And even if I did, if they think I'd be willing to pay for the drivel that they're going to spam into their "news" feeds, all I can say is "HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!"
Then someone should prosecute the Federal Reserve for fraud. The currency clearly says legal tender for all debts, public and private./quote>
You don't understand the difference between "you can use this to pay a debt" and "you must accept payment in this particular format for a debt".
All that the relevant statute says is this:
"United States coins and currency (including Federal reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal reserve banks and national banks) are legal tender for all debts, public charges, taxes, and dues. Foreign gold or silver coins are not legal tender for debts."
It does NOT state that you must accept cash as payment. What it means is that coins and currency MAY be accepted, not that they MUST be.
"United States coins and currency (including Federal reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal reserve banks and national banks) are legal tender for all debts, public charges, taxes, and dues. Foreign gold or silver coins are not legal tender for debts."
It does NOT state that you must accept cash as payment. What it means is that coins and currency MAY be accepted, not that they MUST be.
"United States coins and currency (including Federal reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal reserve banks and national banks) are legal tender for all debts, public charges, taxes, and dues. Foreign gold or silver coins are not legal tender for debts."
It does NOT state that you must accept cash as payment. What it means is that coins and currency MAY be accepted, not that they MUST be.
That would be illegal in europe, and I bet it is illegal in your country, too. Cash is legal tender! Every creditor is by law required to accept cash, unless that law changes.
I don't know about Europe, but not in the United States. There is no law in the US that states that anyone must accept cash. If I'm wrong, please cite the law.
Riiiiiight...Trump says that the body is like a battery and that exercise is bad for you, and he thinks he invented the phrase, "priming the pump", and he says that "Any negative polls are fake news", and he said that he "knows more than all the generals", but I'm the one that's delusional...got it.
Seriously, I'd like some of what you're taking, but in a smaller dose.
Want to have some friends to participate? Send out some e-mails, costs nothing, and tell them it's a pot luck. A few more bucks will get you use of the church hall, or a public park, or just find a friend with a large backyard. A few more bucks for a cake, maybe a couple bottles of champagne, and everyone is happy.
Hear, hear, I couldn't agree more.
We got married in a lovely little nearby park and just had 5 or 6 close friends there, no big fancy ceremony. A week later we had everyone come to a celebration/reception party at a friend's place out in the country. Again, no big fancy production, just an enjoyment of friends. It was great. It's been ~10+ years now and we couldn't be happier.
There's no need for a gigantic wedding production and a huge elaborate ceremony...just go simple and low drama. I've seen too many fights get started over wedding plans than I can count...it gives some people a full buffet of stuff to fight over.
Maybe they didn't share your fucked up belief in this archaic ritual called marriage.
And yet some of us really like marriage, should we not be allowed to engage in it? Should we be shunned or derided or treated differently just because we're married? Why do you care if two (or more) adults decide to live a certain way?
As for "archaic rituals", I should tell you that there are a million different kinds of "marriage" and many of them don't involve any rituals, archaic or otherwise.
What a jackass... now the FCC is going to burden us honest folk with extra paperwork. I liked being able to submit my AU to the ULS and it being approved the next day automatically.
I'm that was convenient and all, but what if it was someone mucking about with your records and changing stuff in them?
Those records may give him enough credibility to enable him to bluff his way through some other transaction or fraud, which may be the real target of what he was after.
Changing the owner that is listed in one federal database doesn't actually transfer ownership of the assets in question.
Yes, but those entries may be enough to enable you to bluff your way through some other transaction or fraud scheme, if it looks like you're the owner.
Slashdot Mirror
Never used it, never will.
And even if I did, if they think I'd be willing to pay for the drivel that they're going to spam into their "news" feeds, all I can say is "HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!"
Then someone should prosecute the Federal Reserve for fraud. The currency clearly says legal tender for all debts, public and private./quote>
You don't understand the difference between "you can use this to pay a debt" and "you must accept payment in this particular format for a debt".
All that the relevant statute says is this:
"United States coins and currency (including Federal reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal reserve banks and national banks) are legal tender for all debts, public charges, taxes, and dues. Foreign gold or silver coins are not legal tender for debts."
It does NOT state that you must accept cash as payment. What it means is that coins and currency MAY be accepted, not that they MUST be.
All that statute says is this:
"United States coins and currency (including Federal reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal reserve banks and national banks) are legal tender for all debts, public charges, taxes, and dues. Foreign gold or silver coins are not legal tender for debts."
It does NOT state that you must accept cash as payment. What it means is that coins and currency MAY be accepted, not that they MUST be.
All that statute says is this:
"United States coins and currency (including Federal reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal reserve banks and national banks) are legal tender for all debts, public charges, taxes, and dues. Foreign gold or silver coins are not legal tender for debts."
