new darkness and accuse those who complain as non-pc conservatives who resist all change.
What's a forward base? One on the dark side of the moon?