You'll discover that even when the book was written the NSA didn't have the capacity to monitor even a fraction of the internet, much less all of it. There's lots more traffic these days.
The GPL only requires that you provide source code if you provide the binary. So if you do a version for $SecretAgency, with $SecretStuff in it, then you only have to provide the source to $SecretAgency. Not to the general public.
Are you kidding? She's looking at felony witness tampering, contempt of court, and probably a couple of other things. The judge told her not to come back to court until she had gotten herself an attorney. If Moussawi (sp?) doesn't get the death penalty the lead prosecutor is going to throw the book at her and send her to jail for a few years.
There's an analysis up at CMU (linked to in the WaPo article) which shows that closed source vendors as a group are slower at patching than open source ones.
Slashdot Mirror
Hmmm, yeah, that probably needs some smilies and html markup to make the emotional context clearer.
I hit 41 yesterday.
Bagdad. Unmanned Military Ground Vehicles. Primarily for supply runs, but could also be used to troll for IEDs.
Ummm, yeah. That's the way they're supposed to work.
Since it is, after all, burned.
But it's a different meme anyway.
Step 2: Be Woz.
is not scaling up that much these days. Moore's Law hit a wall a couple of years ago.
You'll discover that even when the book was written the NSA didn't have the capacity to monitor even a fraction of the internet, much less all of it. There's lots more traffic these days.
and has been for years.
It was the US Embassy in Moscow. Happened in the 80's, IIRC.
Also writes a weekly column on NFL football during the season.
Cat got your tongue? (something important seems to be missing from your comment ... like the body or the subject!)
The GPL only requires that you provide source code if you provide the binary. So if you do a version for $SecretAgency, with $SecretStuff in it, then you only have to provide the source to $SecretAgency. Not to the general public.
Interesting freudian slip/unintentional double entendre in my previous post...
Are you nuts? I want to keep the damned thongs off my system.
Are you kidding? She's looking at felony witness tampering, contempt of court, and probably a couple of other things. The judge told her not to come back to court until she had gotten herself an attorney. If Moussawi (sp?) doesn't get the death penalty the lead prosecutor is going to throw the book at her and send her to jail for a few years.
Right? So this is not a new problem.
Since, in order to fight the malware, they have to operate at the same ring level it does.
They're gonna be pissed...
owned by ZDNet, I suspect the answer is "yes".
You know, looking at the address and the return address on the envelope for regular mail doesn't require, iirc, a warrant.
There's an analysis up at CMU (linked to in the WaPo article) which shows that closed source vendors as a group are slower at patching than open source ones.
"Today's post marks the second in what I hope will be a series of similar analyses. " He's got a link to a meta-study from CMU in that article too.
But you've been hoping that for years. Sort of like controlled fusion which has been fifty years away for, oh, fifty years or so.