It does NOT state that you must accept cash as payment. What it means is that coins and currency MAY be accepted, not that they MUST be.
Thanks for posting that information. I did not realize that was the case
That's because it's not the case. There is no law in the US that states that anyone must accept cash.
That would be illegal in europe, and I bet it is illegal in your country, too.
Cash is legal tender!
Every creditor is by law required to accept cash, unless that law changes.
I don't know about Europe, but not in the United States. There is no law in the US that states that anyone must accept cash. If I'm wrong, please cite the law.
"Why do you think carrying cash is so dangerous?"
I don't. I regularly carry cash and I don't worry about it.
"Amazon May Give Developers Your Private Alexa Transcripts"
Translation: "Amazon Has Already Given Developers Your Private Alexa Transcripts"
Just pointing out your're fucking delusional.
Riiiiiight...Trump says that the body is like a battery and that exercise is bad for you, and he thinks he invented the phrase, "priming the pump", and he says that "Any negative polls are fake news", and he said that he "knows more than all the generals", but I'm the one that's delusional...got it.
Seriously, I'd like some of what you're taking, but in a smaller dose.
She's a globalist! She's the embodiment of totalitarianism!!!! FFS, look at her Mao suits; she definitely doesn't hide who she really is!
I can't tell if this is an attempt at humor or a cognitive impairment...(could be both, I suppose)
...this so-called president is an idiot who is in waaaaaaaaaaaay over his head.
What an epic fountain of pure shit.
If your intent is to turn people away from religion, keep it up because you're doing a fantastic job!
50 cal GI is hardly the most powerful cartridge at 700 Joules and 1000 FPS.
What part of "...one of most powerful" seemed unclear? No one said it was the most powerful.
Want to have some friends to participate? Send out some e-mails, costs nothing, and tell them it's a pot luck. A few more bucks will get you use of the church hall, or a public park, or just find a friend with a large backyard. A few more bucks for a cake, maybe a couple bottles of champagne, and everyone is happy.
Hear, hear, I couldn't agree more.
We got married in a lovely little nearby park and just had 5 or 6 close friends there, no big fancy ceremony. A week later we had everyone come to a celebration/reception party at a friend's place out in the country. Again, no big fancy production, just an enjoyment of friends. It was great. It's been ~10+ years now and we couldn't be happier.
There's no need for a gigantic wedding production and a huge elaborate ceremony...just go simple and low drama. I've seen too many fights get started over wedding plans than I can count...it gives some people a full buffet of stuff to fight over.
I had thought a Desert Eagle costs in the range of $1000.
Even used a Desert Eagle is ~$1200 and up, most are in the $1500 range.
http://www.gunbroker.com/Deser...
It'll be interesting to see where the gun comes from and how he got a hold of it.
Maybe they didn't share your fucked up belief in this archaic ritual called marriage.
And yet some of us really like marriage, should we not be allowed to engage in it? Should we be shunned or derided or treated differently just because we're married? Why do you care if two (or more) adults decide to live a certain way?
As for "archaic rituals", I should tell you that there are a million different kinds of "marriage" and many of them don't involve any rituals, archaic or otherwise.
Doesn't change the fact that their genes get carried on regardless, which is the whole point of calling it the DARWIN Award.
Exactly, they already had kids so they're ineligible to win.
If your genes have been passed on then it doesn't matter how stupidly or spectacularly you die, you still can't win the Darwin Award.
"Take one of most powerful handguns in the world and shoot it into this book that I'm holding in front of my chest."
What could possibly go wrong?
I fully expect this to become popular as "The Book Challenge" on the YouTube channels of idiots everywhere.
"...a Disaster Waiting To Happen"
I think that's putting it mildly. It may well be the understatement of the century.
What a "breath of fresh air" when a president does exactly what he campaigned on doing as president; and it produces results!
You be sure to let us know when that happens.
Wow, 900 jobs spread amongst 300 million people, what a triumph.
Lighter color coatings reflect more heat. Complete with expert testimonials!
Who could have imagined that a lighter color would be more reflective? Science Marches On!
What a jackass... now the FCC is going to burden us honest folk with extra paperwork.
I liked being able to submit my AU to the ULS and it being approved the next day automatically.
I'm that was convenient and all, but what if it was someone mucking about with your records and changing stuff in them?
Those records may give him enough credibility to enable him to bluff his way through some other transaction or fraud, which may be the real target of what he was after.
Changing the owner that is listed in one federal database doesn't actually transfer ownership of the assets in question.
Yes, but those entries may be enough to enable you to bluff your way through some other transaction or fraud scheme, if it looks like you're the owner.